Angiotensin Receptor-Neprilysin Inhibition in Acute Myocardial Infarction.
Mentions
Extended reach
Total likes
Video views
Mentions per month
Nov 2021 – Apr 2025Where it's discussed
-
X / Twitter177 posts
-
News12 articles
-
Facebook5 posts
-
Blogs5 articles
-
YouTube2 videos
AI synopsis
What people are saying
Discussions prominently highlight the failure of sacubitril-valsartan to demonstrate benefits over ramipril for patients with acute myocardial infarction and reduced ejection fraction, with phrases like 'no significant benefit' and references to the trial's negative outcomes. This choice of language conveys a critical tone towards the effectiveness of ARNI therapy in this particular context, suggesting a consensus on the need to reconsider treatment strategies.
Many discussions reflect skepticism regarding the benefits of ARNI therapy versus ramipril, indicating a level of disagreement with the findings.
There is a high level of curiosity about the implications of the trial results, with many participants engaging actively in discussions about its relevance.
While the depth of engagement varies, several posts reference specific data and findings from the study, indicating a moderate level of analysis.
Overall, users perceive a significant impact from the study on clinical practices, especially concerning post-myocardial infarction treatments.
Abstract in brief
- Sacubitril-valsartan shows promise in heart failure by reducing cardiovascular death and hospitalization compared to the traditional ramipril treatment.
- In a study involving 5,661 patients with myocardial infarction and reduced heart function, outcomes favored sacubitril-valsartan in terms of hospitalizations related to heart failure.
- Although both drugs had similar rates of treatment discontinuation due to side effects, sacubitril-valsartan did not significantly lead to lower overall adverse outcomes compared to ramipril.
Top posts
Most liked on X and BlueskyPARADISE-MI failed to show significant benefit of ARNI therapy as compared to ramipril in patients acutely post-MI with EF < 40%. Why do you think ARNI therapy failed to show benefit in this population? https://t.co/aBr7fGxw0o #WhatsNewWednesday @NEJM https://t.co/QZ4DRQXSvv
#PARADISE-MI in @NEJM
Angiotensin Receptor–Neprilysin Inhibition in Acute Myocardial Infarction | NEJM https://t.co/d29jt5gVlF PARADISE-MI ➡️SAC–VAL was not associated w/ a significantly⤵️ incidence of death from CV causes or incident HF than ramipril among
✍️Artículos originales:
A. Can't say these negative results are a surprise. B. Can someone remind my why the control group in these studies is never equal dose ARB? Angiotensin Receptor–Neprilysin Inhibition in Acute Myocardial Infarction | NEJM https://t.co/1MUjOMz9bn
All mentions
GLP1 Agonists and Heart Failure Insights for Healthcare Professionals
This week, John Mandrola MD discusses suicidal ideation associated with GLP1 agonists, focusing on the implications for healthcare professionals. He also revisits the PARADIGM HF study and explores insights from recent…
Advancements in Heart Failure Treatment: Sacubitril-Valsartan Insights
The safety of very low LDLC, sacubitril-valsartan's promise in heart failure, and the impact of SGLT2 inhibitors are discussed in this podcast. It analyzes recent findings on treatment outcomes, including…
@FadyMFouad https://t.co/f6xvtEL3YH
@CardioBornan @siacprevent @jpcostabel @clara_clarais @rigotordoc @DrPontecarlosi @MediCasos @MedicinaSAM @ceciliabahit @SABOURETCardio @drmiguelmarcos El PARADISE MI no demostró beneficio en pacientes post IAM con insuficiencia cardíaca o FEY ⬇️ A diferencia de ensayos con IECA/ARA2, en este estudio, >90% de los pacientes fueron revascularizados https://t.co/6AUXKnoqF3
@PharmacistHF https://t.co/ckQ78UohJF https://t.co/GOeIxpDuhG https://t.co/cXcMFJOrca
RT @nebetake: @KagiyamaNobu あと最近の心不全治療薬のMI + LVEF低下へのエビデンスだとARNIのPARADISE-MIも大事ですね。一緒に合わせて確認すると理解が深まるかもしれません。 ARNIはACEI(ラミプリル)と比較しprimary e…
@KagiyamaNobu あと最近の心不全治療薬のMI + LVEF低下へのエビデンスだとARNIのPARADISE-MIも大事ですね。一緒に合わせて確認すると理解が深まるかもしれません。 ARNIはACEI(ラミプリル)と比較しprimary eventを改善しない。傾向はありますが... https://t.co/bDh2n7I7Os
そして、心不全既往の無い心筋梗塞発症例(LVEF<40% もしくは肺うっ血を伴う等の諸条件あり)に対しては、ACEIとイベント発生率に差は無い。 PARADISE-MI https://t.co/zJm1xRsV2E
このあと読む:Angiotensin Receptor–Neprilysin Inhibition in Acute Myocardial Infarction https://t.co/i06LRMkmlL
RT @javier20ch: ✍️Artículos originales:
RT @javier20ch: ✍️Artículos originales:
RT @FarmaMadridAP: (NEJM)
@JJCuthbert @cardiacshah @Chillslincoln79 @psquireslincoln @ChelsyCliff @ElifEzgiUstun @TinLwin9 @OllyBrown @clhyland_hewitt Just because something works in chronic HFrEF doesn't mean it will be beneficial for post-MI LVSD. https://t.co/xTDkXfnGyS
RT @javier20ch: ✍️Artículos originales:
RT @javier20ch: ✍️Artículos originales:
RT @javier20ch: ✍️Artículos originales:
RT @javier20ch: ✍️Artículos originales:
RT @javier20ch: ✍️Artículos originales:
RT @javier20ch: ✍️Artículos originales:
RT @javier20ch: ✍️Artículos originales:
RT @javier20ch: ✍️Artículos originales:
RT @javier20ch: ✍️Artículos originales:
✍️Artículos originales:
@Dr_Agibus Attention pour 2/ l’essai princeps est négatif ! https://t.co/uBoC2ABSJP
@kamran_hayaan @usamaisawake @willyhfrick Unless they had an mi as the cause of their heart failure. https://t.co/wv7ekiTbSQ
MIでEF低下or 肺うっ血にARNIは予後を改善しない結果だったけど、虚血解除後EF戻った例がどれほどあったかや、リスク低下は予想より少なかったのでパワー不足だった可能性など疑問はある。Angiotensin Receptor–Neprilysin Inhibition in Acute Myocardial Infarction | NEJM https://t.co/5PNltbO9XV
Angiotensin Receptor-Neprilysin Inhibition in Acute Myocardial Infarction https://t.co/pF1R3psDlm
RT @Farmacia_HUGU:
RT @Farmacia_HUGU:
RT @Farmacia_HUGU:
#080 Angiotensin Receptor–Neprilysin Inhibition in Acute Myocardial Infarction N Engl J Med 2021;385:1845-55. PARADISE-MI試験 サクビトリル-バルサルタンは、ラミプリルと比較して、急性心筋梗塞後の心血管死などの複合エンドポイントを改善させることはなかった
RT @accpcardprn: PARADISE-MI failed to show significant benefit of ARNI therapy as compared to ramipril in patients acutely post-MI with EF…
RT @accpcardprn: PARADISE-MI failed to show significant benefit of ARNI therapy as compared to ramipril in patients acutely post-MI with EF…
RT @accpcardprn: PARADISE-MI failed to show significant benefit of ARNI therapy as compared to ramipril in patients acutely post-MI with EF…
RT @accpcardprn: PARADISE-MI failed to show significant benefit of ARNI therapy as compared to ramipril in patients acutely post-MI with EF…
RT @accpcardprn: PARADISE-MI failed to show significant benefit of ARNI therapy as compared to ramipril in patients acutely post-MI with EF…
RT @accpcardprn: PARADISE-MI failed to show significant benefit of ARNI therapy as compared to ramipril in patients acutely post-MI with EF…
RT @accpcardprn: PARADISE-MI failed to show significant benefit of ARNI therapy as compared to ramipril in patients acutely post-MI with EF…
RT @accpcardprn: PARADISE-MI failed to show significant benefit of ARNI therapy as compared to ramipril in patients acutely post-MI with EF…
PARADISE-MI failed to show significant benefit of ARNI therapy as compared to ramipril in patients acutely post-MI with EF < 40%. Why do you think ARNI therapy failed to show benefit in this population? https://t.co/aBr7fGxw0o #WhatsNewWednesday @NEJM https://t.co/QZ4DRQXSvv
16) PARADISE-MI demonstrated no significant benefit of #ARNI over #ACEi in patients with acute #MI with reduced LVEF and/or pulmonary congestion (https://t.co/XtZJ5pBREd). Thus, evidence to date does not support using ARNI over ACEi to reduce CV death or incident HF in acute MI. https://t.co/dw6hzm8X52
ピックアップ論文 -臨床- (担当:西宮健介 病院助教) Angiotensin Receptor-Neprilysin Inhibition in Acute Myocardial Infarction. NEJM 2021;385:1845-55. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2104508
Angiotensin Receptor-Neprilysin Inhibition in Acute Myocardial Infarction https://t.co/pF1R3pbAjm
RT @RevistaMFSamfyc: Inhibición de neprilisina-receptor de angiotensina en el infarto agudo de miocardio https://t.co/WbGLKgcIWM PMID 34758…
Angiotensin Receptor-Neprilysin Inhibition in Acute Myocardial Infarction https://t.co/ZeTVWN53FB
RT @SOCCA_CritCare: ARNI, use beyond symptomatic heart failure? https://t.co/dvaXQfIsiL https://t.co/Fq4HUkUMlQ
Angiotensin Receptor–Neprilysin Inhibition in Acute Myocardial Infarction | NEJM https://t.co/H2Ffcd5zal
ARNI, use beyond symptomatic heart failure? https://t.co/dvaXQfIsiL https://t.co/Fq4HUkUMlQ
Inhibición de neprilisina-receptor de angiotensina en el infarto agudo de miocardio https://t.co/WbGLKgcIWM PMID 34758252
Tiempo de estudio 22 meses. https://t.co/MEwTPMFR4o
RT @JohnHRandall1: Angiotensin Receptor–Neprilysin Inhibition in Acute Myocardial Infarction | NEJM https://t.co/aH3g67fmOo
Angiotensin Receptor–Neprilysin Inhibition in Acute Myocardial Infarction | NEJM https://t.co/aH3g67fmOo
『急性心筋梗塞におけるアンジオテンシン受容体-ネプリライシン阻害作用について』https://t.co/JtPsp2blcN https://t.co/6s3zMHvxGT
「CV死亡・HF”入院”」も0.91 [0.78-1.07]。 https://t.co/QsmS2LIUh7 Nov.11
So - Entresto works great for Heart Failure, but for heart attacks it's no better than ACEIs. Angiotensin Receptor-Neprilysin Inhibition in Acute Myocardial Infarction | comment: Douglas L Mann MD https://t.co/wDliCuqDg3 via @practiceupdate
@CardioIAN #CardioTwitter https://t.co/JHky9DrJrG
Angiotensin Receptor-Neprilysin Inhibition in Acute Myocardial Infarction https://t.co/TVJmuI77zm #cardiology
Angiotensin Receptor–Neprilysin Inhibition in Acute Myocardial Infarction https://t.co/C8CX36HADw
RT @rincondesisifo: (NEJM) Sacubitrilo-valsartán NO superior a ramipril en pac post IAM y FE reducida https://t.co/RV0sVQHY96 ECA #PARADISE…
RT @rincondesisifo: (NEJM) Sacubitrilo-valsartán NO superior a ramipril en pac post IAM y FE reducida https://t.co/RV0sVQHY96 ECA #PARADISE…
RT @FarmaMadridAP: (NEJM)
RT @medichulston: Entresto is not effective when given in the days following an MI in patients with LV impairment. Let the heart heal, then…
RT @rincondesisifo: (NEJM) Sacubitrilo-valsartán NO superior a ramipril en pac post IAM y FE reducida https://t.co/RV0sVQHY96 ECA #PARADISE…
RT @rincondesisifo: (NEJM) Sacubitrilo-valsartán NO superior a ramipril en pac post IAM y FE reducida https://t.co/RV0sVQHY96 ECA #PARADISE…
RT @FarmaMadridAP: (NEJM)
RT @rincondesisifo: (NEJM) Sacubitrilo-valsartán NO superior a ramipril en pac post IAM y FE reducida https://t.co/RV0sVQHY96 ECA #PARADISE…
RT @rincondesisifo: (NEJM) Sacubitrilo-valsartán NO superior a ramipril en pac post IAM y FE reducida https://t.co/RV0sVQHY96 ECA #PARADISE…
Estimado @Felipediezhoyo me gustaría saber tu valiosa opinión de esto... https://t.co/o9rG6zmwKH
RT @FarmaMadridAP: (NEJM)
RT @rincondesisifo: (NEJM) Sacubitrilo-valsartán NO superior a ramipril en pac post IAM y FE reducida https://t.co/RV0sVQHY96 ECA #PARADISE…
RT @FarmaMadridAP: (NEJM)
RT @FarmaMadridAP: (NEJM)
RT @rincondesisifo: (NEJM) Sacubitrilo-valsartán NO superior a ramipril en pac post IAM y FE reducida https://t.co/RV0sVQHY96 ECA #PARADISE…
RT @NEJM: This randomized, double-blind, active-controlled trial compared sacubitril–valsartan with ramipril in patients who had acute myoc…
RT @FarmaMadridAP: (NEJM)
RT @FarmaMadridAP: (NEJM)
Entresto is not effective when given in the days following an MI in patients with LV impairment. Let the heart heal, then re-assess the LV. https://t.co/GTSI1OqQJw
RT @FarmaMadridAP: (NEJM)
RT @FarmaMadridAP: (NEJM)
RT @NEJM: This randomized, double-blind, active-controlled trial compared sacubitril–valsartan with ramipril in patients who had acute myoc…
RT @FarmaMadridAP: (NEJM)
RT @NEJM: This randomized, double-blind, active-controlled trial compared sacubitril–valsartan with ramipril in patients who had acute myoc…
RT @rincondesisifo: (NEJM) Sacubitrilo-valsartán NO superior a ramipril en pac post IAM y FE reducida https://t.co/RV0sVQHY96 ECA #PARADISE…
RT @rincondesisifo: (NEJM) Sacubitrilo-valsartán NO superior a ramipril en pac post IAM y FE reducida https://t.co/RV0sVQHY96 ECA #PARADISE…
RT @rincondesisifo: (NEJM) Sacubitrilo-valsartán NO superior a ramipril en pac post IAM y FE reducida https://t.co/RV0sVQHY96 ECA #PARADISE…
RT @FarmaMadridAP: (NEJM)
RT @NEJM: This randomized, double-blind, active-controlled trial compared sacubitril–valsartan with ramipril in patients who had acute myoc…
RT @FarmaMadridAP: (NEJM)
RT @rincondesisifo: (NEJM) Sacubitrilo-valsartán NO superior a ramipril en pac post IAM y FE reducida https://t.co/RV0sVQHY96 ECA #PARADISE…
Angiotensin Receptor–Neprilysin Inhibition in Acute Myocardial Infarction | NEJM https://t.co/IcxMUx9jaV
RT @rincondesisifo: (NEJM) Sacubitrilo-valsartán NO superior a ramipril en pac post IAM y FE reducida https://t.co/RV0sVQHY96 ECA #PARADISE…
RT @rincondesisifo: (NEJM) Sacubitrilo-valsartán NO superior a ramipril en pac post IAM y FE reducida https://t.co/RV0sVQHY96 ECA #PARADISE…
RT @NEJM: This randomized, double-blind, active-controlled trial compared sacubitril–valsartan with ramipril in patients who had acute myoc…
RT @RyanWereski:
RT @rincondesisifo: (NEJM) Sacubitrilo-valsartán NO superior a ramipril en pac post IAM y FE reducida https://t.co/RV0sVQHY96 ECA #PARADISE…
RT @FarmaMadridAP: (NEJM)
RT @FarmaMadridAP: (NEJM)
RT @NEJM: This randomized, double-blind, active-controlled trial compared sacubitril–valsartan with ramipril in patients who had acute myoc…
RT @NEJM: This randomized, double-blind, active-controlled trial compared sacubitril–valsartan with ramipril in patients who had acute myoc…
RT @FarmaMadridAP: (NEJM)
RT @NEJM: This randomized, double-blind, active-controlled trial compared sacubitril–valsartan with ramipril in patients who had acute myoc…
ARNI is not better than ramipril when started after acute MI https://t.co/BU5bLT2j7q
RT @NEJM: This randomized, double-blind, active-controlled trial compared sacubitril–valsartan with ramipril in patients who had acute myoc…
RT @NEJM: This randomized, double-blind, active-controlled trial compared sacubitril–valsartan with ramipril in patients who had acute myoc…
RT @FarmaMadridAP: (NEJM)
Angiotensin Receptor-Neprilysin Inhibition in Acute Myocardial Infarction https://t.co/o57Warnhpb
Angiotensin Receptor–Neprilysin Inhibition in Acute Myocardial Infarction | NEJM https://t.co/1ofirCpqYY
RT @nitrotake: 急性心筋梗塞に対してサクビトリルバルサルタンはラミプリルと比較して、複合アウトカムの差はなかった。 11.9%vs13.2% HR:0.90(0.78-1.04)P=0.17 https://t.co/8nwhnZrf1R
急性心筋梗塞に対してサクビトリルバルサルタンはラミプリルと比較して、複合アウトカムの差はなかった。 11.9%vs13.2% HR:0.90(0.78-1.04)P=0.17 https://t.co/8nwhnZrf1R
Angiotensin Receptor–Neprilysin Inhibition in Acute Myocardial Infarction | NEJM https://t.co/7iEaxuIZFp
【RCT】LVEF低下、肺鬱血またはその両方を合併する心筋梗塞患者へのサクビトリル-バルサルタンの投与は、ラミプリルの投与と比較して、心血管死亡や心不全の発生を減少させなかった。 #ペ読 https://t.co/1PwpA6lNsE
RT @SeguraCardio:
RT @vic_pallares: Angiotensin Receptor–Neprilysin Inhibition in Acute Myocardial Infarction | NEJM https://t.co/d29jt5gVlF PARADISE-MI ➡️S…
RT @vic_pallares: Angiotensin Receptor–Neprilysin Inhibition in Acute Myocardial Infarction | NEJM https://t.co/d29jt5gVlF PARADISE-MI ➡️S…
RT @SeguraCardio:
RT @vic_pallares: Angiotensin Receptor–Neprilysin Inhibition in Acute Myocardial Infarction | NEJM https://t.co/d29jt5gVlF PARADISE-MI ➡️S…
RT @SeguraCardio:
RT @vic_pallares: Angiotensin Receptor–Neprilysin Inhibition in Acute Myocardial Infarction | NEJM https://t.co/d29jt5gVlF PARADISE-MI ➡️S…
Angiotensin Receptor–Neprilysin Inhibition in Acute Myocardial Infarction: PARADISE - MI Trial. https://t.co/IkOIrqjqRS
RT @SeguraCardio:
RT @SeguraCardio:
RT @ALEX_MISCHIE: Angiotensin Receptor–Neprilysin Inhibition in Acute Myocardial Infarction https://t.co/BOgmpeUjOA https://t.co/0Q5xSDd8ES
RT @SeguraCardio:
Trend up+15: Pfeffer MA, ..., Paradise-mi Investigators and Committees (N Engl J Med) __Angiotensin Receptor-Neprilysin Inhibition in Acute Myocardial Infarction__ https://t.co/H9AULhEg7e
RT @vic_pallares: Angiotensin Receptor–Neprilysin Inhibition in Acute Myocardial Infarction | NEJM https://t.co/d29jt5gVlF PARADISE-MI ➡️S…
RT @SeguraCardio:
RT @SeguraCardio:
RT @SeguraCardio:
RT @SeguraCardio:
RT @SeguraCardio:
RT @ValleAlfonso: #PARADISE-MI in @NEJM
RT @adamcifu: A. Can't say these negative results are a surprise. B. Can someone remind my why the control group in these studies is never…
RT @SeguraCardio:
RT @SeguraCardio:
RT @ValleAlfonso: #PARADISE-MI in @NEJM
RT @SeguraCardio:
RT @SeguraCardio:
RT @adamcifu: A. Can't say these negative results are a surprise. B. Can someone remind my why the control group in these studies is never…
RT @SeguraCardio:
RT @vic_pallares: Angiotensin Receptor–Neprilysin Inhibition in Acute Myocardial Infarction | NEJM https://t.co/d29jt5gVlF PARADISE-MI ➡️S…
Sin beneficio adicional en comparación con Ramipril. Si tuviste un infarto, que no te falte el IECA. Angiotensin Receptor–Neprilysin Inhibition in Acute Myocardial Infarction | NEJM https://t.co/INnHuKQbvF
RT @vic_pallares: Angiotensin Receptor–Neprilysin Inhibition in Acute Myocardial Infarction | NEJM https://t.co/d29jt5gVlF PARADISE-MI ➡️S…
RT @acorderofort: Angiotensin Receptor–Neprilysin Inhibition in Acute Myocardial Infarction @NEJM https://t.co/Je312mJpMf
Angiotensin Receptor–Neprilysin Inhibition in Acute Myocardial Infarction https://t.co/BOgmpeUjOA https://t.co/0Q5xSDd8ES
RT @adamcifu: A. Can't say these negative results are a surprise. B. Can someone remind my why the control group in these studies is never…
RT @papathanasiou_: Angiotensin Receptor–Neprilysin Inhibition in Acute Myocardial Infarction | NEJM https://t.co/0T57fpiRDO
RT @SeguraCardio:
RT @ValleAlfonso: #PARADISE-MI in @NEJM
Angiotensin Receptor–Neprilysin Inhibition in Acute Myocardial Infarction | NEJM https://t.co/KYUOk5sX7O
RT @papathanasiou_: Angiotensin Receptor–Neprilysin Inhibition in Acute Myocardial Infarction | NEJM https://t.co/0T57fpiRDO
RT @SeguraCardio:
RT @vic_pallares: Angiotensin Receptor–Neprilysin Inhibition in Acute Myocardial Infarction | NEJM https://t.co/d29jt5gVlF PARADISE-MI ➡️S…
Angiotensin Receptor–Neprilysin Inhibition in Acute Myocardial Infarction | NEJM https://t.co/0T57fpiRDO
RT @SeguraCardio:
En pacientes con IAM y FE reducida o congestión pulmonar sacubitril-valsartan no fue superior al ramipril Angiotensin Receptor–Neprilysin Inhibition in Acute Myocardial Infarction | NEJM https://t.co/VKAdSbZrJE
RT @SeguraCardio:
RT @vic_pallares: Angiotensin Receptor–Neprilysin Inhibition in Acute Myocardial Infarction | NEJM https://t.co/d29jt5gVlF PARADISE-MI ➡️S…
RT @SeguraCardio:
RT @MarcoDelBuono3: PARADISE-MI trial:Angiotensin Receptor–Neprilysin Inhibition in Acute Myocardial Infarction https://t.co/IUTXIbFkAK
RT @vic_pallares: Angiotensin Receptor–Neprilysin Inhibition in Acute Myocardial Infarction | NEJM https://t.co/d29jt5gVlF PARADISE-MI ➡️S…
Angiotensin Receptor–Neprilysin Inhibition in Acute Myocardial Infarction | NEJM https://t.co/1MK0Hf5j51
Angiotensin Receptor-Neprilysin Inhibition in Acute Myocardial Infarction https://t.co/1hfkzH5rvr https://t.co/WGt4sptsuC
RT @ValleAlfonso: #PARADISE-MI in @NEJM
RT @ValleAlfonso: #PARADISE-MI in @NEJM
RT @ValleAlfonso: #PARADISE-MI in @NEJM
RT @ValleAlfonso: #PARADISE-MI in @NEJM
RT @vic_pallares: Angiotensin Receptor–Neprilysin Inhibition in Acute Myocardial Infarction | NEJM https://t.co/d29jt5gVlF PARADISE-MI ➡️S…
#PARADISE-MI in @NEJM
RT @adamcifu: A. Can't say these negative results are a surprise. B. Can someone remind my why the control group in these studies is never…
RT @vic_pallares: Angiotensin Receptor–Neprilysin Inhibition in Acute Myocardial Infarction | NEJM https://t.co/d29jt5gVlF PARADISE-MI ➡️S…
Angiotensin Receptor–Neprilysin Inhibition in Acute Myocardial Infarction | NEJM https://t.co/lDkrka469r AMI後短期アウトカム(観察期間中央値22か月)では、ACEiを凌駕することはなかった。 HFrEFの試験結果を考えると、長期間投与によるメリットは期待できると思うが、コストが問題になる
Angiotensin Receptor–Neprilysin Inhibition in Acute Myocardial Infarction | NEJM https://t.co/d29jt5gVlF PARADISE-MI ➡️SAC–VAL was not associated w/ a significantly⤵️ incidence of death from CV causes or incident HF than ramipril among
PARADISE-MI trial:Angiotensin Receptor–Neprilysin Inhibition in Acute Myocardial Infarction https://t.co/IUTXIbFkAK https://t.co/fXrk9eGE8B
Angiotensin Receptor–Neprilysin Inhibition in Acute Myocardial Infarction @NEJM https://t.co/Je312mJpMf
A. Can't say these negative results are a surprise. B. Can someone remind my why the control group in these studies is never equal dose ARB? Angiotensin Receptor–Neprilysin Inhibition in Acute Myocardial Infarction | NEJM https://t.co/1MUjOMz9bn