Synopsis of Social media discussions
The overall discourse highlights concerns about variability and researcher flexibility in N400 research, with posts pointing out the publication’s emphasis on standardization and transparency. Words like 'reproducibility,' 'standards,' and 'research practices' reflect a tone of constructive critique aimed at advancing scientific rigor and consistency in ERP studies.
Agreement
Moderate agreementMost discussions acknowledge the importance of the article, especially its focus on standardizing methods and improving reproducibility in N400 studies.
Interest
High level of interestParticipants show high interest, actively discussing methodological issues such as researcher degrees of freedom and the need for better standards.
Engagement
Moderate level of engagementThe posts reference specific aspects of the publication, like systematic review findings and suggestions for research practices, indicating a moderate level of engagement.
Impact
Moderate level of impactUsers recognize the article’s potential to influence research practices, emphasizing its relevance to improving the reliability of neurophysiological studies.
Social Mentions
YouTube
2 Videos
13 Posts
Metrics
Video Views
320
Total Likes
24
Extended Reach
36,295
Social Features
15
Timeline: Posts about article
Top Social Media Posts
Anđela Šoškić
Our systematic review of the ERP (more specifically N400) methodology and methods reporting just came out in the Neuropsychology Review!
https://t.co/jx3CyPyhry @VanjaKovic @suzyjstyles @EmilyKappenman
view full post
PsyArXiv-bot
How to do better N400 studies: reproducibility, consistency and adherence to research standards in the existing literature https://t.co/yhTPmFrnvV
view full post
YF Yang- @ufangyang.bsky.social
Reading List
Towards ARTEM-IS (2021) https://t.co/hVAPvjjRjq
Garden of Forking paths in EEG (2022) https://t.co/3T8EfgHI6f
How to do better N400 studies (2021) https://t.co/5W1oE8unLw
Good Scientific Practices in MEEG (2021) https://t.co/2a28w9mJXE
view full post
SystematicReviewBot
RT @angelasoskic: Our systematic review of the ERP (more specifically N400) methodology and methods reporting just came out in the Neuropsy…
view full post
Gilad Feldman
RT @PsyArXivBot: How to do better N400 studies: reproducibility, consistency and adherence to research standards in the existing literature…
view full post
Posts referencing the article
Automating Binaural Audio Calibration for Neuroscience Research
This talk by Suzy J Styles, 2022 NTU Open Research Award recipient, presents a new automated calibration procedure for headphone audio using an artificial head and torso simulator. Implemented with LabVIEW, this method enhances accuracy and efficiency in neuroscience audio stimuli.
March 18, 2024
173 views
-
@timmytimmytim Šoškić et al.'s systematic review on image-elicited N400 studies might be relevant here: It concluded that "each study had a unique approach to ERP data recording, processing and analysis," suggesting high researcher degrees of freedom as a major issue. https://t.co/Hd4bVJPRqe
view full postAugust 23, 2024
-
Akira Miyake
@AMiyakeCU (Twitter)Our results raise an important Q: How best to analyze ERP data without engaging in QRPs like p-hacking? Researcher degrees of freedom are high, and, in reality, different studies use different parameters (see Šoškić’s review). (9/10) https://t.co/Hd4bVJPRqe
view full postAugust 22, 2024
-
YF Yang- @ufangyang.bsky.social
@ufangyang (Twitter)Reading List Towards ARTEM-IS (2021) https://t.co/hVAPvjjRjq Garden of Forking paths in EEG (2022) https://t.co/3T8EfgHI6f How to do better N400 studies (2021) https://t.co/5W1oE8unLw Good Scientific Practices in MEEG (2021) https://t.co/2a28w9mJXE
view full postJanuary 6, 2023
3
-
Prof Neil Martin
@ThatNeilMartin (Twitter)How to do better N400 studies- tips on reproducibility, consistency and standards. https://t.co/ffJMv3G6re
view full postAugust 20, 2021
-
Paul McCullough
@ThePostsynaptic (Twitter)RT @ThePostsynaptic: How to do Better N400 Studies: Reproducibility, Consistency and Adherence to Research Standards in the Existing Litera…
view full postAugust 15, 2021
1
-
Paul McCullough
@ThePostsynaptic (Twitter)How to do Better N400 Studies: Reproducibility, Consistency and Adherence to Research Standards in the Existing Literature https://t.co/gNTENBXSGh
view full postAugust 14, 2021
1
-
Vanja Kovic
@VanjaKovic (Twitter)RT @angelasoskic: Our systematic review of the ERP (more specifically N400) methodology and methods reporting just came out in the Neuropsy…
view full postAugust 12, 2021
5
-
Dr. Krista Byers-Heinlein
@Krista_BH (Twitter)RT @angelasoskic: Our systematic review of the ERP (more specifically N400) methodology and methods reporting just came out in the Neuropsy…
view full postAugust 11, 2021
5
-
Dr. Mariella Paul
@mariella_n_paul (Twitter)RT @angelasoskic: Our systematic review of the ERP (more specifically N400) methodology and methods reporting just came out in the Neuropsy…
view full postAugust 10, 2021
5
-
SystematicReviewBot
@EvidenceRobot (Twitter)RT @angelasoskic: Our systematic review of the ERP (more specifically N400) methodology and methods reporting just came out in the Neuropsy…
view full postAugust 10, 2021
5
-
Anđela Šoškić
@angelasoskic (Twitter)Our systematic review of the ERP (more specifically N400) methodology and methods reporting just came out in the Neuropsychology Review! https://t.co/jx3CyPyhry @VanjaKovic @suzyjstyles @EmilyKappenman
view full postAugust 10, 2021
13
5
-
Gilad Feldman
@giladfeldman (Twitter)RT @PsyArXivBot: How to do better N400 studies: reproducibility, consistency and adherence to research standards in the existing literature…
view full postJanuary 18, 2020
2
-
PsyArXiv-bot
@PsyArXivBot (Twitter)How to do better N400 studies: reproducibility, consistency and adherence to research standards in the existing literature https://t.co/yhTPmFrnvV
view full postJanuary 17, 2020
6
2
Abstract Synopsis
- The review examines how well ERP (Event-Related Potential) studies, specifically focusing on the N400 component in healthy adults, report their methodologies, highlighting variability and common omissions across 132 papers published between 1980 and 2018.
- The findings reveal that each study tends to have a unique approach to data collection and analysis, with consistent gaps in transparency and adherence to best practice guidelines, making reproducibility challenging.
- To improve future research, the authors suggest establishing standardized decision points—like selecting measurement windows and electrode sites—based on existing literature to enhance consistency and reliability in N400 studies.]
Akira Miyake
@AMiyakeCU (Twitter)