Mentions
Extended reach
Total likes
Video views
AI synopsis
The discussions reflect a strong leaning toward the lab origin hypothesis, with posters citing specific research papers, virus features, and scientific debates, often using technical language to argue their points. Words like 'unusual features,' 'evidence,' and references to investigations demonstrate deep engagement and a desire to influence perceptions about the virus’s origins.
Most discussions support the possibility of a laboratory origin, with many posts highlighting scientific papers and features that suggest lab leak as a plausible scenario.
Interest is high, as posters reference technical studies, specific virus features, and ongoing investigations, indicating engagement with complex scientific debates.
Posts delve into detailed scientific arguments, mention specific research articles, and critique different perspectives, showing active engagement with the topic.
The discussions emphasize the significance of understanding COVID-19’s origins, referencing possible implications for public health and scientific transparency, which signals moderate impact on the wider narrative.
本気で勉強する気があるなら、私が100本以上読んだ論文のうち、重要と思われる4つを紹介しよう。新型コロナウイルスの特徴を知る上で必須の論文。どれも過去に1度は紹介している。 https://t.co/Wy9k3I7E69 https://t.co/xaBfJioYNp https://t.co/pBuFcYzgvl https://t.co/YmQEksg5fG
@Kevin_McKernan @klartext_blog @jjcouey And the Sirotkins... Apart from @Daoyu15 and @NestCommander were there any genuine people on that paper? JJ started posting unprovoked attacks on me now. I'd love to know what the deals were. https://t.co/HxpytLfnKW
https://t.co/MBRDxQ86bS Ik lees dit stuk nu voor de derde keer, voor het boek natuurlijk. Ik heb het voor de stukken al eerder gelezen, al begreep ik toen niet alles. Eigenlijk vind ik dit misschien nog wel de beste samenvatting van alle bijzondere kenmerken van #SARSCoV2 die
Reddit Madness, worse than a Wikipedia Slug Festival Censorship of a great "semi-#DRASTIC" Editorial: Should we discount the laboratory origin of COVID-19? https://t.co/WUOfSTDn5Z @Rossana38510044 @ydeigin @Harvard2H @MccairnDr @jjcouey @Daoyu15 https://t.co/ethCw3aNu0 https://t.co/gEHfJue8Ik
It's impossible. Read the papers by independent scientists who are not under the control of CCP. https://t.co/JY8XYyRKcQ https://t.co/rF3FNNfkcJ https://t.co/sffOP1k7iA https://t.co/pBuFcYzgvl https://t.co/K42ZOjIIJD
The authors did not simply focus on the possibility of a laboratory leak, but also investigated the other possibilities expressed in the China-WHO cross-examination (including the cold chain hypothesis). @Rossana38510044 @ydeigin @Daoyu15 https://t.co/96k60l3N1f
Understanding the origin of SARS-CoV-2 is critical for preventing future outbreaks. This video examines evidence surrounding its emergence and explores the possibility of zoonotic sources versus lab release while…
The origin of SARS-CoV-2 continues to be debated, with genetic features like the chimeric structure and furin cleavage site suggesting potential laboratory involvement. Understanding these aspects is key to preventing…
Recent articles from the New York Times and Wall Street Journal reignite the debate on COVID-19's origin, focusing on the lab leak theory and ongoing investigations into whether the virus escaped from a laboratory or…
This video investigates the origins of SARS-CoV-2, the virus behind the COVID-19 pandemic. It emphasizes the importance of understanding whether it originated from zoonotic sources or an accidental lab release to…
Today's article explores the debate over COVID-19's origin, including whether it resulted from a natural spillover or a lab incident. Ongoing investigations highlight the need for transparent scientific research to…
The debate over COVID-19's origin includes whether it resulted from natural spillover or a lab incident. Evidence and theories suggest potential lab escape, but definitive proof is lacking. Ongoing investigations…
@Pacanow @NSAGov @Pretoniusz @karmelsss Dzięki za link! Na PubMed jest https://t.co/bgOPJCZcEX. artykuł z 2021 r. "Should we discount the laboratory origin of COVID-19?" (Segreto et al., z D. i K. Sirotkinami), argumentujący za możliwością lab leak. Warto czytać, ale nowsze badania (np. Pekar 2022, Worobey 2022)
@DiseaseMarket @ProfKlase @EMM_386 @emilyakopp Note also the comment here. https://t.co/xM7nE2jWYs https://t.co/hwTJjKTvRd
@jjcouey You mean when DRASTIC forgot to tell us that there was a felon in there ready to be exposed out if the good guys revealed too much, and an anti-aging vaxophile ready to run interference if that didn't work? https://t.co/HxpytLePVo
RT @equal_ibrium: A question for those with relevant expertise/insight: Is it unusual that SARS-CoV-2 doesn't seem able to infect bats (at…
@USMortality @aya_velazquez @jhas5 https://t.co/igGpWj8vHC https://t.co/jKC4HyPED2
@1goodtern https://t.co/Fr48asKw4M
@Melchizedek1972 @GZzyzyx @paulwall1133 @DukeErdu_ @RickABright @FortuneMagazine @cbarbermd Sure, she should read this helpful manuscript, it has yet to be rebutted. https://t.co/makljIDFGP
RT @Jikkyleaks: @Kevin_McKernan @klartext_blog @jjcouey And the Sirotkins... Apart from @Daoyu15 and @NestCommander were there any genuine…
RT @Jikkyleaks: @Kevin_McKernan @klartext_blog @jjcouey And the Sirotkins... Apart from @Daoyu15 and @NestCommander were there any genuine…
RT @Jikkyleaks: @Kevin_McKernan @klartext_blog @jjcouey And the Sirotkins... Apart from @Daoyu15 and @NestCommander were there any genuine…
RT @Jikkyleaks: @Kevin_McKernan @klartext_blog @jjcouey And the Sirotkins... Apart from @Daoyu15 and @NestCommander were there any genuine…
RT @Jikkyleaks: @Kevin_McKernan @klartext_blog @jjcouey And the Sirotkins... Apart from @Daoyu15 and @NestCommander were there any genuine…
RT @Jikkyleaks: @Kevin_McKernan @klartext_blog @jjcouey And the Sirotkins... Apart from @Daoyu15 and @NestCommander were there any genuine…
RT @Jikkyleaks: @Kevin_McKernan @klartext_blog @jjcouey And the Sirotkins... Apart from @Daoyu15 and @NestCommander were there any genuine…
RT @Jikkyleaks: @Kevin_McKernan @klartext_blog @jjcouey And the Sirotkins... Apart from @Daoyu15 and @NestCommander were there any genuine…
RT @Jikkyleaks: @Kevin_McKernan @klartext_blog @jjcouey And the Sirotkins... Apart from @Daoyu15 and @NestCommander were there any genuine…
@Kevin_McKernan @klartext_blog @jjcouey And the Sirotkins... Apart from @Daoyu15 and @NestCommander were there any genuine people on that paper? JJ started posting unprovoked attacks on me now. I'd love to know what the deals were. https://t.co/HxpytLfnKW
@Nodeling1 @pizzapicklespur @DrKevinWMcCair1 @ENirenberg @origincanada @ayi_mayi @CharlesRixey @Parsifaler @jjcouey @BillyBostickson @DeinertDoc @fynn_fan @JCPEREZCODEX @JikkyKjj @Doctor_I_am_The @sailorrooscout @angie_rasmussen @wanderer_jasnah @AlexanderDent6 @stuartjdneil @macroliter @PeacockFlu @andrew_croxford @florian_krammer We called this early on so they had to change tack. Rosanna was the biggest proponent of the "it was a LAV" story along with Dan Sirotkin. Both from NCBI Karl Sirotkin's DRASTIC (of whom I only trust 2 contributors). https://t.co/HxpytLfnKW
@stoof023 @mjflepage https://t.co/5GO9QQPyer
@NickHudsonCT https://t.co/Q3eH4EdvSt
RT @john_bumblebee: https://t.co/MBRDxQ86bS Ik lees dit stuk nu voor de derde keer, voor het boek natuurlijk. Ik heb het voor de stukken a…
RT @john_bumblebee: https://t.co/MBRDxQ86bS Ik lees dit stuk nu voor de derde keer, voor het boek natuurlijk. Ik heb het voor de stukken a…
RT @john_bumblebee: https://t.co/MBRDxQ86bS Ik lees dit stuk nu voor de derde keer, voor het boek natuurlijk. Ik heb het voor de stukken a…
RT @john_bumblebee: https://t.co/MBRDxQ86bS Ik lees dit stuk nu voor de derde keer, voor het boek natuurlijk. Ik heb het voor de stukken a…
RT @john_bumblebee: https://t.co/MBRDxQ86bS Ik lees dit stuk nu voor de derde keer, voor het boek natuurlijk. Ik heb het voor de stukken a…
RT @john_bumblebee: https://t.co/MBRDxQ86bS Ik lees dit stuk nu voor de derde keer, voor het boek natuurlijk. Ik heb het voor de stukken a…
https://t.co/MBRDxQ86bS Ik lees dit stuk nu voor de derde keer, voor het boek natuurlijk. Ik heb het voor de stukken al eerder gelezen, al begreep ik toen niet alles. Eigenlijk vind ik dit misschien nog wel de beste samenvatting van alle bijzondere kenmerken van #SARSCoV2 die
RT @Jiwan_Ko_Pani: @_everythingism @ESYudkowsky Well, I don't know. There is definitely scientific data that at least suggests a lab leak.…
@_everythingism @ESYudkowsky Well, I don't know. There is definitely scientific data that at least suggests a lab leak. https://t.co/Q7Yd0lrKVi
@Bull_Detective @Bryce_Nickels See also. https://t.co/6lVUJ8Dhob
RT @Biorealism: @LSuperfriends @RepMcCormick @COVIDSelect The features of the virus are readily explained by known spillover studies on SAR…
@LSuperfriends @RepMcCormick @COVIDSelect The features of the virus are readily explained by known spillover studies on SARS-related bat coronaviruses the Wuhan Institute of Virology was undertaking. The nearest relatives are found in Yunnan and Laos, areas WIV sampled. https://t.co/6lVUJ8Dhob
@virologyanon @LSuperfriends @emilyakopp @DavidBahry One of several features of SARS-CoV-2 that are consistent with lab origin. Even before you consider WIV was part of a proposal to introduce FCS to novel SrCVs or that they sampled Yunnan and Laos where the nearest relatives are found. https://t.co/6lVUJ8Dhob
RT @NestCommander: @Roper_Lab @mdc_martinus @VaughnMises @R_H_Ebright @COVIDSelect @WHO You're way out your depth sweetheart, and here ther…
@Roper_Lab @mdc_martinus @VaughnMises @R_H_Ebright @COVIDSelect @WHO You're way out your depth sweetheart, and here there be monsters. https://t.co/makljIDFGP
RT @NestCommander: @PhilippMarkolin @R_H_Ebright I have published and called out the obvious academic fraud of virologists. https://t.co/m…
@PhilippMarkolin @R_H_Ebright I have published and called out the obvious academic fraud of virologists. https://t.co/makljIDFGP Here we are deconstructing their lies, word by word. https://t.co/gqLdd8i3r4 https://t.co/67lbHGfnnM Now what are you going to do, gob-shite? @CharlesRixey @Jikkyleaks
@gfodor @monano_rookie @jackbinswitch There is also the fact that there are people in his field (bioengineering) who have examined the virus and DO NOT discount a lab-engineered virus that escaped into the wild. There is a much research on this to topic: https://t.co/CIDEaII2Ti Such as: https://t.co/PLFdh2xnaK
@RemnantMd It wasn't gain of function, it was likely directed evolution. .. one of several fairly well-correlated bat coronaviruses could have been used in combination with directed evolution. https://t.co/NMJsSykjaM
@shellenberger Speculation '.. one of several fairly well-correlated bat coronaviruses could have been used in combination with directed evolution, a widely used technique for introducing mutations and selection to achieve proteins with desired properties https://t.co/NMJsSykjaM
@RogerPielkeJr Speculation '.. one of several fairly well-correlated bat coronaviruses could have been used in combination with directed evolution, a widely used technique for introducing mutations and selection to achieve proteins with desired properties https://t.co/NMJsSykjaM
RT @Biorealism: @CD57227 @loekalization @zasdak Another good paper on unusual features of SARS-CoV-2. Of course this was written before DEF…
@CD57227 @loekalization @zasdak Another good paper on unusual features of SARS-CoV-2. Of course this was written before DEFUSE came to light, which explains many of the features discussed. https://t.co/6lVUJ8Dhob
@dstefanos Should we discount the laboratory origin of COVID‑19? https://t.co/uA5F7VS4Ro
@Strikenstein @thisisnothappen @DH21422312 @YonathanAsmerom @SkepticJonGuy @DopplerEffect93 @ImmunoGangsta @DocDeezWhat @Heggzigu @BanFauxNews @LiedSuddenly @SpiritualAnark @DrKrisEdward @canceledmouse @thereal_truther @RealTruthMouse @TimTrippDesign @IanCopeland5 @weswilson @WesleyWilson Zoonosis was blown out the water long ago, by us! https://t.co/makljIDFGP Although I urged people to take precautions with masks as the pandemic started, the data is in, they don't work. https://t.co/9go37huXnP Any other fictive realities you would like picking apart?
@kenlipartito @kellywind @jgharris7 @dilanesper Wuhan Institute of Virology had hACE2 binding & humanized mouse infection with synthetic recombinant bat coronaviruses in 2019. Early adaptation to human ACE2 and poor binding to bats is consistent with this. Another paper that summarizes features of SC2. https://t.co/6lVUJ8Dhob
@CodeTheoryAlpha @BillyBostickson @netpoette @Bryce_Nickels @BiosafetyNow @R_H_Ebright Safe to say of the members of DRASTIC that wrote this paper I remain in close contact with the only two that I trust. At least three are acting on behalf of undisclosed entities. https://t.co/HxpytLfnKW
RT @Biorealism: @ggronvall @ValidScience @lawfareblog None have been seen in sarbecoviruses? The nearest relatives to SARS-CoV-2 are found…
@ggronvall @ValidScience @lawfareblog None have been seen in sarbecoviruses? The nearest relatives to SARS-CoV-2 are found in Yunnan and Laos where WIV sampled. A paper that discusses unusual features of the virus before the DEFUSE proposal to add FCS to novel SrCVs came to light. https://t.co/6lVUJ8Dhob
RT @Biorealism: @Rebecca21951651 @WashburneAlex @mbiojournal @mSphereJ @ASMicrobiology They could have mentioned some of the papers that ma…
@Rebecca21951651 @WashburneAlex @mbiojournal @mSphereJ @ASMicrobiology They could have mentioned some of the papers that make the case for lab origin scenario. Eg. https://t.co/43aaKKPs6v https://t.co/xj1WrGNJ7h
@JohnJonaut @WashburneAlex https://t.co/6lVUJ8Dhob https://t.co/DrgoiikfMU
RT @Biorealism: @atuntable @philipcball @mattwridley Still one of the best summaries of unusual features of the virus that raise the prospe…
I somehow missed this excellent technical summary by Segreto et. al. Should we discount the laboratory origin of COVID-19? https://t.co/jvrhfUrMgC
@atuntable @philipcball @mattwridley Still one of the best summaries of unusual features of the virus that raise the prospect of lab origin. https://t.co/06shzhQNDJ
@johnnyvento2 @TomFromTheGrave @BretWeinstein @neiltyson https://t.co/lAWbpgw8nK "All of these attributes would be very surprising if the virus had indeed jumped from an animal to a human for the first time in autumn 2019."
RT @hkakeya: この人はフーリン切断部位も知らずに新型コロナウイルスを語っていたのだろうか？AndersenのNature Medicine論文でも触れられている。なお、α株はフーリン切断部位のPRRAのPがHに、δ株はRに変異したことで感染力を増した。少しは論文を読…
@BobasoyNPC @WashburneAlex @ggronvall @JamieMetzl I would say many judges & juries would find it's more likely on balance of probabilities. This paper provides a nice overview of some of the features of the virus that suggest lab origin. This was before the DEFUSE proposal to add FCS to SrCVs was known. https://t.co/6lVUJ8Dhob
@Ambisense_CW @SHomburg Furin Spaltschnittstelle passgenau, ACE2 Rezeptor ready, Neuropilin Rezeptor ready... mnjaa, klingt nicht nach Zufall. Details, vorsichtig formuliert: https://t.co/6SjoO9Apxe https://t.co/5piGUVQNAu
@SciencePolitics I should clarify this was published August 2020 - which was the first at the time. A few others have been published since. This is an excellent one. https://t.co/06shzhyEpB
@jheathnb @Misha37067244 @GVDBossche https://t.co/oq7VvP2ydS https://t.co/KAzgrhp2HK
@BoetSchouwink Also humanized mice. https://t.co/6lVUJ8Ukqb
"unique feature of SARS-CoV-2 when compared to related coronaviruses is a longer loop containing the S1/S2 cleavage site.. at least four amino acids longer around the site containing the FCS than any other known Sarbecovirus." @ydeigin @Rossana38510044 https://t.co/qJ6PNHqCSP
122. https://t.co/LOvU1lhDXh
RT @SweenyFrank: For those asking me “what is the scientific evidence that supports a lab leak?” This analysis has held up quite well @Ross…
RT @SweenyFrank: For those asking me “what is the scientific evidence that supports a lab leak?” This analysis has held up quite well @Ross…
RT @SweenyFrank: For those asking me “what is the scientific evidence that supports a lab leak?” This analysis has held up quite well @Ross…
For those asking me “what is the scientific evidence that supports a lab leak?” This analysis has held up quite well @Rossana38510044 @ydeigin @humblesci https://t.co/nLcI7xEWFI
A question for those with relevant expertise/insight: Is it unusual that SARS-CoV-2 doesn't seem able to infect bats (at least not easily)? It infects humans, cats, dogs, tigers, apes, minks.. Sources: 1.https://t.co/kJBOW1u9wT 2.https://t.co/KR9yJ27okJ 3.https://t.co/4omM9Pd8WI https://t.co/uo95s9i6y3
@BluLineDC @exsibilation @mildanalyst @RomainMartinIO Reasons why we should not discount the laboratory origin of COVID-19 https://t.co/SaXUri2peC
RT @Biorealism: @tony_vandongen @ShakeTheCensor @VBruttel and @BiophysicsFL have separately indicated they might be putting their observati…
RT @Biorealism: @tony_vandongen @ShakeTheCensor @VBruttel and @BiophysicsFL have separately indicated they might be putting their observati…
https://t.co/PmlL7EI30h
RT @Biorealism: @tony_vandongen @ShakeTheCensor @VBruttel and @BiophysicsFL have separately indicated they might be putting their observati…
@tony_vandongen @ShakeTheCensor @VBruttel and @BiophysicsFL have separately indicated they might be putting their observations in a paper. One paper that raised some of the unusual features of SARS-CoV-2. You could approach someone like Neil L. Harrison, Bernd Kaina, D Baltimore? https://t.co/6lVUJ8Ukqb
@ydeigin and @Rossana38510044 refuted the glycans in Mar 2021: "No interaction of SARS-CoV-2 with a host immune system based on O-linked glycans can be claimed, and hence, this mechanism does not support the argument for natural evolution of SARS-CoV-2." https://t.co/TsxagTnLRA
RT @Biorealism: @jbkinney @gtuckerkellogg @PolyVinci It's largely fallen to academics on twitter like @BiophysicsFL or those outside major…
@jbkinney @gtuckerkellogg @PolyVinci It's largely fallen to academics on twitter like @BiophysicsFL or those outside major virology labs to discuss the various features of the virus that are suggestive of lab origin. Eg. https://t.co/6lVUJ8Ukqb
@stuartjdneil @SpyrosLytras Really great work by Spyros! Looking into the banal strains has also been very informative Along with this one from Segreto et al. Taken together they are really widening my perspective of the full picture
RT @Biorealism: Segreto, R., Deigin, Y., McCairn, K. et al. Should we discount the laboratory origin of COVID-19?. Environ Chem Lett 19, 27…
@SpyrosLytras This one describes the lab origin concerns in a newer paper that's more toned down
RT @Biorealism: Segreto, R., Deigin, Y., McCairn, K. et al. Should we discount the laboratory origin of COVID-19?. Environ Chem Lett 19, 27…
Segreto, R., Deigin, Y., McCairn, K. et al. Should we discount the laboratory origin of COVID-19?. Environ Chem Lett 19, 2743–2757 (2021).
RT @EnvChemLett: Should we discount the laboratory origin of COVID-19?There is a near-consensus view that severe acute respiratory syndrome…
RT @EnvChemLett: Should we discount the laboratory origin of COVID-19?There is a near-consensus view that severe acute respiratory syndrome…
@BiophysicsFL @atuntable @CT_Bergstrom @lab_leak @HansMahncke @USAwakeup1 @sciencecohen @ydeigin Reference. https://t.co/6lVUJ8Ukqb
https://t.co/iJq4n1vkT1
@wheezydoc Here’s the paper that really put the evidence supporting the lab leak hypothesis on the front burner for me: https://t.co/YZOyHHEahJ
@RandySchoenberg @EricRWeinstein Or the likes of @ydeigin @Ayjchan @stevenemassey. I'd read their comments or Louis Nemzer @BiophysicsFL to see things that tend to get left out. https://t.co/43aaKKxiSn
@robertson_lab @MJnanostretch It's similar but with some key differences in terms of the features of the virus which has driven much of the speculation about possible lab origin (aside from the lab proximity). https://t.co/43aaKKxiSn https://t.co/TcCq6shFe7
@OXHarryH1 https://t.co/bNzf0m4cOF
@carlzimmer https://t.co/4tbH16QkSV Beveridge's Law of Headlines: 'No'
@BA_is_BA @NPR @RandPaul @Ayjchan Thanks, yes they have appeared in other beta coronaviruses but not that subclass of sarbecovirus. It's possible though. @Rossana38510044 co-authored a paper that comments on that paper. There are a few other features of the site that seem consistent with https://t.co/43aaKKxiSn
@davidpgoldman Multiple anomalies in the SARS Coronavirus-2 Spike Glycoprotein: https://t.co/4tbH16QkSV
@MJnanostretch Dishonesty or negligence? I would have thought these papers would be fairly easy to find. Any other papers that you think best summarize the case for lab origin? https://t.co/BUxgRWOwX4 https://t.co/6lVUJ8CJyD
@KonProg @marcfriedrich7 @cicero_online @c_drosten Unbestreitbar? https://t.co/9qQqcYP1AJ
Good balanced piece https://t.co/5YsM3EBSXS
Should we discount the laboratory origin of COVID-19? https://t.co/dCn1xdGayb
@HamishDBG @JeremyFarrar @BBCr4today https://t.co/4tbH177nUV
Ach ja, da war was. Als ich noch dachte, es wäre wichtig zu wissen, woher der ganze Scheiß kommt: https://t.co/CNgGlOF3jI tl/dr: "SARS-COV2 hat mit großer Wahrscheinlichkeit KEINEN zoonotischen Ursprung" #COVID19at #impfpflichtjetzt #pflegteuchdochselbst https://t.co/F6JBugVrgN
RT @hkakeya: この人はフーリン切断部位も知らずに新型コロナウイルスを語っていたのだろうか？AndersenのNature Medicine論文でも触れられている。なお、α株はフーリン切断部位のPRRAのPがHに、δ株はRに変異したことで感染力を増した。少しは論文を読…
RT @hkakeya: この人はフーリン切断部位も知らずに新型コロナウイルスを語っていたのだろうか？AndersenのNature Medicine論文でも触れられている。なお、α株はフーリン切断部位のPRRAのPがHに、δ株はRに変異したことで感染力を増した。少しは論文を読…
RT @hkakeya: この人はフーリン切断部位も知らずに新型コロナウイルスを語っていたのだろうか？AndersenのNature Medicine論文でも触れられている。なお、α株はフーリン切断部位のPRRAのPがHに、δ株はRに変異したことで感染力を増した。少しは論文を読…
RT @hkakeya: この人はフーリン切断部位も知らずに新型コロナウイルスを語っていたのだろうか？AndersenのNature Medicine論文でも触れられている。なお、α株はフーリン切断部位のPRRAのPがHに、δ株はRに変異したことで感染力を増した。少しは論文を読…
RT @hkakeya: この人はフーリン切断部位も知らずに新型コロナウイルスを語っていたのだろうか？AndersenのNature Medicine論文でも触れられている。なお、α株はフーリン切断部位のPRRAのPがHに、δ株はRに変異したことで感染力を増した。少しは論文を読…
RT @hkakeya: この人はフーリン切断部位も知らずに新型コロナウイルスを語っていたのだろうか？AndersenのNature Medicine論文でも触れられている。なお、α株はフーリン切断部位のPRRAのPがHに、δ株はRに変異したことで感染力を増した。少しは論文を読…
RT @hkakeya: この人はフーリン切断部位も知らずに新型コロナウイルスを語っていたのだろうか？AndersenのNature Medicine論文でも触れられている。なお、α株はフーリン切断部位のPRRAのPがHに、δ株はRに変異したことで感染力を増した。少しは論文を読…
RT @hkakeya: この人はフーリン切断部位も知らずに新型コロナウイルスを語っていたのだろうか？AndersenのNature Medicine論文でも触れられている。なお、α株はフーリン切断部位のPRRAのPがHに、δ株はRに変異したことで感染力を増した。少しは論文を読…
RT @hkakeya: この人はフーリン切断部位も知らずに新型コロナウイルスを語っていたのだろうか？AndersenのNature Medicine論文でも触れられている。なお、α株はフーリン切断部位のPRRAのPがHに、δ株はRに変異したことで感染力を増した。少しは論文を読…
RT @hkakeya: この人はフーリン切断部位も知らずに新型コロナウイルスを語っていたのだろうか？AndersenのNature Medicine論文でも触れられている。なお、α株はフーリン切断部位のPRRAのPがHに、δ株はRに変異したことで感染力を増した。少しは論文を読…
RT @hkakeya: この人はフーリン切断部位も知らずに新型コロナウイルスを語っていたのだろうか？AndersenのNature Medicine論文でも触れられている。なお、α株はフーリン切断部位のPRRAのPがHに、δ株はRに変異したことで感染力を増した。少しは論文を読…
RT @hkakeya: この人はフーリン切断部位も知らずに新型コロナウイルスを語っていたのだろうか？AndersenのNature Medicine論文でも触れられている。なお、α株はフーリン切断部位のPRRAのPがHに、δ株はRに変異したことで感染力を増した。少しは論文を読…
RT @hkakeya: 本気で勉強する気があるなら、私が100本以上読んだ論文のうち、重要と思われる4つを紹介しよう。新型コロナウイルスの特徴を知る上で必須の論文。どれも過去に1度は紹介している。 https://t.co/Wy9k3I7E69 https://t.co/xa…
RT @hkakeya: 本気で勉強する気があるなら、私が100本以上読んだ論文のうち、重要と思われる4つを紹介しよう。新型コロナウイルスの特徴を知る上で必須の論文。どれも過去に1度は紹介している。 https://t.co/Wy9k3I7E69 https://t.co/xa…
RT @hkakeya: 本気で勉強する気があるなら、私が100本以上読んだ論文のうち、重要と思われる4つを紹介しよう。新型コロナウイルスの特徴を知る上で必須の論文。どれも過去に1度は紹介している。 https://t.co/Wy9k3I7E69 https://t.co/xa…
RT @hkakeya: 本気で勉強する気があるなら、私が100本以上読んだ論文のうち、重要と思われる4つを紹介しよう。新型コロナウイルスの特徴を知る上で必須の論文。どれも過去に1度は紹介している。 https://t.co/Wy9k3I7E69 https://t.co/xa…
RT @hkakeya: 本気で勉強する気があるなら、私が100本以上読んだ論文のうち、重要と思われる4つを紹介しよう。新型コロナウイルスの特徴を知る上で必須の論文。どれも過去に1度は紹介している。 https://t.co/Wy9k3I7E69 https://t.co/xa…
RT @hkakeya: 本気で勉強する気があるなら、私が100本以上読んだ論文のうち、重要と思われる4つを紹介しよう。新型コロナウイルスの特徴を知る上で必須の論文。どれも過去に1度は紹介している。 https://t.co/Wy9k3I7E69 https://t.co/xa…
RT @hkakeya: 本気で勉強する気があるなら、私が100本以上読んだ論文のうち、重要と思われる4つを紹介しよう。新型コロナウイルスの特徴を知る上で必須の論文。どれも過去に1度は紹介している。 https://t.co/Wy9k3I7E69 https://t.co/xa…
RT @hkakeya: 本気で勉強する気があるなら、私が100本以上読んだ論文のうち、重要と思われる4つを紹介しよう。新型コロナウイルスの特徴を知る上で必須の論文。どれも過去に1度は紹介している。 https://t.co/Wy9k3I7E69 https://t.co/xa…
本気で勉強する気があるなら、私が100本以上読んだ論文のうち、重要と思われる4つを紹介しよう。新型コロナウイルスの特徴を知る上で必須の論文。どれも過去に1度は紹介している。 https://t.co/Wy9k3I7E69 https://t.co/xaBfJioYNp https://t.co/pBuFcYzgvl https://t.co/YmQEksg5fG
@hiltzikm @quay_dr @jbloom_lab @WSJopinion @JamieMetzl *Segreto, R., Deigin, Y., McCairn, K. et al. Should we discount the laboratory origin of COVID-19?. Environ Chem Lett 19, 2743–2757 (2021). https://t.co/6lVUJ8Ukqb
--Should we discount the laboratory origin of COVID-19? https://t.co/TOpZRhh4hd
@mistahbuhau @ydeigin https://t.co/oIHkphttyH
25 March 2021 Should we discount the laboratory origin of COVID-19? https://t.co/x1fxVQkujm https://t.co/FRYEh5IKNu
@angie_rasmussen What is your stake in refusing the possibility of a lab leak @angie_rasmussen? What's with all that bias? Cars have safety features and still accidents happen. She just said she did not observe GoF. It's not like these experiments happen in big vats. https://t.co/wvMwrH3YPl
@lafemme_bambina @My2puppies1 @undergroundsar4 @JordanSchachtel @Fynnderella1 https://t.co/izXhtjXTG1
9up科學(粵)：科學角度分析實驗室泄漏說(20210607) https://t.co/iaF52OMrJS 來自 @YouTube https://t.co/y27sDCzOJo
Should we discount the laboratory origin of COVID-19? https://t.co/glI672YFF3
Should we discount the laboratory origin of COVID-19? https://t.co/8QNuK4B3RW
Should we discount the laboratory origin of COVID-19? https://t.co/qEgF2aN6Ou
RT @EnvChemLett: Should we discount the laboratory origin of COVID-19?There is a near-consensus view that severe acute respiratory syndrome…
RT @hkakeya: It's impossible. Read the papers by independent scientists who are not under the control of CCP. https://t.co/JY8XYyRKcQ https…
RT @EnvChemLett: Should we discount the laboratory origin of COVID-19?There is a near-consensus view that severe acute respiratory syndrome…
RT @hkakeya: It's impossible. Read the papers by independent scientists who are not under the control of CCP. https://t.co/JY8XYyRKcQ https…
RT @hkakeya: It's impossible. Read the papers by independent scientists who are not under the control of CCP. https://t.co/JY8XYyRKcQ https…
RT @hkakeya: It's impossible. Read the papers by independent scientists who are not under the control of CCP. https://t.co/JY8XYyRKcQ https…
RT @hkakeya: It's impossible. Read the papers by independent scientists who are not under the control of CCP. https://t.co/JY8XYyRKcQ https…
RT @hkakeya: It's impossible. Read the papers by independent scientists who are not under the control of CCP. https://t.co/JY8XYyRKcQ https…
RT @hkakeya: It's impossible. Read the papers by independent scientists who are not under the control of CCP. https://t.co/JY8XYyRKcQ https…
It's impossible. Read the papers by independent scientists who are not under the control of CCP. https://t.co/JY8XYyRKcQ https://t.co/rF3FNNfkcJ https://t.co/sffOP1k7iA https://t.co/pBuFcYzgvl https://t.co/K42ZOjIIJD
RT @FrancescoEsp33: The authors did not simply focus on the possibility of a laboratory leak, but also investigated the other possibilities…
RT @FrancescoEsp33: The authors did not simply focus on the possibility of a laboratory leak, but also investigated the other possibilities…
RT @FrancescoEsp33: The authors did not simply focus on the possibility of a laboratory leak, but also investigated the other possibilities…
RT @FrancescoEsp33: The authors did not simply focus on the possibility of a laboratory leak, but also investigated the other possibilities…
The authors did not simply focus on the possibility of a laboratory leak, but also investigated the other possibilities expressed in the China-WHO cross-examination (including the cold chain hypothesis). @Rossana38510044 @ydeigin @Daoyu15 https://t.co/96k60l3N1f
Should we discount the laboratory origin of COVID-19? - https://t.co/AsAb6ph2DE
Should we discount the laboratory origin of COVID-19? https://t.co/NsguFciqxP
RT @StatedClearly: In this video I look at the claims about COVID's origin made by evolutionary biologists @BretWeinstein & @HeatherEHeying…
RT @StatedClearly: In this video I look at the claims about COVID's origin made by evolutionary biologists @BretWeinstein & @HeatherEHeying…
140. Should we discount the laboratory origin of COVID-19? Updated - Published: 25 March 2021 @Rossana38510044 @ydeigin @MccairnDr @w_mccairn Alejandro Sousa @Harvard2H Karl Sirotkin @jjcouey Adrian Jones @Daoyu15 https://t.co/WUOfSTDn5Z
RT @StatedClearly: In this video I look at the claims about COVID's origin made by evolutionary biologists @BretWeinstein & @HeatherEHeying…
RT @StatedClearly: In this video I look at the claims about COVID's origin made by evolutionary biologists @BretWeinstein & @HeatherEHeying…
In this video I look at the claims about COVID's origin made by evolutionary biologists @BretWeinstein & @HeatherEHeying. https://t.co/8oaqPm5pvw Also, yup, I did just notice there is a typo on the opening slide. It's how I stay humble. @Friended4Ever @Rossana38510044
RT @BooreamFrancois: I have long wished there was a @RealClearNews kind of aggregator that pits article against article akin to: https://t.…
RT @EnvChemLett: Should we discount the laboratory origin of COVID-19?There is a near-consensus view that severe acute respiratory syndrome…
RT @EnvChemLett: Should we discount the laboratory origin of COVID-19?There is a near-consensus view that severe acute respiratory syndrome…
RT @BillyBostickson: Reddit Madness, worse than a Wikipedia Slug Festival Censorship of a great "semi-#DRASTIC" Editorial: Should we discou…
RT @BillyBostickson: Reddit Madness, worse than a Wikipedia Slug Festival Censorship of a great "semi-#DRASTIC" Editorial: Should we discou…
RT @BillyBostickson: Reddit Madness, worse than a Wikipedia Slug Festival Censorship of a great "semi-#DRASTIC" Editorial: Should we discou…
RT @BillyBostickson: Reddit Madness, worse than a Wikipedia Slug Festival Censorship of a great "semi-#DRASTIC" Editorial: Should we discou…
RT @BillyBostickson: Reddit Madness, worse than a Wikipedia Slug Festival Censorship of a great "semi-#DRASTIC" Editorial: Should we discou…
RT @BillyBostickson: Reddit Madness, worse than a Wikipedia Slug Festival Censorship of a great "semi-#DRASTIC" Editorial: Should we discou…
Latest Papers by D.R.A.S.T.I.C. Members Should we discount the laboratory origin of COVID-19? 1. Proposed Forensic Investigation of Wuhan Laboratories An Investigation into the WIV Databases that were Taken Offline https://t.co/wBNwuFRKa2
RT @BillyBostickson: Reddit Madness, worse than a Wikipedia Slug Festival Censorship of a great "semi-#DRASTIC" Editorial: Should we discou…
RT @BillyBostickson: Reddit Madness, worse than a Wikipedia Slug Festival Censorship of a great "semi-#DRASTIC" Editorial: Should we discou…
Reddit Madness, worse than a Wikipedia Slug Festival Censorship of a great "semi-#DRASTIC" Editorial: Should we discount the laboratory origin of COVID-19? https://t.co/WUOfSTDn5Z @Rossana38510044 @ydeigin @Harvard2H @MccairnDr @jjcouey @Daoyu15 https://t.co/ethCw3aNu0 https://t.co/gEHfJue8Ik
I have long wished there was a @RealClearNews kind of aggregator that pits article against article akin to: https://t.co/c3UrMG58cq vs. https://t.co/EJRvFJMgfZ
RT @EnvChemLett: Should we discount the laboratory origin of COVID-19?There is a near-consensus view that severe acute respiratory syndrome…