Synopsis of Social media discussions

Several discussions express strong interest in the article, with phrases like 'Thanks @NIMHgov for the write-up' and references to the study’s significance, highlighting appreciation for the research's relevance. The tone is generally positive and supportive, emphasizing the importance of understanding distressing PLEs, though the depth of engagement is moderate rather than deeply analytical.

A
Agreement
Moderate agreement

Most discussions acknowledge and appreciate the significance of the research, reflected in positive mentions of the publication and its importance.

I
Interest
High level of interest

Posts show high curiosity and enthusiasm for the article, especially referencing new findings and the broader implications for understanding mental health.

E
Engagement
Moderate level of engagement

The discussions involve some engagement, such as thanking organizations and referencing the study's relevance, though lacking detailed critique or deep analysis.

I
Impact
Moderate level of impact

The conversations indicate a recognition that the study's findings could influence future research or clinical practices, but concrete evidence of immediate impact is limited.

Social Mentions

YouTube

2 Videos

Twitter

3 Posts

Blogs

2 Articles

News

9 Articles

Reddit

2 Posts

Metrics

Video Views

44

Total Likes

10

Extended Reach

6,767

Social Features

18

Timeline: Posts about article

Top Social Media Posts

Posts referencing the article

Understanding AI Psychosis and Harm Reduction Strategies

Understanding AI Psychosis and Harm Reduction Strategies

Welcome back to the University of Spiritual Intelligence. In this transmission, I clarify the cultural use of the phrase AI psychosis, distinguishing it from clinical psychosis. This teaching presents practical harm reduction tools for using AI safely, integrating clinical awareness and neurobiological context.

September 21, 2025

30 views


Understanding AI Psychosis and Its Mislabeling Risks

Understanding AI Psychosis and Its Mislabeling Risks

This short transmission separates clinical psychosis from cultural and AI-related distortions. It discusses the harm in mislabeling individuals as psychotic and highlights the role of AI in amplifying vulnerabilities. This content serves as spiritual education and should not substitute for professional advice.

September 21, 2025

14 views


  • UCSF Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences
    @UCSFPsychiatry (Twitter)

    #Research reading: Persistent and distressing psychotic-like experiences using adolescent brain cognitive development℠ study data https://t.co/J8gWrWIg2q #UCSFWeill #psychosis
    view full post

    March 3, 2022

  • WashU Office of Neuroscience Research
    @WashUONR (Twitter)

    RT @karcher_dr: Thanks @NIMHgov for the write-up of our new article “Persistent and distressing psychotic-like experiences using adolescent…
    view full post

    November 18, 2021

    1

  • Nicole Karcher
    @karcher_dr (Twitter)

    Thanks @NIMHgov for the write-up of our new article “Persistent and distressing psychotic-like experiences using adolescent brain cognitive development℠ study data” now out at Molecular Psychiatry! @BarchDbarch https://t.co/ZHenCj5auJ
    view full post

    November 18, 2021

    4

    1

Abstract Synopsis

  • Childhood psychotic-like experiences (PLEs) can indicate potential psychiatric disorders, particularly when they are distressing or persistent.
  • The study analyzed data from the ABCD project, dividing participants into four groups based on the nature of their PLEs: persistent distressing, transient distressing, persistent non-distressing, and transient non-distressing.
  • Results showed that youth with distressing PLEs, especially those that persist, experienced greater developmental delays and mental health challenges, highlighting the need to consider both the distress level and persistence of PLEs in understanding their impact on functioning and mental health.