Mentions
Extended reach
Total likes
Video views
AI synopsis
Discussions emphasize the robust and transparent nature of the Pfizer and Moderna trials, referencing large sample sizes (over 40,000 participants), peer-reviewed publications, and official sources like NEJM, to support the vaccine's efficacy and safety. Words like 'public data,' 'peer-reviewed,' and 'properly certified' exemplify a tone of trust, contrasting with skeptical comments that question trial integrity or promote misinformation, demonstrating a nuanced debate around scientific evidence versus conspiracy theories.
Most discussions acknowledge the study as well-conducted, with several citing the large sample size and peer-reviewed evidence supporting vaccine safety and efficacy.
Overall interest is high, as many postings delve into detailed analyses of trial data, methodology, and regulatory approvals.
Posts show moderate levels of engagement, with some users critically analyzing data, asking questions, and challenging misinformation.
The group collectively demonstrates a significant impact by reinforcing the credibility of the trials and the scientific consensus, although some comments reflect skepticism and debate.
Looks like Aseem Malhotra is lying about vaccines again. Here's a reminder that the science says otherwise: https://t.co/8J9jOzu03b
Le più grandi FRODI scientifiche nella Storia - Frodi sull'origine del virus: 1. https://t.co/tEXV684NSt 2. https://t.co/uZFj4imrss 3. https://t.co/Q1lONnzhmk - Frode di Pfizer: https://t.co/aMaHQ2xwsj - Frode sull'Idrossiclorochina: https://t.co/KY2szT2ntc https://t.co/oz0RKhFjFF
Comment peut-on mentir à ce point face à un monsieur à l'anglais approximatif qui hoche de la tête ? 43 448 participants, c'est un essai de grande envergure. https://t.co/GTShkeAJBD https://t.co/8sklRvl1RT
@KWestbrook0 @lexfridman @RobertKennedyJr Ethylmercury is different than methylmercury. RFK doesn't understand this or just chooses to lie about it. RFK is basically freaking out about elemental sodium despite eating salt every day. Watching this will help. Asking RFK about it won't. https://t.co/bCE9Qbf0zv
@fools_destiny @joeroganhq @Debunk_the_Funk runs circles around me. Check out his work. https://t.co/kLRkCUJ3Wi
Another reminder of everything that he is wrong about: https://t.co/T2V4NDbNso
BNT162b2 is a two-dose RNA vaccine that showed 95% effectiveness in preventing Covid-19 in a large trial involving over 43,000 participants. The vaccine was generally safe, with mild side effects like pain and fatigue…
Safety and efficacy of the BNT162b2 mRNA Covid-19 vaccine indicate a two-dose regimen conferred 94.8% protection, with a single dose showing over 92% efficacy. The vaccine is generally safe with mild side effects and…
SARS-CoV-2 Variants of Concern in the United States highlighting the emergence of B117, B1351, and P1 lineages. The video discusses their spread, prevalence, and potential impact on infection trends, emphasizing the…
Depuis plusieurs mois, des agents hospitaliers doutent face au vaccin. Cette vidéo explore les raisons soulevées concernant l'obligation vaccinale, tout en discutant des résultats préliminaires de la sécurité des…
This study investigates how COVID-19 vaccines affect virus spread within households in England, highlighting that vaccination, especially after two doses, reduces transmission and emphasizes vaccination's role in…
This video reviews the phase III clinical trial data for the Pfizer COVID-19 vaccine, highlighting its 95% effectiveness, safety profile, and consistent efficacy across diverse populations, based on a large-scale study…
BNT162b2 is a two-dose RNA vaccine that showed 95% effectiveness in preventing Covid-19 in a large trial involving over 43,000 participants. The study found the vaccine is generally safe, with mild side effects like…
BNT162b2 is a two-dose RNA vaccine that showed 95% effectiveness in preventing Covid-19 in a large trial involving over 43,000 participants. The vaccine was generally safe, with mild side effects like pain and fatigue…
This video reviews the primary COVID-19 vaccines approved by EMA, including Pfizer-BioNTech, Moderna, AstraZeneca, Johnson & Johnson, and others like Novavax, Sputnik V, Sinovac, and Sinopharm, highlighting their…
BNT162b2 is a two-dose RNA vaccine that showed 95% effectiveness in preventing Covid-19 in a large trial involving over 43,000 participants. The study included diverse groups, and results demonstrated consistent…
Robert F Kennedy Jr appeared on Joe Rogan, discussing vaccines and healthcare. This video analyzes the technique used to make questionable claims seem credible, emphasizing the importance of accurate scientific…
BNT162b2 is a two-dose RNA vaccine that showed 95% effectiveness in preventing Covid-19 in a large trial involving over 43,000 participants. The vaccine was generally safe, with mild side effects like pain and fatigue…
Dr Aseem Malhotra promotes a questionable paper linked to vaccine safety. This video reviews the study's validity, highlighting discrepancies and the importance of understanding vaccine-related risks versus COVID-19…
Vaccines for COVID19 explores your top questions. We explain the medical scientific evidence in plain terms, including how vaccines work and their safety profiles, with animations.
In this video, we provide an educational overview of COVID-19 and vaccination. We discuss the high contagiousness of SARS-CoV-2, the rapid spread of infections, and strategies for control such as active surveillance and…
COVID-19 vaccines like Pfizer, AstraZeneca, and Coronavac are available in Brazil. Learn about their differences, effectiveness, and which vaccine might be best for you based on current scientific understanding.
Vaccines are essential for preventing Covid-19, particularly for high-risk individuals, and the mRNA-1273 vaccine targets the spike protein of the virus responsible for the disease. This phase 3 trial involved over…
Vaccines are essential for preventing Covid-19, particularly for high-risk individuals. This video discusses the efficacy and safety data from a major phase 3 trial showing 94.1% effectiveness in preventing symptomatic…
This video discusses the implications of mass vaccination during a pandemic, potential immune escape, and virus evolution, highlighting the need for re-evaluating current vaccination strategies in light of recent…
We join Dr. Ndema Habib to discuss a study on COVID-19 infections within the community among vaccinated and unvaccinated individuals in the UK. The research focuses on the dynamics of SARS-CoV-2 transmission, shedding…
Current trials for COVID-19 vaccines do not conclusively determine their impact on saving lives. This video delves into the nuances of vaccine efficacy, emphasizing the importance of measuring long-term effectiveness…
This video discusses the heightened impact of COVID-19 on patients with cardiovascular disease. It reviews a study of 8,910 hospitalized patients, emphasizing mortality risks and the effects of ACE inhibitors and ARBs…
Geert Vanden Bossche warns about immune escape and challenges in vaccination strategies amidst global pandemics. The video discusses vaccine efficacy, virus mutations, and the need for re-evaluating current approaches…
This video discusses essential queries about COVID-19 immunity, including vaccine dosing, immunity duration, and reinfection risks. As the coronavirus mutates, ongoing research is vital to assess the implications for…
mRNA vaccines represent a promising advancement in vaccine development, enabling quick production, affordability, and safety. This video discusses their recent progress, potential applications, and future challenges in…
This week we explore recent COVID-19 research, focusing on a novel, amplification-free CRISPR-Cas13a assay for rapid SARS-CoV-2 detection from nasal swabs using mobile phone microscopy, offering high sensitivity and…
This audio project offers a comprehensive overview of COVID-19 vaccination, addressing its implications for patients with cardiovascular disease. It serves as an educational resource tailored for healthcare students to…
This video discusses the COVID-19 vaccine, addressing fears and scientific facts to inform decisions. It highlights the development process, past coronavirus vaccine studies, and the importance of vaccination in…
This video explains the mechanisms by which COVID-19 vaccines generate immunity, highlighting ongoing scientific research and the importance of vaccines in combating the virus. It acknowledges the contributions of…
This video simplistically explains the diagnosis and disease caused by SARS-CoV-2. It highlights the complexity of the virus and its diagnosis, emphasizing the importance of scientific research and expert insights to…
@GeeksGolfers @Hypothesis @harryfisherEMTP A. So why did he post it? He LIED. He lied about a little girl who died from a genetic condition. B. How has evidence been provided that ACM is in any way affected by vaccines? C. Covid vaccines work. https://t.co/Hitq8KtJ7K D. Why can't Harry provide evidence for his claims?
@Epictets1 @Scary7Dr @alexmcd19 @Alex_on_A14 @market_memetics @JaydenUddoman @AnnLove4All @cbeckj @TheKSLiberal @shinko_hadoken @KinseyKat1 @DrNice2022 @redheadlass1402 @BillDeWall9500 @JimeeLiberty @J91U17 @richykirsh @Boris4T @BurgerLab12 @BreezerGalway @sduncanhealth @jneill @scottstocker4 @msabouri @dirk_fasshauer @crabb_vicki @archie57426 @mercutioad @barryjohnreid21 @NeverV82625 @JKelleyK @Kristos416 @zee_parody @jilel76 @Mike6150817700 @Veeteejay1 @Charlie81789387 @Pouldeau61 @Yaboot710 @swords_mr @GhostOfChaplin @EyeOfTheMagi @ckellywpg @HossmanOfficial @epigeneticallyj @AbbyMaeKat @lavalmxhr @RobbiePNoCap @mcfunny @VaxPaparazzi https://t.co/sGUC12Oze9
@Alec_Zeck The Pfizer mRNA Covid-19 vaccine was tested in a double blind placebo controlled trial in which each “arm” had nearly 22,000 participants. https://t.co/4GIQt8fLwS
@OnTheWordOfNone @Sheeplady70 @IanCopeland5 @ICANdecide You mean like this? In what way does having a pH buffer in your saline make it active? https://t.co/YMj1nCguoy
@Sheeplady70 @IanCopeland5 @Sheeplady70 Unblinding was ethical crossover: placebo folks offered shots, but original allocations tracked for full analysis. No mystery groups. NEJM: https://t.co/aPrYQvktAH
@Sheeplady70 @IanCopeland5 Yes, against placebo. https://t.co/YMj1nCguoy
@Sheeplady70 @IanCopeland5 @Sheeplady70 Wrong! Pfizer's Phase 3 trial *did* use saline placebo in 44,000 people: 95% efficacy, with 9/10 severe cases in the placebo group. See the NEJM paper: https://t.co/aPrYQvktAH
@JBTC1971 @sabhlok @cremieuxrecueil If you start to fact check anti-vax claims you'll eventually realize than pretty much every anti-vax claim turns out to be BS. Pfizer trial: https://t.co/29qaO3ZY8h child: https://t.co/McJyg2Ku6h Moderna: https://t.co/BcSMT44YI6
@MonaVolitiva @Stardust1380 @Olivierfente @france_soir RCT Comirnaty (>43000 personnes incluses en aveugle) : https://t.co/UpmOMF7uG0
@CanadianvapeT https://t.co/gGPlBfLBP5
@RealJermWarfare @DrNeilStone @grok https://t.co/SpFQaPRzy9
@The_Sports_Geek @joeroganhq @grok https://t.co/VroUDX3XgR
@Keely_OReally @BaehlerEric @MGF2025 @DrNeilStone https://t.co/yyeAYPOZOo I can bet that they won't admit now.
@Kosch3076 @HugoHebR Ce n'est pas une "équipe", c'est un fait Sérieusement ? Dans quel monde tu vis ? https://t.co/MlYjKuEODK https://t.co/ZXEc1diYpc https://t.co/2krJioCN54 https://t.co/LVnvpPdxo1 https://t.co/39YkMuUjno https://t.co/n05JgxdngG https://t.co/z7g8Pl7EjD
@KAbregoGarcia @MikeOstrander86 @sayerjigmi Sorry you somehow believe that despite the data https://t.co/S48XCdKNym https://t.co/YeLoY9RYhq
@delbigtree You haven't the slightest idea what you're talking about. https://t.co/nNAbDi2k3k
@jeremys58863480 @fesshole Jeremy - this was published 5 years ago, maybe you didn’t see it. Perhaps you should share it with your 58 followers. Incidentally, the Fesshole post can’t be about Covid vaccination: it isn’t offered to children. Think Polio, Diphtheria, Tetanus, MMR. https://t.co/tNOxwcJsGV
@SpcialTK1 @corinne_lalo 1️⃣ ❌ « Injections expérimentales ARN m » Les vaccins ARNm ont passé toutes les étapes classiques (phases 1–3), ont été évalués par les agences (FDA, EMA, etc.) et sont maintenant des vaccins autorisés, pas des essais sauvages.
@MdBreathe @US_FDA They believe in this made up data that's already been discredited and was funded by the Medical Mafia. They hide behind "non profits". https://t.co/JEsff8j3hN https://t.co/OEz5mXiNql
@MsPatty1040 @protocolkills @Just4TheCause @VeritasEver @doritmi @ChrisJohnsonMD @ADonatiMD @JingPalaceWay @Wade_Jeremy76 @Rosewind2007 @thereal_truther @ItsAllLies1 @SpectrumomYeah @MsTrixter @RBuzzy1111 @carlsmythe @StopVaxxedLies @GeoffSchuler @steffieschiltz @MAhealthforkids @mloxton @seaglass34 @Luma923 @maidenwarrior @Vbalance03 @and_kell @mmelgar09 @Ordnance_Corner @rightwingblack2 @janestaller @IntactCervix @kidoctr @weaponizedword1 @chrisvcsefalvay @itsmePanda1 @REALITYofJNJ @what_if_007 @MissNeminly @AkathisiaRx @Biegenzahn https://t.co/Zp9ffUi9bg
@gustavostu @glauber_doc Safety and Efficacy of the BNT162b2 mRNA Covid-19 Vaccine | New England Journal of Medicine https://t.co/uvmPOwKcqS
@science2comedy @jakescottMD https://t.co/vQm0AMujeA
@tipiacelabomba @grok @Simona45104788 Studio sul Pfizer del New England Journal of Medicine https://t.co/Y4a4S0z8pi
@au79alpha @delbigtree https://t.co/JphL2V2vCT
@BurnScar3 @izzers_tennis @harryfisherEMTP @EasternFlorida https://t.co/Hitq8Ktbic This is the original Pfizer study. Double blind. Saline placebo. HPV, also used an arm with saline placebo. You believe a random bloke like Harry
@JabbedHymenator Inital clinical trial: NCT04368728 Research below. https://t.co/JVGPrF37K7
RT @michaelryan756: @Elkstone14879 @RogerGustafsso2 @wexlerwriting You asked for one double-blind placebo-controlled trial. Here are four —…
@Epictets1 @BillDeWall9500 @JimeeLiberty @redheadlass1402 @KinseyKat1 @Boris4T @cbeckj @richykirsh @DrNice2022 @market_memetics @BurgerLab12 @shinko_hadoken @BreezerGalway @sduncanhealth @jneill @scottstocker4 @mom4autism @J91U17 @Scary7Dr @msabouri @dirk_fasshauer @crabb_vicki @archie57426 @mercutioad @barryjohnreid21 @NeverV82625 @JKelleyK @Kristos416 @AnnLove4All @zee_parody @jilel76 @Mike6150817700 @Veeteejay1 @Charlie81789387 @Pouldeau61 @Yaboot710 @swords_mr @GhostOfChaplin @EyeOfTheMagi @ckellywpg @HossmanOfficial @epigeneticallyj @AbbyMaeKat @lavalmxhr @RobbiePNoCap @mcfunny @VaxPaparazzi @tcjepson @karleastlondon Here it is a third time.https://t.co/o3u3NflMlt
@BillDeWall9500 @JimeeLiberty @redheadlass1402 @KinseyKat1 @Boris4T @cbeckj @richykirsh @DrNice2022 @market_memetics @BurgerLab12 @shinko_hadoken @Epictets1 @BreezerGalway @sduncanhealth @jneill @scottstocker4 @mom4autism @J91U17 @Scary7Dr @msabouri @dirk_fasshauer @crabb_vicki @archie57426 @mercutioad @barryjohnreid21 @NeverV82625 @JKelleyK @Kristos416 @AnnLove4All @zee_parody @jilel76 @Mike6150817700 @Veeteejay1 @Charlie81789387 @Pouldeau61 @Yaboot710 @swords_mr @GhostOfChaplin @EyeOfTheMagi @ckellywpg @HossmanOfficial @epigeneticallyj @AbbyMaeKat @lavalmxhr @RobbiePNoCap @mcfunny @VaxPaparazzi @tcjepson @karleastlondon I have done. Here it is a second time. https://t.co/o3u3NflMlt
@BillDeWall9500 @Epictets1 @JimeeLiberty @J91U17 @cbeckj @DrNice2022 @AnnLove4All @richykirsh @KinseyKat1 @redheadlass1402 @Boris4T @market_memetics @BurgerLab12 @shinko_hadoken @BreezerGalway @sduncanhealth @jneill @scottstocker4 @mom4autism @Scary7Dr @msabouri @dirk_fasshauer @crabb_vicki @archie57426 @mercutioad @barryjohnreid21 @NeverV82625 @JKelleyK @Kristos416 @zee_parody @jilel76 @Mike6150817700 @Veeteejay1 @Charlie81789387 @Pouldeau61 @Yaboot710 @swords_mr @GhostOfChaplin @EyeOfTheMagi @ckellywpg @HossmanOfficial @epigeneticallyj @AbbyMaeKat @lavalmxhr @RobbiePNoCap @mcfunny @VaxPaparazzi @tcjepson @karleastlondon @Cloud7Connected I can't believe you aren't aware of this but here you go. https://t.co/o3u3NflMlt
8/ The key ethical principle is equipoise: if evidence shows one option is superior, you must offer it. This is the same reason COVID vaccine trials were unblinded after early results. (Pfizer: NEJM 2020; DOI:10.1056/NEJMoa2034577)
4/ The COVID vaccine RCTs did start with placebo-controlled designs. Unblinding occurred only after strong evidence of benefit, which ethically requires offering the superior option. (Pfizer: NEJM 2020, DOI:10.1056/NEJMoa2034577) (Moderna: NEJM 2021, DOI:10.1056/NEJMoa2035389)
@Elkstone14879 @RogerGustafsso2 @wexlerwriting You asked for one double-blind placebo-controlled trial. Here are four — all peer-reviewed, all used for regulatory approval. ⸻ 1️⃣ Polack et al., NEJM 2020 – Pfizer (BNT162b2) “Safety and Efficacy of the BNT162b2 mRNA Covid-19 Vaccine.” •43,548 participants •Randomised,
@VeritasPrimor @jneill @TakethatCt @rw_christian @Moosepiss1 No efficacy data? You're a fucking moron. What's long term for vaccines? How can there be herd immunity when population level seropositivity was about 9—10% at the end of 2020? https://t.co/Blv5KqYL1S https://t.co/mVdkNBTQ6n https://t.co/cgoPDV9SpW
@ninotnav @Beatrice_Rosen https://t.co/GvdRAYGkjm Tx mortalité moyen = 0.53% 21720 pers
@Kuroi_Yahu @T_Hideyan 第3相臨床試験の詳細はNEJM掲載の論文で、重症COVID-19に対する有効性が約90%以上確認されています：https://t.co/y4Wz9tS4UR。デルタ株期の実世界データでは、入院予防効果が96%と報告：https://t.co/V7FDJEwGy3。オミクロン期ブースターの重症化リスク低減（70-90%）は複数研究で裏付けられ、例とし
@LeslieManookian @DrNeilStone Placebo trial of the first pfizer mRNA covid vaccine https://t.co/XBrLprdfI4
@weelizzie6 @JimFergusonUK Of course PCR was used in the trials. Here’s Pfizer’s: https://t.co/cfAJIw8eiL. Look for the phrase “nucleic acid amplification”…
@ValerieAnne1970 Placebo safety trials were performed with 43,000 people. Read it and weep. You’re anti science. https://t.co/LFghi9tdJG
RT @HagarDer: @AnwaltUlbrich Das ist ein Auszug aus dem Pfizer-Biontec-Studienprotokoll. Schon ab Punkt 8.3. ff (explizit 8.3.5) wird auf d…
RT @TheSGEM: @ValerieAnne1970 "Vaccines are the only pharmaceutical drugs without placebo trials." It appears this claim is not accurate.…
@ValerieAnne1970 You will note in the supplementary material it identifies the placebo as a “saline placebo” & says it is 0.9% sodium chloride (normal saline). Do you accept now the claim was false/inaccurate? https://t.co/yIaCeM4fcs
RT @HagarDer: @AnwaltUlbrich Das ist ein Auszug aus dem Pfizer-Biontec-Studienprotokoll. Schon ab Punkt 8.3. ff (explizit 8.3.5) wird auf d…
@ValerieAnne1970 "Vaccines are the only pharmaceutical drugs without placebo trials." It appears this claim is not accurate. https://t.co/PJZiszZaqP https://t.co/vxBLiNt8CC
@AnwaltUlbrich Das ist ein Auszug aus dem Pfizer-Biontec-Studienprotokoll. Schon ab Punkt 8.3. ff (explizit 8.3.5) wird auf die Möglichkeit von Shedding durch Haut-, Atem- & sexuelle Kontakte & deren Meldepflicht auf Dauer der Studie hingewiesen
@hikariSararan ワクチンができたての2020年12月に出た論文できちんと言及されているのに、反ワクチン派はそれをガン無視しているだけです。 encoding the SARS-CoV-2 full-length spike, modified by two proline mutations to lock it in the prefusion conformation と説明されています。 https://t.co/NgpUn02YXv
@Rogue_Coach @dockaurG It is. I believe the first major clinical study was at the end of 2020. Quite a few after that. https://t.co/8TyF1XZ1C5
@francois101com @ChristianVolle @VirusWar Où sont ces maladies cardiaques ? ( 44000 personnes enrôlées). Suivis par une rétro analyse de toutes les vaccinations UK. https://t.co/OgttQdYaJx
実際,効果50%⇨90%
コロナ感染症状を副作用と誤認 特に2回目
@ment_leo @liquidsnake4ch @DocteurPEB1 @Grock Les essais pivot des vaccins ARNm (Pfizer/Moderna) montrent une efficacité de 95 % contre les infections symptomatiques et quasi 100 % contre les formes graves (NEJM, doi:10.1056/NEJMoa2034577 pour Pfizer ; doi:10.1056/NEJMoa2035389 pour Moderna). Des méta-analyses en vie réelle
@JBTC1971 @laralogan @GoingRoguewLara @delbigtree https://t.co/Zp9ffUi9bg
RT @tatiann69922625: Rappel : Étude comparant les personnes vaccinées et non vaccinées. https://t.co/f66IrLBuWv L'étude de référence (ess…
@grok @JanTakje_II @marcspeelman @DongenJean @Kevin_McKernan @elonmusk @grok= pharma-bot INCORRECT 2 verschillende productieprocessen Covid-19 modRNA. Alléén proces 2 gebruikte plasmids. https://t.co/42lWkZryxe vid: https://t.co/E6fry5ph5q INCORRECT "Er is geen onderzoek naar genotoxiciteit of carcinogeniciteit uitgevoerd." https://t.co/OPIiiWhUms
RT @tatiann69922625: Rappel : Étude comparant les personnes vaccinées et non vaccinées. https://t.co/f66IrLBuWv L'étude de référence (ess…
RT @tatiann69922625: Rappel : Étude comparant les personnes vaccinées et non vaccinées. https://t.co/f66IrLBuWv L'étude de référence (ess…
RT @tatiann69922625: Rappel : Étude comparant les personnes vaccinées et non vaccinées. https://t.co/f66IrLBuWv L'étude de référence (ess…
RT @tatiann69922625: Rappel : Étude comparant les personnes vaccinées et non vaccinées. https://t.co/f66IrLBuWv L'étude de référence (ess…
RT @tatiann69922625: Rappel : Étude comparant les personnes vaccinées et non vaccinées. https://t.co/f66IrLBuWv L'étude de référence (ess…
RT @tatiann69922625: Rappel : Étude comparant les personnes vaccinées et non vaccinées. https://t.co/f66IrLBuWv L'étude de référence (ess…
RT @tatiann69922625: Rappel : Étude comparant les personnes vaccinées et non vaccinées. https://t.co/f66IrLBuWv L'étude de référence (ess…
RT @tatiann69922625: Rappel : Étude comparant les personnes vaccinées et non vaccinées. https://t.co/f66IrLBuWv L'étude de référence (ess…
Rappel : Étude comparant les personnes vaccinées et non vaccinées. https://t.co/f66IrLBuWv L'étude de référence (essai contrôlé randomisé en double aveugle) a montré davantage de problèmes cardiaques et de décès chez les personnes vaccinées que chez les personnes non vaccinées. https://t.co/KY8mFZ9hfy https://t.co/5iE85NNZ1w
RT @__luzid__: @my_65stang https://t.co/NuW7cSahJJ
@DenisMiche74455 @PharmaMedic95 @leGeneral_off @EPhilippe_LH Non testé ? 44000 personnes enrôlées dans l'étude du Cominarty : rien, jamais, ne fut plus testé. Et prix Nobel de médecine 2023 ... https://t.co/OgttQdYaJx
@my_65stang https://t.co/NuW7cSahJJ
@gnometweeter https://t.co/NuW7cSahJJ
@Samsoule64 @PharmaMedic95 @leGeneral_off @EPhilippe_LH Quels seraient les tests supplémentaires en plus de ceux publiés en novembre 2020 que vous jugeriez indispensables pour ne plus considérer les vaccins 'expérimentaux' ? (Rappel : prix Nobel de médecine 2023) https://t.co/OgttQdYaJx
RT @cox_steeve: Les résultats existent, ils sont publics et révisés par les pairs. Pfizer, Moderna, Lancet, NEJM, CDC, OMS : réduction du r…
RT @cox_steeve: Les résultats existent, ils sont publics et révisés par les pairs. Pfizer, Moderna, Lancet, NEJM, CDC, OMS : réduction du r…
@EllEssDee1 The media lied 2 you and politicians did so too, stop defending them. Scientists said it was 95% against the ORIGINAL variant (and subsequent variants 4 boosters made post 2022) They did not promise immunity from future variants. Here's the 1st study: https://t.co/k3YuI1Ad84
RT @cox_steeve: Les résultats existent, ils sont publics et révisés par les pairs. Pfizer, Moderna, Lancet, NEJM, CDC, OMS : réduction du r…
@JGisSatoshi @cremieuxrecueil https://t.co/onBPgjEXhS” https://t.co/xQr2gYST6E https://t.co/TMqsn1eqYj
RT @cox_steeve: Les résultats existent, ils sont publics et révisés par les pairs. Pfizer, Moderna, Lancet, NEJM, CDC, OMS : réduction du r…
RT @cox_steeve: Les résultats existent, ils sont publics et révisés par les pairs. Pfizer, Moderna, Lancet, NEJM, CDC, OMS : réduction du r…
RT @cox_steeve: Les résultats existent, ils sont publics et révisés par les pairs. Pfizer, Moderna, Lancet, NEJM, CDC, OMS : réduction du r…
RT @cox_steeve: Les résultats existent, ils sont publics et révisés par les pairs. Pfizer, Moderna, Lancet, NEJM, CDC, OMS : réduction du r…
Les résultats existent, ils sont publics et révisés par les pairs. Pfizer, Moderna, Lancet, NEJM, CDC, OMS : réduction du risque de forme grave de 85 à 95 % chez les personnes âgées ou à comorbidités. Suffisait juste de chercher au lieu de tweeter. https://t.co/uDp4Rc3a6h https://t.co/KJ31NBrhXK
@KevinLomax19018 @BFMTV Effectivement https://t.co/OgttQdXCTZ
@DeAlmeidaDamie4 @BFMTV Et c’est vrai … ( sauf sur le Facebook de Lulu51937) https://t.co/OgttQdXCTZ
@sylviotte @BFMTV Effectivement les vaccins ARNm sont efficaces et sans risque. https://t.co/OgttQdXCTZ
RT @Sabisteb: Why does nobody sue for cretraction due to fraud auf the following paper? Safety and Efficacy of the BNT162b2 mRNA Covid-19 V…
@Takapide3310 @santabarbara118 この論文のここが重要ね。試験に出るよ "encoding the SARS-CoV-2 full-length spike, modified by two proline mutations to lock it in the prefusion conformation" https://t.co/NgpUn02YXv
@JGisSatoshi @cremieuxrecueil Pfizer RCT: 0 COVID deaths (vax) vs 9 (placebo). Moderna: 0 vs 3. That’s literally fewer deaths. You can’t run long-term placebo trials mid-pandemic, that's unethical. FactCheck cites data, not propaganda. Accountability exists through VICP. NEJM: https://t.co/pkfNT2ekYp”
@s1othlovechunk @ChildrensHD None of the deaths were related to the vaccine. https://t.co/YMj1nCguoy
@WakeUpSleepies @sjs856 @RonPaulUtah https://t.co/vTZtSM5LhH idk what you're talking about, this is the original 2020 study conducted under Trump's warp speed rules that prompted approval for the Pfizer vaccine.
@mpc_xetts @jemmm85517813 @drtexdi @IanCopeland5 @Ortho_Bro_Bro @rohangilkes @Jikkyleaks He's aware of "peer-reviewed" papers authored by stockholders of companies producing products being assessed. To wit: One of the most-viewed New England Journal of Medicine articles- 10.1056/NEJMoa2034577 ...check disclisures ≈1/2 hold Pfizer stock.
@TarboilerBill @DrNeilStone If you don't know what to think, you can do a quick Internet search. For instance, Google quickly finds articles on placebo-controlled Covid vaccine trials, like these: https://t.co/G475chqEKw https://t.co/5rl1D5dU3T
@Toma_Cersei @2_expat Et pan, prix Nobel de médecine 2023… https://t.co/OgttQdXCTZ
RT @5rHxIhQGQnnRSOe: またソース、ソース言うバカの為にソース貼っとく。 6.1.1. Manufacturing Process https://t.co/XJjIrOlZOZ https://t.co/w8TzCiUWel
またソース、ソース言うバカの為にソース貼っとく。 6.1.1. Manufacturing Process https://t.co/XJjIrOlZOZ https://t.co/w8TzCiUWel
@Chiwee98 @RWMaloneMD Right... And there are no atoms or molecules... https://t.co/S2miJhFGfu https://t.co/nfTGNP6y0w
@SergeantLevitt @harryfisherEMTP @JamesDOlimpio2 He claims to be seeing things. You basically want people to just take his word for it. No eivdence needed. Also, the clinical trials were completed. https://t.co/Hitq8Ktbic There you go, peer reviewed. In a proper journal.
RT @kingradeon: 今日映画を見て気になった。 >「ヒポクラテスの盲点」という映画で森内浩之氏が引用した論文は、フェルナンド・P・ポラックらが2020年12月10日にニューイングランド・ジャーナル・オブ・メディシンに発表した「Safety and Efficacy…
@gendansolo @michaelryan756 @DocAhmadMalik https://t.co/S2miJhFGfu https://t.co/nfTGNP6y0w
@elogfortruth @relativetrend @DrJaredWesley Starting five years ago, there have been plenty of published studies showing the vaccines are safe and effective. https://t.co/CP5VRhZnaV
@Mikeranger27 @Humanspective there were more deaths in the placebo group than the vaxxed group. https://t.co/Zp9ffUi9bg
@DanWall64 @Vox_Aeon @michaelryan756 @DocAhmadMalik https://t.co/S2miJhFGfu https://t.co/nfTGNP6y0w
@DanWall64 @gendansolo @michaelryan756 @DocAhmadMalik 1. Thomas SJ, Moreira ED Jr, Kitchin N, et al. Safety and Efficacy of the BNT162b2 mRNA Covid-19 Vaccine through 6 Months. N Engl J Med 2021; 385:1761.
@DanWall64 @gendansolo @michaelryan756 @DocAhmadMalik 1. Polack FP, Thomas SJ, Kitchin N, et al. Safety and Efficacy of the BNT162b2 mRNA Covid-19 Vaccine. N Engl J Med 2020; 383:2603.
@Bas4runner @jhartdc @DrNeilStone Yes, they did go through randomised clinical trials and had extensive safety and efficacy trials. https://t.co/fgg3DfnwnM https://t.co/cbXcoSyBjN I can add more. So now you know you're wrong, would you like to admit they are in fact properly cerified for safety and efficacy?
@ChildrensHD He didn’t experience any negative effects but wouldn’t do it again. Btw, here is how I decided to get the c19 vaccine. https://t.co/j5TTL5phz9
@crianza @DrNeilStone https://t.co/vQm0AMujeA
@Renaiss98089929 @Santiagolenador @MariCarmen0407 Los datos de ese estudio se publicaron el 10 de diciembre de 2020. https://t.co/Nokt53a7tz
@sebingomez1 @RafaeldeCruces @mermarhuer @Farmaenfurecida Éste es el estudio revisado por pares que se publicó el 10 de diciembre de 2020 con los datos que entonces se tenían. https://t.co/Nokt53a7tz
@Justin130140668 @jengleruk @AaronSiriSG The LNP be pro inflammatory is actually advantageous since it doesn’t require additional adjuvant that anti-vax hate for reasons. Also all the trials for mRNA vaccines (not gene therapies) absolutely used saline for placebo. You can’t read. https://t.co/ITej8pSnOp https://t.co/uS08vRGcdt
RT @canceledmouse: In the development of its COVID-19 vaccine candidate, BNT162b2 (commercially known as Comirnaty), Pfizer/BioNTech used t…
@EschatologyFB @DrNeilStone This took 30 seconds to find by the way: https://t.co/iNifuOR2EN
@J_Kidd17 @grok @EtorGiacoia @836433de0d2041d @Fa21519230 Pero se refiere a este ensayo aún en curso y publicado por los propios investigadores de Pfizer, y dónde queda la revisión por pares
RT @Sabisteb: Why does nobody sue for cretraction due to fraud auf the following paper? Safety and Efficacy of the BNT162b2 mRNA Covid-19 V…
RT @Sabisteb: Why does nobody sue for cretraction due to fraud auf the following paper? Safety and Efficacy of the BNT162b2 mRNA Covid-19 V…
RT @Sabisteb: Why does nobody sue for cretraction due to fraud auf the following paper? Safety and Efficacy of the BNT162b2 mRNA Covid-19 V…
RT @Sabisteb: Why does nobody sue for cretraction due to fraud auf the following paper? Safety and Efficacy of the BNT162b2 mRNA Covid-19 V…
RT @Sabisteb: Why does nobody sue for cretraction due to fraud auf the following paper? Safety and Efficacy of the BNT162b2 mRNA Covid-19 V…
Why does nobody sue for cretraction due to fraud auf the following paper? Safety and Efficacy of the BNT162b2 mRNA Covid-19 Vaccine. N Engl J Med. 2020 https://t.co/Uz1BF1B9TW What would happen if it was to be retracted due to fraud?
@13thJonny @angie_rasmussen here you go: https://t.co/8NK0R5b7p0
@grok @Bakaburg1 @elder_plinius Phase 3: saline placebo + ~95% efficacy. Yes? If yes, stop implying Pfizer’s pivotal trial lacked inert controls. 2/8 https://t.co/q3Iy0Hyorb
@grok @Bakaburg1 @elder_plinius 5/10 “Trials lacked inert placebos.” False. Pfizer’s pivotal Phase 3 used a saline placebo; efficacy ≈95% with strong safety monitoring. https://t.co/q3Iy0Hyorb
@Itelman_Edi @IdoWolf1 @YaffaRaz מעולה. תראה לי איך. הנה שוב הלינק: https://t.co/bhFNSDGEfB כמה נפגעים קשה/קל בכל קבוצה?
@silentrunning10 No kidding Vader was evil. https://t.co/MfXReNA9P2
@DanielNatal18 https://t.co/MfXReNA9P2
@latheef_ashiya @Nihaattey Process 2 manufacturing is a well-known issue. And you can read about it in Pfizer's own documents. Here is one - https://t.co/xQyuDPjL9w Vaccine manufacturers who have been convicted and have paid billions of dollars in criminal fines. And who are immune from liability for
@HarryGundt @jeffreyatucker 1. Thomas SJ, Moreira ED Jr, Kitchin N, et al. Safety and Efficacy of the BNT162b2 mRNA Covid-19 Vaccine through 6 Months. N Engl J Med 2021; 385:1761.
@HarryGundt @jeffreyatucker 1. Polack FP, Thomas SJ, Kitchin N, et al. Safety and Efficacy of the BNT162b2 mRNA Covid-19 Vaccine. N Engl J Med 2020; 383:2603.
@UptownHobo @Rumdrinks4all @NicHulscher Here’s the paper on the Pfizer/BioNtech study: https://t.co/jokmHF42M9
@PGtzsche1 Wasn't this a placebo-controlled trial? https://t.co/1YJeWY5HCX https://t.co/c5lxtHy5lo
今日映画を見て気になった。 >「ヒポクラテスの盲点」という映画で森内浩之氏が引用した論文は、フェルナンド・P・ポラックらが2020年12月10日にニューイングランド・ジャーナル・オブ・メディシンに発表した「Safety and Efficacy of the BNT162b2 mRNA Covid-19 Vaccine」である可能性が高い https://t.co/cQckVhoF98
@inform_ts @minamiyoro @domperip3 @tabinidetain @noa_nero @majime_nyanko @PO1tClkrnTlznsi @ZlZabcAmcfTRtCF @UfOrUBZo4T3HcWq @YOUSato64 @ShoichiYokoyoko @Z42Be @yuyake03 @yukimuluv @parcorixer @sinebalta @hasi50215021 @rnHZo8uwzbvtqH5 @oyukihan1126 @motoziizasdesu @coronafarce_os @hide444f https://t.co/ItOLAomJjs これです。 該当の表はAppedixにあります。
@lcamilocs Nadie mintió y en su momento los antivacunas estuvieron de moda. Hasta la evaluación de la FDA es pública. https://t.co/TMCTbWihVY
@MisterSid4 @DrNeilStone There were clinical trials involving thousands of people and the data and results are published for everyone to read. This is "Safety and Efficacy of the BNT162b2 mRNA Covid-19 Vaccine" from the New England Journal of Medicine https://t.co/SByADFuIue
@DavidWallWA @simonmaechling This is "Safety and Efficacy of the BNT162b2 mRNA Covid-19 Vaccine" from the New England Journal of Medicine: https://t.co/SByADFuIue
@BigfootBowtied @BGatesIsaPyscho 1. Thomas SJ, Moreira ED Jr, Kitchin N, et al. Safety and Efficacy of the BNT162b2 mRNA Covid-19 Vaccine through 6 Months. N Engl J Med 2021; 385:1761.
@BigfootBowtied @BGatesIsaPyscho 1. Polack FP, Thomas SJ, Kitchin N, et al. Safety and Efficacy of the BNT162b2 mRNA Covid-19 Vaccine. N Engl J Med 2020; 383:2603.
人の記憶があいまいになったころ合いを見て、こういうことをしてくるのか。 有効性（発症予防効果）と安全性（副反応）。当時はニュースでも大々的にやったでしょう https://t.co/0RPoSdSuSn 時系列はワクチン分科会の資料を読みましょう https://t.co/s4md9V1Mm4 https://t.co/EUTgPYsMlr
@BeaLawson27 @grok @jojo49547318 @DrNeilStone NEJM "Safety and Efficacy of the BNT162b2 mRNA Covid-19 Vaccine" by Polack, F. P., et al. December 31 2020 An Evidence-Based Approach to Covid-19 Vaccination" by Woodcock, J., et al. September 15 2023 Nature "Efficacy and Safety of COVID-19 Vaccines: A Systematic Review"...
@swadlad @grok @jojo49547318 @DrNeilStone WHO and CDC are VERY credible organisations. I'm wanting actual source STUDIES which I found elsewhere: 2021 Lancet analysis of mRNA vaccines 2022 NEJM study on Moderna, 2023 BMJ review Plus: NEJM: - "Safety and Efficacy of the BNT162b2 mRNA Covid-19 Vaccine" by...
@CaptBop2112 @doclauravater 1. Polack FP, Thomas SJ, Kitchin N, et al. Safety and Efficacy of the BNT162b2 mRNA Covid-19 Vaccine. N Engl J Med 2020; 383:2603.
RT @BluesRunner2: @filipporicci72 @ierogamos @fuoridalcorotv @CnMarianna Ma non è vero e dire una palese falsità (fu pubblicato sul NEJM lo…
@ThePeplesLobby @docchai2022 @mbotforcongress @HoldFast2Right The original Phase 3 trial study for the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine is: Polack, F. P., et al. (2020). Safety and Efficacy of the BNT162b2 mRNA Covid-19 Vaccine. New England Journal of Medicine, 383(27), 2603-2615. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa2034577. It reported 95% efficacy
@laurent_NWO Étude en double aveugle (44000 personnes enrôlées) de l’efficacité et de la sécurité du BNT162b2 ( ‘vaccin Pfizer’ en language neuneu). https://t.co/wVGzwU6EnW
@Jikkyleaks @DIY_Tardis @RealDrJaneRuby @weldeiry @RetsefL @KUPERWASSERLAB @RWMaloneMD @MaryanneDemasi @US_FDA @CDCgov @NIHDirector_Jay @DrMakaryFDA @RobertKennedyJr @grok @KevinMcCairnPhD @CoyoteSanctuary Because the vaccine does not increase the risk of infection but reduces this risk (and the risk of severe COVID). Plenty of RCTs demonstrate this. Example: https://t.co/PgE8qwtmyG
@NHLiPZdTEOTnGrU @Lunabouquet @dr_manami @meimei881 @ktslider1 @nontan3135 あと研究レポートを "探して" "読む" 能力が 基本的にないだけだと思います。 すでの2020年末には重要な内容は公開されているので。 それを5年間も国の所為にしているというのは、 ただの御門違いでしかないと。 https://t.co/2xoJDNhYd8
@heathenbog @CarmeloTallasT @MidwesternDoc A little light reading for you https://t.co/OizSFzJX1w
@DailyDoseFeed_ @DrPaulOffit @statnews The highest quality research are randomized controlled trials For the 2 mRNA vaccines early in the pandemic, they found 95% reduction in symptomatic COVID https://t.co/Wnhqsf8iHp /2
@RosieM1276203 @grok @NurseMicheleRN @NicHulscher What about them I’ve read them Have you read this? https://t.co/3W7Oe8Yac6
@RosieM1276203 @NurseMicheleRN @NicHulscher @grok Start with this one Not just the headline https://t.co/3W7Oe8Yac6
@lou_liberty99 @MdBreathe @POTUS "Estimated....." It ended Nov 2020. Here is the publication in Dec 2020 showing the results of the phase 3 trial https://t.co/tk3YFa1IBy
@RikLesel @sayerjigmi https://t.co/S2miJhF8pW https://t.co/nfTGNP60aY
@RikLesel @sayerjigmi 1. Thomas SJ, Moreira ED Jr, Kitchin N, et al. Safety and Efficacy of the BNT162b2 mRNA Covid-19 Vaccine through 6 Months. N Engl J Med 2021; 385:1761.
@RikLesel @sayerjigmi 1. Polack FP, Thomas SJ, Kitchin N, et al. Safety and Efficacy of the BNT162b2 mRNA Covid-19 Vaccine. N Engl J Med 2020; 383:2603.
@Runningmansuzie @PVingaard @toobaffled https://t.co/yyeAYPOrYQ Stop lying.
@Runningmansuzie @Dgaganche1984 @toobaffled You are wrong. The Pfizer study showed it vaccine to be “95% effective against Covid-19”. That is: The symptomatic disease. https://t.co/cfAJIw7Gtd Claiming stuff about infection or transmission from this paper would be wrong - other studies have investigated such, though.
@Runningmansuzie @VaccineWaters74 @toobaffled https://t.co/yyeAYPOrYQ stop lying.
@chatswithem @grok @naomirwolf Show me where Pfizer data showed negative efficacy and more deaths in the vaccine group. https://t.co/oRHsy0sq2M
@NotImportant300 @atrupar https://t.co/vQm0AMtLp2
@LadJust18 @notinuse24583 @mereeseman @VoteGloriaJ Mrna vaccine research has existed since the 60’s and has been proven to be safe and effective, just say you don’t know how to do research https://t.co/isJ0ROMPWt https://t.co/35IjEHQRUC https://t.co/BLIM8Tv5zd
@newstart_2024 All of the approved #COVID_19 #vaccines have been through Phase I, II and III human clinical trails. #Pfizer Phase III clinical trial data were published in Dec 2020, 95% efficacy against original covid compared to placebo vaccinated controls, good safety https://t.co/iqxV4fpZ6Z
- **データの一貫性**: PfizerとBioNTechの報告書（[Safety and Efficacy of the BNT162b2 mRNA Covid-19 Vaccine](https://t.co/HZs5ZpxFSl)）には、2021年までのワクチン接種データが記載されていますが、Fosunからの具体的な10億回分の配布に関する言及はありません。
Pfizerの文書（[Safety and Efficacy of the BNT162b2 mRNA Covid-19 Vaccine](https://t.co/HZs5ZpxFSl)）には、深刻な副作用のデータが詳細に記載されており、Wolfの主張を裏付ける根拠となっています。
@KarenBearss @BusyDrT There were saline placebos when testing the covid vaccine. Try again with facts next time. https://t.co/LFghi9sFU8
@gdisacco1 @DanieleScalea @acnewsitics https://t.co/HVCuhkS1XN https://t.co/pauTjsCKom https://t.co/FzHcHFKT70 https://t.co/NRf1cOkLoF
@Charlie40074981 @VUsuxballs @harryfisherEMTP @PierreKory @stkirsch 11/ References 1.Polack FP, et al. Safety and Efficacy of the BNT162b2 mRNA Covid-19 Vaccine. NEJM. 2020;383:2603-2615. [PMID: 33301246] 2.Thomas SJ, et al. Safety and Efficacy of the BNT162b2 Vaccine through 6 Months. NEJM. 2021;385:1761-1773. [PMID: 34525277]
@BB4294842972954 @RandomGirl_420 @AliaVFF @idahocountrydoc First two covid trials used saline placebos and randomized >75,000 people: https://t.co/S2miJhFGfu https://t.co/nfTGNP6y0w
RT @IntegralAnswers: 11/ Vaccine outcomes: • Polack FP et al. “Safety and Efficacy of the BNT162b2 mRNA Covid-19 Vaccine.” NEJM. 2020. [PMI…
On this day in COVID history, September 15, 2021: Safety and Efficacy of the BNT162b2 mRNA Covid-19 Vaccine through 6 Months Source: The New England Journal of Medicine https://t.co/o4vEejMSGX
On this day in COVID history, September 15, 2021: Safety and Efficacy of the BNT162b2 mRNA Covid-19 Vaccine through 6 Months Source: The New England Journal of Medicine https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMoa2110345
11/ Vaccine outcomes: • Polack FP et al. “Safety and Efficacy of the BNT162b2 mRNA Covid-19 Vaccine.” NEJM. 2020. [PMID: 33301246] • Baden LR et al. “Efficacy and Safety of the mRNA-1273 Vaccine.” NEJM. 2021. [PMID: 33378609]
@AutismClassAct @newstart_2024 Here you are. True saline placebo and no increase in adverse events. now where you gonna move the goal post to? https://t.co/uXKGdiUrYp
RT @Chamchamat: @marcomackill @lonnibesancon 1- c'était écrit dans l'essai clinique https://t.co/VX4ubxlb5J 2-Meme Olivier Veran l'a dit…
@bibinhafc @GiggaMAGA @WaitingForPerot @ECUBrodySOM All of the approved COVID vaccines have been through Phase I, II and III human clinical trails. Pfizer Phase III clinical trial data were published in Dec 2020, 95% efficacy against original covid compared to placebo vaccinated controls, good safety https://t.co/iqxV4fqwWx
@bibinhafc @GiggaMAGA @WaitingForPerot @ECUBrodySOM All of the approved COVID vaccines have been through Phase I, II and III human clinical trails. Pfizer Phase III clinical trial data were published in Dec 2020, 95% efficacy against original covid compared to placebo vaccinated controls, good safety https://t.co/iqxV4fqwWx
@marcomackill @lonnibesancon 1- c'était écrit dans l'essai clinique https://t.co/VX4ubxlb5J 2-Meme Olivier Veran l'a dit décembre 2020, avant la commercialisation du vaccin, qu'on n'avait aucune garantie sur la transmission. https://t.co/DEBc2ShZUD
@LucianoJannone @lonnibesancon Waouh, Pfizer ne savait pas si le vaccin avait un effet sur la transmission ! Quel scoop ! Pas comme si c'était littéralement dit dans leur étude. https://t.co/gzGOiJNKDD
@adola9599 @hassanh20881712 @Tawarrow @Alerabineno @Dr__YAS غير صحيح، كلامي دقيق ومتوافق مع أغلبية الدراسات العلمية المنشورة من هيئات مختلفة. وهذه روابط لبعض الدراسات والنتائج للتجارب لعدة دول https://t.co/AUDaYCFG8s https://t.co/2ToCRPvHed https://t.co/uzhOQ72c22 https://t.co/pd1sxyiOVE توافق نتائج الدول المختلفة يثبت مصداقية
@geetrude12 I am using the word "disgusting" because that is the word that Aseem Malhotra used. As for a deep dive, I have made over 100 videos doing just that. Here's one of them looking specifically at Malhotra's claims: https://t.co/nSUVcrR7Uz
@filipporicci72 @ierogamos @fuoridalcorotv @CnMarianna Ma non è vero e dire una palese falsità (fu pubblicato sul NEJM lo studio completato dopo la fase III: link qui sotto) equivale a far credere che non erano stati sperimentali e ad appoggiare la bufala del "siero sperimentale". https://t.co/aQMEPNkNpI
@icthruyou2 @jonathanstea Source: https://t.co/29qaO3ZY8h
@emoterai @jonathanstea https://t.co/29qaO3ZY8h
@emoterai @jonathanstea Pfizer trial: https://t.co/29qaO3ZY8h
@zbingeldac @newstart_2024 Safety and Efficacy of the BNT162b2 mRNA Covid-19 Vaccine ◦DOI: https://t.co/vfTBa0oZ9T Safety and Immunogenicity of Two RNA-Based Covid-19 Vaccine Candidates DOI: https://t.co/3qm1xnC0xR Efficacy and Safety of the mRNA-1273 SARS-CoV-2 Vaccine ◦DOI: https://t.co/3AhQgEaXgU
@StuckInMiddleU @DrNeilStone Which the COVID and flu vaccines do. https://t.co/YMj1nCguoy
@JMaaan8989 @AnActualWizard @simonmaechling DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa2110345 DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa2034577 doi: 10.1038/s41467-024-50376-z. doi: 10.1186/s40249-021-00878-5. doi: 10.3390/vaccines11061118. There are plenty of studies available. Here’s the first five results I found!
@TaraBull808 All of the approved #covidvaccines have been through Phase I, II and III human clinical trails. Pfizer Phase III clinical trial data were published in Dec 2020, 95% efficacy against original covid compared to placebo vaccinated controls, good safety #rfjr https://t.co/iqxV4fqwWx
@CarloBasile17 @ClareCraigPath based on clinical trials https://t.co/YMj1nCguoy
@Keizudouga @kAb8dds3tf91112 @Fizz_DI @jinkamiya そして第3相は7月には始めたそうです。 https://t.co/SJQJUJQocQ
@SenSanders The Pfizer efficacy and safety trial had a two month follow up. They did not have a "true control" because of the "ethics" of not allowing volunteers to receive a vaccine for 2 years. It is the study design that some people would like to investigate. https://t.co/uNbMtuwM1r
@TabulaStellar @zerohedge I am equally curious what is holding him from publishing something already published? https://t.co/sxweMWpOlO https://t.co/A5pYc17orI
@wholeheart4god https://t.co/iGteDR7PcO
@BobHatchett @RealJoeBonanno @RandPaul https://t.co/S2miJhFGfu https://t.co/nfTGNP6y0w
@shdegaray73 Here is #6: https://t.co/wsk7uJDFhs
RT @DrSusanOliver1: Looks like Aseem Malhotra is lying about vaccines again. Here's a reminder that the science says otherwise: https://t.c…
@minamiyoro @goodluck1185 @usotsukiminami @Ta7kanob @sinebalta @PO1tClkrnTlznsi @alto502251 こういうのですか？ https://t.co/mczF8QPvj7
RT @DrSusanOliver1: Looks like Aseem Malhotra is lying about vaccines again. Here's a reminder that the science says otherwise: https://t.c…
RT @DrSusanOliver1: Looks like Aseem Malhotra is lying about vaccines again. Here's a reminder that the science says otherwise: https://t.c…
@TimothyNuell @WotsOnInfo @lawyeradams @RogerJStoneJr Look here: https://t.co/BRvLKbthLJ
@Prudent11 @JulieHughlett @DrNeilStone https://t.co/S2miJhFGfu https://t.co/nfTGNP6y0w
RT @DrSusanOliver1: Looks like Aseem Malhotra is lying about vaccines again. Here's a reminder that the science says otherwise: https://t.c…
@6fores1 @StoryBeats @MikebertPhD @drdrew Here's #9: https://t.co/wsk7uJDFhs
@MarkVipond @harry_horton tell you what Mark let's discuss and debate the original Pfizer trial, you have read it and worked through it, right? why don't we start with all the deaths, exclusions and claimed efficacy? ready when you are https://t.co/QaSpl1WjKX
tell you what Don, let's discuss and debate the original Pfizer trial, you have read it and worked through it, right? why don't we start with the deaths, exclusions and claimed efficacy? ready when you are https://t.co/QaSpl1WjKX https://t.co/woV1X6hgx8
@donmcgowan @alan_muso tell you what Don, let's discuss and debate the original Pfizer trial, you have read it and worked through it, right? why don't we start with the deaths, exclusions and claimed efficacy? ready when you are https://t.co/QaSpl1WjKX
RT @DrSusanOliver1: Looks like Aseem Malhotra is lying about vaccines again. Here's a reminder that the science says otherwise: https://t.c…
RT @DrSusanOliver1: Looks like Aseem Malhotra is lying about vaccines again. Here's a reminder that the science says otherwise: https://t.c…
RT @ImmortelleXIII: @verity_france La @HAS_sante savait, le 25 novembre 2020, que ces vaccins ne feraient pas produire d'anticorps parce qu…
RT @DrSusanOliver1: Looks like Aseem Malhotra is lying about vaccines again. Here's a reminder that the science says otherwise: https://t.c…
@sandboata @jakescottMD Yes, in the COVID vaccines too... https://t.co/4Nrp8YXO57
RT @DrSusanOliver1: Looks like Aseem Malhotra is lying about vaccines again. Here's a reminder that the science says otherwise: https://t.c…
RT @DrSusanOliver1: Looks like Aseem Malhotra is lying about vaccines again. Here's a reminder that the science says otherwise: https://t.c…
RT @DrSusanOliver1: Looks like Aseem Malhotra is lying about vaccines again. Here's a reminder that the science says otherwise: https://t.c…
@LeeCraddock12 @BearlyPolitics @reformparty_uk @TiceRichard Malhotra is a twisted grifter, that's why. He is dangerous. He made false claims about his father's death to support his ridiculous misinformation. And this: https://t.co/2uZcPvUSCL
RT @DrSusanOliver1: Looks like Aseem Malhotra is lying about vaccines again. Here's a reminder that the science says otherwise: https://t.c…
RT @DrSusanOliver1: Looks like Aseem Malhotra is lying about vaccines again. Here's a reminder that the science says otherwise: https://t.c…
RT @DrSusanOliver1: Looks like Aseem Malhotra is lying about vaccines again. Here's a reminder that the science says otherwise: https://t.c…
RT @DrSusanOliver1: Looks like Aseem Malhotra is lying about vaccines again. Here's a reminder that the science says otherwise: https://t.c…
@Kate14772198942 @jesgon0319 @JasonJournoDC @DailyCaller "Prove me otherwise" The Pfizer double blind study of more than 44,000 people showed that 162 people in the half that randomly got the placebo got Covid and 8 in the half that got the vax got Covid. This basically can't happen by chance. https://t.co/PBlekOL5dD
@WallStreetApes All of the approved COVID vaccines have been through Phase I, II and III human clinical trails. Pfizer Phase III clinical trial data were published in Dec 2020, 95% efficacy against original #Covid compared to placebo vaccinated controls, good safety https://t.co/iqxV4fqwWx
RT @DrSusanOliver1: Looks like Aseem Malhotra is lying about vaccines again. Here's a reminder that the science says otherwise: https://t.c…
RT @DrSusanOliver1: Looks like Aseem Malhotra is lying about vaccines again. Here's a reminder that the science says otherwise: https://t.c…
RT @DrSusanOliver1: Looks like Aseem Malhotra is lying about vaccines again. Here's a reminder that the science says otherwise: https://t.c…
@CarlWil15709384 @simonmaechling Covid vaccine went through phase II/III trials in more than 40,000 people before being authorised for general use https://t.co/usK6DwGBXV
@Rosalba_Falzone @fuoridalcorotv @CnMarianna Perché ti droghi? 44.000 volontari in fase 3 a doppio cieco. https://t.co/Ltt2MLBAvS
RT @DrSusanOliver1: Looks like Aseem Malhotra is lying about vaccines again. Here's a reminder that the science says otherwise: https://t.c…
RT @ImmortelleXIII: @verity_france La @HAS_sante savait, le 25 novembre 2020, que ces vaccins ne feraient pas produire d'anticorps parce qu…
RT @DrSusanOliver1: Looks like Aseem Malhotra is lying about vaccines again. Here's a reminder that the science says otherwise: https://t.c…
@CovfefeDnUnder @CaseyDeSantis Safety and Efficacy of the BNT162b2 mRNA Covid-19 Vaccine Authors: Fernando P. Polack, M.D., Stephen J. Thomas, M.D., Nicholas Kitchin, M.D., Judith Absalon, M.D., Alejandra Gurtman, M.D., Stephen Lockhart, D.M., John L. Perez, M.D., +22 , for the C4591001 Clinical Trial
RT @DrSusanOliver1: Looks like Aseem Malhotra is lying about vaccines again. Here's a reminder that the science says otherwise: https://t.c…
RT @DrSusanOliver1: Looks like Aseem Malhotra is lying about vaccines again. Here's a reminder that the science says otherwise: https://t.c…
RT @DrSusanOliver1: Looks like Aseem Malhotra is lying about vaccines again. Here's a reminder that the science says otherwise: https://t.c…
RT @DrSusanOliver1: Looks like Aseem Malhotra is lying about vaccines again. Here's a reminder that the science says otherwise: https://t.c…
RT @DrSusanOliver1: Looks like Aseem Malhotra is lying about vaccines again. Here's a reminder that the science says otherwise: https://t.c…
RT @DrSusanOliver1: Looks like Aseem Malhotra is lying about vaccines again. Here's a reminder that the science says otherwise: https://t.c…
https://t.co/BGYzFSgfTt https://t.co/Wk1xYti0HS
RT @DrSusanOliver1: Looks like Aseem Malhotra is lying about vaccines again. Here's a reminder that the science says otherwise: https://t.c…
RT @DrSusanOliver1: Looks like Aseem Malhotra is lying about vaccines again. Here's a reminder that the science says otherwise: https://t.c…
RT @DrSusanOliver1: Looks like Aseem Malhotra is lying about vaccines again. Here's a reminder that the science says otherwise: https://t.c…
RT @DrSusanOliver1: Looks like Aseem Malhotra is lying about vaccines again. Here's a reminder that the science says otherwise: https://t.c…
@MartinZ_uncut Et comme Trump est un idiot finit qui n'écoute personne, ca va être de la rigolade ... Regardez, c'est écrit ⬇️ https://t.co/xDJLIHZfn2
RT @ImmortelleXIII: @verity_france La @HAS_sante savait, le 25 novembre 2020, que ces vaccins ne feraient pas produire d'anticorps parce qu…
RT @DrSusanOliver1: Looks like Aseem Malhotra is lying about vaccines again. Here's a reminder that the science says otherwise: https://t.c…
RT @DrSusanOliver1: Looks like Aseem Malhotra is lying about vaccines again. Here's a reminder that the science says otherwise: https://t.c…
RT @DrSusanOliver1: Looks like Aseem Malhotra is lying about vaccines again. Here's a reminder that the science says otherwise: https://t.c…
RT @DrSusanOliver1: Looks like Aseem Malhotra is lying about vaccines again. Here's a reminder that the science says otherwise: https://t.c…
RT @DrSusanOliver1: Looks like Aseem Malhotra is lying about vaccines again. Here's a reminder that the science says otherwise: https://t.c…
RT @DrSusanOliver1: Looks like Aseem Malhotra is lying about vaccines again. Here's a reminder that the science says otherwise: https://t.c…
RT @DrSusanOliver1: Looks like Aseem Malhotra is lying about vaccines again. Here's a reminder that the science says otherwise: https://t.c…
RT @DrSusanOliver1: Looks like Aseem Malhotra is lying about vaccines again. Here's a reminder that the science says otherwise: https://t.c…
RT @ImmortelleXIII: @verity_france La @HAS_sante savait, le 25 novembre 2020, que ces vaccins ne feraient pas produire d'anticorps parce qu…
RT @DrSusanOliver1: Looks like Aseem Malhotra is lying about vaccines again. Here's a reminder that the science says otherwise: https://t.c…
RT @ImmortelleXIII: @verity_france La @HAS_sante savait, le 25 novembre 2020, que ces vaccins ne feraient pas produire d'anticorps parce qu…
RT @DrSusanOliver1: Looks like Aseem Malhotra is lying about vaccines again. Here's a reminder that the science says otherwise: https://t.c…
RT @DrSusanOliver1: Looks like Aseem Malhotra is lying about vaccines again. Here's a reminder that the science says otherwise: https://t.c…
RT @DrSusanOliver1: Looks like Aseem Malhotra is lying about vaccines again. Here's a reminder that the science says otherwise: https://t.c…
RT @DrSusanOliver1: Looks like Aseem Malhotra is lying about vaccines again. Here's a reminder that the science says otherwise: https://t.c…
RT @DrSusanOliver1: Looks like Aseem Malhotra is lying about vaccines again. Here's a reminder that the science says otherwise: https://t.c…
RT @DrSusanOliver1: Looks like Aseem Malhotra is lying about vaccines again. Here's a reminder that the science says otherwise: https://t.c…
RT @DrSusanOliver1: Looks like Aseem Malhotra is lying about vaccines again. Here's a reminder that the science says otherwise: https://t.c…
RT @DrSusanOliver1: Looks like Aseem Malhotra is lying about vaccines again. Here's a reminder that the science says otherwise: https://t.c…
RT @DrSusanOliver1: Looks like Aseem Malhotra is lying about vaccines again. Here's a reminder that the science says otherwise: https://t.c…
RT @DrSusanOliver1: Looks like Aseem Malhotra is lying about vaccines again. Here's a reminder that the science says otherwise: https://t.c…
RT @DrSusanOliver1: Looks like Aseem Malhotra is lying about vaccines again. Here's a reminder that the science says otherwise: https://t.c…
RT @DrSusanOliver1: Looks like Aseem Malhotra is lying about vaccines again. Here's a reminder that the science says otherwise: https://t.c…
RT @DrSusanOliver1: Looks like Aseem Malhotra is lying about vaccines again. Here's a reminder that the science says otherwise: https://t.c…
RT @DrSusanOliver1: Looks like Aseem Malhotra is lying about vaccines again. Here's a reminder that the science says otherwise: https://t.c…
RT @DrSusanOliver1: Looks like Aseem Malhotra is lying about vaccines again. Here's a reminder that the science says otherwise: https://t.c…
RT @DrSusanOliver1: Looks like Aseem Malhotra is lying about vaccines again. Here's a reminder that the science says otherwise: https://t.c…
RT @DrSusanOliver1: Looks like Aseem Malhotra is lying about vaccines again. Here's a reminder that the science says otherwise: https://t.c…
RT @DrSusanOliver1: Looks like Aseem Malhotra is lying about vaccines again. Here's a reminder that the science says otherwise: https://t.c…
RT @DrSusanOliver1: Looks like Aseem Malhotra is lying about vaccines again. Here's a reminder that the science says otherwise: https://t.c…
RT @DrSusanOliver1: Looks like Aseem Malhotra is lying about vaccines again. Here's a reminder that the science says otherwise: https://t.c…
RT @DrSusanOliver1: Looks like Aseem Malhotra is lying about vaccines again. Here's a reminder that the science says otherwise: https://t.c…
RT @DrSusanOliver1: Looks like Aseem Malhotra is lying about vaccines again. Here's a reminder that the science says otherwise: https://t.c…
RT @DrSusanOliver1: Looks like Aseem Malhotra is lying about vaccines again. Here's a reminder that the science says otherwise: https://t.c…
RT @DrSusanOliver1: Looks like Aseem Malhotra is lying about vaccines again. Here's a reminder that the science says otherwise: https://t.c…
RT @DrSusanOliver1: Looks like Aseem Malhotra is lying about vaccines again. Here's a reminder that the science says otherwise: https://t.c…
RT @DrSusanOliver1: Looks like Aseem Malhotra is lying about vaccines again. Here's a reminder that the science says otherwise: https://t.c…
RT @DrSusanOliver1: Looks like Aseem Malhotra is lying about vaccines again. Here's a reminder that the science says otherwise: https://t.c…
RT @DrSusanOliver1: Looks like Aseem Malhotra is lying about vaccines again. Here's a reminder that the science says otherwise: https://t.c…
RT @ImmortelleXIII: @verity_france La @HAS_sante savait, le 25 novembre 2020, que ces vaccins ne feraient pas produire d'anticorps parce qu…
Looks like Aseem Malhotra is lying about vaccines again. Here's a reminder that the science says otherwise: https://t.co/8J9jOzu03b
RT @ImmortelleXIII: @verity_france La @HAS_sante savait, le 25 novembre 2020, que ces vaccins ne feraient pas produire d'anticorps parce qu…
RT @DeanBaker13: @MarcGoldwein Actually, two people who got the vaccine died, compared to four in the control group https://t.co/b5b00PckqN…
RT @ImmortelleXIII: @verity_france La @HAS_sante savait, le 25 novembre 2020, que ces vaccins ne feraient pas produire d'anticorps parce qu…
RT @ImmortelleXIII: @verity_france La @HAS_sante savait, le 25 novembre 2020, que ces vaccins ne feraient pas produire d'anticorps parce qu…
RT @ImmortelleXIII: @verity_france La @HAS_sante savait, le 25 novembre 2020, que ces vaccins ne feraient pas produire d'anticorps parce qu…
RT @ImmortelleXIII: @verity_france La @HAS_sante savait, le 25 novembre 2020, que ces vaccins ne feraient pas produire d'anticorps parce qu…
@davostwatos @rowleythelegend @LBC @lewis_goodall COVID vaccines went through large-scale Phase 3 trials before rollout.
RT @ImmortelleXIII: @verity_france La @HAS_sante savait, le 25 novembre 2020, que ces vaccins ne feraient pas produire d'anticorps parce qu…
@verity_france La @HAS_sante savait, le 25 novembre 2020, que ces vaccins ne feraient pas produire d'anticorps parce qu'injectés dans le muscle, page 17 https://t.co/rW0xxY5OO3 et ce bien avant la publications des essais cliniques de Pfizer le 10 décembre 2020 https://t.co/xDJLIHZfn2
@KennethJolivet @clairlemon A placebo controlled clinical trail with 40,000 participants is not limited. https://t.co/YMj1nCguoy
@grok @ortis78 החיסון לקורונה אינו מונע הדבקה. מקורות: 1. ריאיון - פרופ' גליה רהב https://t.co/Pue0tSW4Tk. 2. דשבורד משרד הבריאות https://t.co/1J4BJpPMra.... 3. Safety and Efficacy of the BNT162b2 mRNA Covid-19 Vaccine https://t.co/k0mZCTlEYR.
@Rod__Mason @DPJHodges He's been under investigation by the GMC and does seem to be on a grift https://t.co/ovqIQ69HM2
RT @suzuki_takaya: 1回接種の効果自体はファイザーの最初の論部でも明らかです。1回接種後にすでにカーブが曲がり始めている。わざわざ拡大しています。4/ https://t.co/oe6RQF2jt9 https://t.co/vIoPN7dgDV
RT @Svedjebruket: Kommer du ihåg rekommendationerna för gravida under den påhittade pandemin? Känner du också till att inga gravida kvinno…
@BrownsTribe24 @SaiKate108 https://t.co/7B6S4eENIi https://t.co/GcUQs9iea2
@GODISGREAT824 @SarahLarchmont https://t.co/EgzGw0OjOi
@CheriWh35447182 @crazypilljones @kwvidrine @SarahLarchmont They did say so, you’re just not that bright It was similar in safety to other vaccines https://t.co/EgzGw0OjOi
@AldaMetaX @kwvidrine @SarahLarchmont It’s right here you clown https://t.co/EgzGw0OjOi
RT @Svedjebruket: Kommer du ihåg rekommendationerna för gravida under den påhittade pandemin? Känner du också till att inga gravida kvinno…
Kommer du ihåg rekommendationerna för gravida under den påhittade pandemin? Känner du också till att inga gravida kvinnor deltog i Pfizers "säkerhetsstudie" som 85% av svenska folket injicerade? https://t.co/GHynYe4ZO1 https://t.co/JSbqM2ou6O https://t.co/fWfALJGlNU
@TeresaRegatta @Bubblebathgirl @atrupar https://t.co/TehmalNGct
@NateWeymouth @KLVeritas @BillGates There are many similar studies, you know, actual scientific studies... https://t.co/6rJdwBNEl0
@ultrawave5 @theHFDF @SenRonJohnson All of the approved #COVIDVACCINE have been through Phase I, II and III human clinical trails. #Pfizer Phase III clinical trial data were published in Dec 2020, 95% efficacy against original #COVID19 compared to placebo vaccinated controls, good safety https://t.co/iqxV4fpZ6Z
@IrnBoru @SarahLarchmont @_d3f4ult You are conveniently forgetting that thousands were dying every day at the height of Covid. Please read this: Safety and Efficacy of the BNT162b2 mRNA Covid-19 Vaccine | New England Journal of Medicine https://t.co/17TwP1FoIF
@red_dread1515 @tristanlomas @sarahkahncept @AltWorldChuddie @mrsballs69 please educate yourself, chuck this into chatgpt if you need help understanding it, this is just ONE paper on covid vaccine efficacy but you can find more if you take the time to research: https://t.co/4G7grRJcxu
1回接種の効果自体はファイザーの最初の論部でも明らかです。1回接種後にすでにカーブが曲がり始めている。わざわざ拡大しています。4/ https://t.co/oe6RQF2jt9 https://t.co/vIoPN7dgDV
RT @SocialImpurity: Don't believe me? See for yourself. https://t.co/w19R6O9z1j https://t.co/Xlir1Sf6dL
@StephnEstes @kevinnbass https://t.co/4kv4TM4Jb1. You are 100% wrong. The clinical trials tested two things: 1) safety and 2) efficacy against catching covid. You would really ill informed
@FishInBubb @SarahLarchmont https://t.co/eMtDiTZG0L
@LDunlap39893042 @ATenaciousDad @scottiev @joma_gc https://t.co/5RiFGJn27A
@LDunlap39893042 @ATenaciousDad @scottiev @joma_gc I just responded. The NEJM is bunk. It’s called rejecting the premise my brother/sister. https://t.co/5RiFGJn27A
@blackmonforever https://t.co/E1UFbcg2bX
@ShalomOnKaspa @FliesLordofthe @DrEricDing Opposite - why don't you take a look yourself? You can read, correct? https://t.co/S2miJhFGfu
@ShalomOnKaspa @FliesLordofthe @DrEricDing Why don't you look at the results yourself, Einstein? https://t.co/S2miJhFGfu
@ludwigbpm @VezoVezir @JackProphete C'était caché dans les suppléments de l'étude du NEJM. https://t.co/Kc7QCSVxZG
@helgy2 @mike_lucullus @arthur_eckart @buckingfankers @David11359148 @jbhearn @AngryFleas @Davidmetroland @in_my_hands32 @TIMGOLDFINCH @ThomasSirianni2 @PerKurowski @bourdeau_ed @HenricCont @Ellis_Greenwood @Bemused21 @PaulAllcho33149 @Pinkcasso13 @NaomiLWood @takeitwithsalt @Jonatha2011Luis @StewartButton @KevinTartis @MikeTho04795078 @KimDriver11 @sioneill @ParkersPlaster1 @MarkJCarney @YouTube @sashayanshin @reformparty_uk @lawyers4britain @pulte The trials in the US are not hidden. Over 43,000 people were tested on Pfizer’s jab alone. https://t.co/U47qVAdoGO
@jsmith4966 @SecKennedy What’s bought off here? Explain how the reviewer experts of this published trial were bought off. Otherwise, call your lawyer There’s a liable suit potentially being filed https://t.co/Xazq9y4QUv
@ennui365 Yes, let's. https://t.co/MVY9wtTj5P https://t.co/o7LKtU1I3f https://t.co/7nZIqTih9T
@Brcremer Never once read a scientific study while pretending to be an intellectual and locking yourself into an echo chamber is, quite literally, Cult 101. https://t.co/o7LKtU1I3f https://t.co/MVY9wtTj5P https://t.co/7nZIqTih9T
@ManuelHillebran @dschmid_ch @mcpolitik Doch gibt es quelle und studie : https://t.co/h6dtA6Bg4M https://t.co/X6CNGRYJ9a https://t.co/rdh8kiwaMh
RT @Evolion23151: @kwvidrine @SarahLarchmont 1. There is not just “THE” vaccine, there are multiple 2. You can find clinical trials if you…
@DavidSCase101 @PorterFrazier12 @SarahLarchmont This trial was done before the public rollout of the vaccine https://t.co/slpWNKokIF
@me__chan38 ワクチンの効果 https://t.co/38ic3nQs72 https://t.co/vdCfDkudgp https://t.co/vdCfDkudgp マスクの効果 https://t.co/Syl0s1CxFq https://t.co/MCIzauJdx4 新型コロナウイルスのゲノム https://t.co/PJVrwt906y 新型コロナウイルスの危険性 https://t.co/memSBbL74j これくらいでいいですか？
@crazycornishcr1 @RavuSpeaks @RapidResponse47 @SecKennedy @RonWyden Polack, F. P., et al. (2020). "Safety and Efficacy of the BNT162b2 mRNA Covid-19 Vaccine." New England Journal of Medicine, 383(27), 2603-2615. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa2034577.
@dlbeard @Renee_the_gram @cspan @RonWyden @SecKennedy @grok Polack, F. P., et al. (2020). "Safety and Efficacy of the BNT162b2 mRNA Covid-19 Vaccine." New England Journal of Medicine, 383(27), 2603-2615. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa2034577.
RT @JWPatarino: It is astonishing how someone in his position can blatantly lie: 1. The Pfizer clinical trials are public (https://t.co/7b…
@RepAndyBiggsAZ @SecKennedy To write (or say), “The Covid-19 vaccine was untested, unsafe, and ineffective” is to write a lie, to whit - Safety and Efficacy of the BNT162b2 mRNA Covid-19 Vaccine, published Dec 31, 2020 https://t.co/JoQE6m0TGB (Blue = cases of COVID-19 v time; red = vaccinated) https://t.co/gme4zmGGgc
@likitysplit50 @MAGAMANATX @TheChiefNerd 1. Polack FP, Thomas SJ, Kitchin N, et al. Safety and Efficacy of the BNT162b2 mRNA Covid-19 Vaccine. N Engl J Med 2020; 383:2603.
It is astonishing how someone in his position can blatantly lie: 1. The Pfizer clinical trials are public (https://t.co/7blNzu8tHL). "Serious" adverse events were rare & spread between vax & placebo groups. 2 in vax group & 4 in placebo died. None of those from Vax *or* Covid https://t.co/eYT5TxEoFN
@KayVonPaul @antonis_tsagari @trillionofcells @JED94397814 @cappsie @DopplerEffect93 @drloveariyana @Lorenzo7127 @djt10 @higgsri @SnowflakeJ7 @71832Afterparty @SKULjammer @RonMortimer3 @richykirsh @dirk_fasshauer @Mike6150817700 @NexusSwords @CarlSmytheCells @SAFC1973Mayenda @614Caravan46273 @crabb_vicki @Scary7Dr @ChrisJohnsonMD @TerryTerroriser @itisjustmebabe @BreezerGalway @NurseMicheleRN @davideyoungmd @richardyoungMN @BurgerLab12 @Earthdriver @mass_rising @BlairHealt68622 @PatrickSquirrel @SkepticalMutant @CaryDavid722 @exohalophiles @deerbrian @DemsRRacePimps @BlueLionBlog @FillmoreWhite @Alex_on_A14 @jtmayes3 @AndrewLazarus4 @ncdave4life @TMGFlorida @Roper_Lab @ktibus @SecedeFromFools Funny meme, if you like dark humor. I distrust Trump, so I waited for the RCT to be published before deciding if I would take the Trump-vax. This wasn’t the only thing I read… but have you read t
@KenDye13 @DrNeilStone The data has literally been there the whole time: https://t.co/IYK1bE5zMk https://t.co/orlraP1LM2
@phenn @MansurQr @RepMTG 1. Thomas SJ, Moreira ED Jr, Kitchin N, et al. Safety and Efficacy of the BNT162b2 mRNA Covid-19 Vaccine through 6 Months. N Engl J Med 2021; 385:1761.
@phenn @MansurQr @RepMTG 1. Polack FP, Thomas SJ, Kitchin N, et al. Safety and Efficacy of the BNT162b2 mRNA Covid-19 Vaccine. N Engl J Med 2020; 383:2603.
Safety and Efficacy of the BNT162b2 mRNA Covid-19 Vaccine | New England Journal of Medicine https://t.co/1tHuWSZ6ce
@tGltltFQB0Jis9P Polack FP, Thomas SJ, Kitchin N, et al. Safety and efficacy of the BNT162b2 mRNA Covid-19 vaccine. N Engl J Med. 2020;383(27):2603-2615. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa2034577.
Efficacy of BNT162b2 vaccine against COVID-19 after the first dose, from "Safety and Efficacy of the BNT162b2 mRNA Covid-19 Vaccine" published in the The New England Journal of Medicine (nejm.org/doi/full/10....), and the xkcd comic inspired by it (xkcd.com/2400/).
Efficacy of BNT162b2 vaccine against COVID-19 after the first dose, from "Safety and Efficacy of the BNT162b2 mRNA Covid-19 Vaccine" published in the The New England Journal of Medicine (https://t.co/nRWNddozIo), and the xkcd comic inspired by it (https://t.co/jNGYzKg72U). https://t.co/o25XpaAAa1 https://t.co/NMqsf3wUYp
@StevenMBelknap @TheUltimateSean @ScottAdamsSays The study clearly states it was randomized, observer blind, placebo controlled. The citation: Polack, Fernando P et al. “Safety and Efficacy of the BNT162b2 mRNA Covid-19 Vaccine.” The New England journal of medicine vol. 383,27 (2020): 2603-2615. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa2034577
@TrumpDailyPosts What is he talking about? The studies are public. What am I missing? https://t.co/aTITDlTqRj
Safety and Efficacy of the BNT162b2 mRNA Covid-19 Vaccine | New England Journal of Medicine https://t.co/XkidKR4zqB https://t.co/G2i8351sfw https://t.co/pYp8Prel36
@Danielthmanyall @25_cycle @simonmaechling Both Pfizer-BioNTech and Moderna vaccines had large Phase I–III trials with tens of thousands of participants, evaluated for safety, immunogenicity, and efficacy. Ref: Polack FP et al., NEJM 2020 — “Safety and Efficacy of the BNT162b2 mRNA COVID-19 Vaccine” —
@TruthAnswersAll @dr_demetre COVID vaccine safe and effective https://t.co/OgttQdXCTZ
@SteigstraHerman @PolderPaleo Safety and Efficacy of the BNT162b2 mRNA Covid-19 Vaccine, ik vond voorgaande studie via https://t.co/ByvMrbP8Z2. Ik hoop dat je daarmee iets kunt.
@atom_fireball @kevinfolta @adamcarolla Your belief isn't a randomized, placebo-controlled trial. https://t.co/WxLjiExOtv https://t.co/hxfvdy5sKt
@NeutralExtreme @kevinfolta @adamcarolla cope harder https://t.co/WxLjiExgDX https://t.co/NsobTVTZKV
@market_memetics @Lorenzo7127 @KayVonPaul @cappsie @SnowflakeJ7 @71832Afterparty @SKULjammer @higgsri @RonMortimer3 @richykirsh @dirk_fasshauer @Mike6150817700 @NexusSwords @CarlSmytheCells @SAFC1973Mayenda @614Caravan46273 @crabb_vicki @Scary7Dr @ChrisJohnsonMD @TerryTerroriser @itisjustmebabe @BreezerGalway @drloveariyana @NurseMicheleRN @davideyoungmd @richardyoungMN @trillionofcells @BurgerLab12 @Earthdriver @mass_rising @BlairHealt68622 @djt10 @DopplerEffect93 @PatrickSquirrel @SkepticalMutant @CaryDavid722 @exohalophiles @deerbrian @DemsRRacePimps @BlueLionBlog @FillmoreWhite @Alex_on_A14 @jtmayes3 @AndrewLazarus4 @ncdave4life @TMGFlorida @Roper_Lab @ktibus @SecedeFromFools Autopsy study for safety signals? How long were we supposed to wait? The RCT with 43k participants (22k in an aline Placebo control group) was good enough for me to decide I would take the
@dalseno_andrea @DelMax64 Uno a caso https://t.co/DjoC88gDyV
@BigCFinancial @McCulloughFund @P_McCulloughMD @NicHulscher What’s this then champ? https://t.co/B99s7hkA14
@french_walking @Elysee Les vaccins ARNm sont les plus sûrs jamais produits. Macron a doublé le budget de La Défense depuis 2017. https://t.co/OgttQdYaJx
@m_t_patton @DrCatharineY Please explain these alleged ‘failures’. https://t.co/OgttQdXCTZ
@RootyRootbrian @MatersTightHole @Waltika @DrNeilStone Actually it's the Pfizer trial -interesting that COVIDian morons didn't recognise it? Did you inject yourself for some free fries
@Vrifiera1819301 @barriere_dr En décembre 2020. https://t.co/OgttQdXCTZ
35/ 2. Polack FP, Thomas SJ, Kitchin N, Absalon J, Gurtman A, Lockhart S, et al. Safety and Efficacy of BNT162b2 mRNA Covid-19 Vaccine. N Engl J Med 2020;383:2603–15. https://t.co/JlGVaQ4Fti.
RT @ChanceGardiner: Le più grandi FRODI scientifiche nella Storia - Frodi sull'origine del virus: 1. https://t.co/tEXV684NSt 2. https:/…
RT @ChanceGardiner: Le più grandi FRODI scientifiche nella Storia - Frodi sull'origine del virus: 1. https://t.co/tEXV684NSt 2. https:/…
RT @manuelpourtois: @BeaupinEric 44000 personnes enrôlées dans les tests. Benêt. https://t.co/OgttQdXCTZ
RT @ChanceGardiner: Le più grandi FRODI scientifiche nella Storia - Frodi sull'origine del virus: 1. https://t.co/tEXV684NSt 2. https:/…
RT @ChanceGardiner: Le più grandi FRODI scientifiche nella Storia - Frodi sull'origine del virus: 1. https://t.co/tEXV684NSt 2. https:/…
RT @ChanceGardiner: Le più grandi FRODI scientifiche nella Storia - Frodi sull'origine del virus: 1. https://t.co/tEXV684NSt 2. https:/…
RT @ChanceGardiner: Le più grandi FRODI scientifiche nella Storia - Frodi sull'origine del virus: 1. https://t.co/tEXV684NSt 2. https:/…
RT @ChanceGardiner: Le più grandi FRODI scientifiche nella Storia - Frodi sull'origine del virus: 1. https://t.co/tEXV684NSt 2. https:/…
RT @ChanceGardiner: Le più grandi FRODI scientifiche nella Storia - Frodi sull'origine del virus: 1. https://t.co/tEXV684NSt 2. https:/…
RT @ChanceGardiner: Le più grandi FRODI scientifiche nella Storia - Frodi sull'origine del virus: 1. https://t.co/tEXV684NSt 2. https:/…
RT @ChanceGardiner: Le più grandi FRODI scientifiche nella Storia - Frodi sull'origine del virus: 1. https://t.co/tEXV684NSt 2. https:/…
RT @ChanceGardiner: Le più grandi FRODI scientifiche nella Storia - Frodi sull'origine del virus: 1. https://t.co/tEXV684NSt 2. https:/…
Despite his flawed predictions based on the Santa Clara serological survey that COVID would disappear in early 2020, actual breakthroughs were published in Dec 2020 in the NEJM as a gateway to the large-scale distribution of life-saving, mRNA vaccines. www.nejm.org/doi/full/10....
RT @ChanceGardiner: Le più grandi FRODI scientifiche nella Storia - Frodi sull'origine del virus: 1. https://t.co/tEXV684NSt 2. https:/…
RT @ChanceGardiner: Le più grandi FRODI scientifiche nella Storia - Frodi sull'origine del virus: 1. https://t.co/tEXV684NSt 2. https:/…
RT @ChanceGardiner: Le più grandi FRODI scientifiche nella Storia - Frodi sull'origine del virus: 1. https://t.co/tEXV684NSt 2. https:/…
RT @ChanceGardiner: Le più grandi FRODI scientifiche nella Storia - Frodi sull'origine del virus: 1. https://t.co/tEXV684NSt 2. https:/…
RT @ChanceGardiner: Le più grandi FRODI scientifiche nella Storia - Frodi sull'origine del virus: 1. https://t.co/tEXV684NSt 2. https:/…
RT @ChanceGardiner: Le più grandi FRODI scientifiche nella Storia - Frodi sull'origine del virus: 1. https://t.co/tEXV684NSt 2. https:/…
RT @ChanceGardiner: Le più grandi FRODI scientifiche nella Storia - Frodi sull'origine del virus: 1. https://t.co/tEXV684NSt 2. https:/…
RT @ChanceGardiner: Le più grandi FRODI scientifiche nella Storia - Frodi sull'origine del virus: 1. https://t.co/tEXV684NSt 2. https:/…
RT @ChanceGardiner: Le più grandi FRODI scientifiche nella Storia - Frodi sull'origine del virus: 1. https://t.co/tEXV684NSt 2. https:/…
RT @ChanceGardiner: Le più grandi FRODI scientifiche nella Storia - Frodi sull'origine del virus: 1. https://t.co/tEXV684NSt 2. https:/…
RT @ChanceGardiner: Le più grandi FRODI scientifiche nella Storia - Frodi sull'origine del virus: 1. https://t.co/tEXV684NSt 2. https:/…
RT @ChanceGardiner: Le più grandi FRODI scientifiche nella Storia - Frodi sull'origine del virus: 1. https://t.co/tEXV684NSt 2. https:/…
RT @ChanceGardiner: Le più grandi FRODI scientifiche nella Storia - Frodi sull'origine del virus: 1. https://t.co/tEXV684NSt 2. https:/…
RT @ChanceGardiner: Le più grandi FRODI scientifiche nella Storia - Frodi sull'origine del virus: 1. https://t.co/tEXV684NSt 2. https:/…
RT @ChanceGardiner: Le più grandi FRODI scientifiche nella Storia - Frodi sull'origine del virus: 1. https://t.co/tEXV684NSt 2. https:/…
RT @ChanceGardiner: Le più grandi FRODI scientifiche nella Storia - Frodi sull'origine del virus: 1. https://t.co/tEXV684NSt 2. https:/…
RT @ChanceGardiner: Le più grandi FRODI scientifiche nella Storia - Frodi sull'origine del virus: 1. https://t.co/tEXV684NSt 2. https:/…
RT @ChanceGardiner: Le più grandi FRODI scientifiche nella Storia - Frodi sull'origine del virus: 1. https://t.co/tEXV684NSt 2. https:/…
RT @ChanceGardiner: Le più grandi FRODI scientifiche nella Storia - Frodi sull'origine del virus: 1. https://t.co/tEXV684NSt 2. https:/…
RT @ChanceGardiner: Le più grandi FRODI scientifiche nella Storia - Frodi sull'origine del virus: 1. https://t.co/tEXV684NSt 2. https:/…
RT @ChanceGardiner: Le più grandi FRODI scientifiche nella Storia - Frodi sull'origine del virus: 1. https://t.co/tEXV684NSt 2. https:/…
RT @ChanceGardiner: Le più grandi FRODI scientifiche nella Storia - Frodi sull'origine del virus: 1. https://t.co/tEXV684NSt 2. https:/…
RT @ChanceGardiner: Le più grandi FRODI scientifiche nella Storia - Frodi sull'origine del virus: 1. https://t.co/tEXV684NSt 2. https:/…
RT @ChanceGardiner: Le più grandi FRODI scientifiche nella Storia - Frodi sull'origine del virus: 1. https://t.co/tEXV684NSt 2. https:/…
RT @ChanceGardiner: Le più grandi FRODI scientifiche nella Storia - Frodi sull'origine del virus: 1. https://t.co/tEXV684NSt 2. https:/…
RT @ChanceGardiner: Le più grandi FRODI scientifiche nella Storia - Frodi sull'origine del virus: 1. https://t.co/tEXV684NSt 2. https:/…
RT @ChanceGardiner: Le più grandi FRODI scientifiche nella Storia - Frodi sull'origine del virus: 1. https://t.co/tEXV684NSt 2. https:/…
RT @ChanceGardiner: Le più grandi FRODI scientifiche nella Storia - Frodi sull'origine del virus: 1. https://t.co/tEXV684NSt 2. https:/…
RT @ChanceGardiner: Le più grandi FRODI scientifiche nella Storia - Frodi sull'origine del virus: 1. https://t.co/tEXV684NSt 2. https:/…
RT @ChanceGardiner: Le più grandi FRODI scientifiche nella Storia - Frodi sull'origine del virus: 1. https://t.co/tEXV684NSt 2. https:/…
RT @ChanceGardiner: Le più grandi FRODI scientifiche nella Storia - Frodi sull'origine del virus: 1. https://t.co/tEXV684NSt 2. https:/…
RT @ChanceGardiner: Le più grandi FRODI scientifiche nella Storia - Frodi sull'origine del virus: 1. https://t.co/tEXV684NSt 2. https:/…
RT @ChanceGardiner: Le più grandi FRODI scientifiche nella Storia - Frodi sull'origine del virus: 1. https://t.co/tEXV684NSt 2. https:/…
RT @ChanceGardiner: Le più grandi FRODI scientifiche nella Storia - Frodi sull'origine del virus: 1. https://t.co/tEXV684NSt 2. https:/…
RT @ChanceGardiner: Le più grandi FRODI scientifiche nella Storia - Frodi sull'origine del virus: 1. https://t.co/tEXV684NSt 2. https:/…
RT @ChanceGardiner: Le più grandi FRODI scientifiche nella Storia - Frodi sull'origine del virus: 1. https://t.co/tEXV684NSt 2. https:/…
RT @ChanceGardiner: Le più grandi FRODI scientifiche nella Storia - Frodi sull'origine del virus: 1. https://t.co/tEXV684NSt 2. https:/…
RT @ChanceGardiner: Le più grandi FRODI scientifiche nella Storia - Frodi sull'origine del virus: 1. https://t.co/tEXV684NSt 2. https:/…
RT @ChanceGardiner: Le più grandi FRODI scientifiche nella Storia - Frodi sull'origine del virus: 1. https://t.co/tEXV684NSt 2. https:/…
RT @ChanceGardiner: Le più grandi FRODI scientifiche nella Storia - Frodi sull'origine del virus: 1. https://t.co/tEXV684NSt 2. https:/…
RT @ChanceGardiner: Le più grandi FRODI scientifiche nella Storia - Frodi sull'origine del virus: 1. https://t.co/tEXV684NSt 2. https:/…
RT @ChanceGardiner: Le più grandi FRODI scientifiche nella Storia - Frodi sull'origine del virus: 1. https://t.co/tEXV684NSt 2. https:/…
RT @ChanceGardiner: Le più grandi FRODI scientifiche nella Storia - Frodi sull'origine del virus: 1. https://t.co/tEXV684NSt 2. https:/…
RT @ChanceGardiner: Le più grandi FRODI scientifiche nella Storia - Frodi sull'origine del virus: 1. https://t.co/tEXV684NSt 2. https:/…
RT @ChanceGardiner: Le più grandi FRODI scientifiche nella Storia - Frodi sull'origine del virus: 1. https://t.co/tEXV684NSt 2. https:/…
RT @ChanceGardiner: Le più grandi FRODI scientifiche nella Storia - Frodi sull'origine del virus: 1. https://t.co/tEXV684NSt 2. https:/…
RT @ChanceGardiner: Le più grandi FRODI scientifiche nella Storia - Frodi sull'origine del virus: 1. https://t.co/tEXV684NSt 2. https:/…
Le più grandi FRODI scientifiche nella Storia - Frodi sull'origine del virus: 1. https://t.co/tEXV684NSt 2. https://t.co/uZFj4imrss 3. https://t.co/Q1lONnzhmk - Frode di Pfizer: https://t.co/aMaHQ2xwsj - Frode sull'Idrossiclorochina: https://t.co/KY2szT2ntc https://t.co/oz0RKhFjFF
@marco_borrano @mar40248589 @barbarab1974 https://t.co/Zcpx66cNfa
Safety and Efficacy of the BNT162b2 mRNA Covid-19 Vaccine through 6 Months BNT162b2 mRNA COVID-19ワクチンの6ヶ月間の安全性と有効性 pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC...
@BeaupinEric 44000 personnes enrôlées dans les tests. Benêt. https://t.co/OgttQdXCTZ
@Asteroid_Now @BradBanko @jeffreyatucker Safety and Efficacy of the BNT162b2 mRNA Covid-19 Vaccine, NEJM, December 10, 2020. The article will claim safe, but the AC-SAE data (127 vs. 116) shows this was not proven. Furthermore, the AC-SAE data shows a red flag. Which the authors and FDA ignored (no surprise).
46. 21. General Vaccine Safety, Effectiveness & Platforms Polack, F.P. et al. (2020). Safety and efficacy of the BNT162b2 mRNA COVID-19 vaccine. New England Journal of Medicine. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa2034577 (PubMed)
@EmmanuelDu36347 @Cdanslair @nicolasberrod Mais des études pour prouver la sécurité des vaccins : https://t.co/OgttQdXCTZ
@LaineRodolphe @Cdanslair @nicolasberrod Vaccin BioNTech/Pfizer : étude sur 44000 personnes. https://t.co/OgttQdXCTZ
@CannonofBannon @BreezerGalway @Alex_on_A14 @jneill @CowboySkater @TakethatCt @myhiddenvalue The titles of the papers are different + state the different vaccines they are about. You lied about them being on the same vaccine to avoid addressing their contents. "Safety and Efficacy of the BNT162b2 mRNA Covid-19 Vaccine" https://t.co/gFcGqlqC05 https://t.co/b87PfMezFT https://t.co/75lLA7A1o2
@RyuichiYoneyama BioNTech およびPfizerの支援を受けています。 BNT162b2 mRNA COVID-19ワクチンの6ヶ月間の安全性と有効性 2021年9月15日公開 Safety and Efficacy of the BNT162b2 mRNA Covid-19 Vaccine through 6 Months | New England Journal of Medicine https://t.co/0MXTq2JtdK https://t.co/84k0hGkj9G https://t.co/YTWm30nCCG
RT @haitatsuingoro: @fcOpaleye @yuya1209369 > …全くエビデンスが… 新型コロナウイルス（SARS-CoV-2）のワクチンの有効性を示す論文を１１どうぞ。さぁ、反証してください。 その１： Polack, F. P., et al.…
RT @haitatsuingoro: @fcOpaleye @yuya1209369 > …全くエビデンスが… 新型コロナウイルス（SARS-CoV-2）のワクチンの有効性を示す論文を１１どうぞ。さぁ、反証してください。 その１： Polack, F. P., et al.…
@MyCup0verFlows @DrNeilStone 1. Thomas SJ, Moreira ED Jr, Kitchin N, et al. Safety and Efficacy of the BNT162b2 mRNA Covid-19 Vaccine through 6 Months. N Engl J Med 2021; 385:1761.
@MyCup0verFlows @DrNeilStone 1. Polack FP, Thomas SJ, Kitchin N, et al. Safety and Efficacy of the BNT162b2 mRNA Covid-19 Vaccine. N Engl J Med 2020; 383:2603.
@fcOpaleye @yuya1209369 > …全くエビデンスが… 新型コロナウイルス（SARS-CoV-2）のワクチンの有効性を示す論文を１１どうぞ。さぁ、反証してください。 その１： Polack, F. P., et al. (2020). "Safety and Efficacy of the BNT162b2 mRNA Covid-19 Vaccine." New England Journal of Medicine, 383(27), 2603-2615.
@jantjaeckx @bartdrenth @HoebekePiet wetenschappers, virologen, biologen, etc. Kijk eens naar ECHT onderzoek ipv outlier studies die uw confirmation bias bevestigen. https://t.co/9y3HT3Lg9i
@ExistentialEnso he's absolutely wrong Key Sources: WHO on mRNA vaccine safety CDC mRNA Vaccine Safety Data NEJM: “Safety and Efficacy of the BNT162b2 mRNA Covid‑19 Vaccine”
@NaftanCNMI @simonmaechling 1. Polack FP, Thomas SJ, Kitchin N, et al. Safety and Efficacy of the BNT162b2 mRNA Covid-19 Vaccine. N Engl J Med 2020; 383:2603.
@shawood1969 @simonmaechling mRNA vaccines (Pfizer & Moderna) were tested in placebo-controlled RCTs with over 70,000 participants combined. Results: ✅ >90% efficacy in preventing COVID-19 ✅ Strong safety profile
@SueBee545513460 @EthonRaptor @EternalBuddha3 @DrNeilStone Here’s the RCT, published in NEJM, Dec 31, 2020. It’s pretty specific and had a sample 43,000 adult participants. https://t.co/1GWXZW9poC
@JulietteMiss46 @grisou97160 L’article EST l’étude (si tu veux contester l’étude, essaye, mais des centaines de neuneus ont déjà essayé ) https://t.co/c5raOQ1TC2
@JulietteMiss46 @grisou97160 Que racontes tu encore comme bêtises ? Tu t’écoutes affabuler. Consulte. Kariko (BioNTech et prix Nobel de médecine 2023 pour ces vaccins) publiait dés 2006 sur les vaccins ARNm. https://t.co/c5raOQ1TC2
@Rik12305402 @FILIPVERTRIEST @SteviesQuotes @vanranstmarc https://t.co/BDMSUe0byy
@djt10 @cappsie @JamesPa24472406 @richykirsh @higgsri @Scary7Dr @WaitingForPerot @DopplerEffect93 @crabb_vicki @mass_rising @jojo_rn123 @NeverV82625 @drloveariyana @NurseMicheleRN @ChrisJohnsonMD @davideyoungmd @richardyoungMN @trillionofcells @BurgerLab12 @Earthdriver @BlairHealt68622 @PatrickSquirrel @CarlSmytheCells @SkepticalMutant @CaryDavid722 @exohalophiles @Lorenzo7127 @deerbrian @DemsRRacePimps @BlueLionBlog @FillmoreWhite @Alex_on_A14 @jtmayes3 @AndrewLazarus4 @ncdave4life @TMGFlorida @Roper_Lab @ktibus @SecedeFromFools @TorySnyc @dirk_fasshauer @RonMortimer3 @lasikeyecenter1 @Hanky1844607 @Awithonelison @NoGlobalist778 @EugeneBu @AcampbelTeacher @EdwardDS15 @VickiCoyle10019 Good Goddess you keep forgetting or ignoring that c19 mRNA vaccine WAS TESTED AGAINST SALINE PLACEBO IN the RCT of 43,000 adults. Polack et al December 31, 2020, NEJM. https://t.co/1GWXZW9poC
@Madden9007 @grreymage @DrNeilStone @MakisMD 1. Thomas SJ, Moreira ED Jr, Kitchin N, et al. Safety and Efficacy of the BNT162b2 mRNA Covid-19 Vaccine through 6 Months. N Engl J Med 2021; 385:1761.
@Madden9007 @grreymage @DrNeilStone @MakisMD 1. Polack FP, Thomas SJ, Kitchin N, et al. Safety and Efficacy of the BNT162b2 mRNA Covid-19 Vaccine. N Engl J Med 2020; 383:2603.
RT @iXeno: @cappsie @djt10 @JamesPa24472406 @richykirsh @higgsri @Scary7Dr @WaitingForPerot @DopplerEffect93 @crabb_vicki @mass_rising @joj…
@cappsie @djt10 @JamesPa24472406 @richykirsh @higgsri @Scary7Dr @WaitingForPerot @DopplerEffect93 @crabb_vicki @mass_rising @jojo_rn123 @NeverV82625 @drloveariyana @NurseMicheleRN @ChrisJohnsonMD @davideyoungmd @richardyoungMN @trillionofcells @BurgerLab12 @Earthdriver @BlairHealt68622 @PatrickSquirrel @CarlSmytheCells @SkepticalMutant @CaryDavid722 @exohalophiles @Lorenzo7127 @deerbrian @DemsRRacePimps @BlueLionBlog @FillmoreWhite @Alex_on_A14 @jtmayes3 @AndrewLazarus4 @ncdave4life @TMGFlorida @Roper_Lab @ktibus @SecedeFromFools @TorySnyc @dirk_fasshauer @RonMortimer3 @lasikeyecenter1 @Hanky1844607 @Awithonelison @NoGlobalist778 @EugeneBu @AcampbelTeacher @EdwardDS15 @VickiCoyle10019 I always keep a tab open to the Polack et al 2020 RCT in NEJM with 43,000 participants randomly assigned to active mRNA or saline Placebo condition. https://t.co/1GWXZW9poC
@SecKennedy Phase 2/3 trials (C4591001) where 20.3% of participants reported one or more underlying diseases. "Safety and Efficacy of the BNT162b2 mRNA Covid-19 Vaccine" published on Dec. 31, 2020. This means the remaining 79.7% were healthy and not immuno-compromised.
@statonomic @MauricioDonofr1 @DrNeilStone Pay attention. You need a link to the original Pfizer trial? There are thousands of documents available. Here’s the first published phase 2/3 paper. https://t.co/9lY5HQmFEp
Subsequent rat studies that showed Comirnaty was safe for rats, too, proves that Safety and Efficacy of the BNT162b2 mRNA Covid-19 Vaccine wasn't a phase 3 trial and wasn't complete. Somehow.
He's still insisting that Safety and Efficacy of the BNT162b2 mRNA Covid-19 Vaccine, with 43,548 participants, which was what the vaccine's approval was based on in 149 countries, wasn't a Phase 3 trial.
@RoivainenJukka @TerveysMarika
@NeverV82625 @BurgerLab12 @RedForest580484 @dirk_fasshauer @71832Afterparty @SKULjammer @cappsie @BreezerGalway @Scary7Dr @drloveariyana @crabb_vicki @NurseMicheleRN @ChrisJohnsonMD @higgsri @davideyoungmd @richykirsh @richardyoungMN @trillionofcells @Earthdriver @mass_rising @BlairHealt68622 @djt10 @DopplerEffect93 @PatrickSquirrel @CarlSmytheCells @SkepticalMutant @CaryDavid722 @exohalophiles @Lorenzo7127 @deerbrian @DemsRRacePimps @BlueLionBlog @FillmoreWhite @Alex_on_A14 @jtmayes3 @AndrewLazarus4 @ncdave4life @TMGFlorida @Roper_Lab @ktibus @SecedeFromFools @TorySnyc @RonMortimer3 @lasikeyecenter1 @Hanky1844607 @Awithonelison @NoGlobalist778 @EugeneBu @AcampbelTeacher @EdwardDS15 I’m a research methodologist & began in 1984 with experimental design; here is the RCT, randomized clinical trial using double blind testing with saline placebo condition for control comparison. The expe
@HibernatingSG @RebelACole @ajlamesa @grok Debunked my ass & it does not matter what grok says - I have seen the documentation. It's 127 to 116 BTW. See for yourself - "Safety and Efficacy of the BNT162b2 mRNA Covid-19 Vaccine through 6 Months" (Supplementary Appendix)
@masterfocus @ivanildoiii Oh não, desculpa, você vai passar vergonha, o estudo teve acompanhamento contínuo e confirmou a eficácia: https://t.co/oHt6jzU2vH Na próxima pede pro GPT pesquisar se houve atualização antes de querer trazer conclusões que supostamente concordam com seus delírios.
@BreakingNewsFi2 @rmanzel843391 @sbABetterLeader Sure. Now you tell me why a vaccine with almost full protection against COVID and even greater protection against the worst symptoms isn't worth it when there's a .1% adverse reaction rate, the bulk of which are entirely treatable https://t.co/MakD2zT8Ea https://t.co/zvV1d8TlFb
@BreakingNewsFi2 @PlanBhoarder @sbABetterLeader Sure, if you think you're capable of understanding such a study, go ahead. And now you can link to any peer reviewed study that shows that a COVID vaccine is either unsafe or not effective, right? Right? Surely you're not spreading bullshit, are you? https://t.co/zvV1d8SNPD
@apronanarchy @simonmaechling Here’s some evidence showing they are tested for months, not “a few days” https://t.co/mAX2jRcpQT
@Felonaprision @anamvd2 @MVDNoticias Las vacunas estaban más que chequeadas. El problema sos vos y los como vos que en su pvπa vida leyeron un artículo científico. Mira el artículo, dónde fue publicado, la fecha, el "n", la metodología y los resultados https://t.co/T3YyzYeYkB
@grok @CHRN0B0G @dejanirasilveir Otra vez tu afirmación básada en 1modelo matemático, no en hechos. La propia Pfizer en sus resultados finales publicó la Eficacia real del -30% , sí, MENOS 30%.https://t.co/AYlKmSo8Cb Además no evaluaron seguridad (dicho en sus documentos-imagen-) https://t.co/FHVGqS6d0X https://t.co/E3dNSaZjBH
@LusulGorfou @MrfMrp @yannickneuder - RFK est une raclure comploplo sous cocaine. - voici ‘aucune étude’, benêt https://t.co/OgttQdXCTZ
@Gurhal1 @barriere_dr Pas en "double blind", juste "observer blinded" énorme biais ==> poubelle Safety and Efficacy of the BNT162b2 mRNA Covid-19 Vaccine | New England Journal of Medicine https://t.co/cBYrRbvcMJ Methods In an ongoing multinational, placebo-controlled, observer-blinded
@DLF_31 @silvano_trotta 1/3 Polack, F. P., et al. (2020). “Safety and Efficacy of the BNT162b2 mRNA Covid-19 Vaccine.” New England Journal of Medicine, 383(27), 2603–2615. DOI : 10.1056/NEJMoa2034577
@minamiyoro @goodluck1185 @alto502251 @PO1tClkrnTlznsi そして、治験内容が公開されましたよね。 https://t.co/iA7mRsJWiU
RT @kuwamitsuosamu: mRNAワクチンは「安全性データが出る前」に推奨されたわけではないのでは？ https://t.co/nURKSsx73L
RT @kuwamitsuosamu: mRNAワクチンは「安全性データが出る前」に推奨されたわけではないのでは？ https://t.co/nURKSsx73L
RT @kuwamitsuosamu: mRNAワクチンは「安全性データが出る前」に推奨されたわけではないのでは？ https://t.co/nURKSsx73L
mRNAワクチンは「安全性データが出る前」に推奨されたわけではないのでは？ https://t.co/nURKSsx73L https://t.co/Eyfug8JpT2
@VaccineMole @53v3n0fn1n3 @grok @TheLancet This study does not say vaccinated people died at higher rates. Early on, the vaccine was 95% effective at preventing symptomatic COVID 1 week after the first dose Safety and Efficacy of the BNT162b2 mRNA Covid-19 Vaccine https://t.co/4i2pzFDa3k
Addendum https://t.co/XBWdeBGkrZ
@Mister_Dancer @DrNeilStone https://t.co/GvNCySM0hM https://t.co/s8drtljlzJ https://t.co/uKcNFiYmy2 https://t.co/a6Rm2h1LPP https://t.co/lGU3kPUyOA https://t.co/GjuohVEMOf https://t.co/Hxae516DnP https://t.co/EgJoRzo1AH https://t.co/cYILLCCUBB
@detleflg @rivm Safety and Efficacy of the BNT162b2 mRNA Covid-19 Vaccine | New England Journal of Medicine
RT @LockedFab: Menteurs mettant en danger la santé publique pour obtenir des dons de pigeons... https://t.co/GTShkeAJBD https://t.co/BoGxF…
RT @LockedFab: Menteurs mettant en danger la santé publique pour obtenir des dons de pigeons... https://t.co/GTShkeAJBD https://t.co/BoGxF…
RT @LockedFab: Menteurs mettant en danger la santé publique pour obtenir des dons de pigeons... https://t.co/GTShkeAJBD https://t.co/BoGxF…
Menteurs mettant en danger la santé publique pour obtenir des dons de pigeons... https://t.co/GTShkeAJBD https://t.co/BoGxFkv8lb
RT @taka32193219: ああ、これは人から人への感染伝播の話ですね。ワクチン接種者は他人への感染伝播も抑制するのかどうかという検証はされてません。評価方法は接種後7日以降で、有症状＋“核酸増幅法で検査してSC2 陽 性 ”の割合で比較。つまり自分が被弾するリスクは減…
RT @taka32193219: ああ、これは人から人への感染伝播の話ですね。ワクチン接種者は他人への感染伝播も抑制するのかどうかという検証はされてません。評価方法は接種後7日以降で、有症状＋“核酸増幅法で検査してSC2 陽 性 ”の割合で比較。つまり自分が被弾するリスクは減…
RT @taka32193219: ああ、これは人から人への感染伝播の話ですね。ワクチン接種者は他人への感染伝播も抑制するのかどうかという検証はされてません。評価方法は接種後7日以降で、有症状＋“核酸増幅法で検査してSC2 陽 性 ”の割合で比較。つまり自分が被弾するリスクは減…
@rinset37984 https://t.co/eDApr4cOW2 どうぞ、第三相試験です。
RT @taka32193219: ああ、これは人から人への感染伝播の話ですね。ワクチン接種者は他人への感染伝播も抑制するのかどうかという検証はされてません。評価方法は接種後7日以降で、有症状＋“核酸増幅法で検査してSC2 陽 性 ”の割合で比較。つまり自分が被弾するリスクは減…
RT @taka32193219: ああ、これは人から人への感染伝播の話ですね。ワクチン接種者は他人への感染伝播も抑制するのかどうかという検証はされてません。評価方法は接種後7日以降で、有症状＋“核酸増幅法で検査してSC2 陽 性 ”の割合で比較。つまり自分が被弾するリスクは減…
RT @taka32193219: ああ、これは人から人への感染伝播の話ですね。ワクチン接種者は他人への感染伝播も抑制するのかどうかという検証はされてません。評価方法は接種後7日以降で、有症状＋“核酸増幅法で検査してSC2 陽 性 ”の割合で比較。つまり自分が被弾するリスクは減…
RT @taka32193219: ああ、これは人から人への感染伝播の話ですね。ワクチン接種者は他人への感染伝播も抑制するのかどうかという検証はされてません。評価方法は接種後7日以降で、有症状＋“核酸増幅法で検査してSC2 陽 性 ”の割合で比較。つまり自分が被弾するリスクは減…
ああ、これは人から人への感染伝播の話ですね。ワクチン接種者は他人への感染伝播も抑制するのかどうかという検証はされてません。評価方法は接種後7日以降で、有症状＋“核酸増幅法で検査してSC2 陽 性 ”の割合で比較。つまり自分が被弾するリスクは減るという結果です。 https://t.co/eDApr4cOW2 https://t.co/wz0pumlCfT
@roxslater @TheChiefNerd The peer-reviewed studies confirming placebo-controlled trials for mRNA vaccines are: 1. Pfizer-BioNTech: "Safety and Efficacy of the BNT162b2 mRNA Covid-19 Vaccine" (New England Journal of Medicine, Dec 9, 2020). 43,448 participants, half placebo, 95% efficacy. 2. Moderna:
@ShaunBMcGarry @outbreakupdates 1. Polack FP, Thomas SJ, Kitchin N, et al. Safety and Efficacy of the BNT162b2 mRNA Covid-19 Vaccine. N Engl J Med 2020; 383:2603.
RT @IntegralAnswers: 10/ References Ages 16–17 (Pfizer Phase 3 Trial)
10/ References Ages 16–17 (Pfizer Phase 3 Trial)
RT @takua_scientist: ＞なんで治験中なのに完全なデマだと言い切れるの？ ＞その時点でおかしいと気づくべきだったと思うよ。 ざっくりとした言葉に騙されないように。ざっと調べて時系列にまとめると… 2020年12月 市販のための治験結果公表（接種開始にあたっ…
RT @takua_scientist: ＞なんで治験中なのに完全なデマだと言い切れるの？ ＞その時点でおかしいと気づくべきだったと思うよ。 ざっくりとした言葉に騙されないように。ざっと調べて時系列にまとめると… 2020年12月 市販のための治験結果公表（接種開始にあたっ…
@IsmoBauer @Petri190722231 @ER_Korhola En minä ole foliohattu vaan edustan tieteen konsensusta
@elon_age @drramon14 @DaAcervo Sim https://t.co/MoBxUOvYJN. https://t.co/33sUNMGfNl
RT @takua_scientist: ＞なんで治験中なのに完全なデマだと言い切れるの？ ＞その時点でおかしいと気づくべきだったと思うよ。 ざっくりとした言葉に騙されないように。ざっと調べて時系列にまとめると… 2020年12月 市販のための治験結果公表（接種開始にあたっ…
RT @takua_scientist: ＞なんで治験中なのに完全なデマだと言い切れるの？ ＞その時点でおかしいと気づくべきだったと思うよ。 ざっくりとした言葉に騙されないように。ざっと調べて時系列にまとめると… 2020年12月 市販のための治験結果公表（接種開始にあたっ…
RT @takua_scientist: ＞なんで治験中なのに完全なデマだと言い切れるの？ ＞その時点でおかしいと気づくべきだったと思うよ。 ざっくりとした言葉に騙されないように。ざっと調べて時系列にまとめると… 2020年12月 市販のための治験結果公表（接種開始にあたっ…
RT @takua_scientist: ＞なんで治験中なのに完全なデマだと言い切れるの？ ＞その時点でおかしいと気づくべきだったと思うよ。 ざっくりとした言葉に騙されないように。ざっと調べて時系列にまとめると… 2020年12月 市販のための治験結果公表（接種開始にあたっ…
RT @takua_scientist: ＞なんで治験中なのに完全なデマだと言い切れるの？ ＞その時点でおかしいと気づくべきだったと思うよ。 ざっくりとした言葉に騙されないように。ざっと調べて時系列にまとめると… 2020年12月 市販のための治験結果公表（接種開始にあたっ…
RT @takua_scientist: ＞なんで治験中なのに完全なデマだと言い切れるの？ ＞その時点でおかしいと気づくべきだったと思うよ。 ざっくりとした言葉に騙されないように。ざっと調べて時系列にまとめると… 2020年12月 市販のための治験結果公表（接種開始にあたっ…
RT @takua_scientist: ＞なんで治験中なのに完全なデマだと言い切れるの？ ＞その時点でおかしいと気づくべきだったと思うよ。 ざっくりとした言葉に騙されないように。ざっと調べて時系列にまとめると… 2020年12月 市販のための治験結果公表（接種開始にあたっ…
RT @takua_scientist: ＞なんで治験中なのに完全なデマだと言い切れるの？ ＞その時点でおかしいと気づくべきだったと思うよ。 ざっくりとした言葉に騙されないように。ざっと調べて時系列にまとめると… 2020年12月 市販のための治験結果公表（接種開始にあたっ…
RT @takua_scientist: ＞なんで治験中なのに完全なデマだと言い切れるの？ ＞その時点でおかしいと気づくべきだったと思うよ。 ざっくりとした言葉に騙されないように。ざっと調べて時系列にまとめると… 2020年12月 市販のための治験結果公表（接種開始にあたっ…
RT @takua_scientist: ＞なんで治験中なのに完全なデマだと言い切れるの？ ＞その時点でおかしいと気づくべきだったと思うよ。 ざっくりとした言葉に騙されないように。ざっと調べて時系列にまとめると… 2020年12月 市販のための治験結果公表（接種開始にあたっ…
RT @takua_scientist: ＞なんで治験中なのに完全なデマだと言い切れるの？ ＞その時点でおかしいと気づくべきだったと思うよ。 ざっくりとした言葉に騙されないように。ざっと調べて時系列にまとめると… 2020年12月 市販のための治験結果公表（接種開始にあたっ…
RT @takua_scientist: ＞なんで治験中なのに完全なデマだと言い切れるの？ ＞その時点でおかしいと気づくべきだったと思うよ。 ざっくりとした言葉に騙されないように。ざっと調べて時系列にまとめると… 2020年12月 市販のための治験結果公表（接種開始にあたっ…
RT @takua_scientist: ＞なんで治験中なのに完全なデマだと言い切れるの？ ＞その時点でおかしいと気づくべきだったと思うよ。 ざっくりとした言葉に騙されないように。ざっと調べて時系列にまとめると… 2020年12月 市販のための治験結果公表（接種開始にあたっ…
RT @takua_scientist: ＞なんで治験中なのに完全なデマだと言い切れるの？ ＞その時点でおかしいと気づくべきだったと思うよ。 ざっくりとした言葉に騙されないように。ざっと調べて時系列にまとめると… 2020年12月 市販のための治験結果公表（接種開始にあたっ…
RT @takua_scientist: ＞なんで治験中なのに完全なデマだと言い切れるの？ ＞その時点でおかしいと気づくべきだったと思うよ。 ざっくりとした言葉に騙されないように。ざっと調べて時系列にまとめると… 2020年12月 市販のための治験結果公表（接種開始にあたっ…
RT @takua_scientist: ＞なんで治験中なのに完全なデマだと言い切れるの？ ＞その時点でおかしいと気づくべきだったと思うよ。 ざっくりとした言葉に騙されないように。ざっと調べて時系列にまとめると… 2020年12月 市販のための治験結果公表（接種開始にあたっ…
RT @takua_scientist: ＞なんで治験中なのに完全なデマだと言い切れるの？ ＞その時点でおかしいと気づくべきだったと思うよ。 ざっくりとした言葉に騙されないように。ざっと調べて時系列にまとめると… 2020年12月 市販のための治験結果公表（接種開始にあたっ…
RT @takua_scientist: ＞なんで治験中なのに完全なデマだと言い切れるの？ ＞その時点でおかしいと気づくべきだったと思うよ。 ざっくりとした言葉に騙されないように。ざっと調べて時系列にまとめると… 2020年12月 市販のための治験結果公表（接種開始にあたっ…
RT @takua_scientist: ＞なんで治験中なのに完全なデマだと言い切れるの？ ＞その時点でおかしいと気づくべきだったと思うよ。 ざっくりとした言葉に騙されないように。ざっと調べて時系列にまとめると… 2020年12月 市販のための治験結果公表（接種開始にあたっ…
@BlairHealt68622 @BCGreenSteve @SaiKate108 Which was tested in placebo controlled trials https://t.co/YMj1nCguoy Safety and Efficacy of the BNT162b2 mRNA Covid-19 Vaccine | New England Journal of Medicine
@BlairHealt68622 @BCGreenSteve @SaiKate108 The COVID vaccine was https://t.co/YMj1nCguoy Safety and Efficacy of the BNT162b2 mRNA Covid-19 Vaccine | New England Journal of Medicine
@BlairHealt68622 @BCGreenSteve @SaiKate108 They absolutely did the correct trials. https://t.co/YMj1nCguoy Safety and Efficacy of the BNT162b2 mRNA Covid-19 Vaccine | New England Journal of Medicine
@reverett1234 @trackingdonald @SecKennedy @CDCgov 1. Thomas SJ, Moreira ED Jr, Kitchin N, et al. Safety and Efficacy of the BNT162b2 mRNA Covid-19 Vaccine through 6 Months. N Engl J Med 2021; 385:1761.
@reverett1234 @trackingdonald @SecKennedy @CDCgov 1. Polack FP, Thomas SJ, Kitchin N, et al. Safety and Efficacy of the BNT162b2 mRNA Covid-19 Vaccine. N Engl J Med 2020; 383:2603.
@Nachomomma1221 @NewsHour https://t.co/5jkYoc1UrX Take this for example
@WePaisleyCircus @DrNeilStone 1. Thomas SJ, Moreira ED Jr, Kitchin N, et al. Safety and Efficacy of the BNT162b2 mRNA Covid-19 Vaccine through 6 Months. N Engl J Med 2021; 385:1761.
@WePaisleyCircus @DrNeilStone You are a fucking idiot of the highest order. 1. Polack FP, Thomas SJ, Kitchin N, et al. Safety and Efficacy of the BNT162b2 mRNA Covid-19 Vaccine. N Engl J Med 2020; 383:2603.
@BlairHealt68622 @blob1972453 @newstart_2024 They went through all three phases. https://t.co/YMj1nCguoy Safety and Efficacy of the BNT162b2 mRNA Covid-19 Vaccine | New England Journal of Medicine
@v22uta @takunari_ishida Safety and Efficacy of the BNT162b2 mRNA Covid-19 Vaccine BNT162b2 mRNA Covid-19 Vaccine in a Nationwide Mass Vaccination Setting Real-world effectiveness of the mRNA-1273 vaccine against COVID-19: Interim results from a prospective observational cohort study
RT @nnago: 治験がされていないというレベルで情報が届いていないのようなので情報提供。これこそいまさらですけど。2020年の12月です。とりあえず治験がされていないという人はこの論文を読みましょう。 https://t.co/FLgSZjDN45
@RealBooks66887 @dcpetterson @DrNeilStone Here ya go bucky "A total of 43,548 participants underwent randomization, of whom 43,448 received injections: 21,720 with BNT162b2 and 21,728 with placebo." https://t.co/ZF8yc1Ej4h https://t.co/8wHF77IJ09
治験がされていないというレベルで情報が届いていないのようなので情報提供。これこそいまさらですけど。2020年の12月です。とりあえず治験がされていないという人はこの論文を読みましょう。 https://t.co/FLgSZjDN45
@BlairHealt68622 @DavidWolfe Yet they did. https://t.co/YMj1nCguoy Safety and Efficacy of the BNT162b2 mRNA Covid-19 Vaccine | New England Journal of Medicine
@canceledmouse @campiche_sarah Désolé de t’avoir filé un document trop long à lire pour toi. https://t.co/aQAgSi7UH8 C’est pourtant une source officielle. Bye ! J’arrête de perdre mon temps. Tes copains te le diront.
@canceledmouse @campiche_sarah Non, pas tant que tu n’auras pas pris en compte https://t.co/aQAgSi7UH8 Qui prouve que ta mentor se plante sur ses données de départ. Ça la fout mal pour quelqu’un qui prétend sur les stats…
@canceledmouse @campiche_sarah Oh, comme c’est curieux, la preuve avait disparu, la voilà de retour : 40000 cobayes, pas 252 : https://t.co/aQAgSi7UH8
@canceledmouse @campiche_sarah Vos sources sont Christine Cotton, vous faites donc erreur. Plus de 40.000 cobayes ici les preuves : https://t.co/cyEbBcp53i De là vous pouvez trouver les sources d’origine : https://t.co/5POtzKIjQx https://t.co/aQAgSi7UH8
@Jeannemarie1309 @anglade_nicole @jerem71702021 @pjd77420 @TristanHurieff @guillaumed2025 @bene444444442 @TonJeanne @brigitte_sarry @zet_mood @Pr_Chabriere_E @Sq178kin @_mizmo @ChatSecouriste https://t.co/4nxFO3m9Bi
@Jeannemarie1309 @anglade_nicole @jerem71702021 @pjd77420 @TristanHurieff @guillaumed2025 @bene444444442 @TonJeanne @brigitte_sarry @zet_mood @Pr_Chabriere_E @Sq178kin @_mizmo @ChatSecouriste Mtn l’efficacité du vaccin Covid 19 https://t.co/4nxFO3m9Bi
@cornedim1970 @JutJul5 @SteigstraHerman 2020: https://t.co/4sCnMsDQ4u 2021: https://t.co/TwB04Vtnht 2024 (onder kinderen): https://t.co/c17vaxuA8o 2024 (incl. boosters): https://t.co/fLwvYtrIvB PubMed is een database van wetenschappelijke artikelen op het gebied van geneeskunde, biologie en volksgezondheid.
@BaehlerEric @ChomskyChannel @tentotheeighth @DrNeilStone We can move the goal post- that’s fine. https://t.co/qhoilaoRFz https://t.co/jXFYQz08IB https://t.co/T5QNFlrL8a I can send more, but these are the pivotal ones especially early on. These ones also have IS separated from observations, which is ideal to minimize bias.
@TomBauser @littlewisehen @BioNTech_Group Nach der Notfallzulassung startete die Post-Marketing-Überwachung (Phase 4) – das ist ganz normal. Die breite Bevölkerung war nicht "das Experiment", sondern wurde mit einem bereits getesteten Impfstoff geimpft. Quelle: https://t.co/HJW0tfWuat
@WaidhasMartina @bnuterix @schockimpark @littlewisehen Wer sich wirklich informiert, merkt: Nach der Zulassung gab es keine Placebo-Impfungen mehr in der regulären Impfkampagne. RKI-Protokolle beschreiben wissenschaftliche Begleitung – nicht verdeckte Placebo-Gabe. Quelle:NEJM Studie: https://t.co/HJW0tfWuat
@BiniKitty @_APWK_ Polack, F. P., et al. (2020). Safety and Efficacy of the BNT162b2 mRNA Covid-19 Vaccine. New England Journal of Medicine, 383(27), 2603–2615. https://t.co/LA5KY8YGXA
@BiniKitty @_APWK_ Polack, F. P., et al. (2020). Safety and Efficacy of the BNT162b2 mRNA Covid-19 Vaccine. New England Journal of Medicine, 383(27), 2603–2615. https://t.co/LA5KY8YGXA
@heterodoxtom @DopplerEffect93 @michaeljknowles No it wasn't. And LOL. Why are antivaxxers so stupid and gullible? Go read the paper. Safety and Efficacy of the BNT162b2 mRNA Covid-19 Vaccine | New England Journal of Medicine https://t.co/kI4u4i64Os
Safety and Efficacy of the BNT162b2 mRNA Covid-19 Vaccine | New England Journal of Medicine https://t.co/neYkzIpUTI
@SebastianV76221 @defapt Ai citit și tu un articol și acum ești geniu. Pfizer s-a dovedit a fi atât sigur cât și util pentru a opri Covid. https://t.co/10AowaAVQ3 https://t.co/7js8JpzFV9
@CITW_ @SecKennedy 1. Thomas SJ, Moreira ED Jr, Kitchin N, et al. Safety and Efficacy of the BNT162b2 mRNA Covid-19 Vaccine through 6 Months. N Engl J Med 2021; 385:1761.
@CITW_ @SecKennedy 1. Polack FP, Thomas SJ, Kitchin N, et al. Safety and Efficacy of the BNT162b2 mRNA Covid-19 Vaccine. N Engl J Med 2020; 383:2603.
@IncipitIntus @Michael_Yon @RealAlexJones When addressing questions about mRNA COVID vaccines like Pfizer-BioNTech and Moderna, I primarily reference pivotal clinical trials. For Pfizer-BioNTech, it’s the "Safety and Efficacy of the BNT162b2 mRNA Covid-19 Vaccine" study in the New England Journal of Medicine, showing 95%
@theaterdonnerer @Holginho44 @MedienfuzziShow Im England Journal of Medicine veröffentlicht: „Safety and Efficacy of the BNT162b2 mRNA Covid-19 Vaccine“ (Polack et al., 2020) Über 43.000 Teilnehmer, die randomisiert entweder den Impfstoff oder ein Placebo erhielte. Direkt auf der Website des New England Journal of Medicine.
RT @LockedFab: Exemple 1 : le vaccin Covid Pfizer que #FranceSoirFaitDeLaMerde a tout fait pour tenter de décrédibiliser : Autorisé sur la…
RT @LockedFab: Exemple 1 : le vaccin Covid Pfizer que #FranceSoirFaitDeLaMerde a tout fait pour tenter de décrédibiliser : Autorisé sur la…
https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC1114166/?utm_source=chatgpt.com ""A calculated risk": the Salk polio vaccine field trials of 1954 - PMC" [3]: https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMoa2034577?utm_source=chatgpt.com "Safety and Efficacy of the BNT162b2 mRNA Covid-19 (15/17)
risk: the Salk polio vaccine field trials of 1954," Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine ([PMC][2]) * Polack et al., "Safety and Efficacy of the BNT162b2 mRNA Covid‑19 Vaccine," *NEJM*, 2020 ([New England Journal of Medicine][3]) * Joura et al., "A 9‑Valent HPV Vaccine against (12/17)
@truthabits @caitiedelaney The idea that the vaccine was pushed to market without studies is just not true. They had studies with tens of thousands of people. Below is the literal placebo controlled study with 40000+ participants https://t.co/GRTVvLId3f
Exemple 1 : le vaccin Covid Pfizer que #FranceSoirFaitDeLaMerde a tout fait pour tenter de décrédibiliser : Autorisé sur la base d'un essai contre placebo. 2/9 https://t.co/GTShkeAbM5 https://t.co/A39GGKF58M
@thehealthb0t No other vaccines were tested against a placebo control is a blatant lie. Here are 3 vaccine studies that tested with saline placebo control then a link to loads more. https://t.co/p6DEfBs7Pk https://t.co/u3lgSpJpXC https://t.co/8dfhwjZS2Q https://t.co/9rvZSjXWYO
@cryptokyle_33 @JasonRumley_ @rthrash3 @whaditizzz @ChildrensHD @JennyMcCarthy Polack FP, Thomas SJ, Kitchin N, et al. Safety and Efficacy of the BNT162b2 mRNA Covid-19 Vaccine. N Engl J Med. 2020;383:2603–2615. [https://t.co/d8vnzIyndm]
@ShaunBMcGarry @SailOtisJ24 @DrNeilStone Polack FP, et al. Safety and Efficacy of the BNT162b2 mRNA Covid-19 Vaccine. New England Journal of Medicine. 2020 Efficacy and Safety of the mRNA-1273 SARS-CoV-2 Vaccine. New England Journal of Medicine. 2021 Many more under demand, you could just look for it, dick.
@chris_darnielle @DrNeilStone And here's yet ANOTHER placebo controlled vaccine study: https://t.co/EK6Qz4EiEG
@56Morbihan @Catcat97553138 @EatcatAlf @lonnibesancon @Mounotella @GillesP221997 @Franck20270 @SteveRand133 @Marc_Fournier_ @OncleLucifer @VeriteDiffusee @benoitm_mtl @DanbQc @tvlofficiel @f_philippot Comment ? Avec de la volonté et de l’organisation. C’est documenté dans l’article de synthèse de ces tests. Raoult a affirmé avoir effectué ses tests d’efficacité de l’HCQ en 20 jours (hélas un mort, mais aucun avec le placebo
@rwmgn79991 @MoU16T8HBooKZXq @studiocorvo @iC5qmR3b7C60014 @niken_hunter @craneopesan @grok Polack FP, et al. Safety and Efficacy of the BNT162b2 mRNA Covid-19 Vaccine. N Engl J Med, 2020. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2034577 8.
@M_22154 @JasonT28358737 @TheJoddon @DrNeilStone 1. Thomas SJ, Moreira ED Jr, Kitchin N, et al. Safety and Efficacy of the BNT162b2 mRNA Covid-19 Vaccine through 6 Months. N Engl J Med 2021; 385:1761.
@M_22154 @JasonT28358737 @TheJoddon @DrNeilStone 1. Polack FP, Thomas SJ, Kitchin N, et al. Safety and Efficacy of the BNT162b2 mRNA Covid-19 Vaccine. N Engl J Med 2020; 383:2603.
@AS74900963 @FanCooler2 pochissime persone tra i vaccinati, VENTI VOLTE tanto tra i non vaccinati. Se ti sembra poco... https://t.co/1ql0PewUCh Ovvio che gli effetti collaterali più rari possono sfuggire in un campione di 18.000 persone ed essere evidenti quando ne vaccini miliardi. Ma la gente moriva! https://t.co/veGm9aMY0t
al. "Safety and Efficacy of the BNT162b2 mRNA Covid-19 Vaccine." *The New England Journal of Medicine*, vol. 383, no. 27, 2020, pp. 2603-2615. https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMoa2034577. Thompson, Mark G., et al. (9/12)
@KrzysioJezyna @mamciag @PawelKuki https://t.co/C4YXVJyuqv :)
@rustbeltmaga @BobBobb660056 1. Thomas SJ, Moreira ED Jr, Kitchin N, et al. Safety and Efficacy of the BNT162b2 mRNA Covid-19 Vaccine through 6 Months. N Engl J Med 2021; 385:1761.
@rustbeltmaga @BobBobb660056 1. Polack FP, Thomas SJ, Kitchin N, et al. Safety and Efficacy of the BNT162b2 mRNA Covid-19 Vaccine. N Engl J Med 2020; 383:2603.
@LaffingMunkyboy @ghackethorn @rustbeltmaga @Keegan59992745 1. Thomas SJ, Moreira ED Jr, Kitchin N, et al. Safety and Efficacy of the BNT162b2 mRNA Covid-19 Vaccine through 6 Months. N Engl J Med 2021; 385:1761.
@LaffingMunkyboy @ghackethorn @rustbeltmaga @Keegan59992745 1. Polack FP, Thomas SJ, Kitchin N, et al. Safety and Efficacy of the BNT162b2 mRNA Covid-19 Vaccine. N Engl J Med 2020; 383:2603.
@KingSlenderNES @locephaly @lxeagle17 Here is one: "Safety and Efficacy of the BNT162b2 mRNA Covid-19 Vaccine" (Published in The New England Journal of Medicine, December 2020) The majority of anti-vaxxers react from an emotional state based on fears, anxieties of perception of little power in their lives.
@tonyamerica1776 @RiverRatOG @yashar @l_e_whyte 1. Polack FP, Thomas SJ, Kitchin N, et al. Safety and Efficacy of the BNT162b2 mRNA Covid-19 Vaccine. N Engl J Med 2020; 383:2603.
@RiverRatOG @odinikaeze @yashar @l_e_whyte 1. Thomas SJ, Moreira ED Jr, Kitchin N, et al. Safety and Efficacy of the BNT162b2 mRNA Covid-19 Vaccine through 6 Months. N Engl J Med 2021; 385:1761.
@RiverRatOG @odinikaeze @yashar @l_e_whyte 1. Polack FP, Thomas SJ, Kitchin N, et al. Safety and Efficacy of the BNT162b2 mRNA Covid-19 Vaccine. N Engl J Med 2020; 383:2603.
@Atreviz @ducavendish @Carius1976 "Safety and Efficacy of the BNT162b2 mRNA Covid-19 Vaccine" Link: https://t.co/r1BuCiq2VM "Efficacy and Safety of the mRNA-1273 SARS-CoV-2 Vaccine" Link: https://t.co/m9ozxATdjW "No Evidence of SARS-CoV-2 Reverse Transcription and Integration into the Human Genome" Link:
@Carius1976 @Atreviz @ducavendish "Safety and Efficacy of the BNT162b2 mRNA Covid-19 Vaccine" Link: https://t.co/r1BuCiq2VM "Efficacy and Safety of the mRNA-1273 SARS-CoV-2 Vaccine" Link: https://t.co/m9ozxATdjW "No Evidence of SARS-CoV-2 Reverse Transcription and Integration into the Human Genome" Link:
@MarvinSkyhorse @VolTraveller @DrNeilStone 1. Thomas SJ, Moreira ED Jr, Kitchin N, et al. Safety and Efficacy of the BNT162b2 mRNA Covid-19 Vaccine through 6 Months. N Engl J Med 2021; 385:1761.
@MarvinSkyhorse @VolTraveller @DrNeilStone Where do anti-vaxx fucktards like you actually live and work? 1. Polack FP, Thomas SJ, Kitchin N, et al. Safety and Efficacy of the BNT162b2 mRNA Covid-19 Vaccine. N Engl J Med 2020; 383:2603.
@ShaunBMcGarry @DrNeilStone 1. Thomas SJ, Moreira ED Jr, Kitchin N, et al. Safety and Efficacy of the BNT162b2 mRNA Covid-19 Vaccine through 6 Months. N Engl J Med 2021; 385:1761.
@ShaunBMcGarry @DrNeilStone 1. Polack FP, Thomas SJ, Kitchin N, et al. Safety and Efficacy of the BNT162b2 mRNA Covid-19 Vaccine. N Engl J Med 2020; 383:2603.
@Jikkyleaks @MarwickAnna @Engineer4Health 1. Polack, F. P., et al. (2020). "Safety and Efficacy of the BNT162b2 mRNA Covid-19 Vaccine." New England Journal of Medicine, 383(27), 2603-2615. RCT Details: Phase 3 RCT for Pfizer-BioNTech (BNT162b2), ~43,000 participants, vaccine vs. placebo. Findings: 95% efficacy
@Kristi3King @Mrbandot1 @acnewsitics 1. Thomas SJ, Moreira ED Jr, Kitchin N, et al. Safety and Efficacy of the BNT162b2 mRNA Covid-19 Vaccine through 6 Months. N Engl J Med 2021; 385:1761.
@Kristi3King @Mrbandot1 @acnewsitics 1. Polack FP, Thomas SJ, Kitchin N, et al. Safety and Efficacy of the BNT162b2 mRNA Covid-19 Vaccine. N Engl J Med 2020; 383:2603.
@grok @carl_jurassic @Jikkyleaks @EMUSBACKAGAIN @kerry_echo @joeyjojojunior_ @elonmusk @EMU Why wasn't absolute risk reduction data provided by Pfizer in the "Safety and Efficacy of the BNT162b2 mRNA Covid-19 vaccine", if FDA guidelines *require* both relative AND absolute risk reduction data? https://t.co/fd4qo2fwur
RT @IntegralAnswers: @fools_destiny @joeroganhq @Debunk_the_Funk runs circles around me. Check out his work. https://t.co/kLRkCUJ3Wi
@IamBrookJackson Actually https://t.co/WZIJSnu3ST
@Tixe_Atrebla @DoyougrokGary @dezo23 @mcclunkeys @DrNeilStone 1. Thomas SJ, Moreira ED Jr, Kitchin N, et al. Safety and Efficacy of the BNT162b2 mRNA Covid-19 Vaccine through 6 Months. N Engl J Med 2021; 385:1761.
@Tixe_Atrebla @DoyougrokGary @dezo23 @mcclunkeys @DrNeilStone 1. Polack FP, Thomas SJ, Kitchin N, et al. Safety and Efficacy of the BNT162b2 mRNA Covid-19 Vaccine. N Engl J Med 2020; 383:2603.
@BPerroden5798 @WaitingForPerot @BradIsley @RonDobson14 @lpackard 1. Thomas SJ, Moreira ED Jr, Kitchin N, et al. Safety and Efficacy of the BNT162b2 mRNA Covid-19 Vaccine through 6 Months. N Engl J Med 2021; 385:1761.
@BPerroden5798 @WaitingForPerot @BradIsley @RonDobson14 @lpackard 1. Polack FP, Thomas SJ, Kitchin N, et al. Safety and Efficacy of the BNT162b2 mRNA Covid-19 Vaccine. N Engl J Med 2020; 383:2603.
@BlairHealt68622 @ianfmusgrave @ABridgen @jclinicalinvest This is a science article.. https://t.co/roZp7z4nI9
Safety and Efficacy of the BNT162b2 mRNA Covid-19 Vaccine | New England Journal of Medicine https://t.co/rbMaoTVzjs
@GvB1480 @Martin_Moder Keine Ahnung welchen Blödsinn du da gelesen hast, aber weder in der Zulassungsstudie https://t.co/XzU4kI0iuI, noch in den ausführlicheren Berichten für die FDA spiegelt sich das wieder. Quelle?
RT @EricsElectrons: @newstart_2024 @NancyRPearcey “Safety and Efficacy of the BNT162b2 mRNA Covid-19 Vaccine" by Polack et al was a randomi…
RT @EricsElectrons: @newstart_2024 @NancyRPearcey “Safety and Efficacy of the BNT162b2 mRNA Covid-19 Vaccine" by Polack et al was a randomi…
RT @EricsElectrons: @newstart_2024 @NancyRPearcey “Safety and Efficacy of the BNT162b2 mRNA Covid-19 Vaccine" by Polack et al was a randomi…
RT @NeySuiter: @RobertoZeballo7 Parabéns pela honestidade. O que o Dr. Zeballos afirma está lastreado por cerca de 68 pesquisas, entre elas…
@LusulGorfou @nicolasberrod @le_Parisien >aucune étude Vous devez peut être essayer de lire les 3 premières pages de : ‘La médecine pour les désespérément nuls qui lisent des conneries sur Internet.’ https://t.co/OgttQdYaJx
@ShadyNeutron @MdBreathe https://t.co/1Y0IltGvr3
@dvinepunishment @leopoldolfmv @BiazitaGomes @mahpenna https://t.co/CT1HQJ7Oyh
@the_real_emu @SHomburg @elonmusk @POTUS Doubting is per se good Doubting all & everything resulting in non acceptance of factual reality is bad https://t.co/OzDwtK3Ld5
@SHomburg @elonmusk @POTUS Read vs posting non sensical disinformation . Doubting is good . Doubting everything to the extent of distorting reality is bad https://t.co/OzDwtK3Ld5
@LiseJelena @Chamchamat @BisonDakar @DrJeromeMarty Vous vous écoutez parler. La réduction de la transmission est un plus, la mise sur le marché fut autorisée sur base des tests de sécurité et efficacité. C'est la gloire de la science de ne pas affirmer sans preuve. Mise sur le marché : https://t.co/OgttQdXCTZ
@LindbergPhoto @Tullingebo @r_hellqvist Nja, det har gjorts studier där covidvaccin jämförts med placebo för att säkerställa effekt och säkerhet. Idag vore dylika studier oetiska. https://t.co/PuqujhLt4i
@Micha65197606 @Nero51751331 @_Yuzus_ @konopskyy Źle się wyraziłem ale badania kliniczne były bardziej optymistyczne "BNT162b2 was 95% effective in preventing Covid-19 (95% credible)" https://t.co/fTrimLndj4
@charbonnie41003 @lonnibesancon Tu vis dans une putain de grotte ? L'info est publique depuis *4 ANS* https://t.co/7QM24Ozfhs
@FredDesgrottes @lonnibesancon Tiens c'est cadeau , note la date ... https://t.co/7QM24Ozfhs
@JohnDoe78322302 @franceinfo En pratique, oui. Aucun mensonge. https://t.co/OgttQdXCTZ
@AvocatduPeuple @franceinfo Si .. https://t.co/OgttQdYaJx
@ThemeAnna76213 @franceinfo @ansm Service … 44000 personnes enrôlées… https://t.co/OgttQdXCTZ
RT @NeySuiter: @RobertoZeballo7 Parabéns pela honestidade. O que o Dr. Zeballos afirma está lastreado por cerca de 68 pesquisas, entre elas…
@RobertoZeballo7 Parabéns pela honestidade. O que o Dr. Zeballos afirma está lastreado por cerca de 68 pesquisas, entre elas: https://t.co/CH4WkY7GY3 https://t.co/lZGKIAlvqE https://t.co/89rLM3Hk01 https://t.co/GkTaANt1Kd https://t.co/0gsv7V01y9 https://t.co/oxjqwiJXoV https://t.co/V246qUmwjv
@BillAckman @RobertKennedyJr And he’s still shown to be clearly lying in that podcast. https://t.co/HjY5UJkql5
@MikeReitan26413 @230NBroad Oh, I have for the past 20 years. For example….. https://t.co/QsWoR7y2Wp
@MikeRoy_Cit12 @ShadowluzHPS @AnnaRMatson You need to listen the many many people who’ve pointed out that RFK Jr is completely ignorant about these issues. Here’s a start for you. https://t.co/tmGAQfV3QZ
@BlairHealt68622 @AnnaRMatson Point out a single mistake in the video from @thereal_truther . He has referenced every statement in video in detail. Re: RFK Jr’s appearance in Rogan https://t.co/EmFeadNWnZ
@Kosch3076 @leakys J'espère qu'avec mes liens, tu auras réussi au moins à remettre l'électricité au norme chez toi. https://t.co/m3rkZwcXfY https://t.co/zqiHhuEYqj https://t.co/5EtLGR3woU
@tabaco_logic @cfouucault @Nathanor380034 https://t.co/kTQX38C5Yj "Methods: In an ongoing multinational, placebo-controlled, observer-blinded, pivotal efficacy trial..." Pourquoi personne ne pointe ça du doigt ? Moi j'ai pas de problème pour qu'on dise qu'il n'y a pas d'étude sérieuse, mais faut pas être sélectif.
References
@janiedelaney @Mediaite Safety and efficacy of 2-dose regimen (multiple injections). Better efficacy. https://t.co/QuQSFljUTs https://t.co/B8OK52vqE3
RT @IntegralAnswers: @fools_destiny @joeroganhq @Debunk_the_Funk runs circles around me. Check out his work. https://t.co/kLRkCUJ3Wi
RT @IntegralAnswers: @fools_destiny @joeroganhq @Debunk_the_Funk runs circles around me. Check out his work. https://t.co/kLRkCUJ3Wi
RT @IntegralAnswers: @fools_destiny @joeroganhq @Debunk_the_Funk runs circles around me. Check out his work. https://t.co/kLRkCUJ3Wi
RT @IntegralAnswers: @fools_destiny @joeroganhq @Debunk_the_Funk runs circles around me. Check out his work. https://t.co/kLRkCUJ3Wi
RT @IntegralAnswers: @fools_destiny @joeroganhq @Debunk_the_Funk runs circles around me. Check out his work. https://t.co/kLRkCUJ3Wi
@joeroganhq More. https://t.co/H7KEGBTmbH
@fools_destiny @joeroganhq @Debunk_the_Funk runs circles around me. Check out his work. https://t.co/kLRkCUJ3Wi
@LanaGulp56 @KasprzykRemi Sans tests préalables ? 44000 personnes enrôlées …. https://t.co/OgttQdYaJx
RT @Dieselfahrer2: @propaganda_nerd Das im Dezember 2020 publizierte Paper von Polack et al. ("95% Wirksamkeit"
@propaganda_nerd Das im Dezember 2020 publizierte Paper von Polack et al. ("95% Wirksamkeit"
@malamafrance12 Jean-Michel, vous avez des certitudes alors que vous n’avez aucune connaissance dans le processus de mise sur le marché d’un médicament. Pour ce qui est de l’efficacité tout est là. https://t.co/UpmOMF6WQs
@BarryESharp @Tellit007 Oh Barry; to didn’t even want to discuss the first paper because it hurt your feelings! https://t.co/roZp7z4nI9
@lupolynesia @SahabiaAli @RChabriet @lonnibesancon @IvanElKaroui @doc_roll https://t.co/RVRLjtwU68 petit bilan sur les risques de myocardites datant d'un an.
RT @byronlacroix: @mehdirhasan Kennedy is a massive liar. Here’s a 48 minute deep dive into Kennedy’s lies. https://t.co/9eGaX1yfFX
RT @IntegralAnswers: @jsssully Dr. Peter Hotez has been on Joe’s Show. Regarding debating an attorney and a scientifically illiterate or…
RT @IntegralAnswers: @jsssully Dr. Peter Hotez has been on Joe’s Show. Regarding debating an attorney and a scientifically illiterate or…
@jsssully Dr. Peter Hotez has been on Joe’s Show. Regarding debating an attorney and a scientifically illiterate or a disingenuous bad faith actor, RFK Jr, it’s a no win situation. RFK Jr literally lies so often it’s hard to tell which of the two he is. https://t.co/yJoYlIOS2p
@MelissaLaTour6 @muse_mule @AV24org I encourage you to. She tells him about an hour and three minutes in that he sounds like an anti-vaxxer in her opinion. Got listen to this too. https://t.co/S3T7GTZkFO
@fatwelshbloke @DrNeilStone https://t.co/OgttQdXCTZ
@Political_Bears @sheislaurenlee @Blessed_Patriot Pfizer
@warofthesaints @cliffhaston55 @DrNeilStone The MERS RNA vaccine was tested in 2014. The ‘Pfizer’ vaccine is in fact the BioNTech vaccine. 44000 persons (everywhere on earth) were involved in the phase3 tests. ‘Animals issues’ is Internet BS. Katalin Karikó (BioNtech)received the 2023 Nobel. https://t.co/OgttQdYaJx
@32Elmudo @FdL2compette @KasprzykRemi @francebleue
@Censored4sure @GVWORLDPEACE Here you go https://t.co/7gPVYYpJ6j
@BuzzkillF @wolsned Pfizer did not say “trust me bro”, they said this: https://t.co/roZp7z4VxH
@salmondota @labsarekindest @PatrioticPizzas @DrNeilStone https://t.co/t5eMgMgQVK https://t.co/gTiNdxd3Xs
@RidQuantumDrive @tugui35000 @VieDeCarabin Si ; Laczko et al., 2020 Analyse de conformation correcte (résultats, section 2).
@RidQuantumDrive @tugui35000 @VieDeCarabin Voici un liste non exhaustive des études menées : Laczko et al., 2020 :
@_LeBeauMarcel @wargonm https://t.co/OgttQdYaJx
@FrancisRau67 @wargonm https://t.co/OgttQdXCTZ
@defair_phil @wargonm Rien ? Dans France-Soir, certes. https://t.co/OgttQdYaJx
@IcelandRaphael @franceinter Effectivement https://t.co/OgttQdYaJx
@pepe4573 @franceinter Service https://t.co/OgttQdYaJx
@PeterMcCormack @DrAseemMalhotra Lots of people have been deceived by him. https://t.co/VVHku5cVRd
RT @byronlacroix: @mehdirhasan Kennedy is a massive liar. Here’s a 48 minute deep dive into Kennedy’s lies. https://t.co/9eGaX1yfFX
JFKJr spews lies & more lies @joerogan re-spews these lies @SenateGOP DO NOT CONFIRM https://t.co/SYvod8Z1MJ
More JFKJr BS Do NOT confirm @SenateGOP All Drs & medical scientists should join me in this opinion https://t.co/mPAHtId1Mv
@EndTribalism @KyleJSaw https://t.co/ob1ujug1Yb
@EndTribalism https://t.co/ob1ujug1Yb
@c_plushie RFK Jr is so full of shit, his eyes are brown. Joe Rogan's worst misinformation yet, with RFK Jr. https://t.co/JmaYcx2nh8
@azrael_333 @thereal_truther RFK Jr is just wrong about many things. Listen, in his own words, he lies about his conversation with Paul Offit. https://t.co/xYsw8139W1
again saline is not a worst case scenario using the adjuvant formulation is Safety and Efficacy of the BNT162b2 mRNA COVID-19 Vaccine New England Journal of Medicine, 2020 Randomized Trial of DTaP Vaccine Safety and Immunogenicity in Infants Pediatrics and Vaccine.
So you're claim is the MRNA vaccine did not pass any clinical tests? Well, that is wrong. Here is a paper on the tests. pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33301246/
@ParcodiGiacomo Ex multis: Polack, F. P., Thomas, S. J., Kitchin, N., Absalon, J., Gurtman, A., Lockhart, S., … Gruber, W. C. (2020). Safety and Efficacy of the BNT162b2 mRNA Covid-19 Vaccine. New England Journal of Medicine, 383(27), 2603–2615. https://t.co/xRFmYmS2xA Uno dei primi...
@HankBarflyer @futuroprossimo @pbecchi Sicuro? https://t.co/f512PsIA6k https://t.co/qlSPiQsLVh
@alex_arnhem @BertvanVondel @hansvantelling Klopt niet: animal testing: https://t.co/AGSD71v5Ht en https://t.co/i6K9S3wtOk clinical trial: https://t.co/hgFS3DOxWQ Ze zijn getest. Dus wat in dat filmpje gezegd wordt is totale onzin.
@PSNLIN3 @CYFRA_GOV_PL Jest to oczywiście bzdura: https://t.co/FxVjFd9TEd https://t.co/K5vXwpWJ5h
@andrzejamb @PSNLIN3 Niestety - jest to bzdura. https://t.co/A5867svdvT
@PSNLIN3 No to proszę bardzo, obalone ad hoc: https://t.co/A5867svdvT Nie dziękujcie :3
@Liberty19588390 @deerbrian Debunk the Funk will go through things point by point. https://t.co/BYvPY5negh
@PeterMcCormack @DrAseemMalhotra Recap on stuff he is wrong about https://t.co/NOhtJZ4PH6
RT @THERESASMI34612: @I_Am_JohnCullen @CartlandDavid Yes it is ! Here’s the proof Safety and Efficacy of the BNT162b2 mRNA Covid-19 Vaccine…
@DrAseemMalhotra Was the signal highlighted by data and was the data indisputable ? https://t.co/xc45x9NxS8
@I_Am_JohnCullen @CartlandDavid Yes it is ! Here’s the proof Safety and Efficacy of the BNT162b2 mRNA Covid-19 Vaccine https://t.co/et4lKpymcH
@KenelmTonkin @clairlemon RFK Jr’s Vaccine and Covid claims debunked https://t.co/9LgedqM7Ex
@KenelmTonkin @clairlemon I liked this video… (I know that’s not as convenient as an article) https://t.co/nAJp6opw07
RT @iXeno: @PatrickSquirrel @TorySnyc @djt10 @DopplerEffect93 @CaryDavid722 @mass_rising @higgsri @Lorenzo7127 @BlairHealt68622 @ncdave4lif…
RT @DrSusanOliver1: Another reminder of everything that he is wrong about: https://t.co/T2V4NDbNso
RT @DrSusanOliver1: Another reminder of everything that he is wrong about: https://t.co/T2V4NDbNso
RT @DrSusanOliver1: Another reminder of everything that he is wrong about: https://t.co/T2V4NDbNso
RT @DrSusanOliver1: Another reminder of everything that he is wrong about: https://t.co/T2V4NDbNso
RT @DrSusanOliver1: Another reminder of everything that he is wrong about: https://t.co/T2V4NDbNso
Another reminder of everything that he is wrong about: https://t.co/T2V4NDbNso
@RoelsMaarten Ik zal u wat vertellen, met wetenschappelijke artikels in de video description. https://t.co/s7ZtuqiHoP https://t.co/6PhE0TbNaq
@jrs_1202 @CaulfieldTim @McGillOSS https://t.co/XcivqcX9f7
@TommyeAugustin @HartsanFIN @sakke_p @ivanpuopolo En yleensä mielellään vastaa videolinkillä, mutta tässä on vaan niin erinomainen tiivistelmä: https://t.co/pj7iWNHjMz
@dirk_vandebergh Natuurlijk. Een antivax wap. Past perfect tussen de clowns dat trump selecteert voor de clowns in zijn circus. https://t.co/s7ZtuqiHoP https://t.co/6PhE0TbNaq
@Tom_as_Christ @nettebel @beeckman_pierre @M_Herbosch @torfsrik oh ja. Dit: https://t.co/s7ZtuqiHoP https://t.co/6PhE0TbNaq
@Kuifjesdream Stil jongen. Vort. Terug in uw mand. https://t.co/s7ZtuqiHoP https://t.co/6PhE0TbNaq
@DS_2691 @Kuifjesdream Hier is Kennedy voor u. Wetenschappelijke artikels in de links aanwezig. Die kerel heeft bloed aan zijn handen, de geschifte liegende gek. https://t.co/s7ZtuqiHoP https://t.co/6PhE0TbNaq
@mentalfundalist @vbergeng @Kuifjesdream @vanranstmarc Ik zal 2 voorbeeldjes aanreiken. De kloot heeft bloed aan zijn handen. De wetenschappelijke artikels staan ook in de links. Iets Kennedy niet heeft, buiten zijn "eigen wappie mening". https://t.co/s7ZtuqiHoP https://t.co/6PhE0TbNaq
@torfsrik Kijk Rik. Het soort leugenachtig crimineel waarvoor u het opneemt. De wetenschappelijke links staan onder de video's. Wetenschappelijke links. Geen Bijbelverzen. https://t.co/s7ZtuqiHoP https://t.co/6PhE0TbNaq
@lenigeliefde Ik geeft het u weer LETTERLIJK. Leugens uit zijn mond (ook het autisme verhaal), die de grond in worden geboord. Met wetenschappelijke studies in de links. Iets dat Kennedy zelf niet heeft. Nooit. https://t.co/6PhE0TbNaq
@FunLovingIan @DrSusanOliver1 She completely dismantled his nonsense talking points, did you even watch the clip ?
@JAC4SC @mpc_xetts @DrSusanOliver1 @RobertKennedyJr Watch the video, he says exactly that
@iluminatibot @LT_Aust
@JSHbabble @concretemilk Here’s are some nuanced long form counters for your pleasure. His critics abound too bruh https://t.co/mKqSIt1vRW
@krystalball https://t.co/xuKR0vpSPy
@KyleKulinski https://t.co/xuKR0vqqF6
@ComicDaveSmith @RobertKennedyJr He is nothing but a liar but all you retards that want to suck up to Joe Rogan so he keeps on inviting you fuckos will never acknowledge that https://t.co/xuKR0vpSPy
@RealDoctorMike @lexfridman What do you think of this video? https://t.co/xuKR0vpSPy
@woody93185 I have made a few videos about RFK Jr too: https://t.co/6iCrixQnQs
Yeah take a look at this video from @Debunk_the_Funk who did a great job in showing why America WON’T be healthy again https://t.co/c8MgY5d7xJ https://t.co/n3QOLNI0N8
@RTVCes F. Polack, S. Thomas, N. Kitchin, et al. Safety and efficacy of the BNT162b2 mRNA Covid-19 vaccine. N Engl J Med, 383 https://t.co/6IUKLmEIM5 M. Voysey, S. Clemens, S. Madhi Safety and efficacy of the ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 vaccine (AZD1222) against SARS-CoV-2 https://t.co/ZBGq6xcDfP
@mehdirhasan https://t.co/6AIJwsBJBi
@msabouri @CamillusLellis @CaulfieldTim @derekberes @DrJenGunter @jonathanstea @AntibioticDoc @doritmi @RyanMarino @StanKutcher @SolNataMD @SabiVM @BlakeMMurdoch @jeremyfaust You can easily look up videos of him saying these things. The fact you think it is only “deranged partisans” that claim he said it is you experiencing cognitive dissonance. https://t.co/ASUVK7k7vT https://t.co/eR72rv1Sqt https://t.co/MHV8s8gApf
RT @scottsantens: @billmaher Yes, because he's lying. It's a lie to say vaccines aren't tested against placebos. They all are. Double-blind…
@RobertKennedyJr A million people died in this country from Covid and many of them were unvaccinated. #MakeAmericaSickAgain https://t.co/kCAJSbmP7h
@AV24org @RobertKennedyJr #MakeAmericaSickAgain https://t.co/yxzSFEiV93
@Holden_Culotta #MakeAmericaSickAgain https://t.co/IGQVaVMo9f
@RobertKennedyJr @joerogan #MakeAmericaSickAgain https://t.co/LDqxDzDzGp
RT @DrSusanOliver1: Dr Aseem Malhotra is at it again! This time peddling his to lies to @StevenBartlett on The Diary of a CEO who didn't c…
RT @dmp267: @sheislaurenlee #MakeAmericaSickAgain https://t.co/pXe3J8zbLG
RT @dmp267: @sheislaurenlee #MakeAmericaSickAgain https://t.co/pXe3J8zbLG
RT @dmp267: @sheislaurenlee #MakeAmericaSickAgain https://t.co/pXe3J8zbLG
@GSerenityUK @OMG_Mum @Voices4Vaccines Dan who? Dr. Dan Wilson? Feel free to tell me where Dr. Wilson got it wrong regarding the Rogan - RFK interview. https://t.co/9mOzs4n6aa
RT @dmp267: @sheislaurenlee #MakeAmericaSickAgain https://t.co/pXe3J8zbLG
@sheislaurenlee Every accusation is a confession. https://t.co/xW9ACPwTta
RT @dmp267: @sheislaurenlee #MakeAmericaSickAgain https://t.co/pXe3J8zbLG
@sheislaurenlee #MakeAmericaSickAgain https://t.co/pXe3J8zbLG
@RobertKennedyJr #MakeAmericaSickAgain https://t.co/zSJWNJQf59
@AV24org @RobertKennedyJr @TeamTrump #MakeAmericaSickAgain https://t.co/lQhCO0Ppim
@RobertKennedyJr @joerogan @ShawnRyan762 @realDonaldTrump #MakeAmericaSickAgain https://t.co/nTsdBEMxPJ
@Holden_Culotta @joerogan @ShawnRyan762 #MakeAmericaSickAgain https://t.co/mWW3fLcxXP
@AV24org @joerogan @ShawnRyan762 #MakeAmericaSickAgain https://t.co/uMjNiWJFJc
@RobertKennedyJr @joerogan @ShawnRyan762 #MakeAmericaSickAgain https://t.co/xV1tXgXrLc
@AnnaRMatson #MakeAmericaSickAgain https://t.co/LLpdjmsyXL
@AV24org @RobertKennedyJr #MakeAmericaSickAgain https://t.co/jS3Ge0wgb8
@AnnaRMatson #MakeAmericaSickAgain https://t.co/XF0XdsIvMp
@AV24org @RobertKennedyJr @SenRonJohnson @HighWireTalk #MakeAmericaSickAgain https://t.co/4BQAbAMdwp
@EndTribalism #MakeAmericaSickAgain https://t.co/O5AkmkxLcm
@TonyShrieves @TheFreds @DrAseemMalhotra Not me mate. But I challenge you to watch this video that shows some real truths about Malhotra's work and his false claims. He is a fraud. https://t.co/6HAc2twkTL
RT @scottsantens: @lexfridman @RobertKennedyJr Interview @Debunk_the_Funk or at least watch some of his RFK videos first. Also it's not go…
RT @scottsantens: @lexfridman @RobertKennedyJr Interview @Debunk_the_Funk or at least watch some of his RFK videos first. Also it's not go…
@PhillyTechGuy @Patchito @emilyakopp Have you listened to Hotez on Rogan in 2019? Also, if RFK really wants a debar with a real scientist, @Debunk_the_Funk might be willing… https://t.co/kYDmqWQH8S
@sheislaurenlee https://t.co/PcEYxKJcM9
@LuvFotos @FiveTimesAugust Simple, his grift is based on his lies. He makes money by lying about vaccines, autism, AIDS, measles, and many other childhood diseases. Here is a good overview of some of RFK Jr’s vaccine related lies. https://t.co/31j2HvxWxl
@AnnaRMatson https://t.co/JIZTAEPOeb
@RobSchneider https://t.co/7KdgQLUObb
@beinlibertarian @RobertKennedyJr https://t.co/ZoQtfCSTBN
@loanly_hipster @RobertKennedyJr @realDonaldTrump https://t.co/ZoQtfCSTBN
@AV24org @RobertKennedyJr https://t.co/enUfbToxH5
@Holden_Culotta @RobertKennedyJr https://t.co/enUfbToxH5
@Christo09076004 @KennedyForTheW Oh, debunk the funk has already done a great job of that. https://t.co/V7NX7PQLK5
@Cultuurfilosoof RFK Jr. is een zwaar geestelijk gestoorde complotdenker. #gevaarlijkegek
@MediaKanto https://t.co/8JJvhZYN79
@missisdoyl @Debunk_the_Funk @RobertKennedyJr You’ve never watched a debunk the funk video, have you? He has definitely does talk about vaccine injury. He doesn’t interview people. He makes explainer vids against liars like RFK. https://t.co/b8JpVZH7za
@kennedy2024__ @audragold @RobertKennedyJr I’ve listened to the first two hours, I think after that he gets off the vaccine stuff. You should check out debunks of it. https://t.co/hd7OzlWAJf
@DrAseemMalhotra People might have believed you but then you published your ‘most important work’ and it turned out to be garbage. https://t.co/0eKlzqwiO5
@joerogan https://t.co/10UN7vCfXs
@scholten_rik @mkeulemans Hij is een antivaxer, een leugenaar en een gevaarlijke gek. https://t.co/Qc8Q0zqCPY
@sudokuvariante @fluidloading @FlorianLemaitr5 @xja1993 @bitchwitch1969 @RicoGoth @RChabriet @lePlaymobil28 @lonnibesancon @fabrice_frank @Maitre_Eolas De quoi parles-tu le menteur pathologique ? https://t.co/GTShkeAbM5 https://t.co/ui4kvnaXrx
@rokdevil @AesPolitics1 @RobertKennedyJr 2) Ref: RFK Jr the antivaxer: https://t.co/eSm3SeOzYx
RT @byronlacroix: @optimaestro @angie_rasmussen Kennedy is a dumbshit. His books are riddled with errors, bad reasoning and outright lies.…
@optimaestro @angie_rasmussen Kennedy is a dumbshit. His books are riddled with errors, bad reasoning and outright lies. https://t.co/1qnUg4iEwI
RT @DrSusanOliver1: Dr Aseem Malhotra is at it again! This time peddling his to lies to @StevenBartlett on The Diary of a CEO who didn't c…
RT @DrSusanOliver1: Dr Aseem Malhotra is at it again! This time peddling his to lies to @StevenBartlett on The Diary of a CEO who didn't c…
RT @DrSusanOliver1: Dr Aseem Malhotra is at it again! This time peddling his to lies to @StevenBartlett on The Diary of a CEO who didn't c…
RT @DrSusanOliver1: Dr Aseem Malhotra is at it again! This time peddling his to lies to @StevenBartlett on The Diary of a CEO who didn't c…
RT @DrSusanOliver1: Dr Aseem Malhotra is at it again! This time peddling his to lies to @StevenBartlett on The Diary of a CEO who didn't c…
RT @DrSusanOliver1: Dr Aseem Malhotra is at it again! This time peddling his to lies to @StevenBartlett on The Diary of a CEO who didn't c…
RT @DrSusanOliver1: Dr Aseem Malhotra is at it again! This time peddling his to lies to @StevenBartlett on The Diary of a CEO who didn't c…
RT @DrSusanOliver1: Dr Aseem Malhotra is at it again! This time peddling his to lies to @StevenBartlett on The Diary of a CEO who didn't c…
RT @DrSusanOliver1: Dr Aseem Malhotra is at it again! This time peddling his to lies to @StevenBartlett on The Diary of a CEO who didn't c…
RT @DrSusanOliver1: Dr Aseem Malhotra is at it again! This time peddling his to lies to @StevenBartlett on The Diary of a CEO who didn't c…
RT @DrSusanOliver1: Dr Aseem Malhotra is at it again! This time peddling his to lies to @StevenBartlett on The Diary of a CEO who didn't c…
RT @DrSusanOliver1: Dr Aseem Malhotra is at it again! This time peddling his to lies to @StevenBartlett on The Diary of a CEO who didn't c…
RT @DrSusanOliver1: Dr Aseem Malhotra is at it again! This time peddling his to lies to @StevenBartlett on The Diary of a CEO who didn't c…
RT @DrSusanOliver1: Dr Aseem Malhotra is at it again! This time peddling his to lies to @StevenBartlett on The Diary of a CEO who didn't c…
@_johnbye @DrSusanOliver1 has just released an updated video on that paper of Malhotra's. "Dr Aseem Malhotra's BOGUS paper in an IRRELEVANT journal (Why it’s still WRONG)" https://t.co/t6PHWzh43Z
RT @DrSusanOliver1: Dr Aseem Malhotra is at it again! This time peddling his to lies to @StevenBartlett on The Diary of a CEO who didn't c…
RT @DrSusanOliver1: Dr Aseem Malhotra is at it again! This time peddling his to lies to @StevenBartlett on The Diary of a CEO who didn't c…
RT @DrSusanOliver1: Dr Aseem Malhotra is at it again! This time peddling his to lies to @StevenBartlett on The Diary of a CEO who didn't c…
RT @DrSusanOliver1: Dr Aseem Malhotra is at it again! This time peddling his to lies to @StevenBartlett on The Diary of a CEO who didn't c…
RT @DrSusanOliver1: Dr Aseem Malhotra is at it again! This time peddling his to lies to @StevenBartlett on The Diary of a CEO who didn't c…
RT @DrSusanOliver1: Dr Aseem Malhotra is at it again! This time peddling his to lies to @StevenBartlett on The Diary of a CEO who didn't c…
@L_Helsinki @SamiAntinniemi @ITikka Tässä on paljon tietoa Robertista. https://t.co/8JJvhZYN79
@ExtropianEric @JSAscension @AndrewYang https://t.co/qvJRNjfr5h
@jimmykurl @jaredpolis @POTUS @RobertKennedyJr I think he convinced a bunch of people to not take their aids medication, and the lady he cites in the book and her baby are both ☠️ https://t.co/efVd3hTM90
@jrs_1202 @thereal_truther Kennedy is dangerous to human life. https://t.co/dGDmhzmG89
@julie4butte5 @thereal_truther @berniescoffer Krazy Kennedy. He is a massive liar. https://t.co/cP01OOSXQ2
Vaccine Papers Published, HIV Antibodies and other SARS-CoV-2 papers https://t.co/IU7KDduSE8 via @YouTube
@thevivafrei @AndrewJBates46 Since your thread tends to be an echo chamber … that lets you do the research for them, I’ll assist. https://t.co/OBQDOHyEve
A lawyer tried to debate science https://t.co/kW62aNRSDD via @YouTube
RT @Debunk_the_Funk: @MistworksPhoto https://t.co/VXfDgo1mis
RT @Debunk_the_Funk: @MistworksPhoto https://t.co/VXfDgo1mis
@MistworksPhoto https://t.co/VXfDgo1mis
@oneadds @thereal_truther Another brain-dead commenter who wouldn’t last 2 minutes in an actual conversation
RT @Debunk_the_Funk: @ModelAyshaMirza Dr. Laxton and I go over all of the relevant myocarditis data. https://t.co/C3S9LX9gP4
@ModelAyshaMirza Dr. Laxton and I go over all of the relevant myocarditis data. https://t.co/C3S9LX9gP4
@King_Geedorah_7 @Tho07336312Mark @Debunk_the_Funk @Telegraph @bmj_latest https://t.co/wnp9hsthi3
@Tho07336312Mark @Debunk_the_Funk @Telegraph @bmj_latest The logical reason why is covered in this video https://t.co/wnp9hsthi3
Viva Frei gets stuff wrong. https://t.co/Yogif9cmvd
@JusSuperman David Freiheit weaponizes lots of disinformation. If you have the attention span: A lawyer tried to debate science https://t.co/UfTDFytbJY #CdnPoli #Science #COVID19 #OttawaOccupation #Project2025 #Jan6th #SenCA #Coutts #CdnLaw
@FiscalSuspicion @HopiNg66966500 Again the video in case you missed it https://t.co/i8zTEaKQQA
@FiscalSuspicion @HopiNg66966500 As many as needed for someone my age who is not immuno-compromised..This video will explain this if you don't understand https://t.co/0wA4PMF7if
@wannabeerbad @Debunk_the_Funk @Johnincarlisle THat was clearly explained here https://t.co/RGHRCYw5SW
@_APWK_ @Debunk_the_Funk @Johnincarlisle He clearly explained why here https://t.co/vsNHaMxoa3
@thevivafrei @TuckerCarlson @JeremyDBoreing I’d caution being so pedantic Viva. You look foolish. https://t.co/eAklYOqMOY https://t.co/VNJUn4Dz9v
@NRiv23407400 @Debunk_the_Funk He clearly explained things right here https://t.co/vsNHaMxoa3
@GeorgeHuxl @CFA_Yin @dr_jon_l @doritmi @gorskon You're ignorant about the basic facts. Here you go, learn something: https://t.co/oHYMLtqbXA I know you won't watch this because you're afraid that actual science will show you're wrong and that's something your ego just couldn't handle. But others viewing this may want to learn.
@thevivafrei @ReginaWatteel Viva, you failed to reply to scientists that debunked your garbage: https://t.co/UfTDFytbJY Regina, we are eagerly awaiting you to prove your assertions on #COVID19. You can speak on Tues w/@thereal_truther, or in a @IanCopeland5 pop-up Space. #CdnPoli #PublicSafety #CdnSci https://t.co/qga4TKBRcy
@bariweiss @benkawaller If you're interested in actual science, and how RFK Jr + Rogan have twisted it, please consider watching this: https://t.co/aFMC5CCy99
As promised, here is information on COVID vaccines and myocarditis. As mentioned before, many people have already debunked this topic. IMHO, Dr Laxton has the most thorough and succinct review od literature I have found. Start at 8:40. https://t.co/eJ7SxvJJ5i
@MeisterQuirk @Allconsidered1 @Debunk_the_Funk @BretWeinstein Clearly explained https://t.co/vsNHaMxoa3
@shazrul_wan @BlackTomThePyr8 @Debunk_the_Funk https://t.co/wnp9hssJsv
@BlackTomThePyr8 @Debunk_the_Funk He already answered this weeks ago https://t.co/vsNHaMxoa3
@thevivafrei Have you responded to the scientists that completely debunked your ignorant and dangerous #COVID19 assertions? Here is the analysis: https://t.co/UfTDFytbJY c/o @Debunk_the_Funk Thanks, David. #CdnPoli #Agnotology
@gurillaapp @Debunk_the_Funk He clearly explained the booster thing in this video https://t.co/xBCklempRU
@MN__Frank @Debunk_the_Funk @SenRonJohnson Here is the answer https://t.co/vsNHaMxoa3
@thevivafrei @tribelaw @judgeluttig David, were you embarrassed when two scientists complete debunked you on COVID-19? A lawyer tried to debate science: https://t.co/UfTDFytbJY Have you apologized on your Rambo & Twatch platforms?
@drdrew https://t.co/d2bNYgsS4j
@thevivafrei I'm grateful for the scientists that revealed your dangerous ignorance & scientific illiteracy on #COVID19: A lawyer tried to debate science: https://t.co/UfTDFytbJY Have you considered an occupation that doesn't harm people? #CdnPoli #CdnSci #Genderphobia #SenCA #CdnLaw
@unlearn16tweet @thevivafrei That’s good news. Our science discussion rooms had very different experiences regarding vaccine safety & David. I am grateful for the scientists that took the time to formally debunk David’s dangerous disinformation. https://t.co/cLxafKRhIP
@hellracerXIII @thevivafrei @IanCopeland5 https://t.co/i8zTEaKQQA
@IamwhatIam_now @MrBlueEyes01 @Die_Gruenen Wir reden über diese Studie, oder? Wo in der Studie steht das? Ich habe das nicht gefunden. Im Gegenteil, sie geben ja sogar Werte für die Wirksamkeit an: "BNT162b2 was 95% effective in preventing Covid-19 (95% credible interval, 90.3 to 97.6)." https://t.co/WE1aLGWNKB
@littlebirdyEnza @Debunk_the_Funk https://t.co/gvFMNgTIzR
@thevivafrei Asking pseudoscientists 4 science really pops their easy-baked muffins. You were scientifically defenestrated on #COVID19 like a RuZZian journalist reporting Presidential candidates. Smooth-brained loser!
Asking pseudoscientists 4 science really pops their easy-baked muffins. @thevivafrei was scientifically defenestrated on #COVID19 like a RuZZian journalist reporting microchip supply delays.
@vitomendy3 @Debunk_the_Funk That is covered right here https://t.co/cgVMxxeSuz
@Faceles007 @Debunk_the_Funk You seemed to have left this out this part of the conversation https://t.co/vsNHaMxoa3
Viva still has yet to respond to scientific analysis of his #COVID19 disinformation & pseudoscience. Full analysis: https://t.co/UfTDFytbJY Does Viva's scientific illiteracy also impede his cognition of #Gender science? #CdnPoli #NoSpaceForHate #Agnotology #2SLGBTQIA+ #CdnLaw https://t.co/4Qx8xe52De
@thevivafrei Check out this break-down of Viva's #COVID19 scientific illiteracy by scientists: https://t.co/UfTDFytbJY Is Viva's failure to understand dangerous? #Disinformation #Science #CdnPoli #AbLeg #CdnSci #STEM #Biology #CdnPSE #SenCA #CdnMediaFailed #PostTruth #Agnotology
@thevivafrei @TuckerCarlson @POTUS You are such a loser, have you seen your 45 minute debunking by scientists? You’re a pathetic grifter. Ignorant dummy. https://t.co/XXrX3XPqMF #COVID19 #Griftonomics #CdnPoli #MTLPoli #PPC
@thevivafrei Biden gets science, David Freiheit. You don’t, you’re ignorant, loser. Here’s the proof, dummy: https://t.co/IfSs353MT0 #COVID19 #BidenHarris2024 #Science
Has @thevivafrei responded to being debunked on #COVID19 vaccines by @Debunk_the_Funk? His loser brother, @lionadvocacy, has not. Watch scientists do what #CdnMedia could never accomplish: https://t.co/UfTDFytbJY #Science #CdnPoli #PostTruth #NBPoli #BringTheFacts #SenCA
@johnc_231 @dr_jon_l @DowdEdward @thereal_truther @DHShades @IanCopeland5 @sjs856 The 4 shots were clearly explained, why would he get a shot meant for 60-year-olds at this point. https://t.co/cgVMxxeSuz
@MurfittTauranga Kind of like you don't understand medicine but still make money and get attention from the vulnerable and the naive https://t.co/y6HZ98EGVx
@wannabeerbad @Debunk_the_Funk That was clearly explained in this video https://t.co/i8zTEaKQQA
RT @Debunk_the_Funk: Youtube link: https://t.co/UCdGGMrmdd
@oldSkool_1 @Crater114 @CKellyUAP With Covid listed as the immediate, or underlying contributing, cause of death as listed on the death certificate. This "from or with" trope exists only in the antivax crankosphere, as a doctor explains here: I suggest you watch and learn something. https://t.co/ZpF9C8mQUp
A lawyer tried to debate science https://t.co/SDegg15Gcb via @YouTube
@Tacoslover187 @detourdumonde Voici une vidéo (en anglais) qui reprend les données issues de meta-analyses sur le risque de myocardites
@wannabeerbad @GetSchwifyinere @Debunk_the_Funk @_APWK_ That was addressed in this video https://t.co/vsNHaMxoa3
RT @InaVW: @TheGManPrime @DNArigged I'll just drop this here for anyone still believing things coming out of that guy's mouth just because…
RT @Debunk_the_Funk: Youtube link: https://t.co/UCdGGMrmdd
@TheGManPrime @DNArigged I'll just drop this here for anyone still believing things coming out of that guy's mouth just because he's a lawyer: https://t.co/NdMIOFjTFB
When an anti vaxxer is shown to be breathtakingly out of his depth and it’s good enough for curious laypeople with a basic understanding of virus science to comprehend. Thankyou Dr Dan Wilson. Again. https://t.co/tlK1E0TcOS
@Vex042 @P_McCulloughMD @DrAseemMalhotra @joerogan @BretWeinstein Listen, im gonna go to sleep because this isnt going anywhere. watch these two videos and ill get back to you tomorrow https://t.co/UfGdx0absJ https://t.co/22mvQ1elN6
@Vex042 @P_McCulloughMD @DrAseemMalhotra @joerogan @BretWeinstein wrong. bro just watch this video for the love of God. https://t.co/22mvQ1elN6
@Vex042 @P_McCulloughMD @DrAseemMalhotra @joerogan @BretWeinstein watch this video. They clear up a bunch of talking points used by the Joe rogans of the world, or the Bret Weinstein's etc. https://t.co/22mvQ1eTCE
How much of a dishonest grifter is @thevivafrei ? Feast your brains on a thorough takedown. https://t.co/Pep0BrtCVH
RT @BurgerLab12: @thevivafrei @thereal_truther Great breakdown https://t.co/7dEhUZPci6
@thevivafrei @thereal_truther Great breakdown https://t.co/7dEhUZPci6
@thevivafrei You were scientifically debunked after your babble over #COVID19 https://t.co/UfTDFytbJY Are you qualified for your opinions?
@thevivafrei Did you respond to your #COVID19 debunking yet?
@RealAlexJones @elonmusk https://t.co/poYp39LLvP
@Food4ears In een deel van deze video een uitstekende uitleg over myocarditis. Een lange, edoch zeer leerzame zit: https://t.co/USGsTVOjfD
Thread: So its been yrs since Ive encountered @imixwhatilike Jared Ball who's made a career out of Black Liberation & all things Afro American etc. Then I stumbled upon him retweeting this drivel in defense of the Covid Fascist Terror, Torture and Murder: https://t.co/C34S5bhscJ
RT @tweettersux: https://t.co/D4xjjrB23R @Debunk_the_Funk and @dr_jon_l Really should come up with a line of merch. Coffee cups and fuzz…
RT @Debunk_the_Funk: Youtube link: https://t.co/UCdGGMrmdd
RT @Debunk_the_Funk: Youtube link: https://t.co/UCdGGMrmdd
RT @Debunk_the_Funk: Youtube link: https://t.co/UCdGGMrmdd
https://t.co/D4xjjrB23R @Debunk_the_Funk and @dr_jon_l Really should come up with a line of merch. Coffee cups and fuzzy things that can be thrown at antivaxxer relatives. Great video.
https://t.co/PbssbwDkVo
RT @Debunk_the_Funk: Youtube link: https://t.co/UCdGGMrmdd
@dpakman https://t.co/dk2nARKorz
RT @GkmOfficial: What an excellent, must watch, video by @dr_jon_l & @Debunk_the_Funk. I especially appreciate how they dispelled the myth…
RT @Debunk_the_Funk: Youtube link: https://t.co/UCdGGMrmdd
@mtgreenee here is some information that should make you feel stupid. Lmao, what the hell am I saying. You have reflection skills. https://t.co/dQulHb6bCf
RT @Debunk_the_Funk: Youtube link: https://t.co/UCdGGMrmdd
RT @Debunk_the_Funk: Youtube link: https://t.co/UCdGGMrmdd
RT @Debunk_the_Funk: Youtube link: https://t.co/UCdGGMrmdd
RT @Debunk_the_Funk: Youtube link: https://t.co/UCdGGMrmdd
RT @dr_jon_l: @thevivafrei @thereal_truther You seem obsessed Viva - full damage control mode? https://t.co/NVXrKIJY9D
What good science shows. A very good watch. https://t.co/Js7juFhhlq
RT @Debunk_the_Funk: Youtube link: https://t.co/UCdGGMrmdd
RT @Debunk_the_Funk: Youtube link: https://t.co/UCdGGMrmdd
RT @dr_jon_l: @thevivafrei @thereal_truther You seem obsessed Viva - full damage control mode? https://t.co/NVXrKIJY9D
RT @dr_jon_l: @thevivafrei @thereal_truther You seem obsessed Viva - full damage control mode? https://t.co/NVXrKIJY9D
RT @Debunk_the_Funk: Youtube link: https://t.co/UCdGGMrmdd
@TheGammon3 @Yowzah7729 @Jamesnotabot @DrSusanOliver1 https://t.co/eycZx2qXMq You need to watch this.
RT @dr_jon_l: @thevivafrei @thereal_truther You seem obsessed Viva - full damage control mode? https://t.co/NVXrKIJY9D
RT @Debunk_the_Funk: Youtube link: https://t.co/UCdGGMrmdd
RT @dr_jon_l: @thevivafrei @thereal_truther You seem obsessed Viva - full damage control mode? https://t.co/NVXrKIJY9D
RT @Debunk_the_Funk: Youtube link: https://t.co/UCdGGMrmdd
RT @Debunk_the_Funk: Youtube link: https://t.co/UCdGGMrmdd
Ist ja auch erst seit > 31.12.2020 < bekannt. „Safety and Efficacy of the BNT162b2 mRNA Covid-19 Vaccine“
@Spartan83578356 @lonnibesancon Décembre 2020. De rien. https://t.co/GTShkeAbM5 https://t.co/0SuCBHBCb6
@AlexandNoWait Ah you didn't read it did you? Ah you didn't read CDC! Ah you have no science background. Ah you are spreading misinformation. https://t.co/ywKhF7Nqr9
RFK2 is killing people with disinformation. I suspect Joe Rogan is innocent in this regard, being unusually credulous. Dr. Oliver debunks the whole "bollocks". https://t.co/RHvgQx0RI6
RT @LockedFab: Comment peut-on mentir à ce point face à un monsieur à l'anglais approximatif qui hoche de la tête ? 43 448 participants, c…
RT @LockedFab: Comment peut-on mentir à ce point face à un monsieur à l'anglais approximatif qui hoche de la tête ? 43 448 participants, c…
RT @LockedFab: Comment peut-on mentir à ce point face à un monsieur à l'anglais approximatif qui hoche de la tête ? 43 448 participants, c…
RT @LockedFab: Comment peut-on mentir à ce point face à un monsieur à l'anglais approximatif qui hoche de la tête ? 43 448 participants, c…
RT @LockedFab: Comment peut-on mentir à ce point face à un monsieur à l'anglais approximatif qui hoche de la tête ? 43 448 participants, c…
RT @LockedFab: Comment peut-on mentir à ce point face à un monsieur à l'anglais approximatif qui hoche de la tête ? 43 448 participants, c…
RT @LockedFab: Comment peut-on mentir à ce point face à un monsieur à l'anglais approximatif qui hoche de la tête ? 43 448 participants, c…
RT @LockedFab: Comment peut-on mentir à ce point face à un monsieur à l'anglais approximatif qui hoche de la tête ? 43 448 participants, c…
RT @LockedFab: Comment peut-on mentir à ce point face à un monsieur à l'anglais approximatif qui hoche de la tête ? 43 448 participants, c…
RT @LockedFab: Comment peut-on mentir à ce point face à un monsieur à l'anglais approximatif qui hoche de la tête ? 43 448 participants, c…
RT @LockedFab: Comment peut-on mentir à ce point face à un monsieur à l'anglais approximatif qui hoche de la tête ? 43 448 participants, c…
Comment peut-on mentir à ce point face à un monsieur à l'anglais approximatif qui hoche de la tête ? 43 448 participants, c'est un essai de grande envergure. https://t.co/GTShkeAJBD https://t.co/8sklRvl1RT
@genericeddie @Intrinsic29 And another one: https://t.co/7NMsIatKpr
RT @DrSusanOliver1: In his Joe Rogan interview, John F. Kennedy Jr combined half-truths with lies to make his nonsense sound more creditabl…
@Rain_lucky1 @beverleyturner @RobertKennedyJr If it upsets you, I won't say it. However, he has claimed, for example, that it's deliberate that covid is less dangerous to Jews. This is bollox. I call it what it is. Anyway, here's a scientist showing how wrong he is. Why is she wrong if you think so? https://t.co/yiOyN09fnH
@Team_RFKJnr https://t.co/jfOKYDt4d8
@mongank https://t.co/jfOKYDt4d8
@NFTPROJECT_10 @PebusPebus @oviosu @joerogan @RobertKennedyJr https://t.co/jfOKYDt4d8
@TheRightMelissa @joerogan @RobertKennedyJr https://t.co/jfOKYDt4d8
@DJC20201 @joerogan @RobertKennedyJr https://t.co/jfOKYDt4d8
@PebusPebus @NaijaFlyingDr https://t.co/jfOKYDt4d8
@NeilBoltonRSPL @mcuban https://t.co/jfOKYDt4d8
@msmstarr @CzarlinskiGreg @9NewsAUS @joerogan @RobertKennedyJr https://t.co/jfOKYDt4d8
@AniaMouse https://t.co/jfOKYDt4d8
@kevinpbreslin https://t.co/jfOKYDt4d8
@Kst96123739 @annamac987 @caz_sampson @DrAseemMalhotra https://t.co/jfOKYDt4d8
@JED222222 @CannabisHelps @RobertKennedyJr @joerogan https://t.co/jfOKYDt4d8
@MythinformedMKE https://t.co/jfOKYDt4d8
RT @DrSusanOliver1: In his Joe Rogan interview, John F. Kennedy Jr combined half-truths with lies to make his nonsense sound more creditabl…
@JayinKyiv @Marialinden301 RFK is an idiot https://t.co/BgzWO7iopL
@judorn1 @SpartaJustice https://t.co/BgzWO7iopL
@SurfCharlesNot @PiersUncensored @RobertKennedyJr @piersmorgan @TalkTV https://t.co/6DniBxQY65 https://t.co/kD78xH3WwF
RT @DrSusanOliver1: In his Joe Rogan interview, John F. Kennedy Jr combined half-truths with lies to make his nonsense sound more creditabl…
@CastorT26371809 @jonathanstea @derekberes @matthewremski @JulianMWalker https://t.co/XuzU6Jg5WL
Sure, here you go: https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/nejmoa2034577 And here's some handy actual video of them lying: https://twitter.com/TheMilkBarTV/status/1550647428809781251?s=20 Bonus grifter scientist doctor video: https://twitter.com/mazemoore/status/1670627999656411136?s=20
RT @DrSusanOliver1: In his Joe Rogan interview, John F. Kennedy Jr combined half-truths with lies to make his nonsense sound more creditabl…
RT @DrSusanOliver1: In his Joe Rogan interview, John F. Kennedy Jr combined half-truths with lies to make his nonsense sound more creditabl…
RT @DrSusanOliver1: In his Joe Rogan interview, John F. Kennedy Jr combined half-truths with lies to make his nonsense sound more creditabl…
Antivaxers, I thought placebos weren't used in SARS-CoV-2 mRNA trials, or any other vaccine trials? So how do you explain the below study, where ~18,000 people received a placebo and ~18,000 people received the actual vaccine? Care to explain? https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/nejmoa2034577
@jamesflynn_2 @willobri @eoghan @RobertKennedyJr Worth watching how Kennedy does a firehose of absolute bull on Rogan (and Rogan falls for it), Susan does a fine job here https://t.co/Okf4P8flx5
@dothadew333 @gadfly @Cheezuz_ @thereal_truther @ENirenberg @Debunk_the_Funk h/t @DrSusanOliver1 https://t.co/Wd8tY104VM
@COMO516 @EWoodhouse7 @LadyDoctorSays Here are a few responses to Bobby's nonsense https://t.co/I4bYypYfV0 https://t.co/lhdgPLfUwh
@OlgaReinholdt he didnt provide a source for his claim. But Dr Susan Oliver found the source https://t.co/I4bYypYfV0
4/4 And I use the term "lying" because he intentionally mixes truth with untruth in an attempt to persuade - it's deception. https://t.co/7NMsIatKpr
RT @DrSusanOliver1: In his Joe Rogan interview, John F. Kennedy Jr combined half-truths with lies to make his nonsense sound more creditabl…
@TuckerCarlson https://t.co/PTw5zosAwB
RFKj shredded by Back To The Science. https://t.co/R9Sw0CFFHM
@TheLogicLlama @lexfridman @aaronkemmer @RobertKennedyJr Here are two experts: https://t.co/7NMsIatKpr https://t.co/TAXmAvbWPr
RT @DrSusanOliver1: In his Joe Rogan interview, John F. Kennedy Jr combined half-truths with lies to make his nonsense sound more creditabl…
RT @DrSusanOliver1: In his Joe Rogan interview, John F. Kennedy Jr combined half-truths with lies to make his nonsense sound more creditabl…
RT @DrSusanOliver1: In his Joe Rogan interview, John F. Kennedy Jr combined half-truths with lies to make his nonsense sound more creditabl…
RT @DrSusanOliver1: In his Joe Rogan interview, John F. Kennedy Jr combined half-truths with lies to make his nonsense sound more creditabl…
@billmaher Gee, I don't know. Whaddya think? https://t.co/XecyS1v9kQ
RT @DrSusanOliver1: In his Joe Rogan interview, John F. Kennedy Jr combined half-truths with lies to make his nonsense sound more creditabl…
RT @DrSusanOliver1: In his Joe Rogan interview, John F. Kennedy Jr combined half-truths with lies to make his nonsense sound more creditabl…
@TrickleUpSystem Just going to leave these here for those who don't support lying to a deadly degree. Not for you of course, because you clearly don't care. https://t.co/kO0T3xa7Gf https://t.co/bCE9Qbf0zv https://t.co/XTkog1lWfv
RT @scottsantens: Great video here by @DrSusanOliver1 that corrects some of the lies RFK told to Joe Rogan, but more importantly helps in u…
RT @DrSusanOliver1: In his Joe Rogan interview, John F. Kennedy Jr combined half-truths with lies to make his nonsense sound more creditabl…
@patrickbetdavid https://t.co/zQ5IkUQeBG
@drvolts too much content for @DrSusanOliver1 and @Debunk_the_Funk to debunk. both have good video responses. https://t.co/jAvhHmUu3K https://t.co/UbIvTf8Vhk
RT @DrSusanOliver1: In his Joe Rogan interview, John F. Kennedy Jr combined half-truths with lies to make his nonsense sound more creditabl…
RT @DrSusanOliver1: In his Joe Rogan interview, John F. Kennedy Jr combined half-truths with lies to make his nonsense sound more creditabl…
RT @DrSusanOliver1: In his Joe Rogan interview, John F. Kennedy Jr combined half-truths with lies to make his nonsense sound more creditabl…
RT @DrSusanOliver1: In his Joe Rogan interview, John F. Kennedy Jr combined half-truths with lies to make his nonsense sound more creditabl…
How RFK Jr made nonsense sound credible on Joe Rogan https://t.co/KuoUSucTLO Robert F Kennedy Jr recently appeared on the Joe Rogan show and sprouted a lot of nonsense about vaccines and other healthcare related matters technique that he used to make his lies appear more credible
How RFK Jr made nonsense sound credible on Joe Rogan - YouTube https://t.co/HtSo6qaKV3
RT @DrSusanOliver1: In his Joe Rogan interview, John F. Kennedy Jr combined half-truths with lies to make his nonsense sound more creditabl…
RT @DrSusanOliver1: In his Joe Rogan interview, John F. Kennedy Jr combined half-truths with lies to make his nonsense sound more creditabl…
RT @scottsantens: Great video here by @DrSusanOliver1 that corrects some of the lies RFK told to Joe Rogan, but more importantly helps in u…
RT @DrSusanOliver1: In his Joe Rogan interview, John F. Kennedy Jr combined half-truths with lies to make his nonsense sound more creditabl…
@KWestbrook0 @lexfridman @RobertKennedyJr Ethylmercury is different than methylmercury. RFK doesn't understand this or just chooses to lie about it. RFK is basically freaking out about elemental sodium despite eating salt every day. Watching this will help. Asking RFK about it won't. https://t.co/bCE9Qbf0zv
@eddiepullman75 @Nellyrasberry @ErieNotEerie @PeterHotez @VICE @annamerlan https://t.co/jfOKYDt4d8
RT @scottsantens: Great video here by @DrSusanOliver1 that corrects some of the lies RFK told to Joe Rogan, but more importantly helps in u…
@DaltonHamburger @PeterHotez @culturemap @KenCultureMap https://t.co/jfOKYDt4d8
@DougieSmyth66 @RadioFreeTom @joerogan https://t.co/jfOKYDt4d8
@P_McCulloughMD @joerogan @PeterHotez @RobertFKennedyr @c_plushie @VigilantFox https://t.co/jfOKYDt4d8
@Kanthan2030 https://t.co/jfOKYDt4d8
@lotusctr @GidMK Robert Kennedy lies about everything. EVERYTHING. Worse he puts kernels of 1/2 truths to make it sound plausible. Here is a pretty display of his utter duplicity: https://t.co/tDuvq74p51
@lexfridman @RobertKennedyJr Be interested in seeing a response to this video: https://t.co/m2S1TcT1hz
RT @DrSusanOliver1: In his Joe Rogan interview, John F. Kennedy Jr combined half-truths with lies to make his nonsense sound more creditabl…
RT @DrSusanOliver1: In his Joe Rogan interview, John F. Kennedy Jr combined half-truths with lies to make his nonsense sound more creditabl…
RT @DrSusanOliver1: In his Joe Rogan interview, John F. Kennedy Jr combined half-truths with lies to make his nonsense sound more creditabl…
RT @DrSusanOliver1: In his Joe Rogan interview, John F. Kennedy Jr combined half-truths with lies to make his nonsense sound more creditabl…
RT @DrSusanOliver1: In his Joe Rogan interview, John F. Kennedy Jr combined half-truths with lies to make his nonsense sound more creditabl…
How RFK Jr made nonsense sound credible on Joe Rogan https://t.co/ubq5F77hru via @YouTube
RT @DrSusanOliver1: In his Joe Rogan interview, John F. Kennedy Jr combined half-truths with lies to make his nonsense sound more creditabl…
RT @DrSusanOliver1: In his Joe Rogan interview, John F. Kennedy Jr combined half-truths with lies to make his nonsense sound more creditabl…
RT @scottsantens: Great video here by @DrSusanOliver1 that corrects some of the lies RFK told to Joe Rogan, but more importantly helps in u…
RT @scottsantens: Great video here by @DrSusanOliver1 that corrects some of the lies RFK told to Joe Rogan, but more importantly helps in u…
RT @scottsantens: Great video here by @DrSusanOliver1 that corrects some of the lies RFK told to Joe Rogan, but more importantly helps in u…
RT @scottsantens: Great video here by @DrSusanOliver1 that corrects some of the lies RFK told to Joe Rogan, but more importantly helps in u…
RT @DrSusanOliver1: In his Joe Rogan interview, John F. Kennedy Jr combined half-truths with lies to make his nonsense sound more creditabl…
RT @DrSusanOliver1: In his Joe Rogan interview, John F. Kennedy Jr combined half-truths with lies to make his nonsense sound more creditabl…
RT @DrSusanOliver1: In his Joe Rogan interview, John F. Kennedy Jr combined half-truths with lies to make his nonsense sound more creditabl…
RT @DrSusanOliver1: In his Joe Rogan interview, John F. Kennedy Jr combined half-truths with lies to make his nonsense sound more creditabl…
RT @scottsantens: Great video here by @DrSusanOliver1 that corrects some of the lies RFK told to Joe Rogan, but more importantly helps in u…
@t_mooon_ 完全にデマ。 通常、医薬品は第3相試験の結果で承認されます。 本ワクチンは第3相をprimary期間、通称「第4相」(市販後調査)をsecodary期間として登録していて、primary期間が終了してから承認されています。 第3相試験の結果も2020年12月10日に公開されています。 https://t.co/wUupZq1ieM
RT @BR24: Zur Corona-#Impfung verbreiten sich viele Gerüchte. Zum Beispiel: Kann die Impfung #unfruchtbar machen, die #DNA verändern oder t…
RT @BR24: Zur Corona-#Impfung verbreiten sich viele Gerüchte. Zum Beispiel: Kann die Impfung #unfruchtbar machen, die #DNA verändern oder t…
RT @InternewsTz: Tafiti zinasemaje kuhusu watu waliochanja na ambao hawajanja dhidi ya maambukizi ya COVID-19? Daktari @ndosie na Daktari…
RT @InternewsTz: Tafiti zinasemaje kuhusu watu waliochanja na ambao hawajanja dhidi ya maambukizi ya COVID-19? Daktari @ndosie na Daktari…
Tafiti zinasemaje kuhusu watu waliochanja na ambao hawajanja dhidi ya maambukizi ya COVID-19? Daktari @ndosie na Daktari @NdemaHabib wanajadili hili kupitia link ifuatayo: https://t.co/M09xzMT4tR
RT @ndosie: Tumejadili utafiti wa kipekee kuhusu maambukizi ya virusi vya korona kati ya watu waliopata #chanjo za #UVIKO19 na wasiochanjwa…
RT @ndosie: Tumejadili utafiti wa kipekee kuhusu maambukizi ya virusi vya korona kati ya watu waliopata #chanjo za #UVIKO19 na wasiochanjwa…
RT @ndosie: Tumejadili utafiti wa kipekee kuhusu maambukizi ya virusi vya korona kati ya watu waliopata #chanjo za #UVIKO19 na wasiochanjwa…
RT @ndosie: Tumejadili utafiti wa kipekee kuhusu maambukizi ya virusi vya korona kati ya watu waliopata #chanjo za #UVIKO19 na wasiochanjwa…
RT @ndosie: Tumejadili utafiti wa kipekee kuhusu maambukizi ya virusi vya korona kati ya watu waliopata #chanjo za #UVIKO19 na wasiochanjwa…
RT @ndosie: Tumejadili utafiti wa kipekee kuhusu maambukizi ya virusi vya korona kati ya watu waliopata #chanjo za #UVIKO19 na wasiochanjwa…
RT @ndosie: Tumejadili utafiti wa kipekee kuhusu maambukizi ya virusi vya korona kati ya watu waliopata #chanjo za #UVIKO19 na wasiochanjwa…
RT @ndosie: Tumejadili utafiti wa kipekee kuhusu maambukizi ya virusi vya korona kati ya watu waliopata #chanjo za #UVIKO19 na wasiochanjwa…
RT @ndosie: Tumejadili utafiti wa kipekee kuhusu maambukizi ya virusi vya korona kati ya watu waliopata #chanjo za #UVIKO19 na wasiochanjwa…
RT @ndosie: Tumejadili utafiti wa kipekee kuhusu maambukizi ya virusi vya korona kati ya watu waliopata #chanjo za #UVIKO19 na wasiochanjwa…
Tumejadili utafiti wa kipekee kuhusu maambukizi ya virusi vya korona kati ya watu waliopata #chanjo za #UVIKO19 na wasiochanjwa.
RT @CHUBordeaux: [#VIDEO #COVID19 ] Professionnels de #santé, vous vous posez des questions sur le #vaccin ? Avec la vidéo #prevention de #…
https://t.co/ukrnueUHrR si ça peut aider certains a réfléchir …
Tout est clair : faites vous vacciner... https://t.co/geYDJBgT64
RT @E_BotelhoNevers: Vous êtes soignants? l’obligation vaccinale et les vaccins Covid-19 vous posent question ou problème? N’hésitez pas à…
COVID-19 : L'obligation vaccinale des soignants https://t.co/sb4ZedlbQ7 via @YouTube
RT @E_BotelhoNevers: Vous êtes soignants? l’obligation vaccinale et les vaccins Covid-19 vous posent question ou problème? N’hésitez pas à…
RT @E_BotelhoNevers: Vous êtes soignants? l’obligation vaccinale et les vaccins Covid-19 vous posent question ou problème? N’hésitez pas à…
RT @E_BotelhoNevers: Vous êtes soignants? l’obligation vaccinale et les vaccins Covid-19 vous posent question ou problème? N’hésitez pas à…
RT @E_BotelhoNevers: Vous êtes soignants? l’obligation vaccinale et les vaccins Covid-19 vous posent question ou problème? N’hésitez pas à…
RT @E_BotelhoNevers: Vous êtes soignants? l’obligation vaccinale et les vaccins Covid-19 vous posent question ou problème? N’hésitez pas à…
RT @E_BotelhoNevers: Vous êtes soignants? l’obligation vaccinale et les vaccins Covid-19 vous posent question ou problème? N’hésitez pas à…
RT @E_BotelhoNevers: Vous êtes soignants? l’obligation vaccinale et les vaccins Covid-19 vous posent question ou problème? N’hésitez pas à…
RT @E_BotelhoNevers: Vous êtes soignants? l’obligation vaccinale et les vaccins Covid-19 vous posent question ou problème? N’hésitez pas à…
RT @E_BotelhoNevers: Vous êtes soignants? l’obligation vaccinale et les vaccins Covid-19 vous posent question ou problème? N’hésitez pas à…
RT @E_BotelhoNevers: Vous êtes soignants? l’obligation vaccinale et les vaccins Covid-19 vous posent question ou problème? N’hésitez pas à…
Vous êtes soignants? l’obligation vaccinale et les vaccins Covid-19 vous posent question ou problème? N’hésitez pas à regarder cette vidéo de #prevenstuff. Prenez votre décision en ayant en main les données basées sur les faits. https://t.co/YQuCJOvoKc
@MarcellineDuha1 1. Informez vous de manière fiable https://t.co/PWQXlvptIY 2. Dépassez vos peurs et vos doutes 3. Faites vous vacciner (c'est la seule option logique) 4. Reprenez votre métier 5. Votez pour qui bon vous semble en 2022
Vidéo parfaite https://t.co/ASULndEoAi
COVID-19 : L'obligation vaccinale des soignants https://t.co/wkeKKk0yOh via @YouTube
@Michelle34250 @VLautard Je vous invite à regarder cette vidéo : https://t.co/jBT3aZAk3i
@L_Infirmier_0ff @LcrStefany https://t.co/SUkNzPcIRE
@lolilapopa Intérêt +++ de diffuser la vidéo suivante didactique et sourcée aux personnes qui doutent de bonne foi. https://t.co/PWQXlvptIY
RT @CHUBordeaux: [#VIDEO #COVID19 ] Professionnels de #santé, vous vous posez des questions sur le #vaccin ? Avec la vidéo #prevention de #…
RT @CHUBordeaux: [#VIDEO #COVID19 ] Professionnels de #santé, vous vous posez des questions sur le #vaccin ? Avec la vidéo #prevention de #…
RT @CHUBordeaux: [#VIDEO #COVID19 ] Professionnels de #santé, vous vous posez des questions sur le #vaccin ? Avec la vidéo #prevention de #…
[#VIDEO #COVID19 ] Professionnels de #santé, vous vous posez des questions sur le #vaccin ? Avec la vidéo #prevention de #Prévenstuff, des réponses à vos questions https://t.co/fZwy6jFMvd
RT @MinkaOceane_Dr: Pour stopper la désinformation, je vous partage cette magnifique vidéo sur "l'obligation vaccinale des soignants." Vidé…
@RemiSalomon @DreSetton Leur montrer cette très bonne vidéo faite par des collègues médecins du travail https://t.co/PWQXlvptIY
Pour stopper la désinformation, je vous partage cette magnifique vidéo sur "l'obligation vaccinale des soignants." Vidéo réalisée par mon excellent confrère le Dr #ThierryBONJOUR à qui je dis #BRAVO et #MERCI ⤵️ https://t.co/heuaKE2Wmr
RT @AlexSamTG: COVID-19 : L'obligation vaccinale des soignants https://t.co/AEsFs1MqsG via @YouTube
RT @AlexSamTG: COVID-19 : L'obligation vaccinale des soignants https://t.co/AEsFs1MqsG via @YouTube
RT @Cidoi37_41: Le 15 septembre l’obligation vaccinale pour les professionnels de santé commencera. Pour celles et ceux qui doutent encore…
RT @AlexSamTG: COVID-19 : L'obligation vaccinale des soignants https://t.co/AEsFs1MqsG via @YouTube
RT @AlexSamTG: COVID-19 : L'obligation vaccinale des soignants https://t.co/AEsFs1MqsG via @YouTube
RT @AlexSamTG: COVID-19 : L'obligation vaccinale des soignants https://t.co/AEsFs1MqsG via @YouTube
RT @AlexSamTG: COVID-19 : L'obligation vaccinale des soignants https://t.co/AEsFs1MqsG via @YouTube
RT @AlexSamTG: COVID-19 : L'obligation vaccinale des soignants https://t.co/AEsFs1MqsG via @YouTube
RT @AlexSamTG: COVID-19 : L'obligation vaccinale des soignants https://t.co/AEsFs1MqsG via @YouTube
COVID-19 : L'obligation vaccinale des soignants https://t.co/AEsFs1MqsG via @YouTube
RT @ZeNicoLs: Pour les gens (et surtout les soignants) qui doutent regardez cette très bonne vidéo d'info : https://t.co/PWQXlvptIY
Pour les gens (et surtout les soignants) qui doutent regardez cette très bonne vidéo d'info : https://t.co/PWQXlvptIY https://t.co/yu2sA1TIi1
RT @fambrosino13: Une vidéo très bien faite simple et didactique, qui explique parfaitement bien l'intérêt de la vaccination et démonte les…
Une vidéo très bien faite simple et didactique, qui explique parfaitement bien l'intérêt de la vaccination et démonte les doutes. A regarder et partager ! https://t.co/srvLrSnOzl
RT @Cidoi37_41: Le 15 septembre l’obligation vaccinale pour les professionnels de santé commencera. Pour celles et ceux qui doutent encore…
RT @Cidoi37_41: Le 15 septembre l’obligation vaccinale pour les professionnels de santé commencera. Pour celles et ceux qui doutent encore…
RT @Cidoi37_41: Le 15 septembre l’obligation vaccinale pour les professionnels de santé commencera. Pour celles et ceux qui doutent encore…
RT @Cidoi37_41: Le 15 septembre l’obligation vaccinale pour les professionnels de santé commencera. Pour celles et ceux qui doutent encore…
RT @Cidoi37_41: Le 15 septembre l’obligation vaccinale pour les professionnels de santé commencera. Pour celles et ceux qui doutent encore…
RT @Cidoi37_41: Le 15 septembre l’obligation vaccinale pour les professionnels de santé commencera. Pour celles et ceux qui doutent encore…
RT @Cidoi37_41: Le 15 septembre l’obligation vaccinale pour les professionnels de santé commencera. Pour celles et ceux qui doutent encore…
RT @Cidoi37_41: Le 15 septembre l’obligation vaccinale pour les professionnels de santé commencera. Pour celles et ceux qui doutent encore…
RT @Cidoi37_41: Le 15 septembre l’obligation vaccinale pour les professionnels de santé commencera. Pour celles et ceux qui doutent encore…
Le 15 septembre l’obligation vaccinale pour les professionnels de santé commencera. Pour celles et ceux qui doutent encore, s’il vous plaît prenez 10min pour regarder cette vidéo : https://t.co/yqKDLYWjhx S’il reste des questions, contactez nous, nous vous accompagnerons. https://t.co/rNdT1oiGxc
RT @BoyteJM: @JeanBottari
RT @ARS_NAquit: #COVID19 | Vous êtes professionnel.le de santé ? L’obligation vaccinale vous questionne
https://t.co/jJIMjUuL3D
RT @CHUNimes: Obligation vaccinale : Efficacité du vaccin, recherche médicale, recul sur les effets secondaires, obligation vaccinale, le D…
@JeanBottari
RT @ARS_NAquit: #COVID19 | Vous êtes professionnel.le de santé ? L’obligation vaccinale vous questionne
“COVID-19 : L'obligation vaccinale des soignants” et de tout les autres ? https://t.co/msZluccqYw Et on répond quoi à cela
@api37 “COVID-19 : L'obligation vaccinale des soignants” et de tout les autres ? https://t.co/msZluccqYw https://t.co/IwNgkpNhgC
RT @CHUNimes: Obligation vaccinale : Efficacité du vaccin, recherche médicale, recul sur les effets secondaires, obligation vaccinale, le D…
@Mohsa491 @UPR_Asselineau @DavidPujadas @EricBillyFR https://t.co/CzmJOCFSUc
RT @CTrivalle: Une vidéo pour rassurer les soignants sur l’obligation vaccinale https://t.co/9ydvMGEbRN
RT @ARS_NAquit: #COVID19 | Vous êtes professionnel.le de santé ? L’obligation vaccinale vous questionne
RT @ARS_NAquit: #COVID19 | Vous êtes professionnel.le de santé ? L’obligation vaccinale vous questionne
#COVID19 | Vous êtes professionnel.le de santé ? L’obligation vaccinale vous questionne
https://t.co/2m28QtsB1d ".... Par ailleurs, pour vous aider encore dans la communication avec les professionnels non vaccinés..." Je viens de recevoir un mail de ma direction car je refuse l'injection. @DIVIZIO1 @BoutryRichard @cab2626
Professionnels de santé, soignants, femmes enceintes, la vaccination #COVID19 vous questionne ? C'est bien légitime. On vous propose d'y voir plus clair avec cette vidéo très complète réalisée par Prévenstuff. #vaccination #information https://t.co/ZbuzhuOkWr
Obligation vaccinale : Efficacité du vaccin, recherche médicale, recul sur les effets secondaires, obligation vaccinale, le Dr Bonjour vous dit tout ce que vous devriez savoir pour vous faire un avis éclairé et documenté. https://t.co/gncl9VFPyl
COVID-19 : L'obligation vaccinale des soignants https://t.co/D9WU7qd8XR via @YouTube
RT @CTrivalle: Une vidéo pour rassurer les soignants sur l’obligation vaccinale https://t.co/9ydvMGEbRN
RT @CTrivalle: Une vidéo pour rassurer les soignants sur l’obligation vaccinale https://t.co/9ydvMGEbRN
Une vidéo pour rassurer les soignants sur l’obligation vaccinale https://t.co/9ydvMGEbRN
@f_philippot En effet, face au variant Delta, son efficacité a diminué. https://t.co/ebjm129jUw
Pédagogique ! #Covid et #Vaccin https://t.co/AMoQw1q6bn
COVID-19 : L'obligation vaccinale des soignants et leur hésitation https://t.co/nwW2YIMGt3 via @YouTube
Explication sur l'obligation vaccinale des soignants. https://t.co/9mTz6kt9WH
RT @FabriceReaCHU: Une vidéo à consommer sans modération destinée aux soignants inquiets vis à vis de la #VaccinObligatoire contre la #COVI…
La meilleure mise au point autour de la pertinence du vaccin contre le virus, à regarder et à diffuser. Bien évidemment il ne sera pas possible de convaincre les complotistes les plus encroutés pour lesquels le rationnel et les faits ne portent pas. https://t.co/A9BjpbtPp5
Une vidéo à consommer sans modération destinée aux soignants inquiets vis à vis de la #VaccinObligatoire contre la #COVID19
Merci a notre confrère pour cette vidéo https://t.co/5bDp1n72BL. #VaccinezVous
Gente, olhem o video que meu lab fez sobre as vacinas do covid19!! Informação de verdade
Qual é a melhor vacina para COVID-19? https://t.co/wkMOcbulE8 via @YouTube
One vaccine dose and two viral variants https://t.co/o1f9hT6V6T via Dr. John Campbell
https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMoa2034577
RT @BR24: Nein, die Corona-Impfung macht nicht unfruchtbar - und verändert auch nicht die #DNA. Aber: Sie kann in Ausnahmefällen zu allergi…
RT @BR24: Nein, die Corona-Impfung macht nicht unfruchtbar - und verändert auch nicht die #DNA. Aber: Sie kann in Ausnahmefällen zu allergi…
RT @BR24: Nein, die Corona-Impfung macht nicht unfruchtbar - und verändert auch nicht die #DNA. Aber: Sie kann in Ausnahmefällen zu allergi…
Nein, die Corona-Impfung macht nicht unfruchtbar - und verändert auch nicht die #DNA. Aber: Sie kann in Ausnahmefällen zu allergischen Schocks führen. Drei häufige Behauptungen rund um die #Impfung im Check des @faktenfuchs
RT @BR24: Zur Corona-#Impfung verbreiten sich viele Gerüchte. Zum Beispiel: Kann die Impfung #unfruchtbar machen, die #DNA verändern oder t…
RT @BR24: Zur Corona-#Impfung verbreiten sich viele Gerüchte. Zum Beispiel: Kann die Impfung #unfruchtbar machen, die #DNA verändern oder t…
RT @BR24: Zur Corona-#Impfung verbreiten sich viele Gerüchte. Zum Beispiel: Kann die Impfung #unfruchtbar machen, die #DNA verändern oder t…
RT @BR24: Zur Corona-#Impfung verbreiten sich viele Gerüchte. Zum Beispiel: Kann die Impfung #unfruchtbar machen, die #DNA verändern oder t…
Zur Corona-#Impfung verbreiten sich viele Gerüchte. Zum Beispiel: Kann die Impfung #unfruchtbar machen, die #DNA verändern oder tödliche allergische Schocks auslösen? Das checkt der @faktenfuchs
Safety and Efficacy of the BNT162b2 mRNA Covid-19 Vaccine | NEJM
Il Vaccino e il #Covid, anzi i #Vaccini e la "pubblicità-progresso" che gli stanno a fare. Vaccini non sperimentati nel tempo, "vaccini" mRNA, che sta "sperimentando a proprie spese" chi sé li fa. Mentre è SILENZIO sulle cure praticabili e sui farmaci. https://t.co/dCN43VmkeX https://t.co/fqdT1FA85J
https://t.co/IWRRTDYck6 #informazionivaccinicovid19 #vaccini
VACCINI ANTI-COVID
@nytimes Listen to Dr. John Campbell every day, not the CDC or The New York Times. He'll keep you safe; they won't. https://t.co/EepdjHwtu1
@Stehooper @MattHancock That article is from January and those numbers for Pfizer included all days from 1d to 21d. We now know that the mRNA vaccines have *zero* effect until 14d. My tweet reference 21d. Learn to read - it is a useful life skill. Failing that, watch this: https://t.co/VfeVnZQWkl
@jmp740 @WHCOS @chrislhayes And just to be clear, UK has a thought out policy. They are giving 2nd dose after 12 weeks. It is not negligent. It is precisely timed, based on real data. This University Teacher examines the data. He looks at one dose vs two dose policy here. https://t.co/5ANTD18cHa
RT @_RL_W: US, learning from Zambia https://t.co/oaWyfxzoO1 via @YouTube
Skydda de sårbara. Vaccinera dubbelt så många med en vaccination - 92 % skydd mot infektion efter 2 veckor - dra ut på vaccinationsintervallet och rädda fler liv. https://t.co/mWq0ZiIOkJ via @YouTube
What is better 2X the number of vaccinated at 90% or 1/2 as many vaccinated at 96%? @CDCDirector @POTUS @VP. Are we trying to save the most people? @NorahODonnell @donlemon @maddow @AnthonyMasonCBS @CBSThisMorning https://t.co/rIhwNjUF2F https://t.co/p1vtK7plhT
US, learning from Zambia https://t.co/oaWyfxzoO1 via @YouTube
Dr. John Campbell supports 1 dose vaccine strategy.. would end virus by April.. too many invested in keeping restrictions in place even it means more death and spread with slow 2 dose guideline. https://t.co/Aam3vTjArX via @YouTube
US, learning from Zambia https://t.co/ryqbAv4j3F via @YouTube A 3 month delay between first and second vaccine shot would be very effective and allow everyone to get vaccinated and knock out Covid before variants take hold. Here's the data.
US, learning from Zambia https://t.co/P09tLzuuWK via @YouTube Evidence to why Variant infected Covid can be going up when Regular Covid stats go down. This is important for the U.S.
US, learning from Zambia https://t.co/LfoBEvQuj5 käyttäen @YouTube
@DrFaucis1 https://t.co/70GGDv7l2u
@PittCabe https://t.co/WqP0znlGc5
US, learning from Zambia https://t.co/rjIVDA3PJ6 via @YouTube
RT @taqh1: US, learning from Zambia https://t.co/YtgsVmywqw via @YouTube الجرعة الاولى تساعد بالحماية ٩٢٫٤ ٪ بعد ٣ اسابيع من تطعيم - وترتفع…
RT @taqh1: US, learning from Zambia https://t.co/YtgsVmywqw via @YouTube الجرعة الاولى تساعد بالحماية ٩٢٫٤ ٪ بعد ٣ اسابيع من تطعيم - وترتفع…
@MM20SS30BB @missdior456 https://t.co/YtgsVmywqw تابع هذا افضل من يعطي معلومات ستجد له حلقات قديمه
US, learning from Zambia https://t.co/YtgsVmywqw via @YouTube الجرعة الاولى تساعد بالحماية ٩٢٫٤ ٪ بعد ٣ اسابيع من تطعيم - وترتفع بعد الجرعة الثانية الى حوالي ٩٦٪ ، لذا يفضل الاستعجال باعطاء الجرعة الاولى ستساعد في تقليل الاصابات بشكل سريع
الدكتور جوهن من استراليا وتحديثات عن مكافحة الجائحة. https://t.co/zRlhdBYWAD
US, learning from Zambia https://t.co/FjZ0wkQsx8 via @YouTube #COVID19
New #coronavirus variants - Doctor John Campbell - US, learning from Zambia https://t.co/8hkgiOeBKO via @YouTube
Doctor John Campbell - Update - #coronavirus #COVID U.S. - learning from Zambia https://t.co/8hkgiOeBKO via @YouTube
US, learning from Zambia https://t.co/SeQgzVEcgB μέσω @YouTube
US, learning from Zambia https://t.co/fdXHn5tRTH via @YouTube
US, Learn fron Zambia? https://t.co/kihyyBO29R
@hugodejonge @MinPres @rivm, dus luitjes, niet bagatelliseren, niet onderschatten, niet onjuist inschatten: verscholen toename nieuwe #covid19varianten tegen afname cijfers dominante variant || “US, learning from Zambia” https://t.co/cIIxrZtRvJ via/TY #DrJohnCampbell_UK @YouTube
@JoeBiden @KamalaHarris You maybe should switch to a one dose regimen like the UK. https://t.co/6BWkiwrAFV
https://t.co/IfkdMQbSPm
@OEO43796646 @Zubhaque @IndependentSage you're welcome. I get my info from a variety of sources including https://t.co/J6eUDQ3Hea (but these podcasts can be very long!) and https://t.co/R52gyn3U5n among others. The following two videos may be of particular interest: https://t.co/9A2hNiN6ub https://t.co/URG74MDj0z
Interesting Youtube video One vaccine dose and two viral variants is worth watching https://t.co/soyNR6birr Download my two comprehensive but free educational text books or make a donation to the campbellteaching project using this link: http://159.69.48.3 Hard copy of t…
@LisatheSimpson @Efi20Efi Interestingly this came in over the weekend. Worth a watch, especially the first part. May well save a lot of lives. This guy has not spoken about the UK in glowing terms in the past and just basically looks at the data and explains it. https://t.co/CBaUpLOGXV
This is worth looking at - came in over the weekend. https://t.co/CBaUpLOGXV https://t.co/6HfBONkBCW
@ByrneLuc @Lissy_RP @EveryDoctorUK @NEJM I hope you now see what I was getting at. It's covered well here https://t.co/JwgmCwUO6f too by @Johnincarlisle
@MZ_GOV_PL @michaldworczyk Tu jest dobrze wyjaśnione na podstawie badań w UK, po angielsku: https://t.co/Pr64PWR3q4 #jednadawka
One vaccine dose and two viral variants https://t.co/fBlU4dEuHc via @YouTube
One vaccine dose and two viral variants https://t.co/k07NLYEEbG Follow the data, @Bundesrat_CH @alain_berset Start a one-dose-vaccine strategy! It’s not “just a YouTube video” - he always quotes his sources and the data! https://t.co/PYa7RTPbo1
One vaccine dose and two viral variants https://t.co/k07NLYEEbG Follow the data, @POTUS @VP Start a one-dose-vaccine strategy! It’s not “just a YouTube video” - he always quotes his sources and the data! https://t.co/PYa7RTPbo1
RT @GrowAPair8: American Leaders are so far behind on Covid. https://t.co/RihQNfGH7q Science data shows one pfizer vaccine shot gives 90%+…
American Leaders are so far behind on Covid. https://t.co/RihQNfGH7q Science data shows one pfizer vaccine shot gives 90%+ efficacy after 2 weeks. Every teacher could have been vaccinated and kids back in school by now. #ketchup #COVID19 @CDCDirector @NIH @POTUS @JoeBiden @VP
One vaccine dose and two viral variants https://t.co/0H1ddKzxlV via @YouTube
One vaccine dose and two viral variants https://t.co/6VoDZGdJ0C via @YouTube
RT @Visitkarte: One vaccine dose and two viral variants https://t.co/KT1OkgWnMd Follow the data, @POTUS @VP Star a one-dose-vaccine strat…
One vaccine dose and two viral variants https://t.co/NuVmaz2vsr via @YouTube Pfizer vaccine one dose short term is very effective. Vaccine passports coming. People usually misinterpret medical information. One case of genetic shift in the U.K. variant and the Cali variant.
One vaccine dose and two viral variants https://t.co/Q4SvfbJUQD via @YouTube
One vaccine dose and two viral variants https://t.co/J08VXsrG7p via @YouTube
@Skibble @FraserNelson @afneil https://t.co/U1jeVWIkNu
@PNhRisso @Dean62772558 @BorisJQuotes @Mike_Fabricant https://t.co/UTpsNVGGtw. There you go then. Complete with all references and put together in a way we can all understand :)
Pfizer/Biontech kann bei - 15 bis -25 Grad (Zeitraum von 14 Tagen) gelagert werden, und Moderna und Pfizer/Biontech erzielen bei einmaliger Dosis über 91 %. Es kann bis zu drei Monate später die zweite Injektion stattfinden. Gas geben bitte #DritteWelle https://t.co/W13o1SdTna
RT @BrianLiberal777: One vaccine dose and two viral variants https://t.co/ekPVWe3MRp via @YouTube Moderna and Pfizer looking at effectivene…
One vaccine dose and two viral variants https://t.co/ekPVWe3MRp via @YouTube Moderna and Pfizer looking at effectiveness of just one shot now that time has past and it's remarkably good 91-92%
One vaccine dose and two viral variants https://t.co/n0KULHA3Od μέσω @YouTube
Doctor John Campbell - #coronavirus #COVID19 - Update One #vaccine dose and two viral variants https://t.co/kQYHZnJN8N via @YouTube
The latest video from Prof John Campbell includes evidence that the UK’s move to delay #COVID19Vaccine second dose was a sound decision. Single dose of #Pfizer vaccine gives 92% efficacy. https://t.co/ebI10xAF5V via @YouTube
Und noch viel fundierter fasst das alles @Johnincarlisle zusammen. Und Recht hat er, wenn er sagt, dass man jetzt von UK lernen kann. https://t.co/eOcETeiDVF
#Vaccinatie strategie met #Pfizer mag weer om zegt John. https://t.co/s4BiugCGDJ
@eurotyke Did you see last nights update from John Campbell "It is a matter of national security" https://t.co/kyKKRUX9zY
@NitramThims @Watforddogs @JujuliaGrace @EveryDoctorUK @nadhimzahawi @MattHancock Martin, I suggest you watch this video which will explain the situation to you in a very clear and easy to understand way: https://t.co/kitzOYeUCF
@Gillesvin1 @afneil @Gillesvin1 if you still doubt what the experts are saying, watch this video and it will all be explained to you: https://t.co/kitzOYeUCF
@CatrellNeff @2dollarcasio @afneil @2dollarcasio if you still doubt what the experts are saying, watch this video: https://t.co/kitzOYeUCF
@Flick_Cornwall https://t.co/1xSSM6Ya64
@Tweet_Mouse @edwardpoole1975 @Flick_Cornwall @janethomson1952 @JujuliaGrace @EveryDoctorUK Paul Bienasz is utterly bonkers by saying "If we let immunity wane for a little while, say 4 to 12 weeks" What evidence is there that immunity wanes within 4 to 12 weeks?! Many ther experts disagree; this is not how the immune system works! See this: https://t.co/1xSSM6Ya64
RT @Visitkarte: One vaccine dose and two viral variants https://t.co/KT1OkgWnMd Follow the data, @POTUS @VP Star a one-dose-vaccine strat…
One vaccine dose and two viral variants https://t.co/KT1OkgWnMd Follow the data, @POTUS @VP Star a one-dose-vaccine strategy! It’s not “just a YouTube video” - he always quotes his sources and the data!
One vaccine dose and two viral variants https://t.co/KT1OkgWnMd Follow the data, @Bundesrat_CH @alain_berset Star a one-dose-vaccine strategy! It’s not “just a YouTube video” - he always quotes his sources and the data!
https://t.co/ekPVWe3MRp VACCINE MANUFACTURERS RELOOKING AT THE EFFECTIVENESS OF ONE SHOT OVER TWO ! )
Watch "One dose and two viral variants" on YouTube #DrJohnCampbell https://t.co/X6c2bumhao
Update https://t.co/t2231zsX62 via @YouTube
covid vaccine Update https://t.co/YAy2kwb622 via @YouTube
Publicación de los resultados de ensayos de la Fase III de dos de las vacunas: Pfizer (BNT162b2 mRNA): https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMoa2034577 Moderna (mRNA-1273): https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMoa2035389
A COVID vaccine is here! But how safe and effective is it? https://t.co/aRHU2u2KiR via @YouTube
https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMoa2034577
RT @MelHerbert: Pfizer mRNA vaccine data just published in NEJM. Mel does a quick review. https://t.co/00VwSKE2kx
Il #vaccino #Pfizer #biontech Un articolo storico su #NEJM. https://t.co/cxDYyQLPwX
A COVID vaccine is here! But how safe and effective is it? https://t.co/11ipkYwJXJ via @YouTube
@thenewmil Check this https://t.co/T2ef87kQnp
RT @MelHerbert: Pfizer mRNA vaccine data just published in NEJM. Mel does a quick review. https://t.co/00VwSKE2kx
RT @MelHerbert: Pfizer mRNA vaccine data just published in NEJM. Mel does a quick review. https://t.co/00VwSKE2kx
RT @MelHerbert: Pfizer mRNA vaccine data just published in NEJM. Mel does a quick review. https://t.co/00VwSKE2kx
RT @MelHerbert: Pfizer mRNA vaccine data just published in NEJM. Mel does a quick review. https://t.co/00VwSKE2kx
RT @MelHerbert: Pfizer mRNA vaccine data just published in NEJM. Mel does a quick review. https://t.co/00VwSKE2kx
RT @MelHerbert: Pfizer mRNA vaccine data just published in NEJM. Mel does a quick review. https://t.co/00VwSKE2kx
RT @MelHerbert: Pfizer mRNA vaccine data just published in NEJM. Mel does a quick review. https://t.co/00VwSKE2kx
RT @MelHerbert: Pfizer mRNA vaccine data just published in NEJM. Mel does a quick review. https://t.co/00VwSKE2kx
Pfizer mRNA vaccine data just published in NEJM. Mel does a quick review. https://t.co/00VwSKE2kx
@OlaAlfares طبعا و بثقة تامة و اللي بحب يشوف مدى نجاعة و امان اللقاح بقدر يشوف هاد الفيديو من احد الاطباء الغير مستفيدين ماديا للشرح عن اللقاح المرتقب بموضوعية تامة من شركة فايزر بناء على المعطيات الاخيرة من التجارب العلمية https://t.co/MqkhTEPjfY
Light at the end of the tunnel, here it comes @NEJM https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMoa2034577?query=featured_home - the vaccine for COVID19!!!!
Today the FDA’s advisory board is meeting to talk about Pfizer-BioNTech’s vaccine. This morning @NEJM published their paper on the Phase 3 trial results. https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMoa2034577?query=featured_home It has an updated version of the key figure from the FDA...
the Pfizer vaccine works better than expected https://t.co/wgT3rmhoNH
T
CB
M
I
BX
RJ
FL
R
M
MM
DM
D
M
MC
TM
P
RM
F
R
AC
CM
C
RS
A
I
MR
TM
JL
G
A
PV
DB
RM
MB
KM
SB
HS
O
ET
MP
T
ED
JC
DV
NN
CD
I
M
LC
KL
L
JG
JD
P
G
II
P
QV
A
SC
VJ
R
SS
ED
P
苦
LK
ト
JM
L
PP
MM
MD
H
PS
DS
D
OW
VN
SS
R
S
SZ
JF
SA
JL
S
K
サ
CB
CC
雨
B
A
C
CA