Do you use pancreatoscopy
The role of pancreatoscopy in the diagnostic work-up of intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Mentions
Extended reach
Total likes
Video views
Mentions per month
Jun 2022 – Dec 2023Where it's discussed
-
X / Twitter18 posts
-
Facebook3 posts
-
News2 articles
-
YouTube1 videos
AI synopsis
What people are saying
Discussions reflect a thoughtful engagement with the article, with posters citing specific issues such as the risk of adverse events like pancreatitis and how the technique may influence surgical decisions, using words like 'critical' and 'important' to emphasize the relevance of these findings. The tone balances cautious optimism with acknowledgment of the procedure’s limitations, highlighting its potential impact on diagnostic strategies in pancreatic neoplasms.
Most discussions acknowledge the importance of the systematic review and recognize POP's potential role, despite concerns about risks.
Comments show a moderate level of interest, focusing on the application of pancreatoscopy and debates around its safety and effectiveness.
Posts engage with the subject by referencing clinical decision-making, safety concerns, and implications for practice.
The discussions highlight the significance of the publication’s findings in influencing future clinical approaches and research priorities.
Abstract in brief
- This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluate how effective and safe peroral pancreatoscopy (POP) is for diagnosing intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms (IPMNs) of the pancreas, highlighting that POP has high diagnostic accuracy but a 12% adverse event rate mainly due to mild pancreatitis.
- The studies reviewed show that POP can influence clinical decisions, often leading to changes in surgical plans in about 13.6% of cases, though more research is necessary to clarify its role, especially during intraoperative procedures.
- Overall, POP is mostly successful and provides detailed visual clues for IPMN diagnosis, but future studies are needed to better understand its full potential and optimize its safety and effectiveness in managing these pancreatic tumors.]
Top posts
Most liked on X and BlueskyThe role of pancreatoscopy in the diagnostic work-up of intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms: a systematic review and meta-analysis by David M. de Jong et al. Read more here: https://t.co/5mvYducPdE https://t.co/vpLMJbU8y8
@MStott88 @NEndoscopy @sentigastro @helpatologist @abdullahaabbasi @teoh_anthony @abubakarhaf @Abuhilal9Abu @gvraoaig @DerbyPBunit @ClarisaSurgeon @Jawad004 @zaedHamady @jim_portal Was involved in recent overview of pancreatoscopy in IPMN. https://t.co/ROxewr8awR Critical is whether risks (the obvious, + fatal PEP reported..) outweigh benefits (ie change Mx based on imaging/EUS. For us ratio of Spy for PD stones v IPMN > 100:1.. @helpatologist @NEndoscopy
RT @endoscopyjrnl: The role of pancreatoscopy in the diagnostic work-up of intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms: a systematic review an…
RT @Gio_Marchegiani: Do you use pancreatoscopy
#podcast The role of pancreatoscopy in the diagnostic work-up of intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms: a systematic review... by David M. de Jong, Pauline M. C. Stassen, Bas Groot Koerkamp et al. More here: https://t.co/5mvYducPdE Listen on YouTube: https://t.co/WJ7I1W64qe
All mentions
Assessing Pancreatoscopy for Diagnosing Intraductal Papillary Mucinous Neoplasms
This systematic review evaluates the effectiveness and safety of peroral pancreatoscopy for diagnosing IPMNs, highlighting high diagnostic accuracy and a 12% adverse event rate, mainly mild pancreatitis, and its impact…
@MStott88 @NEndoscopy @sentigastro @helpatologist @abdullahaabbasi @teoh_anthony @abubakarhaf @Abuhilal9Abu @gvraoaig @DerbyPBunit @ClarisaSurgeon @Jawad004 @zaedHamady @jim_portal Was involved in recent overview of pancreatoscopy in IPMN. https://t.co/ROxewr8awR Critical is whether risks (the obvious, + fatal PEP reported..) outweigh benefits (ie change Mx based on imaging/EUS. For us ratio of Spy for PD stones v IPMN > 100:1.. @helpatologist @NEndoscopy
#podcast The role of pancreatoscopy in the diagnostic work-up of intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms: a systematic review... by David M. de Jong, Pauline M. C. Stassen, Bas Groot Koerkamp et al. More here: https://t.co/5mvYducPdE Listen on YouTube: https://t.co/WJ7I1W64qe
RT @endoscopyjrnl: The role of pancreatoscopy in the diagnostic work-up of intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms: a systematic review an…
RT @endoscopyjrnl: The role of pancreatoscopy in the diagnostic work-up of intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms: a systematic review an…
The role of pancreatoscopy in the diagnostic work-up of intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms: a systematic review and meta-analysis by David M. de Jong et al. Read more here: https://t.co/5mvYducPdE https://t.co/vpLMJbU8y8
RT @Gio_Marchegiani: Do you use pancreatoscopy
RT @Gio_Marchegiani: Do you use pancreatoscopy
RT @Gio_Marchegiani: Do you use pancreatoscopy
RT @Gio_Marchegiani: Do you use pancreatoscopy
RT @Gio_Marchegiani: Do you use pancreatoscopy
RT @Gio_Marchegiani: Do you use pancreatoscopy
RT @Gio_Marchegiani: Do you use pancreatoscopy
RT @Gio_Marchegiani: Do you use pancreatoscopy
RT @Gio_Marchegiani: Do you use pancreatoscopy
RT @Gio_Marchegiani: Do you use pancreatoscopy
RT @Gio_Marchegiani: Do you use pancreatoscopy
Do you use pancreatoscopy
New article: THE ROLE OF PANCREATOSCOPY IN THE DIAGNOSTIC WORK-UP OF INTRA-DUCTAL PAPILLARY MUCINOUS NEOPLASMS: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND META ANALYSIS https://t.co/UBefEpQBZu #pancreaticcancer #oncology https://t.co/nQnqPL62Bs
GM
EJ
GW
دا
I
FH
EV
SM
EA
CV
EC
SS
C陳
NC
SA
RV
PO