Mentions
Extended reach
Total likes
Video views
AI synopsis
The discussions frequently highlight concerns about outdated safety standards, with multiple posts citing specific health risks such as cancer and DNA damage attributed to radiofrequency radiation. Phrases such as 'scientifically incorrect' and 'invalidate health assumptions' reflect a tone of urgency and determination to challenge the current regulatory frameworks, while references to 'government lies' and 'failed protection agencies' amplify feelings of mistrust and alarm regarding public safety.
A majority of discussions indicate support for the publication's conclusions, recognizing the need to rethink established limits.
The discussions show a strong interest in the implications of the research, particularly concerning 5G technology and wireless radiation.
While some discussions are more surface-level, several posts delve into scientific specifics, indicating a moderate level of engagement with the topic.
Many participants perceive the publication as having significant implications for public health and safety regulations.
@RaffaellaRegoli https://t.co/7ELKyuydGm Sicuro al 100%, mettiamolo vicino alle scuole, mi raccomando! Cercate anche pdf dal titolo: “Scientific evidence invalidates health assumptions underlying the FCC and ICNIRP exposure limit determinations for radiofrequency radiation: implications for 5G”.
高周波放射のFCCおよびICNIRPによる曝露限度決定の基礎となる健康上の仮定を無効とする科学的証拠：5Gへの影響 https://t.co/GyD5Knrjh6 誤った仮定に基づくこれらの暴露制限は、労働者、子供、過敏症患者、および一般人口を短期または長期のRFR暴露から適切に保護することはできない。
訳 https://t.co/ch7lwjjQLz
@frankdevocht @DavidWedege ICNIRP, IEEE &FCC limits r based on protection against overheating. Studies used to identify the level are ancient (from the 70s & early 80s) in which animals (a few rats & monkeys) stopped pressing a lever for food at a certain temp. Talk about a joke. https://t.co/b0D9XaU0IX
"Scientific evidence invalidates health assumptions underlying the FCC and ICNIRP exposure limit determinations for radiofrequency radiation: implications for 5G" #EnvironmentalHealth #RFR #5G #Exposures https://t.co/bWpFG3Yq1e
https://t.co/f0Whj0PB1I
Discover the amazing benefits of Lions Mane mushrooms for your brain. This video examines cutting-edge research highlighting how these mushrooms can boost nerve growth and enhance memory, while also addressing critical…
Did you know that the rules for radiofrequency radiation (RFR) exposure were set in the 1990s? This video presents shocking research revealing health risks, including DNA damage and cancer, even at low levels…
We witnessed a crime against Reginans and biological life at the Regina City Council meeting. The council's approval of a cell tower protocol with a setback of only 150 meters, despite evidence of health harm at…
@Isa_Apelsin @elmundoes International Commission on the Biological Effects of Electromagnetic Fields (ICBE-EMF) Environmental Health https://t.co/uM0UGffWzu
@Isa_Apelsin @elmundoes Scientific evidence invalidates health assumptions underlying FCC and ICNIRP. International Commission on the Biological Effects of Electromagnetic Fields (ICBE-EMF) Environmental Health https://t.co/uM0UGffWzu
RT @JorisL1978: @NUnl vraag me af of de smartphone zelf wel zo gezond is. bv https://t.co/zH4JIFGFFs of https://t.co/HG3dqxf9zm .
@NUnl vraag me af of de smartphone zelf wel zo gezond is. bv https://t.co/zH4JIFGFFs of https://t.co/HG3dqxf9zm .
@wizpip @ABridgen @CatzConspiracy Post Script: "Scientific evidence invalidates health assumptions underlying the FCC and ICNIRP exposure limit determinations for radiofrequency radiation: implications for 5G" https://t.co/rfZlU54Q1a
@mcgibax Yes. You don't seem to want to understand, though... https://t.co/4rD8cwgP2Q
@AndereKrant 5g? volgens mij heeft 'de wetenschap' daar wat te doen: These limits must be based on scientific evidence rather than on erroneous assumptions, https://t.co/zH4JIFG7PU (2022). (btw, just wondering)
@aigov_agent @BrianRoemmele Evasive & incorrect answer, so let's focus on facts. International Commission (ICBE-EMF) - "Scientific evidence invalidates health assumptions underlying the FCC and ICNIRP exposure limit determinations for radiofrequency radiation: implications for 5G." https://t.co/JkbxfxHFG0
@MaryAmosKing1 @In2ThinAir Here is another kick below the belt to the non-ionizing radiation deniers but of course, we never hear about it from the FDA, MAHA or HHS. Mr. Kennedy, call your office! https://t.co/OolvEC6KqU
@athenavkern @BGatesIsaPyscho You are woefully misinformed. Do you realize that RF engineers near antennas wear devices that measure exposure and alert them because high RF levels can boil your eyeballs in your skull. https://t.co/KBHDoKuU8y. https://t.co/C5Nl3cqyQ4.
@TakeoYasha @Simon_Jacob1 Du bist ungebildet https://t.co/taxytwpE5H https://t.co/VDNUMoFJfa https://t.co/P24TfrudkU https://t.co/5Hvhr5C0Wl https://t.co/JV4xUURCjZ https://t.co/hfUTI0xNNJ
@NOS just wondering / https://t.co/zH4JIFG7PU of https://t.co/KwrGvjZ94Q misschien moeten scholen, en andere locaties, wel 'white zones' zijn(voor het geval dat).
@NOS goed plan lijkt me (It should also be noted that the thyroid gland is a target organ for RFR from smartphones. A case-control study on mobile phone use suggested an increased risk for thyroid microcarcinoma associated with long-term cell phone use https://t.co/zH4JIFG7PU)
@grok @Don_Daaf @NUnl @grok, richtlijnen voldoen niet, zie https://t.co/zH4JIFG7PU
@NUnl goed plan, hun schedeltjes zijn te dun. (interessant wel: https://t.co/KwrGvjZ94Q en/of https://t.co/zH4JIFG7PU )
@antonioguterres https://t.co/zH4JIFG7PU… and/or this appeal for you, the UN and countries: https://t.co/KwrGvjZ94Q
@NUnl een van de factoren is misschien: https://t.co/zH4JIFG7PU (cancer, 51x vermeld), https://t.co/KwrGvjZ94Q
RT @Anti5GWarrior: Our so-called protection agencies have also failed us and all life on Earth: "Scientific evidence invalidates health as…
Our so-called protection agencies have also failed us and all life on Earth: "Scientific evidence invalidates health assumptions underlying the FCC and ICNIRP exposure limit determinations for radiofrequency radiation: implications for 5G" https://t.co/kWz3G8vsxj
@Willem34580594 @fvdemocratie en niet heel erg onderzocht aldus https://t.co/zH4JIFG7PU en/of https://t.co/KwrGvjZ94Q 'white-zones' svp.
@brenda1974 @locuta los van wat rfk aangaf in deze, het lijkt me wel verstandig immers: https://t.co/zH4JIFG7PU
@drsimonegold i guess this still is the case (?) https://t.co/zH4JIFG7PU
RT @AllisaBlue: @CorinneNokel @connerben
@UN @antonioguterres (i think (?) there's work to do, acc. to https://t.co/zH4JIFG7PU )
Bilimsel kanıtlar, radyo frekansı radyasyonu için FCC ve ICNIRP maruz kalma sınırı belirlemelerinin altında yatan sağlık varsayımlarını geçersiz kılıyor: #5G için çıkarımlar doi: 10.1186/s12940-022-00900-9 https://t.co/qZlws6shEr
@elonmusk https://t.co/zH4JIFGFFs
@MailOnline ("Scientific evidence invalidates health assumptions underlying the FCC and ICNIRP exposure limit determinations for radiofrequency radiation: implications for 5G" ehjournal oct 22)
@BAMA6919 @RealDrJaneRuby is he still pushing his warpspeed products? He (2019) could not wait for 5 and 6G, but (i wonder about this:) 'Scientific evidence invalidates health assumptions underlying the FCC and ICNIRP exposure limit determinations for radiofrequency radiation: implications for 5G (2022)
@naomirwolf perhaps interesting (i wonder about this report) 'Scientific evidence invalidates health assumptions underlying the FCC and ICNIRP exposure limit determinations for radiofrequency radiation: implications for 5G (oct 2022 ehjournal)'
@RuneH19 @RjNol (i dont think 5 is properly tested (eg: 'International EMF Scientist Appeal', or, 'Scientific evidence invalidates health assumptions underlying the FCC and ICNIRP exposure limit determinations ... implications for 5G' (ehjournal). Clinton said sorry in 1995)
https://t.co/2rEwzx3aad
@johnEiid @RobertKennedyJr Yes and it is scientifically incorrect of @mcuban (or anyone else) to attack RFK Jr over warnings regarding WiFi and health https://t.co/FRue8Id5Pg
@elonmusk @RobertKennedyJr It is scientifically incorrect of @mcuban (or anyone else) to attack RFK Jr over warnings regarding WiFi and health https://t.co/FRue8Id5Pg
@BarryYoungNZ @RobertKennedyJr Yes and it is scientifically incorrect of @mcuban (or anyone else) to attack RFK Jr over warnings regarding WiFi and health https://t.co/FRue8Id5Pg
@TheChiefNerd @RobertKennedyJr It is scientifically incorrect of @mcuban (or anyone else) to attack RFK Jr over warnings regarding WiFi and health https://t.co/FRue8Id5Pg
@RobertKennedyJr It is scientifically incorrect of @mcuban to attack RFK Jr over warnings regarding WiFi and health https://t.co/FRue8Id5Pg
@KorpinenLaura Kyse tässä on mikroaaltokuormituksen annoksesta, jolla on haitallisia terveysvaikutuksia. E-kirjalla tämä annos on suuri, paperikirjalla tätä riskiä ei ole. Ja mitä enemmän e-kirjoja, sitä suurempi annos (dose), https://t.co/Q0bcDhD3BB . BTW, kokonaisuuksien hahmottaminen ja
@BradRoth19 The evidence is clear and RF absorption is not just about heating. https://t.co/rfZlU54ibC
@RahmanZahid91 @HazrinTaib @update11111 Environmental Health. (2021). Scientific evidence invalidates health assumptions underlying the FCC and ICNIRP exposure limit determinations for radiofrequency radiation: Implications for 5G. JAMA Oncology. (2021). Radiofrequency radiation and cancer: A review.
https://t.co/aBVUIoYoVp
@TheLancet @TheLancetNeuro Before focusing on climate change, please, could you consider more acute effects from RF: https://t.co/Q0bcDhD3BB (page 4) and from Experimental Shots: https://t.co/0axiHBH3KZ ?
RT @urca1234: @RaffaellaRegoli https://t.co/7ELKyuydGm Sicuro al 100%, mettiamolo vicino alle scuole, mi raccomando! Cercate anche pdf dal…
RT @urca1234: @RaffaellaRegoli https://t.co/7ELKyuydGm Sicuro al 100%, mettiamolo vicino alle scuole, mi raccomando! Cercate anche pdf dal…
RT @urca1234: @RaffaellaRegoli https://t.co/7ELKyuydGm Sicuro al 100%, mettiamolo vicino alle scuole, mi raccomando! Cercate anche pdf dal…
RT @urca1234: @RaffaellaRegoli https://t.co/7ELKyuydGm Sicuro al 100%, mettiamolo vicino alle scuole, mi raccomando! Cercate anche pdf dal…
RT @urca1234: @RaffaellaRegoli https://t.co/7ELKyuydGm Sicuro al 100%, mettiamolo vicino alle scuole, mi raccomando! Cercate anche pdf dal…
RT @urca1234: @RaffaellaRegoli https://t.co/7ELKyuydGm Sicuro al 100%, mettiamolo vicino alle scuole, mi raccomando! Cercate anche pdf dal…
RT @urca1234: @RaffaellaRegoli https://t.co/7ELKyuydGm Sicuro al 100%, mettiamolo vicino alle scuole, mi raccomando! Cercate anche pdf dal…
RT @urca1234: @RaffaellaRegoli https://t.co/7ELKyuydGm Sicuro al 100%, mettiamolo vicino alle scuole, mi raccomando! Cercate anche pdf dal…
RT @urca1234: @RaffaellaRegoli https://t.co/7ELKyuydGm Sicuro al 100%, mettiamolo vicino alle scuole, mi raccomando! Cercate anche pdf dal…
RT @urca1234: @RaffaellaRegoli https://t.co/7ELKyuydGm Sicuro al 100%, mettiamolo vicino alle scuole, mi raccomando! Cercate anche pdf dal…
RT @urca1234: @RaffaellaRegoli https://t.co/7ELKyuydGm Sicuro al 100%, mettiamolo vicino alle scuole, mi raccomando! Cercate anche pdf dal…
RT @urca1234: @RaffaellaRegoli https://t.co/7ELKyuydGm Sicuro al 100%, mettiamolo vicino alle scuole, mi raccomando! Cercate anche pdf dal…
RT @urca1234: @RaffaellaRegoli https://t.co/7ELKyuydGm Sicuro al 100%, mettiamolo vicino alle scuole, mi raccomando! Cercate anche pdf dal…
@RaffaellaRegoli https://t.co/7ELKyuydGm Sicuro al 100%, mettiamolo vicino alle scuole, mi raccomando! Cercate anche pdf dal titolo: “Scientific evidence invalidates health assumptions underlying the FCC and ICNIRP exposure limit determinations for radiofrequency radiation: implications for 5G”.
@TheMaineWire wireless safety guidelines are based on a few monkeys and rats exposed for one hour in the 1980s (ICBE-EMF, 2022-Scientific evidence invalidates health assumptions underlying the FCC and ICNIRP exposure limit determinations for radiofrequency radiation: implications for 5G).
@ivanpuopolo International Commission on the Biological Effects of Electromagnetic Fields (ICBE-EMF) Environmental Health (2022) 21:92 - https://t.co/VGZmR72U7y - https://t.co/nKcxUpRUjv #EMF, #RFR, #5G, #6G, https://t.co/PU0TK1y5dd
@TimoKALehtonen @ErjaTamminen Kommentoin. Monivuotisen shadowbannäyksen takia pistin vain ruutukuvan liitteeksi ja saas nähdä näkyykö vastaukseni muuta kuin "Show more"-painiketta klikkaamalla. Kiitos Timo, jos voit vuorostaan tuohon ketjuun pistää myös tutkimuspaperilinkin ( https://t.co/83S7BHWKPW ).
RT @berkeleyprc: Commission challenges wireless radiation safety limits; calls for moratorium on further rollout of 5G https://t.co/hwHbB2F…
@EdwardJDavey @LibDems See also: Scientific evidence invalidates health assumptions underlying the FCC and ICNIRP exposure limit determinations for radiofrequency radiation: implications for 5G. https://t.co/BIFKmL5qq3
RT @AllisaBlue: @CorinneNokel @connerben
RT @AllisaBlue: @CorinneNokel @connerben
RT @AllisaBlue: @CorinneNokel @connerben
@CorinneNokel @connerben
@JohnStossel @laurenfix This technology still isn't proven safe: Scientific evidence invalidates health assumptions underlying the FCC and ICNIRP exposure limit determinations for radiofrequency radiation: implications for 5G https://t.co/0jqzEnByZ6
RT @berkeleyprc: Commission challenges wireless radiation safety limits; calls for moratorium on further rollout of 5G https://t.co/hwHbB2F…
RT @berkeleyprc: Commission challenges wireless radiation safety limits; calls for moratorium on further rollout of 5G https://t.co/hwHbB2F…
RT @berkeleyprc: Commission challenges wireless radiation safety limits; calls for moratorium on further rollout of 5G https://t.co/hwHbB2F…
EMF Hazards Summit April 11th-14th https://t.co/EVQLFE6CYE free and online. Landmark paper by the ICBE-EMF group https://t.co/VT0Hx5OVd7
@patrickbetdavid NONE! Scientific evidence invalidates health assumptions underlying the FCC and ICNIRP exposure limit determinations for radiofrequency radiation: implications for 5G https://t.co/2Lo7ASxMi6
@ThierryBreton @DigitalEU Resilience should not be achieved on the cost of environment and health of EU citizens?!?!? Belyaev et al. (2022). Scientific evidence invalidates health assumptions underlying the FCC and ICNIRP exposure limit determinations for radiofrequency radiation: Implications for 5G.
Implications for 5G: "In this paper, we show how the past 25 years of extensive research on RFR demonstrates that the assumptions underlying the FCC's and ICNIRP's exposure limits are invalid and continue to present a public health harm." #Stop5G https://t.co/rfZlU54ibC
https://t.co/fRiNOExhuB
@tveitmiljo Dette må kunne diskuteres. Nå er det tyst som graven. DEW -v¨pen fins og brukes. Chemtrails fins og brukes. Cloud-seeding fins og gjøres, værmodifikasjoner gjøres daglig og blir sett på som klimaforandringer.. Det er så mye, https://t.co/fRiNOExhuB
RT @Anti5GWarrior: Scientific evidence invalidates health assumptions underlying the FCC and ICNIRP exposure limit determinations for radio…
Scientific evidence invalidates health assumptions underlying the FCC and ICNIRP exposure limit determinations for radiofrequency radiation: implications for 5G https://t.co/rfZlU54ibC
Scientific evidence invalidates health assumptions underlying the FCC and ICNIRP exposure limit determinations for radiofrequency radiation: implications for 5G https://t.co/rfZlU54ibC
@CartlandDavid Scientific evidence invalidates #Health assumptions underlying the FCC & ICNIRP exposure limit determinations for radiofrequency radiation: implications for #5G. FCC's and ICNIRP's exposure limits are invalid & continue to present a public health harm https://t.co/rfZlU54ibC
@CorinneNokel Like for 'health' - "Scientific evidence invalidates health assumptions underlying the FCC and ICNIRP exposure limit determinations for radiofrequency radiation: implications for 5G" https://t.co/rfZlU54ibC
RT @saferphones: @frankdevocht @DavidWedege ICNIRP, IEEE &FCC limits r based on protection against overheating. Studies used to identify th…
@SunWeatherMan Scientific evidence invalidates health assumptions underlying the FCC and ICNIRP exposure limit determinations for radiofrequency radiation: implications for 5G https://t.co/vjAYz4wXAj
@markbland @Rightanglenews @elonmusk Well now we know that's horse manure - According to this publication we are being damaged. Scientific evidence invalidates health assumptions underlying the FCC and ICNIRP exposure limit determinations for radiofrequency radiation: implications for 5G https://t.co/vjAYz4wXAj
RT @saferphones: @janevandis Cell phone RF radiation is an environmental pollutant. We hold phones close to the body for hours a day. Curre…
RT @saferphones: @janevandis Cell phone RF radiation is an environmental pollutant. We hold phones close to the body for hours a day. Curre…
@janevandis Cell phone RF radiation is an environmental pollutant. We hold phones close to the body for hours a day. Current regulations do not protect from biological impacts of chronic exposure. https://t.co/b0D9XaU0IX
@frankdevocht @KFosterUPenn @GeoKabat No details just general sweeping statements? Let's get specific. So do you think the antiquated animal studies that show "behavioral disruption" at 4 W/kg are strong studies? statistically significant? After all they are the foundation for ICNIRP limits. https://t.co/b0D9XaU0IX
@Pasisillanp Periaatteessa kyllä. Sitä ennen vain pitäisi riskit hallita ja ottaa vastuuta. Nyt valitettavasti kyseenalaisilla keinoilla teollisuus koittaa välttää säätelyä ja joukkokanteita. Pari esimerkkiä: kuinka iso ongelma on jo olemassa ( https://t.co/Q0bcDhD3BB ) ja kuinka sitä
@jaywgooch @KFosterUPenn @jonathanstea International Commission on the Biological Effects of Electromagnetic Fields "Scientific evidence invalidates health assumptions underlying the FCC and ICNIRP exposure limit determinations for radiofrequency radiation: implications for 5G" https://t.co/b0D9XaU0IX
RT @MARKANTHONYST20: GOVERNMENT LIES PEOPLE DIES https://t.co/snEY4bE2Yz
RT @MARKANTHONYST20: GOVERNMENT LIES PEOPLE DIES https://t.co/snEY4bE2Yz
GOVERNMENT LIES PEOPLE DIES https://t.co/snEY4bE2Yz
RT @saferphones: @frankdevocht @DavidWedege ICNIRP, IEEE &FCC limits r based on protection against overheating. Studies used to identify th…
RT @saferphones: @frankdevocht @DavidWedege ICNIRP, IEEE &FCC limits r based on protection against overheating. Studies used to identify th…
RT @saferphones: @frankdevocht @DavidWedege ICNIRP, IEEE &FCC limits r based on protection against overheating. Studies used to identify th…
RT @saferphones: @frankdevocht @DavidWedege ICNIRP, IEEE &FCC limits r based on protection against overheating. Studies used to identify th…
@frankdevocht @DavidWedege ICNIRP, IEEE &FCC limits r based on protection against overheating. Studies used to identify the level are ancient (from the 70s & early 80s) in which animals (a few rats & monkeys) stopped pressing a lever for food at a certain temp. Talk about a joke. https://t.co/b0D9XaU0IX
@frankdevocht "Adverse effects observed at exposures below the assumed threshold SAR include non-thermal induction of reactive oxygen species, DNA damage, cardiomyopathy, carcinogenicity, sperm damage, and neurological effects..." https://t.co/b0D9XaU0IX
SCIENTIFIC EVIDENCE INVALIDATES HEALTH "ASSUMPTIONS" UNDERLYING FCC and ICNIRP EXPOSURE LIMIT DETERMINATIONS FOR RADIOFREQUENCY RADIATION https://t.co/xRiBHcf9fA #RFR #EMF #Cancer #heartattack #infertility #SmartMeter #FCC #ICNIRP https://t.co/cwb0TLoLRN
@DrSuneelDhand In addition to ultraprocessed food, it might be worth looking what chronic 24/7 exposure from pulsed microwaves does to human cells & metabolism. Recommend: https://t.co/r5pmX1BevW + https://t.co/6vWJIz1RuA + https://t.co/ir5EV3nGxe + https://t.co/Q0bcDhD3BB
2B/2 Op scholen worden mobieltjes nu geweerd. Ik weet dat elektromagnetische straling (als gevolg van een elektromagnetische kracht) slecht is voor de gezondheid. Sommige mensen zijn hiervoor zeer gevoelig. https://t.co/wGfTsRQGqL Vroeger was het zo goed, je gebruikte meerdere ..
@WSCCNews @griffitha Thorough "independent" safety studies & risk assessment? MP's & Councils and your families will also be affected by this there will be no hiding. Are you covered for the legal liability? https://t.co/iczSnzv3NW
@frankdevocht The research is already clear. Non thermal levels of wireless can cause harm. Safety is not assured. The majority of studies show harm. Time for action. Science not $cience. https://t.co/b0D9XaU0IX
@BedalCharlene @ERviewer https://t.co/q1OSXNegid
RT @berkeleyprc: Commission challenges wireless radiation safety limits; calls for moratorium on further rollout of 5G https://t.co/hwHbB2F…
Para evidencias sobre daños a la salud de tecnologías de telecomunicaciones y del 5G: https://t.co/K2e7dmyptw Como en el caso https://t.co/CoX1aWNGk8 #UACM #UNAM #IPN #UAM #CDMX #GDL #MTY #SLP #PUE #QRO @SSalud_mx @lopezobrador_ @rubengluengas @alvaro_delgado @julioastillero
@LozzaFox @LBC @SadiqKhan Worth measuring also microwave pollution in the tube (in wagons) . https://t.co/yQdNFnFxy9 One more reason to .... travel in a car (until they will provide healthier tube).
@frankdevocht @eQuiLIBERTY_uk The basis for ICNIRP limits is weak- that heat is the primary harm. ICNIRP is based on a handful of antiquated small animal studies- that found when they got to to hot they stopped seeking food. and exposures were under an hour. People would be shocked https://t.co/b0D9XaU0IX
@frankdevocht Will you be responding at all? I also suggest a hard look at the studies underpinning the heat is the only harm behavioral disruption threshold. Do they met the snuff test? RF for under an hour in small animals with a "colonic temperature" https://t.co/b0D9XaU0IX
#5g analisi puntuale sul perche' i limiti #icnrip sono obsoleti https://t.co/CXVyqvrWp5
@frankdevocht Science indicating non thermal effects from wireless radiation is clear. Children deserve to be protected as they will bear the brunt of irrelevant ICNIRP FCC limits. Hundreds of scientific papers support the existence of non thermal biological effects. https://t.co/b0D9XaU0IX
@frankdevocht The scientific evidence clearly demonstrates non thermal levels of RF from wireless communication signals can impact biology. This is just a fact. To say that heating is the only harm is outdated and no longer supported by science. https://t.co/b0D9XaU0IX
@Alberto_Zalba @EstoyAvisando Ya he hablado de esto y esquiváis al elefante que da gusto https://t.co/FsSjfQGI5G "La evidencia científica invalida las suposiciones de salud que subyacen a las determinaciones del límite de exposición de la FCC y la ICNIRP para la radiación de radiofrecuencia"
@ahosmikko @pihanurmi @hsfi Tutkimus: "Scientific evidence invalidates health assumptions underlying the FCC and ICNIRP exposure limit determinations for radiofrequency radiation: implications for 5G" https://t.co/nKcxUpRUjv #RF #EMF #radiofrequency #EMF #5G #6G #varovaisuusperiaate
@ElHuffPost Independientemente de teorías y chascarrillos sobre radiación electromagnética, lo que se hace es coger una verdad incompleta y hacerla pasar por un bulo... https://t.co/FsSjfQGag8 SÍ hay preocupación por los CEMs antropogénicos para TODOS los sistemas que implican ROS
@gonzoonews Independientemente de teorías y chascarrillos sobre radiación electromagnética, lo que se hace es coger una verdad incompleta y hacerla pasar por un bulo... https://t.co/FsSjfQGag8 SÍ hay preocupación por los CEMs antropogénicos para TODOS los sistemas que implican ROS
@20m Independientemente de teorías y chascarrillos sobre radiación electromagnética, lo que se hace es coger una verdad incompleta y hacerla pasar por un bulo... https://t.co/FsSjfQGag8 SÍ hay preocupación por los CEMs antropogénicos para TODOS los sistemas que implican ROS
@astro_duque Independientemente de teorías y chascarrillos sobre radiación electromagnética, lo que haces es coger una verdad incompleta y hacerla pasar por un bulo... https://t.co/FsSjfQGag8 SÍ hay preocupación por los CEMs antropogénicos para TODOS los sistemas que implican ROS
The below scientific review goes into DETAIL with 300+ references about why all these assumptions (and more) are completely unjustified to make. I will summarize the highlights for you... https://t.co/mFG8B2CBn5
@TLevamo @pelastakaalapse Lapsenoikeuksiin ja nuorten kasvaviin mielenterveysongelmiin liittyen, onko Tiina-Maria ja Sonja lasten aivojen lähes eksponentiaalisesti kasvanut mikroaaltokuormitus tullut esille tiimissänne tai areenalla? Kurkatkaapa: https://t.co/Q0bcDhD3BB , sivu 4, Neurological effects.
@ims43 @joninaction @buccocapital @clearvibescat https://t.co/qjTKarfREu
Correct. Scientific evidence invalidates health assumptions underlying the FCC and ICNIRP exposure limit determinations for radiofrequency radiation: implications for 5G https://t.co/PojFWPDbYZ #OperationWarpSpeed #BigPharma #FDA #CDC parallels #BIGTECH #FCC! https://t.co/fvg41dYXBW
@GerberKawasaki https://t.co/yVW6q1pJ5z
@thebadstats @NutritionMadeS3 i see u liked this tweet. I trust u. Can u comment on this? https://t.co/XWy7zsgA0y
@foeeurope @bund_net @amisdelaterre @AmigosTierraEsp @HnutiDUHA @FoEMalta @GreenpeaceEU @Green_Europe @BirdLifeEurope @ECVC1 @BeesEci I wonder when you will consider combined effect of RF with chemicals? Possible effects: A) disrupts orientation/eering to hive B) damages fertility C) interferes communication of bees . A document to look about mechanisms: https://t.co/yQdNFnFxy9 and then specific: https://t.co/26E31QcgIQ
@DrMariaNeira Indeed. Further: Massive MW-pollution makes chemical pollution in New York even worse. New guidelines would be needed. There is a nice article in the latest IEEE MW Magazine, PIC + https://t.co/zDUSzyhbcn . Mechanism-related information: https://t.co/yQdNFnFxy9 . From / In New https://t.co/HmKZOv55Z2
@ChrisPalmerMD How would you Dr. Palmer consider RF-caused metabolism-related problems in stomach/gut + detrimental effect on mitochondrion in cells? For background: A Mechanism paper: https://t.co/Q0bcDhD3BB and another paper listing older occupational research about mental health:
@Mentor1Universa @amvtw @Manolotabaiba1 @PComentator @irma_vg @glopllu69 @Jorge06266221 @Samuel13004969 @LekLaial @DanielEcidi @Luis13104072 @GPlandemiun @No_se_alquila @romsanra @SUgayos @Joelkorean @Mirambella @84DiegoQM @aliciacgviolin @CarlosVecino4 @sirkioso @adolfCP @jon_tr1ste @Paula13vega @Hondontown @miacat47 @BorregoUnadeca @LeilaYLab @CafeyGrafeno @ashgam666 @jesus_colega_ @SdeSanty @ElRecogelatas @Anorcr1 @AI2BO4 @TwitterEspana Aquí no dicen eso https://t.co/FsSjfQGag8
Scientific evidence invalidates health assumptions underlying the FCC and ICNIRP exposure limit determinations for radiofrequency radiation: implications for 5G. https://t.co/b0D9XaU0IX https://t.co/pX1IhuH5MH
RT @Alzhacker: 高周波放射のFCCおよびICNIRPによる曝露限度決定の基礎となる健康上の仮定を無効とする科学的証拠：5Gへの影響 https://t.co/GyD5Knrjh6 誤った仮定に基づくこれらの暴露制限は、労働者、子供、過敏症患者、および一般人口を短期…
@pan_Demonium04 @Celesta91883911 Θεωρώ ότι η έκθεση είτε μέρους είτε του συνόλου του δέρματος, του μεγαλύτερου οργάνου του σώματος, στις εν λόγω ακτινοβολία και στα πολλαπλά πεδία δρα πολύ περισσότερο αθροιστικά σε βάθος χρόνου από ότι παραδέχονται οι μελέτες. —> https://t.co/HdgolbGoyk
@frankdevocht @MartinRoosli @DaniVienneau @SwissTPH @zoranajova @LouisSlesin @blogBRHP Please stop name calling. In light of the large body of evidence on bio-effects, it is prudent & sensible to reduce public exposure & to enact policies to protect children & vulnerable populations. ICNIRP is based on outdated and proven wrong assumptions https://t.co/b0D9XaU0IX
RT @saferphones: "Adverse effects observed at exposures below the assumed threshold SAR include non-thermal induction of reactive oxygen sp…
'Scientific evidence invalidates health assumptions underlying the FCC and ICNIRP exposure limit determinations for radiofrequency radiation: implications for 5G' https://t.co/sbD9XWcuWM
@ABridgen @JohnBoweActor Congrats and heartfelt thanks. And once that's sorted... 'Scientific evidence invalidates health assumptions underlying the FCC and ICNIRP exposure limit determinations for radiofrequency radiation: implications for 5G' https://t.co/BC7PPjSyOU
@rustyrockets @UniofReading @ElgivaTheatre @wycombeswan Truth/health lovers and followers of science not $cience: 'Scientific evidence invalidates health assumptions underlying the FCC and ICNIRP exposure limit determinations for radiofrequency radiation: implications for 5G' https://t.co/BC7PPjSyOU
@ABridgen @YouTube And whilst we're on the subject of cover-ups of real science: 'Scientific evidence invalidates health assumptions underlying the FCC and ICNIRP exposure limit determinations for radiofrequency radiation: implications for 5G' https://t.co/BC7PPjSyOU
@SteveBarclay FOLLOW THE SCIENCE 'Scientific evidence invalidates health assumptions underlying the FCC and ICNIRP exposure limit determinations for radiofrequency radiation: implications for 5G' https://t.co/BC7PPjSyOU
'Scientific evidence invalidates health assumptions underlying the FCC and ICNIRP exposure limit determinations for radiofrequency radiation: implications for 5G' https://t.co/BC7PPjSyOU
@frankdevocht @KFosterUPenn @dave_ehs @MartinRoosli @blogBRHP @LouisSlesin @MicrowaveNews Constant attacks on scientists, published research, reports etc.. who are calling for #RF radiation limits that adress biological effects is telling. Unfounded & unfactual criticisms all go back to "doubt is their product" messages of industry tied groups https://t.co/b0D9XaU0IX
@ThomasResen @claushetting Om stråling. https://t.co/RXYE5AFdXa
RT @saferphones: "Adverse effects observed at exposures below the assumed threshold SAR include non-thermal induction of reactive oxygen sp…
@KFosterUPenn @LouisSlesin @frankdevocht @blogBRHP @MartinRoosli @MicrowaveNews The research is adequate to conclude that safety is not assured AND that adverse biological effects can occur at levels below ICNIRP/FCC limits. https://t.co/b0D9XaU0IX
"Adverse effects observed at exposures below the assumed threshold SAR include non-thermal induction of reactive oxygen species, DNA damage, cardiomyopathy, carcinogenicity, sperm damage, and neurological effects, incl. electromagnetic hypersensitivity." https://t.co/b0D9XaU0IX https://t.co/M16gcldNgN
@LMedievo @EstoyAvisando Pero es que esos temas los sacáis vosotrxs. Yo pretendo hablar de esto https://t.co/pA60oPNGsj Captura 1 https://t.co/Fe5iQgrDni Captura 2 https://t.co/HqkJL8Qc7l Captura 3 https://t.co/FsSjfQGag8 Captura 4 Lo demás es solo coyuntural. https://t.co/6PaoMmZ6b3
@MrSmithee80 @EstoyAvisando Esto también me preocupa https://t.co/FsSjfQGag8
https://t.co/iD7kXcULcY
RT @Linaguasca: https://t.co/f0Whj0PB1I
https://t.co/f0Whj0PB1I
@weezmgk @DoctorKarl Scientific evidence invalidates health assumptions underlying the FCC and ICNIRP exposure limit determinations for radiofrequency radiation: implications for 5G
@weezmgk @DoctorKarl https://t.co/7bQNFFseOY
@FamedCelebrity https://t.co/6qXlsCPJwj Can US Navy research be trusted at all? nb: "NCRPdocument[6] acknowledges that exposures could be greater than the recommended safety limit values when people are in close proximity to emitters of RFR. Towers erected @ less than 200m dwelling proximity?
RT @keisuke4713: 高周波放射に曝露制限の決定根底の健康に関する仮定が無効化: 5G影響 https://t.co/Dz7vGGL251 前立腺腫瘍・過形成:副腎腫瘍⬆️3W/kg群全臓器で良性・悪性腫瘍⬆️ 心筋症 GSM曝露雌
@naturvardsverk RF-belastning har påverkan till insekternas orienteeringsförmåga, fertilitet & oksidativ stress: https://t.co/zVgpxdJliQ + https://t.co/OgY3jvzDBX + https://t.co/jWRsKvAxYg + https://t.co/01DpXpi24W Om mekanismer: https://t.co/VViG0lBsx9 . Mot hälsosammare miljön? https://t.co/NkjnEqoHtc
Scientific evidence invalidates health assumptions underlying the FCC and ICNIRP exposure limit determinations for radiofrequency radiation: implications for 5G - https://t.co/lfp6EfFdKC
International Commission on the Biological Effects of Electromagnetic Fields (ICBE-EMF implications for 5G https://t.co/Wo8EWbDq2E
Stay Tuned for My Upcoming Zine Release on Microwave Radiation! Check out the facts and Get Protected! https://t.co/DsRKFvzZ3l
RT @ahosmikko: @UNEP @UN Why has the UN totally forgotten one critical environmental factor? https://t.co/8EmDuKghyR , https://t.co/yp5xW…
@UNEP @UN Why has the UN totally forgotten one critical environmental factor? https://t.co/8EmDuKghyR , https://t.co/yp5xWnzhCQ , https://t.co/jWRsKvAxYg , https://t.co/QKfA4dniiG . Mechanisms of harm: https://t.co/Q0bcDhD3BB
Resulta que los límites de exposición a radiofrecuencias para proteccion de la salud no eran seguros. Habrá que actuar con precaución hasta tanto haya nuevos estudios. Ojo al 5G. https://t.co/aq2FysTAJO
@MrDanielBuck What might be behind this behaviour? Partly ... neurological effects and Chronic exposure of Central Nervous System and Brain? The following research paper describes this mechanism: https://t.co/VViG0lBsx9
@hansriemer @POTUS cell towers are not safe https://t.co/n6NUif0BKc
@hansriemer @MoCo360Media Why did you green light the cell tower law in Montgomery County? https://t.co/n6NUif0BKc
https://t.co/yTj3sVxJNV
@Saaahiillll https://t.co/RWHJbPdFD0
RT @WirelessLabRat: “Scientific evidence invalidates health assumptions underlying the FCC and ICNIRP exposure limit determinations for rad…
RT @WirelessLabRat: “Scientific evidence invalidates health assumptions underlying the FCC and ICNIRP exposure limit determinations for rad…
“Scientific evidence invalidates health assumptions underlying the FCC and ICNIRP exposure limit determinations for radiofrequency radiation: implications for 5G”: International Commission on the Biological Effects of Electromagnetic Fields (ICBE-EMF): https://t.co/al9O9urfFw
Scientific evidence invalidates health assumptions underlying the FCC and ICNIRP exposure limit determinations for radiofrequency radiation: implications for 5G https://t.co/xjdNlVSYMi
@pau_llaves Sí, una sociedad desinformada de las consecuencias de los ecocidios, pero no igual de desinformada. A una parte se le dice que tiene ecoansiedad plenamente consciente porque los vertidos, pero a otra se le dice que tiene paranoia negacionista porque 5G. https://t.co/yMj5WtSCPJ
RT @Alzhacker: 訳 https://t.co/ch7lwjjQLz
RT @Alzhacker: 訳 https://t.co/ch7lwjjQLz
RT @Alzhacker: 訳 https://t.co/ch7lwjjQLz
RT @Alzhacker: 訳 https://t.co/ch7lwjjQLz
訳 https://t.co/ch7lwjjQLz
@EstoyAvisando Leed insensatos https://t.co/yMj5WtB1r9
RT @Alzhacker: 高周波放射のFCCおよびICNIRPによる曝露限度決定の基礎となる健康上の仮定を無効とする科学的証拠：5Gへの影響 https://t.co/GyD5Knrjh6 誤った仮定に基づくこれらの暴露制限は、労働者、子供、過敏症患者、および一般人口を短期…
RT @Alzhacker: 高周波放射のFCCおよびICNIRPによる曝露限度決定の基礎となる健康上の仮定を無効とする科学的証拠：5Gへの影響 https://t.co/GyD5Knrjh6 誤った仮定に基づくこれらの暴露制限は、労働者、子供、過敏症患者、および一般人口を短期…
RT @Alzhacker: 高周波放射のFCCおよびICNIRPによる曝露限度決定の基礎となる健康上の仮定を無効とする科学的証拠：5Gへの影響 https://t.co/GyD5Knrjh6 誤った仮定に基づくこれらの暴露制限は、労働者、子供、過敏症患者、および一般人口を短期…
RT @Alzhacker: 高周波放射のFCCおよびICNIRPによる曝露限度決定の基礎となる健康上の仮定を無効とする科学的証拠：5Gへの影響 https://t.co/GyD5Knrjh6 誤った仮定に基づくこれらの暴露制限は、労働者、子供、過敏症患者、および一般人口を短期…
RT @Alzhacker: 高周波放射のFCCおよびICNIRPによる曝露限度決定の基礎となる健康上の仮定を無効とする科学的証拠：5Gへの影響 https://t.co/GyD5Knrjh6 誤った仮定に基づくこれらの暴露制限は、労働者、子供、過敏症患者、および一般人口を短期…
RT @Alzhacker: 高周波放射のFCCおよびICNIRPによる曝露限度決定の基礎となる健康上の仮定を無効とする科学的証拠：5Gへの影響 https://t.co/GyD5Knrjh6 誤った仮定に基づくこれらの暴露制限は、労働者、子供、過敏症患者、および一般人口を短期…
RT @Alzhacker: 高周波放射のFCCおよびICNIRPによる曝露限度決定の基礎となる健康上の仮定を無効とする科学的証拠：5Gへの影響 https://t.co/GyD5Knrjh6 誤った仮定に基づくこれらの暴露制限は、労働者、子供、過敏症患者、および一般人口を短期…
高周波放射のFCCおよびICNIRPによる曝露限度決定の基礎となる健康上の仮定を無効とする科学的証拠：5Gへの影響 https://t.co/GyD5Knrjh6 誤った仮定に基づくこれらの暴露制限は、労働者、子供、過敏症患者、および一般人口を短期または長期のRFR暴露から適切に保護することはできない。
#stop5G and #wireless expansion #CTSitingCounsel #PURA Scientific evidence invalidates health assumptions underlying the FCC and ICNIRP exposure limit determinations for … https://t.co/FPMehIFKfK
Scientific evidence invalidates health assumptions underlying the FCC and ICNIRP exposure limit determinations for radiofrequency radiation: implications for 5G https://t.co/lfp6EfFLAa
Scientific evidence invalidates health assumptions underlying the FCC and ICNIRP exposure limit determinations for radiofrequency radiation: implications for 5G https://t.co/1usuqmgKWn
@astrophysically @propublica Scientific evidence invalidates health assumptions underlying the FCC and ICNIRP exposure limit determinations for radiofrequency radiation: implications for 5G https://t.co/b0D9XaU0IX
⚠️Important new peer-reviewed paper published 10/31: "Scientific evidence invalidates health assumptions underlying the FCC and ICNIRP exposure limit determinations for radiofrequency radiation: implications for 5G" https://t.co/k9lqYuhUW1 https://t.co/IwHGyigT1d
RT @PreventCancerNw: "Scientific evidence invalidates health assumptions underlying the FCC and ICNIRP exposure limit determinations for ra…
RT @PreventCancerNw: "Scientific evidence invalidates health assumptions underlying the FCC and ICNIRP exposure limit determinations for ra…
Link to the Paper: "Scientific evidence invalidates health assumptions underlying the FCC and ICNIRP exposure limit determinations for radiofrequency radiation: implications for 5G" https://t.co/k9lqYuhn6t
RT @PreventCancerNw: "Scientific evidence invalidates health assumptions underlying the FCC and ICNIRP exposure limit determinations for ra…
Tell #MoCo repeal cell tower legislation—Effects are harmful to residents--Read New Paper—“Scientific evidence invalidates health assumptions underlying the FCC and ICNIRP exposure limit determinations for radiofrequency radiation: implications for 5G” & heed call for moratorium https://t.co/fnNVCgvcgy
"Scientific evidence invalidates health assumptions underlying the FCC and ICNIRP exposure limit determinations for radiofrequency radiation: implications for 5G" #EnvironmentalHealth #RFR #5G #Exposures https://t.co/bWpFG3Yq1e
RT @The5Gfacts: New paper: Scientific evidence invalidates health assumptions underlying the FCC and ICNIRP exposure limit determinations f…
RT @The5Gfacts: New paper: Scientific evidence invalidates health assumptions underlying the FCC and ICNIRP exposure limit determinations f…
New paper: Scientific evidence invalidates health assumptions underlying the FCC and ICNIRP exposure limit determinations for radiofrequency radiation: implications for 5G. Here is a video to explain the findings in the paper: https://t.co/pAGTmYX7bG #5GNews
Scientific evidence invalidates health assumptions underlying the FCC and ICNIRP exposure limit determinations for radiofrequency radiation: implications for 5G | Environmental Health | Full Text https://t.co/RwsfCnuUm6
Scientific evidence invalidates health assumptions underlying the FCC and ICNIRP exposure limit determinations for radiofrequency radiation: implications for 5G https://t.co/G0F8vBodHe https://t.co/NNomYSHej7
Scientific evidence invalidates health assumptions underlying the FCC and ICNIRP exposure limit determinations for radiofrequency radiation: implications for 5G https://t.co/GzfPlzoAx6
RT @Kaushal01833606: Scientific evidence invalidates health assumptions underlying the FCC and ICNIRP exposure limit determinations for rad…
Scientific evidence invalidates health assumptions underlying the FCC and ICNIRP exposure limit determinations for radiofrequency radiation: implications for 5G https://t.co/gvzS5chTVs https://t.co/W95EDdEvZs
deserves a reading Scientific evidence invalidates health assumptions underlying the FCC and ICNIRP exposure limit determinations for radiofrequency radiation: implications for 5G https://t.co/O7Br4DeDWU .
Scientific evidence invalidates health assumptions underlying the FCC and ICNIRP exposure limit determinations for radiofrequency radiation: implications for 5G | Environmental Health | Full Text https://t.co/AVh3e9KM8k
This video presentation summarizes key points from paper “Scientific evidence invalidates health assumptions underlying the FCC and ICNIRP exposure limit determinations for radiofrequency radiation: implications for 5G,” Oct 18 Journal Environmental Health. Stop #MoCo ZTA 22-01 https://t.co/dgVDeZEQbs
RT @Kaushal01833606: Scientific evidence invalidates health assumptions underlying the FCC and ICNIRP exposure limit determinations for rad…
Well Being: Dangers of 5G “Scientific evidence invalidates health assumptions underlying the FCC and ICNIRP exposure limit determinations for radiofrequency radiation: implications for 5G,”https://t.co/19G4bWDFPL
RT @Kaushal01833606: Scientific evidence invalidates health assumptions underlying the FCC and ICNIRP exposure limit determinations for rad…
Scientific evidence invalidates health assumptions underlying the FCC and ICNIRP exposure limit determinations for radiofrequency radiation. Dangers of 5G on public health is far > than the benefits, yet #wef #who & their puppet govt risking lives of all living being on earth. https://t.co/V65EXJY3zE
1) Scientific evidence invalidates health assumptions underlying the FCC and ICNIRP exposure limit determinations for radiofrequency radiation: implications for 5G International Commission on the Biological Effects of Electromagnetic Fields (ICBE-EMF)*
Scientific evidence invalidates health assumptions underlying the FCC and ICNIRP exposure limit determinations for radiofrequency radiation: implications for #Stop5G and all WIFi. https://t.co/69tp0q2jqU
Scientific evidence invalidates health assumptions underlying the FCC and ICNIRP exposure limit determinations for radiofrequency radiation: implications for 5G https://t.co/OpKMnqKEMa
F
A
ET
PN
L
MM
JL
WW
VA
DM
G
CS
WS
Fİ
DS
BE
MA
A
S
AP
CP
F
A
AT
G
D
EU
AP
MT
AA
TL
T
EC
S
BC
AK
CH
RS
NA
EE
TB
LM
AW
O
SI
A
MN
MS
EM
RW
ET
JM
SD
MZ
MP
RC
UU
C
TS
AA
J
JW
E
TD
V
EI
AA
MM
UR
N
B
EM
L
な
DP
L
C
A
JN
RC
KS
CS
MM
E
お
霞
苫
E
教
S
く
L
T
TI
MR
TG
SG
KH
JK
KS
NR
JJ
LA
AH
S
VK
SS
M