Mentions
Extended reach
Total likes
Video views
AI synopsis
The overall sentiment is one of strong scientific consensus dismissing hydroxychloroquine's effectiveness, exemplified by references to Cochrane reviews and studies stating it causes more harm than benefit. The authoritative tone and focus on systematic analyses contribute to the score of high impact and engagement, as proponents of its use are challenged with evidence-based rebuttals and calls for discontinuing further research.
Most discussions strongly agree that hydroxychloroquine is ineffective against COVID-19, citing multiple reviews and studies with negative conclusions.
Posts show a neutral to moderate level of interest in the topic, mainly referencing scientific analyses without deep personal engagement.
Many discussions delve into details of meta-analyses, reviews, and studies, reflecting a high level of technical engagement with the evidence.
The collective tone and substance suggest the findings influence opinions on policy and medical practice, reinforcing the consensus that hydroxychloroquine lacks efficacy.
Como derrubar a depoente com UM artigo. https://t.co/R8JgaaKK6k https://t.co/tTSupE8mp8
FDA 美國食品藥物管理局：不應使用奎寧(Chloroquine /Hydroxychloroquine)。 https://t.co/PEQy6UxThs Cochrane 實證醫學資料庫：奎寧(Chloroquine /Hydroxychloroquine)無效且增加不良事件。 https://t.co/mou6g9Z6sH NEJM 新英格蘭醫學雜誌 RCT：研究表明奎寧無效。 https://t.co/K8SFwaaaub
@AngelGarciaMon8 Aquí tiene información al respecto. Un saludo. 1) https://t.co/WjEw1gSHvd 2) https://t.co/AYsJVKMSFl 3) https://t.co/i5Vj7lop8c 4) https://t.co/c6qA7AZCo5 5) https://t.co/Y9sn2Us37I 6) https://t.co/0MJE61lCKc 7) https://t.co/wEsu31zzFl
@veen_els Als hij al iemand genezen heeft, is dat zeker niet met hydroxychloroquine. Zie https://t.co/L1IcdwUe3t en https://t.co/1yzcJvVwaK. Het is eerder een schande als artsen covidpatiënten daar nog steeds mee behandelen.
Finalmente, la revisión sistemática de Cochrane sobre Cloroquina e Hidroxicloroquina en Covid-19. Conclusión: No tiene efecto en mortalidad ni en progresión a ventilación mecánica. NO SE JUSTIFICA HACER MAS ESTUDIOS. https://t.co/h6sIqOGEZQ
@bowiepoet1555 @PierreKory When there's compelling data for IVM I'll start prescribing it. This has been already studied repeatedly for HCQ and it has no benefit and does have rare harms. So unless they have COVID and I'm refilling their HCQ for lupus or other dz, it's a no for me. https://t.co/zkS3FnnKxW
This study review examines whether ivermectin, added to standard COVID-19 treatment, can reduce hospitalizations. It involves adults with confirmed COVID-19 in Corrientes, evaluating ivermectin's effectiveness in…
This study tests if ivermectin, added to standard COVID-19 treatment, can reduce hospitalizations in adults with confirmed COVID-19. It uses a randomized, double-blind trial to evaluate ivermectin's potential in…
Dr. Marc Lajeunesse explains meta-analysis with an example showing its role in determining that hydroxychloroquine was not effective for COVID-19 treatment. The video also references a systematic review on chloroquine…
The video discusses the controversy around early experimental COVID-19 treatments, including the use of chloroquine. It emphasizes the importance of evidence-based medicine and explains why some doctors rely on unproven…
@RogezVeronique N'importe quel anencéphale formé en 3 posts sur Facebook peut raconter n'importe quelle conn... Mais pas vous, en raison des articles 32 et 39 de votre code de déontologie. Or... https://t.co/W8vIofWDya https://t.co/VfzkML4jLO Alors pleurez pas...
@dpilatti83 Blz. Vou montar um estudo multicentrico sobre duplo cego controlado comparando hidroxicloroquina versus placebo no tratamento da COVID-19. Desfecho de mortalidade e complicações. Ops, desculpe. Já existem vários. https://t.co/CDdhI5EGh0
RT @CLestuzzi: @filipporicci72 @StefanoBerto83 @GiuseppePalombo @sonospento Gli effetti collaterali sono noti già dall'uso in reumatologia…
@FoufiIv80917 @marc_plantier @Otsutsuki_khan RECOVERY : inefficacité HCQ https://t.co/B9rgzt5sWh SOLIDARITY : aucun effet https://t.co/bzhbVS2Frf Cochrane : pas d’effet, + risques https://t.co/s7OnDcjlEO
@arno26438968 @BorghuisRogier @KAFKA_Dev Een studie in een veel grotere cohort toont aan dat HCQ niet werkt tegen Covid en haalt uw aangedragen bewijs onderuit. https://t.co/oZUqhwWswH
@lcesarmonteiro @JeffersonP60526 @jessimleo @felipeneto SINGH, Jaipreet; CAMERON, Claire; LOKE, Yoon K. Chloroquine or hydroxychloroquine for prevention and treatment of COVID‐19. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, n. 2, art. CD013587, 2021. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD013587.pub2.
@ettourneur @sudokuvariante @IHU_Marseille https://t.co/7dWKY1eCjY
@edbrockx @jacobus_sa @rodd__serling @xicograziano @grok https://t.co/TZCAo993QE https://t.co/XW3aEruC66
@WhiteJoshuaL @MartinC86461960 @DrNeilStone So let's use the folks at Cochrane. Their methodology is published off home page https://t.co/8kiWm52Pxv Vs https://t.co/PMN4qf9K9Z Vs https://t.co/o4X9FJ7zdH
@kmax666 @crypto_radio7 @Pr_Chabriere_E @Nathali28824974 Je vous invite à consulter cette meta analyse avec une methodologie plus fiable tant au niveau de l’analyse statistique que des etudes sélectionnées qui sont toutes contrôlées et randomisees, faite par une équipe d’infectiologues et pharmaciens anglais : https://t.co/sJAHDNj8qk
@filipe_rafaeli @grok Cochrane Review (2021): Hydroxychloroquine for prevention and treatment of COVID-19 Conclusão: Não reduz mortalidade. Aumenta risco de eventos adversos. https://t.co/iZrOqWv4XP
2/ Cochrane Review – Singh et al., 2021 (Updated multiple times) Title: Chloroquine or hydroxychloroquine for prevention and treatment of COVID‐19 DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD013587.pub2
RT @IntegralAnswers: 2/ Cochrane Review – Singh et al., 2021 (Updated multiple times) Title: Chloroquine or hydroxychloroquine for prevent…
RT @IntegralAnswers: 2/ Cochrane Review – Singh et al., 2021 (Updated multiple times) Title: Chloroquine or hydroxychloroquine for prevent…
2/ Cochrane Review – Singh et al., 2021 (Updated multiple times) Title: Chloroquine or hydroxychloroquine for prevention and treatment of COVID‐19 DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD013587.pub2 https://t.co/gruOjRRDOG
@filipporicci72 @StefanoBerto83 @GiuseppePalombo @sonospento Gli effetti collaterali sono noti già dall'uso in reumatologia https://t.co/Sng4Ts1DkS e so o stati visti anche nel COVID https://t.co/XvBzkwY2qI https://t.co/XpLL2uLtTW Rimane il fatto che è inutile https://t.co/3KqcQtOyH7 https://t.co/eDbvv3BYoS
@camuso_angela Ragionamento capzioso. Come fa a dire che è l'idrossiclorochina a funzionare in associazione e non sono gli altri farmaci comuni a funzionare? Qui una revisione Cochrane sull'argomento: https://t.co/xmFQVNOWJt Ps. Non c'è nulla sopra ad una revisione Cochrane.
@JulienFort4 Depuis 2021 et le travail de la cochrane, on sait que ça n’a aucun effet et entraîne plus d’effets indésirables. Après, on peut toujours faire confiance à des amateurs, biaisés qui veulent absolument obtenir le résultat qui leur fait plaisir…
@Lancillotto810 @ah_ecco @splugged @ChrisMartzWX Le riviste spennapolli si fanno pagare per pubblicare ciofeche. Non le ritraggono, altrimenti i polli da spennare e i profitti diminuiscono. Stando agli studi decenti, l'HCQ risulta inefficace contro il covid dal 2021 (2022 e 2023 a richiesta). https://t.co/AHEsEzr28g
@c_realiste @NewmanJamsz @landofhop 2/ La revue Cochrane a évalué l'utilisation de l'hcq pour le traitement du COVID. Elle a conclu que ce médicament n'apportait pas de bénéfice clinique significatif dans le traitement du cov et qu'ils pouvaient augmenter le risque d'effets indésirables. https://t.co/z6Rgd4rovX
@elonmustiko @0xPotatow3 @hellnogueira @xDevLucca @srprogrammer https://t.co/dQIs1LNb4Z se for pra postar que seja no minimo isso
@babycatpicot1 @Dr_Steph_GAYET 2/2 Les sources: https://t.co/wAW6obBDvJ https://t.co/priZKpOY78 https://t.co/TLX2BswM6f
Alle data, Pieter? Nee. Heel veel data niet. https://t.co/qeGdBH9swS https://t.co/VtxEALwMyy https://t.co/ajwiRBXBUQ
@BorgerPieter Nee Pieter.
@tkcamrbcor47 #コロナ解毒 信じるか否か貴方次第……… #レプリコン #ヒドロクロロキン https://t.co/Tty9Ixqmo1 クロキンまたはヒドロキシクロロキンによるCOVID‐19の予防と治療 https://t.co/Oj8NZNDCeb
@HaNaAIVA7 信じるか否か貴方次第……… #レプリコン #ヒドロクロロキン https://t.co/zxDEUxDMCV クロキンまたはヒドロキシクロロキンによるCOVID‐19の予防と治療 https://t.co/lenPbF6qza
RT @SHADOW_DAVAI: @IAYc6jT82QeUbBL 信じるか否か貴方次第……… #レプリコン #ヒドロクロロキン https://t.co/zpLyUUKnxY クロキンまたはヒドロキシクロロキンによるCOVID‐19の予防と治療 https://t.…
RT @SHADOW_DAVAI: @IAYc6jT82QeUbBL 信じるか否か貴方次第……… #レプリコン #ヒドロクロロキン https://t.co/zpLyUUKnxY クロキンまたはヒドロキシクロロキンによるCOVID‐19の予防と治療 https://t.…
RT @SHADOW_DAVAI: @IAYc6jT82QeUbBL 信じるか否か貴方次第……… #レプリコン #ヒドロクロロキン https://t.co/zpLyUUKnxY クロキンまたはヒドロキシクロロキンによるCOVID‐19の予防と治療 https://t.…
@ZnotbNOwKkf4pWz @touyoui 信じるか否か貴方次第……… #レプリコン #ヒドロクロロキン https://t.co/zpLyUUKnxY クロキンまたはヒドロキシクロロキンによるCOVID‐19の予防と治療 https://t.co/cMB0gynHLy
@IAYc6jT82QeUbBL 信じるか否か貴方次第……… #レプリコン #ヒドロクロロキン https://t.co/zpLyUUKnxY クロキンまたはヒドロキシクロロキンによるCOVID‐19の予防と治療 https://t.co/cMB0gynHLy
RT @dense_evi: Earlier in the pandemic, limited studies found little preventive benefit, as concluded in this Cochrane review. The verdict…
@GhostOfKyiv420 @_everythingism @Rightanglenews @mcuban Stop trolling. https://t.co/vPDYH0vMuA https://t.co/YqeyZOX21B https://t.co/DMkwLTjUM0 https://t.co/olA2mefjpd
RT @JrmeBrwnCt: @fleurdotone @lonnibesancon Non. https://t.co/NsynUsxqaJ
@fleurdotone @lonnibesancon Non. https://t.co/NsynUsxqaJ
RT @JrmeBrwnCt: @Franck20270 @GalvezDidier1 Non. https://t.co/NsynUsxqaJ
@Franck20270 @GalvezDidier1 Non. https://t.co/NsynUsxqaJ
@OnQShu @Craig_A_Spencer Hello Big_Shu… No, it has not. https://t.co/a0e31k8u85
@i_nuffin @Craig_A_Spencer If you do not know what cochrane is… I don’t even want to engage with you in a medical debate: https://t.co/a0e31k8u85
@a11569440 @Craig_A_Spencer Hello « a »… Here is a reliable source of medical research. I will take their opinion a lot more than your anonymity… And if eventually data does suggest that HCQ is indeed effective, I will gladly prescribe it. For now, I’ll keep it for malaria. https://t.co/a0e31k8u85
@AlanSim34718124 @tryhardlessfail @elonmusk @therealZNO It was studied. It doesn’t work. Where did you get your medical degree? https://t.co/2xUv2lxHsX
@JlsRet51206 @nicolasberrod On peut continuer, pour la route. Remarquez que ses review sont bien plus récentes que la votre, il y a donc beaucoup plus de recul derrière. https://t.co/7jE2SymGYm
@newstart_2024 Very eye-opening research! Ivermectin Trials: https://t.co/tgjQ8EegcV https://t.co/rh9nYe2x8L Hydroxychloroquine Trials: https://t.co/A98jOrkimA https://t.co/0etOdarHA8 https://t.co/ouDwxMQwMC Where the feud arose: https://t.co/EtO4HPZjqu Why it's false: https://t.co/pqSi9NuNYD
And those quoting a small Cochrane Collaboration Review https://t.co/1wbPWv79pL Anyone else noticed a change since Cochrane (Australia) received (trust busing) Gates money, booted the cofounder (Prof Peter Goetschze) & implanted a new chief? Was their biggest fan.. not anymore.
@LaurentAragones @france_soir @raoult_didier Ça c'est parce t'es resté bloqué en 2020, depuis y'a eu qq autres études, hein !!
@WiscguyNE @AlastairMcA30 Re: "298 HCQ controlled studies say otherwise." https://t.co/JTEEOlXqDF Hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) doesn't work for SARS-CoV-2 either. Anyway, stay mad, bro.
@RidQuantumDrive @FlorianLemaitr5 La potion magique de Raoult n'a pas plus d'effet qu'un placebo ! Que de temps perdu ! https://t.co/JlEPo5yH3u https://t.co/PH3tdaOS8L https://t.co/pjNZ0F3oMR
@Sabisteb 12.02.2021 https://t.co/ygakwDrxUW https://t.co/jhM97KlJFk
@RandomRation @roger_clague @jimdtweet @LexWaters7 @BubbasRanch @Mark_A_Lunn @Kenneth72712993 @craigthomler @phlannelphysics @GeorgeJeff9804 @Rosie45703313 @NoelTurner194 @GillesnFio @Michael_D_Crow @TrixX306 @gmarkul @nonsequiturmeme @EthonRaptor @WayneAllanH @aSinister @BenKoby1911 @CDCollins5269 @JimBowersclimb @PushFourLeft @FreeSpeech4U_Me @jgorman2424 @jgatta06 @ChrisBBacon3 @agentsinaction @priscian @joseph_postma @ThruNoiz @d_e_mol @AndryGiles @NewNormality20 @nxgrs73 @9luckycrater09 @ejwwest @3GHtweets @Willard1951 @IBergwiesel @AdinoIsmath @evenminded121 @MikeDel21893959 @PvtMcAuslan @MartinJBern @TheOmeg55211733 @NikolovScience @USAMRIID_CA @FeelingWearing Hydroxychloroquine is categorised in a class of drugs know as 'disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs.' They are a thing. However it is not an effective antiviral: https://t.co/pAngME0dgq https://t.co/Q139cki3bS https:/
@DuSoFabulous @ArtArie12 That's two hours wasted time.. ☹️ Again: False medical claims in video. Hydroxychloroquine has no efficacy to treat or prevent COVID based on the results of many randomized controlled trials https://t.co/EPGzogNsJX
@FreedomChango @RBullrich @KrCarlit Disculpen si hay alguno repetido: https://t.co/cnegm9rIzG https://t.co/5s1twKYcpB https://t.co/7ek7jXQ3dY https://t.co/uI6FtjTutL https://t.co/b1ZN6xsvqD https://t.co/PvQJEOZjaV https://t.co/SsMwf8eSWb https://t.co/Ds3WtcjJP4 https://t.co/bJYzV1NaBT
RT @FORCEPS4: ・SARSはSARS-CoV-2とは異なるウイルス ・クロロキンはSARS-CoV-2感染症には効果なし それだけの話ですよ。 https://t.co/ueGgx02hlb https://t.co/qnfpK525cO
RT @FORCEPS4: ・SARSはSARS-CoV-2とは異なるウイルス ・クロロキンはSARS-CoV-2感染症には効果なし それだけの話ですよ。 https://t.co/ueGgx02hlb https://t.co/qnfpK525cO
RT @FORCEPS4: ・SARSはSARS-CoV-2とは異なるウイルス ・クロロキンはSARS-CoV-2感染症には効果なし それだけの話ですよ。 https://t.co/ueGgx02hlb https://t.co/qnfpK525cO
RT @FORCEPS4: ・SARSはSARS-CoV-2とは異なるウイルス ・クロロキンはSARS-CoV-2感染症には効果なし それだけの話ですよ。 https://t.co/ueGgx02hlb https://t.co/qnfpK525cO
RT @FORCEPS4: ・SARSはSARS-CoV-2とは異なるウイルス ・クロロキンはSARS-CoV-2感染症には効果なし それだけの話ですよ。 https://t.co/ueGgx02hlb https://t.co/qnfpK525cO
・SARSはSARS-CoV-2とは異なるウイルス ・クロロキンはSARS-CoV-2感染症には効果なし それだけの話ですよ。 https://t.co/ueGgx02hlb https://t.co/qnfpK525cO https://t.co/jlWtvf4tw2
@BenMarble_MD Hydroxychloroquine is anti-parasitic and not anti-viral against SARS-CoV-2. Prophylaxis includes COVID-19 vaccines. https://t.co/eygyo3GQRq
@JulienFort4bis @fluidloading En 2024, on sort encore ce blog qui ment sur le résultat d'études, et met des méta-analyse au niveau de lettres à l'éditeur... Un méta-analyse, ça ressemble à ça : https://t.co/zezVM7sM5Q Et la conclusion est sans appel
@BillyBostickson @CallumJCParr @flodebarre @franciscodeasis Again, your crank magnetism isn't going to work on HCQ, lab leak, etc. HCQ doesn't work. https://t.co/Nxy3AwRzr2 https://t.co/2YWLQOR0YB https://t.co/DMkwLTjUM0 https://t.co/QfWd7dTaKl
@BillyBostickson @Ticklicker56 @ChrisShaver64 @gtuckerkellogg You can spam as much as you want. HCQ still doesn't work. https://t.co/DMkwLTjUM0 https://t.co/mdqvkAY9AW https://t.co/ingSNJCgmQ
@daniel_corcos @kellywind @_everythingism @VaughnMises @LeviTD @gadboit It's your baseless paranoia. Folks might continue testing a failed drug in randomized trials, even though that can be unethical. Hence why warnings are given against that. So no, a drug being tested in a trial is not a rebuttal to it being failed. https://t.co/DMkwLTjUM0 https://t.co/sycrleyt8H
RT @Nopanaden: @AngelGarciaMon8 Aquí tiene información al respecto. Un saludo. 1) https://t.co/WjEw1gSHvd 2) https://t.co/AYsJVKMSFl 3) htt…
RT @Nopanaden: @AngelGarciaMon8 Aquí tiene información al respecto. Un saludo. 1) https://t.co/WjEw1gSHvd 2) https://t.co/AYsJVKMSFl 3) htt…
RT @Nopanaden: @AngelGarciaMon8 Aquí tiene información al respecto. Un saludo. 1) https://t.co/WjEw1gSHvd 2) https://t.co/AYsJVKMSFl 3) htt…
@AngelGarciaMon8 Aquí tiene información al respecto. Un saludo. 1) https://t.co/WjEw1gSHvd 2) https://t.co/AYsJVKMSFl 3) https://t.co/i5Vj7lop8c 4) https://t.co/c6qA7AZCo5 5) https://t.co/Y9sn2Us37I 6) https://t.co/0MJE61lCKc 7) https://t.co/wEsu31zzFl
@refusen05766521 @spunkmonkey1 @JamieBranagan @MichaelRosenYes Based on the evidence to date, IVM is not effective. HCQ likely to cause more harm and also ineffective at treating / preventing Covid. https://t.co/35SGvxIrjP https://t.co/CA02Kcsel2
@JSegor https://t.co/9O0jGDpYVl https://t.co/DMkwLTjUM0 https://t.co/SgSRfY7Wrx
@VigilantFox Not using ivermectin and hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) hasn't killed anyone, but rather the opposite. Results of randomized controlled trials: Ivermectin and HCQ are inefficient in treating or preventing COVID: https://t.co/kGIcgTZ96x https://t.co/Lil8bgbryJ https://t.co/kGMyaBz62O
@VigilantFox The CDC advocated hydroxychloroquine for malaria, not COVID-19. A drug working for malaria is not proof of efficacy against COVID-19. Hydroxychloroquine on COVID-19 actually increases the mortality. https://t.co/Lil8bgbryJ
Chloroquine ou hydroxychloroquine dans la prévention et le traitement de la COVID‐19 https://t.co/qo1mqwaCl6 https://t.co/oguSzwYdsN
@uTobian @RickABright Because it's produced by an anonymous group. Meanwhile, the WHO does not recommend using HCQ nor does the Mayo Clinic and this Cochrane (highly regarded) analysis of large trials shows no effect https://t.co/Huqq3A5fWM
@KatrinaHiker @GidMK Stop trolling. https://t.co/Nxy3AwRzr2 https://t.co/DMkwLTjUM0 https://t.co/hBIZzY4F7L
@landryphilippe3 @lionel_case “Très majoritairement favorables”
@Pedro4056383607 @EthicZet @RoghiJeanLouis @AlexisPhilo @AnneIbiza13 Cette review utilise et source 30 études, aucune ne venant de Lancet. J'ai cherché a trouver la même chose montrant l'efficacité de la choroquine mais introuvable. https://t.co/XKPKIYfFLw Mais on peut faire un échange de lien ?
@sharkzfanz Cochrane Review: https://t.co/d8ShYT8Pbj
@P_McCulloughMD Liar. McCullough's protocol has not proven efficacy in humans. Multiple randomized controlled trials confirm Hydroxychloroquine has no efficacy to treat or prevent COVID https://t.co/WX5vkzhSf3 https://t.co/AQEDya2tp9
RT @dense_evi: Earlier in the pandemic, limited studies found little preventive benefit, as concluded in this Cochrane review. The verdict…
Earlier in the pandemic, limited studies found little preventive benefit, as concluded in this Cochrane review. The verdict about its use as a treatment was more emphatic 2/8 https://t.co/9uuc6ioKb5 https://t.co/dgpG5gxpNn
@0minus_Prime n = 352 in treatment group Retrospective cohort study What was standard of care in March 2020 to May 2020? Was it consistent? Average age in control group? https://t.co/35SGvxIrjP https://t.co/3nnq482475
@DespiteTheVisor @JackPearl77 @IvorMectin1 But you are, that is grade-A conspiratorial bollocks. HCQ is not effective in treating COVID-19, so there's that. https://t.co/zASK7vYruq
@NobodyHadToDie @ZooBeliever https://t.co/o9RkhIZkzt
@Applecross2402 @Oliviersanstom @Levan05109714 D'autres études ont conclu à l'inefficacité de l'HCQ. https://t.co/LXLvI8jZ1O
@Applecross2402 @Oliviersanstom @Levan05109714 Manque de bol pour vous, il y a eu plein d'autres études après celle-ci qui ont démontré l'inefficacité de l'hydroxychloroquine. https://t.co/LXLvI8jZ1O
@taipan168 @PoeBrianL You must also strongly believe that HCQ is ineffective in treating COVID-19 due to this Cochrane review: https://t.co/HfvIOubX8f
RT @AtomsksSanakan: @Mike_N_Prescott @Miss_Pellin @GlennCarr6 @TWTThisIsNow @Wolf_Tech @DoubleDumas @What_Doubelieve @JimBowersclimb @BrknM…
@mentju4 @yoshkapundrick @MarionKoopmans "[...] wherever a single person propounds a number of unrelated denialist conjectures, poorly supported conspiracy theories, or pseudoscientific claims." https://t.co/IRtb5srACG https://t.co/WgkYkGCQxM https://t.co/DMkwLTjUM0 https://t.co/VW54y26oAS
@yoshkapundrick @MarionKoopmans But he won't accept reality on that. He'll brush off published evidence as 'just links', demand people have a real-time discussion with him as if that's how we figure out what's accurate in science, etc. He's beyond help.
@Mike_N_Prescott @Miss_Pellin @GlennCarr6 @TWTThisIsNow @Wolf_Tech @DoubleDumas @What_Doubelieve @JimBowersclimb @BrknMan @AGW_is_bad @JamesFranklinMt @aSinister @FredHikes @25_cycle @climate_fact @Doc_Valerie @USAMRIID_CA @jpad319 @Bostons80113133 @DanCady @Ceist8 @kevpluck @realDonaldTrump @RepMTG @desertphile @NBPTROCKS @TheDisproof @jimdtweet @MADmagazine @GOP
@PierreKory 2/2- https://t.co/XUb49lj1DF https://t.co/LQ6Qo0cALy https://t.co/irl3eYqVuw https://t.co/wZhfRO6qvm https://t.co/9ISVfRQaVQ https://t.co/kHa72dmXLc https://t.co/d7ZLMBWLoF
RT @Woodynist: @Maitre_Eolas @Olivierfente @raoult_didier @MathieuMolimard @fluidloading Adverse events are tripled compared to placebo but…
@Maitre_Eolas @Olivierfente @raoult_didier @MathieuMolimard @fluidloading Adverse events are tripled compared to placebo but VERY FEW SERIOUS adverse events were found. (Cochrane) https://t.co/7mn9ID3tr6 On est libre de croire une modélisation bidon non publiée des Pieds Nickelés ou une étude de référence (Cochrane). Le vrai est dans les données ! https://t.co/CKa94kQbmC
@PacoCordoba232 @TIzuriaga @gorka_orive Cochrane sobre ambos compuestos: https://t.co/ecbRJIVMG5
@joesanders33 @PoeBrianL @plagueprose Yes, you've been paranoid + incompetent for at least 3 years. "HCQ seems rather promising" https://t.co/tba6407lMX "the Cochrane review, which is the gold standard." https://t.co/DcIRdoo51c What does the "gold standard" say on HCQ? https://t.co/DMkwLTksBy https://t.co/PrTUiSEZ17
@aaronshem @StorkOnTheCork @DafeiD @joesanders33 Re: "I suspect we could have used HCQ to get viral loads down, improve outcomes and reduce spread this winter" https://t.co/wx29b6AnOc For posterity: So many climate science contrarians turned out to be just as wrong on COVID-19. https://t.co/Nxy3AwRzr2 https://t.co/DMkwLTjUM0 https://t.co/sMtIZ1xqJT
@JGisSatoshi @GidMK Stop trolling. https://t.co/Nxy3AwS7gA https://t.co/lgDZIyaHX7 https://t.co/SAfMyd8lmQ https://t.co/5QXDORSuTC https://t.co/C28XZv0gLb
@Horsepaste99 @lonnibesancon @GidMK Stop trolling. https://t.co/Nxy3AwRzr2 https://t.co/lgDZIyaa7z https://t.co/SAfMyd7Nxi https://t.co/5QXDORRX44 https://t.co/4FlIUa9kUw
@DiedSuddenly_ Entirely false! this is a new fraud! https://t.co/NIsN45v0zu
@GThonks @YJonesbeachblu1 @saltbeefsandwch @barbariantrade @DenverPolitical @AngryFleas @PogueMoran @FactsAreGood @faiiacy @Assquire_ @EyeH8Trump @StanPennington8 @squirrely_girlz @MAGA_Translator @MyChickenDinner @Caperloo5 @JonRFleming @Tiaduplent21890 https://t.co/Ogr5KBWszL
@BaretLouis @PapeThibaut @idrissaberkane https://t.co/7tmnJFgDHR
@PapeThibaut @idrissaberkane Nos seuls arguments, à nous scientifiques, sont ceux que l’on trouve sur PubMed ou ceux à propos desquels on peut débattre en congrès. https://t.co/7tmnJFgDHR
@PapeThibaut @EtienneKlein @PhilippeMurer Non, ni la chloroquine ni l’hydroxychloroquine ne fonctionne. Ni seules ni associées à un autre médicament. Ni en prophylaxie ni en curatif. Quelle que soit la posologie. Des études ont pu indiquer le contraire, mais elles sont isolées https://t.co/7tmnJFgDHR
@agentmitch93 @raoult_didier Je n’ai pas dit qu’elle aurait aggraver votre cas, mais qu’elle aurait pu le faire. Saisissez-vous la nuance ? Le risque de survenue d’effet indésirable est multiplié par 2,9 avec l’hydroxychloroquine https://t.co/7tmnJFgDHR
@agentmitch93 @raoult_didier Je le dis parce que les méta-analyses indiquent sans ambiguïté que le produit n’a pas d’efficacité, quel que soit le timing de l’infection, les associations médicamenteuses et la posologie. Le consensus scientifique est très clair https://t.co/7tmnJFgDHR
@MOJoh90 @ChampoDr @Pat70472402 @fluidloading Et non, ils n’ont rien trouvé du tout. Le consensus scientifique et les méta-analyses sont maintenant très clairs à ce sujet https://t.co/7tmnJFgDHR
@sylv_lau @raoult_didier Ça, par exemple, c’est le consensus médical sur l’intérêt ou non de l’hydroxychloroquine au cours de la Covid-19 https://t.co/7tmnJFgDHR
@Prudro01 @demandevidence1 @sassy_girl1000 @denisrancourt A lot of junk trials in that. Pick out the best ones and you get zip. That should not happen if HCQ was great. It might have some mild prophylactic effects, from other meta analyses. https://t.co/8dBHzSZyw2
@chidoricha @barriere_dr @MathieuMolimard https://t.co/7tmnJFgDHR
@caio21oliver @dudelbem Segue alguns trabalhos. Afinal os estudos estão liberados para quem quiser estudar, inclusive professor de Educação Física. No entanto, procure seu médico, caso necessite. Estou a disposição. Forte abraço! Hidroxicloroquina https://t.co/uujsp2Y0Hs Ivermectina
@LoLoWarn @lebon80 @GarciaVictor_ @Citizen4Sci Vous serez les derniers à défendre cette hérésie scientifique. Vous pouvez tordre les données dans tous les sens, la cochrane (c’est les gens qui sont spécialistes des meta-analyses pour info) ne dit pas du tout la même chose. https://t.co/9iR1UvvTZX
@jarad_christian @ZaleskiLuke Here's a question: If I look at 9000 pnts across 12 studies, does HCQ help? Answer: No. In fact, may increase complications. https://t.co/3WY0BfMNaV
@CongasMaracas @Inafr_officiel Ah oui encore mieux (détail : https://t.co/u0XIk1OaUl) Donc une méta-analyse sur des tas d'études différentes avec des protocoles différents, aucune n'impliquant de traitement précoce, aucune n'impliquant le cotraitement par azithromycine ou ivermectine. Donc EXACTEMENT pareil.
@Pr_EChabriere Je ne comprends pas ce mépris mais il faut avouer que la combinaison "magique" n'est malheureusement pas efficace chez les patients ! https://t.co/2UlnWz5VQM https://t.co/WLibGdSABh
COVID: https://www.cochranelibrary.com/cdsr/doi/10.1002/14651858.CD013587.pub2/full
@DrScheuch https://t.co/v0kQOfGVcw
@Soundofsnow108 @ABridgen One of these is hydroxychloroquine. Here's an actual medical paper on the subject https://t.co/B5MAPSrx7U "HCQ probably results in an almost three-fold increased risk of adverse events" is a quote from that paper, so your man is promoting something that's demonstrably harmful. 2/
@nrmnprd @FamoCrypto @jordanbpeterson These compounds existed many years ago. These tags were added at a later date, as you can confirm with the Wayback machine for these pages. Not to mention that there the current scientific consensus says that these compounds do not work. https://t.co/Rv7G4Zp9hL
@KarsSylvain @dupontaignan Nous avons inclus 12 essais impliquant 8 569 participants, tous adultes. Des études ont été réalisées en Chine (4), au Brésil, en Égypte, en Iran …. https://t.co/YfzUvjwLoj Après ta lecture on en reparle .
@MarcBonten @CarlaPeeters3 @PvanHouwelingen Er mogen geen verdere proeven met hydroxychloroquine of chloroquine voor de behandeling worden uitgevoerd. Deze resultaten maken het minder waarschijnlijk dat het medicijn effectief is in het beschermen van mensen tegen infectie, https://t.co/5VoP3xLPSQ
@barbarab1974 Idrossiclorochina non serve né nelle forme gravi https://t.co/lWDk3rHDoj né in quelle lievi-moderate https://t.co/hOo8EvJOVv La Cochrane conferma e aggiunge che ha effetti collaterali https://t.co/89kdOi0skd Il cortisone peggiora la prognosi https://t.co/Qcoj6hOHwm
@FacheDaniel1 @XavierLG2 @conspiration @InstitRousseau Mes yeux n’ont rien à voir là-dedans. C’est l’avis de l’ensemble de la communauté scientifique. https://t.co/pIDt5gI8ee https://t.co/oxEJQj6qnN
@AlessandroPeir4 Alto rischio di reazioni avverse anche gravi, soprattutto nei pazienti con COVID https://t.co/BQAxuQCyWj https://t.co/vdwWOy1Oil HCQ NON riduce mortalità e durata della malattia https://t.co/GI62BDPsN0 https://t.co/eDbvv3BYoS e non previene la malattia https://t.co/V2vl1dat49 https://t.co/whKfK5VOqe
@AlessandroPeir4 @Annamar63973859 @barbarab1974 Direi entrambi, visto che è indagato in Francia per falsificazione dei dati. https://t.co/fqag2PZMXJ gli studi hanno dimostrato nessun vantaggio e un aumento di rischio rispetto al placebo https://t.co/eDbvv3Cweq https://t.co/LCDHtAa7d5
@AlessandroPeir4 @Annamar63973859 @barbarab1974 All'inizio anche OMS e AIFA la suggerivano (ed è stata data alla grande anche in Italia) sulla base degli studi in vitro. Se funzionava, il rischio era accettabile. Ma si è visto che non faceva meglio del placebo ed era pericolosa. https://t.co/FLp5TZd5ou https://t.co/eDbvv3Cweq
RT @FConijnGZO: @veen_els Als hij al iemand genezen heeft, is dat zeker niet met hydroxychloroquine. Zie https://t.co/L1IcdwUe3t en https:/…
@veen_els Als hij al iemand genezen heeft, is dat zeker niet met hydroxychloroquine. Zie https://t.co/L1IcdwUe3t en https://t.co/1yzcJvVwaK. Het is eerder een schande als artsen covidpatiënten daar nog steeds mee behandelen.
@thierrybaudet Hydroxychloroquine werkt niet: https://t.co/98ZOb9lZhC
@Nordenslys @PvanHouwelingen Daar heb je zeer hoge, zeer ongezonde doses voor nodig. In normale, veilige doses werkt het in de klinische praktijk niet: https://t.co/L1IcdwULT1
@mike_knizner @SteveDeaceShow https://t.co/d2NQm6xKVz
@DiAndi33 @SteveDeaceShow https://t.co/d2NQm6xKVz As physicians we are obligated to follow scientific evidence.
@dogarrett Simples assim! Quem não entendeu ainda o que acontece na cabeça de alguns médicos, pode assistir o vídeo: https://t.co/Qu3xmMJ0SU
@alvaropereirajr Médicos são técnicos não treinados para fazer ciência e acabam brincando com a vida alheia. https://t.co/Qu3xmMJ0SU
@Debora_D_Diniz @medicina_cfm Médicos são técnicos não treinados para fazer ciência e acabam brincando com a vida alheia. https://t.co/Qu3xmMJ0SU
RT @cutecute_der: FDA 美國食品藥物管理局：不應使用奎寧(Chloroquine /Hydroxychloroquine)。 https://t.co/PEQy6UxThs Cochrane 實證醫學資料庫：奎寧(Chloroquine /Hydroxyc…
RT @cutecute_der: FDA 美國食品藥物管理局：不應使用奎寧(Chloroquine /Hydroxychloroquine)。 https://t.co/PEQy6UxThs Cochrane 實證醫學資料庫：奎寧(Chloroquine /Hydroxyc…
RT @cutecute_der: FDA 美國食品藥物管理局：不應使用奎寧(Chloroquine /Hydroxychloroquine)。 https://t.co/PEQy6UxThs Cochrane 實證醫學資料庫：奎寧(Chloroquine /Hydroxyc…
RT @cutecute_der: FDA 美國食品藥物管理局：不應使用奎寧(Chloroquine /Hydroxychloroquine)。 https://t.co/PEQy6UxThs Cochrane 實證醫學資料庫：奎寧(Chloroquine /Hydroxyc…
RT @cutecute_der: FDA 美國食品藥物管理局：不應使用奎寧(Chloroquine /Hydroxychloroquine)。 https://t.co/PEQy6UxThs Cochrane 實證醫學資料庫：奎寧(Chloroquine /Hydroxyc…
RT @cutecute_der: FDA 美國食品藥物管理局：不應使用奎寧(Chloroquine /Hydroxychloroquine)。 https://t.co/PEQy6UxThs Cochrane 實證醫學資料庫：奎寧(Chloroquine /Hydroxyc…
RT @cutecute_der: FDA 美國食品藥物管理局：不應使用奎寧(Chloroquine /Hydroxychloroquine)。 https://t.co/PEQy6UxThs Cochrane 實證醫學資料庫：奎寧(Chloroquine /Hydroxyc…
RT @cutecute_der: FDA 美國食品藥物管理局：不應使用奎寧(Chloroquine /Hydroxychloroquine)。 https://t.co/PEQy6UxThs Cochrane 實證醫學資料庫：奎寧(Chloroquine /Hydroxyc…
FDA 美國食品藥物管理局：不應使用奎寧(Chloroquine /Hydroxychloroquine)。 https://t.co/PEQy6UxThs Cochrane 實證醫學資料庫：奎寧(Chloroquine /Hydroxychloroquine)無效且增加不良事件。 https://t.co/mou6g9Z6sH NEJM 新英格蘭醫學雜誌 RCT：研究表明奎寧無效。 https://t.co/K8SFwaaaub
@LeSarturiP Entenda melhor a polêmica e sempre se lembre que médicos não são cientistas: são técnicos! https://t.co/Qu3xmMrpuk
@chloepinheiro @emeryfs Que tal assistir um vídeo sobre o assunto, enquanto espera o livro? https://t.co/Qu3xmMJ0SU
Mentira! Gastaram uma fortuna com boicote, notícias falsas e remédios inúteis! https://t.co/Qu3xmMJ0SU https://t.co/uurk3MVu95
@slnunley1989 @Kirkwoodk137 @tom_wellborn3 @RyanAFournier This was not known at the time, and back then the drug did show promise. I do not blaim Trump for this. But its now proven to have little to no effect. https://t.co/ZqT8Dpx2YY
@dubbelooo @ChrisAalberts Omdat bewezen is dat het niet werkt. Zie onder meer dit onderzoek: https://t.co/T2rZ6LLYsw
@PhilippeRainant @Damkyan_Omega Y a un truc qui s'appelle la Cochrane qui fait la synthèse des études sur un sujet (vous savez vos centaines d'études...), qui juge de leur qualité, les analyses et qui fait foi quant aux données de la Science. Je vous laisse voir leurs conclusions. https://t.co/9iR1UvvTZX
@PeterHotez Existem várias razões por trás desse fato: 1) Médicos não são cientistas: https://t.co/Qu3xmMrpuk
@leandrotessler O que estamos deixando de ensinar aos médicos? Metodologa científica? Estatística básica? Bom senso? https://t.co/Qu3xmMJ0SU
@alissondmaciel Tristeza...médicos não são cientistas. São técnicos. E quando são mal treinados...https://t.co/Qu3xmMJ0SU
@KateOceanmagic @Cwag929 @AshaRangappa_ HCQ for people infected with COVID-19 has little or no effect on the risk of death and probably no effect on progression to mechanical ventilation. Adverse events are tripled compared to placebo https://t.co/6acpMfjJ6y
@SuryaFaridaa @TyCardon Source: https://t.co/k0ipUmWvzA another source: However, the results from other clinical trials are not convincing and their therapeutic effects are unsatisfactory, as discussed in details below: https://t.co/7fYMtvy7yW
@josegallucci Médicos nāo são cientistas! https://t.co/Qu3xmMJ0SU
@rbdublei @Justsome66 @ConcernedDocMD @AdrienneTaren Government didn’t ban if as far as I’m aware. Studies just proved it wasn’t efficacious. https://t.co/o4sZF6IXDb https://t.co/X7FSnvUSCQ
https://t.co/0zGWRtfkwe
Over 35.000 mennesker har nu været i trials med hydroxyklorokin. Uden nogen effekt: https://t.co/wBrZ2CcM8k. Nogle studier peger ligefrem på, at det er farligt. Alligevel tror overraskende mange at det virker. Imens kan patienter der har brug for medicinen ikke få den. Avs avs.
@machinegunner9 @VarouxiLou @LavrentisBeria4 Κατ αρχάς μάθε να διαβάζεις τι γράφεις. Αφορά χρήση μαζί με αζιθρομυκινη (ΑΖ) που αποτελεί χορηγησιμο φάρμακο και σήμερα σε ασθενείς κοβιντ. https://t.co/GnTMHmEvNB Αν χορηγηθει μόνη της δεν έχει καμία απολύτως επίδραση. Ξυπνα
@globalism_no @RepMTG @Marcus4Georgia "HCQ for people infected with COVID-19 has little or no effect on the risk of death and probably no effect on progression to mechanical ventilation. Adverse events are tripled compared to placebo, but very few serious adverse events were found..." https://t.co/tEN1mprCjJ
@filipe_rafaeli @PedroNakamura @Mleitaonetto https://t.co/2RNKWupGxY
@karppalap @MinnaSalomaa3 @AAnalyytikko @lasleh Ja otetaan sitten tämä hydroksiklorokiini: https://t.co/6BaUZwwQKo #Trolli t ovat laulaneet näitä laulua jo varmaan vuoden. Haihattelua.
@Mrtin60143414 Esses são apenas alguns exemplos. Existem inúmeros estudos sérios publicados em revistas científicas que atestaram a eficácia da IVM e outos farmacos. https://t.co/yZfPoDGcot https://t.co/o8W5R2TlrQ https://t.co/hViCryHHpr https://t.co/6Ky5EtKUSi https://t.co/jHAm03Dn1h https://t.co/GrfETbcIWp
@mbsantos0407 @VoliaAlmeida @Claudio98900534 @Dr_Francisco_ Embora o estudo citado acima já afirme haver necessidade de + estudos p/ obter ação terapêutica, indico revisões sistemáticas COCHRANE. HCQ e CQ: https://t.co/bCglnfY7Rn IVM: https://t.co/ZDK7CF9iZj ACMN: https://t.co/oKukwtAXNk VitD: https://t.co/gbGgUfucS2
@leandrotessler @AssembleiaRS https://t.co/Qu3xmMrpuk
Prevent Senior usando pacientes como cobaias? Bem…médicos não são cientistas. Entenda: https://t.co/Qu3xmMJ0SU
@walterct @GloboNews https://t.co/zQSvNVPLuA
@theciclistt https://t.co/zQSvNVPLuA Mais um conclusão "tem pouco ou nenhum efeito no risco de morte" ou seja, não evita a doença grave. "Os eventos adversos são triplicados em comparação com o placebo" ou seja, o risco de eventos adversos pelo uso da HCQ ainda é maior.
https://t.co/KXV0xBNYmZ
RT @EdwinRankin: Chloroquine or hydroxychloroquine for prevention and treatment of COVID-19 https://t.co/stB4tHrCJe
RT @EdwinRankin: Chloroquine or hydroxychloroquine for prevention and treatment of COVID-19 https://t.co/stB4tHrCJe
Chloroquine or hydroxychloroquine for prevention and treatment of COVID-19 https://t.co/stB4tHrCJe
@lauramarise https://t.co/Qu3xmMJ0SU
RT @grahamwalker: @bowiepoet1555 @PierreKory When there's compelling data for IVM I'll start prescribing it. This has been already studied…
@bowiepoet1555 @PierreKory When there's compelling data for IVM I'll start prescribing it. This has been already studied repeatedly for HCQ and it has no benefit and does have rare harms. So unless they have COVID and I'm refilling their HCQ for lupus or other dz, it's a no for me. https://t.co/zkS3FnnKxW
@leandrotessler @MarceloOG3 https://t.co/Qu3xmMJ0SU
@ryman88 @ran84391878 @dennispillion I know you're not a scientist so your confusion is understandable. The quality of the meta-analysis significantly exceeds the paper you put forth. The gold standard Cochrane review draws same conclusions. Poorly designed studies aren't included. https://t.co/fPSs4rrqn9
@Estadao @EstadaoPolitica https://t.co/Qu3xmMJ0SU
@miriamleitao Para entender melhor a polêmica da cloroquina: https://t.co/Qu3xmMJ0SU
RT @mulhereciencia:
RT @mulhereciencia:
https://t.co/yFGYTIrDle
RT @mulhereciencia:
@pompoen9 @Skankhu67567057 @hugodejonge Zoals je ziet werkte Bhagteshwar Singh tijdens het onderzoek voor LSTM. Op hun site zie je dat "The Welcome Trust" hun hoofdsponsor is. "The Welcome Trust" is volledig eigendom van GlaxoSmithKline. Wij van WC-eend ... Nogmaals: Doe je research! https://t.co/c05YohCU2Y
@peRFectTennisUK https://t.co/yVx5u92xjD https://t.co/3RRqtcSiCC
@grinnysmiles @Leelze32 @GeorgeTakei CQ and HCQ offer zero benefit to patients in progression to intubation rates, and offer no benefit in existing mechanically ventilated patients. This is a recent compilation of all public and private global studies on this topic. https://t.co/tWDzOIVu0o
@DavidBCollum @RickyNave @AShrubberry @ZubyMusic Hum, this doesn't suggest HCQ is any good and in some cases is adverse. https://t.co/Vgd3vKoyQl
@CezarPrint @joaoires @MomentsBrasil Tem vários, vou mandar os últimos de maior relevância: Chloroquine or hydroxychloroquine for prevention and treatment of COVID‐19 (SINGH; RYAN; KREDO; CHAPLIN; FLETCHER, 2021) https://t.co/Nsn5lAjuZy
@DAngelicus @Emanuel40114038 @LLengoazza @intuslegens https://t.co/dvyPsOOF2O
@pbecchi @Libero_official La clorochina non è inutile, è proprio dannosa. Uccide la gente. https://t.co/fzt9sBeDfr
RT @lcos3060: Como derrubar a depoente com UM artigo. https://t.co/R8JgaaKK6k https://t.co/tTSupE8mp8
RT @lcos3060: Como derrubar a depoente com UM artigo. https://t.co/R8JgaaKK6k https://t.co/tTSupE8mp8
RT @lcos3060: Como derrubar a depoente com UM artigo. https://t.co/R8JgaaKK6k https://t.co/tTSupE8mp8
RT @lcos3060: Como derrubar a depoente com UM artigo. https://t.co/R8JgaaKK6k https://t.co/tTSupE8mp8
Como derrubar a depoente com UM artigo. https://t.co/R8JgaaKK6k https://t.co/tTSupE8mp8
RT @LajeunesseLab: @DrMCecconi Oh this is great! I did a short PSA about this on YouTube last week, but did not see this meta-analysis ht…
@DrMCecconi Oh this is great! I did a short PSA about this on YouTube last week, but did not see this meta-analysis https://t.co/Z3NJCI8I1f
@AlvGraf @caporezzodm @odelmoleao Última vez que eu informo, segue o estudo da cloroquina publicado na cochrane: https://t.co/rMDBUhefwJ
@macklinh Lastly, there was a Cochrane review of this topic. Cochrane reviews are the gold standard in meta analysis. Link: https://t.co/OT31NHnPxf
RT @drpichel: Finalmente, la revisión sistemática de Cochrane sobre Cloroquina e Hidroxicloroquina en Covid-19. Conclusión: No tiene efe…
RT @drpichel: Finalmente, la revisión sistemática de Cochrane sobre Cloroquina e Hidroxicloroquina en Covid-19. Conclusión: No tiene efe…
RT @drpichel: Finalmente, la revisión sistemática de Cochrane sobre Cloroquina e Hidroxicloroquina en Covid-19. Conclusión: No tiene efe…
RT @drpichel: Finalmente, la revisión sistemática de Cochrane sobre Cloroquina e Hidroxicloroquina en Covid-19. Conclusión: No tiene efe…
RT @drpichel: Finalmente, la revisión sistemática de Cochrane sobre Cloroquina e Hidroxicloroquina en Covid-19. Conclusión: No tiene efe…
Chloroquine or hydroxychloroquine for prevention and treatment of COVID-19 https://t.co/0LioMHWDWi
Finalmente, la revisión sistemática de Cochrane sobre Cloroquina e Hidroxicloroquina en Covid-19. Conclusión: No tiene efecto en mortalidad ni en progresión a ventilación mecánica. NO SE JUSTIFICA HACER MAS ESTUDIOS. https://t.co/h6sIqOGEZQ
@diogomainardi https://t.co/WkYOZYiCoN
New article: Chloroquine or hydroxychloroquine for prevention and treatment of COVID-19 https://t.co/GbCQLdcQCx #coronavirus #COVID19 #2019ncov https://t.co/52SOeBah6H
RT @caioqualunque: Interesting meta—analysis with some ambiguity in drawing unusual conclusions ( is the “less likely” presence of an effec…
Interesting meta—analysis with some ambiguity in drawing unusual conclusions ( is the “less likely” presence of an effect enough to suggest stopping investigations on a drug?) , but the final message is clear: HCQ doesn’t work for covid patients https://t.co/hT6HFDQdd9 https://t.co/HdGrL8ukAp
PubMed: Chloroquine or hydroxychloroquine for prevention and treatment of COVID-19: BACKGROUND: The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has resulted in substantial mortality. Some specialists proposed chloroquine… https://t.co/mQbSayQKhw #covid19 #SARSCOV2 #coronavirus
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD013587.pub2. 45. Lacerda M, Monteiro W, Sampaio V, Melo G, Val F. Mortality outcomes with hydroxychloroquine and chlo ...
Nicht erst das Coronajahr hat die Medizin zu vielen falschen Heilsversprechen und Widersprüchen verleitet. Ärzte werden in der Praxis einerseits mit ...
2021 (2): CD013587. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD013587.pub2 (https://doi.org/10.1002%2F14651858.CD013587.p ub2). PMC 8094389 (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc ...
Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2021; 2:Cd013587. Epub 2021/02/25 http://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD013587.pub2 6. Boulware DR, Pullen MF, Bangdiwala AS, et al ...
... No.: CD013587. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD013587.pub2. ผู้แต่ง. Singh B; Ryan H; Kredo T; Chaplin M; Fletcher T. ตีพิมพ์เมื่อ. 12 กุมภาพันธ์ 2021. อ่านฉบับเต็มได้ที่ ...
doi: 10.1002/14651858. CD013587.pub2. PMID: 33624299. Lamontagne F et al. A living WHO guideline on drugs to prevent covid-19. BMJ. 2021 Mar 1 ...
No.: CD013587. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD013587.pub2. www.cochranelibrary.com. Chloroquine or hydroxychloroquine for prevention and treatment of COVID-19 ...
https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD013587.pub2. Case study: resolving controversy during the COVID-19 pandemic. 21. Cochrane scientific strategy 2025-2030. Page ...
... No.: CD013587. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD013587.pub2. Authors. Singh B; Ryan H; Kredo T; Chaplin M; Fletcher T. Published. 12 2月 2021. Full review on the ...
2021 Feb 12;2:CD013587. doi: 10.1002/14651858. CD013587.pub2. PMID: 33624299. Lamontagne F et al. A living WHO guideline on drugs to prevent covid-19. BMJ ...
2021 Feb 12;2(2):CD013587. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013587.pub2. PMID: 33624299 Free PMC article. • Hydroxychloroquine in the treatment of ...
Ministry of Health and Long-Term Care. treatment of COVID-19. Emergencias. 2022;34:305-307. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD013587.pub2. ORCID iDs ...
... 10.1002/14651858.CD013587.pub2/full · https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2525608/ · https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36861976/ · https ...
... 10.1002/14651858.CD013587.pub2/full. Reply. Björn Geir on Sunday 04 December 2022 at 03:49. Here's a Scandinavian example of what might be ...
... 10.1002/14651858.CD013587.pub2/full. Notice also that all of these source show humility and acknowledge the limitations of our knowledge. The ...
... 10.1002/14651858.CD013587.pub2/full. Observe también que todas estas fuentes muestran humildad y reconocen las limitaciones de nuestro ...
DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD013587.pub2. Accessed 03 November 2021. Is chloroquine or hydroxychloroquine useful in treating people with COVID-19, or ...
2021 Feb 12;2:CD013587. doi: 10.1002/14651858. CD013587.pub2. PMID: 33624299. Lamontagne F et al. A living WHO guideline on drugs to prevent ...
com/cdsr/doi/10.1002/14651858. CD013587.pub2/full?cookiesEnabled. cochranelibrary.com. Chloroquine or hydroxychloroquine for. 5 yrs. 1. David ...
Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2021, Issue 2. Art. No.: CD013587. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD013587.pub2. Pengarang. Singh B ...
Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2021, Issue 2. Art. No.: CD013587. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD013587.pub2. Authors. Singh B ...
Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2021, Issue 2. Art. No.: CD013587. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD013587.pub2. نویسندگان. Singh B ...
Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2021, Issue 2. Art. No.: CD013587. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD013587.pub2. 作者. Singh B; Ryan H; Kredo T ...
Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2021, Issue 2. Art. No.: CD013587. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD013587.pub2. Autor*innen.
Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2021, Issue 2. Art. No.: CD013587. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD013587.pub2. Авторы. Singh B ...
No.: CD013587. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD013587.pub2. Cochrane. Trusted evidence. Informed decisions. Better health. 11-13 Cavendish Square
Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2021, Issue 2. Art. No.: CD013587. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD013587.pub2. 作者. Singh B; Ryan H; Kredo T ...
Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2021, Issue 2. Art. No.: CD013587. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD013587.pub2. Auteurs. Singh B ...
DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD013587.pub2. Authors. Singh B; Ryan H; Kredo T; Chaplin M; Fletcher T ...
Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2021, Issue 2. Art. No.: CD013587. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD013587.pub2. Autores. Singh B ...
2021 Feb 12;2:CD013587. doi: 10.1002/14651858. CD013587.pub2. PMID: 33624299. Lamontagne F et al. A living WHO guideline on drugs to prevent ...
DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD013587.pub2. Accessed 03 November 2021. Is chloroquine or hydroxychloroquine useful in treating people with COVID-19 ...
... 10.1002/14651858.CD013587.pub2/full; Symptoms of coronavirus. (2020). https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/symptoms-testing/symptoms ...
com/es/cdsr/doi/10.1002/14651858.CD013587. pub2/full/es El CDS o dióxido de cloro no sólo no cura el covid si no que puede resultar tóxico y ...
LC
CJ
AS
FG
D
GM
AP
G
AG
FA
VH
CB
C
G
J
DT
PX
MM
MF
I
CL
E
FL
OS
J
C
MS
M
ｹ
ｹ世
ゆ
業
K
ｹ日
ML
AS
H
OM
EM
CM
S
CR
UN
JL
DF
SM
W
U
き
ガ
ジ
フ
ル
F
T
K
M
FM
RM
TM
BN
R
GL
B
D
KK
FE
EC
M
DC
L
JF
M
IG
PF
WN
MO
JC
J
GD
SH
EG
Y
ZV
BT
DD
DO
T
DG
VL
PP
HB
BB
S
J
YL
老
T
D
票
ㄎ
CG
EB
IM
N
RR
SD
MB
Β
G
OD
IS
AO
CB
LM
DE
S
P
EP
C
S
S
M
Iᑭ
BH
LA
M
A
LS
LS
TN
MV
AA
PN
MD
A
HB
ER
XL
HS
RP
N
S
FI
CE