Synopsis of Social media discussions

Several discussions highlight alarming findings from the publication, such as the assertion that rainwater is no longer safe to drink anywhere globally. Phrases like 'forever chemicals' and 'toxic' underscore the urgency and gravity of the situation. The use of assertive language conveys a serious tone, contributing to the emergent theme of environmental and public health crisis reflected in many shared insights.

A
Agreement
Moderate agreement

Most discussions reflect a consensus on the seriousness of PFAS contamination and agree with the findings of the publication.

I
Interest
High level of interest

There is a notable level of curiosity and ongoing discussions regarding the implications and dangers of PFAS in rainwater and broader environments.

E
Engagement
High engagement

Many users delve into the details of the study, sharing insights and referencing specific data that highlights the pervasiveness of PFAS.

I
Impact
High level of impact

Participants express that PFAS contamination poses a substantial threat to both human health and environmental safety, signaling a widespread concern.

Social Mentions

YouTube

2 Videos

Bluesky

1 Posts

Facebook

4 Posts

Twitter

107 Posts

Blogs

18 Articles

News

377 Articles

Reddit

39 Posts

Metrics

Video Views

13,314

Total Likes

2,575

Extended Reach

594,727

Social Features

548

Timeline: Posts about article

Top Social Media Posts

Posts referencing the article

PFAS Contamination: Analyzing Global Environmental Risks

PFAS Contamination: Analyzing Global Environmental Risks

Something alarming is occurring on our planet. Scientists have discovered concerning anomalies in the rainwater and atmosphere related to PFAS contamination, with levels often exceeding health advisory limits. Explore the urgent need to address these environmental impacts.

August 22, 2025

10,284 views


October 13, 2025

3,030 views


  • Cerebro Digital
    @cerebrodigital.net (Bluesky)

    Un estudio advierte que el agua de lluvia contiene niveles peligrosos de “químicos eternos”, volviéndola insegura para el consumo humano en cualquier parte del mundo, incluso en zonas remotas. DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.2c02765 Te explicamos más aquí: cerebrodigital.net/agua-llu...
    view full post

    October 6, 2025

    4

    7


  • @miguelbardales (Twitter)

    Los días en los que podías beber agua de lluvia han terminado. Estudios recientes revelaron niveles tan elevados de químicos, que ya no es segura beberla en ninguna parte del planeta, por más lejos de la civilización que estés. DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.2c02765 https://t.co/UzBdr4SZbJ
    view full post

    August 7, 2025

    2

    1

  • rikdog
    @rikdog47 (Twitter)

    @JonEntine You are completely belligerent and ignorant. There is wide spread environmental toxicity. There is no risk assessment that says glyphosphate is "less toxic than salt". https://t.co/tPd8Nu99AR https://t.co/1SnjbBFt1P
    view full post

    February 17, 2025

  • Hermetic Order of Randolph de St. Germain
    @horsgBand (Twitter)

    RT @Alexa2B74: #PFAS - Per & polyfluoroalkyl substances "polluants éternels" 21000 sites contaminés en
    view full post

    August 22, 2024

    2

  • Agnes Werpachowska
    @Perperuna2 (Twitter)

    @EGHaug @hilde_alex_ @utbytteprinsen Plast, stadig økende forurensning med evigvarende kjemikalier, for å nevne de viktigste - forskernes advarsler om dem er like alarmerende, og løsningene er enkle. Så hvorfor overser den grønne bevegelsen dette? https://t.co/cg5Uvt1svX https://t.co/lbHl8MNLF5
    view full post

    June 28, 2024

    1

  • Agnes Werpachowska
    @Perperuna2 (Twitter)

    TL;DR: Don't drink rainwater - wherever you live, as long it's planet Earth - because it's full of forever chemicals, beyond the safety norms. And it grows. https://t.co/lbHl8MOjuD
    view full post

    June 26, 2024

  • Xenek Stoehr
    @xeneks (Twitter)

    @dimozz1 @KateM45 @jonburkeUK @The_RHS Here is an example. The word 'toxic' is used too often. I really don’t like using it inappropriately. However, in some situations, it is actually the appropriate word. https://t.co/IBIgDfw7bE https://t.co/i4fJoQp0ox https://t.co/9pOlUSQRX0
    view full post

    May 13, 2024

  • Paul Whyte
    @PaulGelWorks (Twitter)

    @SapplLeon @ectoterrestria1 @EliotJacobson https://t.co/CNH8bKNSXX
    view full post

    April 20, 2024

  • Miquel Porta
    @miquelporta (Twitter)

    RT @miquelporta: Outside the Safe Operating Space of a New Planetary Boundary for Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances (PFAS) | Environmenta…
    view full post

    April 10, 2024

    3

  • SophieGraves
    @SophieGr123 (Twitter)

    @ian_charles007 @ximmat That is what the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) advises (is that real and valid? that is your call) and here is the study: https://t.co/KkEmhtrj9P
    view full post

    March 27, 2024

  • Janne M. Korhonen is moving to BSky & LinkedIn!
    @jmkorhonen (Twitter)

    Ja kun näiltä kemikaaleilta ei pääse pakoon. Esimerkiksi tässä tutkimuksessa _mistään_ Maapallolta ei löydetty vesinäytettä, jossa ei olisi ollut PFAS-kemikaaleja. Jopa Etelänavalle satanut lumi oli saastunutta (!!!). https://t.co/Xws3A9uLC7
    view full post

    March 25, 2024

    12

  • Christopher Overton
    @Christo27393002 (Twitter)

    If you think climate change is the only planetary boundaries issues, consider pfas https://t.co/07RVx9hrMJ
    view full post

    March 16, 2024

  • one valbanill after another |
    @valbanill (Twitter)

    only slightly related, but rainwater is completely undrinkable everywhere in the world now https://t.co/V4JW2jxDu5 https://t.co/oRNw1xUQF5
    view full post

    March 11, 2024

    1

  • Thomas Bratananium
    @bratananium (Twitter)

    @kepelch @NRDC #8F52.2 PFAS are now found in our air, water, food, homes and bodies (~98% of people in the US have PFAS in their blood). https://t.co/kKOpekntkR https://t.co/nslCYUJ1xD https://t.co/rLh3QKabPG https://t.co/OBVatWkO83
    view full post

    February 3, 2024

  • { name : 'Carlos Pastén' }
    @MaoParadise (Twitter)

    @copano noticia de la bbc https://t.co/sbg7SrVj5X y el consiguiente estudio de la revista the journal Environmental Science & Technology en la que se basa https://t.co/ebahtjvrgZ
    view full post

    January 22, 2024

  • PedrosBanioles
    @Pedros_Banioles (Twitter)

    @MirandaKR88 @todayyearsoldig https://t.co/hY8nQZENTo Maybe it was fine before we ruined it
    view full post

    January 21, 2024

  • GoateattingBanana
    @GoatandBanana (Twitter)

    @BFMTV Un problème connexe est que les source d'eaux douces ne sont pour la plupart pas potables du fait de la pollution issue de l'agriculture intensive, les effluents de l'industrie et autres. Même les eaux de pluie sont polluées (par exemple par les PFAS: https://t.co/AN4ZlZ855e)
    view full post

    September 8, 2023

  • Miquel Porta
    @miquelporta (Twitter)

    RT @miquelporta: Outside the Safe Operating Space of a New Planetary Boundary for Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances (PFAS) | Environmenta…
    view full post

    August 30, 2023

    3

  • Mister Beakhead Kval
    @prog_moment (Twitter)

    @MitchATreadwell @OregonMapGuy You would be contesting the study, then, which states that around the globe that rainwater has elevated levels of PFAS. It doesn't matter how ununiform it is if it's ubiquitous the way that it is. https://t.co/xT1uYhKtWe
    view full post

    August 21, 2023

  • Back to Nature for Health and Survival
    @wild_weed_woman (Twitter)

    A new study https://t.co/tJFdENj1sT found that rainwater is unsafe to drink no matter where you are on Earth. (credit - Homestead Survival site). If it's unsafe for humans it's unsafe for wildlife and probably vegetation.
    view full post

    August 18, 2023

  • Tabatha
    @araran100 (Twitter)

    RT @keisuke4713: PFAS安全値⬆️ https://t.co/EgVwftd3sX 1)雨水PFOAとPFOS
    view full post

    July 28, 2023

    1

  • Antonio Palomar
    @GarcPalomar (Twitter)

    RT @miquelporta: Outside the Safe Operating Space of a New Planetary Boundary for Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances (PFAS) | Environmenta…
    view full post

    July 20, 2023

    3

  • Miquel Porta
    @miquelporta (Twitter)

    Outside the Safe Operating Space of a New Planetary Boundary for Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances (PFAS) | Environmental Science & Technology https://t.co/czeQ9bXrj2
    view full post

    July 20, 2023

    2

    3

  • Evelijn
    @evelijn63 (Twitter)

    https://t.co/DiRh9B4tc8
    view full post

    July 4, 2023

  • Harry Baker
    @harryjpbaker (Twitter)

    @KaleKonscious Hi Kailey! Here is the study link: https://t.co/lx7GhFpSxP It was linked higher up in the story :)
    view full post

    June 30, 2023

  • schumacher
    @schumac07895651 (Twitter)

    A new study has found that rainwater on Earth contains cancer-causing ‘forever chemicals’.The findings suggest that people should avoid drinking or using rainwater as it could be harmful to their health. https://t.co/tLkIZmCVdx
    view full post

    June 18, 2023

  • Hans Peter Arp
    @hanspeterarp (Twitter)

    @IanTCousins @jrockstrom @SafeJustPlanet @Nature They discuss novel entities in the paper, and mention that they did not include it on the figure based on difficulty7compexity to get numbers. They could have just used #PFAS from your paper! https://t.co/ydJ2UV0ESl Missed opportunity!
    view full post

    May 31, 2023

    4

  • Patricia Klatt
    @PFASDilemma (Twitter)

    only a „little fact„ to remember https://t.co/fB7ECTep4B
    view full post

    May 19, 2023

  • Liberfratelo
    @liberfratelo (Twitter)

    RT @JuanBordera: Adjunto el paper (estaba dentro del hilo, en el segundo tuit, pero así está más a la vista) https://t.co/XYwbPzij96
    view full post

    May 12, 2023

    18

  • tjisdudels
    @Tjisdudels (Twitter)

    @0Life4 @OooBardam @Babygravy9 There are microplastics in all rain. They've found microplastics in the Arctic and Antarctica. https://t.co/nPbZLfFyCT
    view full post

    May 10, 2023

  • Jm Robert
    @complodebutant (Twitter)

    RT @Alexa2B74: #PFAS - Per & polyfluoroalkyl substances "polluants éternels" 21000 sites contaminés en
    view full post

    March 4, 2023

    2

  • Alexª-2B #PFM
    @Alexa2B74 (Twitter)

    #PFAS - Per & polyfluoroalkyl substances "polluants éternels" 21000 sites contaminés en
    view full post

    March 3, 2023

    1

    2

  • Liz Gonzalez
    @EKGonzalez1979 (Twitter)

    Outside the Safe Operating Space of a New Planetary Boundary for Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances (PFAS) https://t.co/YKuCXVJF3e @theresecoffey Serious case for us all. Can it be banned?It was banned at US
    view full post

    February 25, 2023

  • Vreni
    @Vreni25021990 (Twitter)

    RT @Schleh_Tox: Quelle für die Regenwasser-Verseuchung: https://t.co/QBf4ychcdI
    view full post

    February 23, 2023

    34

  • g
    @ste74317381 (Twitter)

    Pfas Jahrhundertgift überall... https://t.co/ap8cGlctx0
    view full post

    February 23, 2023

  • Valentinian's Third Bear
    @corbinians_bear (Twitter)

    RT @StephenPiment: Outside the Safe Operating Space of a New Planetary Boundary for Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances (PFAS) https://t.co…
    view full post

    February 6, 2023

    1

  • Stephen Pimentel
    @StephenPiment (Twitter)

    Outside the Safe Operating Space of a New Planetary Boundary for Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances (PFAS) https://t.co/ClwFdO4cFF
    view full post

    February 4, 2023

    1

  • hek! ⚙️
    @hktsre (Twitter)

    Hey remember when rain became bad to drink worldwide? https://t.co/HTclWxwjMM
    view full post

    January 24, 2023

    3

  • Ludangi
    @ludangi (Twitter)

    RT @josephmjauregui: @IneEstevez El trabajo es este: https://t.co/IP3tff9Nq3 Habla de sustancias tóxicas llamadas PFAs. No se usan en miner…
    view full post

    January 21, 2023

    24

  • Capitalism is Why We Have Fascism
    @Chaologistician (Twitter)

    @eric_kleppel @AquaTeenMarxist Um, that would be true if the entire planet *weren't* being flooded with toxic chemicals on a regular basis. https://t.co/axKm4jPqZa
    view full post

    January 21, 2023

  • Emma Emma
    @Mia7165275 (Twitter)

    RT @GLeoBon01: https://t.co/J5NxgbQoAG https://t.co/uTkb1ws3iv
    view full post

    January 20, 2023

    1

  • ODS Planeta - Agua, Tierra y Alimentos
    @Ods6S (Twitter)

    RT @josephmjauregui: @IneEstevez El trabajo es este: https://t.co/IP3tff9Nq3 Habla de sustancias tóxicas llamadas PFAs. No se usan en miner…
    view full post

    January 20, 2023

    24

  • Abel Lauck
    @AbelLauck (Twitter)

    RT @josephmjauregui: @IneEstevez El trabajo es este: https://t.co/IP3tff9Nq3 Habla de sustancias tóxicas llamadas PFAs. No se usan en miner…
    view full post

    January 19, 2023

    24

  • JOSEMA VILLARREAL
    @VILLAJOSE7300 (Twitter)

    RT @josephmjauregui: Vayan a las fuentes. SIEMPRE. No crean todo lo que leen. Tener muchos seguidores no significa ser idóneo en un tema. A…
    view full post

    January 18, 2023

    20

  • Nacho Liceaga
    @nacholiceaga (Twitter)

    RT @josephmjauregui: Vayan a las fuentes. SIEMPRE. No crean todo lo que leen. Tener muchos seguidores no significa ser idóneo en un tema. A…
    view full post

    January 18, 2023

    20

  • Franco Rossi
    @Franco_Rossi19 (Twitter)

    RT @josephmjauregui: @IneEstevez El trabajo es este: https://t.co/IP3tff9Nq3 Habla de sustancias tóxicas llamadas PFAs. No se usan en miner…
    view full post

    January 18, 2023

    24

  • RAFA
    @rafadiez_ (Twitter)

    RT @josephmjauregui: @IneEstevez El trabajo es este: https://t.co/IP3tff9Nq3 Habla de sustancias tóxicas llamadas PFAs. No se usan en miner…
    view full post

    January 18, 2023

    24

  • LOLA MORA
    @LOLAMORA2005 (Twitter)

    RT @josephmjauregui: @IneEstevez El trabajo es este: https://t.co/IP3tff9Nq3 Habla de sustancias tóxicas llamadas PFAs. No se usan en miner…
    view full post

    January 18, 2023

    24

  • Aeg~
    @undergramos_7 (Twitter)

    RT @josephmjauregui: @IneEstevez El trabajo es este: https://t.co/IP3tff9Nq3 Habla de sustancias tóxicas llamadas PFAs. No se usan en miner…
    view full post

    January 18, 2023

    24

  • MBallhorst
    @MatiBallhorst (Twitter)

    RT @josephmjauregui: Vayan a las fuentes. SIEMPRE. No crean todo lo que leen. Tener muchos seguidores no significa ser idóneo en un tema. A…
    view full post

    January 18, 2023

    20

  • Santi Molinari
    @Santiago_M7 (Twitter)

    RT @josephmjauregui: @IneEstevez El trabajo es este: https://t.co/IP3tff9Nq3 Habla de sustancias tóxicas llamadas PFAs. No se usan en miner…
    view full post

    January 18, 2023

    24

  • Coco
    @Joni_Damiani (Twitter)

    RT @josephmjauregui: @IneEstevez El trabajo es este: https://t.co/IP3tff9Nq3 Habla de sustancias tóxicas llamadas PFAs. No se usan en miner…
    view full post

    January 18, 2023

    24

  • The_Dude
    @DavidShidai (Twitter)

    RT @josephmjauregui: @IneEstevez El trabajo es este: https://t.co/IP3tff9Nq3 Habla de sustancias tóxicas llamadas PFAs. No se usan en miner…
    view full post

    January 18, 2023

    24

  • FRANCO BARROSO
    @_francobarroso_ (Twitter)

    RT @josephmjauregui: @IneEstevez El trabajo es este: https://t.co/IP3tff9Nq3 Habla de sustancias tóxicas llamadas PFAs. No se usan en miner…
    view full post

    January 18, 2023

    24

  • Sopa
    @SopAgro (Twitter)

    RT @josephmjauregui: Vayan a las fuentes. SIEMPRE. No crean todo lo que leen. Tener muchos seguidores no significa ser idóneo en un tema. A…
    view full post

    January 18, 2023

    20

  • Luciano Francou
    @LucianoFrancou (Twitter)

    RT @josephmjauregui: Vayan a las fuentes. SIEMPRE. No crean todo lo que leen. Tener muchos seguidores no significa ser idóneo en un tema. A…
    view full post

    January 18, 2023

    20

  • ©®15
    @CrisVegaZ (Twitter)

    RT @josephmjauregui: @IneEstevez El trabajo es este: https://t.co/IP3tff9Nq3 Habla de sustancias tóxicas llamadas PFAs. No se usan en miner…
    view full post

    January 18, 2023

    24

  • Alberto Ayciriet
    @betoayciriet (Twitter)

    RT @josephmjauregui: Vayan a las fuentes. SIEMPRE. No crean todo lo que leen. Tener muchos seguidores no significa ser idóneo en un tema. A…
    view full post

    January 18, 2023

    20

  • Mariano Luna
    @marianoluna79 (Twitter)

    RT @josephmjauregui: Vayan a las fuentes. SIEMPRE. No crean todo lo que leen. Tener muchos seguidores no significa ser idóneo en un tema. A…
    view full post

    January 18, 2023

    20

  • Pipo
    @Antonios670 (Twitter)

    RT @josephmjauregui: Vayan a las fuentes. SIEMPRE. No crean todo lo que leen. Tener muchos seguidores no significa ser idóneo en un tema. A…
    view full post

    January 18, 2023

    20

  • Cosa Linda
    @cosalinda1410 (Twitter)

    RT @josephmjauregui: @IneEstevez El trabajo es este: https://t.co/IP3tff9Nq3 Habla de sustancias tóxicas llamadas PFAs. No se usan en miner…
    view full post

    January 18, 2023

    24

  • Pablo Scroffa
    @pabloscroffa (Twitter)

    RT @josephmjauregui: @IneEstevez El trabajo es este: https://t.co/IP3tff9Nq3 Habla de sustancias tóxicas llamadas PFAs. No se usan en miner…
    view full post

    January 18, 2023

    24

  • Silvia Segovia
    @silviaguimor (Twitter)

    RT @josephmjauregui: Vayan a las fuentes. SIEMPRE. No crean todo lo que leen. Tener muchos seguidores no significa ser idóneo en un tema. A…
    view full post

    January 18, 2023

    20

  • Zeus
    @francozeuss (Twitter)

    RT @josephmjauregui: @IneEstevez El trabajo es este: https://t.co/IP3tff9Nq3 Habla de sustancias tóxicas llamadas PFAs. No se usan en miner…
    view full post

    January 18, 2023

    24

  • Yaaasser Arafat
    @Yaaasser_Arafat (Twitter)

    @Babygravy9 Speaking of PFAS, it’s almost moot at this point — they’ve infiltrated the water cycle. Maybe you don’t directly rely on rainwater to drink, but the plants you eat sure do. And if you eat animals, they’re accumulating the constitutive PFAS from herbivory https://t.co/cGeCBIU5Wu
    view full post

    January 17, 2023

  • Ministerio de la Fantasía-Republica Argentina
    @globosevich (Twitter)

    RT @josephmjauregui: @IneEstevez El trabajo es este: https://t.co/IP3tff9Nq3 Habla de sustancias tóxicas llamadas PFAs. No se usan en miner…
    view full post

    January 17, 2023

    24

  • Ana Antonella Fontana
    @AnaFontana3 (Twitter)

    RT @josephmjauregui: Vayan a las fuentes. SIEMPRE. No crean todo lo que leen. Tener muchos seguidores no significa ser idóneo en un tema. A…
    view full post

    January 17, 2023

    20

  • Balbito (Alberto Balbarrey)
    @Balbito2 (Twitter)

    RT @josephmjauregui: Vayan a las fuentes. SIEMPRE. No crean todo lo que leen. Tener muchos seguidores no significa ser idóneo en un tema. A…
    view full post

    January 17, 2023

    20

  • Mínimas da Sol
    @MinimasdaSol (Twitter)

    RT @josephmjauregui: Vayan a las fuentes. SIEMPRE. No crean todo lo que leen. Tener muchos seguidores no significa ser idóneo en un tema. A…
    view full post

    January 17, 2023

    20

  • Estefania
    @EstefaniaF22 (Twitter)

    RT @josephmjauregui: Vayan a las fuentes. SIEMPRE. No crean todo lo que leen. Tener muchos seguidores no significa ser idóneo en un tema. A…
    view full post

    January 17, 2023

    20

  • María Florencia Arietto
    @florenciarietto (Twitter)

    RT @josephmjauregui: Vayan a las fuentes. SIEMPRE. No crean todo lo que leen. Tener muchos seguidores no significa ser idóneo en un tema. A…
    view full post

    January 17, 2023

    20

  • Tomas gortari
    @tgortari (Twitter)

    RT @josephmjauregui: @IneEstevez El trabajo es este: https://t.co/IP3tff9Nq3 Habla de sustancias tóxicas llamadas PFAs. No se usan en miner…
    view full post

    January 17, 2023

    24

  • Esteban Bilbao
    @esmangrullo (Twitter)

    RT @josephmjauregui: Vayan a las fuentes. SIEMPRE. No crean todo lo que leen. Tener muchos seguidores no significa ser idóneo en un tema. A…
    view full post

    January 17, 2023

    20

  • Mayra
    @MayraBorri (Twitter)

    RT @josephmjauregui: @IneEstevez El trabajo es este: https://t.co/IP3tff9Nq3 Habla de sustancias tóxicas llamadas PFAs. No se usan en miner…
    view full post

    January 17, 2023

    24

  • GastonBon
    @GLeoBon01 (Twitter)

    https://t.co/J5NxgbQoAG https://t.co/uTkb1ws3iv
    view full post

    January 17, 2023

    1

    1

  • Rosendo Sigfrido
    @RosendoSigfrido (Twitter)

    RT @josephmjauregui: @IneEstevez El trabajo es este: https://t.co/IP3tff9Nq3 Habla de sustancias tóxicas llamadas PFAs. No se usan en miner…
    view full post

    January 17, 2023

    24

  • Braca
    @Braca2013 (Twitter)

    RT @josephmjauregui: @IneEstevez El trabajo es este: https://t.co/IP3tff9Nq3 Habla de sustancias tóxicas llamadas PFAs. No se usan en miner…
    view full post

    January 17, 2023

    24

  • Tina
    @SrtaLuisa2020 (Twitter)

    RT @josephmjauregui: @IneEstevez El trabajo es este: https://t.co/IP3tff9Nq3 Habla de sustancias tóxicas llamadas PFAs. No se usan en miner…
    view full post

    January 17, 2023

    24

  • Eliana Goicouria
    @ElianaGoicouria (Twitter)

    RT @josephmjauregui: Vayan a las fuentes. SIEMPRE. No crean todo lo que leen. Tener muchos seguidores no significa ser idóneo en un tema. A…
    view full post

    January 17, 2023

    20

  • kumbancha volante
    @kumbanchaV (Twitter)

    RT @josephmjauregui: @IneEstevez El trabajo es este: https://t.co/IP3tff9Nq3 Habla de sustancias tóxicas llamadas PFAs. No se usan en miner…
    view full post

    January 17, 2023

    24

  • Cristian Pedro Simon
    @cpsimon59 (Twitter)

    RT @josephmjauregui: Vayan a las fuentes. SIEMPRE. No crean todo lo que leen. Tener muchos seguidores no significa ser idóneo en un tema. A…
    view full post

    January 17, 2023

    20

  • Constanza
    @cospeart (Twitter)

    RT @josephmjauregui: @IneEstevez El trabajo es este: https://t.co/IP3tff9Nq3 Habla de sustancias tóxicas llamadas PFAs. No se usan en miner…
    view full post

    January 17, 2023

    24

  • José Jáuregui
    @josephmjauregui (Twitter)

    Vayan a las fuentes. SIEMPRE. No crean todo lo que leen. Tener muchos seguidores no significa ser idóneo en un tema. Acá el artículo: https://t.co/IP3tff9Nq3 https://t.co/lcA4WX9a2V
    view full post

    January 17, 2023

    113

    20

  • José Jáuregui
    @josephmjauregui (Twitter)

    @IneEstevez El trabajo es este: https://t.co/IP3tff9Nq3 Habla de sustancias tóxicas llamadas PFAs. No se usan en minería, ni "fumigaciones", ni "agrotóxicos". Se usan en productos de limpieza, telas resistentes al agua, papel antiadherente, productos de higiene personal y otras telas.
    view full post

    January 17, 2023

    177

    24

  • Guido
    @GuidoLupaz (Twitter)

    @fedeva7 https://t.co/OMyBg1iMHo
    view full post

    January 17, 2023

  • Naizam (Nai) Jaffer
    @NaiJaffer (Twitter)

    As a kid, do you remember tilting your head back, mouth open, catching raindrops? Don’t do that anymore. Researchers suggest a planetary boundary has been exceeded due to #PFAS levels in #environmental media being above guideline levels. #rain #water https://t.co/kLUAN8CqyY
    view full post

    January 5, 2023

  • deive
    @deivei (Twitter)

    RT @physorg_space: #PFAS: you can't smell, see or taste these chemicals, but they are everywhere—and they're highly toxic to humans @Conver…
    view full post

    January 5, 2023

    7

  • Phys.org Space News
    @physorg_space (Twitter)

    #PFAS: you can't smell, see or taste these chemicals, but they are everywhere—and they're highly toxic to humans @ConversationEDU https://t.co/zGoqdNkZHV https://t.co/097yGB3zo8
    view full post

    January 5, 2023

    7

    7

  • Андрiй Стрельнiков 25%+
    @nexussturn (Twitter)

    RT @naukaiprogress: Дождевая вода во всем мире содержит канцероген (Polyfluoroalkyl Substances, PFAS) уровень которого существенно превышае…
    view full post

    January 2, 2023

    9

  • Michaël V. Dandrieux
    @mvdandrieux (Twitter)

    Mais, depuis cette année, l’eau de pluie a tout simplement cessée d’être potable partout dans le monde, du fait d’une contamination généralisée aux per- et polyfluoroalkyl. La planète n’est plus un lieu sûr pour les humains qui y habitent. https://t.co/wDW3ZmUtd9
    view full post

    January 1, 2023

  • Jérémy Lal
    @kapouer (Twitter)

    @Qraaal Passionnant. Tiens d'ailleurs https://t.co/CKQKWuRwFm faudrait voir si ces procédés de fabrication peuvent faire sans...
    view full post

    December 27, 2022

  • ⏚ Euler Geek
    @EulerGeek (Twitter)

    @MKiwee @MacLesggy Le lien vers le pdf de l’article de cette revue avec comité de lecture : https://t.co/Hy8Lm9wna9
    view full post

    December 23, 2022

  • Jérémy Lal
    @kapouer (Twitter)

    RT @lefilsdejoie: @MacLesggy Ce ne sont pas les mineraux qui sont en cause mais les niveaux de PFAS une famille qui compte 4000 composés ch…
    view full post

    December 23, 2022

    1

  • ⏚ Euler Geek
    @EulerGeek (Twitter)

    @BelloeilM @MacLesggy Il a publié avec d’autres scientifiques dans la revue scientifique Environmental Science & Technology à comité de lecture, revue de facteur d'impact égal à 11.357. Il n’y a donc strictement rien à redire, les faits sont là. https://t.co/Hy8Lm9eLLz
    view full post

    December 23, 2022

  • lefilsdejoie
    @lefilsdejoie (Twitter)

    @MacLesggy Ce ne sont pas les mineraux qui sont en cause mais les niveaux de PFAS une famille qui compte 4000 composés chimiques. Dans des zones les + reculées comme au tibet, les taux de PFOA y sont 14 fois + élevés que les avis US pour les eaux potables. https://t.co/rqxNc0cRzP
    view full post

    December 23, 2022

    1

  • Jennifer Faust
    @JFaustDoesChem (Twitter)

    The alarming compilation of rainwater results by @IanTCousins et al. showing just how ubiquitous PFAS are in the global environment (3/5) https://t.co/cZCuW6YuAi
    view full post

    December 20, 2022

    1

  • Ðyutita
    @RNemos (Twitter)

    https://t.co/zuJ7B4Ulif
    view full post

    December 8, 2022

    1

  • Jerry Hyde
    @HydeBlizzardbox (Twitter)

    RT @t_laskaris: https://t.co/tCxzjL6cbx
    view full post

    November 23, 2022

    2

  • 水廻り設備品のWEBショップの中にいるオタクな人
    @otakuna_mizuya (Twitter)

    あくまで一説だけども、論文(英語) https://t.co/oWpdhTfp3z
    view full post

    November 13, 2022

  • Carsten Suhr
    @CarstenSuhr (Twitter)

    RT @HjMalene: PFAS er et globalt problem så stort, at den planetære grænse for forurening med evighedskemikalierne er nået. De er nu også f…
    view full post

    November 13, 2022

    1

  • Itzamnaaj Bahlam III
    @seniorobj (Twitter)

    […] "It is highly problematic that everywhere on Earth, recently proposed health advisories cannot be achieved without large investment in advanced cleanup technology." https://t.co/sTjnTpiCuq
    view full post

    November 6, 2022

  • MScGlobalChange
    @MScGlobalChange (Twitter)

    Outside the Safe Operating Space of a New Planetary Boundary for Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances (PFAS) https://t.co/weEGr8Ic1S
    view full post

    November 3, 2022

  • matt.thigpen
    @matt__thigpen (Twitter)

    get your daily overdose of plastics. i’m sure this has no effects on fruits, vegetables, freshwater fish, or anything else important for life…like trees. maybe when i was a kid thinking everything was ok, the fine people of at the epa were all drunk. https://t.co/5bUKzDRiAg
    view full post

    August 12, 2022

  • Kristen
    @ghostypal (Twitter)

    Study: https://t.co/60qodbU5td
    view full post

    August 11, 2022

  • Heaton Moor Park
    @heatonmoorpark (Twitter)

    Rainwater and the park: Rainwater everywhere on Earth unsafe to drink due to ‘forever chemicals’, PFAS....... Outside the Safe Operating Space of a New Planetary Boundary for Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances (PFAS) ..... https://t.co/VoJBBeWli2 #rainwater #chemicals
    view full post

    August 10, 2022

  • Political alt
    @adeptstack (Twitter)

    @snarkipelago @euronewsgreen Took two seconds of Googling: https://t.co/j2e8VkSAxT
    view full post

    August 9, 2022

  • Kip Austin Hinton
    @kipaustinhinton (Twitter)

    @euronewsgreen Your article and thread both failed to link to the actual peer-reviewed paper. You won't even tell readers the title? You just keep calling it "the study"? When you do science journalism, please include a DOI. https://t.co/rExYypSdSB
    view full post

    August 9, 2022

  • Yannick
    @kindofmagic4u (Twitter)

    Persistent chemical pollutants – in this case, Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances – are now ubiquitous (e. g. due to precipation), and often exceed (recommended) drinking water limits: cf. review paper by Ian Cousins et al. (2022), https://t.co/NpB8K3fBiY. #Anthropocene
    view full post

    August 8, 2022

    1

Abstract Synopsis

  • The text explores the idea that contamination from per and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) has surpassed a new planetary boundary, indicated by high levels of specific perfluoroalkyl acids (PFAAs) in global environmental media like rainwater, soils, and surface waters.
  • Key findings show that the levels of PFOA and PFOS in rainwater frequently exceed established health advisory levels, and the overall concentration of these four PFAAs is often above acceptable drinking water limits in multiple regions.
  • The persistence of PFAS in the environment, coupled with their widespread atmospheric deposition, underscores the urgent need to restrict the use and emissions of these substances due to their lasting impact on ecosystems and human health.