Mentions
Extended reach
Total likes
Video views
AI synopsis
The overall discourse highlights concerns about variability and researcher flexibility in N400 research, with posts pointing out the publication’s emphasis on standardization and transparency. Words like 'reproducibility,' 'standards,' and 'research practices' reflect a tone of constructive critique aimed at advancing scientific rigor and consistency in ERP studies.
Most discussions acknowledge the importance of the article, especially its focus on standardizing methods and improving reproducibility in N400 studies.
Participants show high interest, actively discussing methodological issues such as researcher degrees of freedom and the need for better standards.
The posts reference specific aspects of the publication, like systematic review findings and suggestions for research practices, indicating a moderate level of engagement.
Users recognize the article’s potential to influence research practices, emphasizing its relevance to improving the reliability of neurophysiological studies.
Our systematic review of the ERP (more specifically N400) methodology and methods reporting just came out in the Neuropsychology Review! https://t.co/jx3CyPyhry @VanjaKovic @suzyjstyles @EmilyKappenman
How to do better N400 studies: reproducibility, consistency and adherence to research standards in the existing literature https://t.co/yhTPmFrnvV
Reading List Towards ARTEM-IS (2021) https://t.co/hVAPvjjRjq Garden of Forking paths in EEG (2022) https://t.co/3T8EfgHI6f How to do better N400 studies (2021) https://t.co/5W1oE8unLw Good Scientific Practices in MEEG (2021) https://t.co/2a28w9mJXE
RT @angelasoskic: Our systematic review of the ERP (more specifically N400) methodology and methods reporting just came out in the Neuropsy…
RT @PsyArXivBot: How to do better N400 studies: reproducibility, consistency and adherence to research standards in the existing literature…
RT @angelasoskic: Our systematic review of the ERP (more specifically N400) methodology and methods reporting just came out in the Neuropsy…
This talk by Suzy J Styles, 2022 NTU Open Research Award recipient, presents a new automated calibration procedure for headphone audio using an artificial head and torso simulator. Implemented with LabVIEW, this method…
@timmytimmytim Šoškić et al.'s systematic review on image-elicited N400 studies might be relevant here: It concluded that "each study had a unique approach to ERP data recording, processing and analysis," suggesting high researcher degrees of freedom as a major issue. https://t.co/Hd4bVJPRqe
Our results raise an important Q: How best to analyze ERP data without engaging in QRPs like p-hacking? Researcher degrees of freedom are high, and, in reality, different studies use different parameters (see Šoškić’s review). (9/10) https://t.co/Hd4bVJPRqe
Reading List Towards ARTEM-IS (2021) https://t.co/hVAPvjjRjq Garden of Forking paths in EEG (2022) https://t.co/3T8EfgHI6f How to do better N400 studies (2021) https://t.co/5W1oE8unLw Good Scientific Practices in MEEG (2021) https://t.co/2a28w9mJXE
How to do better N400 studies- tips on reproducibility, consistency and standards. https://t.co/ffJMv3G6re
RT @ThePostsynaptic: How to do Better N400 Studies: Reproducibility, Consistency and Adherence to Research Standards in the Existing Litera…
How to do Better N400 Studies: Reproducibility, Consistency and Adherence to Research Standards in the Existing Literature https://t.co/gNTENBXSGh
RT @angelasoskic: Our systematic review of the ERP (more specifically N400) methodology and methods reporting just came out in the Neuropsy…
RT @angelasoskic: Our systematic review of the ERP (more specifically N400) methodology and methods reporting just came out in the Neuropsy…
RT @angelasoskic: Our systematic review of the ERP (more specifically N400) methodology and methods reporting just came out in the Neuropsy…
RT @angelasoskic: Our systematic review of the ERP (more specifically N400) methodology and methods reporting just came out in the Neuropsy…
Our systematic review of the ERP (more specifically N400) methodology and methods reporting just came out in the Neuropsychology Review! https://t.co/jx3CyPyhry @VanjaKovic @suzyjstyles @EmilyKappenman
RT @PsyArXivBot: How to do better N400 studies: reproducibility, consistency and adherence to research standards in the existing literature…
How to do better N400 studies: reproducibility, consistency and adherence to research standards in the existing literature https://t.co/yhTPmFrnvV
AŠ
PB
YS
S
GF
DH
AM
PM
PM
VK
DP