@Idaneretz אתה עונה? רוצה את הfollow up של עד חצי שנה? מה שקראת לו "הפיתוח המקורי"? הנהhttps://t.co/w1qhW31GVy רק תראה לי שם איפה הוכחה הפחתת הדבקה שהצדיקה מבחינתך לצאת להגנת התו הירוק,כדי שנדע באיזו רצינות להתייחס לתחקירי הבריאות הבאים שלך על החרדים המלוכלכים שחיים בצפיפות ומפיצים חצבת
Safety and Efficacy of the BNT162b2 mRNA Covid-19 Vaccine through 6 Months.
Mentions
Extended reach
Total likes
Video views
Mentions per month
Mar 2021 – Nov 2025Where it's discussed
-
X / Twitter450 posts
-
News154 articles
-
Blogs15 articles
-
Bluesky12 posts
-
Facebook9 posts
-
YouTube5 videos
-
Reddit5 posts
AI synopsis
What people are saying
The group demonstrates strong support for the vaccine's safety and efficacy, citing detailed clinical trial results from reputable studies like NEJM. Their tone varies from neutral to slightly assertive, with some posts highlighting the extensive research and rigorous study designs, indicating a well-informed discussion with high relevance for public health debates.
Most discussions support the study’s findings, citing the large sample size and scientific rigor as confirmation of safety and efficacy.
Discussions show high interest, often referencing specific data points, trial phases, and scientific publications.
Several posts refer to detailed trial data, pointing out study design and results, indicating deep engagement.
While authoritative sources are cited, the overall tone tends to reinforce existing consensus, so the influence on broader public opinion appears moderate.
Abstract in brief
- BNT162b2 is an mRNA vaccine for Covid-19 that shows high efficacy (91.3%) and a good safety profile over 6 months, with very few participants experiencing severe adverse events.
- The vaccine was tested on over 44,000 participants aged 12 and older, demonstrating consistent efficacy across various demographics and risk factors.
- While there was a gradual decline in vaccine efficacy over time, it remained effective against severe disease (96.7%) and showed remarkable results (100% efficacy) in areas with specific variants like B.1.351 in South Africa.
Top posts
Most liked on X and Bluesky@DocAmine_ je comprends que les études scientifiques ce n'est pas pour toi. tu viens a peine de rentrer dans le marché du travail
Mr Cartland! Top tip, read the full research highlighted in the medRxiv that you shared, that you didnt read.! This research supports the safety and efficacy of covid vax. Research and Nct below. Cheers @CartlandDavid
@MartMichaelis Das steht weder in Ihrer Quelle, noch in Pfizers Zulassungsstudie. Es ist schlicht eine Lüge, die so lange wiederholt wird, bis jeder es glaubt. https://t.co/67y8ZysoVR
10/ References Ages 16–17 (Pfizer Phase 3 Trial)
@DrJKunadhasan Do you mean that the number of deaths is wrong in the september 2021 publication ? That 30 deaths were hidden ?? https://t.co/kcMdTizQOS https://t.co/J9n0j7mY2P
All mentions
Assessing Pfizer COVID-19 Vaccine Effectiveness in Real-World Setting
This video reviews a large-scale study evaluating the Pfizer BNT162b2 mRNA COVID-19 vaccine's effectiveness in Israel, showing high effectiveness in preventing infection, symptomatic disease, severe illness, and death…
Understanding SARS-CoV-2 Immunity from Infection and Vaccination Efforts
This video explores how multiple exposures to SARS-CoV-2, through infection and vaccination, shape immune responses, including antibody memory and T cell activity. It highlights the need for vaccine updates to protect…
Analyzing Claims of Risk in Vaccine Safety Studies
Dr Aseem Malhotra promotes a questionable paper linked to vaccine safety. This video reviews the study's validity, highlighting discrepancies and the importance of understanding vaccine-related risks versus COVID-19…
Evaluating the Effectiveness of Covid Vaccines in Reducing Hospitalizations
This video investigates the claim that Covid vaccines reduce hospitalizations by over 90% and examines the literature and methodology behind this figure. We analyze vaccine efficacy and safety over 6 months based on…
Understanding Medical Exemptions and COVID-19 Vaccine Safety
Join us for an in-depth discussion on medical exemptions, vaccine safety, and how to apply correctly. Topics include HIPAA rights, VAERS data, Pfizer trial insights, pathogen priming risks, vaccine reactions, and…
Assessing the True Impact of COVID-19 Vaccines on Mortality
Current trials for COVID-19 vaccines do not conclusively determine their impact on saving lives. This video delves into the nuances of vaccine efficacy, emphasizing the importance of measuring long-term effectiveness…
@f_zimmerly @RWMaloneMD Here's one. Have a look and you will find many more. https://t.co/ofmapTrwnU
@Kosch3076 @HugoHebR Ce n'est pas une "équipe", c'est un fait Sérieusement ? Dans quel monde tu vis ? https://t.co/MlYjKuEODK https://t.co/ZXEc1diYpc https://t.co/2krJioCN54 https://t.co/LVnvpPdxo1 https://t.co/39YkMuUjno https://t.co/n05JgxdngG https://t.co/z7g8Pl7EjD
@BobMurphyEcon https://t.co/bdPd0jQIRj
@BobMurphyEcon https://t.co/T64JaRU6Tl
@VinnMango @MScottCooperCS @K_Bishof @joeroganhq I looked it up, and the majority of the deaths where very very old people (over 75), in both groups. Exactly what I suspected. So that really doesn’t mean anything in terms of the vaccine being safe one way or another to me: https://t.co/q1SjGImv7A.)
@gustavostu @glauber_doc Safety and Efficacy of the BNT162b2 mRNA Covid-19 Vaccine | New England Journal of Medicine https://t.co/uvmPOwKcqS
RT @michaelryan756: @Elkstone14879 @RogerGustafsso2 @wexlerwriting You asked for one double-blind placebo-controlled trial. Here are four —…
@Ponyfinder @BudvarCat @MdBreathe Maybe he‘s referring to this: https://t.co/uNOpOxEtuV
@Elkstone14879 @RogerGustafsso2 @wexlerwriting You asked for one double-blind placebo-controlled trial. Here are four — all peer-reviewed, all used for regulatory approval. ⸻ 1️⃣ Polack et al., NEJM 2020 – Pfizer (BNT162b2) “Safety and Efficacy of the BNT162b2 mRNA Covid-19 Vaccine.” •43,548 participants •Randomised,
@grok @DocMuc65 @wildfridolin @janinisabel Die Zahlen der Todesfälle stimmen nicht. Es müssten 20 bei den Geimpften sein und 14 bei Placebo. https://t.co/cAASWdpn7n
@grok Dr. Dormitzer, author of this NEJM article on Pfizer vaccine is paid by Pfizer . That really helps my confidence in their honesty https://t.co/wwY7zumjYQ Dr. Dormitzer can be contacted at philip.dormitzer@pfizer.com or at Pfizer, 401 N. Middletown Rd., Pearl River, NY 10965.
@grok @MT_urawatomiki @windmage2487498 さらにその試験は後の6ヶ月間の追跡調査ではプラセボ群より接種群の方が死亡者が多かったらしいね。感染予防効果も小島教授の指摘により三回接種した人のほうが感染した事が分かっているね。 私は断言していない。ただ危険かもしれないから調べようと言っているのだhttps://t.co/QHQVxqpW5A
@MrWorried476841 @__luzid__ Yes, it was saline. The screen dump is from this paper: https://t.co/D6v1IZTtoL
@RikeWaldfee Danke. Denn laut Zulassungsstudie sind in der Impfgruppe mehr Menschen gestorben als in der Placebogruppe. https://t.co/kBDC1z0Cor
@dregenus Wir gehen doch davon aus, dass in der Impfgruppe mehr Menschen sterben sollten als in der Placebogruppe. Sonst wäre es ja …. (Siehe supp.appendix S. 11) https://t.co/1tU1OuLNox (Menschen im Mittelalter hätten gewusst, das 14 Tote schlechter als 15 Tote sind)
@2nann @Humanspective Pfizer. He fudged a lot of those numbers though. https://t.co/Yd8XDDVm0D
@baineskaren55 @manoflamatzah @Humanspective No he is pulling so much shit out of his ass and you blindly eat it. If you look at the actual trial data, 2 people died of heart attack in the placebo group and 0 died in the vaccine group. He made up those heart attack numbers in the video. https://t.co/Yd8XDDVm0D
@ZuckerZucker3 @commonsense312 @NurLesendHier @PDebionne77 Pfizer's official data, published in September 2021, revealed a higher risk of all-cause and cardiac-related mortality among the vaccinated group than among the unvaccinated. Analysis: https://t.co/KhSWBxxUsZ PPT: https://t.co/fRoygkx7jw Paper: https://t.co/UWLdexofj7
@ypeskin @stkirsch @grok https://t.co/Da8010a7FM That graph is in the supplemental appendix at the bottom, Yury.
@gonzomech @DrNeilStone The COVID vaccine trials were randomized, double blind, and placebo controlled. https://t.co/Yd8XDDVTQb
@VMullemY @DrNeilStone The phase 3 randomized, double-blind, and placebo-controlled trial for the pfizer vax: https://t.co/Yd8XDDVTQb
@astynis @ShmilStam @wargonm https://t.co/zBvy6D3fHW
@Jeff_mc2 @IwasNov012022 @ChuckSteak16187 @jsm2334 @stkirsch Link to the supplementary appendix: https://t.co/Zxj1K44WXw
@Jeff_mc2 @IwasNov012022 @ChuckSteak16187 @jsm2334 @stkirsch It’s from the trial! https://t.co/YQMjwfomfn
@ettourneur Il est dans celle-ci: https://t.co/64n9v35V7R
@grok @stkirsch @DrNeilStone The 6 month followup of the RCTs confirm safety. https://t.co/OzsPoqu1R0 Steve’s claims that patient level data is infallible reflects his lack of qualifications in epidemiology. He hasn’t controlled adequately for bias. Old sick people get more vaccines. It’s not randomised
@SoundsHarsh @diegocaleiro @avidseries It’s literally in the quote tweet. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa2110345 Also, you don’t need a “paper” to understand what a 150% vaccination rate means for post market data everywhere. https://t.co/n4uDcVoHnY https://t.co/jQApa5D0GD
@dondank69 @ML6143840275640 @NicHulscher Apologies that was both supplemental appendix. Here is the study. https://t.co/E3RzRDDpW7
@dondank69 @ML6143840275640 @NicHulscher I will give you the data again https://t.co/9B0jtjCy8M that is the study. https://t.co/9B0jtjCy8M that is the supplemental appendix go to page 11. You can see the total deaths in both groups. Did you actually go look you’ll see I am correct.
@dondank69 @ML6143840275640 @NicHulscher https://t.co/9B0jtjC0je there is the link it’s on page 11. The vaccinated group had significantly more deaths from cardiac arrest.
@Jeff_mc2 @Facts_R_Good @jonathanstea published in Sept. ‘21 & formed the basis of the full BLA application (which was granted in Aug. ‘21) https://t.co/FN8UanJ5ke
@grok @MarsNAO @BGatesIsaPyscho A. There were more deaths in the vaccinated group in the Pfizer study https://t.co/fpMJxGUYtj B. I thought you said that correlation didn’t equal causation so you cant use meta-analyses of observational studies to support the assertion that covid vaccines prevented covid deaths
RT @Funeral_Bags: @n_e_rd @LepikInfo @unusual_whales https://t.co/J4vvJfKJQ6 20 people died who had vaccines; 14 people died on placebo.…
@DarkByDesign18 @ChildrensHD From 7 days after the second dose, 86 to 100% efficacy was observed across diverse demographic profiles, including age, sex, race or ethnic group, and factors that increase the risk of Covid-19 https://t.co/vQUwFgQUnz
@Charlie40074981 @Humanspective From 7 days after the second dose, 86 to 100% efficacy was observed across diverse demographic profiles, including age, sex, race or ethnic group, and factors that increase the risk of Covid-19 https://t.co/vQUwFgQUnz
RT @5rHxIhQGQnnRSOe: ファイザー治験プロトコルより。 https://t.co/CP5nuujo6f 製薬も最初から暴露と言う表現で、シェディングを想定済み。ファイザーの文書を示しても、当時は信用されず
RT @5rHxIhQGQnnRSOe: ファイザー治験プロトコルより。 https://t.co/CP5nuujo6f 製薬も最初から暴露と言う表現で、シェディングを想定済み。ファイザーの文書を示しても、当時は信用されず
@Mario55518 @simonmaechling https://t.co/uLL7l4LNYN
@Idaneretz אתה עונה? רוצה את הfollow up של עד חצי שנה? מה שקראת לו "הפיתוח המקורי"? הנהhttps://t.co/w1qhW31GVy רק תראה לי שם איפה הוכחה הפחתת הדבקה שהצדיקה מבחינתך לצאת להגנת התו הירוק,כדי שנדע באיזו רצינות להתייחס לתחקירי הבריאות הבאים שלך על החרדים המלוכלכים שחיים בצפיפות ומפיצים חצבת
@Beau_Dozer @truthforce_ @amattattacks @LeadingReport Efficacy data right here: https://t.co/VRkGQwXj89
@returns8143 @shinko_hadoken @WestsydeServer @ShaneAKAProp @TekTonic4 @sduncanhealth @jilel76 @crabb_vicki @JKelleyK @Questio31810600 @CaryDavid722 @Lorenzo7127 @1_TMF_ @Similar89 @Pouldeau61 @heptaglemious @ASchifty @trillionofcells @Arkout3 @raoulduke49 @TheFrankmanMN @Kathmarval @AnnLove4All @VickiCoyle10019 @BB0941167867205 @dann58638436 @MissAMD1962 @TakethatCt @Veeteejay1 @Scary7Dr @runhack @KDSKidDoc @mollymaynne @mcfunny @krebiozen @doritmi @FUDyou2 @ProfDuckDuckGo @whodisdontcare @LordButters22 @AphasiaAnomic @taurusg333 @MsTrixter @MONTMAN9500 @CDCgov @HHSGov Randomised trials & large studies show mRNA vaccines substantially reduced COVID hospitalisations & deaths post rollout. NEJM reports showed strong vaccine efficacy & a booster study reported large reductions in COVID mortality among boosted participants. https://t.co/h8ufep6rOe
@RikLesel @sayerjigmi 1. Thomas SJ, Moreira ED Jr, Kitchin N, et al. Safety and Efficacy of the BNT162b2 mRNA Covid-19 Vaccine through 6 Months. N Engl J Med 2021; 385:1761.
@RikLesel @sayerjigmi 1. Polack FP, Thomas SJ, Kitchin N, et al. Safety and Efficacy of the BNT162b2 mRNA Covid-19 Vaccine. N Engl J Med 2020; 383:2603.
- **データの一貫性**: PfizerとBioNTechの報告書([Safety and Efficacy of the BNT162b2 mRNA Covid-19 Vaccine](https://t.co/HZs5ZpxFSl))には、2021年までのワクチン接種データが記載されていますが、Fosunからの具体的な10億回分の配布に関する言及はありません。
Pfizerの文書([Safety and Efficacy of the BNT162b2 mRNA Covid-19 Vaccine](https://t.co/HZs5ZpxFSl))には、深刻な副作用のデータが詳細に記載されており、Wolfの主張を裏付ける根拠となっています。
@gdisacco1 @DanieleScalea @acnewsitics https://t.co/HVCuhkS1XN https://t.co/pauTjsCKom https://t.co/FzHcHFKT70 https://t.co/NRf1cOkLoF
@Charlie40074981 @VUsuxballs @harryfisherEMTP @PierreKory @stkirsch 11/ References 1.Polack FP, et al. Safety and Efficacy of the BNT162b2 mRNA Covid-19 Vaccine. NEJM. 2020;383:2603-2615. [PMID: 33301246] 2.Thomas SJ, et al. Safety and Efficacy of the BNT162b2 Vaccine through 6 Months. NEJM. 2021;385:1761-1773. [PMID: 34525277]
RT @IntegralAnswers: 11/ Vaccine outcomes: • Polack FP et al. “Safety and Efficacy of the BNT162b2 mRNA Covid-19 Vaccine.” NEJM. 2020. [PMI…
On this day in COVID history, September 15, 2021: Safety and Efficacy of the BNT162b2 mRNA Covid-19 Vaccine through 6 Months Source: The New England Journal of Medicine https://t.co/o4vEejMSGX
On this day in COVID history, September 15, 2021: Safety and Efficacy of the BNT162b2 mRNA Covid-19 Vaccine through 6 Months Source: The New England Journal of Medicine https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMoa2110345
11/ Vaccine outcomes: • Polack FP et al. “Safety and Efficacy of the BNT162b2 mRNA Covid-19 Vaccine.” NEJM. 2020. [PMID: 33301246] • Baden LR et al. “Efficacy and Safety of the mRNA-1273 Vaccine.” NEJM. 2021. [PMID: 33378609]
@zbingeldac @newstart_2024 Safety and Efficacy of the BNT162b2 mRNA Covid-19 Vaccine ◦DOI: https://t.co/vfTBa0oZ9T Safety and Immunogenicity of Two RNA-Based Covid-19 Vaccine Candidates DOI: https://t.co/3qm1xnC0xR Efficacy and Safety of the mRNA-1273 SARS-CoV-2 Vaccine ◦DOI: https://t.co/3AhQgEaXgU
@JMaaan8989 @AnActualWizard @simonmaechling DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa2110345 DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa2034577 doi: 10.1038/s41467-024-50376-z. doi: 10.1186/s40249-021-00878-5. doi: 10.3390/vaccines11061118. There are plenty of studies available. Here’s the first five results I found!
@rrkinter @JasonClark829 @BillBramhall Lol@ a pdf of "concerns" Whats the actual peer reviewed study you posted say? https://t.co/fDJ9Eyix7a
@rrkinter @JasonClark829 @BillBramhall Lol... Where does your study say the vaccine has no efficacy? https://t.co/fDJ9Eyix7a
@rrkinter @JasonClark829 @BillBramhall Lol... Anything yet on where your study says vaccines have no efficacy? https://t.co/fDJ9Eyix7a
@rrkinter @JasonClark829 @BillBramhall Here's the peer reviewed published version. Can you show me where it says the vaccines had no efficacy? https://t.co/fDJ9Eyix7a
@kinlochleven7 @WasFound05 @DrAseemMalhotra You obviously didn't read the peer reviewed paper about the safety and efficacy of the BNT162b2 vaccine. If you had you may not be attempting to make abusive comments. https://t.co/ofmapTrwnU https://t.co/hloONpDfdD
@CovfefeDnUnder @CaseyDeSantis Safety and Efficacy of the BNT162b2 mRNA Covid-19 Vaccine Authors: Fernando P. Polack, M.D., Stephen J. Thomas, M.D., Nicholas Kitchin, M.D., Judith Absalon, M.D., Alejandra Gurtman, M.D., Stephen Lockhart, D.M., John L. Perez, M.D., +22 , for the C4591001 Clinical Trial
@FromChicagoland @jakescottMD @ajlamesa @highbrow_nobrow The initial mRNA COVID-19 vaccines from Pfizer-BioNTech and Moderna were tested in large-scale, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trials before receiving Emergency Use Authorization (EUA). https://t.co/F8gbvKP4Me 3/3
@GSmackdownmac @DanQCarruthers @JulieMarie1130 @TheChiefNerd Now, what is it you wanna debunk here? Pfizers own appendix?
@GSmackdownmac @DanQCarruthers @JulieMarie1130 @TheChiefNerd What lies? Count the cardiac deaths in the table and compare. Is there a correlation? Well, nobody knows coz nobody fck studied further? But even MORE stroke deaths after they unblinded. 28 vs11 Either way, since covid such low risk Im not gonna FAFO lol https://t.co/UzuSbKBSKR https://t.co/OhyvxFnYzO
@lustjiminnn @bobmarotte I don't know what to tell you, but Reuters doesn't know what they're talking about. https://t.co/fjtts4V4zS https://t.co/RBXxRsLiGj
@grok @ortis78 החיסון לקורונה אינו מונע הדבקה. מקורות: 1. ריאיון - פרופ' גליה רהב https://t.co/Pue0tSW4Tk. 2. דשבורד משרד הבריאות https://t.co/1J4BJpPMra.... 3. Safety and Efficacy of the BNT162b2 mRNA Covid-19 Vaccine https://t.co/k0mZCTlEYR.
@DrCarlHindy @ChuckSteak16187 @SecKennedy The data shows the reverse. In the supplement to the NEJM study reviewing the data (New England Journal of Medicine doi: 10.1056/nejmoa2110345) we see 5 deaths from cardiovascular arrest/failure but only 1 in the placebo group, consistent with known vax damage to the heart. https://t.co/qBElfvzmGr
@IrnBoru @SarahLarchmont @_d3f4ult You are conveniently forgetting that thousands were dying every day at the height of Covid. Please read this: Safety and Efficacy of the BNT162b2 mRNA Covid-19 Vaccine | New England Journal of Medicine https://t.co/17TwP1FoIF
RT @nyx_aim: @Zilosophy_4all @iAnonPatriot Want more? https://t.co/LIAxGLh68F https://t.co/VpUZV5mjTs https://t.co/b8LyHV8GSq https://…
@Zilosophy_4all @iAnonPatriot Want more? https://t.co/LIAxGLh68F https://t.co/VpUZV5mjTs https://t.co/b8LyHV8GSq https://t.co/jDYS9K2Ayb
@crazycornishcr1 @RavuSpeaks @RapidResponse47 @SecKennedy @RonWyden Polack, F. P., et al. (2020). "Safety and Efficacy of the BNT162b2 mRNA Covid-19 Vaccine." New England Journal of Medicine, 383(27), 2603-2615. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa2034577.
@dlbeard @Renee_the_gram @cspan @RonWyden @SecKennedy @grok Polack, F. P., et al. (2020). "Safety and Efficacy of the BNT162b2 mRNA Covid-19 Vaccine." New England Journal of Medicine, 383(27), 2603-2615. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa2034577.
@Jordaninmt @bigbird3420 @Lindsey121985 @DeezyHVNZ @JohnStrandUSA https://t.co/E74jfI6ZYd If you actually want to read the study https://t.co/acAXY1POto
@wtfigowts @ScottAdamsSays @grok Link 2 https://t.co/ICkmcl3xlL
@wtfigowts @ScottAdamsSays @grok The excel spreadsheet is a breakdown of the 2 month and 6 month trial results. Recall the 2 month data was released late 2020 prior to the EUA authorization. The 6 month data later, prior to the (Pfizer) August 2021 BLA. https://t.co/3idgy2QFQr https://t.co/ICkmcl3xlL
@RepAndyBiggsAZ @SecKennedy To write (or say), “The Covid-19 vaccine was untested, unsafe, and ineffective” is to write a lie, to whit - Safety and Efficacy of the BNT162b2 mRNA Covid-19 Vaccine, published Dec 31, 2020 https://t.co/JoQE6m0TGB (Blue = cases of COVID-19 v time; red = vaccinated) https://t.co/gme4zmGGgc
@likitysplit50 @MAGAMANATX @TheChiefNerd 1. Polack FP, Thomas SJ, Kitchin N, et al. Safety and Efficacy of the BNT162b2 mRNA Covid-19 Vaccine. N Engl J Med 2020; 383:2603.
@craigthomler @groovyedu @TheChiefNerd Sorry i had to look through a bunch of different documents. This was the 6 month report. It got worse the further you go out. https://t.co/tYf3pvItw6 Look on the last page. Table s4 https://t.co/DMcIeJ2kYk
@StevenMBelknap @ScottAdamsSays https://t.co/aP97PKG6iM
RT @Lagunita82: More deaths in the vaccinated group. https://t.co/3JgSbTGziJ
RT @Lagunita82: More deaths in the vaccinated group. https://t.co/3JgSbTGziJ
@phenn @MansurQr @RepMTG 1. Thomas SJ, Moreira ED Jr, Kitchin N, et al. Safety and Efficacy of the BNT162b2 mRNA Covid-19 Vaccine through 6 Months. N Engl J Med 2021; 385:1761.
@phenn @MansurQr @RepMTG 1. Polack FP, Thomas SJ, Kitchin N, et al. Safety and Efficacy of the BNT162b2 mRNA Covid-19 Vaccine. N Engl J Med 2020; 383:2603.
Safety and Efficacy of the BNT162b2 mRNA Covid-19 Vaccine | New England Journal of Medicine https://t.co/1tHuWSZ6ce
RT @CpfcGal08: Mr Cartland! Top tip, read the full research highlighted in the medRxiv that you shared, that you didnt read.! This resea…
@tGltltFQB0Jis9P Polack FP, Thomas SJ, Kitchin N, et al. Safety and efficacy of the BNT162b2 mRNA Covid-19 vaccine. N Engl J Med. 2020;383(27):2603-2615. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa2034577.
Mr Cartland! Top tip, read the full research highlighted in the medRxiv that you shared, that you didnt read.! This research supports the safety and efficacy of covid vax. Research and Nct below. Cheers @CartlandDavid
RT @Lagunita82: More deaths in the vaccinated group. https://t.co/3JgSbTGziJ
RT @Lagunita82: More deaths in the vaccinated group. https://t.co/3JgSbTGziJ
Efficacy of BNT162b2 vaccine against COVID-19 after the first dose, from "Safety and Efficacy of the BNT162b2 mRNA Covid-19 Vaccine" published in the The New England Journal of Medicine (nejm.org/doi/full/10....), and the xkcd comic inspired by it (xkcd.com/2400/).
Efficacy of BNT162b2 vaccine against COVID-19 after the first dose, from "Safety and Efficacy of the BNT162b2 mRNA Covid-19 Vaccine" published in the The New England Journal of Medicine (https://t.co/nRWNddozIo), and the xkcd comic inspired by it (https://t.co/jNGYzKg72U). https://t.co/o25XpaAAa1 https://t.co/NMqsf3wUYp
RT @Lagunita82: More deaths in the vaccinated group. https://t.co/3JgSbTGziJ
RT @Lagunita82: More deaths in the vaccinated group. https://t.co/3JgSbTGziJ
RT @Lagunita82: More deaths in the vaccinated group. https://t.co/3JgSbTGziJ
RT @Lagunita82: More deaths in the vaccinated group. https://t.co/3JgSbTGziJ
@StevenMBelknap @TheUltimateSean @ScottAdamsSays The study clearly states it was randomized, observer blind, placebo controlled. The citation: Polack, Fernando P et al. “Safety and Efficacy of the BNT162b2 mRNA Covid-19 Vaccine.” The New England journal of medicine vol. 383,27 (2020): 2603-2615. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa2034577
RT @Lagunita82: More deaths in the vaccinated group. https://t.co/3JgSbTGziJ
RT @Lagunita82: More deaths in the vaccinated group. https://t.co/3JgSbTGziJ
RT @Lagunita82: More deaths in the vaccinated group. https://t.co/3JgSbTGziJ
RT @Lagunita82: More deaths in the vaccinated group. https://t.co/3JgSbTGziJ
RT @Lagunita82: More deaths in the vaccinated group. https://t.co/3JgSbTGziJ
RT @Lagunita82: More deaths in the vaccinated group. https://t.co/3JgSbTGziJ
RT @Lagunita82: More deaths in the vaccinated group. https://t.co/3JgSbTGziJ
RT @Lagunita82: More deaths in the vaccinated group. https://t.co/3JgSbTGziJ
RT @Lagunita82: More deaths in the vaccinated group. https://t.co/3JgSbTGziJ
RT @Lagunita82: More deaths in the vaccinated group. https://t.co/3JgSbTGziJ
RT @Lagunita82: More deaths in the vaccinated group. https://t.co/3JgSbTGziJ
RT @Lagunita82: More deaths in the vaccinated group. https://t.co/3JgSbTGziJ
RT @Lagunita82: More deaths in the vaccinated group. https://t.co/3JgSbTGziJ
RT @snarevox: another study in the new england journal of medicine showing more deaths in the vaccinated group.. there was supposed to be…
RT @Lagunita82: More deaths in the vaccinated group. https://t.co/3JgSbTGziJ
RT @Lagunita82: More deaths in the vaccinated group. https://t.co/3JgSbTGziJ
RT @Lagunita82: More deaths in the vaccinated group. https://t.co/3JgSbTGziJ
RT @Lagunita82: More deaths in the vaccinated group. https://t.co/3JgSbTGziJ
RT @Lagunita82: More deaths in the vaccinated group. https://t.co/3JgSbTGziJ
RT @Lagunita82: More deaths in the vaccinated group. https://t.co/3JgSbTGziJ
RT @Lagunita82: More deaths in the vaccinated group. https://t.co/3JgSbTGziJ
RT @Lagunita82: More deaths in the vaccinated group. https://t.co/3JgSbTGziJ
RT @Lagunita82: More deaths in the vaccinated group. https://t.co/3JgSbTGziJ
RT @Lagunita82: More deaths in the vaccinated group. https://t.co/3JgSbTGziJ
RT @Lagunita82: More deaths in the vaccinated group. https://t.co/3JgSbTGziJ
RT @Lagunita82: More deaths in the vaccinated group. https://t.co/3JgSbTGziJ
RT @Lagunita82: More deaths in the vaccinated group. https://t.co/3JgSbTGziJ
RT @Lagunita82: More deaths in the vaccinated group. https://t.co/3JgSbTGziJ
RT @Lagunita82: More deaths in the vaccinated group. https://t.co/3JgSbTGziJ
RT @Lagunita82: More deaths in the vaccinated group. https://t.co/3JgSbTGziJ
RT @Lagunita82: More deaths in the vaccinated group. https://t.co/3JgSbTGziJ
RT @Lagunita82: More deaths in the vaccinated group. https://t.co/3JgSbTGziJ
RT @Lagunita82: More deaths in the vaccinated group. https://t.co/3JgSbTGziJ
RT @Lagunita82: More deaths in the vaccinated group. https://t.co/3JgSbTGziJ
RT @Lagunita82: More deaths in the vaccinated group. https://t.co/3JgSbTGziJ
RT @Lagunita82: More deaths in the vaccinated group. https://t.co/3JgSbTGziJ
RT @Lagunita82: More deaths in the vaccinated group. https://t.co/3JgSbTGziJ
RT @Lagunita82: More deaths in the vaccinated group. https://t.co/3JgSbTGziJ
RT @Lagunita82: More deaths in the vaccinated group. https://t.co/3JgSbTGziJ
RT @Lagunita82: More deaths in the vaccinated group. https://t.co/3JgSbTGziJ
RT @Lagunita82: More deaths in the vaccinated group. https://t.co/3JgSbTGziJ
RT @Lagunita82: More deaths in the vaccinated group. https://t.co/3JgSbTGziJ
RT @Lagunita82: More deaths in the vaccinated group. https://t.co/3JgSbTGziJ
RT @Lagunita82: More deaths in the vaccinated group. https://t.co/3JgSbTGziJ
another study in the new england journal of medicine showing more deaths in the vaccinated group.. there was supposed to be to be 2 year follow up data, but after six months they gave the control group the vaccine and thereby destroyed it. https://t.co/ZoBGZZbuku
RT @Lagunita82: More deaths in the vaccinated group. https://t.co/3JgSbTGziJ
RT @Lagunita82: More deaths in the vaccinated group. https://t.co/3JgSbTGziJ
RT @Lagunita82: More deaths in the vaccinated group. https://t.co/3JgSbTGziJ
RT @Lagunita82: More deaths in the vaccinated group. https://t.co/3JgSbTGziJ
RT @Lagunita82: More deaths in the vaccinated group. https://t.co/3JgSbTGziJ
RT @Lagunita82: More deaths in the vaccinated group. https://t.co/3JgSbTGziJ
RT @Lagunita82: More deaths in the vaccinated group. https://t.co/3JgSbTGziJ
RT @Lagunita82: More deaths in the vaccinated group. https://t.co/3JgSbTGziJ
RT @Lagunita82: More deaths in the vaccinated group. https://t.co/3JgSbTGziJ
RT @Lagunita82: More deaths in the vaccinated group. https://t.co/3JgSbTGziJ
RT @Lagunita82: More deaths in the vaccinated group. https://t.co/3JgSbTGziJ
RT @Lagunita82: More deaths in the vaccinated group. https://t.co/3JgSbTGziJ
RT @Lagunita82: More deaths in the vaccinated group. https://t.co/3JgSbTGziJ
RT @Lagunita82: More deaths in the vaccinated group. https://t.co/3JgSbTGziJ
RT @Lagunita82: More deaths in the vaccinated group. https://t.co/3JgSbTGziJ
RT @Lagunita82: More deaths in the vaccinated group. https://t.co/3JgSbTGziJ
RT @Lagunita82: More deaths in the vaccinated group. https://t.co/3JgSbTGziJ
RT @Lagunita82: More deaths in the vaccinated group. https://t.co/3JgSbTGziJ
RT @Lagunita82: More deaths in the vaccinated group. https://t.co/3JgSbTGziJ
RT @Lagunita82: More deaths in the vaccinated group. https://t.co/3JgSbTGziJ
RT @Lagunita82: More deaths in the vaccinated group. https://t.co/3JgSbTGziJ
RT @Lagunita82: More deaths in the vaccinated group. https://t.co/3JgSbTGziJ
RT @Lagunita82: More deaths in the vaccinated group. https://t.co/3JgSbTGziJ
RT @Lagunita82: More deaths in the vaccinated group. https://t.co/3JgSbTGziJ
RT @Lagunita82: More deaths in the vaccinated group. https://t.co/3JgSbTGziJ
RT @Lagunita82: More deaths in the vaccinated group. https://t.co/3JgSbTGziJ
RT @Lagunita82: More deaths in the vaccinated group. https://t.co/3JgSbTGziJ
Safety and Efficacy of the BNT162b2 mRNA Covid-19 Vaccine | New England Journal of Medicine https://t.co/XkidKR4zqB https://t.co/G2i8351sfw https://t.co/pYp8Prel36
@Danielthmanyall @25_cycle @simonmaechling Both Pfizer-BioNTech and Moderna vaccines had large Phase I–III trials with tens of thousands of participants, evaluated for safety, immunogenicity, and efficacy. Ref: Polack FP et al., NEJM 2020 — “Safety and Efficacy of the BNT162b2 mRNA COVID-19 Vaccine” —
@SteigstraHerman @PolderPaleo Safety and Efficacy of the BNT162b2 mRNA Covid-19 Vaccine, ik vond voorgaande studie via https://t.co/ByvMrbP8Z2. Ik hoop dat je daarmee iets kunt.
RT @SHomburg: Lassen Sie sich keine Märchen auftischen: Pfizers riesige RCT-Zulassungsstudie ergab nur einen Schutz vor positivem PCR-Test.…
RT @SHomburg: Lassen Sie sich keine Märchen auftischen: Pfizers riesige RCT-Zulassungsstudie ergab nur einen Schutz vor positivem PCR-Test.…
@RootyRootbrian @MatersTightHole @Waltika @DrNeilStone Actually it's the Pfizer trial -interesting that COVIDian morons didn't recognise it? Did you inject yourself for some free fries
Safety and Efficacy of the BNT162b2 mRNA Covid-19 Vaccine through 6 Months BNT162b2 mRNA COVID-19ワクチンの6ヶ月間の安全性と有効性 pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC...
@Asteroid_Now @BradBanko @jeffreyatucker Safety and Efficacy of the BNT162b2 mRNA Covid-19 Vaccine, NEJM, December 10, 2020. The article will claim safe, but the AC-SAE data (127 vs. 116) shows this was not proven. Furthermore, the AC-SAE data shows a red flag. Which the authors and FDA ignored (no surprise).
46. 21. General Vaccine Safety, Effectiveness & Platforms Polack, F.P. et al. (2020). Safety and efficacy of the BNT162b2 mRNA COVID-19 vaccine. New England Journal of Medicine. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa2034577 (PubMed)
@CannonofBannon @BreezerGalway @Alex_on_A14 @jneill @CowboySkater @TakethatCt @myhiddenvalue The titles of the papers are different + state the different vaccines they are about. You lied about them being on the same vaccine to avoid addressing their contents. "Safety and Efficacy of the BNT162b2 mRNA Covid-19 Vaccine" https://t.co/gFcGqlqC05 https://t.co/b87PfMezFT https://t.co/75lLA7A1o2
RT @SHomburg: Lassen Sie sich keine Märchen auftischen: Pfizers riesige RCT-Zulassungsstudie ergab nur einen Schutz vor positivem PCR-Test.…
RT @SHomburg: @MartMichaelis Das steht weder in Ihrer Quelle, noch in Pfizers Zulassungsstudie. Es ist schlicht eine Lüge, die so lange wie…
@MartMichaelis Das steht weder in Ihrer Quelle, noch in Pfizers Zulassungsstudie. Es ist schlicht eine Lüge, die so lange wiederholt wird, bis jeder es glaubt. https://t.co/67y8ZysoVR
RT @SHomburg: Lassen Sie sich keine Märchen auftischen: Pfizers riesige RCT-Zulassungsstudie ergab nur einen Schutz vor positivem PCR-Test.…
RT @SHomburg: Lassen Sie sich keine Märchen auftischen: Pfizers riesige RCT-Zulassungsstudie ergab nur einen Schutz vor positivem PCR-Test.…
RT @SHomburg: Lassen Sie sich keine Märchen auftischen: Pfizers riesige RCT-Zulassungsstudie ergab nur einen Schutz vor positivem PCR-Test.…
RT @SHomburg: Lassen Sie sich keine Märchen auftischen: Pfizers riesige RCT-Zulassungsstudie ergab nur einen Schutz vor positivem PCR-Test.…
RT @SHomburg: Lassen Sie sich keine Märchen auftischen: Pfizers riesige RCT-Zulassungsstudie ergab nur einen Schutz vor positivem PCR-Test.…
RT @SHomburg: Lassen Sie sich keine Märchen auftischen: Pfizers riesige RCT-Zulassungsstudie ergab nur einen Schutz vor positivem PCR-Test.…
RT @SHomburg: Lassen Sie sich keine Märchen auftischen: Pfizers riesige RCT-Zulassungsstudie ergab nur einen Schutz vor positivem PCR-Test.…
RT @SHomburg: Lassen Sie sich keine Märchen auftischen: Pfizers riesige RCT-Zulassungsstudie ergab nur einen Schutz vor positivem PCR-Test.…
RT @SHomburg: Lassen Sie sich keine Märchen auftischen: Pfizers riesige RCT-Zulassungsstudie ergab nur einen Schutz vor positivem PCR-Test.…
@RyuichiYoneyama BioNTech およびPfizerの支援を受けています。 BNT162b2 mRNA COVID-19ワクチンの6ヶ月間の安全性と有効性 2021年9月15日公開 Safety and Efficacy of the BNT162b2 mRNA Covid-19 Vaccine through 6 Months | New England Journal of Medicine https://t.co/0MXTq2JtdK https://t.co/84k0hGkj9G https://t.co/YTWm30nCCG
RT @SHomburg: Lassen Sie sich keine Märchen auftischen: Pfizers riesige RCT-Zulassungsstudie ergab nur einen Schutz vor positivem PCR-Test.…
RT @haitatsuingoro: @fcOpaleye @yuya1209369 > …全くエビデンスが… 新型コロナウイルス(SARS-CoV-2)のワクチンの有効性を示す論文を11どうぞ。さぁ、反証してください。 その1: Polack, F. P., et al.…
RT @SHomburg: Lassen Sie sich keine Märchen auftischen: Pfizers riesige RCT-Zulassungsstudie ergab nur einen Schutz vor positivem PCR-Test.…
RT @haitatsuingoro: @fcOpaleye @yuya1209369 > …全くエビデンスが… 新型コロナウイルス(SARS-CoV-2)のワクチンの有効性を示す論文を11どうぞ。さぁ、反証してください。 その1: Polack, F. P., et al.…
RT @SHomburg: Lassen Sie sich keine Märchen auftischen: Pfizers riesige RCT-Zulassungsstudie ergab nur einen Schutz vor positivem PCR-Test.…
RT @SHomburg: Lassen Sie sich keine Märchen auftischen: Pfizers riesige RCT-Zulassungsstudie ergab nur einen Schutz vor positivem PCR-Test.…
RT @SHomburg: Lassen Sie sich keine Märchen auftischen: Pfizers riesige RCT-Zulassungsstudie ergab nur einen Schutz vor positivem PCR-Test.…
@MyCup0verFlows @DrNeilStone 1. Thomas SJ, Moreira ED Jr, Kitchin N, et al. Safety and Efficacy of the BNT162b2 mRNA Covid-19 Vaccine through 6 Months. N Engl J Med 2021; 385:1761.
@MyCup0verFlows @DrNeilStone 1. Polack FP, Thomas SJ, Kitchin N, et al. Safety and Efficacy of the BNT162b2 mRNA Covid-19 Vaccine. N Engl J Med 2020; 383:2603.
RT @SHomburg: Lassen Sie sich keine Märchen auftischen: Pfizers riesige RCT-Zulassungsstudie ergab nur einen Schutz vor positivem PCR-Test.…
RT @SHomburg: Lassen Sie sich keine Märchen auftischen: Pfizers riesige RCT-Zulassungsstudie ergab nur einen Schutz vor positivem PCR-Test.…
@fcOpaleye @yuya1209369 > …全くエビデンスが… 新型コロナウイルス(SARS-CoV-2)のワクチンの有効性を示す論文を11どうぞ。さぁ、反証してください。 その1: Polack, F. P., et al. (2020). "Safety and Efficacy of the BNT162b2 mRNA Covid-19 Vaccine." New England Journal of Medicine, 383(27), 2603-2615.
RT @SHomburg: Lassen Sie sich keine Märchen auftischen: Pfizers riesige RCT-Zulassungsstudie ergab nur einen Schutz vor positivem PCR-Test.…
RT @SHomburg: Lassen Sie sich keine Märchen auftischen: Pfizers riesige RCT-Zulassungsstudie ergab nur einen Schutz vor positivem PCR-Test.…
RT @SHomburg: Lassen Sie sich keine Märchen auftischen: Pfizers riesige RCT-Zulassungsstudie ergab nur einen Schutz vor positivem PCR-Test.…
RT @SHomburg: Lassen Sie sich keine Märchen auftischen: Pfizers riesige RCT-Zulassungsstudie ergab nur einen Schutz vor positivem PCR-Test.…
RT @SHomburg: Lassen Sie sich keine Märchen auftischen: Pfizers riesige RCT-Zulassungsstudie ergab nur einen Schutz vor positivem PCR-Test.…
RT @SHomburg: Lassen Sie sich keine Märchen auftischen: Pfizers riesige RCT-Zulassungsstudie ergab nur einen Schutz vor positivem PCR-Test.…
RT @SHomburg: Lassen Sie sich keine Märchen auftischen: Pfizers riesige RCT-Zulassungsstudie ergab nur einen Schutz vor positivem PCR-Test.…
RT @SHomburg: Lassen Sie sich keine Märchen auftischen: Pfizers riesige RCT-Zulassungsstudie ergab nur einen Schutz vor positivem PCR-Test.…
RT @SHomburg: Lassen Sie sich keine Märchen auftischen: Pfizers riesige RCT-Zulassungsstudie ergab nur einen Schutz vor positivem PCR-Test.…
RT @SHomburg: Lassen Sie sich keine Märchen auftischen: Pfizers riesige RCT-Zulassungsstudie ergab nur einen Schutz vor positivem PCR-Test.…
RT @SHomburg: Lassen Sie sich keine Märchen auftischen: Pfizers riesige RCT-Zulassungsstudie ergab nur einen Schutz vor positivem PCR-Test.…
RT @SHomburg: Lassen Sie sich keine Märchen auftischen: Pfizers riesige RCT-Zulassungsstudie ergab nur einen Schutz vor positivem PCR-Test.…
RT @SHomburg: Lassen Sie sich keine Märchen auftischen: Pfizers riesige RCT-Zulassungsstudie ergab nur einen Schutz vor positivem PCR-Test.…
RT @SHomburg: Lassen Sie sich keine Märchen auftischen: Pfizers riesige RCT-Zulassungsstudie ergab nur einen Schutz vor positivem PCR-Test.…
RT @SHomburg: Lassen Sie sich keine Märchen auftischen: Pfizers riesige RCT-Zulassungsstudie ergab nur einen Schutz vor positivem PCR-Test.…
RT @SHomburg: Lassen Sie sich keine Märchen auftischen: Pfizers riesige RCT-Zulassungsstudie ergab nur einen Schutz vor positivem PCR-Test.…
RT @SHomburg: Lassen Sie sich keine Märchen auftischen: Pfizers riesige RCT-Zulassungsstudie ergab nur einen Schutz vor positivem PCR-Test.…
RT @SHomburg: Lassen Sie sich keine Märchen auftischen: Pfizers riesige RCT-Zulassungsstudie ergab nur einen Schutz vor positivem PCR-Test.…
RT @SHomburg: Lassen Sie sich keine Märchen auftischen: Pfizers riesige RCT-Zulassungsstudie ergab nur einen Schutz vor positivem PCR-Test.…
RT @SHomburg: Lassen Sie sich keine Märchen auftischen: Pfizers riesige RCT-Zulassungsstudie ergab nur einen Schutz vor positivem PCR-Test.…
RT @SHomburg: Lassen Sie sich keine Märchen auftischen: Pfizers riesige RCT-Zulassungsstudie ergab nur einen Schutz vor positivem PCR-Test.…
@ExistentialEnso he's absolutely wrong Key Sources: WHO on mRNA vaccine safety CDC mRNA Vaccine Safety Data NEJM: “Safety and Efficacy of the BNT162b2 mRNA Covid‑19 Vaccine”
RT @SHomburg: Lassen Sie sich keine Märchen auftischen: Pfizers riesige RCT-Zulassungsstudie ergab nur einen Schutz vor positivem PCR-Test.…
RT @SHomburg: Lassen Sie sich keine Märchen auftischen: Pfizers riesige RCT-Zulassungsstudie ergab nur einen Schutz vor positivem PCR-Test.…
RT @SHomburg: Lassen Sie sich keine Märchen auftischen: Pfizers riesige RCT-Zulassungsstudie ergab nur einen Schutz vor positivem PCR-Test.…
RT @SHomburg: Lassen Sie sich keine Märchen auftischen: Pfizers riesige RCT-Zulassungsstudie ergab nur einen Schutz vor positivem PCR-Test.…
RT @SHomburg: Lassen Sie sich keine Märchen auftischen: Pfizers riesige RCT-Zulassungsstudie ergab nur einen Schutz vor positivem PCR-Test.…
RT @SHomburg: Lassen Sie sich keine Märchen auftischen: Pfizers riesige RCT-Zulassungsstudie ergab nur einen Schutz vor positivem PCR-Test.…
RT @SHomburg: Lassen Sie sich keine Märchen auftischen: Pfizers riesige RCT-Zulassungsstudie ergab nur einen Schutz vor positivem PCR-Test.…
RT @SHomburg: Lassen Sie sich keine Märchen auftischen: Pfizers riesige RCT-Zulassungsstudie ergab nur einen Schutz vor positivem PCR-Test.…
RT @SHomburg: Lassen Sie sich keine Märchen auftischen: Pfizers riesige RCT-Zulassungsstudie ergab nur einen Schutz vor positivem PCR-Test.…
RT @SHomburg: Lassen Sie sich keine Märchen auftischen: Pfizers riesige RCT-Zulassungsstudie ergab nur einen Schutz vor positivem PCR-Test.…
RT @SHomburg: Lassen Sie sich keine Märchen auftischen: Pfizers riesige RCT-Zulassungsstudie ergab nur einen Schutz vor positivem PCR-Test.…
RT @SHomburg: Lassen Sie sich keine Märchen auftischen: Pfizers riesige RCT-Zulassungsstudie ergab nur einen Schutz vor positivem PCR-Test.…
RT @SHomburg: Lassen Sie sich keine Märchen auftischen: Pfizers riesige RCT-Zulassungsstudie ergab nur einen Schutz vor positivem PCR-Test.…
RT @SHomburg: Lassen Sie sich keine Märchen auftischen: Pfizers riesige RCT-Zulassungsstudie ergab nur einen Schutz vor positivem PCR-Test.…
RT @SHomburg: Lassen Sie sich keine Märchen auftischen: Pfizers riesige RCT-Zulassungsstudie ergab nur einen Schutz vor positivem PCR-Test.…
RT @SHomburg: Lassen Sie sich keine Märchen auftischen: Pfizers riesige RCT-Zulassungsstudie ergab nur einen Schutz vor positivem PCR-Test.…
RT @SHomburg: Lassen Sie sich keine Märchen auftischen: Pfizers riesige RCT-Zulassungsstudie ergab nur einen Schutz vor positivem PCR-Test.…
RT @SHomburg: Lassen Sie sich keine Märchen auftischen: Pfizers riesige RCT-Zulassungsstudie ergab nur einen Schutz vor positivem PCR-Test.…
RT @SHomburg: Lassen Sie sich keine Märchen auftischen: Pfizers riesige RCT-Zulassungsstudie ergab nur einen Schutz vor positivem PCR-Test.…
RT @SHomburg: Lassen Sie sich keine Märchen auftischen: Pfizers riesige RCT-Zulassungsstudie ergab nur einen Schutz vor positivem PCR-Test.…
RT @SHomburg: Lassen Sie sich keine Märchen auftischen: Pfizers riesige RCT-Zulassungsstudie ergab nur einen Schutz vor positivem PCR-Test.…
RT @SHomburg: Lassen Sie sich keine Märchen auftischen: Pfizers riesige RCT-Zulassungsstudie ergab nur einen Schutz vor positivem PCR-Test.…
RT @SHomburg: Lassen Sie sich keine Märchen auftischen: Pfizers riesige RCT-Zulassungsstudie ergab nur einen Schutz vor positivem PCR-Test.…
RT @SHomburg: Lassen Sie sich keine Märchen auftischen: Pfizers riesige RCT-Zulassungsstudie ergab nur einen Schutz vor positivem PCR-Test.…
RT @SHomburg: Lassen Sie sich keine Märchen auftischen: Pfizers riesige RCT-Zulassungsstudie ergab nur einen Schutz vor positivem PCR-Test.…
RT @SHomburg: Lassen Sie sich keine Märchen auftischen: Pfizers riesige RCT-Zulassungsstudie ergab nur einen Schutz vor positivem PCR-Test.…
RT @SHomburg: Lassen Sie sich keine Märchen auftischen: Pfizers riesige RCT-Zulassungsstudie ergab nur einen Schutz vor positivem PCR-Test.…
@NaftanCNMI @simonmaechling 1. Polack FP, Thomas SJ, Kitchin N, et al. Safety and Efficacy of the BNT162b2 mRNA Covid-19 Vaccine. N Engl J Med 2020; 383:2603.
RT @SHomburg: Lassen Sie sich keine Märchen auftischen: Pfizers riesige RCT-Zulassungsstudie ergab nur einen Schutz vor positivem PCR-Test.…
RT @SHomburg: Lassen Sie sich keine Märchen auftischen: Pfizers riesige RCT-Zulassungsstudie ergab nur einen Schutz vor positivem PCR-Test.…
RT @SHomburg: Lassen Sie sich keine Märchen auftischen: Pfizers riesige RCT-Zulassungsstudie ergab nur einen Schutz vor positivem PCR-Test.…
RT @SHomburg: Lassen Sie sich keine Märchen auftischen: Pfizers riesige RCT-Zulassungsstudie ergab nur einen Schutz vor positivem PCR-Test.…
RT @SHomburg: Lassen Sie sich keine Märchen auftischen: Pfizers riesige RCT-Zulassungsstudie ergab nur einen Schutz vor positivem PCR-Test.…
RT @SHomburg: Lassen Sie sich keine Märchen auftischen: Pfizers riesige RCT-Zulassungsstudie ergab nur einen Schutz vor positivem PCR-Test.…
RT @SHomburg: Lassen Sie sich keine Märchen auftischen: Pfizers riesige RCT-Zulassungsstudie ergab nur einen Schutz vor positivem PCR-Test.…
RT @SHomburg: Lassen Sie sich keine Märchen auftischen: Pfizers riesige RCT-Zulassungsstudie ergab nur einen Schutz vor positivem PCR-Test.…
RT @SHomburg: Lassen Sie sich keine Märchen auftischen: Pfizers riesige RCT-Zulassungsstudie ergab nur einen Schutz vor positivem PCR-Test.…
RT @SHomburg: Lassen Sie sich keine Märchen auftischen: Pfizers riesige RCT-Zulassungsstudie ergab nur einen Schutz vor positivem PCR-Test.…
RT @SHomburg: Lassen Sie sich keine Märchen auftischen: Pfizers riesige RCT-Zulassungsstudie ergab nur einen Schutz vor positivem PCR-Test.…
RT @SHomburg: Lassen Sie sich keine Märchen auftischen: Pfizers riesige RCT-Zulassungsstudie ergab nur einen Schutz vor positivem PCR-Test.…
RT @SHomburg: Lassen Sie sich keine Märchen auftischen: Pfizers riesige RCT-Zulassungsstudie ergab nur einen Schutz vor positivem PCR-Test.…
RT @SHomburg: Lassen Sie sich keine Märchen auftischen: Pfizers riesige RCT-Zulassungsstudie ergab nur einen Schutz vor positivem PCR-Test.…
RT @SHomburg: Lassen Sie sich keine Märchen auftischen: Pfizers riesige RCT-Zulassungsstudie ergab nur einen Schutz vor positivem PCR-Test.…
RT @SHomburg: Lassen Sie sich keine Märchen auftischen: Pfizers riesige RCT-Zulassungsstudie ergab nur einen Schutz vor positivem PCR-Test.…
RT @SHomburg: Lassen Sie sich keine Märchen auftischen: Pfizers riesige RCT-Zulassungsstudie ergab nur einen Schutz vor positivem PCR-Test.…
RT @SHomburg: Lassen Sie sich keine Märchen auftischen: Pfizers riesige RCT-Zulassungsstudie ergab nur einen Schutz vor positivem PCR-Test.…
RT @SHomburg: Lassen Sie sich keine Märchen auftischen: Pfizers riesige RCT-Zulassungsstudie ergab nur einen Schutz vor positivem PCR-Test.…
RT @SHomburg: Lassen Sie sich keine Märchen auftischen: Pfizers riesige RCT-Zulassungsstudie ergab nur einen Schutz vor positivem PCR-Test.…
RT @SHomburg: Lassen Sie sich keine Märchen auftischen: Pfizers riesige RCT-Zulassungsstudie ergab nur einen Schutz vor positivem PCR-Test.…
RT @SHomburg: Lassen Sie sich keine Märchen auftischen: Pfizers riesige RCT-Zulassungsstudie ergab nur einen Schutz vor positivem PCR-Test.…
RT @SHomburg: Lassen Sie sich keine Märchen auftischen: Pfizers riesige RCT-Zulassungsstudie ergab nur einen Schutz vor positivem PCR-Test.…
RT @SHomburg: Lassen Sie sich keine Märchen auftischen: Pfizers riesige RCT-Zulassungsstudie ergab nur einen Schutz vor positivem PCR-Test.…
RT @SHomburg: Lassen Sie sich keine Märchen auftischen: Pfizers riesige RCT-Zulassungsstudie ergab nur einen Schutz vor positivem PCR-Test.…
RT @SHomburg: Lassen Sie sich keine Märchen auftischen: Pfizers riesige RCT-Zulassungsstudie ergab nur einen Schutz vor positivem PCR-Test.…
RT @SHomburg: Lassen Sie sich keine Märchen auftischen: Pfizers riesige RCT-Zulassungsstudie ergab nur einen Schutz vor positivem PCR-Test.…
RT @SHomburg: Lassen Sie sich keine Märchen auftischen: Pfizers riesige RCT-Zulassungsstudie ergab nur einen Schutz vor positivem PCR-Test.…
@Madden9007 @grreymage @DrNeilStone @MakisMD 1. Thomas SJ, Moreira ED Jr, Kitchin N, et al. Safety and Efficacy of the BNT162b2 mRNA Covid-19 Vaccine through 6 Months. N Engl J Med 2021; 385:1761.
@Madden9007 @grreymage @DrNeilStone @MakisMD 1. Polack FP, Thomas SJ, Kitchin N, et al. Safety and Efficacy of the BNT162b2 mRNA Covid-19 Vaccine. N Engl J Med 2020; 383:2603.
@SecKennedy Phase 2/3 trials (C4591001) where 20.3% of participants reported one or more underlying diseases. "Safety and Efficacy of the BNT162b2 mRNA Covid-19 Vaccine" published on Dec. 31, 2020. This means the remaining 79.7% were healthy and not immuno-compromised.
Subsequent rat studies that showed Comirnaty was safe for rats, too, proves that Safety and Efficacy of the BNT162b2 mRNA Covid-19 Vaccine wasn't a phase 3 trial and wasn't complete. Somehow.
He's still insisting that Safety and Efficacy of the BNT162b2 mRNA Covid-19 Vaccine, with 43,548 participants, which was what the vaccine's approval was based on in 149 countries, wasn't a Phase 3 trial.
@RoivainenJukka @TerveysMarika
@HibernatingSG @RebelACole @ajlamesa @grok Debunked my ass & it does not matter what grok says - I have seen the documentation. It's 127 to 116 BTW. See for yourself - "Safety and Efficacy of the BNT162b2 mRNA Covid-19 Vaccine through 6 Months" (Supplementary Appendix)
@masterfocus @ivanildoiii Oh não, desculpa, você vai passar vergonha, o estudo teve acompanhamento contínuo e confirmou a eficácia: https://t.co/oHt6jzU2vH Na próxima pede pro GPT pesquisar se houve atualização antes de querer trazer conclusões que supostamente concordam com seus delírios.
@BreakingNewsFi2 @rmanzel843391 @sbABetterLeader Sure. Now you tell me why a vaccine with almost full protection against COVID and even greater protection against the worst symptoms isn't worth it when there's a .1% adverse reaction rate, the bulk of which are entirely treatable https://t.co/MakD2zT8Ea https://t.co/zvV1d8TlFb
@Gurhal1 @barriere_dr Pas en "double blind", juste "observer blinded" énorme biais ==> poubelle Safety and Efficacy of the BNT162b2 mRNA Covid-19 Vaccine | New England Journal of Medicine https://t.co/cBYrRbvcMJ Methods In an ongoing multinational, placebo-controlled, observer-blinded
@DLF_31 @silvano_trotta 1/3 Polack, F. P., et al. (2020). “Safety and Efficacy of the BNT162b2 mRNA Covid-19 Vaccine.” New England Journal of Medicine, 383(27), 2603–2615. DOI : 10.1056/NEJMoa2034577
@VaccineMole @53v3n0fn1n3 @grok @TheLancet This study does not say vaccinated people died at higher rates. Early on, the vaccine was 95% effective at preventing symptomatic COVID 1 week after the first dose Safety and Efficacy of the BNT162b2 mRNA Covid-19 Vaccine https://t.co/4i2pzFDa3k
@detleflg @rivm Safety and Efficacy of the BNT162b2 mRNA Covid-19 Vaccine | New England Journal of Medicine
@roxslater @TheChiefNerd The peer-reviewed studies confirming placebo-controlled trials for mRNA vaccines are: 1. Pfizer-BioNTech: "Safety and Efficacy of the BNT162b2 mRNA Covid-19 Vaccine" (New England Journal of Medicine, Dec 9, 2020). 43,448 participants, half placebo, 95% efficacy. 2. Moderna:
@ShaunBMcGarry @outbreakupdates 1. Polack FP, Thomas SJ, Kitchin N, et al. Safety and Efficacy of the BNT162b2 mRNA Covid-19 Vaccine. N Engl J Med 2020; 383:2603.
RT @IntegralAnswers: 10/ References Ages 16–17 (Pfizer Phase 3 Trial)
10/ References Ages 16–17 (Pfizer Phase 3 Trial)
@tomato_farm_pc いいよ…そういうの… コレだろ? やっぱり他のヤツのキリトリじゃねえかw 自分で論文元位把握しとけよw https://t.co/GNyBLORP1W
@Mens_EJN @SlotZuid @GelukzoekerudV https://t.co/mb05O8LUVE https://t.co/ZwTbBjPQQC
@BlairHealt68622 @BCGreenSteve @SaiKate108 Which was tested in placebo controlled trials https://t.co/YMj1nCguoy Safety and Efficacy of the BNT162b2 mRNA Covid-19 Vaccine | New England Journal of Medicine
@BlairHealt68622 @BCGreenSteve @SaiKate108 The COVID vaccine was https://t.co/YMj1nCguoy Safety and Efficacy of the BNT162b2 mRNA Covid-19 Vaccine | New England Journal of Medicine
@BlairHealt68622 @BCGreenSteve @SaiKate108 They absolutely did the correct trials. https://t.co/YMj1nCguoy Safety and Efficacy of the BNT162b2 mRNA Covid-19 Vaccine | New England Journal of Medicine
@reverett1234 @trackingdonald @SecKennedy @CDCgov 1. Thomas SJ, Moreira ED Jr, Kitchin N, et al. Safety and Efficacy of the BNT162b2 mRNA Covid-19 Vaccine through 6 Months. N Engl J Med 2021; 385:1761.
@reverett1234 @trackingdonald @SecKennedy @CDCgov 1. Polack FP, Thomas SJ, Kitchin N, et al. Safety and Efficacy of the BNT162b2 mRNA Covid-19 Vaccine. N Engl J Med 2020; 383:2603.
@WePaisleyCircus @DrNeilStone 1. Thomas SJ, Moreira ED Jr, Kitchin N, et al. Safety and Efficacy of the BNT162b2 mRNA Covid-19 Vaccine through 6 Months. N Engl J Med 2021; 385:1761.
@WePaisleyCircus @DrNeilStone You are a fucking idiot of the highest order. 1. Polack FP, Thomas SJ, Kitchin N, et al. Safety and Efficacy of the BNT162b2 mRNA Covid-19 Vaccine. N Engl J Med 2020; 383:2603.
@BlairHealt68622 @blob1972453 @newstart_2024 They went through all three phases. https://t.co/YMj1nCguoy Safety and Efficacy of the BNT162b2 mRNA Covid-19 Vaccine | New England Journal of Medicine
@v22uta @takunari_ishida Safety and Efficacy of the BNT162b2 mRNA Covid-19 Vaccine BNT162b2 mRNA Covid-19 Vaccine in a Nationwide Mass Vaccination Setting Real-world effectiveness of the mRNA-1273 vaccine against COVID-19: Interim results from a prospective observational cohort study
@BlairHealt68622 @DavidWolfe Yet they did. https://t.co/YMj1nCguoy Safety and Efficacy of the BNT162b2 mRNA Covid-19 Vaccine | New England Journal of Medicine
@BiniKitty @_APWK_ Polack, F. P., et al. (2020). Safety and Efficacy of the BNT162b2 mRNA Covid-19 Vaccine. New England Journal of Medicine, 383(27), 2603–2615. https://t.co/LA5KY8YGXA
@heterodoxtom @DopplerEffect93 @michaeljknowles No it wasn't. And LOL. Why are antivaxxers so stupid and gullible? Go read the paper. Safety and Efficacy of the BNT162b2 mRNA Covid-19 Vaccine | New England Journal of Medicine https://t.co/kI4u4i64Os
Safety and Efficacy of the BNT162b2 mRNA Covid-19 Vaccine | New England Journal of Medicine https://t.co/neYkzIpUTI
@CITW_ @SecKennedy 1. Thomas SJ, Moreira ED Jr, Kitchin N, et al. Safety and Efficacy of the BNT162b2 mRNA Covid-19 Vaccine through 6 Months. N Engl J Med 2021; 385:1761.
@CITW_ @SecKennedy 1. Polack FP, Thomas SJ, Kitchin N, et al. Safety and Efficacy of the BNT162b2 mRNA Covid-19 Vaccine. N Engl J Med 2020; 383:2603.
@IncipitIntus @Michael_Yon @RealAlexJones When addressing questions about mRNA COVID vaccines like Pfizer-BioNTech and Moderna, I primarily reference pivotal clinical trials. For Pfizer-BioNTech, it’s the "Safety and Efficacy of the BNT162b2 mRNA Covid-19 Vaccine" study in the New England Journal of Medicine, showing 95%
@theaterdonnerer @Holginho44 @MedienfuzziShow Im England Journal of Medicine veröffentlicht: „Safety and Efficacy of the BNT162b2 mRNA Covid-19 Vaccine“ (Polack et al., 2020) Über 43.000 Teilnehmer, die randomisiert entweder den Impfstoff oder ein Placebo erhielte. Direkt auf der Website des New England Journal of Medicine.
https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC1114166/?utm_source=chatgpt.com ""A calculated risk": the Salk polio vaccine field trials of 1954 - PMC" [3]: https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMoa2034577?utm_source=chatgpt.com "Safety and Efficacy of the BNT162b2 mRNA Covid-19 (15/17)
risk: the Salk polio vaccine field trials of 1954," Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine ([PMC][2]) * Polack et al., "Safety and Efficacy of the BNT162b2 mRNA Covid‑19 Vaccine," *NEJM*, 2020 ([New England Journal of Medicine][3]) * Joura et al., "A 9‑Valent HPV Vaccine against (12/17)
@cryptokyle_33 @JasonRumley_ @rthrash3 @whaditizzz @ChildrensHD @JennyMcCarthy Polack FP, Thomas SJ, Kitchin N, et al. Safety and Efficacy of the BNT162b2 mRNA Covid-19 Vaccine. N Engl J Med. 2020;383:2603–2615. [https://t.co/d8vnzIyndm]
@ShaunBMcGarry @SailOtisJ24 @DrNeilStone Polack FP, et al. Safety and Efficacy of the BNT162b2 mRNA Covid-19 Vaccine. New England Journal of Medicine. 2020 Efficacy and Safety of the mRNA-1273 SARS-CoV-2 Vaccine. New England Journal of Medicine. 2021 Many more under demand, you could just look for it, dick.
@rwmgn79991 @MoU16T8HBooKZXq @studiocorvo @iC5qmR3b7C60014 @niken_hunter @craneopesan @grok Polack FP, et al. Safety and Efficacy of the BNT162b2 mRNA Covid-19 Vaccine. N Engl J Med, 2020. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2034577 8.
@M_22154 @JasonT28358737 @TheJoddon @DrNeilStone 1. Thomas SJ, Moreira ED Jr, Kitchin N, et al. Safety and Efficacy of the BNT162b2 mRNA Covid-19 Vaccine through 6 Months. N Engl J Med 2021; 385:1761.
@M_22154 @JasonT28358737 @TheJoddon @DrNeilStone 1. Polack FP, Thomas SJ, Kitchin N, et al. Safety and Efficacy of the BNT162b2 mRNA Covid-19 Vaccine. N Engl J Med 2020; 383:2603.
al. "Safety and Efficacy of the BNT162b2 mRNA Covid-19 Vaccine." *The New England Journal of Medicine*, vol. 383, no. 27, 2020, pp. 2603-2615. https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMoa2034577. Thompson, Mark G., et al. (9/12)
@rustbeltmaga @BobBobb660056 1. Thomas SJ, Moreira ED Jr, Kitchin N, et al. Safety and Efficacy of the BNT162b2 mRNA Covid-19 Vaccine through 6 Months. N Engl J Med 2021; 385:1761.
@rustbeltmaga @BobBobb660056 1. Polack FP, Thomas SJ, Kitchin N, et al. Safety and Efficacy of the BNT162b2 mRNA Covid-19 Vaccine. N Engl J Med 2020; 383:2603.
@LaffingMunkyboy @ghackethorn @rustbeltmaga @Keegan59992745 1. Thomas SJ, Moreira ED Jr, Kitchin N, et al. Safety and Efficacy of the BNT162b2 mRNA Covid-19 Vaccine through 6 Months. N Engl J Med 2021; 385:1761.
@LaffingMunkyboy @ghackethorn @rustbeltmaga @Keegan59992745 1. Polack FP, Thomas SJ, Kitchin N, et al. Safety and Efficacy of the BNT162b2 mRNA Covid-19 Vaccine. N Engl J Med 2020; 383:2603.
@KingSlenderNES @locephaly @lxeagle17 Here is one: "Safety and Efficacy of the BNT162b2 mRNA Covid-19 Vaccine" (Published in The New England Journal of Medicine, December 2020) The majority of anti-vaxxers react from an emotional state based on fears, anxieties of perception of little power in their lives.
@tonyamerica1776 @RiverRatOG @yashar @l_e_whyte 1. Polack FP, Thomas SJ, Kitchin N, et al. Safety and Efficacy of the BNT162b2 mRNA Covid-19 Vaccine. N Engl J Med 2020; 383:2603.
@RiverRatOG @odinikaeze @yashar @l_e_whyte 1. Thomas SJ, Moreira ED Jr, Kitchin N, et al. Safety and Efficacy of the BNT162b2 mRNA Covid-19 Vaccine through 6 Months. N Engl J Med 2021; 385:1761.
@RiverRatOG @odinikaeze @yashar @l_e_whyte 1. Polack FP, Thomas SJ, Kitchin N, et al. Safety and Efficacy of the BNT162b2 mRNA Covid-19 Vaccine. N Engl J Med 2020; 383:2603.
@Atreviz @ducavendish @Carius1976 "Safety and Efficacy of the BNT162b2 mRNA Covid-19 Vaccine" Link: https://t.co/r1BuCiq2VM "Efficacy and Safety of the mRNA-1273 SARS-CoV-2 Vaccine" Link: https://t.co/m9ozxATdjW "No Evidence of SARS-CoV-2 Reverse Transcription and Integration into the Human Genome" Link:
@Carius1976 @Atreviz @ducavendish "Safety and Efficacy of the BNT162b2 mRNA Covid-19 Vaccine" Link: https://t.co/r1BuCiq2VM "Efficacy and Safety of the mRNA-1273 SARS-CoV-2 Vaccine" Link: https://t.co/m9ozxATdjW "No Evidence of SARS-CoV-2 Reverse Transcription and Integration into the Human Genome" Link:
@MarvinSkyhorse @VolTraveller @DrNeilStone 1. Thomas SJ, Moreira ED Jr, Kitchin N, et al. Safety and Efficacy of the BNT162b2 mRNA Covid-19 Vaccine through 6 Months. N Engl J Med 2021; 385:1761.
@MarvinSkyhorse @VolTraveller @DrNeilStone Where do anti-vaxx fucktards like you actually live and work? 1. Polack FP, Thomas SJ, Kitchin N, et al. Safety and Efficacy of the BNT162b2 mRNA Covid-19 Vaccine. N Engl J Med 2020; 383:2603.
@ShaunBMcGarry @DrNeilStone 1. Thomas SJ, Moreira ED Jr, Kitchin N, et al. Safety and Efficacy of the BNT162b2 mRNA Covid-19 Vaccine through 6 Months. N Engl J Med 2021; 385:1761.
@ShaunBMcGarry @DrNeilStone 1. Polack FP, Thomas SJ, Kitchin N, et al. Safety and Efficacy of the BNT162b2 mRNA Covid-19 Vaccine. N Engl J Med 2020; 383:2603.
@Jikkyleaks @MarwickAnna @Engineer4Health 1. Polack, F. P., et al. (2020). "Safety and Efficacy of the BNT162b2 mRNA Covid-19 Vaccine." New England Journal of Medicine, 383(27), 2603-2615. RCT Details: Phase 3 RCT for Pfizer-BioNTech (BNT162b2), ~43,000 participants, vaccine vs. placebo. Findings: 95% efficacy
@Kristi3King @Mrbandot1 @acnewsitics 1. Thomas SJ, Moreira ED Jr, Kitchin N, et al. Safety and Efficacy of the BNT162b2 mRNA Covid-19 Vaccine through 6 Months. N Engl J Med 2021; 385:1761.
@Kristi3King @Mrbandot1 @acnewsitics 1. Polack FP, Thomas SJ, Kitchin N, et al. Safety and Efficacy of the BNT162b2 mRNA Covid-19 Vaccine. N Engl J Med 2020; 383:2603.
@grok @carl_jurassic @Jikkyleaks @EMUSBACKAGAIN @kerry_echo @joeyjojojunior_ @elonmusk @EMU Why wasn't absolute risk reduction data provided by Pfizer in the "Safety and Efficacy of the BNT162b2 mRNA Covid-19 vaccine", if FDA guidelines *require* both relative AND absolute risk reduction data? https://t.co/fd4qo2fwur
@Tixe_Atrebla @DoyougrokGary @dezo23 @mcclunkeys @DrNeilStone 1. Thomas SJ, Moreira ED Jr, Kitchin N, et al. Safety and Efficacy of the BNT162b2 mRNA Covid-19 Vaccine through 6 Months. N Engl J Med 2021; 385:1761.
@Tixe_Atrebla @DoyougrokGary @dezo23 @mcclunkeys @DrNeilStone 1. Polack FP, Thomas SJ, Kitchin N, et al. Safety and Efficacy of the BNT162b2 mRNA Covid-19 Vaccine. N Engl J Med 2020; 383:2603.
@BPerroden5798 @WaitingForPerot @BradIsley @RonDobson14 @lpackard 1. Thomas SJ, Moreira ED Jr, Kitchin N, et al. Safety and Efficacy of the BNT162b2 mRNA Covid-19 Vaccine through 6 Months. N Engl J Med 2021; 385:1761.
@BPerroden5798 @WaitingForPerot @BradIsley @RonDobson14 @lpackard 1. Polack FP, Thomas SJ, Kitchin N, et al. Safety and Efficacy of the BNT162b2 mRNA Covid-19 Vaccine. N Engl J Med 2020; 383:2603.
Safety and Efficacy of the BNT162b2 mRNA Covid-19 Vaccine | New England Journal of Medicine https://t.co/rbMaoTVzjs
RT @EricsElectrons: @newstart_2024 @NancyRPearcey “Safety and Efficacy of the BNT162b2 mRNA Covid-19 Vaccine" by Polack et al was a randomi…
RT @EricsElectrons: @newstart_2024 @NancyRPearcey “Safety and Efficacy of the BNT162b2 mRNA Covid-19 Vaccine" by Polack et al was a randomi…
RT @EricsElectrons: @newstart_2024 @NancyRPearcey “Safety and Efficacy of the BNT162b2 mRNA Covid-19 Vaccine" by Polack et al was a randomi…
References
@CLestuzzi @heather_parisi un giudizio di valore piace poco. Si chiama conflitto di interessi sai? Questo invece https://t.co/HpiIvXRaZj è proprio stato pagato da Pfizer: qui come la vedi? Mi rendo conto, mi son reso conto grazie a un ricercatore bravo non solo a ricercare ma anche a spiegare, a
@CLestuzzi @heather_parisi mi pare significativa nell'ambito più generale di un tema delicato: il conflitto di interesse tra ricercatore e case farmaceutiche (qui https://t.co/HpiIvXRaZj ad esempio mi è caduto l'occhio sul fatto che a pagà son stati BioNTech and Pfizer; qui https://t.co/KVZ3TmvfYB il
@SonoilCdS @heather_parisi non sono stati SOLO quei dati. Dati analoghi sono arrivati da più parti. https://t.co/NwqY3mdSFA https://t.co/vY22uFfTqE https://t.co/fQZCQZ5m48 https://t.co/OUevi3Hhwt https://t.co/aIq0KVQFXS https://t.co/bY2m1sZhrw https://t.co/SGIKkT5z1b https://t.co/TK4aFstJyv
again saline is not a worst case scenario using the adjuvant formulation is Safety and Efficacy of the BNT162b2 mRNA COVID-19 Vaccine New England Journal of Medicine, 2020 Randomized Trial of DTaP Vaccine Safety and Immunogenicity in Infants Pediatrics and Vaccine.
@MaricopaGOP @thereal_truther Yes, I am a leftist and a scientist and Elon et al. have shut down my functions here so I can’t even request to speak. Lots of science to discuss. https://t.co/CJ6VbIH6t4
@DorianWolffMD @Lesquisek @MahmoudZureik Ok, dites moi ou ai je tord. Voici l'étude : https://t.co/0rRYwqOQ6v N'hésitez pas a me dire combien vous comptez de décès en pleine épidémie dans chaque groupes. Si vous ne savez pas comptez, n'hésitez pas a m'en faire part rapidement
@ImmortelleXIII @es_gaia @_Laverdure_ @NiusMarco @franceinfo Tu répètes les éléments de langage de quel ahuri ? Voilà ton étude. Et voilà les conclusions. https://t.co/epoTWBODmz https://t.co/oHofeip1aq
興味深いPOST こちら伊賀 治氏の『Severe(重度)』見解をリンクさせて頂く https://t.co/e0DMs2yahx プロトコルへは個人でアクセス可能である為 google翻訳で自分でも確かめた N Eng J Med 2021;385:1761-1773 https://t.co/XztXpKaTbn 私的意見『Severe』は会社を半日以上休んだ かな? https://t.co/cFFVkzYpiy https://t.co/t7FRr49CpW
興味深いPOST 独自で解析されたようだが 論文図1を引用しgoogle翻訳をしてみた N Eng J Med 2021;385:1761-1773 https://t.co/XztXpKaTbn 偽薬群も謎の途中退場有り むしろ多いぐらいである https://t.co/9EGFKVp9v6 https://t.co/he1CUCUpbd
興味深いPOST 謎の引用? CDCルール以前に 治験結果を引用しているが 治験仕様はFDAでは? 引用論文は以下 N Eng J Med 2021;385:1761-1773 https://t.co/XztXpKaTbn Fig.2では接種1回目11日以内の有効性データは存在 https://t.co/H505WJtLYy https://t.co/cU2MzlG4lR
@TheMOWUSA @DocAhmadMalik https://t.co/ICkmcl3xlL
@GenBelisarius @DocAhmadMalik You'd think they'd proofread such an 'important' the document first
@les_vaxxeuses Tres juste. https://t.co/DmowRHiR5a ces posts ne sont destines qu'a ceux qui nous lisent, afin qu'ils vérifient que les vaccins sont toxiques et inefficaces. Votre position intenable ne s'explique que pour maquiller la politique vaccinale du GVT et cacher les méfaits des vaccins
@GangFighterKy2 何言ってるんですかね。私が挙げたデータはSupplementary AppendixのTable S3にあります。デマはやめてください。 https://t.co/lXalSGVYsS
RT @jisukewizon: @sugisakisoichi @Kuroi_Yahu @Eco_Ero_ZZ @P14691402 そこに記載されてる論文これなんだけど、安全かつ効果もあるってことなんだけど、あなた中身確認しましたか? https://t.co/i60s6X…
@sugisakisoichi @Kuroi_Yahu @Eco_Ero_ZZ @P14691402 そこに記載されてる論文これなんだけど、安全かつ効果もあるってことなんだけど、あなた中身確認しましたか? https://t.co/i60s6XyhAj
@_OvertonWindow_ @radiosilvana @depaolisdavid_ Con una semplice ricerca compaiono i trial Pfizer e Moderna di I-II e III fase, però se il cojone laureato in medicina su Google dice che NON SONO STATI FATTI, allora bisognerà crederci #ciglioni
@BrecourtManor @AlexBerenson Proven, BNT162b2 modified RNA vaccine. Vaccine efficacy against Covid-19 was 91.3% (95% confidence interval [CI], 89.0 to 93.2) through 6 months of follow-up among the participants without evidence of previous SARS-CoV-2 infection who could be evaluated. https://t.co/reYpwvHaJq
@AlexBerenson WRONG❗ BNT162b2 modified RNA vaccine. Vaccine efficacy against Covid-19 was 91.3% (95% confidence interval [CI], 89.0 to 93.2) through 6 months of follow-up among the participants without evidence of previous SARS-CoV-2 infection who could be evaluated. https://t.co/reYpwvHaJq
RT @iXeno: @Nockit1 @crabb_vicki @Scary7Dr @mcfunny @krebiozen @cappsie @gavleeham @dann58638436 @TheCrystalBrian @NewSeasonsSpa @ToBornin…
@Nockit1 @crabb_vicki @Scary7Dr @mcfunny @krebiozen @cappsie @gavleeham @dann58638436 @TheCrystalBrian @NewSeasonsSpa @ToBornin @Monstercoyliar @TMGFlorida @handmadekathy @ReneeBa41879905 @SkepticalMutant @FrankDElia7 @wjack76995 @TheFrankmanMN @Augusti03401363 @ianfmusgrave @TruthTwt @natedoromal @jayjoseph22 @rightwingblack2 @FUDyou2 @IainMulady @doritmi @JCDeardeuff @Izzitreally2 @Jccalmond2 @TweetOfSteiner @BlueLionBlog @thisisnothappen @Blackcatprowl3 @isa_picard @HawkInATX @VVDeingott @foofdawg @4thEchelon22 @TinFoilAwards @ktibus @F250Roush @Juanita87722370 @MsTrixter @Kathmarval @mrhawkes @BGLTHMND @ChrisJohnsonMD Nice Wordplay. This RCT assessed infection and safety. (“Transmission” depends on many other factors.) https://t.co/CJ6VbIH6t4 https://t.co/t6lGEDHkRM
@HopiNg66966500 https://t.co/CJ6VbIH6t4
@hardjappaleno 32 authors, most have no apparent conflict of interests. Even the Pfizer employee works in Safety and Risk Management. You think they and their 100 or so collaborators just faked the data? All just went along? https://t.co/CJ6VbIH6t4
@EyedRebecca @thevivafrei You sound anti Science. Because 2 months wasn’t the end of the RCT, here is the 6 month follow up data. No, parallel arms of a blinded trial don’t work like that. https://t.co/CJ6VbIH6t4
RT @vstefans: @Wammy517 @crabb_vicki @shallit43 @Awithonelison @axiomotime @krebiozen @Monstercoyliar @Lewislama @SkepticalMutant @ToBornin…
@Wammy517 @crabb_vicki @shallit43 @Awithonelison @axiomotime @krebiozen @Monstercoyliar @Lewislama @SkepticalMutant @ToBornin @NewSeasonsSpa @FUDyou2 @mcfunny @cappsie @Logical_007 @FrankDElia7 @ktibus @chezronify @gavleeham @dann58638436 @TheCrystalBrian @iXeno @TMGFlorida @handmadekathy @ReneeBa41879905 @wjack76995 @TheFrankmanMN @Augusti03401363 @ianfmusgrave @TruthTwt @natedoromal @jayjoseph22 @rightwingblack2 @IainMulady @doritmi @JCDeardeuff @Izzitreally2 @Jccalmond2 @TweetOfSteiner @BlueLionBlog @thisisnothappen @Blackcatprowl3 @isa_picard @HawkInATX @VVDeingott @foofdawg @4thEchelon22 @TinFoilAwards @F250Roush @Juanita87722370 These are actual citations in case anyone needs them. https://t.co/Q52Zacqj8u
@Lewislama @Monstercoyliar @SkepticalMutant @shallit43 @ToBornin @NewSeasonsSpa @krebiozen @FUDyou2 @mcfunny @cappsie @axiomotime @Logical_007 @FrankDElia7 @vstefans @ktibus @Awithonelison @chezronify @gavleeham @dann58638436 @crabb_vicki @TheCrystalBrian @TMGFlorida @handmadekathy @ReneeBa41879905 @wjack76995 @TheFrankmanMN @Augusti03401363 @ianfmusgrave @TruthTwt @natedoromal @jayjoseph22 @rightwingblack2 @IainMulady @doritmi @JCDeardeuff @Izzitreally2 @Jccalmond2 @TweetOfSteiner @BlueLionBlog @thisisnothappen @Blackcatprowl3 @isa_picard @HawkInATX @VVDeingott @foofdawg @4thEchelon22 @TinFoilAwards @F250Roush @Juanita87722370 Gosh like if only somebody had published the RCT data… and why didn’t they give us 6 month data on safety and efficacy? Oh they did…https://t.co/CJ6VbIH6t4
Ist ja auch erst seit > 31.12.2020 < bekannt. „Safety and Efficacy of the BNT162b2 mRNA Covid-19 Vaccine“
@unbekannt799 Hat da jemand die Zulassungsstudie vergessen? Und die Folgestudien? https://t.co/Myhd70PuT1 und https://t.co/gTQu3AFdrm Nur mal beispielhaft...
@horclas Randomized Controlled Trials. Anbei zur Lektüre : https://t.co/8ya68e2G8r https://t.co/FcqJQUDJvL
@bioethicsnow https://t.co/ov76TKdQuC https://t.co/bbW0gRcOJl
6ヶ月間のBNT162b2 mRNA Covid-19ワクチンの安全性と有効性-PubMed https://t.co/FAWLmEQfij
@covidacc @fseiichizb4 下記の2報、47) と50)ですね https://t.co/ddKKQxRQTI Fig.2 D 47)重症例/母数(人): 接種群 1/23040、非接種群 23/23037 [接種後7日以内] https://t.co/mhFbbQZLe5 50)重症例/母数(人): 接種群 0/1305、非接種群 0/663 [全例小児]
@DrJKunadhasan Do you mean that the number of deaths is wrong in the september 2021 publication ? That 30 deaths were hidden ?? https://t.co/kcMdTizQOS https://t.co/J9n0j7mY2P
#14 https://t.co/ytMi38oO2J
@sylv_lau @raoult_didier Je ne nie rien du tout. Je lis les articles scientifiques et les méta-analyses sur la sécurité des vaccins https://t.co/NJDUW4UKvU
@Marzenka120277 @michaallelkt @Margo66122891 https://t.co/cNW5Bqp8YW proszę.
@RussellScotland @ClareCraigPath It does not say: https://t.co/V662vKgf8x
@DesmondDrake12 @Benurse6 @eglem1 @Mag0min0gaM @TD8949 @DocAmine_ https://t.co/3bm3uA76Ny
@Bateman234 @Bille3Bille311 @JohannesNormann @SaschaUlbrich @bigdady2022 @Elchin14804939 @WottZefuck https://t.co/lqeYQoa7Rm
@STRAT777 @mcfunny @crabb_vicki @ToBornin @SkepticalMutant @kithercbaby @Archivist1000 @ChrisJohnsonMD @handmadekathy @Monstercoyliar @TheFrankmanMN @JCDeardeuff @Troonemotime @doritmi @FactsMatterGuy @IainMulady @TruthTwt @Izzitreally2 @Jccalmond2 @krebiozen @TweetOfSteiner @Augusti03401363 @ianfmusgrave @BlueLionBlog @thisisnothappen @natedoromal @FrankDElia7 @Blackcatprowl3 @isa_picard @HawkInATX @VVDeingott @foofdawg @4thEchelon22 @TinFoilAwards @ktibus @F250Roush @Juanita87722370 @MsTrixter @Kathmarval @mrhawkes @BGLTHMND @ThomasHarrigan8 @BigBruce1972 @keithccurtis @John010708 @lewbloch @somethinsomethi @cappsie @lizditz @LinhartBuzzy Perhaps you missed the 6 month study published in November 2021. They got the two month data (median time post vaccine) out in 2020, actually pretty impressive. https://t.co/CJ6VbIH6t4
@selfdev84 @nacigorur https://t.co/MWAH4ZaWRT https://t.co/P053hw5Zz2 https://t.co/cyhj1mk38Q bana bütün iddaalarınla ilgili linkleri gönderebilir misin?
@boulware_dr True. But Pfizer RCT 6 month results did not show a reduction in death with vax vs placebo. Observational studies are confounded; groups are not equivalent. https://t.co/CDaHGAAyJc
@RB84509962 @CaulfieldTim @factaotearoa @NBCNews https://t.co/vX1ny6TMpA
Anti-vaccination folk keep saying these trials were never run. Here’s a report on one of the trials. 1/n Safety and Efficacy of the BNT162b2 mRNA Covid-19 Vaccine through 6 Months - PubMed https://t.co/sI07hJSYhV
@topguncarguy @DineshDSouza Her’s a clinical trial of Pfizer’s vaccine more recently. Still working . https://t.co/sI07hJSYhV
@johnsgunn @JosibeanL @HeyNurseKat https://t.co/RAk87It4tP https://t.co/OQdELjzwsi Is is same study that provided EUA, looks like you did not read it, also graph is derived from table (also in image) preprints are later published after Peer.r. https://t.co/Oa191ZUbmj Feel free to interpret data, find obfuscation!
@MathieuMolimard @Sante_Gouv Rappel, il n'y a aucune efficacité démontrée sur la mortalité Covid, ni sur la mortalité dans l'essai clinique Pfizer source: https://t.co/5IySdyKUgR
RT @Fizz_DI: @HqRbYvho23wlEGO @sosotakei (続き) https://t.co/d5jQLupEyC https://t.co/Aooqp2oMTN https://t.co/3YFtjtjWpK https://t.co/eBJagxel…
@HqRbYvho23wlEGO @sosotakei (続き) https://t.co/d5jQLupEyC https://t.co/Aooqp2oMTN https://t.co/3YFtjtjWpK https://t.co/eBJagxelxm https://t.co/3YFtjtjWpK https://t.co/pNeA27uH8a https://t.co/7vAMXR29aF https://t.co/8u5YPclARq https://t.co/a1gyYmXVMs
@pierrerosellini Rappel, il n'y a aucune efficacité démontrée sur la mortalité Covid, ni sur la mortalité dans l'essai clinique Pfizer source: https://t.co/5IySdyKmrj
RT @BERNARDLUCIEN3: @ordre_medecins @HAS_sante Rappel, il n'y a aucune efficacité démontrée sur la mortalité Covid, ni sur la mortalité dan…
@ordre_medecins @HAS_sante Rappel, il n'y a aucune efficacité démontrée sur la mortalité Covid, ni sur la mortalité dans l'essai clinique Pfizer source: https://t.co/5IySdyKmrj
@cheeky_disco @BerryTartlet @TheBHF Like this one? Unfortunately, this supports quite the opposite of safe and effective. https://t.co/rxejGS5F7T
RT @StatChrisCotton: Rappel, il n'y a aucune efficacité démontrée sur la mortalité Covid, ni sur la mortalité dans l'essai clinique Pfizer…
RT @Cyrille68695905:
@CloudPristine @Monstercoyliar @NewSeasonsSpa @handmadekathy @FrankDElia7 @TruthTwt @iXeno @cappsie @jayjoseph22 @crabb_vicki @rightwingblack2 @FUDyou2 @SkepticalMutant @IainMulady @doritmi @JCDeardeuff @Izzitreally2 @Jccalmond2 @krebiozen @TweetOfSteiner @Augusti03401363 @ianfmusgrave @BlueLionBlog @thisisnothappen @natedoromal @TheFrankmanMN @Blackcatprowl3 @isa_picard @HawkInATX @VVDeingott @foofdawg @4thEchelon22 @TinFoilAwards @ktibus @F250Roush @Juanita87722370 @MsTrixter @Kathmarval @mrhawkes @BGLTHMND @ChrisJohnsonMD @ThomasHarrigan8 @BigBruce1972 @keithccurtis @John010708 @lewbloch @somethinsomethi @lizditz published..... https://t.co/ILLSJFSir2
RT @MIGUELA71643080: Sin efectos probados sobre la mortalidad en el ensayo clínico de Pfizer. fuente Ver anexos https://t.co/KGni4zBah5 htt…
Sin efectos probados sobre la mortalidad en el ensayo clínico de Pfizer. fuente Ver anexos https://t.co/KGni4zBah5 https://t.co/I41Y4jhAp0
RT @BERNARDLUCIEN3: @DocAmine_ je comprends que les études scientifiques ce n'est pas pour toi. tu viens a peine de rentrer dans le marché…
@Mavivance @CaudeHenrion En voici 1% https://t.co/aIKqryA8yz https://t.co/VZSQX6BBEv https://t.co/I9gq4eLNFW https://t.co/nmErX24AU3 https://t.co/5WfFeoqxYL https://t.co/RwJvC5uSzW https://t.co/smIf3bgHyg https://t.co/3osYE2wGe9 https://t.co/wsBXxXph9G https://t.co/37phwcdf1T
RT @BERNARDLUCIEN3: @DocAmine_ je comprends que les études scientifiques ce n'est pas pour toi. tu viens a peine de rentrer dans le marché…
RT @BERNARDLUCIEN3: @DocAmine_ je comprends que les études scientifiques ce n'est pas pour toi. tu viens a peine de rentrer dans le marché…
RT @BERNARDLUCIEN3: @DocAmine_ je comprends que les études scientifiques ce n'est pas pour toi. tu viens a peine de rentrer dans le marché…
RT @BERNARDLUCIEN3: @DocAmine_ je comprends que les études scientifiques ce n'est pas pour toi. tu viens a peine de rentrer dans le marché…
@DocAmine_ je comprends que les études scientifiques ce n'est pas pour toi. tu viens a peine de rentrer dans le marché du travail
RT @StatChrisCotton: Rappel, il n'y a aucune efficacité démontrée sur la mortalité Covid, ni sur la mortalité dans l'essai clinique Pfizer…
@BFMTV Rappel, il n'y a aucune efficacité démontrée sur la mortalité Covid, ni sur la mortalité dans l'essai clinique Pfizer source: https://t.co/5IySdyKUgR
@acadmed @APHP @Sante_Gouv @FrcsBraun @AssembleeNat @Senat @afpfr @APMinfos https://t.co/5IySdyKUgR
RT @StatChrisCotton: Rappel, il n'y a aucune efficacité démontrée sur la mortalité Covid, ni sur la mortalité dans l'essai clinique Pfizer…
RT @StatChrisCotton: Rappel, il n'y a aucune efficacité démontrée sur la mortalité Covid, ni sur la mortalité dans l'essai clinique Pfizer…
@CarolineYADAN @FiAssemblee Que des Néant en Macronie
RT @StatChrisCotton: Rappel, il n'y a aucune efficacité démontrée sur la mortalité Covid, ni sur la mortalité dans l'essai clinique Pfizer…
RT @StatChrisCotton: Rappel, il n'y a aucune efficacité démontrée sur la mortalité Covid, ni sur la mortalité dans l'essai clinique Pfizer…
RT @StatChrisCotton: Rappel, il n'y a aucune efficacité démontrée sur la mortalité Covid, ni sur la mortalité dans l'essai clinique Pfizer…
RT @StatChrisCotton: Rappel, il n'y a aucune efficacité démontrée sur la mortalité Covid, ni sur la mortalité dans l'essai clinique Pfizer…
RT @StatChrisCotton: Rappel, il n'y a aucune efficacité démontrée sur la mortalité Covid, ni sur la mortalité dans l'essai clinique Pfizer…
RT @StatChrisCotton: Rappel, il n'y a aucune efficacité démontrée sur la mortalité Covid, ni sur la mortalité dans l'essai clinique Pfizer…
RT @StatChrisCotton: Rappel, il n'y a aucune efficacité démontrée sur la mortalité Covid, ni sur la mortalité dans l'essai clinique Pfizer…
RT @StatChrisCotton: Rappel, il n'y a aucune efficacité démontrée sur la mortalité Covid, ni sur la mortalité dans l'essai clinique Pfizer…
RT @StatChrisCotton: Rappel, il n'y a aucune efficacité démontrée sur la mortalité Covid, ni sur la mortalité dans l'essai clinique Pfizer…
RT @StatChrisCotton: Rappel, il n'y a aucune efficacité démontrée sur la mortalité Covid, ni sur la mortalité dans l'essai clinique Pfizer…
RT @StatChrisCotton: Rappel, il n'y a aucune efficacité démontrée sur la mortalité Covid, ni sur la mortalité dans l'essai clinique Pfizer…
RT @StatChrisCotton: Rappel, il n'y a aucune efficacité démontrée sur la mortalité Covid, ni sur la mortalité dans l'essai clinique Pfizer…
RT @StatChrisCotton: Rappel, il n'y a aucune efficacité démontrée sur la mortalité Covid, ni sur la mortalité dans l'essai clinique Pfizer…
RT @StatChrisCotton: Rappel, il n'y a aucune efficacité démontrée sur la mortalité Covid, ni sur la mortalité dans l'essai clinique Pfizer…
RT @StatChrisCotton: Rappel, il n'y a aucune efficacité démontrée sur la mortalité Covid, ni sur la mortalité dans l'essai clinique Pfizer…
RT @StatChrisCotton: Rappel, il n'y a aucune efficacité démontrée sur la mortalité Covid, ni sur la mortalité dans l'essai clinique Pfizer…
RT @StatChrisCotton: Rappel, il n'y a aucune efficacité démontrée sur la mortalité Covid, ni sur la mortalité dans l'essai clinique Pfizer…
RT @StatChrisCotton: Rappel, il n'y a aucune efficacité démontrée sur la mortalité Covid, ni sur la mortalité dans l'essai clinique Pfizer…
RT @StatChrisCotton: Rappel, il n'y a aucune efficacité démontrée sur la mortalité Covid, ni sur la mortalité dans l'essai clinique Pfizer…
RT @StatChrisCotton: Rappel, il n'y a aucune efficacité démontrée sur la mortalité Covid, ni sur la mortalité dans l'essai clinique Pfizer…
RT @StatChrisCotton: Rappel, il n'y a aucune efficacité démontrée sur la mortalité Covid, ni sur la mortalité dans l'essai clinique Pfizer…
RT @StatChrisCotton: Rappel, il n'y a aucune efficacité démontrée sur la mortalité Covid, ni sur la mortalité dans l'essai clinique Pfizer…
RT @StatChrisCotton: Rappel, il n'y a aucune efficacité démontrée sur la mortalité Covid, ni sur la mortalité dans l'essai clinique Pfizer…
RT @StatChrisCotton: Rappel, il n'y a aucune efficacité démontrée sur la mortalité Covid, ni sur la mortalité dans l'essai clinique Pfizer…
@anvaccar @pbecchi C'è anche la statistica della pfizer https://t.co/MO9ihl7mdV https://t.co/MBKWD2XhHJ
@JasonKowalyshyn @provaxtexan @JonathanHannah @TonyBaduy @volpiranyas @pompili_amanda @doom37455413 @KStateTurk @ogilville1 @JimeeLiberty @sammy44231 @richykirsh @MaureenStroud @andylumm @pawley_robert @Monstercoyliar @tomsirolimus @zeetubes @SallyJiggles @LizNYC13 @AndrewLazarus4 @mcfunny @IdunsDaughter @butterednoodIe @MatthewNewell67 @NoMisinfoToday @KayVonPaul @bartm @Alex_on_A14 @PLHartungRN @handyman_neil @SkepticalMutant @ConsequentialBr @raouldukeerik @Nockit1 @ScepticalAussie @DbootyNabber @kath2cats @jtmayes3 @doritmi @mhunt081266 @ninawowp @MarkTho29550016 @xfirgaming @lewbloch @tatsandfats @3dogrunner @MagnoliaHoney2 @CHSdoctor @chimera414 Yes, the success of the vaccines were being published a year ago and since https://t.co/3ADb6FrQ2G https://t.co/HaUbOYYD8t https://t.co/cVIJ01fcAD https://t.co/yXaNlrOF2L https://t.co/9dujZV6vDf Now we have US, UK, Danish, Finnish, Israeli,
@TechARP @mcfunny @iambackagain21 @kath2cats @sammy44231 @ogilville1 @andylumm @JimeeLiberty @bibbydebob @JonathanHannah @PLHartungRN @jallen1315 @45Kerri @BtotheC67 @provaxtexan @volpiranyas @zeetubes @doom37455413 @SkepticalMutant @raouldukeerik @doritmi @J_EmpyreanGoals @skepticalprune @TonyBaduy @AndrewLazarus4 @GotAntibods @IdunsDaughter @AbsoluteGnosis @MatthewNewell67 @tomsirolimus @paco7320 @MeddlinMegs @RedSoxMVP @hubie_greiner @prog_r0k @DatGnarlyOldGuy @richykirsh @SergioVengeance @JRJHealey @_DrCJM_ @Awithonelison @sailor_man_dan @Monstercoyliar @tenebra99 @swedishchf @VENGYNCE @MsTrixter @immunotoxPhD @pfizer Just take a breath and read the medical science Hause et al 2022 https://t.co/an8AuD0AQk Klein et al 2022 https://t.co/gaatkSbVw0 Rosbenblum et al 2022 https://t.co/jj2ZAhqCuo Thomas et al 2021 https://t.co/HaUbOYYD8t
https://t.co/m7zUGFcCBt https://t.co/NAG3dtv8z5 https://t.co/alfd2CJ4qc https://t.co/WF1yecDHZA https://t.co/oAJRTXo7Ji https://t.co/48eBntKeTT https://t.co/48eBntKeTT https://t.co/F8bf5PJqZU https://t.co/F8bf5PJqZU https://t.co/10ULKZscDf (Segue)
@butterednoodIe @TonyBaduy @MatthewNewell67 @IdunsDaughter @NoMisinfoToday @JonathanHannah @KayVonPaul @bartm @SallyJiggles @Alex_on_A14 @PLHartungRN @AndrewLazarus4 @ogilville1 @pawley_robert @handyman_neil @volpiranyas @SkepticalMutant @JimeeLiberty @ConsequentialBr @sammy44231 @zeetubes @raouldukeerik @Nockit1 @provaxtexan @ScepticalAussie @Monstercoyliar @tomsirolimus @DbootyNabber @doom37455413 @richykirsh @kath2cats @jtmayes3 @doritmi @mhunt081266 @ninawowp @mcfunny @MarkTho29550016 @xfirgaming @lewbloch @tatsandfats @andylumm @3dogrunner @MagnoliaHoney2 @CHSdoctor @chimera414 @skepticalprune @LandonNTooke @instagram @pfizer @BioNTech_Group FDA rules Pfizer papers pre-clinical rhesus macaques https://t.co/QWEVtjQmg9 phase 1 Germany https://t.co/cXGEs0bWeV phase 1 US https://t.co/F3iRtSASST phase 3 https://t.co/3ADb6FrQ2G 6 months https://t.co/HaUbOYYD8t adolescents https://t.co/cVI
@beyzadelevent @Toprak60407169 @drugurmete 1. Khoury, D. S. et al. Nature Med. 27, 1205–1211 (2021). 2. Naaber, P. et al. Lancet Reg. Health Eur. https://t.co/HKNTTwwXdB (2021). 3. Thomas, S. J. et al. N. Engl. J. Med. https://t.co/mRmit4G0W4 (2021). 4. Pegu, A. et al. Science 373, 1372–1377 (2021).
@BallouxFrancois I don't know about the "fast" part. Against the original strain/Alpha the decline was obviously a lot slower than it is now Pfizers phase 3 trial had the efficacy at 84% at 4-6 months, https://t.co/G0yc5hJy2E The effect against onward transmissions was likely quite high then to
@Wontevertweet27 @Roman_Baber @RickNichollsCKL @randyhillier @LeslynLewis xjszVOfG_wo
@NM03539348 @RegionHannover @SteffenKrach @hauschke @EricTopol Wo hast Du denn diesen Blödzinn her? Kinder unter 12 waren gar nicht beteiligt. https://t.co/ABNTPpa1yg https://t.co/K2rz67HujH
https://t.co/alfd2CJ4qc
https://t.co/iwrLSC9SiH
https://t.co/IoFFyMiqiD
#論文紹介 ワクチンの有効性、安全性を2か月まで見ていましたが、半年のデータをNEJMの論文で発表されました ✅有効性は95%から91%と若干下がっている ✅ワクチンを接種しても重症化した人が出たようですが、重症化予防の有効性は97%とかなり高い https://t.co/weEHlB3LWT https://t.co/kva7zRl9tq
Safety and Efficacy of the BNT162b2 mRNA Covid-19 Vaccine | NEJM
O
CM
D
P
N
F
RS
R
MR
L
M
金宗
PV
MV
P
X
J
LM
TT
FS
DN
T
TB
JR
SM
M
S
TK
CS
A
SS
MM