Mentions
Extended reach
Total likes
Video views
AI synopsis
Numerous posts highlight specific projections made by Exxon, with phrases like 'Exxon knew' and 'impressive accuracy' frequently mentioned to emphasize disbelief that such claims were downplayed. The tone across the discussions reflects a blend of outrage and a sense of urgency about holding corporations accountable for misleading the public, evidenced by terms like 'corporate shill' and 'propaganda,' showcasing the emotional weight tied to the article's implications.
Many discussions reflect support for the findings and correctness of Exxon's projections, albeit with frustration over their lack of transparency.
Users show a high level of curiosity about the implications and details of the research.
While many posts engage with the article's findings, some are shallow in their analysis, focusing instead on expressing anger towards Exxon.
There is a strong perception that the findings will significantly influence public understanding and corporate accountability in climate science.
@hraba_z Člověk má dvě možnosti: věřit bludům středočeského lokálního politika nulového významu nebo datům a pozorování špičkových vědců. Šamanovi nebo medicíně založené na důkazech. Je na každém z nás, co si vybereme. https://t.co/ROlx63EKxz
"The company that will become Exxon bragging about supplying enough energy to melt 7 million tons of glacier every day. Circa 1970s" (from altext) & @naomioreskes.bsky.social et al 2023 paper "Assessing ExxonMobil’s global warming projections" www.science.org/doi/10.1126/... #STS #histsci
Oil companies told the public there was serious uncertainty about climate science. But their internal research from the 1970s showed the opposite, and has been pretty accurate: Assessing ExxonMobil’s global warming projections https://t.co/7XY9m48PnE
EXXON wußte nicht! In einer peer-reviewed Arbeit https://t.co/C3AQqehC3D behaupten #Rahmstorf et al, dass #Exxon zu Beginn der 80er Jahre wußte, dass durch CO2 das Klima verändert wird. Pat. #Frank, Ph.D., Chemiker an der Stanford Uni, Cal., widerlegt diese Aussage und zeigt https://t.co/5iA48UllD6
Exxon knew about the consequences of fossil energy sources since 1977. Instead of living up to their responsibility, a huge worldwide climate denier network was built up. 'Assessing ExxonMobil’s global warming projections' www.science.org/doi/10.1126/...
@SecretaryWright @elonmusk, hey here is your buddy wasting taxpayer $ on settled science. “Our analysis shows that since the late 1970s and early 1980s, ExxonMobil scientists (i) accurately projected and skillfully modeled global warming due to fossil fuel burning.” https://t.co/sSUiwoRyjj
ExxonMobil's own research revealed the impact of CO2 emissions on the planet decades ago. A study from Harvard and the Potsdam Institute shows that their projections were as accurate as independent models. Despite this…
Hi everyone, welcome to our channel. We discuss how psychological insights can illuminate the climate crisis. Our analysis covers key findings, including how reducing psychological distance and engaging emotions can…
This video assesses ExxonMobil's climate projections from 1977 to 2003, revealing that many forecasts matched later observations. Although their predictions were scientifically accurate, ExxonMobil often contradicted…
@RobyChil @LorisGroppo Per approfondire sui modelli: https://t.co/EDVbOdEk5Z https://t.co/7S1jUv8Y7H
@Chr15V @mrwriter86 @BGatesIsaPyscho You can read the facts if you are willing to do so. https://t.co/jjRF8Zs61i
@catturd2 Really? Exxon knew... https://t.co/8wPpJOc4XB
1/9
@ChrisMartzWX Exxon knew.... https://t.co/8wPpJOc4XB
@MurrayNye25768 https://t.co/0BJvFolHG5
https://t.co/0BJvFolHG5
https://t.co/0BJvFolHG5
https://t.co/0BJvFolHG5
https://t.co/0BJvFolHG5
@WeiZhangAtmos @curryja Because models actually work. Stay mad.
RT @JaraEfko: @hraba_z Člověk má dvě možnosti: věřit bludům středočeského lokálního politika nulového významu nebo datům a pozorování špičk…
@PiotrRaszkowski @Stysz @Love_Subaru1 Dziwne, że się nie odniosłeś do tego ⬇️ https://t.co/Lx5OVIcQIw
RT @JaraEfko: @hraba_z Člověk má dvě možnosti: věřit bludům středočeského lokálního politika nulového významu nebo datům a pozorování špičk…
RT @JaraEfko: @hraba_z Člověk má dvě možnosti: věřit bludům středočeského lokálního politika nulového významu nebo datům a pozorování špičk…
@hraba_z Člověk má dvě možnosti: věřit bludům středočeského lokálního politika nulového významu nebo datům a pozorování špičkových vědců. Šamanovi nebo medicíně založené na důkazech. Je na každém z nás, co si vybereme. https://t.co/ROlx63EKxz
@ThomasSowell Tedious fossil fuel industry propaganda. The only reason AGW is denied is to protect fossil fuel industry profits. https://t.co/mgb5zbHZWX https://t.co/pVCpT0L5kb
@Kman_Michigan @MorePerfectUS Exxon knew about climate change: https://t.co/t75w2NzkXS In the 1980s: https://t.co/wArYMuPHiE Which means you're either a corporate shill or an imbecile. Which is it?
@panciosuperstar Pogoda to co inngo
@MurrayNye25768 @CO2Coalition Fossil fuel companies knew. "we find that 63 to 83% of the climate projections reported by ExxonMobil scientists were accurate in predicting subsequent global warming." https://t.co/mgb5zbHZWX
@HackY0urReality @DevanaUkraine Of course its paranoia, mixed with ideological delusion. You ignore 100 years of documented and 50 years of predicted climate change. Even Exxon knew in the 1970ies that climate change was coming. That has nothing do do with the UN. https://t.co/JACoVoN1pV
@CieMorintouch @SergeZaka Ha bon ? C'est drôle mais des scientifiques au sein d'Exxon ont fait des études en interne sur les activités de l'entreprise fin année 70... bien avant la création du GIEC. Et devine quoi, les courbes sont édifiantes : https://t.co/rrgDxnptKs
RT @AtomsksSanakan: @pmagn @JimBowersclimb @hausfath The Paris Agreement used CMIP5, which was as accurate as prior modeling. CMIP6 is the…
@Marco777Polo @hausfath Because the graph is based on a paper that focused on projections from academic publications: https://t.co/2gSKZrvlE8 If you want graphs for projections from the fossil fuel industry, then see the following (through 2019): https://t.co/dF5RZoAWGK https://t.co/Zi8zgD7sEg
@pmagn @JimBowersclimb @hausfath The Paris Agreement used CMIP5, which was as accurate as prior modeling. CMIP6 is the real issue, since its implied TCR is higher than prior modeling. https://t.co/5S97IWtPaf https://t.co/2gSKZruNOA https://t.co/SILqcy8ZBj https://t.co/dF5RZoAoRc https://t.co/zaQIY3NwSl https://t.co/iLNVwiaxNH
@JunkScience Global warming denial is just a fossil fuel industry scam. We all know this. https://t.co/mgb5zbHs7p https://t.co/p71EC9tj7A
@d_r_a_z_i_l @borghi_claudio Tieni, questi sono i tuoi amici: https://t.co/EDVbOdEk5Z
@RossiMario4229 @fsutto @Walii_Hs @ing_xxxxxx @borghi_claudio @grok Beh, manabe con le sue “previsioni” ha vinto il Nobel per la fisica, il resto lo ha fatto Hasselmann. Però le mie previsioni preferite rimangono quelle di exxon mobill: https://t.co/EDVbOdERVx Per i dati: https://t.co/3wk842ovy9 Serve altro? ☺️
RT @JsoTony: Great initiative but it’s all so avoidable, the fossil fuel industry knew from the 1950’s that their products were harmful.…
Great initiative but it’s all so avoidable, the fossil fuel industry knew from the 1950’s that their products were harmful. Greed will kill everyone eventually. https://t.co/oGGUShfQ3Z. https://t.co/eg6KmYTdaj
@PeterDClack @FreyaZuri @Dallas62130926 Well that isnt what Exxon scientists were thinking in the 1970s. Their predictions turned out to be amazingly good. https://t.co/HN9KzoUlUg And indeed Exxon agrees now. https://t.co/Lp0woHHGDZ
@feelsdesperate The oil industry has known its a very serious problem for decades That's why they themselves have stated that they are now in the business of creating doubt https://t.co/3LYZWWxh94
@Mariano_zcz @bderski Zgadzam się, ludzie mają krótką pamięć. Ale na szczęście trzymamy dane archiwalne by się z nich uczyć. Tak jak naukowcy Exxona przewidywali poziomy CO2 i temperatury w latach 70-tych, tak idziemy tą ścieżką: https://t.co/WLwuXN8xum
@jemmm85517813 @ClaireCoutinho CO2 is the main driver of recent increases in temps as projected by Exxon Mobil back in 1982 - they predicted future demand for fossil fuels, increased CO2 and associated impact on temps. Difficult to have been so accurate if CO2 has no effect on climate: https://t.co/J4T7uOvOhb
@harrisp72 @bigkiitten https://t.co/iZ4M6zrs5Y https://t.co/LOZdIjyRgu
@jbf789 @MatthewWielicki No they aren’t. https://t.co/K5IrG00Eaz
@skonfundowanhuj Zadania jak zwykle są podzielone
@ChrisMartzWX The red-team-versus-blue-team nonsense is the classic appeal to meretricious balance made by those seeking to obfuscate the clarity of science that has, for a long time, been apparent to all, even Exxon. https://t.co/K5IrG00Eaz
Sentiment for this on Twitter is almost unanimously positive, but check out the negative sentiment found here; notice that it's supportive of the research, but negative in tone. You can identify combative allies using sentiment analysis. It is worth knowing who is fighting for science.
Here's a striking example in climate change research. In 2023, Naomi Oreskes, who wrote Merchants of Doubt (that turned into a great film) published "Assessing ExxonMobil's Global Warming Projections". You can find the original article here #ClimateSky www.science.org/doi/epdf/10....
@paddysaidingbar @CCross1776 @Royalacresrod @peblackstock @Gilles_Borghese @KellMorrHK @OscarsWild1 @kennetham12 @Fossil_Herb @BobPartridge16 @benmooreau @Konrad_Chapman @craigthomler @Milei_InEnglish @M3othra012 @nalonjack @ScienceBlog3 @smeemartin @MichaelCastill2 @WeRone777 @insane_voice Exxon had climate models that were made public.This is solid evidence. https://t.co/h0YoBbHFyt
@tom_wheeling @adlrope @MatthewWielicki Even Exxon’s scientists predicted global warming via AGW modeling with impressive accuracy decades ago. https://t.co/M6wHhuxsl5 And seriously, I asked you to tell us "What is a woman?" before you asked me, sport. You won't answer either, because you're just here to troll.
@marcfriedrich7 https://t.co/8wPpJOc4XB
@solarpapst Über Klima-Wissenschaftler sollte man nicht lästern. Weil man so seine Unwissenheit zeigt. Weil: die Erdöl Industrie intern zu denselben Prognosen gekommen ist! https://t.co/8wPpJOc4XB
@FraukePetry Sind Sie sicher....? https://t.co/8wPpJOc4XB
@jakubwiech Najlepsze jest to, że faktycznie były badania, które były ukrywane bo były niewygodne dla potężnych korporacji. https://t.co/zTbADaHvvG
@Gabriel02255244 https://t.co/CdGXz3OxCu.
@StefanoSdenegri @LaBombetta76 @FrancescoTsla @LeonardoPanetta Grossomodo il 100%, e su sta cosa c’è praticamente l’unanimità da decenni. Già negli anni ‘70 exxon parlava di che impatto avrebbero avuto i loro prodotti sul clima. E avevano ragione da vendere. https://t.co/EDVbOdEk5Z
Jeżeli sprawdził się ten ➡️ model "Wewnętrznie raportowany wykres z 1977 r. przedstawiający „efekt CO2" to dlaczego miałby się nie sprawdzić ten ⬇️
@Piotr_u55 Masz Piotrze, podyskutuj z tym
@bbbaldie @ChrisGloninger @MatthewWielicki As for CO2-driven global warming predictions, again even Exxon's scientists predicted global warming with an impressive degree of accuracy decades ago - 1982 to be exact. https://t.co/M6wHhuxsl5
@ExxonMobil_FRA @TotalEnergies @Shell ont instrumentalisé l’incertitude et financé le climatoscepticisme Charbon, pétrole, gaz .. les combustibles fossiles sont responsables à 75 % des émissions de gaz à effet de serre qui réchauffe notre planète #canicule https://t.co/11ml5YbT9X
@HinrichHan43736 @i_am_fabs Industrie wusste es: Exxon-Modelle prognostizierten die Erwärmung seit den 70ern ziemlich genau. Öffentlich gab’s mit dreckigen Millionen finanzierte Zweifel-PR. https://t.co/imI9HUEpoP
@SunTzuNorth @JasonPYYC Exxon Mobil sure seems to have thought it was real since at least 1977. They seem to have predicted it incredibly well too. https://t.co/SGytI44lxz https://t.co/YUHhhQk01s
@themensclubcoin @LacieInBloom @redsnoopy69 Tell Exxon that. https://t.co/hzpq6obQF2
@DonTheFurious1 @JasonPYYC Exxon’s studies from decades ago had the exact opposite effect. They’ve done everything possible to squash what they predicted themselves so their profits wouldn’t be impacted. https://t.co/hzpq6obiPu
@red_standing @simonmaechling Even Exxon’s scientists predicted current global warming with impressive accuracy decades ago. https://t.co/M6wHhuxsl5
@oloughlj Would you like... more of them? https://t.co/tSqDAHlE87 https://t.co/WAUvhWHeLp https://t.co/c4l8kLpLQC https://t.co/WyYD7BBq9D https://t.co/RNB7sU06ih https://t.co/IKJGivB0Wz Any of those will do, sport.
@RCowley185R @mesoepi @John_On_Climate @PeterDClack @NOAA Even Exxon’s scientists predicted global warming via AGW modeling with impressive accuracy decades ago. https://t.co/M6wHhuxsl5
@EhmTEhf @MelissaLMRogers If you think it’s all fake, explain why ExxonMobil’s internal models predicted temperature rises better than NASA: https://t.co/nuZNO6cwz6
@Kenneth19567057 @ejwwest @25_cycle @JimBowersclimb @TimAllmanWriter Who were the"political masters" of the Exxon scientists who made their own independent predictions of global warming? Maybe oil companies don't fund climate science because they have learned their lesson. Safer to fund activists instead. https://t.co/ecqVr2tyBZ
@aaronshem @JVinos_Climate @BenBos1302 @paws101 Here’s the entire review your figures come from, to appt context: https://t.co/4BGdQinrb8
@ChrisMartzWX Get a load of these cranks predictions. They were such fear mongering libs they spent billions trying to NOT convince you. https://t.co/hzpq6obiPu
@TheTweetDawg @Dallas62130926 @RogerCoppock Meanwhile back on planet earth, even Exxon’s scientists predicted global warming via AGW modeling with impressive accuracy decades ago. https://t.co/M6wHhuxsl5
RT @TrackOilPACs: @SecretaryWright @elonmusk, hey here is your buddy wasting taxpayer $ on settled science. “Our analysis shows that sinc…
@SecretaryWright @elonmusk, hey here is your buddy wasting taxpayer $ on settled science. “Our analysis shows that since the late 1970s and early 1980s, ExxonMobil scientists (i) accurately projected and skillfully modeled global warming due to fossil fuel burning.” https://t.co/sSUiwoRyjj
@SSolemed @AndreasBrandt17 @Deu_Kurier Lese mal lieber die ExxonMobil Studien von 1972
@embonaccorso @FM_Ziggy Toh tieni, questo è il modello di Exxon Mobill, vai a battere cassa magari un bicchiere di benzina te lo regalano. https://t.co/EDVbOdERVx
RT @icarus62: @PeterDClack Industries have known for many decades in private, but denied in public, that fossil fuel combustion would cause…
RT @EnlightenStS: @systemnutte @jenny_nass26 Yup. Beschrieben z.B. in "Assessing ExxonMobil’s global warming projections", Science, 2023
@PatrickDalroy12 @Neuropa_ Ale podaj konkretne przykłady i przytocz dowody. Ja tobie podam wyznawców prawicowego lysenkizmu https://t.co/wBpIxNHm9s https://t.co/MPa5S3S5T9 https://t.co/mOzkxirW8R https://t.co/uj7Fhgjh8N.
@A_F_Laverdiere @LeonSimons8 It's far more plausible that you're getting paid (or are a useful idiot) to repeat the same denial nonsense peddled by the oil lobby. My theory actually has a clear profit motive https://t.co/2a8I8ZbGCR
@mwt2008 @cmd_alt_delete @MatthewWielicki @grok what methodological flaws and ideological bias appear in the study "Assessing ExxonMobil’s global warming projections"?
@systemnutte @jenny_nass26 Yup. Beschrieben z.B. in "Assessing ExxonMobil’s global warming projections", Science, 2023
@technowurstbrot @_ClimateCraze Literally models by Exxon scientists predicting what would happen. Not only were the predictions very good, but the handcasts were great too. Until you people tell us why OIL COMPANIES can’t be right, you can’t be trusted. https://t.co/Nu5doETMro
@_ClimateCraze Like these Exxon guys, John. So many narratives that all say the same thing with pretty good predictive power Hey, now that you’re gleeful, can you finally put units in that fantastic plot of yours with all the sinusoids? No need to hide the genius now! https://t.co/Nu5doETMro
@_ClimateCraze @Kobehardi How did these folks do John? https://t.co/Nu5doETMro
@rexdelay @_ClimateCraze https://t.co/Nu5doETMro
@MarkJan08409037 @_ClimateCraze Exxon is loaded with weak-minded fools who are climate alarmists: https://t.co/Nu5doETMro
@Einzelkampfer2 @_ClimateCraze How about these folks? What do you think of Exxon’s credibility? They pretty much nailed it, huh? https://t.co/Nu5doETMro
@PatrickSSte @_ClimateCraze Yeah, tell me about it. Just look at these totally untrustworthy climate models by Exxon that pretty much nailed the prediction and hi scat’s in what happened. Damn oil companies lying like that. https://t.co/Nu5doETMro
@_ClimateCraze https://t.co/Nu5doETMro
@periodicaudio @stephen1e4 @balls95652097 @ChrisMartzWX Cherry-picking the Russian model (an outlier) doesn't invalidate the IPCC & Spencer's data has been repeatedly criticised for bias. Observed warming still matches. If the IPCC is a problem, what about Exxon? Their model was accurate 50 years ago: https://t.co/pDdhg1l5Rt
@djreiner @LittleB59019540 @EliotJacobson @grok You must be SUPER interested to learn that Exxon's own scientists predicted today's warming back in the 70's at 0.2 +/- 0.04 C/decade... ...Oh wait, I guess not interested at all since you'd rather quote disinformation than learn, I dunno, anything? https://t.co/ZDqEXuzxSd
RT @annizary: Assessing ExxonMobil’s global warming projections | Science https://t.co/ZDvUcxvR5j
Assessing ExxonMobil’s global warming projections | Science https://t.co/ZDvUcxvR5j
7️⃣ #Exxons interne Modelle sagten die heutige Erwärmung bereits in den #1970ern ziemlich genau voraus – verschwiegen wurde es trotzdem. https://t.co/imI9HUEpoP
@freetotem @z_zb007 @Mericamemed Even Exxon's relatively simply projection for average global temperature matches current observations. You have clearly been conned by dishonest bloggers. - https://t.co/kHDkflxv8H . https://t.co/EccjSOqCYk .
@Nikolaoz @whstancil Meanwhile back on planet earth, even Exxon’s scientists predicted global warming via AGW modeling with impressive accuracy decades ago. https://t.co/M6wHhuxsl5
@nanoscalebiomed Però tieni, un paio di link per iniziare a capire come funzionano le cose: https://t.co/6HOp6aKurk https://t.co/KowJK7dkbF https://t.co/EDVbOdEk5Z https://t.co/fsMgNRhH8c Scommetto che il nesso tra queste cose tu sia perfettamente in grado di trovarlo da solo.
@E_Boeminghaus Die Klimaprojektionen aus den 1970er waren erstaunlich akkurat... https://t.co/7eKvU8RBHz
@E_Boeminghaus Diese Langzeittrends sind auch einfacher als das Wetter der nächsten Wochen. Wissenschaftler haben den Temperaturanstieg in den 1970er Jahren mit hoher Genauigkeit vorhergesagt. https://t.co/7eKvU8RBHz
@Pinperepette @sciasbolo @lucabc @climacritic Perché sarebbero incertezze rilevanti per simulare l'evoluzione della T globale, i.e. l'energia del sistema clima? Nel modello Exxon Mobil, l'anomalia risultava solo dall'aumento della CO2 atm. e rispondeva già alla domanda https://t.co/VDG3D5Jxwq https://t.co/b5SekgVy4v
@LaffingMunkyboy @feelthebern624 @iamAtheistGirl The basic tenet of science is that it’s built on testable hypotheses and evidence. Even Exxon's own research confirmed fossil fuels' role in global warming decades ago. https://t.co/M6wHhuwUvx
RT @TWTThisIsNow: @MagnumO28311564 @feelthebern624 @iamAtheistGirl Even Exxon’s scientists predicted global warming via AGW modeling with a…
@robert_kliemann @iamAtheistGirl ALL climate scientists agree man-made global warming is a scientific fact. Even Exxon's own research confirmed fossil fuels' role in global warming decades ago. https://t.co/M6wHhuxsl5
@MagnumO28311564 @feelthebern624 @iamAtheistGirl Even Exxon’s scientists predicted global warming via AGW modeling with an impressive degree of accuracy decades ago. Do you really think Exxon's scientists told them "what they wanted to hear"? https://t.co/M6wHhuxsl5
@EricRussell82 @iamAtheistGirl Indeed. All of the global warming "skeptics" who predicted the end of global warming many years ago are wrong, while even Exxon’s scientists predicted global warming with impressive accuracy via AGW theory decades ago. https://t.co/M6wHhuxsl5
@HeyYaNow143 @jetlining @rhcm123 Actually we know why, don't we. Because even when an oil company's own scientists investigate this issue, they come to the same conclusions: https://t.co/ecqVr2tyBZ
@unrealbobtaylor @TheTNHoller @RepTimBurchett Unironically, they had a part in setting the stage for today's rampant denialism. They knew man-made climate change was real and developed models on par with academic and gov research. Yet they chose to downplay the findings and gaslight the public. https://t.co/T3ZkjQT3ZY
@ah_ecco @RobertoGiuffre @DanEtti @skdh https://t.co/AQ1qo4Z6HS
@FightCards47 @cwebbonline The average global temperature is trending upward much higher, and faster, than it would naturally. The basic causal mechanism for this has been understood for a long time, as several fossil fuel companies' archives show. https://t.co/EzZwgOvvrH
@alexboge @RichHomieEsh @moultano Its literally on record that oil and manufacturing exects knew about global warming as early as the 70's and paid to bury the information https://t.co/scLmKfnFrb
@Pinperepette @MaurizioVoltini @pipcoman Per delineare meglio il mio personalissimo pensiero: non devono pagare i “danni” le persone comuni, zio Peppe con la Panda, per capirci. Devono pagarli chi SAPEVA ed ha taciuto e “oscurato”. Lo sapevano. Almeno dal 1970. https://t.co/xqPszbfmdW
@FHeidolon @rosikone @ildinolib @intuslegens Qui ci sono i modelli di exxon mobill degli anni ‘80 e le valutazioni dei nostri https://t.co/7S1jUv9vXf https://t.co/EDVbOdERVx
RT @ClausTahler: @ElefantImRaum2 @IngmarStadelman Warum fragst du nicht Vertreter der Fossil-Industrie woher sie es bereits vor >50 Jahren…
@ElefantImRaum2 @IngmarStadelman Warum fragst du nicht Vertreter der Fossil-Industrie woher sie es bereits vor >50 Jahren wussten, dass es eine Krise geben wird? https://t.co/yOnBheHOgA
RT @JEgoZUS: Słuchacie denialiści i fani teorii spiskowych. Szukacie prawdy i nie chcecie być oszukiwani, to dlaczego milczcie na temat jed…
Słuchacie denialiści i fani teorii spiskowych. Szukacie prawdy i nie chcecie być oszukiwani, to dlaczego milczcie na temat jednego z większych oszust w dziejach ludzkości. Dlaczego ExxonMobil ukrył modele emiscji CO2 skoro wy uważacie że CO2 nie szkodzi
@drakeknight65 @RichardAngwin @atrupar Exxon knew about climate change: https://t.co/t75w2NyN8k In the 1980s: https://t.co/wArYMuP9t6 Which means you're either a corporate shill or an imbecile. Which is it?
@hal9000xp188961 @volcaholic1 The relationship between atmospheric CO2 and average global temperature is very well understood and that provides more than enough reason to act: - https://t.co/NBBT8RROv4 - https://t.co/f4JMojRXFW - https://t.co/XNRZLnXUwl - https://t.co/eJquug6bYh .
<https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.abk0063>
@averagejoe314 @BritPetroleumPR Instead of warning the public, they funded climate denial groups to delay action. (Source: Oreskes & Supran, 2021)
RT @LiveInMushLove: Photograph: Supran, et al., 2023, “Assessing ExxonMobil’s global warming projections” https://t.co/ry2b3FgHnu
@RogerCoppock @Anvndarnamn5 @kevhof52 @Robert76907841 @Konrad_Chapman @kissingtruth @jemmm85517813 @patfrank830 @CyfraithEcocide @DaleGribble_666 @AutumnMandrake @TMGFlorida @PoyetPatrice @idummkopp @priscian @MusicFrom90 @Proemed45 @MarcEHJones @Rebecca74083947 @25_cycle @NdabaningiMoyo @Visitor51171015 @rwerkh @DoubleDumas @COrepKdeGraaf @ejwwest @greenartdf @zebedeem @BennoList @Willard1951 @LxxResearcher @waynejv1973 @VoteBlueUrban @military_1776 @TWTThisIsNow @BrknMan @RCownie @ICcrapdaily @ClimateRetorts @CymaticWave @DarrenDrpage @SGMTrailbuilder @MarkOgge @JrmeBrwnCt @TheDisproof @judithcallagha9 @psud12 When one accounts for non-CO2 forcings, one ends up with a TCR of closer to 2K per doubling, instead of 3K. https://t.co/A4XwBfw3Ui https://t.co/Ejc8gNhj90 https://t.co/5ZC28IgzLk https://t.co/dTWqiirAWY https://t.co/JUifGnDzl0 https://t.co/qhZA7aQAt2 https://t.co/tcaNe36zPX ht
@patfrank830 @AtomsksSanakan @PoyetPatrice @idummkopp @Konrad_Chapman @JamesWest12 @TMGFlorida @AutumnMandrake @priscian @MusicFrom90 @kissingtruth @kevhof52 @Proemed45 @Robert76907841 @MarcEHJones @Rebecca74083947 @25_cycle @NdabaningiMoyo @Visitor51171015 @rwerkh @DoubleDumas @Anvndarnamn5 @COrepKdeGraaf @DaleGribble_666 @ejwwest @greenartdf @zebedeem @BennoList @LxxResearcher @waynejv1973 @VoteBlueUrban @jemmm85517813 @military_1776 @TWTThisIsNow @BrknMan @RCownie @ICcrapdaily @ClimateRetorts @CymaticWave @DarrenDrpage @SGMTrailbuilder @CyfraithEcocide @MarkOgge @SteB777 @JrmeBrwnCt @TheDisproof @judithcallagha9 @psud12 Pat, that's Figure 1C in the Supran et al 2023 look at the internal Exxon documents (in this case an Exxon doc from 1977) from their scientists working on projecting climate You and others can check, part even shows up from the doi (lower right) https://t.co/orNZnISI9E
@maikpi70 An Exxon projection even correctly predicted 1977 that the use of fossil fuels would cause "climate change" https://t.co/Ly8CVfnvFb Assessing ExxonMobil’s global warming projections https://t.co/ysO2328UAc https://t.co/wmWfUDBHEz
RT @HuiaSue: Assessing ExxonMobil’s global warming projections: #BigOil #Koch #AtlasNetwork & #Project2025 https://t.co/fYRLth6RKI
RT @HuiaSue: Assessing ExxonMobil’s global warming projections: #BigOil #Koch #AtlasNetwork & #Project2025 https://t.co/fYRLth6RKI
Assessing ExxonMobil’s global warming projections https://t.co/fYRLth6RKI https://t.co/ortm6o1qS3
RT @HuiaSue: Assessing ExxonMobil’s global warming projections: #BigOil #Koch #AtlasNetwork & #Project2025 https://t.co/fYRLth6RKI
RT @HuiaSue: Assessing ExxonMobil’s global warming projections: #BigOil #Koch #AtlasNetwork & #Project2025 https://t.co/fYRLth6RKI
Assessing ExxonMobil’s global warming projections: #BigOil #Koch #AtlasNetwork & #Project2025 https://t.co/fYRLth6RKI
Assessing ExxonMobil’s global warming projections | Science https://t.co/go2SHcPJki @exxonmobil Another unaccountable, “free market” mold spore on our species. @UNFCCC It’s funny how big energy totes the Free Market Economics as science yet ignores, well, actual science.
Assessing ExxonMobil’s global warming projections | Science https://t.co/9iEXGNKC8j
Assessing ExxonMobil’s global warming projections | Science https://t.co/kVpBkZzRsl 化石燃料企業のひとつであるエクソンモービルが、独立した学術的・政府的モデルによる予測と一致する温暖化予測モデルを社内に持っていたことを明らかにしている。
Assessing ExxonMobil’s global warming projections | Science https://t.co/Obuf5e9ugW
@hausfath @red_standing Random question, if you're willing + have time: What would be the implied TCR for observed warming for 2000-2023? I think 2000-2023 forcing is here: https://t.co/O5CkIJitSk So basically similar to these: https://t.co/Ejc8gNgLjs https://t.co/A4XwBfvw4K https://t.co/X3hi0kh6T7
Even including forcings other than CO2, the post-2000 trend would be ≥1.5°C of non-equilibrium warming per doubling of CO2. Still larger than Shaviv's proposed equilibrium trend. https://t.co/A4XwBfvw4K [https://t.co/O5CkIJitSk] https://t.co/Ejc8gNgLjs https://t.co/4u0QkLqpRi
@EdWellham @LxxResearcher @BoryanLeChat @BrknMan @ejwwest @alangnixon @kissingtruth @ICcrapdaily @Konrad_Chapman @FredHikes @NdabaningiMoyo @TWTThisIsNow @AtomsksSanakan @GlonvecHQ @CymaticWave @BarbaraGirouard @WHPAAD @DoubleDumas @Willard1951 @patfrank830 @Pow_Pop_Blam @ClimateRetorts @mic12052 @covid_quest @MLiebreich @DarrenDrpage @DeadheadJP99 @agentsinaction @Wim_Ondewhybak_ @Frnc_prep @MartinJBern @hairymarx1 @priscian @HeidlerNeal @ericonthetrail @bobathon @Dooderoo @DuosEquis @25_cycle @WHUT @cohler @JoernWiedemann @Redoubtably10 @BStarr96522 @GeraldKutney @OceanadeSilva @Bazthebemused @USAMRIID_CA @Robert76907841 @FriedrichFiles Geoffrey Supran, Stefan Rahmstorf and Naomi Oreskes (2023) "Assessing ExxonMobil’s global warming projections" is a disgrace to the scientific method (and to intelligence). Science (journal) is one more time discredited after that. https://t.co/iEYPki9k
@patfrank830 @BoryanLeChat @PoyetPatrice @BarbaraGirouard @kissingtruth @AtomsksSanakan @LxxResearcher @GlonvecHQ @ICcrapdaily @CymaticWave @TWTThisIsNow @WHPAAD @DoubleDumas @alangnixon @BrknMan @Pow_Pop_Blam @ClimateRetorts @mic12052 @covid_quest @FredHikes @ejwwest @MLiebreich @DarrenDrpage @DeadheadJP99 @agentsinaction @Wim_Ondewhybak_ @Konrad_Chapman @Frnc_prep @MartinJBern @hairymarx1 @priscian @HeidlerNeal @ericonthetrail @bobathon @Dooderoo @DuosEquis @25_cycle @WHUT @cohler @JoernWiedemann @Redoubtably10 @BStarr96522 @GeraldKutney @OceanadeSilva @Bazthebemused @USAMRIID_CA @Robert76907841 @FriedrichFiles @BatcaveSlimer The basic physics and chemistry that Exxon used to model increases in temperature from rising greenhouse gases was correct Supran et al 'Assessing ExxonMobil's global warming projections' Science v379 eabk0063 2023 https://t.co/orNZnISI9E
@skdh Assessing ExxonMobil’s global warming projections from the late 70’s / early 80’s. https://t.co/kynCPW630Y
RT @RusselNorman: Oil companies told the public there was serious uncertainty about climate science. But their internal research from the 1…
RT @RusselNorman: Oil companies told the public there was serious uncertainty about climate science. But their internal research from the 1…
RT @RusselNorman: Oil companies told the public there was serious uncertainty about climate science. But their internal research from the 1…
RT @HGrunbichler: Österreichische Kleingeistigkeit par excellance vs. Wissenschaftlichkeit: Assessing ExxonMobil’s global warming projectio…
Österreichische Kleingeistigkeit par excellance vs. Wissenschaftlichkeit: Assessing ExxonMobil’s global warming projections. Abb. aus https://t.co/kh1EJki1Be. https://t.co/rQe6rDEIA6 https://t.co/T7w3znCBuA
RT @RusselNorman: Oil companies told the public there was serious uncertainty about climate science. But their internal research from the 1…
RT @RusselNorman: Oil companies told the public there was serious uncertainty about climate science. But their internal research from the 1…
RT @RusselNorman: Oil companies told the public there was serious uncertainty about climate science. But their internal research from the 1…
RT @RusselNorman: Oil companies told the public there was serious uncertainty about climate science. But their internal research from the 1…
RT @RusselNorman: Oil companies told the public there was serious uncertainty about climate science. But their internal research from the 1…
RT @RusselNorman: Oil companies told the public there was serious uncertainty about climate science. But their internal research from the 1…
RT @RusselNorman: Oil companies told the public there was serious uncertainty about climate science. But their internal research from the 1…
RT @RusselNorman: Oil companies told the public there was serious uncertainty about climate science. But their internal research from the 1…
RT @RusselNorman: Oil companies told the public there was serious uncertainty about climate science. But their internal research from the 1…
RT @RusselNorman: Oil companies told the public there was serious uncertainty about climate science. But their internal research from the 1…
RT @RusselNorman: Oil companies told the public there was serious uncertainty about climate science. But their internal research from the 1…
RT @RusselNorman: Oil companies told the public there was serious uncertainty about climate science. But their internal research from the 1…
RT @RusselNorman: Oil companies told the public there was serious uncertainty about climate science. But their internal research from the 1…
RT @RusselNorman: Oil companies told the public there was serious uncertainty about climate science. But their internal research from the 1…
RT @RusselNorman: Oil companies told the public there was serious uncertainty about climate science. But their internal research from the 1…
RT @RusselNorman: Oil companies told the public there was serious uncertainty about climate science. But their internal research from the 1…
RT @RusselNorman: Oil companies told the public there was serious uncertainty about climate science. But their internal research from the 1…
RT @RusselNorman: Oil companies told the public there was serious uncertainty about climate science. But their internal research from the 1…
RT @RusselNorman: Oil companies told the public there was serious uncertainty about climate science. But their internal research from the 1…
RT @RusselNorman: Oil companies told the public there was serious uncertainty about climate science. But their internal research from the 1…
RT @RusselNorman: Oil companies told the public there was serious uncertainty about climate science. But their internal research from the 1…
RT @RusselNorman: Oil companies told the public there was serious uncertainty about climate science. But their internal research from the 1…
RT @RusselNorman: Oil companies told the public there was serious uncertainty about climate science. But their internal research from the 1…
RT @RusselNorman: Oil companies told the public there was serious uncertainty about climate science. But their internal research from the 1…
RT @RusselNorman: Oil companies told the public there was serious uncertainty about climate science. But their internal research from the 1…
Oil companies told the public there was serious uncertainty about climate science. But their internal research from the 1970s showed the opposite, and has been pretty accurate: Assessing ExxonMobil’s global warming projections https://t.co/7XY9m48PnE
RT @RaveCozensHardy: @spudulike1965 @DaleVince @LordWalney If you want to understand what actual scientists were saying: In “Assessing Exxo…
@spudulike1965 @DaleVince @LordWalney If you want to understand what actual scientists were saying: In “Assessing ExxonMobil’s Global Warming Projections,” researchers from Harvard and the Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research https://t.co/9ZXUwT085B As opposed to fake news idiots like Epstein.
RT @Birdseye1: @ruxcytbl @FChecker76 @Forsolace @Seniorveteran @LetFuryHaveThe1 @306ismyfavnum @TheWreckingBal5 @garygreno @durandundee7105…
@ruxcytbl @FChecker76 @Forsolace @Seniorveteran @LetFuryHaveThe1 @306ismyfavnum @TheWreckingBal5 @garygreno @durandundee7105 @sandraclunie @Trump @MichaelRapaport @seniorvet @OfficialFBOP @aaas @theNASEM @PNASNews @AEI @SenTuberville @NOAA @ScienceMagazine "Assessing ExxonMobil’s global warming projections" https://t.co/jCka6x1K6P
@CaseColo @briebriejoy ExxonMobil knows that climate change caused by fossil fuels is real. They knew it back in the 1970s. "Assessing ExxonMobil’s global warming projections" G. Supran et al., Science, Jan. 13, 2023 https://t.co/OZbigAP8Pj
@zauberberg188 2/2 Assessing ExxonMobil’s global warming projections Kann man hier nachlesen und dann überlegen, ob das IPCC lügt… https://t.co/nUBvKluow4
@jeffleb89495079 @CrimsonxxMana @markianrubin @RespecterTrail @C_Kavanagh Here's another paper, this time looking at how accurate Exxon's internal climate change reports from the 70s were in predicting the 90s, 2000s, 2010s, and early 2020s. Spoiler, shockingly accurate given their nature as pre-computer models (https://t.co/QqEs5JkQBc)
@FrankfurtZack @HolzheuStefan Ach Zackig ... Weißt du was? Selbst deine besten Freunde der Ölkonzerne wussten bereits vor Jahrzehnten was passieren wird. Schon komisch, gell? https://t.co/krgbcx5Wsm Assessing ExxonMobil’s global warming projections
@aaronshem @priscian @JimBowersclimb @curryja That paper shows the modeled warming trend is ~20% larger than observations, not the ~50% you claimed. You've been shown that multiple times, so you can stop pretending. https://t.co/LsYpAcQaEG https://t.co/2peJQoMEIJ https://t.co/sj9RsViEfr https://t.co/Ejc8gNgLjs https://t.co/NTXwOjLTi9
@aaronshem @priscian @JimBowersclimb @curryja You don't know what the modeled trend is. You instead just look at one start-point + one end-point. But that won't tell you the trend because this is not a straight line: https://t.co/Ejc8gNgLjs https://t.co/mE8Aobncvp
@aaronshem @priscian @JimBowersclimb @curryja @ClimateOfGavin Again, one does not determine a trend (or "rate") by looking at only the start-point and end-point. Yet that's what you tried to do. The projected rate was not ~50% larger than observations. https://t.co/lYWQS90Gi6 https://t.co/Ejc8gNgLjs https://t.co/9d9ADFRh0i
@aaronshem @priscian @JimBowersclimb @curryja One doesn't determine *trend* by only looking at the start-point and the end-point. https://t.co/Oc2IuVBkAi https://t.co/Ejc8gNgLjs https://t.co/7i5CnVUlkr
@aaronshem @priscian @JimBowersclimb @curryja No, what's fake is the notion you promoted that hydroxychloroquine works for SARS-CoV-2, non-expert contrarian ideologue. Anyway, let folks know when you've learned how to calculate a *trend*. https://t.co/3lazEMtemF https://t.co/Ejc8gNgLjs https://t.co/VTx3kAjV5V
@priscian @aaronshem @JimBowersclimb @curryja Though the Glaser 1982 implied TCR estimate (i.e. shorter-term climate sensitivity) was less accurate than work from the IPCC + from other climate modeling in the academic literature. https://t.co/Ejc8gNgLjs https://t.co/A4XwBfvw4K https://t.co/69jv9p3YA5
@priscian @aaronshem @JimBowersclimb @curryja That 'Exxon' analysis looks like figure 3 of Glaser 1982 (page 7): https://t.co/1PdLKGQa7h Observed warming and CO2 increases were a bit less than projected. https://t.co/Ejc8gNgLjs https://t.co/7ZAu2B3Clq
Oil companies saw it coming, but didn’t sound any alarm. Assessing ExxonMobil’s global warming projections | Science https://t.co/wooYrZTg71
Assessing ExxonMobil’s global warming projections | Science what the F https://t.co/t7I2JCSPuw
Assessing ExxonMobil’s global warming projections | Science https://t.co/XfzDvFGp9S
@IanISSawesome @joshlbrooks @curryja @NilsTillander @ejwwest @MichaelEMann @GeraldKutney @MatthewWielicki @maxinthevalley @jordanbpeterson Again, go do your homework. "climate models published over the past five decades were generally quite accurate in predicting global warming in the years after publication" https://t.co/Isj3TCoPS8 https://t.co/Ejc8gNgLjs https://t.co/zaQIY3NwSl https://t.co/PfrarWZh4B https://t.co/Wd0Kuof00w
2⃣ Assessing ExxonMobil's global warming projections by @GeoffreySupran et al This study reveals that oil company ExxonMobil “knew as much as academic and government scientists knew" about global warming decades ago, but they "worked to deny it”. https://t.co/c6ADFlZM21
RT @JoergAltSJ: •BBC (2022) Big Oil vs the World tells the40 year story of how the oil industry delayed action on climate change https://t.…
•BBC (2022) Big Oil vs the World tells the40 year story of how the oil industry delayed action on climate change https://t.co/KLBhvEYoKp •Supran, G., Oreskes, N., Rahmstorf, S. (2023): Assessing ExxonMobil’s global warming projections. Science https://t.co/hh6buToeRf
Exxon Knew
Reminder: Exxon Knew❗
"The company that will become Exxon bragging about supplying enough energy to melt 7 million tons of glacier every day. Circa 1970s" (from altext) & @naomioreskes.bsky.social et al 2023 paper "Assessing ExxonMobil’s global warming projections" www.science.org/doi/10.1126/... #STS #histsci
Exxon knew about the consequences of fossil energy sources since 1977. Instead of living up to their responsibility, a huge worldwide climate denier network was built up. 'Assessing ExxonMobil’s global warming projections' www.science.org/doi/10.1126/...
(janvier 2023) 'Assessing ExxonMobil’s global warming projections' : https://t.co/SOF6DpBngQ https://t.co/FNq52va3m8
@AISafetyMemes Exxon predicted climate change and plowed ahead anyway. All of the evidence says markets can't be trusted to solve this. https://t.co/IVFoo7kx8z
Assessing ExxonMobil’s global warming projections Pendant des décennies, ExxonMobil a tenté de discrédité les sciences climatiques. Tandis qu'en interne, ses chercheurs confirmaient les projections de changement climatique. www.science.org/doi/10.1126/...
@ER_Korhola Aikuisten oikeesti
Assessing ExxonMobil’s global warming projections https://t.co/uWHW1jvSEm
Climate projections published in science journals by Exxon's geophysicists in the 1970s match NASA's ten years later. Bookmark it. Supran et al 2023 "Assessing ExxonMobil’s global warming projections" in the top tier journal Science. www.science.org/doi/10.1126/...
Assessing ExxonMobil’s global warming projections | Science https://t.co/bm1JMNWZ6E @ABDanielleSmith @PremierScottMoe @Alberta_UCP @SaskParty
@OmegaMom_ @hausfath @brearkeologi "Assessing ExxonMobil’s global warming projections" https://t.co/dF5RZoAoRc https://t.co/dqQSONcgAs
Assessing ExxonMobil’s global warming projections | Science #science #sustainability #alternativeenergy https://t.co/stL05btJHz
Assessing ExxonMobil’s global warming projections | Science https://t.co/8cJlJMusC4
RT @AtomsksSanakan: 34/P https://t.co/XXFIQrQHoH https://t.co/BWqlIyVcf8 PaperOfTheDay "Assessing ExxonMobil’s global warming projection…
34/P https://t.co/XXFIQrQHoH https://t.co/BWqlIyVcf8 PaperOfTheDay "Assessing ExxonMobil’s global warming projections [...] N. Oreskes" https://t.co/oV3GV8Emml https://t.co/9lFiGjSmkW
RT @han_dolman: They knew, all along….. Assessing ExxonMobil’s global warming projections https://t.co/fqtpSVMZh5
Assessing ExxonMobil’s global warming projections | Science https://t.co/DEkwK5DToQ
RT @HavaClimate: New Climate News: Assessing ExxonMobil’s global warming projections #climatecrisis #climateaction #esg #carbon #sustain…
New Climate News: Assessing ExxonMobil’s global warming projections #climatecrisis #climateaction #esg #carbon #sustainability #netzero #climatescam #globalwarming #climatechange https://t.co/BXwkdrBWAX
RT @fridays_freedom: EXXON wußte nicht! In einer peer-reviewed Arbeit https://t.co/C3AQqehC3D behaupten #Rahmstorf et al, dass #Exxon zu Be…
RT @fridays_freedom: EXXON wußte nicht! In einer peer-reviewed Arbeit https://t.co/C3AQqehC3D behaupten #Rahmstorf et al, dass #Exxon zu Be…
RT @fridays_freedom: EXXON wußte nicht! In einer peer-reviewed Arbeit https://t.co/C3AQqehC3D behaupten #Rahmstorf et al, dass #Exxon zu Be…
RT @fridays_freedom: EXXON wußte nicht! In einer peer-reviewed Arbeit https://t.co/C3AQqehC3D behaupten #Rahmstorf et al, dass #Exxon zu Be…
RT @fridays_freedom: EXXON wußte nicht! In einer peer-reviewed Arbeit https://t.co/C3AQqehC3D behaupten #Rahmstorf et al, dass #Exxon zu Be…
RT @fridays_freedom: EXXON wußte nicht! In einer peer-reviewed Arbeit https://t.co/C3AQqehC3D behaupten #Rahmstorf et al, dass #Exxon zu Be…
RT @fridays_freedom: EXXON wußte nicht! In einer peer-reviewed Arbeit https://t.co/C3AQqehC3D behaupten #Rahmstorf et al, dass #Exxon zu Be…
RT @fridays_freedom: EXXON wußte nicht! In einer peer-reviewed Arbeit https://t.co/C3AQqehC3D behaupten #Rahmstorf et al, dass #Exxon zu Be…
EXXON wußte nicht! In einer peer-reviewed Arbeit https://t.co/C3AQqehC3D behaupten #Rahmstorf et al, dass #Exxon zu Beginn der 80er Jahre wußte, dass durch CO2 das Klima verändert wird. Pat. #Frank, Ph.D., Chemiker an der Stanford Uni, Cal., widerlegt diese Aussage und zeigt https://t.co/5iA48UllD6
Assessing ExxonMobil’s global warming projections https://t.co/IQgyElHeEl
@Harti23L @Leelah1 @MartinBalluch "Assessing ExxonMobil’s global warming projections" https://t.co/K9317eHx1A
Assessing ExxonMobil's global warming projections - Science https://t.co/4Y4Fe0QCjn https://t.co/nKwMJTwF8B
@riverolavic @Esparregueraera La idea errónea de muchos negacionistas de que el clima actual es fruto de un ciclo es errónea, un reciente artículo de NATURE lo explica. Por cierto, los informes ya preveian hace años esta situación: Assessing ExxonMobil’s Global Warming Projections, Science (80-. ) (2023).
Assessing ExxonMobil’s global warming projections | Science https://t.co/4MleM9RQ88
ExxonMobil definitively knew the extent of climate change decades before the public and consistently contradicts their own research https://t.co/KApjbLWf6x https://t.co/IGV7sfowER
RT @gigaspora1952: 長い間、地球温暖化は不確かだと言ってきたエクソンモービルは、実は、1970年代に独自の内部モデルでCO2による温暖化を予測していた。 >Assessing ExxonMobil’s global warming projections h…
RT @medicalwriting3: Assessing ExxonMobil’s global warming projections エクソンモービル社の地球温暖化予測の評価 https://t.co/O4RTjrkyn3
Assessing ExxonMobil’s global warming projections | Science Assessing ExxonMobil’s global warming projections OLJELOBBYN VISSTE REDAN PÅ 70-TALET ATT DET SKULLE GÅ ÅT HELVETE
RT @Brigittelgb: Los científicos de las grandes petroleras proyectaron bien los modelos, pero los ejecutivos y sus agencias de publicidad l…
RT @Brigittelgb: Los científicos de las grandes petroleras proyectaron bien los modelos, pero los ejecutivos y sus agencias de publicidad l…
RT @Brigittelgb: Los científicos de las grandes petroleras proyectaron bien los modelos, pero los ejecutivos y sus agencias de publicidad l…
RT @Brigittelgb: Los científicos de las grandes petroleras proyectaron bien los modelos, pero los ejecutivos y sus agencias de publicidad l…
RT @Brigittelgb: Los científicos de las grandes petroleras proyectaron bien los modelos, pero los ejecutivos y sus agencias de publicidad l…
RT @Brigittelgb: Los científicos de las grandes petroleras proyectaron bien los modelos, pero los ejecutivos y sus agencias de publicidad l…
RT @Brigittelgb: Los científicos de las grandes petroleras proyectaron bien los modelos, pero los ejecutivos y sus agencias de publicidad l…
RT @Brigittelgb: Los científicos de las grandes petroleras proyectaron bien los modelos, pero los ejecutivos y sus agencias de publicidad l…
@Tanguy_Cornec @GerhardKrinner @Fnac @FonfredeMichel @journey6369 @GVilleval @catnatnet @FlayDeni ➡️ pas que des enfants de cœur derrière la désinformation (Les Marchands de doute ou https://t.co/yEeYkwR2Bl) + couverture médiatique disproportionnée par rapport au consensus scientifique : https://t.co/LIdl1qB24Y
@mottani38 @hansvantelling Weliswaar geen fysica, maar zoals het voorbeeld beschreven in bijgaand review uit Science? Het klimaatonderzoek van Exxon? De resultaten uit dit onderzoek en uit onafhankelijke studies worden overigens door zeker persoon ontkend. https://t.co/Je8ZyEV4jz
‘Assessing ExxonMobil’s Global Warming Projections’ Science, 13 Jan 2023 https://t.co/92K1OoI3Ym "ExxonMobil’s projections accurately forecast warming consistent with later observations... However, the company’s public statements about climate science contradicted its own data."
For trying to convince the public to believe that a causative link between fossil fuel use and climate warming could not be made: Fuck you .@exxonmobil Supran, G., et al. (2023). Assessing ExxonMobil’s global warming projections. Science, 379(6628). https://t.co/v0cC2PtIqj https://t.co/ZtV68iuKUu
Assessing ExxonMobil’s #GlobalWarming projections#Exxon scientists have predicted global warming with impressive accuracy since 1977. Great scientists. https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.abk0063?utm_medium=social&utm_source=twitter
Assessing ExxonMobil’s #GlobalWarming projections#Exxon scientists have predicted global warming with impressive accuracy since 1977. Great scientists. https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.abk0063?utm_medium=social&utm_source=twitter
@inforiist @Jaisans @jonwaldron @ZombiePiano @RichwoodsAus @agentsinaction @Anvndarnamn5 @Convict025 @JR4_Truth @roger_clague @d_e_mol @ejwwest @BubbasRanch @Veritatem2021 @dude_america @lynnmcbeth @Mark_A_Lunn @AtomsksSanakan @TakethatCt @aSinister @nalonjack @Enlight42 @BJChippindale @MarionMartin199 @MephistoTabern1 @OBundWIE @jpgcrowley @VictorJennpaul @SniemN @RushhourP @JohnDublin10 @RickLazzarini @JamesAbbott2013 @DrMarkJoyce1 @Neilcharles1450 @Projectedsouli1 @glinch72 @IanHugh07940666 @TheDisproof @DocSnow1 @LouisCy72344053 @fagandr1 @njbtweet @jefftonna1 @27Legin @TheKingsTrigger @B_Bolshevik100 @25_cycle @bashannon Major scientific journal trumps amateurish blog. https://t.co/bEHu04XHVn
Supran, Rahmstorf y Oreskes (2023). Assessing ExxonMobil’s global warming projections. https://t.co/8dAHIk6aqR @science
"The Exxon Knowledge" (Abb. A) mache ich als HTL-Lehrer immer als Vorbereitung zum Planspiel einer Ökobilanzierung der unterschiedlichen Antriebsarten (Verbrenner vs. BEV) durch. Abb. entnommen aus https://t.co/kh1EJki1Be https://t.co/LnUnKi6UOM
They knew it since the late 1970s, but they always worked to deny it. QED. https://t.co/14B6it8AZd https://t.co/JkZIxL7kUp
‘Assessing ExxonMobil’s Global Warming Projections’ Science, 13 Jan 2023 https://t.co/92K1OoI3Ym "Most projections accurately forecast warming consistent with subsequent observations. Their projections were also consistent with those of independent academic & government models."
https://t.co/Do2HX2wyvF Twitter thread by study author: https://t.co/3Iloy3CSW9 #Science #Environment #ClimateChange #Climate #Exxon #Fraud #GlobalWarming #Carbon #Emissions #FossilFuels https://t.co/hK46b6Nj9Q (2/2) https://t.co/jGebCus4eI
@climateskeptic4 @ge0geek @ClimateDepot @mattwridley etc. etc. Global warming science due to C02 increases: a "conspiracy" so widespread and well understood that in 1982 even Exxon scientists predicted it. https://t.co/iQUqTql5T9 https://t.co/KZLUv595iK
This is indeed a fantastic scientific approach. #detectivescience reminds me of my Hudson Bay company paper back in 2000! Really worth a read!! Assessing ExxonMobil’s global warming projections https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.abk0063#.Y8EF3_hnkrg.twitter
Assessing ExxonMobil's global warming projections https://t.co/CfuIRqQmVY
Internal company memos show that, since the 1970s, Exxon knew that burning their fossil-fuel products could lead to global warming with "dramatic environmental effects before the year 2050." https://doi.org/10.1126/science.abk0063
RT @Willard1951: @25_cycle @GreyTonka @Climate_Takes @imperiallocust @FChecker76 @RichardKing633 @TheDisproof @johnson_wrjohn1 @Climatehope…
@25_cycle @GreyTonka @Climate_Takes @imperiallocust @FChecker76 @RichardKing633 @TheDisproof @johnson_wrjohn1 @Climatehope2 @LHaden_Climate @ejwwest @ThruNoiz @DawnTJ90 @suffect @KeillerDon @Faktantarkast10 @BJChippindale @LemarbreStephen @Mike8Wallace @verycentrist @j70def @lyndon_staley @EdBohman @GrahamKirk17 @Stephen90045069 @WHUT @EcoSenseNow @RStabb26 @MorseBart @EDavidAn @MartinJBern @AreYouDerp @canncr @PDemichel @RHMcK1 @outsanest @Robert76907841 @ClimateSkeptic4 @coug62 @Bos77 @MhehedZherting @LesJohnsonHrvat @aDissentient @ChrisBBacon3 @algore @LeoDiCaprio @nytclimate @BBCNewsnight Quick FYI for you & others if you have not seen Review on Exxon's models & projections for global warming published in Science Open access for a few days Supran et al 'Assessing ExxonMobil's global warming projections' Science v379 153 & eabk0063 2023 https://t.co/orNZnISI9E