Mentions
Extended reach
Total likes
Video views
AI synopsis
Discussions emphasize the importance of the research, with examples highlighting the role of grasslands versus forests in carbon sequestration, and references to specific studies, such as Terrer et al. 2021. The tone combines curiosity and respect, especially when mentioning the research's potential to influence climate modeling and understanding of ecosystem responses to elevated CO2.
Most discussions acknowledge the significance of Terrer et al.'s findings and support the idea that elevated CO2 creates a trade-off between plant and soil carbon storage.
Posts demonstrate high curiosity, referencing specific studies like Terrer et al. 2021, and sharing enthusiasm for the research and its implications.
Many commenters actively discuss the research details, mentioning concepts like C stabilization, microbial roles, and differences between ecosystems, showing deep involvement.
Though some express interest in reading the article and note potential revision of climate models, the overall consensus suggests a moderate recognition of its importance in environmental science.
A trade-off between plant and soil carbon storage under elevated CO2 (and it looks it might have to do with #mycorrhiza) Terrer et al. @Nature https://t.co/3sqlE9mTAY
A trade-off between plant and soil carbon storage under elevated CO2 | Nature https://t.co/MHDzDyqqQP
A trade-off between plant and soil carbon storage under elevated CO2 @c_terrer et al, @nature https://t.co/kVPNG5JFdx
...y también nos olvidamos de que los pastizales son también importantes sumideros de carbono, a veces más efectivos q los bosques (por cierto, los autores tampoco son expertos en gases GEI), por ejemplo: https://t.co/AX29D1aLj3 https://t.co/KpA46b7LHI
'til this summer, @c_terrer was a Lawrence Fellow and now he's just started his own group @MIT_CEE!! He's hiring a postdoc...so don't be shy. His recent paper https://t.co/pAn1Fc5S0I showed elevated CO2 helps grasslands accrue carbon belowground (where its safe and sound).
El paper original está en https://t.co/VsaMRKJSoj.
Trees are a superefficient way to sequester carbon, but planting the wrong trees in the wrong place can cause harm. This video discusses how native forests excel in delivering ecosystem benefits like carbon storage and…
Les arbres sont très efficaces pour stocker le carbone, mais planter les mauvais arbres aux mauvais endroits peut nuire à l'écosystème. Discover how restoring natural forests helps absorb carbon dioxide, supports…
The video discusses agroecosystems, ecological intensification, and their impact on biodiversity. It explores the relationship between agriculture and biodiversity, highlighting a research experiment in Villalgordo del…
RT @atvingeniero: ...y también nos olvidamos de que los pastizales son también importantes sumideros de carbono, a veces más efectivos q lo…
...y también nos olvidamos de que los pastizales son también importantes sumideros de carbono, a veces más efectivos q los bosques (por cierto, los autores tampoco son expertos en gases GEI), por ejemplo: https://t.co/AX29D1aLj3 https://t.co/KpA46b7LHI
@abazoo_ @ProfMarkMaslin Terrer et al 2021 - A trade-off between plant and soil carbon storage under elevated CO2 https://t.co/hN3GaMC7vA
2.- Terrer et al 2021 https://t.co/VsaMRKJSoj, donde se muestra que la absorción de C por parte de pastizales no se ve muy afectada por el calentamiento global, mientras que por parte de bosques sí.
RT @PabloPastos: @YamatLucas @AgusBC3 Add the reduced stability of the C fixed by trees compared to grasslands: https://t.co/YsMYAbXAQO htt…
@YamatLucas @AgusBC3 Add the reduced stability of the C fixed by trees compared to grasslands: https://t.co/YsMYAbXAQO https://t.co/h40Z24HB5h https://t.co/neyBhks5Je & problems in forests to fix C at elevated CO2 concentrations https://t.co/VsaMRKJSoj Yet we will still have people that don't listen.
Thanks to Darcy McRose, I had the privilege of hearing @c_terrer speak about his recent work today. His 2021 paper is very worth your time. "A trade-off between plant and soil carbon storage under elevated CO2" https://t.co/MpMCg49BEX
'til this summer, @c_terrer was a Lawrence Fellow and now he's just started his own group @MIT_CEE!! He's hiring a postdoc...so don't be shy. His recent paper https://t.co/pAn1Fc5S0I showed elevated CO2 helps grasslands accrue carbon belowground (where its safe and sound).
@Jeffinerca @CarrotWarrior_ @BioLumbee Corrected link to the above for others who have trouble with Twitter's shortened link: https://t.co/c2tOqzwcXa (It's worth a read!)
RT @ASamuelRosa: One of Earth’s giant carbon sinks may have been overestimated @Pedometrics https://t.co/52rrpi2LLG
RT @ASamuelRosa: One of Earth’s giant carbon sinks may have been overestimated @Pedometrics https://t.co/52rrpi2LLG
RT @ASamuelRosa: One of Earth’s giant carbon sinks may have been overestimated @Pedometrics https://t.co/52rrpi2LLG
One of Earth’s giant carbon sinks may have been overestimated @Pedometrics https://t.co/52rrpi2LLG
RT @mrillig: A trade-off between plant and soil carbon storage under elevated CO2 (and it looks it might have to do with #mycorrhiza) Te…
CO2上昇による森林バイオマスの増加は土壌Cの増加をもたらさない。外生菌根がNなどの養分をより多く獲得するため。AM性の草原ではAMの窒素獲得力が弱いので土壌Cが増・・・ ＞A trade-off between plant and soil carbon storage under elevated CO2 https://t.co/FF6aGWtQMc
@Dr_Kemperor Okay, I just squealed your name, thank you! I dm you my email address https://t.co/19NYPvelAi
Nature I don't have $199 to read the article. I do want to read it though ugh! "A trade-off between plant and soil carbon storage under elevated CO2"
El paper original está en https://t.co/VsaMRKJSoj.
RT @mrillig: A trade-off between plant and soil carbon storage under elevated CO2 (and it looks it might have to do with #mycorrhiza) Te…
Read my Mar 26 Newsletter featuring “A trade-off between plant and soil carbon storage under elevated CO2” https://t.co/OSOQHxbner.
RT @mrillig: A trade-off between plant and soil carbon storage under elevated CO2 (and it looks it might have to do with #mycorrhiza) Te…
RT @mrillig: A trade-off between plant and soil carbon storage under elevated CO2 (and it looks it might have to do with #mycorrhiza) Te…
RT @mrillig: A trade-off between plant and soil carbon storage under elevated CO2 (and it looks it might have to do with #mycorrhiza) Te…
RT @mrillig: A trade-off between plant and soil carbon storage under elevated CO2 (and it looks it might have to do with #mycorrhiza) Te…
A trade-off between plant and soil carbon storage under elevated CO2 https://t.co/9xQhDEb2bw
A trade-off between plant and soil carbon storage under elevated CO2 (and it looks it might have to do with #mycorrhiza) Terrer et al. @Nature https://t.co/3sqlE9mTAY
A trade-off between plant and soil carbon storage under elevated CO2 https://t.co/1GRwBaQSkw https://t.co/0Uexkgn8cH | #research #manuscripts @nature
A trade-off between plant and soil carbon storage under elevated CO2 @c_terrer et al, @nature https://t.co/kVPNG5JFdx
A trade-off between plant and soil carbon storage under elevated CO2 | Nature https://t.co/MHDzDyqqQP