Endoscopy October 2021 PMID 33246343

Efficacy of lumen-apposing metal stents or self-expandable metal stents for endoscopic ultrasound-guided choledochoduodenostomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Arnaldo Amato, Emanuele Sinagra, Ciro Celsa, Marco Enea, Andrea Buda, Filippo Vieceli, Lucia Scaramella, Paul Belletrutti, Alessandro Fugazza, Calogero Cammà, Franco Radaelli, Alessandro Repici, Andrea Anderloni

Full text PDF Download social card

Mentions

Peak: 4 in Sep 2021

across 3 sources since Nov 2020

Extended reach

22,822

potential audience

Total likes

Video views

155

Mentions per month

Nov 2020 – Sep 2021

Where it's discussed

X / Twitter5 posts
Facebook2 posts
YouTube1 videos

AI synopsis

What people are saying

The groups show high interest by referencing the meta-analysis acceptance and discussing the safety and efficacy of LAMS and SEMS, with tone emphasizing the clinical relevance and potential for influencing practice. Words like 'accepted,' 'efficacy,' and mentions of safety profiles highlight the importance placed on the publication, while the overall tone is professional and focused on practical implications.

AgreementModerate agreement

Most discussions acknowledge the study's findings that both types of stents are similarly effective, indicating broad agreement with the publication.

InterestHigh interest

The topics of stent types and their safety profiles are highly relevant to professionals, showing strong interest in the subject matter.

EngagementModerate engagement

Discussion participants reference specific aspects of the meta-analysis, such as safety concerns and clinical success rates, demonstrating active engagement.

ImpactModerate impact

The focus on potential shifts in clinical practice and safety considerations suggests that the findings could influence treatment decisions, indicating moderate impact.

Abstract in brief

This meta-analysis compared the effectiveness and safety of lumenapposing metal stents (LAMS) and selfexpandable metal stents (SEMS) used in endoscopic ultrasound-guided choledochoduodenostomy (EUSCDS) and found that both types of stents have similar success rates and adverse event profiles.
The study included 31 research articles with a total of 820 patients, reporting clinical success rates of around 93-94% and comparable reintervention and adverse event rates for both LAMS and SEMS.
Although both stent types are similarly effective, the review notes that the adverse events associated with their use need further investigation to better understand safety profiles.

Read the full abstract

All mentions

Comparative Effectiveness of Lumen-Apposing and Self-Expandable Metal Stents in EUS-Guided Bile Duct Drainage

This meta-analysis of 31 studies with 820 patients compares the safety and efficacy of lumen-apposing and self-expandable metal stents used in endoscopic ultrasound-guided choledochoduodenostomy, showing similar success…

endoscopythieme · Sep 22, 2021 155 views

Ali Cihat Yildirim

@dralicihat · X

RT @endoscopyjrnl: Author Commentary Efficacy of lumen-apposing metal stents (#LAMS) or self-expandable metal stents (#SEMS) for endoscopi…

Sep 29, 2021 · 2 shares · 1,647 followers View post →

Andrea Velasquez

@jeanvemer · X

RT @endoscopyjrnl: Author Commentary Efficacy of lumen-apposing metal stents (#LAMS) or self-expandable metal stents (#SEMS) for endoscopi…

Sep 29, 2021 · 2 shares · 2,484 followers View post →

Endoscopy Journal

@endoscopyjrnl · X

Sep 29, 2021 · 2 likes · 2 shares · 11,534 followers View post →

SystematicReviewBot

@EvidenceRobot · X

RT @CiroCelsa: LAMS or SEMS for palliative treatment of malignant biliary obstruction? Here our last #metaanalysis accepted on @endoscopyjr…

Nov 29, 2020 · 1 share · 6,703 followers View post →

Ciro Celsa

@CiroCelsa · X

LAMS or SEMS for palliative treatment of malignant biliary obstruction? Here our last #metaanalysis accepted on @endoscopyjrnl https://t.co/clzvDJy4XC

Nov 29, 2020 · 2 likes · 1 share · 284 followers View post →