July 2022 PMID 35768322

Reconsidering academic beliefs about belief in the paranormal.

Dean Radin

Full text PDF Download social card

Mentions

Peak: 4 in Dec 2025

across 3 sources since Jun 2022

Extended reach

10,492

potential audience

Total likes

819

Video views

9,645

Mentions per month

Jun 2022 – Jan 2026

Where it's discussed

YouTube7 videos
Facebook2 posts
X / Twitter1 posts

AI synopsis

What people are saying

The discussions reflect an overall positive and interested tone, with users supporting the article's call for more nuanced research, illustrated by phrases like 'questioning old assumptions' and 'opening new pathways' in the study of paranormal beliefs. These words, along with the tone of curiosity and revision, suggest a constructive dialogue aiming to reshape academic perspectives.

AgreementModerate agreement

Most discussions acknowledge the value of re-evaluating traditional academic views, with some explicitly supporting the idea that beliefs in the paranormal deserve more nuanced investigation.

InterestHigh interest

The majority of social discussions show high curiosity, emphasizing the importance of understanding paranormal beliefs from psychological and cultural perspectives.

EngagementModerate engagement

Participants engage by debating the relevance of the research methods and contemplating the broader implications, although some comments remain relatively surface-level.

ImpactModerate impact

The discourse indicates a moderate potential for influencing academic attitudes, as the conversations highlight the need for more open-minded scientific approaches.

Abstract in brief

The text discusses how current academic views on believing in the paranormal might be outdated or too dismissive of people's experiences and beliefs.
It suggests that researchers should re-evaluate their assumptions and methods when studying paranormal beliefs to better understand why people hold these views.
The article emphasizes the importance of approaching paranormal beliefs with an open mind, considering cultural and psychological factors, rather than simply dismissing them as irrational.]

Read the full abstract