Mentions
Extended reach
Total likes
Video views
AI synopsis
Several discussions highlight specific aspects of the publication, such as the need to replace the term 'experimental validation' with 'experimental corroboration' to better reflect the relationship between computational and experimental work. Phrases like 'finally a paper that speaks our minds' and 'excited to announce my new paper' reflect a tone of enthusiasm and validation of the argument, illustrating how the choice of words and an encouraging tone contribute to a strong collective agreement and perceived importance of the publication's insights.
The overwhelming majority of discussions express strong agreement with the publication's concepts and ideas.
Participants show high interest, signaling its relevance to their fields.
Many discussions dive deeply into the methodologies proposed in the publication, indicating a thoughtful engagement with the content.
Contributors perceive the publication as having a significant impact on the way validation in research is approached.
Interesting argument from @MohieddinJafari et al on replacing the term "experimental validation" in computational papers with "experimental corroboration" to avoid connotation of legitimization. Fun read: https://t.co/2nnfb3wx97 https://t.co/n1IKbnYQes
Editorial from @JafariMohieddin, @gyuanfan, @davidcwedge and @NaserAnsariPour, discussing what it means to validate results obtained from bioinformatic analyses. They argue that calibration or corroboration would be better terms. https://t.co/wnuYJv5UlM https://t.co/dSVy8IcqAT
A fantastic piece on small & big data in biology: "We envision a world where ‘experimental’ scientists are requested to do ‘computational validation’ in the same manner that ‘computational’ scientists are currently asked to do experimental validation." https://t.co/TWmoShidZU
Excited to announce my new paper together with @gyuanfan @NaserAnsariPour @davidcwedge out in @GenomeBiology! If you feel frustrated by this question, whether your findings have been 'experimentally validated'? It would help when you read it. https://t.co/xDV4I7Jw8K
Should experimental scientists be expected to computationally validate their results? An interesting idea. What do you think? https://t.co/UBiYLDUuwp #bioinformatics #datascience #biology #sciencetwitter https://t.co/jWZ82Tkkmg
Finally a paper that speaks our minds
This video discusses the challenges of traditional experimental validation methods in the context of massive data sets. It suggests a shift towards new frameworks that emphasize adaptability and iterative testing for…
This video discusses the challenges of traditional experimental validation methods in the context of massive data sets. It emphasizes the need for new frameworks that prioritize adaptability and iterative testing to…
Cannot agree more!!! I have noticed this paper in 2019 & would like to share another paper endorsing computational biology / medicine, entitled "Re-evaluating experimental validation in the Big Data Era: a conceptual argument". https://t.co/r4iwTiiOgJ https://t.co/eBkleGOjPX
This reminds me of this other perspective
@DNA_RNA_Uni For more details, I suggest reading this: https://t.co/xDV4I7Jw8K
RT @MohieddinJafari: Luckily, I heard a coherent voice (Bioinformatics 2022 https://t.co/45KXB9riJG) with our argument (Genome Biology 2021…
RT @MohieddinJafari: Luckily, I heard a coherent voice (Bioinformatics 2022 https://t.co/45KXB9riJG) with our argument (Genome Biology 2021…
Luckily, I heard a coherent voice (Bioinformatics 2022 https://t.co/45KXB9riJG) with our argument (Genome Biology 2021 https://t.co/Qu4wweraYK). This motivates me to invest time in opinion articles as well as research papers. @NaserAnsariPour @davidcwedge @victorgreiff https://t.co/uQFb224LgN
@aunicorn1o O segundo texto de opinião que gosto é esse: https://t.co/toAiIAyhXm
@eugenevalkov @sokrypton Computational work opens our eyes to so many new discoveries. On this basis, experimental work and computational work should be taken as a corroborative work and not validation of each other. https://t.co/0z3Vvle0mz
@cabbagesofdoom @chelysheva_i @UniofOxford Then, You can refer those people to this article: Re-evaluating experimental validation in the Big Data Era: a conceptual argument https://t.co/xDV4I7rUKa
در آخر به کمک مهمان عزیز پادکست خانم دکتر فاطمه زارع (https://t.co/fJcn8gKCia)در مورد محتوای مقاله صحبت می کنیم. عنوان قسمت دوازدهم: از ویرگول تا ژنوم بیول مقاله (https://t.co/u5W5OxsJXJ) این اپیزود از طریق این لینک در دسترس است.
RT @LewisLab: I may just attach this paper to our response to reviewers the next time we're asked to validate RNA-seq with qPCR. https://t.…
RT @LewisLab: I may just attach this paper to our response to reviewers the next time we're asked to validate RNA-seq with qPCR. https://t.…
RT @thedataprof: Finally a paper that speaks our minds
Finally a paper that speaks our minds
Re-evaluating experimental validation in the Big Data Era: a conceptual argument https://t.co/R5ufz85phH
RT @fabian_theis: Interesting argument from @MohieddinJafari et al on replacing the term "experimental validation" in computational papers …
RT @compBiology: A computational biologist should corroborate, not validate https://t.co/Gywz7Bm3jt #Bioinformatics @GenomeBiology
RT @MohieddinJafari: Excited to announce my new paper together with @gyuanfan @NaserAnsariPour @davidcwedge out in @GenomeBiology! If you…
RT @fabian_theis: Interesting argument from @MohieddinJafari et al on replacing the term "experimental validation" in computational papers …
RT @fabian_theis: Interesting argument from @MohieddinJafari et al on replacing the term "experimental validation" in computational papers …
RT @fabian_theis: Interesting argument from @MohieddinJafari et al on replacing the term "experimental validation" in computational papers …
RT @fabian_theis: Interesting argument from @MohieddinJafari et al on replacing the term "experimental validation" in computational papers …
RT @fabian_theis: Interesting argument from @MohieddinJafari et al on replacing the term "experimental validation" in computational papers …
RT @fabian_theis: Interesting argument from @MohieddinJafari et al on replacing the term "experimental validation" in computational papers …
RT @fabian_theis: Interesting argument from @MohieddinJafari et al on replacing the term "experimental validation" in computational papers …
RT @fabian_theis: Interesting argument from @MohieddinJafari et al on replacing the term "experimental validation" in computational papers …
RT @fabian_theis: Interesting argument from @MohieddinJafari et al on replacing the term "experimental validation" in computational papers …
Re-evaluating experimental validation in the Big Data Era: a conceptual argument https://t.co/d303uecrmo
RT @fabian_theis: Interesting argument from @MohieddinJafari et al on replacing the term "experimental validation" in computational papers …
RT @fabian_theis: Interesting argument from @MohieddinJafari et al on replacing the term "experimental validation" in computational papers …
RT @fabian_theis: Interesting argument from @MohieddinJafari et al on replacing the term "experimental validation" in computational papers …
RT @fabian_theis: Interesting argument from @MohieddinJafari et al on replacing the term "experimental validation" in computational papers …
RT @fabian_theis: Interesting argument from @MohieddinJafari et al on replacing the term "experimental validation" in computational papers …
@bhaibeka @GenomeBiology @NaserAnsariPour @davidcwedge @gyuanfan @markowetzlab https://t.co/xDV4I7Jw8K
RT @fabian_theis: Interesting argument from @MohieddinJafari et al on replacing the term "experimental validation" in computational papers …
RT @fabian_theis: Interesting argument from @MohieddinJafari et al on replacing the term "experimental validation" in computational papers …
RT @fabian_theis: Interesting argument from @MohieddinJafari et al on replacing the term "experimental validation" in computational papers …
RT @fabian_theis: Interesting argument from @MohieddinJafari et al on replacing the term "experimental validation" in computational papers …
Interesting argument from @MohieddinJafari et al on replacing the term "experimental validation" in computational papers with "experimental corroboration" to avoid connotation of legitimization. Fun read: https://t.co/2nnfb3wx97 https://t.co/n1IKbnYQes
RT @moorejh: Should experimental scientists be expected to computationally validate their results? An interesting idea. What do you think?…
RT @moorejh: Should experimental scientists be expected to computationally validate their results? An interesting idea. What do you think?…
RT @moorejh: Should experimental scientists be expected to computationally validate their results? An interesting idea. What do you think?…
RT @moorejh: Should experimental scientists be expected to computationally validate their results? An interesting idea. What do you think?…
RT @LewisLab: I may just attach this paper to our response to reviewers the next time we're asked to validate RNA-seq with qPCR. https://t.…
RT @LewisLab: I may just attach this paper to our response to reviewers the next time we're asked to validate RNA-seq with qPCR. https://t.…
RT @moorejh: Should experimental scientists be expected to computationally validate their results? An interesting idea. What do you think?…
RT @moorejh: Should experimental scientists be expected to computationally validate their results? An interesting idea. What do you think?…
RT @moorejh: Should experimental scientists be expected to computationally validate their results? An interesting idea. What do you think?…
RT @moorejh: Should experimental scientists be expected to computationally validate their results? An interesting idea. What do you think?…
Should experimental scientists be expected to computationally validate their results? An interesting idea. What do you think? https://t.co/UBiYLDUuwp #bioinformatics #datascience #biology #sciencetwitter https://t.co/jWZ82Tkkmg
I may just attach this paper to our response to reviewers the next time we're asked to validate RNA-seq with qPCR. https://t.co/ZqlNu70Gut
Re-evaluating experimental validation in the Big Data Era: a conceptual argument https://t.co/5eBc9G1wu5
RT @GenomeBiology: Editorial from @JafariMohieddin, @gyuanfan, @davidcwedge and @NaserAnsariPour, discussing what it means to validate resu…
RT @BioDecoded: Re-evaluating experimental validation in the Big Data Era: a conceptual argument | Genome Biology https://t.co/UmOD6ixeUE…
RT @BioDecoded: Re-evaluating experimental validation in the Big Data Era: a conceptual argument | Genome Biology https://t.co/UmOD6ixeUE…
Re-evaluating experimental validation in the Big Data Era: a conceptual argument | Genome Biology https://t.co/UmOD6ixeUE #Bioinformatics https://t.co/njpM7BAd9j
RT @JSperschneider: A fantastic piece on small & big data in biology: "We envision a world where ‘experimental’ scientists are requested to…
RT @GenomeBiology: Editorial from @JafariMohieddin, @gyuanfan, @davidcwedge and @NaserAnsariPour, discussing what it means to validate resu…
RT @JSperschneider: A fantastic piece on small & big data in biology: "We envision a world where ‘experimental’ scientists are requested to…
RT @GenomeBiology: Editorial from @JafariMohieddin, @gyuanfan, @davidcwedge and @NaserAnsariPour, discussing what it means to validate resu…
RT @compBiology: A computational biologist should corroborate, not validate https://t.co/Gywz7Bm3jt #Bioinformatics @GenomeBiology
RT @compBiology: A computational biologist should corroborate, not validate https://t.co/Gywz7Bm3jt #Bioinformatics @GenomeBiology
RT @compBiology: A computational biologist should corroborate, not validate https://t.co/Gywz7Bm3jt #Bioinformatics @GenomeBiology
A computational biologist should corroborate, not validate https://t.co/Gywz7Bm3jt #Bioinformatics @GenomeBiology
Re-evaluating experimental validation in the Big Data Era: a conceptual argument https://t.co/FEH4JoFwwo
RT @daweonline: Re-evaluating experimental validation in the Big Data Era: a conceptual argument | Genome Biology | Full Text https://t.co/…
RT @daweonline: Re-evaluating experimental validation in the Big Data Era: a conceptual argument | Genome Biology | Full Text https://t.co/…
RT @daweonline: Re-evaluating experimental validation in the Big Data Era: a conceptual argument | Genome Biology | Full Text https://t.co/…
RT @GenomeBiology: Editorial from @JafariMohieddin, @gyuanfan, @davidcwedge and @NaserAnsariPour, discussing what it means to validate resu…
RT @daweonline: Re-evaluating experimental validation in the Big Data Era: a conceptual argument | Genome Biology | Full Text https://t.co/…
RT @JSperschneider: A fantastic piece on small & big data in biology: "We envision a world where ‘experimental’ scientists are requested to…
RT @JSperschneider: A fantastic piece on small & big data in biology: "We envision a world where ‘experimental’ scientists are requested to…
RT @GenomeBiology: Editorial from @JafariMohieddin, @gyuanfan, @davidcwedge and @NaserAnsariPour, discussing what it means to validate resu…
RT @GenomeBiology: Editorial from @JafariMohieddin, @gyuanfan, @davidcwedge and @NaserAnsariPour, discussing what it means to validate resu…
RT @GenomeBiology: Editorial from @JafariMohieddin, @gyuanfan, @davidcwedge and @NaserAnsariPour, discussing what it means to validate resu…
RT @daweonline: Re-evaluating experimental validation in the Big Data Era: a conceptual argument | Genome Biology | Full Text https://t.co/…
RT @GenomeBiology: Editorial from @JafariMohieddin, @gyuanfan, @davidcwedge and @NaserAnsariPour, discussing what it means to validate resu…
RT @GenomeBiology: Editorial from @JafariMohieddin, @gyuanfan, @davidcwedge and @NaserAnsariPour, discussing what it means to validate resu…
A fantastic piece on small & big data in biology: "We envision a world where ‘experimental’ scientists are requested to do ‘computational validation’ in the same manner that ‘computational’ scientists are currently asked to do experimental validation." https://t.co/TWmoShidZU
RT @GenomeBiology: Editorial from @JafariMohieddin, @gyuanfan, @davidcwedge and @NaserAnsariPour, discussing what it means to validate resu…
RT @GenomeBiology: Editorial from @JafariMohieddin, @gyuanfan, @davidcwedge and @NaserAnsariPour, discussing what it means to validate resu…
RT @GenomeBiology: Editorial from @JafariMohieddin, @gyuanfan, @davidcwedge and @NaserAnsariPour, discussing what it means to validate resu…
Re-evaluating experimental validation in the Big Data Era: a conceptual argument. https://t.co/kthDVJ6syh @GenomeBiology
RT @GenomeBiology: Editorial from @JafariMohieddin, @gyuanfan, @davidcwedge and @NaserAnsariPour, discussing what it means to validate resu…
RT @MohieddinJafari: Excited to announce my new paper together with @gyuanfan @NaserAnsariPour @davidcwedge out in @GenomeBiology! If you…
RT @GenomeBiology: Editorial from @JafariMohieddin, @gyuanfan, @davidcwedge and @NaserAnsariPour, discussing what it means to validate resu…
RT @MohieddinJafari: Excited to announce my new paper together with @gyuanfan @NaserAnsariPour @davidcwedge out in @GenomeBiology! If you…
Editorial from @JafariMohieddin, @gyuanfan, @davidcwedge and @NaserAnsariPour, discussing what it means to validate results obtained from bioinformatic analyses. They argue that calibration or corroboration would be better terms. https://t.co/wnuYJv5UlM https://t.co/dSVy8IcqAT
RT @MohieddinJafari: Excited to announce my new paper together with @gyuanfan @NaserAnsariPour @davidcwedge out in @GenomeBiology! If you…
Excited to announce my new paper together with @gyuanfan @NaserAnsariPour @davidcwedge out in @GenomeBiology! If you feel frustrated by this question, whether your findings have been 'experimentally validated'? It would help when you read it. https://t.co/xDV4I7Jw8K