Discussions frequently praise the quality and robustness of the publication, such as mentioning the 'well conducted/robust methodology,' and express surprise at the findings, like the prediction of efficacy being 'difficult,' reflecting a generally positive yet analytical tone. Words like 'game-changer' and references to new treatment management strategies reveal the importance attributed to these results, although some posts also note side effects like increased dyspareunia, indicating a nuanced engagement with the research.
AgreementModerate agreement
The majority of discussions express support and are surprised by the positive findings, indicating general agreement with the results.
InterestHigh interest
Many posts highlight the significance of the study and describe it as potentially 'game-changing,' showing high interest.
EngagementModerate engagement
Participants reference specific outcomes, such as success rates and side effects like dyspareunia, indicating a moderate level of in-depth engagement.
ImpactModerate impact
The shared excitement about the potential impact on treatment options suggests a moderate to high perceived influence, though not universally groundbreaking.
Abstract in brief
This study compared the effectiveness and safety of single-incision mini-slings versus standard midurethral slings in women with stress urinary incontinence across 21 UK hospitals over 36 months, with success measured by patient-reported improvement roughly one year after surgery.
Results showed that mini-slings were not inferior to midurethral slings, with similar success rates at both 15 and 36 months; minor differences in pain, mesh exposure, and need for further surgery were observed but generally favored midurethral slings for lower mesh exposure and reoperations.
Overall, both procedures improved quality of life and sexual function fairly equally, though dyspareunia (pain during sex) was specifically noted as an issue in some women, highlighting some differences in side effects between the two surgical options.
For stress urinary incontinence in women, mini-slings were noninferior to midurethral slings with respect to patient-reported success at 15 months. https://t.co/Ag5p2u2WZW https://t.co/PcajqXTiLW
Mar 30, 2022 · 27 likes · 14 shares · 935,551 followersView post →
AM
Amy Park, MD
@dramypark · X
Single incision slings were non inferior to midurethral slings, w/similar SUI success rates, but 2x higher rate of dyspareunia, & higher mesh exposure/subsequent SUI surgeries.
Single-Incision Mini-Slings for Stress Urinary Incontinence in Women | NEJM https://t.co/kJvJ3nZuAE
This episode discusses the workup, symptoms, and management options for pelvic organ prolapse and urinary incontinence, highlighting conservative therapies like pelvic floor exercises and surgical options including…
RT @chrisharding123: @MeshCampaign @FPMRS @bsc_urology Have you seen this trial? Well conducted/robust methodology but results I definitely…
Jun 16, 2022 · 2 shares · 489 followersView post →
JP
June (Moderator Scottish Mesh Survivors FB Page)
@junegreenhorn64 · X
RT @chrisharding123: @MeshCampaign @FPMRS @bsc_urology Have you seen this trial? Well conducted/robust methodology but results I definitely…
Jun 16, 2022 · 2 shares · 206 followersView post →
CH
Chris Harding
@chrisharding123 · X
@MeshCampaign @FPMRS @bsc_urology Have you seen this trial? Well conducted/robust methodology but results I definitely didn’t predict! Efficacy equivalent to TVT?? You underline the key point - v difficult to remove without collateral damage. Dyspareunia also 3x higher.
https://t.co/SAjLhF9YxO
Jun 16, 2022 · 1 like · 2 shares · 4,032 followersView post →
II
International Urogynecological Association (IUGA)
@iugaoffice · X
Comparing the effectiveness and safety of newer single-incision mini-slings w/ those of standard midurethral slings from @NEJM
#pelvicfloor #iuga #incontinence
https://t.co/Mpqj6ivSSi
Single-incision mini-slings were noninferior to standard midurethral slings with respect to patient-reported success at 15 months for stress urinary incontinence. @NEJM https://t.co/KpbFFhLBEM
Single incision slings were non inferior to midurethral slings, w/similar SUI success rates, but 2x higher rate of dyspareunia, & higher mesh exposure/subsequent SUI surgeries.
Single-Incision Mini-Slings for Stress Urinary Incontinence in Women | NEJM https://t.co/kJvJ3nZuAE
Interesting results have been published for the SIMS (Single incision mini-slings for Stress Urinary incontinence in Women) study.
Click for info: https://t.co/e45srMS4bL
#proudtodiscover @BarnsleyRD
Apr 1, 2022 · 1 like · 2 shares · 383 followersView post →
H
harlee
@harlee3333 · X
Single-Incision Mini-Slings for Stress Urinary Incontinence in Women https://t.co/YAT4tc9cqF
Mar 31, 2022 · 4 likes · 1 share · 2,482 followersView post →
ID
Inès Dominique
@inesdom40 · X
RT @UrologieParis: Not so often to read a RCT on stress urinary incontinence
Mar 31, 2022 · 2 shares · 455 followersView post →
AF
Alex Friedl
@AlexFriedl85 · X
I did not except these outcomes at all despite of short observational time. Can be a #gamechanger for treatment management in stress #urinaryincotinence ⚠️
https://t.co/OZQ7njpelD
RT @NEJM: For stress urinary incontinence in women, mini-slings were noninferior to midurethral slings with respect to patient-reported suc…
Mar 30, 2022 · 14 shares · 1,822 followersView post →
N
NEJM
@NEJM · X
For stress urinary incontinence in women, mini-slings were noninferior to midurethral slings with respect to patient-reported success at 15 months. https://t.co/Ag5p2u2WZW https://t.co/PcajqXTiLW
Mar 30, 2022 · 27 likes · 14 shares · 935,551 followersView post →
AS
Amr El-Shalakany
@AmrHassanElShal · X
Good work on ureteral slings for sui
https://t.co/z6Cz6JtH9f