Female hunters of the early Americas.

It's best not to take "buried with X, therefore an X-worker" claims too seriously! Source: https://t.co/8isMtkX3C1

@primalpoly @sciam https://t.co/c1zjvCD9Eb https://t.co/D8TxDewQu2 https://t.co/gev9X1qz4p

@IvanNirov @battle_of_xena @masturboginya2 https://t.co/CTMHcncxte

@LGnzlzH Insisto, no es lo que tú pienses, es que hay estudios que lo demuestran https://t.co/EDOC08lcaQ https://t.co/0LQ6B1VljR

For anybody who thinks hunting is just for redneck dudes...https://t.co/FhApYgZkBP

@idwaslost @masturboginya2 Влом вмешиваться в ваш диалог, но раз уж увидела, то ловите ссылку с ископаемыми женщины охотницы https://t.co/dktlFqBB7R Там под конец уже все выводы, в середине просто описание ископаемых

@f__7777_ انمي و هوليود ايه يا جاهل ده العلم https://t.co/ArJ6IvRcwt

4: Sonuç: Tarih öncesi dönemde cinsiyete dayalı iş bölümü düşündüğümüz kadar katı değildi. Modern önyargılar geçmişteki kadın avcıların gözden kaçmasına yol açmış olabilir.

元の論文 Female hunters of the early Americas | Science Advances https://t.co/eX6MRCE585

RT @gamer_yuu: @yqfaJa710K70111 @pine_institute @Toki_no_Kagi あと英語がお読みできるようですので、元の論文を置いておきますね。 記者のバイアスがかかっていない、リファレンスも入ったものですので、ニュートラルに読んでい…

@yqfaJa710K70111 @pine_institute @Toki_no_Kagi あと英語がお読みできるようですので、元の論文を置いておきますね。 記者のバイアスがかかっていない、リファレンスも入ったものですので、ニュートラルに読んでいただけるかと思います。 Female hunters of the early Americas | Science Advances https://t.co/eX6MRCDxix

@UrticariaMental @Camzmendes7 @v4mpbld @DarkSymphony64 https://t.co/ryRZvJ9cA8

@SpeedyGrucha @Karolina1652463 @Warszawski_R Tu kilka linków do badań: https://t.co/RYNFbke2xi https://t.co/mjpdxYTT61 https://t.co/8oz2i1e0op https://t.co/z3T1BFItGU https://t.co/3zDkret34n

@J_R4ptor @CatNB_3 @_lucasverissim https://t.co/RUHCrFdRQz tenho ele traduzido se preferir

@hmwrecked @fattemmehh https://t.co/o4PXqWtAdz بیش از ۵۰ درصد شکارچی ها زن بودن https://t.co/DlMb9DH6eK نقاشی غارها کار زنا بوده https://t.co/G4nRQzVHAU بودیکا https://t.co/2cpIVSSb0t جنگجوهای زنی که با شمشیر و زره دفن میشدن و لقب فرماندهی داشتن https://t.co/vw3AatOW7E اینم یه منبع دیگه

Female hunters of the early Americas | Science Advances https://t.co/DMVRxQilpx

@samscofield440 @asena_arslanqx İngilizcen yok biliyorum ama çevirtebilirsin tech gelişti siz de göt olun diye https://t.co/iS2mBZjAt7 https://t.co/m8kL3U8kt3 https://t.co/Uqs0xmM829

Adding to this mini thread on studies that have found women as hunters and warriors from archaeological remains - Teenage girl in Peruvian Andes hunted big game 9000 years ago leading to this brilliant new study https://t.co/IrICq8M4yM

@BryanLand111980 @tammywitdabammy @Virawasp4080 @TheCriticalDri2 https://t.co/bae7Ioj9f2 https://t.co/6RMJt74Hvu

@BryanLand111980 @tammywitdabammy @Virawasp4080 @TheCriticalDri2 https://t.co/6RMJt74Hvu

RT @demroach: @zorn1981 @Bufo_Machina @RWalkerFW @Rothmus Link 1: https://t.co/ouLj4rUkUs. Link 2: https://t.co/jfRTozBoRD Link 3: https:…

@zorn1981 @Bufo_Machina @RWalkerFW @Rothmus Link 1: https://t.co/ouLj4rUkUs. Link 2: https://t.co/jfRTozBoRD Link 3: https://t.co/A6EEXQfQ6d Link 4: https://t.co/HimVjAJcxC.

@Russ2d122387 @Rothmus Oh yeah so basically they did not always hunt together, but saying they never hunted together is also far from the truth Many tribes do it today as well And https://t.co/PbSBFYlO9F

@playlikeajet24 @craigwr42573037 @pinealprophet @Rothmus A study done by Hass et al, about 30-50% of big game hunting estimated to be done by women in hunter gatherer societies: https://t.co/jrBYRSMapd). Most studies suggest up to 50% and agree on that number: https://t.co/jfRTozBoRD It’s a long read.

@demroach @craigwr42573037 @pinealprophet @Rothmus Since you just made up a random number - here is the study you are referencing. 27 hunters from different burial cites. 11 were female. https://t.co/AYzpL2Cz97

@HighHogHeaven1 @Rothmus Gravesites https://t.co/PbSBFYlO9F

@FieriKim @penguinbutEVIL @Rothmus Lmao blocking me after asking a question is the funniest “I’m scared of being proven wrong” ever, even I am not like that https://t.co/UGxNVIKMry Zvejnieki Burial Ground Dolní Věstonice, Czech Republic Wilamaya Patjxa, Peru Skateholm, Sweden

@ChifladoEl Aportacion https://t.co/TDOqg13tz3

@ultimopedazodeL @grok @deepdishthinks @IncelsCo @DelusionPosting https://t.co/qPkjFVSa7b https://t.co/LnJnLXXDC5 https://t.co/jfRTozBoRD

@letralista @zarya17 Comenzando por el artículo ya deporsi comienza errado porque precisamente parte de la ya refutada idea, por meta-analisis, de que el hombre era cazador y la mujer recolectora... https://t.co/JjJklRdU4S

@LONGFuT_ @whatever Oh and I also hope you’re aware women in hunter societies did 30-50% of big game hunting and men also did their share in gathering: https://t.co/ouLj4rUkUs. So either way this whole video you sent is just a concept of a cliche Netflix show.

@4ndr3br4nd @adrianfartade42 @Simone_Lenzi Ma chat GPT cosa? Ti sto citando un paper scientifico. "Mo va a finire che le donne cacciavano e i maschi allattavano" cazzo quanto sei fragile... Ti fa così male l'dea che le donne fossero patecipi alla caccia? https://t.co/k20O10nAN0

https://t.co/WhCnAv7d2N https://t.co/lyQ2SoytLv https://t.co/yH4lqrY3Vs

@DiomayeFayee @AmstrongDean @EsdrasEpi https://t.co/lTsjuYCrBm

@gianconti85 https://t.co/PBl7q937GZ

RT @CtObserve: If you didn't already know, women have been running sh*t for at least 9000 years. VP Harris is the obvious choice for any n…

@Charvettebey @KamalaHarris If you didn't already know, women have been running sh*t for at least 9000 years. VP Harris is the obvious choice for any number of reasons over felon candidate Trump the proven serial liar, fraud, abuser, and proven racist. https://t.co/0R7TPPL7hr… https://t.co/3AMi8xXcLn https://t.co/Pv7CEXmpL6

If you didn't already know, women have been running sh*t for at least 9000 years. VP Harris is the obvious choice for any number of reasons over felon candidate Trump the proven serial liar, fraud, abuser, and proven racist. https://t.co/K4hT5tztJ2 https://t.co/kshIFvONiA https://t.co/Xe3a7aPMlP

@raywelles @Mirandolasweets Sí, hay pruebas. Insisto dime un paper que presente PRUEBAS de que solo los hombres cazaban. Pruebas físicas, digo. https://t.co/0LQ6B1VT9p https://t.co/EDOC08lK0o https://t.co/TdE7zejpmv

@ivanaepacheco @Mirandolasweets Estudio en yacimientos de toda América https://t.co/0LQ6B1VljR

@WildeFocker @e48847 @Yolywind @JALC_untot @Martinica6819 Es curioso cómo se traslada el miedo a que una señora cazara hace miles de años. Por lo demás, insisto no es una "opinión" como haces, es algo basado en estudios https://t.co/EDOC08lcaQ https://t.co/0LQ6B1VljR Que obvies los estudios por un "yo me imagino", dice mucho

@JALC_untot @PGonz8 Todo lo que dices como “biólogo” está desmentido por pruebas. O no eres biólogo o no abres un libro desde los años 70. https://t.co/wvRPpRhyt1 https://t.co/9hizxuoAcJ

@LGnzlzH Insisto, no es lo que tú pienses, es que hay estudios que lo demuestran https://t.co/EDOC08lcaQ https://t.co/0LQ6B1VljR

@El_Axel_Linares @LMS55828399 @tericienta @soldecuervo @JALC_untot Pero es que además han salido recurrentemente en la conversación numerosos papers_ https://t.co/0LQ6B1VT9p https://t.co/IVhLsRIUFT https://t.co/EDOC08lK0o

@FicticiusJr_ O sobre los datos que hay sobre la mujer como cazadora en la prehistoria https://t.co/EDOC08lcaQ https://t.co/0LQ6B1VljR

@Paterbubo @tanquedecasma @Bot_ChatGPT_ Te he puesto un tuit entero de libros. Por lo demás hay gente que ha aportado otros estudios, y se ha mencionado consistentemente este. Pero decides que eso no ha pasado igual que decides que no cazaban porque no te cuadra. https://t.co/0LQ6B1VljR

RT @ApuntesCiencia: @PGonz8 Pues verán cuando se enteren… https://t.co/9nKjYC6vBq

RT @ApuntesCiencia: @PGonz8 Pues verán cuando se enteren… https://t.co/9nKjYC6vBq

@FicticiusJr_ @PGonz8 @Sturmgirl88 https://t.co/OUvu6g90N5

@PGonz8 Pues verán cuando se enteren… https://t.co/9nKjYC6vBq

@pasabaxqui @PGonz8 Toma tribus. https://t.co/znCWsECtv4 Y más tribus. https://t.co/o4bpaCEiII Sí, la realidad se os escapa, tienes razón, y eso os jota. Y mucho.

@PGonz8 Aquí el texto de la fuente del dibujo -aunque me parece demasiado imaginativo- precisamente deja en claro la investigación de varios arqueólogos de EEUU y Perú del encuentro de armas de caza mayor junto a restos óseos de mujeres en el altiplano andino. https://t.co/S1kZHHBqvY

うーんわからん https://t.co/Y0AkNAjigN

@norbert_fr Jolie fable… https://t.co/DezGBRJ54j

@FreeBillG @NotAsdercol @Andrew87813286 @lporiginalg ''when they are lead by good masculine men'' LMAO not happening anytime soon, historically there are good evidences that women can actually lead or be hunters themselves, with these examples even dating to many millenia ago https://t.co/UWLUTdcfI7

@Figuerozki @OnionDepression @linvi1797 Aparte en serio crees que se van a leer todo lo que tiene esta revista? que es básicamente de ciencia y donde sacaron todo por eso coloco de noticiero mientras citen las fuentes para resumir y no ponernos en un revolo https://t.co/EK5CwhGuOt

@CISG37711 @pokegoats @TeenyTheTurtle @Rae_trh @Gappy78076769 @JasonKelce https://t.co/zOxzuZ0TWx.

@CISG37711 @pokegoats @TeenyTheTurtle @Rae_trh @Gappy78076769 @JasonKelce 2018, Randy Haas, Ph.D., an anthropologist at the University of Wyoming, also discovered that 9,000-year-old remains discovered in the Andes in Peru were thought to be male b/c they were buried with a large mammal hunting kit were also actually female. https://t.co/wGr5S8fIZB

@BlackDumpling57 @CussedWench @jenadarby @meghanttucker She isn't lying. https://t.co/9AH2n1DWdE https://t.co/VDfIGM6kaY https://t.co/q7Gcxy8cmu

@Mahatma_Bond https://t.co/ume83m4Ezp dann nutzen Sie halt die Quelle

@idwaslost @masturboginya2 Влом вмешиваться в ваш диалог, но раз уж увидела, то ловите ссылку с ископаемыми женщины охотницы https://t.co/dktlFqBB7R Там под конец уже все выводы, в середине просто описание ископаемых

@TakingOutTrash1 @iriscal @shmoink_ @nehadixit123 https://t.co/fG7jJnzFET

@TakingOutTrash1 @iriscal @BoyTam4 @nehadixit123 This is one of the studies….. it’s completely legitimate…. https://t.co/fG7jJnzFET

@IvanNirov @battle_of_xena @masturboginya2 https://t.co/CTMHcncxte

@RoxnaSuper @scaldymcgee here's the full scientific paper since your thoughts are just full of opinions. also it's kinda gay to write an entire paper without even citing a single source, you dingus. https://t.co/ZIk5iPONid

@Hohounk @bearmace @datepsych It's not true. There is data supporting the idea that women did hunt in the past. https://t.co/KvDMEXxaHy You just don't like it, that's the reason.

@UmbralRaptor 1. https://t.co/HlBtSJVnbD 2. https://t.co/UaJJuGwGdT 3. https://t.co/VX4iec2SCX

@BardFren @andrade_yepez

@mohana0303 @epanadiplosi además es pura paja… https://t.co/1GdJI28Dm8

RT @hollytrx7: @wj_reyes @epanadiplosi Si las dijo, sobre todo el sesgo común que se tiene de que las mujeres no cazaban cuando hay evidenc…

@mattwridley @CHSommers Well, there is other data, showing that women indeed were hunters. And it's not model, interpolation or survey - it's the gold standard, direct excavation results. https://t.co/KvDMEXxaHy

@datepsych Well, there is other data showing that women indeed were hunters. And this time it's not modeling or survey, but direct excavation results. https://t.co/KvDMEXxIx6

@wj_reyes @epanadiplosi Si las dijo, sobre todo el sesgo común que se tiene de que las mujeres no cazaban cuando hay evidencia de que si lo hacían. https://t.co/XBoxxpuBoA

@mystalkerisadik @Kissmyazz24 https://t.co/kBvy1MyuY6 https://t.co/SZMNEyzTTM https://t.co/iQgMIfASpG https://t.co/ChOqbVDZ42 https://t.co/7GLmDXmye9 https://t.co/E4kTd5nvBB https://t.co/YCyk7SFbKO https://t.co/KfCrZMtr5N I lived in a Julia Morgan home in the '70s - it was 4 floors & SOLID. https://t.co/8qjH6M2VQy

@clarionrox @AtualizadoSaber tua chamada ficou incorreta. Não era os caçadores que eram gênero neutro, mas sim a atividade de caça. E mesmo nesse caso, as evidências ainda são fracas e podem ter outras explicações, como os próprios autores apontam. https://t.co/brzvKbCKJH https://t.co/ZADt66BhH7

A favor de que hubiese mujeres cazadoras https://t.co/FEneAbXWiA https://t.co/GVWW57TaLl En contra https://t.co/zTFSqzIpD1 https://t.co/yBAWJPojNQ Todavía no los he leído, pero me interesa subrayar cómo la ciencia es más bien disenso (proceso) que consenso (resultado).

@PekkaKJKoivisto @erakoitunut @TomasSjoblom https://t.co/heIzE6aJJx

RT @ferrisjabr: @primalpoly @sciam https://t.co/c1zjvCD9Eb https://t.co/D8TxDewQu2 https://t.co/gev9X1qz4p

@Krysta92kat_ @JLyman_Stone @JoshLekach recent archaeological evidence from the Late Pleistocene suggested that females also participated in early big-game hunting. https://t.co/SDZ3vRvRma

@Die_Catharsis @celldCSGO @OnFireSemmler In the original article, in meat-heavy diets and absence of plant-processing areas, women’s % of hunting would get close to men. In Holocene when forager and plant growing tech develop, M/F ratio is 63:17. I wonder why medias don’t cover that part. https://t.co/OXgV8f7tXU

@Modoseit @joburt1989 @BaronVonPhul @finngalkn modern studies suggest women hunted, & still hunt today. https://t.co/gsMKgvZp3a https://t.co/9r0sxmuoOp in hunter gatherer societies, it would be less efficient to divide the work by sex. why demand that a talented hunter go gather berries just because she was a woman?

@timdavies_uk Nothing new. By definition, prehistory means there is no recorded history. So historians rely on archeology and on modern anthropology. Both suggest that hunting was a non-gendered labour. - Archeology : https://t.co/Lm5pK8AEmD - Anthropology : https://t.co/ABJxhN1DPD

@MrMMeira @SensoCrtico1 https://t.co/bEX3I1iiBz

@UmbelinoLopes @SensoCrtico1 https://t.co/bEX3I1iiBz

Females were hunters too https://t.co/CNLWr0kahm

RT @oolasha: @klaviercop @OwenGregorian Just one example: Female hunters of the early Americas https://t.co/uyo3c5PDHn

@klaviercop @OwenGregorian Just one example: Female hunters of the early Americas https://t.co/uyo3c5PDHn

https://t.co/pGLzYFyDlp

RT @Carl_Vibe: Women hunted as much as men. Most of the earliest archaeological evidence in the America’s shows that early humans hunted in…

@lolalirola @MrNobod72094840 @Psoglavac @YeBardi Very rigid gender roles did not make too much sense all the time, it's too simplistic. It seems a projection of our modern times. Even if there were activities one did more than the other https://t.co/9qK7aigQVD

RT @Carl_Vibe: Women hunted as much as men. Most of the earliest archaeological evidence in the America’s shows that early humans hunted in…

Women hunted as much as men. Most of the earliest archaeological evidence in the America’s shows that early humans hunted in pairs as a couple, both Man and Woman together, often with a dog, and the concept of men hunting and women staying home is modern. https://t.co/j6aig2hduv

@AmataTatami Thanks, interesting read! (For others, the article: https://t.co/PHCZNhAzeK ) And I'm not saying your arguments don't make sense. I totally agree, health & physical fitness probably was always the most important aspect in finding the ideal mate. Not just for men, women too.

RT @cremieuxrecueil: It's best not to take "buried with X, therefore an X-worker" claims too seriously! Source: https://t.co/8isMtkX3C1

It's best not to take "buried with X, therefore an X-worker" claims too seriously! Source: https://t.co/8isMtkX3C1

@WKCosmo @sciam I don't think that is true. Every museum I have ever been to shows the men hunting and the women with the kids. There was a study where they found out a hunter was a girl, they assumed first a boy because she had a big game hunting kit buried with her. https://t.co/nEI2fNloOX

@Annacreegan @eva_kurilova @PieATransphobe @sciam Is straight up and archeological fact https://t.co/VciAo1PJHb https://t.co/gS1S1BLUsI

RT @ferrisjabr: @primalpoly @sciam https://t.co/c1zjvCD9Eb https://t.co/D8TxDewQu2 https://t.co/gev9X1qz4p

@ed_hagen Ed, what are your thoughts on this study? It found that while hunting is overwhelmingly male among recent hunter-gatherer societies, that was not the case among the more early hunter-gatherers. https://t.co/hgD20ziEtA

@primalpoly @sciam https://t.co/c1zjvCD9Eb https://t.co/D8TxDewQu2 https://t.co/gev9X1qz4p

@DavidSHFraser @Titanic_Britain https://t.co/vnjA85aqGY Idk about unicorns but women definitely hunted

@DeBraskoRus @evil__sasha Ниже привожу самые свежие работы по теме, можно не благодарить https://t.co/V0kopEdiaL https://t.co/neNm1N6eh4 https://t.co/2A58R2C82G

https://t.co/sV2xCYp56f

男は家事が苦手。という科学的なデータはありませんね 例えばシェフでも理髪師でも男性も多いですよね ちなみに 9000年前の遺跡を調査したところ 狩従事の女性は少なくとも30-50%と推定されています 「男は狩り、女は採集」というのはどうにも思い込みのようです https://t.co/gsbC9Er9T9 https://t.co/qf8X55DlJM

@lostlost00000 @Iauraroslin https://t.co/lUMasudfKx me too

Here's another citation: "Female hunters of the early Americas" https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/sciadv.abd0310

#考古学のおやつ 3/3 →cf. Randall Haas et al. "Female hunters of the early Americas" Science Advances. Vol. 6, no. 45, eabd0310 [Science Advances (@ScienceAdvances)] https://t.co/AIz8SXPp9e

RT @bengreenfield: For anybody who thinks hunting is just for redneck dudes...https://t.co/FhApYgZkBP

For anybody who thinks hunting is just for redneck dudes...https://t.co/FhApYgZkBP

RT @qggchb4: 原論文これね https://t.co/dMZqhzkgb1

原論文これね https://t.co/dMZqhzkgb1 https://t.co/hry9KGHqJn

Hace dos días salió este paper: Female hunters of the early Americas https://t.co/aCVAzQuInu Da para pensar la verdad...

Changing biased ideas abt women in ancient societies, comes this superb paper(https://t.co/VXiJMmcfxg) showing women were equal participants in hunts 9K yrs ago in Americas. The 'men hunt, women gather' seen in recent #huntergatherers was not the rule then https://t.co/MjcBMYbLi5