Continuous monitoring of colonoscopy performance in the Netherlands: first results of a nationwide registry.

Karlijn J Nass, Peter J van der Schaar, Manon van der Vlugt, Michiel Ledeboer, Aura A J van Esch, Sander van der Beek, Miangela M Lacle, Monique E van Leerdam, Rob J T Ouwendijk, Manon C W Spaander, Michel W J M Wouters, Paul Fockens, Evelien Dekker

May 2022 Endoscopy

Synopsis of Social media discussions

The discussions reflect a keen interest in the implications of the nationwide registry, with examples like the encouragement to access the article through libraries and the emphasis on setting performance benchmarks. The tone combines appreciation for the study’s methodology with practical suggestions, showing thoughtful engagement and recognition of its relevance for future clinical practice.

A
Agreement
 Moderate agreement

Most discussions acknowledge the value of the study and agree on its importance for quality improvement in colonoscopy procedures.

I
Interest
 High level of interest

The provided comments show strong curiosity, especially with references to additional resources like podcasts and graphical abstracts that deepen understanding.

E
Engagement
 Moderate level of engagement

The mentions of specific elements such as benchmarking, adverse event rates, and practical tools (like adding DOIs for sharing) indicate active involvement with the content.

I
Impact
 Moderate level of impact

While primarily supportive and engaged, the discussion hints at potential influence on practice standards and awareness, though not explicitly claiming immediate change.

Social Mentions

YouTube

1 Videos

Facebook

2 Posts

Twitter

3 Posts

Metrics

Video Views

41

Total Likes

1

Extended Reach

23,721

Social Features

6

Timeline: Posts about article

Top Social Media Posts

Posts referencing the article

Nationwide Study of Colonoscopy Performance and Safety in the Netherlands

Nationwide Study of Colonoscopy Performance and Safety in the Netherlands

This study reports on the initial results of a Dutch national registry tracking colonoscopy performance and adverse events, analyzing data from over 266,000 procedures to evaluate success rates and safety across various indications.

endoscopythieme

April 21, 2022

41 views

  • Endoscopy Journal
    @endoscopyjrnl (Twitter)

    #Podcast Continuous monitoring of colonoscopy performance in the Netherlands: first results of a nationwide registry by Karlijn J. Nass, Peter J. van der Schaar, Manon van der Vlugt et al. Listen to the Podcast on YouTube: https://t.co/y5Pjjhdfi6
    view full post

    May 10, 2022

  • LibKey
    @libkey_io (Twitter)

    @endoscopyjrnl Help your colleagues avoid a paywall by accessing the article from their libraries: https://t.co/DubdQLcKo0 Simply add https://t.co/SXSePSX5De to the DOI URL when sharing articles on Twitter and everywhere else!
    view full post

    May 6, 2022

  • Endoscopy Journal
    @endoscopyjrnl (Twitter)

    Continuous monitoring of colonoscopy performance in the Netherlands: first results of a nationwide registry by Karlijn J. Nass, Peter J. van der Schaar, Manon van der Vlugt et al. #GraphicalAbstract Find out more here: https://t.co/vgN701axAP https://t.co/QDx3mzqapZ
    view full post

    May 6, 2022

    1

Abstract Synopsis

  • This study examined the initial results of a comprehensive national registry in the Netherlands that tracks colonoscopy performance and adverse events, analyzing data from over 266,000 procedures to identify differences based on the reason for the procedure.
  • The findings showed that success rates like cecal intubation and bowel preparation quality were highest in screening colonoscopies following positive FIT tests, with adverse events such as bleeding and perforation occurring more frequently during therapeutic procedures.
  • The study highlights the importance of setting specific performance benchmarks for different indications of colonoscopy to improve quality and safety, as the results revealed variability in performance across various types of procedures.]