N Engl J Med May 2021 PMID 34010531

Final Report of a Trial of Intensive versus Standard Blood-Pressure Control.

Mentions

216
Peak: 119 in May 2021
across 6 sources since May 2021

Extended reach

3,065,609
potential audience

Total likes

24,344

Video views

1,758,528

Mentions per month

May 2021 – Nov 2025

Where it's discussed

  • X / Twitter172 posts
  • News28 articles
  • YouTube6 videos
  • Facebook5 posts
  • Blogs3 articles
  • Reddit2 posts

AI synopsis

What people are saying

Numerous discussions highlight the key findings of the trial, particularly the effectiveness of targeting systolic blood pressure below 120 mm Hg to reduce major cardiovascular events and all-cause mortality. Phrases like 'significantly lowered the risk' and 'critical implications for treatment' illustrate the urgency and relevance of the research, while comments addressing potential risks emphasize the need for cautious adoption of these findings.

AgreementModerate agreement

Most discussions indicate a positive reception towards the findings of the trial, with many acknowledging its significance.

InterestHigh interest

The majority of participants express high levels of curiosity about the trial's outcomes and implications for cardiovascular health.

EngagementModerate engagement

Many comments reference specific details about the trial, including the comparison between blood pressure targets and related health outcomes.

ImpactHigh impact

Poster perceives the study's conclusions as significantly impacting clinical practices in blood pressure management.

Abstract in brief

  • The trial involved 9,361 participants at risk for cardiovascular disease who were assigned either intensive treatment aiming for a systolic blood pressure of 120 mm Hg or standard treatment set at 140 mm Hg.
  • The results showed that the intensive treatment group had a lower rate of major cardiovascular events and all-cause mortality, with 177 events per year compared to 240 in the standard group, and a lower all-cause mortality rate of 106 versus 141.
  • However, there were more serious adverse events, such as hypotension and kidney issues, in the intensive treatment group, highlighting the need for cautious management.

Top posts

Most liked on X and Bluesky
日本循環器協会
@J_Circ_Assoc · X

「血圧140切ってるからセーフ! ふう

May 26, 2021 · 212 likes · 46 shares · 13,459 followers View post →
Dr. Tom Frieden
@DrTomFrieden · X

The SPRINT trial also showed that, despite more side effects, intensive blood pressure treatment to reach the lower blood pressure goal is safe – even in older people. Intensive treatment prevented more heart attacks, strokes and deaths. https://t.co/rNliSs9Pun 6/

May 21, 2021 · 89 likes · 31 shares · 237,451 followers View post →
Gregg Fonarow MD
@gcfmd · X

⬇️ HF risk with intensive SBP strategy Yet once trial ends, rapid rebound in HF risk in the post-intervention period when SBP control lessened HF HR 1.63, 95 CI 1.02-2.57 Final Report of a Trial of Intensive versus Standard Blood-Pressure Control | NEJM https://t.co/O0x5YqX4EI

May 20, 2021 · 30 likes · 6 shares · 11,835 followers View post →
Ethan J. Weiss
@ethanjweiss · X

You might think you had heard everything about SPRINT. You'd be wrong. Final Report of a Trial of Intensive versus Standard Blood-Pressure Control | NEJM https://t.co/667yqxFEMb

May 19, 2021 · 29 likes · 9 shares · 30,107 followers View post →
Henry Han
@HanCardiomd · X

Final Report of a SPRINT Trial of Intensive versus Standard Blood-Pressure Control https://t.co/owpaLDfaPX @NEJM @HyperAHA @ISHBP @AnastasiaSMihai @HTNCanada @JJheart_doc @AShchendrygina @DrMarthaGulati @SABOURETCardio @pabeda1 @MiguelCamafort https://t.co/ooFH71EhrT

May 25, 2021 · 26 likes · 10 shares · 16,114 followers View post →
Dr Brad Stanfield
@BradStanfieldMD · X

Scientists Just Found an EASY Way to Cut Dementia Risk By 15% https://t.co/Xfjw6BDudj

May 5, 2025 · 12 likes · 2 shares · 29,189 followers View post →

All mentions

Effective Exercise for Lowering Blood Pressure

This video discusses an effective exercise to lower blood pressure. High blood pressure increases the risk of heart attacks and strokes. Recent research highlights the importance of physical activity as a key ally in…

FalaLu! · Jan 30, 2025 340,571 views
Smart Meter RPM
@SmartMeterRPM · X

Results of a study (https://t.co/klNPvJHXHV) indicate patients at risk for cardiovascular events that targeted a systolic blood pressure (BP) of less than 120 mm Hg (intensive treatment) resulted in lower rates cardiovascular events. https://t.co/VTsfAsLw4s https://t.co/oU9dellvwe

Jul 10, 2025 · 1,078 followers View post →
Smart Meter RPM
@SmartMeterRPM · X

Results of a study (https://t.co/MAri8S2qWE) indicate patients at risk for cardiovascular events that targeted a systolic blood pressure (BP) of less than 120 mm Hg (intensive treatment) resulted in lower rates cardiovascular events. https://t.co/7PhuR1pIO5 https://t.co/1hGl79lHTV

May 27, 2025 · 1,078 followers View post →
L S
@LorenaShaw · X

RT @BradStanfieldMD: Scientists Just Found an EASY Way to Cut Dementia Risk By 15% https://t.co/Xfjw6BDudj

May 6, 2025 · 2 shares · 701 followers View post →
DaRocDok.com®
@DaRocDok · X

Scientists Just Found an EASY Way to Cut Dementia Risk By 15% https://t.co/x4Z5P5gWzo via @YouTube

May 6, 2025 · 1,517 followers View post →
cardinalgogo
@cardinalgogo · X

Scientists Just Found an EASY Way to Cut Dementia Risk By 15% https://t.co/HUKOM0PC9n via @YouTube @ifdadwashere @IfDadWasHere1

May 5, 2025 · 81 followers View post →
Essentials by Nature
@essentialnature · X

RT @BradStanfieldMD: Scientists Just Found an EASY Way to Cut Dementia Risk By 15% https://t.co/Xfjw6BDudj

May 5, 2025 · 2 shares · 627 followers View post →
Dr Brad Stanfield
@BradStanfieldMD · X

Scientists Just Found an EASY Way to Cut Dementia Risk By 15% https://t.co/Xfjw6BDudj

May 5, 2025 · 12 likes · 2 shares · 29,189 followers View post →
Edward
@EdwardS75827991 · X

This Exercise Clears Plaque in Your Arteries! New Trial https://t.co/HNR4AML9Ep via @YouTube

Feb 23, 2025 · 220 followers View post →
Luciana Haddad
@lucianabphaddad · X

O MELHOR EXERCÍCIO PARA BAIXAR A PRESSÃO ARTERIAL https://t.co/jqFBuPhDGM via @YouTube

Jan 30, 2025 · 590 followers View post →
#HelpYouGetGAINS
@helpYOUgetGAINS · X

RT @MichaelHen26343: This Exercise Clears Plaque in Your Arteries! New Trial https://t.co/3MvlMTguDP via @YouTube https://t.co/s1RbysHPlM

Jan 4, 2025 · 1 share · 16,884 followers View post →
Michael Henry
@MichaelHen26343 · X

This Exercise Clears Plaque in Your Arteries! New Trial https://t.co/3MvlMTguDP via @YouTube https://t.co/s1RbysHPlM

Jan 4, 2025 · 1 like · 1 share · 83 followers View post →
(((JReuben1)))
@jreuben1 · X

Clearing plaque from your arteries https://t.co/eu79MGYPKB

Dec 31, 2024 · 1,957 followers View post →
DaRocDok.com®
@DaRocDok · X

This Exercise Clears Plaque in Your Arteries! New Trial https://t.co/0bo8MIYvvF via @YouTube

Nov 27, 2024 · 1,517 followers View post →
We build We own
@towerace1231 · X

https://t.co/JXrVzVWvjV

Nov 26, 2024 · 13,990 followers View post →
Architect Neo
@Neo1Architect · X

https://t.co/KcgvMHES3o

Sep 11, 2024 · 1 like · 447 followers View post →
David Webber
@DavidWebbe85396 · X

RT @DoctorTro: https://t.co/gWGP8HmkN9

Sep 4, 2024 · 3 shares · 5 followers View post →
joe
@vintage_worlds · X

RT @DoctorTro: https://t.co/gWGP8HmkN9

Aug 31, 2024 · 3 shares · 364 followers View post →
DoctorTro
@DoctorTro · X

https://t.co/gWGP8HmkN9

Aug 31, 2024 · 10 likes · 3 shares · 161,231 followers View post →
DoctorTro
@DoctorTro · X

@PierreKory @MidwesternDoc https://t.co/gWGP8HmkN9

Aug 31, 2024 · 4 likes · 161,231 followers View post →
masa 薬剤師
@MasahideOr66774 · X

@Brain24Gd9144 例えば 高齢者高血圧患者のSPRINT試験では 血圧を ・140mmHgまで下げた患者(標準)と ・120mmHgまで下げた患者(厳格) の心筋梗塞や脳卒中、心不全発症を検討。 降圧剤で120mmHgまで下げても初期の心筋梗塞や脳卒中の増加は認められず更に25%減少しています!! https://t.co/q9NpMKVfCi https://t.co/ib3bYiMcU2

Jul 28, 2024 · 40 followers View post →
masa 薬剤師
@MasahideOr66774 · X

@Brain24Gd9144 例えば 高齢者高血圧患者の 血圧を ・140mmHgまで下げた患者(標準)と ・120mmHgまで下げた患者(厳格) の心筋梗塞や脳卒中、心不全発症を検討したSPRINT試験では 降圧剤で120mmHgまで下げても初期の心筋梗塞や脳卒中の増加は認められず更に25%減少しています!! https://t.co/q9NpMKVfCi https://t.co/wkssl7gPVU

Jul 28, 2024 · 40 followers View post →
Ahmed Mohsen
@drahmedmohsen85 · X

RT @cardiomet_CE: 14) Do note that #SPRINT excluded patients with #T2D and #proteinuria ≥1 g/day. Intensive treatment ⬇️ #CV outcomes but h…

Mar 14, 2023 · 1 share · 22,922 followers View post →
cardio-met
@cardiomet_CE · X

14) Do note that #SPRINT excluded patients with #T2D and #proteinuria ≥1 g/day. Intensive treatment ⬇️ #CV outcomes but had little effect on #kidney outcomes.

Mar 14, 2023 · 5 likes · 1 share · 4,158 followers View post →
Ethan J. Weiss
@ethanjweiss · X

@DrAdamBat @nntaleb There is also this https://t.co/Nf78u21bHe and... this https://t.co/571LBxxdJQ

Jan 12, 2023 · 3 likes · 30,107 followers View post →
soda_troubles,https://med-mastodon.com/@haysam
@set_fortess · X

RT @ckd_ce: 14) Do note that #SPRINT excluded patients with #T2D and #proteinuria ≥1 g/day. Intensive treatment ⬇️ #CV outcomes but had lit…

Jan 11, 2023 · 1 share · 2,548 followers View post →
@CKD_ce
@ckd_ce · X

14) Do note that #SPRINT excluded patients with #T2D and #proteinuria ≥1 g/day. Intensive treatment ⬇️ #CV outcomes but had little effect on #kidney outcomes.

Jan 10, 2023 · 4 likes · 1 share · 2,635 followers View post →
James Pirruccello
@jpirruccello · X

@eemoin SPRINT away from those answer choices. https://t.co/1sEECHx1Uj

Jul 9, 2022 · 9 likes · 3,336 followers View post →
Fizz-DI@比較と使い分け-KOJIMA Yushi
@Fizz_DI · X

ハイリスク患者に対する厳格な降圧治療(SBP<120)は、通常の降圧治療(SBP<140)よりも心筋梗塞や脳卒中を減らす(1.77%/年 vs 2.40%/年:HR=0.73 [95%CI: 0.63-0.86])が、低血圧や失神・急性腎障害の有害事象も多い。 N Engl J Med.384(20):1921-30,(2021) PMID: 34010531 https://t.co/5Z3bwfREbl

May 10, 2022 · 9 likes · 34,409 followers View post →
日本循環器学会 情報広報部会
@JCIRC_IPR · X

RT @uni_pharmacist: SPRINTのfinal reportでも、1年通常コントロールに戻しただけで心不全は2.3倍! Final Report of a Trial of Intensive versus Standard Blood-Pressure Co…

Mar 11, 2022 · 1 share · 22,065 followers View post →
unimusashi(N. Ashikawa)
@uni_pharmacist · X

SPRINTのfinal reportでも、1年通常コントロールに戻しただけで心不全は2.3倍! Final Report of a Trial of Intensive versus Standard Blood-Pressure Control https://t.co/lCOPdqImd0

Mar 11, 2022 · 6 likes · 1 share · 1,334 followers View post →
pon
@pon05209264 · X

RT @J_Circ_Assoc: 「血圧140切ってるからセーフ! ふう

Jan 18, 2022 · 46 shares · 123 followers View post →
epibot
@epi_twit · X

RT @WakeBDS: Among patients at increased cardiovascular risk, targeting a SBP of less than 120 mm Hg (vs. less than 140 mm HG) resulted in…

Jan 16, 2022 · 1 share · 3,133 followers View post →
Wake Forest Biostatistics & Data Science
@WakeBDS · X

Among patients at increased cardiovascular risk, targeting a SBP of less than 120 mm Hg (vs. less than 140 mm HG) resulted in lower rates of major adverse cardiovascular events. #PHSTop10 #epitwitter Congrats to @wambrosius and @dmrebouss from BDS! https://t.co/1nPDD6OcB7

Jan 16, 2022 · 5 likes · 1 share · 330 followers View post →
Dr. Michael Alexander
@MichaelAlexandp · X

Final Report of a Trial of Intensive versus Standard Blood-Pressure Control | NEJM https://t.co/sUPtl7988l

Oct 21, 2021 · 845 followers View post →
鯵ゼミ_Journal Club
@AJSR_since2005 · X

#062 Final Report of a Trial of Intensive versus Standard Blood-Pressure Control N Engl J Med 2021;384:1921-30. SPRINT最終結果 140未満よりも120未満の方が、やはりいいのか

Sep 11, 2021 · 6 followers View post →
AJMOpen
@AjmOpen · X

New study shows F/U Sprint confirms benefits of sBP <120 (MI, HF, and CV death but not stroke); Was increase in sBP after trial due to adjusting meds causing syncope/hypotension? @NEJM https://t.co/amXljG4ElJ #target_BP #systolic #bloodpressure

Jun 23, 2021 · 19 followers View post →
Manuel Gracián
@ManuelGracian · X

Final Report of a Trial of Intensive versus Standard Blood-Pressure Control - PubMed https://t.co/BYhPqO9Hov

Jun 15, 2021 · 3,136 followers View post →
Talgat
@TalgatYessenov · X

RT @AkhmetzhanG: Final Report of a Trial of Intensive versus Standard Blood-Pressure Control | NEJM https://t.co/0zbfp3BxXC @IJCHypertensi…

Jun 11, 2021 · 2 shares · 950 followers View post →
Dr. Perez-Belmonte
@belmonte_dr · X

RT @AkhmetzhanG: Final Report of a Trial of Intensive versus Standard Blood-Pressure Control | NEJM https://t.co/0zbfp3BxXC @IJCHypertensi…

Jun 11, 2021 · 2 shares · 149 followers View post →
Akhmetzhan Galimzhanov
@AkhmetzhanG · X

Final Report of a Trial of Intensive versus Standard Blood-Pressure Control | NEJM https://t.co/0zbfp3BxXC @IJCHypertension @ESHypertension @ISHBP @MiguelCamafort @AnastasiaSMihai #cardiotwitter #hypertension

Jun 11, 2021 · 8 likes · 2 shares · 806 followers View post →
Alosa Health
@AlosaHealth · X

3-year follow-up from the SPRINT trial shows that targeting a SBP<120mmHg led to a lower risk of major adverse #CV events and all-cause mortality compared with SBP<140mmHg but higher rates of some adverse events. @NEJM https://t.co/caInp7nlCE

Jun 11, 2021 · 1 like · 251 followers View post →
Gonz Pacheco
@GonzP04 · X

Según un artículo reciente publicado en el NEJM (Final Report of a Trial of Intensive versus Standard Blood-Pressure Control) metas de presión sistólica <120 mmHg en comparación con la meta tradicional de <140 mmHg se asocia con menos eventos cardiovasculares y menor mortalidad https://t.co/3UTe7lFEpM

Jun 11, 2021 · 12 likes · 301 followers View post →
Sarah Melville
@sarahkmels · X

RT @pecoitsfilho: @hswapnil @HecmagsMD @CharlieTomson @goKDIGO @GregKnoll99 @cellotonelli @taraichang https://t.co/MgZpyKcrPW, when when th…

Jun 8, 2021 · 1 share · 2,174 followers View post →
Roberto Pecoits-Filho
@pecoitsfilho · X

@hswapnil @HecmagsMD @CharlieTomson @goKDIGO @GregKnoll99 @cellotonelli @taraichang https://t.co/MgZpyKcrPW, when when they do, they do it again and again #NephJC

Jun 8, 2021 · 3 likes · 1 share · 1,421 followers View post →
Angela Wang
@aymwanghkuhk · X

Final Report of a Trial of Intensive versus Standard Blood-Pressure Control | NEJM https://t.co/c23MvtTMsv

Jun 8, 2021 · 836 followers View post →
Tae-Hwa Chun, MD, PhD
@taehwachun · X

Final Report of a Trial of Intensive versus Standard Blood-Pressure Control | NEJM https://t.co/FOpYFWiXop

Jun 8, 2021 · 158 followers View post →
Katie Cho, PharmD, BCACP (she/her/hers)
@letsgetrenal · X

Let's put that in context of the final results from #SPRINT too! https://t.co/aoxep2PdMp

Jun 7, 2021 · 188 followers View post →
Brandon Yan, MD MPH
@BYan415 · X

Should we be more aggressive with #BloodPressure control? SPRINT trial: Controlling SBP<120 vs <140 reduced annual risk of MI/ACS/stroke/acute HF/death by 27% and all-cause mortality by 25%. Although, some adverse events more frequent. It seems yes. https://t.co/unabMb08nH

Jun 5, 2021 · 3 likes · 528 followers View post →
Hirotsugu Kitayama
@HirotsuguKitay1 · X

RT @ASPNeph: Final Report of a Trial of Intensive versus Standard Blood-Pressure Control https://t.co/52YjDaVxxz @NEJM #BP #SPRINT

Jun 4, 2021 · 1 share · 172 followers View post →
American Society of Pediatric Nephrology
@ASPNeph · X

Final Report of a Trial of Intensive versus Standard Blood-Pressure Control https://t.co/52YjDaVxxz @NEJM #BP #SPRINT

Jun 4, 2021 · 1 like · 1 share · 10,139 followers View post →
Amy Compton-Phillips, MD
@amyleecp3 · X

Buried in the ongoing news cycle this May is the insightful and essential SPRINT trial. Getting systolic #bloodpressure (the top number) from the usual target of 140 down to 120 significantly lowered the risk of heart attacks and stroke. Know your numbers. https://t.co/sbUDu5N9vu

Jun 3, 2021 · 1 share · 1,951 followers View post →
Biofourmis
@biofourmis · X

Aggressive blood pressure management (carried out with the help of #DigitalTherapeutics) is associated with better cardiovascular outcomes than taking a more traditional approach, according to new findings published in @NEJM. https://t.co/syxe0AYgab | #HeartFailure

Jun 2, 2021 · 2 likes · 1 share · 1,275 followers View post →
でこぽにゃ
@seamarsun · X

RT @J_Circ_Assoc: 「血圧140切ってるからセーフ! ふう

Jun 2, 2021 · 46 shares · 24 followers View post →
Ash Paul
@pash22 · X

RT @ethanjweiss: You might think you had heard everything about SPRINT. You'd be wrong. Final Report of a Trial of Intensive versus Standa…

May 29, 2021 · 9 shares · 32,274 followers View post →
Heather L Gornik
@heatherlgornik · X

RT @MRrenaldoc: Lower is still better! https://t.co/0ScBRyXeHB

May 29, 2021 · 5 shares · 4,341 followers View post →
Anatoly Zhirkov/Жирков Анатолий
@AnaZhirkov · X

Final Report of a Trial of Intensive versus Standard Blood-Pressure Control | NEJM https://t.co/1fOHOU1PvB Important study, but the conclusions are ambiguous.

May 29, 2021 · 23 followers View post →
ハトミルさん
@hatomiru · X

RT @J_Circ_Assoc: 「血圧140切ってるからセーフ! ふう

May 28, 2021 · 46 shares · 115 followers View post →
Hokyou Lee, MD, PhD, FAHA
@hokyoulee · X

RT @HanCardiomd: Final Report of a SPRINT Trial of Intensive versus Standard Blood-Pressure Control https://t.co/owpaLDfaPX @NEJM @HyperAHA…

May 28, 2021 · 10 shares · 252 followers View post →
Ahmet Tas
@ahmettascor · X

https://t.co/Bg7QW4WHdy

May 28, 2021 · 2 likes · 792 followers View post →
.┓┏.
@whisperofgecko · X

RT @J_Circ_Assoc: 「血圧140切ってるからセーフ! ふう

May 28, 2021 · 46 shares · 198 followers View post →
T.kimura
@jjcrazydiamond · X

RT @J_Circ_Assoc: 「血圧140切ってるからセーフ! ふう

May 28, 2021 · 46 shares · 1,365 followers View post →
青島周一@【書籍】「生成AIと学ぶ医学論文の読み方・考え方」発売中!
@syuichiao89 · X

Final Report of a Trial of Intensive versus Standard Blood-Pressure Control https://t.co/V6a1yHiuH4

May 28, 2021 · 1 like · 8,610 followers View post →
Pamera
@Pamera60151815 · X

RT @J_Circ_Assoc: 「血圧140切ってるからセーフ! ふう

May 28, 2021 · 46 shares · 122 followers View post →
Alfredo Poleo
@apoleo · X

Final Report of a Trial of Intensive versus Standard Blood-Pressure Control | NEJM https://t.co/1Jo6HxusUu

May 27, 2021 · 542 followers View post →
Samir
@aumasamir · X

RT @SeguraCardio:

May 27, 2021 · 1 share · 26 followers View post →
Nyton
@nyton_ · X

RT @J_Circ_Assoc: 「血圧140切ってるからセーフ! ふう

May 27, 2021 · 46 shares · 258 followers View post →
銀樹
@MariGIN25 · X

RT @J_Circ_Assoc: 「血圧140切ってるからセーフ! ふう

May 27, 2021 · 46 shares · 295 followers View post →
休眠アカウント
@Biollante_1989 · X

RT @J_Circ_Assoc: 「血圧140切ってるからセーフ! ふう

May 27, 2021 · 46 shares · 2,198 followers View post →
上白石粗茶
@sochany · X

RT @J_Circ_Assoc: 「血圧140切ってるからセーフ! ふう

May 27, 2021 · 46 shares · 386 followers View post →
ウハクリニックまで何年かかるのだろう
@keitan0628 · X

RT @J_Circ_Assoc: 「血圧140切ってるからセーフ! ふう

May 27, 2021 · 46 shares · 371 followers View post →
パン焦がし薬剤師(やっちゃん)@牡丹山薬局
@yo_ishii_2021 · X

Final Report of a Trial of Intensive versus Standard Blood-Pressure Control https://t.co/ZDQOW49s9z

May 27, 2021 · 2,319 followers View post →
hataboSAN
@hataboSAN · X

RT @J_Circ_Assoc: 「血圧140切ってるからセーフ! ふう

May 27, 2021 · 46 shares · 999 followers View post →
ねいびー
@asareizi0000 · X

RT @J_Circ_Assoc: 「血圧140切ってるからセーフ! ふう

May 27, 2021 · 46 shares · 37 followers View post →
ととろ
@new_totoro · X

RT @J_Circ_Assoc: 「血圧140切ってるからセーフ! ふう

May 27, 2021 · 46 shares · 592 followers View post →
RadiOncBOTjp
@RadiOncBOTjp · X

RT @J_Circ_Assoc: 「血圧140切ってるからセーフ! ふう

May 27, 2021 · 46 shares · 642 followers View post →
m@ry
@19thMarchmari · X

RT @J_Circ_Assoc: 「血圧140切ってるからセーフ! ふう

May 27, 2021 · 46 shares · 109 followers View post →
感染症情報ひろば
@hashika_measles · X

RT @J_Circ_Assoc: 「血圧140切ってるからセーフ! ふう

May 27, 2021 · 46 shares · 3,602 followers View post →
吉田晃三
@kozoyoshida · X

RT @J_Circ_Assoc: 「血圧140切ってるからセーフ! ふう

May 27, 2021 · 46 shares · 3,499 followers View post →
おすし
@wB6eSr5dxu5sTFj · X

RT @J_Circ_Assoc: 「血圧140切ってるからセーフ! ふう

May 27, 2021 · 46 shares · 226 followers View post →
chill
@chill79392295 · X

RT @J_Circ_Assoc: 「血圧140切ってるからセーフ! ふう

May 27, 2021 · 46 shares · 358 followers View post →
co
@co48466745 · X

RT @J_Circ_Assoc: 「血圧140切ってるからセーフ! ふう

May 27, 2021 · 46 shares · 311 followers View post →
ほしゃか@臥床欲
@hoshaka · X

RT @J_Circ_Assoc: 「血圧140切ってるからセーフ! ふう

May 26, 2021 · 46 shares · 179 followers View post →
たーー
@FNt1UpCfUH7rFNm · X

RT @J_Circ_Assoc: 「血圧140切ってるからセーフ! ふう

May 26, 2021 · 46 shares · 220 followers View post →
ShingoMatsumoto
@CardioSM · X

RT @J_Circ_Assoc: 「血圧140切ってるからセーフ! ふう

May 26, 2021 · 46 shares · 1,994 followers View post →
星狩り@Tonberry❖
@GoingMyWay2003 · X

RT @J_Circ_Assoc: 「血圧140切ってるからセーフ! ふう

May 26, 2021 · 46 shares · 514 followers View post →
でぃ
@LasalleKodama · X

RT @J_Circ_Assoc: 「血圧140切ってるからセーフ! ふう

May 26, 2021 · 46 shares · 1,496 followers View post →
藤田 英雄
@cardiologICT · X

RT @J_Circ_Assoc: 「血圧140切ってるからセーフ! ふう

May 26, 2021 · 46 shares · 294 followers View post →
YG研究会
@ogatakiya · X

RT @J_Circ_Assoc: 「血圧140切ってるからセーフ! ふう

May 26, 2021 · 46 shares · 4,629 followers View post →
yumi☆15
@3_9210 · X

RT @J_Circ_Assoc: 「血圧140切ってるからセーフ! ふう

May 26, 2021 · 46 shares · 324 followers View post →
DII
@cryptoastrolabe · X

RT @J_Circ_Assoc: 「血圧140切ってるからセーフ! ふう

May 26, 2021 · 46 shares · 235 followers View post →
YOKO
@hi40chan1 · X

RT @J_Circ_Assoc: 「血圧140切ってるからセーフ! ふう

May 26, 2021 · 46 shares · 895 followers View post →
柴田啓佑 循環器内科
@taora_bokujun · X

RT @J_Circ_Assoc: 「血圧140切ってるからセーフ! ふう

May 26, 2021 · 46 shares · 838 followers View post →
日本循環器学会 情報広報部会
@JCIRC_IPR · X

RT @J_Circ_Assoc: 「血圧140切ってるからセーフ! ふう

May 26, 2021 · 46 shares · 22,065 followers View post →
Kazuyuki-Kominami@Cardiac Reha&Prevention
@KazzKomi · X

血圧は低めにコントロール!! Final Report of a Trial of Intensive versus Standard Blood-Pressure Control | NEJM https://t.co/Lg50BhvOu5

May 26, 2021 · 404 followers View post →
とろぴ
@7126_12856221_ · X

RT @J_Circ_Assoc: 「血圧140切ってるからセーフ! ふう

May 26, 2021 · 46 shares · 873 followers View post →
なを
@naonao0911 · X

RT @J_Circ_Assoc: 「血圧140切ってるからセーフ! ふう

May 26, 2021 · 46 shares · 615 followers View post →
KenG
@KenG619 · X

RT @J_Circ_Assoc: 「血圧140切ってるからセーフ! ふう

May 26, 2021 · 46 shares · 122 followers View post →
Takuya Kishi @ねこ好き循環器内科医
@tkishi_cardiol · X

RT @J_Circ_Assoc: 「血圧140切ってるからセーフ! ふう

May 26, 2021 · 46 shares · 14,699 followers View post →
循環器記事エビデンスメモ
@3333333fr · X

https://t.co/mEocICPDwi

May 26, 2021 · 9 followers View post →
Hiroyuki Sato 佐藤宏行
@foreverhero0819 · X

RT @J_Circ_Assoc: 「血圧140切ってるからセーフ! ふう

May 26, 2021 · 46 shares · 3,799 followers View post →
Diego Chambergo-Michilot, MD
@DiegoMichilot · X

RT @HanCardiomd: Final Report of a SPRINT Trial of Intensive versus Standard Blood-Pressure Control https://t.co/owpaLDfaPX @NEJM @HyperAHA…

May 26, 2021 · 10 shares · 444 followers View post →
Mari Ishida
@8TqVAR24G6B1c5v · X

RT @J_Circ_Assoc: 「血圧140切ってるからセーフ! ふう

May 26, 2021 · 46 shares · 540 followers View post →
Stephen Juraschek MD, PhD, FAHA, AHSCP-CHS
@spjuraschek · X

What an amazing run...I sense humor in "final" given all the research still likely to come from this data resource. Final Report of a Trial of Intensive versus Standard Blood-Pressure Control | NEJM https://t.co/AxRtbvY1BD

May 26, 2021 · 7 likes · 2,659 followers View post →
Đạt Nguyễn Đình
@DATDinhNguyen · X

RT @HanCardiomd: Final Report of a SPRINT Trial of Intensive versus Standard Blood-Pressure Control https://t.co/owpaLDfaPX @NEJM @HyperAHA…

May 26, 2021 · 10 shares · 218 followers View post →
向日葵
@himawari_nonatu · X

RT @J_Circ_Assoc: 「血圧140切ってるからセーフ! ふう

May 26, 2021 · 46 shares · 188 followers View post →
日本循環器協会
@J_Circ_Assoc · X

「血圧140切ってるからセーフ! ふう

May 26, 2021 · 212 likes · 46 shares · 13,459 followers View post →
Diego Segura-Rodríguez
@SeguraCardio · X

May 26, 2021 · 1 share · 25,778 followers View post →
Communications Medicine
@CommsMedicine · X

SPRINT trial reports that intensive treatment to lower blood pressure results in fewer major #cardiovascular events and decreased all-cause mortality vs. standard treatment | @NEJM https://t.co/UlyAjds0fA

May 26, 2021 · 2 likes · 1,501 followers View post →
د. أسامة خان Dr. Osama Khan
@drOsamaD · X

الأشخاص الذين لديهم خطورة أكبر لأمراض القلب، فإن ضبط #ضغط_الدم بما دون ١٢٠، نتج عنه نسبة مستقبلية أقل لمضاعفات ووفيات القلب، مقارنة بالأشخاص الذين تم ضبط ضغطهم بما دون ١٤٠ بالتأكيد الأعراض الجانبية للأدوية كانت أكثر لدى الأشخاص الذين تم ضبط الضغط دون ١٢٠ https://t.co/TptUU7rbpI

May 26, 2021 · 3,037 followers View post →
Dr. ViveK Nuktey
@NukteVivek · X

RT @HanCardiomd: Final Report of a SPRINT Trial of Intensive versus Standard Blood-Pressure Control https://t.co/owpaLDfaPX @NEJM @HyperAHA…

May 25, 2021 · 10 shares · 600 followers View post →
Djreys
@Djreys2 · X

RT @HanCardiomd: Final Report of a SPRINT Trial of Intensive versus Standard Blood-Pressure Control https://t.co/owpaLDfaPX @NEJM @HyperAHA…

May 25, 2021 · 10 shares · 109 followers View post →
champ_wayne
@champ_wayne · X

RT @HanCardiomd: Final Report of a SPRINT Trial of Intensive versus Standard Blood-Pressure Control https://t.co/owpaLDfaPX @NEJM @HyperAHA…

May 25, 2021 · 10 shares · 1,658 followers View post →
Elliott Guerrero
@DoctorElliottBG · X

Final Report of a Trial of Intensive versus Standard Blood-Pressure Control https://t.co/wxMvo52dP8

May 25, 2021 · 43 followers View post →
Eduardo Enriquez
@EnriquezEdwardo · X

RT @HanCardiomd: Final Report of a SPRINT Trial of Intensive versus Standard Blood-Pressure Control https://t.co/owpaLDfaPX @NEJM @HyperAHA…

May 25, 2021 · 10 shares · 759 followers View post →
Ирина Баринова
@DAZy81 · X

RT @HanCardiomd: Final Report of a SPRINT Trial of Intensive versus Standard Blood-Pressure Control https://t.co/owpaLDfaPX @NEJM @HyperAHA…

May 25, 2021 · 10 shares · 34 followers View post →
Nikolay Novitskiy
@novitskiynic · X

RT @HanCardiomd: Final Report of a SPRINT Trial of Intensive versus Standard Blood-Pressure Control https://t.co/owpaLDfaPX @NEJM @HyperAHA…

May 25, 2021 · 10 shares · 2,433 followers View post →
Dr. Martha Gulati ♥️
@DrMarthaGulati · X

RT @HanCardiomd: Final Report of a SPRINT Trial of Intensive versus Standard Blood-Pressure Control https://t.co/owpaLDfaPX @NEJM @HyperAHA…

May 25, 2021 · 10 shares · 64,778 followers View post →
Henry Han
@HanCardiomd · X

Final Report of a SPRINT Trial of Intensive versus Standard Blood-Pressure Control https://t.co/owpaLDfaPX @NEJM @HyperAHA @ISHBP @AnastasiaSMihai @HTNCanada @JJheart_doc @AShchendrygina @DrMarthaGulati @SABOURETCardio @pabeda1 @MiguelCamafort https://t.co/ooFH71EhrT

May 25, 2021 · 26 likes · 10 shares · 16,114 followers View post →
shingari
@shingari9 · X

入院患者の血圧指示でsBP<120っていう指示を何気なく出してたけど、心血管リスクがある患者には意外と意味のある指示なのかも https://t.co/dqMXGQ4vGy

May 25, 2021 · 9 followers View post →
Rick Young
@rickyoung66 · X

RT @drjkahn: Important and Hard to Achieve! Final Report of a Trial of Intensive versus Standard Blood-Pressure Control | NEJM https://t.c…

May 25, 2021 · 1 share · 1,184 followers View post →
Joel "Heart Prevention" Kahn MD, FACC
@drjkahn · X

Important and Hard to Achieve! Final Report of a Trial of Intensive versus Standard Blood-Pressure Control | NEJM https://t.co/BfuYuToIXD #kahnchronicle

May 25, 2021 · 1 like · 1 share · 32,274 followers View post →
Public Health Bulletin
@BulletinPublic · X

Final Report of a Trial of Intensive versus Standard Blood-Pressure Control. https://t.co/T3Cnck94Yi

May 25, 2021 · 19 followers View post →
Hospital Medicine Virtual Journal Club
@HMVJC · X

Final Report of a Trial of Intensive versus Standard Blood-Pressure Control: N Engl J Med. 2021 May 20;384(20):1921-1930. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1901281.ABSTRACTBACKGROUND: In a pre... https://t.co/u4LV6NDB6x

May 22, 2021 · 630 followers View post →
drjosflynn
@drjosflynn · X

RT @ASPNeph: Final Report of a Trial of Intensive versus Standard Blood-Pressure Control. The #SPRINT Research Group #HTN @NEJM https://t.…

May 22, 2021 · 2 shares · 8,061 followers View post →
Sandeep Sahay, MD, MSc
@SandeepSahayMD · X

Final Report of a Trial of Intensive versus Standard Blood-Pressure Control | NEJM https://t.co/uc0NDdn7Ob

May 22, 2021 · 6 likes · 1,387 followers View post →
Italo Kumamoto
@fikkumamoto · X

Final Report of a Trial of Intensive versus Standard Blood-Pressure Control | NEJM https://t.co/OFbJyrCrwL

May 22, 2021 · 1 like · 8,807 followers View post →
Dr Benil
@hafeeq_benil · X

RT @ASPNeph: Final Report of a Trial of Intensive versus Standard Blood-Pressure Control. The #SPRINT Research Group #HTN @NEJM https://t.…

May 22, 2021 · 2 shares · 393 followers View post →
American Society of Pediatric Nephrology
@ASPNeph · X

Final Report of a Trial of Intensive versus Standard Blood-Pressure Control. The #SPRINT Research Group #HTN @NEJM https://t.co/oK1Ej10mKp https://t.co/oTUmLfeqoG

May 22, 2021 · 4 likes · 2 shares · 10,139 followers View post →
questar1959replay
@questar1959rep1 · X

RT @DrTomFrieden: The SPRINT trial also showed that, despite more side effects, intensive blood pressure treatment to reach the lower blood…

May 21, 2021 · 31 shares · 10,907 followers View post →
Jerri Proctor
@jjp117 · X

RT @DrTomFrieden: The SPRINT trial also showed that, despite more side effects, intensive blood pressure treatment to reach the lower blood…

May 21, 2021 · 31 shares · 928 followers View post →
Who
@iWeltschmerz_ · X

RT @DrTomFrieden: The SPRINT trial also showed that, despite more side effects, intensive blood pressure treatment to reach the lower blood…

May 21, 2021 · 31 shares · 224 followers View post →
Dr. Tom Frieden
@DrTomFrieden · X

The SPRINT trial also showed that, despite more side effects, intensive blood pressure treatment to reach the lower blood pressure goal is safe – even in older people. Intensive treatment prevented more heart attacks, strokes and deaths. https://t.co/rNliSs9Pun 6/

May 21, 2021 · 89 likes · 31 shares · 237,451 followers View post →
Hot Science Balloon
@hotsciballoon · X

Nutshell #270: Systolic blood pressure below 120 mm Hg was associated with a 42% lower likelihood of cardiovascular mortality compared to between 120 and 140 mm Hg in patients with hypertension. @NEJM https://t.co/7MVJFkssoG

May 21, 2021 · 99 followers View post →
J. Moreno-Fernandez
@TechnoDiabetes · X

Articule of the week and it’s not about technology in #DM

May 21, 2021 · 1,495 followers View post →
Razmik Bebedjian
@razmik_dr · X

Trial of Intensive versus Standard Blood-Pressure Control. In non diabetic patients with vascular risk factors, intensive less than 120mmhg had lower adverse events than less than 140mmmhg. For primary prevention! https://t.co/DoADyuo0rS

May 20, 2021 · 1 like · 986 followers View post →
the paper link
@the_paper_link · X

Trend new: Sprint Research Group, ..., Ambrosius WT (N Engl J Med) __Final Report of a Trial of Intensive versus Standard Blood-Pressure Control__ https://t.co/VmLcEBnpX6

May 20, 2021 · 136 followers View post →
Dr. Luiz Silva
@DrLuizSilva1 · X

RT @gcfmd: ⬇️ HF risk with intensive SBP strategy Yet once trial ends, rapid rebound in HF risk in the post-intervention period when SBP c…

May 20, 2021 · 6 shares · 391 followers View post →
Suleman Aktaa
@SulemanAktaa · X

RT @gcfmd: ⬇️ HF risk with intensive SBP strategy Yet once trial ends, rapid rebound in HF risk in the post-intervention period when SBP c…

May 20, 2021 · 6 shares · 650 followers View post →
Adrian “WE NEED RCTS!” Hernandez
@texhern · X

RT @gcfmd: ⬇️ HF risk with intensive SBP strategy Yet once trial ends, rapid rebound in HF risk in the post-intervention period when SBP c…

May 20, 2021 · 6 shares · 3,798 followers View post →
Luis Arigita
@luis_arigita · X

RT @FernandoCiveir1: Final Report of a Trial of Intensive versus Standard Blood-Pressure Control | NEJM https://t.co/maPUU4Ra2z

May 20, 2021 · 1 share · 48 followers View post →
Dr. Euclides Cavalcanti
@Links_Medicus · X

SPRINT Trial final report: targeting a systolic BP < 120 mmHg in patients at increased CV risk is associated with improved CV and mortality outcomes but increases the risk of serious adverse events – via @NEJM https://t.co/PSLqGImIju Commentary: https://t.co/Aa1CUUasn5

May 20, 2021 · 1 like · 29,436 followers View post →
Ken Gusler
@kgusler · X

Final Report of a Trial of Intensive versus Standard Blood-Pressure Control - https://t.co/jpgRHLeF9v

May 20, 2021 · 20,030 followers View post →
Leonard Chiu, MD MS
@LeonardChiuMD · X

RT @gcfmd: ⬇️ HF risk with intensive SBP strategy Yet once trial ends, rapid rebound in HF risk in the post-intervention period when SBP c…

May 20, 2021 · 6 shares · 5,750 followers View post →
Muthu Vaduganathan
@mvaduganathan · X

RT @gcfmd: ⬇️ HF risk with intensive SBP strategy Yet once trial ends, rapid rebound in HF risk in the post-intervention period when SBP c…

May 20, 2021 · 6 shares · 9,208 followers View post →
Gregg Fonarow MD
@gcfmd · X

⬇️ HF risk with intensive SBP strategy Yet once trial ends, rapid rebound in HF risk in the post-intervention period when SBP control lessened HF HR 1.63, 95 CI 1.02-2.57 Final Report of a Trial of Intensive versus Standard Blood-Pressure Control | NEJM https://t.co/O0x5YqX4EI

May 20, 2021 · 30 likes · 6 shares · 11,835 followers View post →
Boback Ziaeian
@boback · X

Final Report of a Trial of Intensive versus Standard Blood-Pressure Control @nejm https://t.co/omGNTq6XXf

May 20, 2021 · 3,361 followers View post →
Pervaiz majeed MD
@Pervaizzunga · X

RT @hillz758: Final Report of a Trial of Intensive versus Standard Blood-Pressure Control | NEJM https://t.co/KEKiXl66xa

May 20, 2021 · 1 share · 393 followers View post →
hilal mohiuddin, MD, DM
@hilal_endo · X

Final Report of a Trial of Intensive versus Standard Blood-Pressure Control | NEJM https://t.co/KEKiXl66xa

May 20, 2021 · 4 likes · 1 share · 277 followers View post →
Dataemia
@Dataemia · X

(Final Report of a Trial of Intensive versus Standard Blood-Pressure Control) https://t.co/uHknYe2xNr

May 20, 2021 · 966 followers View post →
john morley
@drjohnmorley · X

Final Report of a Trial of Intensive versus Standard Blood-Pressure Control | NEJM https://t.co/QYCp1TS23Z

May 20, 2021 · 1 like · 8,320 followers View post →
HRT
@qryhrt · X

RT @RealTNagasawa: Final Report of a Trial of Intensive versus Standard Blood-Pressure Control | NEJM https://t.co/1a2QZPY6IE

May 20, 2021 · 1 share · 36 followers View post →
Viet Le DMSc PA-C FACC FAHA HF-Cert
@VietHeartPA · X

RT @ethanjweiss: You might think you had heard everything about SPRINT. You'd be wrong. Final Report of a Trial of Intensive versus Standa…

May 20, 2021 · 9 shares · 9,793 followers View post →
Guillermo Martin
@gmartinreyes · X

Final Report of a Trial of Intensive versus Standard Blood-Pressure Control | NEJM https://t.co/V7U8oOSbga

May 20, 2021 · 9 followers View post →
Şenol Apaydın, MD
@senol_apaydin_ · X

RT @AshuPJadhav: Final Report of a Trial of Intensive versus Standard Blood-Pressure Control | NEJM https://t.co/jM8bT3KBOM “Targeting an…

May 20, 2021 · 2 shares · 54 followers View post →
Alex Gutiérrez-Dalmau
@AlexGtrzD · X

Lower major CV events and lower all-cause mortality in the intensive group (SBP < 120), at expenses of more electrolyte abnormalities and AKI or failure in the total group. Final Report of a Trial of Intensive versus Standard Blood-Pressure Control | NEJM https://t.co/PCcxyqMh75

May 20, 2021 · 3 likes · 359 followers View post →
長澤 将(腎臓内科医)
@RealTNagasawa · X

Final Report of a Trial of Intensive versus Standard Blood-Pressure Control | NEJM https://t.co/1a2QZPY6IE

May 20, 2021 · 1 share · 5,209 followers View post →
Fernando Civeira
@FernandoCiveir1 · X

Final Report of a Trial of Intensive versus Standard Blood-Pressure Control | NEJM https://t.co/maPUU4Ra2z

May 20, 2021 · 1 like · 1 share · 343 followers View post →
renalRCTs
@renalRCTs · X

Final Report of a Trial of Intensive versus Standard Blood-Pressure Control https://t.co/zOCiyCefLp https://t.co/Rxyjifl9Rd

May 19, 2021 · 1 like · 39 followers View post →
Nicolas Renna, MD PhD ISHF FESC
@nicolasrennamd · X

Entre los pacientes que tenían un mayor riesgo cardiovascular, apuntar a una presión arterial sistólica de menos de 120 mm Hg resultó en tasas más bajas de eventos CV. Final Report of a Trial of Intensive versus Standard Blood-Pressure Control | NEJM https://t.co/TY16ykuzke

May 19, 2021 · 934 followers View post →
Nicolas Renna, MD PhD ISHF FESC
@nicolasrennamd · X

RT @ethanjweiss: You might think you had heard everything about SPRINT. You'd be wrong. Final Report of a Trial of Intensive versus Standa…

May 19, 2021 · 9 shares · 934 followers View post →
Rakesh Malhotra, MD
@iRakeshMalhotra · X

RT @ethanjweiss: You might think you had heard everything about SPRINT. You'd be wrong. Final Report of a Trial of Intensive versus Standa…

May 19, 2021 · 9 shares · 963 followers View post →
Nathan Lo
@NathanLo3579 · X

RT @ethanjweiss: You might think you had heard everything about SPRINT. You'd be wrong. Final Report of a Trial of Intensive versus Standa…

May 19, 2021 · 9 shares · 2,398 followers View post →
Kirsten Bibbins-Domingo
@KBibbinsDomingo · X

RT @ethanjweiss: You might think you had heard everything about SPRINT. You'd be wrong. Final Report of a Trial of Intensive versus Standa…

May 19, 2021 · 9 shares · 13,402 followers View post →
AshuJadhav
@AshuPJadhav · X

Final Report of a Trial of Intensive versus Standard Blood-Pressure Control | NEJM https://t.co/jM8bT3KBOM “Targeting an SBP of <120 mm Hg resulted in lower rates of major adverse cardiovascular events and lower all-cause mortality than targeting an SBP <140 mm Hg,”

May 19, 2021 · 7 likes · 2 shares · 17,501 followers View post →
priya joseph
@ayirpelle · X

RT @ethanjweiss: You might think you had heard everything about SPRINT. You'd be wrong. Final Report of a Trial of Intensive versus Standa…

May 19, 2021 · 9 shares · 4,924 followers View post →
Paperbirds_Neurology
@PaperbirdsN · X

New article: Final Report of a Trial of Intensive versus Standard Blood-Pressure Control https://t.co/uZ9UQW92w8 #alzheimers #neurology https://t.co/UG8SxsdWTP

May 19, 2021 · 457 followers View post →
Jeremy S. Pollock
@bmorecardiology · X

RT @ethanjweiss: You might think you had heard everything about SPRINT. You'd be wrong. Final Report of a Trial of Intensive versus Standa…

May 19, 2021 · 9 shares · 1,622 followers View post →
Cardio-Targets
@CardioTargets · X

Final Report of a Trial of Intensive versus Standard Blood-Pressure Control https://t.co/4V2tQDIh2C

May 19, 2021 · 153 followers View post →
DrJMLuther
@DrJMLuther · X

RT @ethanjweiss: You might think you had heard everything about SPRINT. You'd be wrong. Final Report of a Trial of Intensive versus Standa…

May 19, 2021 · 9 shares · 2,626 followers View post →
江花有亮 Yusuke Ebana MD PhD CReP
@ebnysk1 · X

降圧療法のランダム試験。厳格に下げれば心血管イベントが減るが、低血圧などの副作用も多いことがわかった!(そりゃそうだ…) Final Report of a Trial of Intensive versus Standard Blood-Pressure Control | NEJM https://t.co/rftZr0F3bA

May 19, 2021 · 141 followers View post →
Raj Mehta
@raj_mehta · X

RT @ethanjweiss: You might think you had heard everything about SPRINT. You'd be wrong. Final Report of a Trial of Intensive versus Standa…

May 19, 2021 · 9 shares · 2,136 followers View post →
Ethan J. Weiss
@ethanjweiss · X

You might think you had heard everything about SPRINT. You'd be wrong. Final Report of a Trial of Intensive versus Standard Blood-Pressure Control | NEJM https://t.co/667yqxFEMb

May 19, 2021 · 29 likes · 9 shares · 30,107 followers View post →