Assessing ExxonMobil's global warming projections.
G Supran, S Rahmstorf, N Oreskes
January 2023 ScienceSynopsis of Social media discussions
Numerous posts highlight specific projections made by Exxon, with phrases like 'Exxon knew' and 'impressive accuracy' frequently mentioned to emphasize disbelief that such claims were downplayed. The tone across the discussions reflects a blend of outrage and a sense of urgency about holding corporations accountable for misleading the public, evidenced by terms like 'corporate shill' and 'propaganda,' showcasing the emotional weight tied to the article's implications.
Agreement
Moderate agreementMany discussions reflect support for the findings and correctness of Exxon's projections, albeit with frustration over their lack of transparency.
Interest
High level of interestUsers show a high level of curiosity about the implications and details of the research.
Engagement
Moderate level of engagementWhile many posts engage with the article's findings, some are shallow in their analysis, focusing instead on expressing anger towards Exxon.
Impact
High level of impactThere is a strong perception that the findings will significantly influence public understanding and corporate accountability in climate science.
Social Mentions
YouTube
3 Videos
Bluesky
13 Posts
5 Posts
236 Posts
Blogs
48 Articles
News
716 Articles
16 Posts
Metrics
Video Views
6,393
Total Likes
997
Extended Reach
533,668
Social Features
1,037
Timeline: Posts about article
Top Social Media Posts
Jaroslav Faltýnek
@hraba_z Člověk má dvě možnosti: věřit bludům středočeského lokálního politika nulového významu nebo datům a pozorování špičkových vědců. Šamanovi nebo medicíně založené na důkazech. Je na každém z nás, co si vybereme.
https://t.co/ROlx63EKxz
view full post
Alisa Bokulich
"The company that will become Exxon bragging about supplying enough energy to melt 7 million tons of glacier every day. Circa 1970s" (from altext)
& @naomioreskes.bsky.social et al 2023 paper "Assessing ExxonMobil’s global warming projections"
www.science.org/doi/10.1126/...
#STS #histsci
view full post
Russel Norman
Oil companies told the public there was serious uncertainty about climate science. But their internal research from the 1970s showed the opposite, and has been pretty accurate: Assessing ExxonMobil’s global warming projections https://t.co/7XY9m48PnE
view full post
Fridays For Freedom
EXXON wußte nicht!
In einer peer-reviewed Arbeit https://t.co/C3AQqehC3D behaupten #Rahmstorf et al, dass #Exxon zu Beginn der 80er Jahre wußte, dass durch CO2 das Klima verändert wird.
Pat. #Frank, Ph.D., Chemiker an der Stanford Uni, Cal., widerlegt diese Aussage und zeigt https://t.co/5iA48UllD6
view full post
Labrys of Aëlla
Exxon knew about the consequences of fossil energy sources since 1977. Instead of living up to their responsibility, a huge worldwide climate denier network was built up.
'Assessing ExxonMobil’s global warming projections'
www.science.org/doi/10.1126/...
view full post
Posts referencing the article
ExxonMobil's Climate Research and Its Controversial Impact
ExxonMobil's own research revealed the impact of CO2 emissions on the planet decades ago. A study from Harvard and the Potsdam Institute shows that their projections were as accurate as independent models. Despite this, ExxonMobil's public stance contradicted its findings.
March 28, 2023
5,553 views
Understanding Climate Change Through Psychology and Behavior Science
Hi everyone, welcome to our channel. We discuss how psychological insights can illuminate the climate crisis. Our analysis covers key findings, including how reducing psychological distance and engaging emotions can shift beliefs and encourage action on climate change. Join us for in-depth discussions.
November 1, 2024
816 views
ExxonMobil's Climate Projections: Accuracy vs Public Statements
This video assesses ExxonMobil's climate projections from 1977 to 2003, revealing that many forecasts matched later observations. Although their predictions were scientifically accurate, ExxonMobil often contradicted their findings in public statements.
January 20, 2023
24 views
-
@RobyChil @LorisGroppo Per approfondire sui modelli: https://t.co/EDVbOdEk5Z https://t.co/7S1jUv8Y7H
view full postOctober 18, 2025
-
Roope Sutinen
@RoopeSutinen (Twitter)@Chr15V @mrwriter86 @BGatesIsaPyscho You can read the facts if you are willing to do so. https://t.co/jjRF8Zs61i
view full postOctober 17, 2025
-
Andreas Fuchs
@Andreas75269170 (Twitter)@catturd2 Really? Exxon knew... https://t.co/8wPpJOc4XB
view full postOctober 17, 2025
1
-
BullyBillionaires
@BeNoBillionaire (Twitter)1/9
view full postOctober 15, 2025
-
Andreas Fuchs
@Andreas75269170 (Twitter)@ChrisMartzWX Exxon knew.... https://t.co/8wPpJOc4XB
view full postOctober 14, 2025
-
I WILL OBLITERATE EVERYTHING
@MonkeyMyBack (Twitter)@MurrayNye25768 https://t.co/0BJvFolHG5
view full postOctober 12, 2025
-
I WILL OBLITERATE EVERYTHING
@MonkeyMyBack (Twitter)https://t.co/0BJvFolHG5
view full postOctober 12, 2025
-
I WILL OBLITERATE EVERYTHING
@MonkeyMyBack (Twitter)https://t.co/0BJvFolHG5
view full postOctober 12, 2025
-
I WILL OBLITERATE EVERYTHING
@MonkeyMyBack (Twitter)https://t.co/0BJvFolHG5
view full postOctober 12, 2025
-
I WILL OBLITERATE EVERYTHING
@MonkeyMyBack (Twitter)https://t.co/0BJvFolHG5
view full postOctober 12, 2025
-
Atomsk's Sanakan
@AtomsksSanakan (Twitter)@WeiZhangAtmos @curryja Because models actually work. Stay mad.
view full postOctober 4, 2025
1
-
Pavel Burša
@alpan66 (Twitter)RT @JaraEfko: @hraba_z Člověk má dvě možnosti: věřit bludům středočeského lokálního politika nulového významu nebo datům a pozorování špičk…
view full postOctober 3, 2025
3
-
Toms_wszystko_jest_a_potem_znika
@JEgoZUS (Twitter)@PiotrRaszkowski @Stysz @Love_Subaru1 Dziwne, że się nie odniosłeś do tego ⬇️ https://t.co/Lx5OVIcQIw
view full postOctober 3, 2025
1
-
Jaroslav Faltýnek
@JaraEfko (Twitter)RT @JaraEfko: @hraba_z Člověk má dvě možnosti: věřit bludům středočeského lokálního politika nulového významu nebo datům a pozorování špičk…
view full postOctober 3, 2025
3
-
SMRT - Strana Mírových Revolučních Tradic ✌️
@SMRTzije (Twitter)RT @JaraEfko: @hraba_z Člověk má dvě možnosti: věřit bludům středočeského lokálního politika nulového významu nebo datům a pozorování špičk…
view full postOctober 3, 2025
3
-
Jaroslav Faltýnek
@JaraEfko (Twitter)@hraba_z Člověk má dvě možnosti: věřit bludům středočeského lokálního politika nulového významu nebo datům a pozorování špičkových vědců. Šamanovi nebo medicíně založené na důkazech. Je na každém z nás, co si vybereme. https://t.co/ROlx63EKxz
view full postOctober 3, 2025
168
3
-
icarus62
@icarus62 (Twitter)@ThomasSowell Tedious fossil fuel industry propaganda. The only reason AGW is denied is to protect fossil fuel industry profits. https://t.co/mgb5zbHZWX https://t.co/pVCpT0L5kb
view full postOctober 2, 2025
1
-
Maracroix He / Him / His
@maracroix (Twitter)@Kman_Michigan @MorePerfectUS Exxon knew about climate change: https://t.co/t75w2NzkXS In the 1980s: https://t.co/wArYMuPHiE Which means you're either a corporate shill or an imbecile. Which is it?
view full postOctober 2, 2025
1
-
Toms_wszystko_jest_a_potem_znika
@JEgoZUS (Twitter)@panciosuperstar Pogoda to co inngo
view full postSeptember 30, 2025
1
-
icarus62
@icarus62 (Twitter)@MurrayNye25768 @CO2Coalition Fossil fuel companies knew. "we find that 63 to 83% of the climate projections reported by ExxonMobil scientists were accurate in predicting subsequent global warming." https://t.co/mgb5zbHZWX
view full postSeptember 28, 2025
-
Timotheus Pfeiffer
@dueyesterday (Twitter)@HackY0urReality @DevanaUkraine Of course its paranoia, mixed with ideological delusion. You ignore 100 years of documented and 50 years of predicted climate change. Even Exxon knew in the 1970ies that climate change was coming. That has nothing do do with the UN. https://t.co/JACoVoN1pV
view full postSeptember 26, 2025
-
joejoebo
@joejoebo2 (Twitter)@CieMorintouch @SergeZaka Ha bon ? C'est drôle mais des scientifiques au sein d'Exxon ont fait des études en interne sur les activités de l'entreprise fin année 70... bien avant la création du GIEC. Et devine quoi, les courbes sont édifiantes : https://t.co/rrgDxnptKs
view full postSeptember 26, 2025
2
-
Climate Watcher
@pmagn (Twitter)RT @AtomsksSanakan: @pmagn @JimBowersclimb @hausfath The Paris Agreement used CMIP5, which was as accurate as prior modeling. CMIP6 is the…
view full postSeptember 23, 2025
1
-
Atomsk's Sanakan
@AtomsksSanakan (Twitter)@Marco777Polo @hausfath Because the graph is based on a paper that focused on projections from academic publications: https://t.co/2gSKZrvlE8 If you want graphs for projections from the fossil fuel industry, then see the following (through 2019): https://t.co/dF5RZoAWGK https://t.co/Zi8zgD7sEg
view full postSeptember 23, 2025
3
-
Atomsk's Sanakan
@AtomsksSanakan (Twitter)@pmagn @JimBowersclimb @hausfath The Paris Agreement used CMIP5, which was as accurate as prior modeling. CMIP6 is the real issue, since its implied TCR is higher than prior modeling. https://t.co/5S97IWtPaf https://t.co/2gSKZruNOA https://t.co/SILqcy8ZBj https://t.co/dF5RZoAoRc https://t.co/zaQIY3NwSl https://t.co/iLNVwiaxNH
view full postSeptember 23, 2025
5
1
-
icarus62
@icarus62 (Twitter)@JunkScience Global warming denial is just a fossil fuel industry scam. We all know this. https://t.co/mgb5zbHs7p https://t.co/p71EC9tj7A
view full postSeptember 23, 2025
-
illep
@_illep (Twitter)@d_r_a_z_i_l @borghi_claudio Tieni, questi sono i tuoi amici: https://t.co/EDVbOdEk5Z
view full postSeptember 22, 2025
-
illep
@_illep (Twitter)@RossiMario4229 @fsutto @Walii_Hs @ing_xxxxxx @borghi_claudio @grok Beh, manabe con le sue “previsioni” ha vinto il Nobel per la fisica, il resto lo ha fatto Hasselmann. Però le mie previsioni preferite rimangono quelle di exxon mobill: https://t.co/EDVbOdERVx Per i dati: https://t.co/3wk842ovy9 Serve altro? ☺️
view full postSeptember 21, 2025
4
-
Rob T
@Robhaspatience (Twitter)RT @JsoTony: Great initiative but it’s all so avoidable, the fossil fuel industry knew from the 1950’s that their products were harmful.…
view full postSeptember 20, 2025
1
-
Tony
@JsoTony (Twitter)Great initiative but it’s all so avoidable, the fossil fuel industry knew from the 1950’s that their products were harmful. Greed will kill everyone eventually. https://t.co/oGGUShfQ3Z. https://t.co/eg6KmYTdaj
view full postSeptember 20, 2025
8
1
-
Penny Gowland
@Penny_Gowland (Twitter)@PeterDClack @FreyaZuri @Dallas62130926 Well that isnt what Exxon scientists were thinking in the 1970s. Their predictions turned out to be amazingly good. https://t.co/HN9KzoUlUg And indeed Exxon agrees now. https://t.co/Lp0woHHGDZ
view full postSeptember 14, 2025
1
-
@_Z__ (Twitter)@feelsdesperate The oil industry has known its a very serious problem for decades That's why they themselves have stated that they are now in the business of creating doubt https://t.co/3LYZWWxh94
view full postSeptember 14, 2025
-
Merxe
@NimbleBard48 (Twitter)@Mariano_zcz @bderski Zgadzam się, ludzie mają krótką pamięć. Ale na szczęście trzymamy dane archiwalne by się z nich uczyć. Tak jak naukowcy Exxona przewidywali poziomy CO2 i temperatury w latach 70-tych, tak idziemy tą ścieżką: https://t.co/WLwuXN8xum
view full postSeptember 7, 2025
1
-
Neil Jennings
@NeilRJennings (Twitter)@jemmm85517813 @ClaireCoutinho CO2 is the main driver of recent increases in temps as projected by Exxon Mobil back in 1982 - they predicted future demand for fossil fuels, increased CO2 and associated impact on temps. Difficult to have been so accurate if CO2 has no effect on climate: https://t.co/J4T7uOvOhb
view full postSeptember 5, 2025
1
-
Cecilia
@CeciliaOberhol2 (Twitter)@harrisp72 @bigkiitten https://t.co/iZ4M6zrs5Y https://t.co/LOZdIjyRgu
view full postSeptember 4, 2025
-
Michael Merrifield
@AstroMikeMerri (Twitter)@jbf789 @MatthewWielicki No they aren’t. https://t.co/K5IrG00Eaz
view full postSeptember 4, 2025
-
Toms_wszystko_jest_a_potem_znika
@JEgoZUS (Twitter)@skonfundowanhuj Zadania jak zwykle są podzielone
view full postSeptember 3, 2025
-
Michael Merrifield
@AstroMikeMerri (Twitter)@ChrisMartzWX The red-team-versus-blue-team nonsense is the classic appeal to meretricious balance made by those seeking to obfuscate the clarity of science that has, for a long time, been apparent to all, even Exxon. https://t.co/K5IrG00Eaz
view full postSeptember 3, 2025
2
-
Altmetric
@altmetric.com (Bluesky)Sentiment for this on Twitter is almost unanimously positive, but check out the negative sentiment found here; notice that it's supportive of the research, but negative in tone. You can identify combative allies using sentiment analysis. It is worth knowing who is fighting for science.
view full postSeptember 2, 2025
4
1
-
Altmetric
@altmetric.com (Bluesky)Here's a striking example in climate change research. In 2023, Naomi Oreskes, who wrote Merchants of Doubt (that turned into a great film) published "Assessing ExxonMobil's Global Warming Projections". You can find the original article here #ClimateSky www.science.org/doi/epdf/10....
view full postSeptember 2, 2025
2
1
-
Joe8855
@joe51du (Twitter)@paddysaidingbar @CCross1776 @Royalacresrod @peblackstock @Gilles_Borghese @KellMorrHK @OscarsWild1 @kennetham12 @Fossil_Herb @BobPartridge16 @benmooreau @Konrad_Chapman @craigthomler @Milei_InEnglish @M3othra012 @nalonjack @ScienceBlog3 @smeemartin @MichaelCastill2 @WeRone777 @insane_voice Exxon had climate models that were made public.This is solid evidence. https://t.co/h0YoBbHFyt
view full postAugust 27, 2025
-
That Was Then This Is Now
@TWTThisIsNow (Twitter)@tom_wheeling @adlrope @MatthewWielicki Even Exxon’s scientists predicted global warming via AGW modeling with impressive accuracy decades ago. https://t.co/M6wHhuxsl5 And seriously, I asked you to tell us "What is a woman?" before you asked me, sport. You won't answer either, because you're just here to troll.
view full postAugust 27, 2025
2
-
Andreas Fuchs
@Andreas75269170 (Twitter)@marcfriedrich7 https://t.co/8wPpJOc4XB
view full postAugust 27, 2025
-
Andreas Fuchs
@Andreas75269170 (Twitter)@solarpapst Über Klima-Wissenschaftler sollte man nicht lästern. Weil man so seine Unwissenheit zeigt. Weil: die Erdöl Industrie intern zu denselben Prognosen gekommen ist! https://t.co/8wPpJOc4XB
view full postAugust 27, 2025
1
-
Andreas Fuchs
@Andreas75269170 (Twitter)@FraukePetry Sind Sie sicher....? https://t.co/8wPpJOc4XB
view full postAugust 25, 2025
-
p
@p374869 (Twitter)@jakubwiech Najlepsze jest to, że faktycznie były badania, które były ukrywane bo były niewygodne dla potężnych korporacji. https://t.co/zTbADaHvvG
view full postAugust 25, 2025
-
Toms_wszystko_jest_a_potem_znika
@JEgoZUS (Twitter)@Gabriel02255244 https://t.co/CdGXz3OxCu.
view full postAugust 22, 2025
-
illep
@_illep (Twitter)@StefanoSdenegri @LaBombetta76 @FrancescoTsla @LeonardoPanetta Grossomodo il 100%, e su sta cosa c’è praticamente l’unanimità da decenni. Già negli anni ‘70 exxon parlava di che impatto avrebbero avuto i loro prodotti sul clima. E avevano ragione da vendere. https://t.co/EDVbOdEk5Z
view full postAugust 19, 2025
3
-
Toms_wszystko_jest_a_potem_znika
@JEgoZUS (Twitter)Jeżeli sprawdził się ten ➡️ model "Wewnętrznie raportowany wykres z 1977 r. przedstawiający „efekt CO2" to dlaczego miałby się nie sprawdzić ten ⬇️
view full postAugust 14, 2025
-
Toms_wszystko_jest_a_potem_znika
@JEgoZUS (Twitter)@Piotr_u55 Masz Piotrze, podyskutuj z tym
view full postAugust 14, 2025
1
-
That Was Then This Is Now
@TWTThisIsNow (Twitter)@bbbaldie @ChrisGloninger @MatthewWielicki As for CO2-driven global warming predictions, again even Exxon's scientists predicted global warming with an impressive degree of accuracy decades ago - 1982 to be exact. https://t.co/M6wHhuxsl5
view full postAugust 12, 2025
-
Électron Libre
@Nathali37468405 (Twitter)@ExxonMobil_FRA @TotalEnergies @Shell ont instrumentalisé l’incertitude et financé le climatoscepticisme Charbon, pétrole, gaz .. les combustibles fossiles sont responsables à 75 % des émissions de gaz à effet de serre qui réchauffe notre planète #canicule https://t.co/11ml5YbT9X
view full postAugust 12, 2025
-
YogiSan GbR
@YOGISAN_shop (Twitter)@HinrichHan43736 @i_am_fabs Industrie wusste es: Exxon-Modelle prognostizierten die Erwärmung seit den 70ern ziemlich genau. Öffentlich gab’s mit dreckigen Millionen finanzierte Zweifel-PR. https://t.co/imI9HUEpoP
view full postAugust 12, 2025
-
Shtoops
@Shtoopsed (Twitter)@SunTzuNorth @JasonPYYC Exxon Mobil sure seems to have thought it was real since at least 1977. They seem to have predicted it incredibly well too. https://t.co/SGytI44lxz https://t.co/YUHhhQk01s
view full postAugust 11, 2025
2
-
Xitty Logo
@___F____U___ (Twitter)@themensclubcoin @LacieInBloom @redsnoopy69 Tell Exxon that. https://t.co/hzpq6obQF2
view full postAugust 11, 2025
-
Xitty Logo
@___F____U___ (Twitter)@DonTheFurious1 @JasonPYYC Exxon’s studies from decades ago had the exact opposite effect. They’ve done everything possible to squash what they predicted themselves so their profits wouldn’t be impacted. https://t.co/hzpq6obiPu
view full postAugust 11, 2025
4
-
That Was Then This Is Now
@TWTThisIsNow (Twitter)@red_standing @simonmaechling Even Exxon’s scientists predicted current global warming with impressive accuracy decades ago. https://t.co/M6wHhuxsl5
view full postAugust 9, 2025
1
-
Progressive Rants
@ProgRantsPod (Twitter)@oloughlj Would you like... more of them? https://t.co/tSqDAHlE87 https://t.co/WAUvhWHeLp https://t.co/c4l8kLpLQC https://t.co/WyYD7BBq9D https://t.co/RNB7sU06ih https://t.co/IKJGivB0Wz Any of those will do, sport.
view full postAugust 8, 2025
-
That Was Then This Is Now
@TWTThisIsNow (Twitter)@RCowley185R @mesoepi @John_On_Climate @PeterDClack @NOAA Even Exxon’s scientists predicted global warming via AGW modeling with impressive accuracy decades ago. https://t.co/M6wHhuxsl5
view full postAugust 8, 2025
-
giuseppina
@giuppi_19 (Twitter)@EhmTEhf @MelissaLMRogers If you think it’s all fake, explain why ExxonMobil’s internal models predicted temperature rises better than NASA: https://t.co/nuZNO6cwz6
view full postAugust 6, 2025
-
Stinkhorn
@Stinkhorn11 (Twitter)@Kenneth19567057 @ejwwest @25_cycle @JimBowersclimb @TimAllmanWriter Who were the"political masters" of the Exxon scientists who made their own independent predictions of global warming? Maybe oil companies don't fund climate science because they have learned their lesson. Safer to fund activists instead. https://t.co/ecqVr2tyBZ
view full postAugust 5, 2025
3
-
Bren
@bren_geo (Twitter)@aaronshem @JVinos_Climate @BenBos1302 @paws101 Here’s the entire review your figures come from, to appt context: https://t.co/4BGdQinrb8
view full postAugust 4, 2025
-
Xitty Logo
@___F____U___ (Twitter)@ChrisMartzWX Get a load of these cranks predictions. They were such fear mongering libs they spent billions trying to NOT convince you. https://t.co/hzpq6obiPu
view full postAugust 3, 2025
-
That Was Then This Is Now
@TWTThisIsNow (Twitter)@TheTweetDawg @Dallas62130926 @RogerCoppock Meanwhile back on planet earth, even Exxon’s scientists predicted global warming via AGW modeling with impressive accuracy decades ago. https://t.co/M6wHhuxsl5
view full postAugust 3, 2025
-
Against Injustice
@Always_United11 (Twitter)RT @TrackOilPACs: @SecretaryWright @elonmusk, hey here is your buddy wasting taxpayer $ on settled science. “Our analysis shows that sinc…
view full postAugust 2, 2025
1
-
Oil PAC Tracker
@TrackOilPACs (Twitter)@SecretaryWright @elonmusk, hey here is your buddy wasting taxpayer $ on settled science. “Our analysis shows that since the late 1970s and early 1980s, ExxonMobil scientists (i) accurately projected and skillfully modeled global warming due to fossil fuel burning.” https://t.co/sSUiwoRyjj
view full postAugust 1, 2025
13
1
-
Rasputin
@RTaion (Twitter)@SSolemed @AndreasBrandt17 @Deu_Kurier Lese mal lieber die ExxonMobil Studien von 1972
view full postJuly 30, 2025
-
illep
@_illep (Twitter)@embonaccorso @FM_Ziggy Toh tieni, questo è il modello di Exxon Mobill, vai a battere cassa magari un bicchiere di benzina te lo regalano. https://t.co/EDVbOdERVx
view full postJuly 30, 2025
1
-
icarus62
@icarus62 (Twitter)RT @icarus62: @PeterDClack Industries have known for many decades in private, but denied in public, that fossil fuel combustion would cause…
view full postJuly 28, 2025
3
-
Panzerbaer21
@Panzerbaer21 (Twitter)RT @EnlightenStS: @systemnutte @jenny_nass26 Yup. Beschrieben z.B. in "Assessing ExxonMobil’s global warming projections", Science, 2023
view full postJuly 27, 2025
1
-
Marcinmusz
@Martimar12345 (Twitter)@PatrickDalroy12 @Neuropa_ Ale podaj konkretne przykłady i przytocz dowody. Ja tobie podam wyznawców prawicowego lysenkizmu https://t.co/wBpIxNHm9s https://t.co/MPa5S3S5T9 https://t.co/mOzkxirW8R https://t.co/uj7Fhgjh8N.
view full postJuly 25, 2025
-
fool sufferer
@DefenestrationH (Twitter)@A_F_Laverdiere @LeonSimons8 It's far more plausible that you're getting paid (or are a useful idiot) to repeat the same denial nonsense peddled by the oil lobby. My theory actually has a clear profit motive https://t.co/2a8I8ZbGCR
view full postJuly 24, 2025
-
Shalom Aleichem
@ShalomAlei11874 (Twitter)@mwt2008 @cmd_alt_delete @MatthewWielicki @grok what methodological flaws and ideological bias appear in the study "Assessing ExxonMobil’s global warming projections"?
view full postJuly 22, 2025
-
Stephan Schulz
@EnlightenStS (Twitter)@systemnutte @jenny_nass26 Yup. Beschrieben z.B. in "Assessing ExxonMobil’s global warming projections", Science, 2023
view full postJuly 22, 2025
6
1
-
MiteHakUrAccnt
@MiteHakUrAccnt (Twitter)@technowurstbrot @_ClimateCraze Literally models by Exxon scientists predicting what would happen. Not only were the predictions very good, but the handcasts were great too. Until you people tell us why OIL COMPANIES can’t be right, you can’t be trusted. https://t.co/Nu5doETMro
view full postJuly 21, 2025
1
-
MiteHakUrAccnt
@MiteHakUrAccnt (Twitter)@_ClimateCraze Like these Exxon guys, John. So many narratives that all say the same thing with pretty good predictive power Hey, now that you’re gleeful, can you finally put units in that fantastic plot of yours with all the sinusoids? No need to hide the genius now! https://t.co/Nu5doETMro
view full postJuly 20, 2025
-
MiteHakUrAccnt
@MiteHakUrAccnt (Twitter)@_ClimateCraze @Kobehardi How did these folks do John? https://t.co/Nu5doETMro
view full postJuly 20, 2025
-
MiteHakUrAccnt
@MiteHakUrAccnt (Twitter)@rexdelay @_ClimateCraze https://t.co/Nu5doETMro
view full postJuly 20, 2025
1
-
MiteHakUrAccnt
@MiteHakUrAccnt (Twitter)@MarkJan08409037 @_ClimateCraze Exxon is loaded with weak-minded fools who are climate alarmists: https://t.co/Nu5doETMro
view full postJuly 20, 2025
-
MiteHakUrAccnt
@MiteHakUrAccnt (Twitter)@Einzelkampfer2 @_ClimateCraze How about these folks? What do you think of Exxon’s credibility? They pretty much nailed it, huh? https://t.co/Nu5doETMro
view full postJuly 20, 2025
-
MiteHakUrAccnt
@MiteHakUrAccnt (Twitter)@PatrickSSte @_ClimateCraze Yeah, tell me about it. Just look at these totally untrustworthy climate models by Exxon that pretty much nailed the prediction and hi scat’s in what happened. Damn oil companies lying like that. https://t.co/Nu5doETMro
view full postJuly 20, 2025
1
-
MiteHakUrAccnt
@MiteHakUrAccnt (Twitter)@_ClimateCraze https://t.co/Nu5doETMro
view full postJuly 20, 2025
-
Duncan Porter
@misterduncan (Twitter)@periodicaudio @stephen1e4 @balls95652097 @ChrisMartzWX Cherry-picking the Russian model (an outlier) doesn't invalidate the IPCC & Spencer's data has been repeatedly criticised for bias. Observed warming still matches. If the IPCC is a problem, what about Exxon? Their model was accurate 50 years ago: https://t.co/pDdhg1l5Rt
view full postJuly 18, 2025
1
-
Linda Plano
@lindaplano (Twitter)@djreiner @LittleB59019540 @EliotJacobson @grok You must be SUPER interested to learn that Exxon's own scientists predicted today's warming back in the 70's at 0.2 +/- 0.04 C/decade... ...Oh wait, I guess not interested at all since you'd rather quote disinformation than learn, I dunno, anything? https://t.co/ZDqEXuzxSd
view full postJuly 16, 2025
1
-
Annie
@annizary (Twitter)RT @annizary: Assessing ExxonMobil’s global warming projections | Science https://t.co/ZDvUcxvR5j
view full postJuly 16, 2025
1
-
Annie
@annizary (Twitter)Assessing ExxonMobil’s global warming projections | Science https://t.co/ZDvUcxvR5j
view full postJuly 16, 2025
1
1
-
YogiSan GbR
@YOGISAN_shop (Twitter)7️⃣ #Exxons interne Modelle sagten die heutige Erwärmung bereits in den #1970ern ziemlich genau voraus – verschwiegen wurde es trotzdem. https://t.co/imI9HUEpoP
view full postJuly 16, 2025
-
Marc Jones
@MarcEHJones (Twitter)@freetotem @z_zb007 @Mericamemed Even Exxon's relatively simply projection for average global temperature matches current observations. You have clearly been conned by dishonest bloggers. - https://t.co/kHDkflxv8H . https://t.co/EccjSOqCYk .
view full postJuly 15, 2025
6
-
That Was Then This Is Now
@TWTThisIsNow (Twitter)@Nikolaoz @whstancil Meanwhile back on planet earth, even Exxon’s scientists predicted global warming via AGW modeling with impressive accuracy decades ago. https://t.co/M6wHhuxsl5
view full postJuly 15, 2025
3
-
illep
@_illep (Twitter)@nanoscalebiomed Però tieni, un paio di link per iniziare a capire come funzionano le cose: https://t.co/6HOp6aKurk https://t.co/KowJK7dkbF https://t.co/EDVbOdEk5Z https://t.co/fsMgNRhH8c Scommetto che il nesso tra queste cose tu sia perfettamente in grado di trovarlo da solo.
view full postJuly 15, 2025
1
-
Martin Michaelis
@MartMichaelis (Twitter)@E_Boeminghaus Die Klimaprojektionen aus den 1970er waren erstaunlich akkurat... https://t.co/7eKvU8RBHz
view full postJuly 14, 2025
-
Martin Michaelis
@MartMichaelis (Twitter)@E_Boeminghaus Diese Langzeittrends sind auch einfacher als das Wetter der nächsten Wochen. Wissenschaftler haben den Temperaturanstieg in den 1970er Jahren mit hoher Genauigkeit vorhergesagt. https://t.co/7eKvU8RBHz
view full postJuly 13, 2025
4
-
Sylvie M. Coyaud
@OcadiLorenz (Twitter)@Pinperepette @sciasbolo @lucabc @climacritic Perché sarebbero incertezze rilevanti per simulare l'evoluzione della T globale, i.e. l'energia del sistema clima? Nel modello Exxon Mobil, l'anomalia risultava solo dall'aumento della CO2 atm. e rispondeva già alla domanda https://t.co/VDG3D5Jxwq https://t.co/b5SekgVy4v
view full postJuly 12, 2025
-
That Was Then This Is Now
@TWTThisIsNow (Twitter)@LaffingMunkyboy @feelthebern624 @iamAtheistGirl The basic tenet of science is that it’s built on testable hypotheses and evidence. Even Exxon's own research confirmed fossil fuels' role in global warming decades ago. https://t.co/M6wHhuwUvx
view full postJuly 11, 2025
-
Stanford U Huff Post
@Tyroist (Twitter)RT @TWTThisIsNow: @MagnumO28311564 @feelthebern624 @iamAtheistGirl Even Exxon’s scientists predicted global warming via AGW modeling with a…
view full postJuly 11, 2025
1
-
That Was Then This Is Now
@TWTThisIsNow (Twitter)@robert_kliemann @iamAtheistGirl ALL climate scientists agree man-made global warming is a scientific fact. Even Exxon's own research confirmed fossil fuels' role in global warming decades ago. https://t.co/M6wHhuxsl5
view full postJuly 10, 2025
-
That Was Then This Is Now
@TWTThisIsNow (Twitter)@MagnumO28311564 @feelthebern624 @iamAtheistGirl Even Exxon’s scientists predicted global warming via AGW modeling with an impressive degree of accuracy decades ago. Do you really think Exxon's scientists told them "what they wanted to hear"? https://t.co/M6wHhuxsl5
view full postJuly 10, 2025
2
1
-
That Was Then This Is Now
@TWTThisIsNow (Twitter)@EricRussell82 @iamAtheistGirl Indeed. All of the global warming "skeptics" who predicted the end of global warming many years ago are wrong, while even Exxon’s scientists predicted global warming with impressive accuracy via AGW theory decades ago. https://t.co/M6wHhuxsl5
view full postJuly 10, 2025
1
-
Stinkhorn
@Stinkhorn11 (Twitter)@HeyYaNow143 @jetlining @rhcm123 Actually we know why, don't we. Because even when an oil company's own scientists investigate this issue, they come to the same conclusions: https://t.co/ecqVr2tyBZ
view full postJuly 10, 2025
2
-
cdeightsix
@cdeightsix (Twitter)@unrealbobtaylor @TheTNHoller @RepTimBurchett Unironically, they had a part in setting the stage for today's rampant denialism. They knew man-made climate change was real and developed models on par with academic and gov research. Yet they chose to downplay the findings and gaslight the public. https://t.co/T3ZkjQT3ZY
view full postJuly 8, 2025
1
-
Davey
@splugged (Twitter)@ah_ecco @RobertoGiuffre @DanEtti @skdh https://t.co/AQ1qo4Z6HS
view full postJuly 8, 2025
1
-
OPA
@ObservatoireUS (Twitter)@FightCards47 @cwebbonline The average global temperature is trending upward much higher, and faster, than it would naturally. The basic causal mechanism for this has been understood for a long time, as several fossil fuel companies' archives show. https://t.co/EzZwgOvvrH
view full postJuly 6, 2025
-
Aries Corinthier
@AriesCorinthier (Twitter)@alexboge @RichHomieEsh @moultano Its literally on record that oil and manufacturing exects knew about global warming as early as the 70's and paid to bury the information https://t.co/scLmKfnFrb
view full postJuly 6, 2025
-
Davey
@splugged (Twitter)@Pinperepette @MaurizioVoltini @pipcoman Per delineare meglio il mio personalissimo pensiero: non devono pagare i “danni” le persone comuni, zio Peppe con la Panda, per capirci. Devono pagarli chi SAPEVA ed ha taciuto e “oscurato”. Lo sapevano. Almeno dal 1970. https://t.co/xqPszbfmdW
view full postJuly 5, 2025
7
-
illep
@_illep (Twitter)@FHeidolon @rosikone @ildinolib @intuslegens Qui ci sono i modelli di exxon mobill degli anni ‘80 e le valutazioni dei nostri https://t.co/7S1jUv9vXf https://t.co/EDVbOdERVx
view full postJuly 3, 2025
1
-
TimothyMcAll
@timothy_al98128 (Twitter)RT @ClausTahler: @ElefantImRaum2 @IngmarStadelman Warum fragst du nicht Vertreter der Fossil-Industrie woher sie es bereits vor >50 Jahren…
view full postJuly 2, 2025
1
-
Klaus
@ClausTahler (Twitter)@ElefantImRaum2 @IngmarStadelman Warum fragst du nicht Vertreter der Fossil-Industrie woher sie es bereits vor >50 Jahren wussten, dass es eine Krise geben wird? https://t.co/yOnBheHOgA
view full postJuly 2, 2025
11
1
-
Dominika
@DominikaMarta (Twitter)RT @JEgoZUS: Słuchacie denialiści i fani teorii spiskowych. Szukacie prawdy i nie chcecie być oszukiwani, to dlaczego milczcie na temat jed…
view full postJuly 1, 2025
1
-
Toms_wszystko_jest_a_potem_znika
@JEgoZUS (Twitter)Słuchacie denialiści i fani teorii spiskowych. Szukacie prawdy i nie chcecie być oszukiwani, to dlaczego milczcie na temat jednego z większych oszust w dziejach ludzkości. Dlaczego ExxonMobil ukrył modele emiscji CO2 skoro wy uważacie że CO2 nie szkodzi
view full postJuly 1, 2025
4
1
-
Maracroix He / Him / His
@maracroix (Twitter)@drakeknight65 @RichardAngwin @atrupar Exxon knew about climate change: https://t.co/t75w2NyN8k In the 1980s: https://t.co/wArYMuP9t6 Which means you're either a corporate shill or an imbecile. Which is it?
view full postJuly 1, 2025
-
Marc Jones
@MarcEHJones (Twitter)@hal9000xp188961 @volcaholic1 The relationship between atmospheric CO2 and average global temperature is very well understood and that provides more than enough reason to act: - https://t.co/NBBT8RROv4 - https://t.co/f4JMojRXFW - https://t.co/XNRZLnXUwl - https://t.co/eJquug6bYh .
view full postJune 29, 2025
4
-
@imacdee.bsky.social (Bluesky)May 30, 2025
-
Your Climate Guy
@yourclimatenye (Twitter)@averagejoe314 @BritPetroleumPR Instead of warning the public, they funded climate denial groups to delay action. (Source: Oreskes & Supran, 2021)
view full postApril 28, 2025
1
-
Awaken The “I AM” | r/microdosing | Mush Love
@LiveInMushLove (Twitter)RT @LiveInMushLove: Photograph: Supran, et al., 2023, “Assessing ExxonMobil’s global warming projections” https://t.co/ry2b3FgHnu
view full postApril 19, 2025
1
-
Atomsk's Sanakan
@AtomsksSanakan (Twitter)@RogerCoppock @Anvndarnamn5 @kevhof52 @Robert76907841 @Konrad_Chapman @kissingtruth @jemmm85517813 @patfrank830 @CyfraithEcocide @DaleGribble_666 @AutumnMandrake @TMGFlorida @PoyetPatrice @idummkopp @priscian @MusicFrom90 @Proemed45 @MarcEHJones @Rebecca74083947 @25_cycle @NdabaningiMoyo @Visitor51171015 @rwerkh @DoubleDumas @COrepKdeGraaf @ejwwest @greenartdf @zebedeem @BennoList @Willard1951 @LxxResearcher @waynejv1973 @VoteBlueUrban @military_1776 @TWTThisIsNow @BrknMan @RCownie @ICcrapdaily @ClimateRetorts @CymaticWave @DarrenDrpage @SGMTrailbuilder @MarkOgge @JrmeBrwnCt @TheDisproof @judithcallagha9 @psud12 When one accounts for non-CO2 forcings, one ends up with a TCR of closer to 2K per doubling, instead of 3K. https://t.co/A4XwBfw3Ui https://t.co/Ejc8gNhj90 https://t.co/5ZC28IgzLk https://t.co/dTWqiirAWY https://t.co/JUifGnDzl0 https://t.co/qhZA7aQAt2 https://t.co/tcaNe36zPX ht
view full postFebruary 7, 2025
2
-
James William Owens
@Willard1951 (Twitter)@patfrank830 @AtomsksSanakan @PoyetPatrice @idummkopp @Konrad_Chapman @JamesWest12 @TMGFlorida @AutumnMandrake @priscian @MusicFrom90 @kissingtruth @kevhof52 @Proemed45 @Robert76907841 @MarcEHJones @Rebecca74083947 @25_cycle @NdabaningiMoyo @Visitor51171015 @rwerkh @DoubleDumas @Anvndarnamn5 @COrepKdeGraaf @DaleGribble_666 @ejwwest @greenartdf @zebedeem @BennoList @LxxResearcher @waynejv1973 @VoteBlueUrban @jemmm85517813 @military_1776 @TWTThisIsNow @BrknMan @RCownie @ICcrapdaily @ClimateRetorts @CymaticWave @DarrenDrpage @SGMTrailbuilder @CyfraithEcocide @MarkOgge @SteB777 @JrmeBrwnCt @TheDisproof @judithcallagha9 @psud12 Pat, that's Figure 1C in the Supran et al 2023 look at the internal Exxon documents (in this case an Exxon doc from 1977) from their scientists working on projecting climate You and others can check, part even shows up from the doi (lower right) https://t.co/orNZnISI9E
view full postFebruary 4, 2025
4
-
Rasputin
@RTaion (Twitter)@maikpi70 An Exxon projection even correctly predicted 1977 that the use of fossil fuels would cause "climate change" https://t.co/Ly8CVfnvFb Assessing ExxonMobil’s global warming projections https://t.co/ysO2328UAc https://t.co/wmWfUDBHEz
view full postFebruary 1, 2025
1
-
@heroesatwork
@heroesatwork (Twitter)RT @HuiaSue: Assessing ExxonMobil’s global warming projections: #BigOil #Koch #AtlasNetwork & #Project2025 https://t.co/fYRLth6RKI
view full postJanuary 21, 2025
4
-
MaoriGirl
@HelenaT57230672 (Twitter)RT @HuiaSue: Assessing ExxonMobil’s global warming projections: #BigOil #Koch #AtlasNetwork & #Project2025 https://t.co/fYRLth6RKI
view full postJanuary 21, 2025
4
-
Sue Pugmire
@HuiaSue (Twitter)Assessing ExxonMobil’s global warming projections https://t.co/fYRLth6RKI https://t.co/ortm6o1qS3
view full postJanuary 21, 2025
-
JO – #ToitūTeTiriti Aotearoa!❤️
@JOMcFadyen (Twitter)RT @HuiaSue: Assessing ExxonMobil’s global warming projections: #BigOil #Koch #AtlasNetwork & #Project2025 https://t.co/fYRLth6RKI
view full postJanuary 21, 2025
4
-
Barb
@Barb59967443593 (Twitter)RT @HuiaSue: Assessing ExxonMobil’s global warming projections: #BigOil #Koch #AtlasNetwork & #Project2025 https://t.co/fYRLth6RKI
view full postJanuary 21, 2025
4
-
Sue Pugmire
@HuiaSue (Twitter)Assessing ExxonMobil’s global warming projections: #BigOil #Koch #AtlasNetwork & #Project2025 https://t.co/fYRLth6RKI
view full postJanuary 21, 2025
6
4
-
The Reconing Hub - Unmasking Privilege
@Fixdasissdem (Twitter)Assessing ExxonMobil’s global warming projections | Science https://t.co/go2SHcPJki @exxonmobil Another unaccountable, “free market” mold spore on our species. @UNFCCC It’s funny how big energy totes the Free Market Economics as science yet ignores, well, actual science.
view full postJanuary 4, 2025
-
Luis Rodriguez-M
@LuisrManz (Twitter)Assessing ExxonMobil’s global warming projections | Science https://t.co/9iEXGNKC8j
view full postNovember 14, 2024
-
ありーちぇ
@ALC_V (Twitter)Assessing ExxonMobil’s global warming projections | Science https://t.co/kVpBkZzRsl 化石燃料企業のひとつであるエクソンモービルが、独立した学術的・政府的モデルによる予測と一致する温暖化予測モデルを社内に持っていたことを明らかにしている。
view full postNovember 13, 2024
-
GreenpeacePortsmouth
@GP_Portsmouth (Twitter)Assessing ExxonMobil’s global warming projections | Science https://t.co/Obuf5e9ugW
view full postSeptember 4, 2024
-
Atomsk's Sanakan
@AtomsksSanakan (Twitter)@hausfath @red_standing Random question, if you're willing + have time: What would be the implied TCR for observed warming for 2000-2023? I think 2000-2023 forcing is here: https://t.co/O5CkIJitSk So basically similar to these: https://t.co/Ejc8gNgLjs https://t.co/A4XwBfvw4K https://t.co/X3hi0kh6T7
view full postAugust 7, 2024
1
-
Atomsk's Sanakan
@AtomsksSanakan (Twitter)Even including forcings other than CO2, the post-2000 trend would be ≥1.5°C of non-equilibrium warming per doubling of CO2. Still larger than Shaviv's proposed equilibrium trend. https://t.co/A4XwBfvw4K [https://t.co/O5CkIJitSk] https://t.co/Ejc8gNgLjs https://t.co/4u0QkLqpRi
view full postAugust 7, 2024
1
-
Patrice POYET
@PoyetPatrice (Twitter)@EdWellham @LxxResearcher @BoryanLeChat @BrknMan @ejwwest @alangnixon @kissingtruth @ICcrapdaily @Konrad_Chapman @FredHikes @NdabaningiMoyo @TWTThisIsNow @AtomsksSanakan @GlonvecHQ @CymaticWave @BarbaraGirouard @WHPAAD @DoubleDumas @Willard1951 @patfrank830 @Pow_Pop_Blam @ClimateRetorts @mic12052 @covid_quest @MLiebreich @DarrenDrpage @DeadheadJP99 @agentsinaction @Wim_Ondewhybak_ @Frnc_prep @MartinJBern @hairymarx1 @priscian @HeidlerNeal @ericonthetrail @bobathon @Dooderoo @DuosEquis @25_cycle @WHUT @cohler @JoernWiedemann @Redoubtably10 @BStarr96522 @GeraldKutney @OceanadeSilva @Bazthebemused @USAMRIID_CA @Robert76907841 @FriedrichFiles Geoffrey Supran, Stefan Rahmstorf and Naomi Oreskes (2023) "Assessing ExxonMobil’s global warming projections" is a disgrace to the scientific method (and to intelligence). Science (journal) is one more time discredited after that. https://t.co/iEYPki9k
view full postAugust 4, 2024
2
-
James William Owens
@Willard1951 (Twitter)@patfrank830 @BoryanLeChat @PoyetPatrice @BarbaraGirouard @kissingtruth @AtomsksSanakan @LxxResearcher @GlonvecHQ @ICcrapdaily @CymaticWave @TWTThisIsNow @WHPAAD @DoubleDumas @alangnixon @BrknMan @Pow_Pop_Blam @ClimateRetorts @mic12052 @covid_quest @FredHikes @ejwwest @MLiebreich @DarrenDrpage @DeadheadJP99 @agentsinaction @Wim_Ondewhybak_ @Konrad_Chapman @Frnc_prep @MartinJBern @hairymarx1 @priscian @HeidlerNeal @ericonthetrail @bobathon @Dooderoo @DuosEquis @25_cycle @WHUT @cohler @JoernWiedemann @Redoubtably10 @BStarr96522 @GeraldKutney @OceanadeSilva @Bazthebemused @USAMRIID_CA @Robert76907841 @FriedrichFiles @BatcaveSlimer The basic physics and chemistry that Exxon used to model increases in temperature from rising greenhouse gases was correct Supran et al 'Assessing ExxonMobil's global warming projections' Science v379 eabk0063 2023 https://t.co/orNZnISI9E
view full postJuly 29, 2024
6
-
p/dubz
@pdubl22 (Twitter)@skdh Assessing ExxonMobil’s global warming projections from the late 70’s / early 80’s. https://t.co/kynCPW630Y
view full postJuly 9, 2024
-
Bobbyjo Sing
@bobbyjo_sing (Twitter)RT @RusselNorman: Oil companies told the public there was serious uncertainty about climate science. But their internal research from the 1…
view full postJuly 3, 2024
28
-
Suzanne Pierce
@PierceSuzanne (Twitter)RT @RusselNorman: Oil companies told the public there was serious uncertainty about climate science. But their internal research from the 1…
view full postJuly 3, 2024
28
-
VernonTaurima
@VernsCave (Twitter)RT @RusselNorman: Oil companies told the public there was serious uncertainty about climate science. But their internal research from the 1…
view full postJuly 3, 2024
28
-
pasrom
@pasr0m (Twitter)RT @HGrunbichler: Österreichische Kleingeistigkeit par excellance vs. Wissenschaftlichkeit: Assessing ExxonMobil’s global warming projectio…
view full postJuly 3, 2024
1
-
Hannes Grünbichler
@HGrunbichler (Twitter)Österreichische Kleingeistigkeit par excellance vs. Wissenschaftlichkeit: Assessing ExxonMobil’s global warming projections. Abb. aus https://t.co/kh1EJki1Be. https://t.co/rQe6rDEIA6 https://t.co/T7w3znCBuA
view full postJuly 3, 2024
4
1
-
Ko Ess Ahau ❤️
@essigna (Twitter)RT @RusselNorman: Oil companies told the public there was serious uncertainty about climate science. But their internal research from the 1…
view full postJuly 3, 2024
28
-
❤️
@OceanisBeiLish (Twitter)RT @RusselNorman: Oil companies told the public there was serious uncertainty about climate science. But their internal research from the 1…
view full postJuly 3, 2024
28
-
Sue Pugmire
@HuiaSue (Twitter)RT @RusselNorman: Oil companies told the public there was serious uncertainty about climate science. But their internal research from the 1…
view full postJuly 3, 2024
28
-
A Vogue - Mana ki te Iwi! (Power to the People)
@a_vogue (Twitter)RT @RusselNorman: Oil companies told the public there was serious uncertainty about climate science. But their internal research from the 1…
view full postJuly 3, 2024
28
-
Ko Elizabeth ahau woke af
@black13830 (Twitter)RT @RusselNorman: Oil companies told the public there was serious uncertainty about climate science. But their internal research from the 1…
view full postJuly 3, 2024
28
-
Penguin
@Penguinchanel (Twitter)RT @RusselNorman: Oil companies told the public there was serious uncertainty about climate science. But their internal research from the 1…
view full postJuly 3, 2024
28
-
Susann - Not my PM
@Susann02538863 (Twitter)RT @RusselNorman: Oil companies told the public there was serious uncertainty about climate science. But their internal research from the 1…
view full postJuly 3, 2024
28
-
EatSleepFutball
@EatSleepFutBall (Twitter)RT @RusselNorman: Oil companies told the public there was serious uncertainty about climate science. But their internal research from the 1…
view full postJuly 3, 2024
28
-
JO – #ToitūTeTiriti Aotearoa!❤️
@JOMcFadyen (Twitter)RT @RusselNorman: Oil companies told the public there was serious uncertainty about climate science. But their internal research from the 1…
view full postJuly 2, 2024
28
-
Alistair Gunn
@a_son_of_a_gunn (Twitter)RT @RusselNorman: Oil companies told the public there was serious uncertainty about climate science. But their internal research from the 1…
view full postJuly 2, 2024
28
-
lululemon
@locococo1905 (Twitter)RT @RusselNorman: Oil companies told the public there was serious uncertainty about climate science. But their internal research from the 1…
view full postJuly 2, 2024
28
-
Climate Voter
@ClimateVoterNZ (Twitter)RT @RusselNorman: Oil companies told the public there was serious uncertainty about climate science. But their internal research from the 1…
view full postJuly 2, 2024
28
-
Janni Janni
@jan_lattie (Twitter)RT @RusselNorman: Oil companies told the public there was serious uncertainty about climate science. But their internal research from the 1…
view full postJuly 2, 2024
28
-
Pauli - LyingTruth
@PauliLyingTruth (Twitter)RT @RusselNorman: Oil companies told the public there was serious uncertainty about climate science. But their internal research from the 1…
view full postJuly 2, 2024
28
-
Tim Gow
@OrganicFarmerNZ (Twitter)RT @RusselNorman: Oil companies told the public there was serious uncertainty about climate science. But their internal research from the 1…
view full postJuly 2, 2024
28
-
LTahuri
@LillianTahuri (Twitter)RT @RusselNorman: Oil companies told the public there was serious uncertainty about climate science. But their internal research from the 1…
view full postJuly 2, 2024
28
-
Linda B.
@Lindabchimpee (Twitter)RT @RusselNorman: Oil companies told the public there was serious uncertainty about climate science. But their internal research from the 1…
view full postJuly 2, 2024
28
-
Jjengar
@Jjengar (Twitter)RT @RusselNorman: Oil companies told the public there was serious uncertainty about climate science. But their internal research from the 1…
view full postJuly 2, 2024
28
-
tadhg stopford
@tstopford (Twitter)RT @RusselNorman: Oil companies told the public there was serious uncertainty about climate science. But their internal research from the 1…
view full postJuly 2, 2024
28
-
jake
@Papaioeajake (Twitter)RT @RusselNorman: Oil companies told the public there was serious uncertainty about climate science. But their internal research from the 1…
view full postJuly 2, 2024
28
-
PHIL
@phil86537482 (Twitter)RT @RusselNorman: Oil companies told the public there was serious uncertainty about climate science. But their internal research from the 1…
view full postJuly 2, 2024
28
-
Aotearoa with No PLan(et) B
@miguelnz (Twitter)RT @RusselNorman: Oil companies told the public there was serious uncertainty about climate science. But their internal research from the 1…
view full postJuly 2, 2024
28
-
Kea
@Earworm_nz (Twitter)RT @RusselNorman: Oil companies told the public there was serious uncertainty about climate science. But their internal research from the 1…
view full postJuly 2, 2024
28
-
Dave Q
@Dave_Q (Twitter)RT @RusselNorman: Oil companies told the public there was serious uncertainty about climate science. But their internal research from the 1…
view full postJuly 2, 2024
28
-
Nick Young
@nickofnz (Twitter)RT @RusselNorman: Oil companies told the public there was serious uncertainty about climate science. But their internal research from the 1…
view full postJuly 2, 2024
28
-
Russel Norman
@RusselNorman (Twitter)Oil companies told the public there was serious uncertainty about climate science. But their internal research from the 1970s showed the opposite, and has been pretty accurate: Assessing ExxonMobil’s global warming projections https://t.co/7XY9m48PnE
view full postJuly 2, 2024
61
28
-
Tash
@ZaffranRiver (Twitter)RT @RaveCozensHardy: @spudulike1965 @DaleVince @LordWalney If you want to understand what actual scientists were saying: In “Assessing Exxo…
view full postMay 16, 2024
1
-
Raven Cozens-Hardy
@RaveCozensHardy (Twitter)@spudulike1965 @DaleVince @LordWalney If you want to understand what actual scientists were saying: In “Assessing ExxonMobil’s Global Warming Projections,” researchers from Harvard and the Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research https://t.co/9ZXUwT085B As opposed to fake news idiots like Epstein.
view full postMay 16, 2024
1
1
-
Birdseye1
@Birdseye1 (Twitter)RT @Birdseye1: @ruxcytbl @FChecker76 @Forsolace @Seniorveteran @LetFuryHaveThe1 @306ismyfavnum @TheWreckingBal5 @garygreno @durandundee7105…
view full postMay 15, 2024
1
-
Birdseye1
@Birdseye1 (Twitter)@ruxcytbl @FChecker76 @Forsolace @Seniorveteran @LetFuryHaveThe1 @306ismyfavnum @TheWreckingBal5 @garygreno @durandundee7105 @sandraclunie @Trump @MichaelRapaport @seniorvet @OfficialFBOP @aaas @theNASEM @PNASNews @AEI @SenTuberville @NOAA @ScienceMagazine "Assessing ExxonMobil’s global warming projections" https://t.co/jCka6x1K6P
view full postMay 14, 2024
1
-
Scott McLarty
@ScottTMcLarty (Twitter)@CaseColo @briebriejoy ExxonMobil knows that climate change caused by fossil fuels is real. They knew it back in the 1970s. "Assessing ExxonMobil’s global warming projections" G. Supran et al., Science, Jan. 13, 2023 https://t.co/OZbigAP8Pj
view full postApril 20, 2024
3
-
Urs Enz
@hrzcamper (Twitter)@zauberberg188 2/2 Assessing ExxonMobil’s global warming projections Kann man hier nachlesen und dann überlegen, ob das IPCC lügt… https://t.co/nUBvKluow4
view full postMarch 30, 2024
-
Crape
@crape711 (Twitter)@jeffleb89495079 @CrimsonxxMana @markianrubin @RespecterTrail @C_Kavanagh Here's another paper, this time looking at how accurate Exxon's internal climate change reports from the 70s were in predicting the 90s, 2000s, 2010s, and early 2020s. Spoiler, shockingly accurate given their nature as pre-computer models (https://t.co/QqEs5JkQBc)
view full postMarch 22, 2024
-
Dr Gabriel Rau
@hydrogeoscience (Twitter)@FrankfurtZack @HolzheuStefan Ach Zackig ... Weißt du was? Selbst deine besten Freunde der Ölkonzerne wussten bereits vor Jahrzehnten was passieren wird. Schon komisch, gell? https://t.co/krgbcx5Wsm Assessing ExxonMobil’s global warming projections
view full postMarch 1, 2024
-
Atomsk's Sanakan
@AtomsksSanakan (Twitter)@aaronshem @priscian @JimBowersclimb @curryja That paper shows the modeled warming trend is ~20% larger than observations, not the ~50% you claimed. You've been shown that multiple times, so you can stop pretending. https://t.co/LsYpAcQaEG https://t.co/2peJQoMEIJ https://t.co/sj9RsViEfr https://t.co/Ejc8gNgLjs https://t.co/NTXwOjLTi9
view full postFebruary 29, 2024
1
-
Atomsk's Sanakan
@AtomsksSanakan (Twitter)@aaronshem @priscian @JimBowersclimb @curryja You don't know what the modeled trend is. You instead just look at one start-point + one end-point. But that won't tell you the trend because this is not a straight line: https://t.co/Ejc8gNgLjs https://t.co/mE8Aobncvp
view full postFebruary 29, 2024
1
-
Atomsk's Sanakan
@AtomsksSanakan (Twitter)@aaronshem @priscian @JimBowersclimb @curryja @ClimateOfGavin Again, one does not determine a trend (or "rate") by looking at only the start-point and end-point. Yet that's what you tried to do. The projected rate was not ~50% larger than observations. https://t.co/lYWQS90Gi6 https://t.co/Ejc8gNgLjs https://t.co/9d9ADFRh0i
view full postFebruary 29, 2024
-
Atomsk's Sanakan
@AtomsksSanakan (Twitter)@aaronshem @priscian @JimBowersclimb @curryja One doesn't determine *trend* by only looking at the start-point and the end-point. https://t.co/Oc2IuVBkAi https://t.co/Ejc8gNgLjs https://t.co/7i5CnVUlkr
view full postFebruary 29, 2024
-
Atomsk's Sanakan
@AtomsksSanakan (Twitter)@aaronshem @priscian @JimBowersclimb @curryja No, what's fake is the notion you promoted that hydroxychloroquine works for SARS-CoV-2, non-expert contrarian ideologue. Anyway, let folks know when you've learned how to calculate a *trend*. https://t.co/3lazEMtemF https://t.co/Ejc8gNgLjs https://t.co/VTx3kAjV5V
view full postFebruary 29, 2024
1
-
Atomsk's Sanakan
@AtomsksSanakan (Twitter)@priscian @aaronshem @JimBowersclimb @curryja Though the Glaser 1982 implied TCR estimate (i.e. shorter-term climate sensitivity) was less accurate than work from the IPCC + from other climate modeling in the academic literature. https://t.co/Ejc8gNgLjs https://t.co/A4XwBfvw4K https://t.co/69jv9p3YA5
view full postFebruary 29, 2024
2
-
Atomsk's Sanakan
@AtomsksSanakan (Twitter)@priscian @aaronshem @JimBowersclimb @curryja That 'Exxon' analysis looks like figure 3 of Glaser 1982 (page 7): https://t.co/1PdLKGQa7h Observed warming and CO2 increases were a bit less than projected. https://t.co/Ejc8gNgLjs https://t.co/7ZAu2B3Clq
view full postFebruary 29, 2024
1
-
Millard Fillmore White House Library
@FillmoreWhite (Twitter)Oil companies saw it coming, but didn’t sound any alarm. Assessing ExxonMobil’s global warming projections | Science https://t.co/wooYrZTg71
view full postFebruary 9, 2024
-
{nycIDgirl}
@nycidgirl (Twitter)Assessing ExxonMobil’s global warming projections | Science what the F https://t.co/t7I2JCSPuw
view full postFebruary 5, 2024
-
Judy Toronchuk
@realjudyt (Twitter)Assessing ExxonMobil’s global warming projections | Science https://t.co/XfzDvFGp9S
view full postFebruary 1, 2024
-
Atomsk's Sanakan
@AtomsksSanakan (Twitter)@IanISSawesome @joshlbrooks @curryja @NilsTillander @ejwwest @MichaelEMann @GeraldKutney @MatthewWielicki @maxinthevalley @jordanbpeterson Again, go do your homework. "climate models published over the past five decades were generally quite accurate in predicting global warming in the years after publication" https://t.co/Isj3TCoPS8 https://t.co/Ejc8gNgLjs https://t.co/zaQIY3NwSl https://t.co/PfrarWZh4B https://t.co/Wd0Kuof00w
view full postJanuary 24, 2024
-
Ayesha Tandon
@AyeshaTandon (Twitter)2⃣ Assessing ExxonMobil's global warming projections by @GeoffreySupran et al This study reveals that oil company ExxonMobil “knew as much as academic and government scientists knew" about global warming decades ago, but they "worked to deny it”. https://t.co/c6ADFlZM21
view full postJanuary 10, 2024
3
-
Rudi Rotfahrer
@rudirotfahrer (Twitter)RT @JoergAltSJ: •BBC (2022) Big Oil vs the World tells the40 year story of how the oil industry delayed action on climate change https://t.…
view full postDecember 28, 2023
1
-
Jörg Alt SJ #JesuitundStraftäter
@JoergAltSJ (Twitter)•BBC (2022) Big Oil vs the World tells the40 year story of how the oil industry delayed action on climate change https://t.co/KLBhvEYoKp •Supran, G., Oreskes, N., Rahmstorf, S. (2023): Assessing ExxonMobil’s global warming projections. Science https://t.co/hh6buToeRf
view full postDecember 20, 2023
7
1
-
Infopoint #Klimawandel #Artensterben
@infopointa.bsky.social (Bluesky)Exxon Knew
view full postDecember 8, 2023
1
-
Infopoint #Klimawandel #Artensterben
@infopointa.bsky.social (Bluesky)Reminder: Exxon Knew❗
view full postDecember 8, 2023
3
3
-
Alisa Bokulich
@alisabokulich.bsky.social (Bluesky)"The company that will become Exxon bragging about supplying enough energy to melt 7 million tons of glacier every day. Circa 1970s" (from altext) & @naomioreskes.bsky.social et al 2023 paper "Assessing ExxonMobil’s global warming projections" www.science.org/doi/10.1126/... #STS #histsci
view full postOctober 21, 2023
159
79
-
Labrys of Aëlla
@aellalabrys.bsky.social (Bluesky)Exxon knew about the consequences of fossil energy sources since 1977. Instead of living up to their responsibility, a huge worldwide climate denier network was built up. 'Assessing ExxonMobil’s global warming projections' www.science.org/doi/10.1126/...
view full postOctober 9, 2023
21
16
-
Laurent Davidoff
@LaurentDavidoff (Twitter)(janvier 2023) 'Assessing ExxonMobil’s global warming projections' : https://t.co/SOF6DpBngQ https://t.co/FNq52va3m8
view full postSeptember 12, 2023
-
lowkeyGPT
@lowkeyGPT (Twitter)@AISafetyMemes Exxon predicted climate change and plowed ahead anyway. All of the evidence says markets can't be trusted to solve this. https://t.co/IVFoo7kx8z
view full postSeptember 10, 2023
3
-
Dr. Guillaume & le Voyage de Darwin
@voyagedarwinbeagle.bsky.social (Bluesky)Assessing ExxonMobil’s global warming projections Pendant des décennies, ExxonMobil a tenté de discrédité les sciences climatiques. Tandis qu'en interne, ses chercheurs confirmaient les projections de changement climatique. www.science.org/doi/10.1126/...
view full postSeptember 7, 2023
1
-
Mika Mela
@kaikenlaista (Twitter)@ER_Korhola Aikuisten oikeesti
view full postSeptember 5, 2023
-
Tiago Data
@Tiago_Data (Twitter)Assessing ExxonMobil’s global warming projections https://t.co/uWHW1jvSEm
view full postSeptember 2, 2023
1
-
z377
@z377.bsky.social (Bluesky)Climate projections published in science journals by Exxon's geophysicists in the 1970s match NASA's ten years later. Bookmark it. Supran et al 2023 "Assessing ExxonMobil’s global warming projections" in the top tier journal Science. www.science.org/doi/10.1126/...
view full postAugust 24, 2023
1
1
-
Dennis Kendel
@DennisKendel (Twitter)Assessing ExxonMobil’s global warming projections | Science https://t.co/bm1JMNWZ6E @ABDanielleSmith @PremierScottMoe @Alberta_UCP @SaskParty
view full postAugust 13, 2023
1
-
Atomsk's Sanakan
@AtomsksSanakan (Twitter)@OmegaMom_ @hausfath @brearkeologi "Assessing ExxonMobil’s global warming projections" https://t.co/dF5RZoAoRc https://t.co/dqQSONcgAs
view full postJuly 6, 2023
-
Andreas Iliou
@andreasiliou (Twitter)Assessing ExxonMobil’s global warming projections | Science #science #sustainability #alternativeenergy https://t.co/stL05btJHz
view full postJune 29, 2023
-
@WendyBird (Twitter)Assessing ExxonMobil’s global warming projections | Science https://t.co/8cJlJMusC4
view full postJune 28, 2023
-
ItsTheAtmosphere @Padruig@universeodon.com
@ItsTheAtmospher (Twitter)RT @AtomsksSanakan: 34/P https://t.co/XXFIQrQHoH https://t.co/BWqlIyVcf8 PaperOfTheDay "Assessing ExxonMobil’s global warming projection…
view full postJune 12, 2023
-
Atomsk's Sanakan
@AtomsksSanakan (Twitter)34/P https://t.co/XXFIQrQHoH https://t.co/BWqlIyVcf8 PaperOfTheDay "Assessing ExxonMobil’s global warming projections [...] N. Oreskes" https://t.co/oV3GV8Emml https://t.co/9lFiGjSmkW
view full postJune 12, 2023
3
-
Jaap
@Fijnweer (Twitter)RT @han_dolman: They knew, all along….. Assessing ExxonMobil’s global warming projections https://t.co/fqtpSVMZh5
view full postJune 11, 2023
4
-
Frank D’Elia
@FrankDElia7 (Twitter)Assessing ExxonMobil’s global warming projections | Science https://t.co/DEkwK5DToQ
view full postJune 8, 2023
3
-
Climate Change Dummies
@climate_fact (Twitter)RT @HavaClimate: New Climate News: Assessing ExxonMobil’s global warming projections #climatecrisis #climateaction #esg #carbon #sustain…
view full postMay 20, 2023
1
-
HAVA Climate Solutions
@HavaClimate (Twitter)New Climate News: Assessing ExxonMobil’s global warming projections #climatecrisis #climateaction #esg #carbon #sustainability #netzero #climatescam #globalwarming #climatechange https://t.co/BXwkdrBWAX
view full postMay 20, 2023
1
-
Martin Schulze
@MartinS44054498 (Twitter)RT @fridays_freedom: EXXON wußte nicht! In einer peer-reviewed Arbeit https://t.co/C3AQqehC3D behaupten #Rahmstorf et al, dass #Exxon zu Be…
view full postMay 19, 2023
8
-
T. A. Anderson
@mrtaanderson (Twitter)RT @fridays_freedom: EXXON wußte nicht! In einer peer-reviewed Arbeit https://t.co/C3AQqehC3D behaupten #Rahmstorf et al, dass #Exxon zu Be…
view full postMay 18, 2023
8
-
Andreas
@worldtravelandi (Twitter)RT @fridays_freedom: EXXON wußte nicht! In einer peer-reviewed Arbeit https://t.co/C3AQqehC3D behaupten #Rahmstorf et al, dass #Exxon zu Be…
view full postMay 18, 2023
8
-
Hubert Daubmeier
@MrProcess (Twitter)RT @fridays_freedom: EXXON wußte nicht! In einer peer-reviewed Arbeit https://t.co/C3AQqehC3D behaupten #Rahmstorf et al, dass #Exxon zu Be…
view full postMay 17, 2023
8
-
Martina Kiehnle
@Tinimaus1110 (Twitter)RT @fridays_freedom: EXXON wußte nicht! In einer peer-reviewed Arbeit https://t.co/C3AQqehC3D behaupten #Rahmstorf et al, dass #Exxon zu Be…
view full postMay 17, 2023
8
-
Phant
@Phant982 (Twitter)RT @fridays_freedom: EXXON wußte nicht! In einer peer-reviewed Arbeit https://t.co/C3AQqehC3D behaupten #Rahmstorf et al, dass #Exxon zu Be…
view full postMay 17, 2023
8
-
Angel G
@EngelGert (Twitter)RT @fridays_freedom: EXXON wußte nicht! In einer peer-reviewed Arbeit https://t.co/C3AQqehC3D behaupten #Rahmstorf et al, dass #Exxon zu Be…
view full postMay 17, 2023
8
-
Van den Frei
@Van_den_frei (Twitter)RT @fridays_freedom: EXXON wußte nicht! In einer peer-reviewed Arbeit https://t.co/C3AQqehC3D behaupten #Rahmstorf et al, dass #Exxon zu Be…
view full postMay 17, 2023
8
-
Fridays For Freedom
@fridays_freedom (Twitter)EXXON wußte nicht! In einer peer-reviewed Arbeit https://t.co/C3AQqehC3D behaupten #Rahmstorf et al, dass #Exxon zu Beginn der 80er Jahre wußte, dass durch CO2 das Klima verändert wird. Pat. #Frank, Ph.D., Chemiker an der Stanford Uni, Cal., widerlegt diese Aussage und zeigt https://t.co/5iA48UllD6
view full postMay 17, 2023
33
8
-
Linda
@skier_fem (Twitter)Assessing ExxonMobil’s global warming projections https://t.co/IQgyElHeEl
view full postMay 17, 2023
-
Roland Lifka
@Roland_84_E (Twitter)@Harti23L @Leelah1 @MartinBalluch "Assessing ExxonMobil’s global warming projections" https://t.co/K9317eHx1A
view full postMay 15, 2023
-
n/a
@monochr_homo (Twitter)Assessing ExxonMobil's global warming projections - Science https://t.co/4Y4Fe0QCjn https://t.co/nKwMJTwF8B
view full postMay 2, 2023
1
-
Pastafarista
@ToriToribio (Twitter)@riverolavic @Esparregueraera La idea errónea de muchos negacionistas de que el clima actual es fruto de un ciclo es errónea, un reciente artículo de NATURE lo explica. Por cierto, los informes ya preveian hace años esta situación: Assessing ExxonMobil’s Global Warming Projections, Science (80-. ) (2023).
view full postApril 4, 2023
-
Luis P
@p66510332 (Twitter)Assessing ExxonMobil’s global warming projections | Science https://t.co/4MleM9RQ88
view full postMarch 22, 2023
-
ʕ •ᴥ•ʔ
@sirIronWaffle (Twitter)ExxonMobil definitively knew the extent of climate change decades before the public and consistently contradicts their own research https://t.co/KApjbLWf6x https://t.co/IGV7sfowER
view full postMarch 5, 2023
-
あの日、ミッに呼ばれたかもしれない
@anohimihakuseki (Twitter)RT @gigaspora1952: 長い間、地球温暖化は不確かだと言ってきたエクソンモービルは、実は、1970年代に独自の内部モデルでCO2による温暖化を予測していた。 >Assessing ExxonMobil’s global warming projections h…
view full postFebruary 18, 2023
1
-
あの日、ミッに呼ばれたかもしれない
@anohimihakuseki (Twitter)RT @medicalwriting3: Assessing ExxonMobil’s global warming projections エクソンモービル社の地球温暖化予測の評価 https://t.co/O4RTjrkyn3
view full postFebruary 18, 2023
1
-
Bitte Marelius
@BMarelius (Twitter)Assessing ExxonMobil’s global warming projections | Science Assessing ExxonMobil’s global warming projections OLJELOBBYN VISSTE REDAN PÅ 70-TALET ATT DET SKULLE GÅ ÅT HELVETE
view full postFebruary 17, 2023
-
Anasofía04
@Mariana65205000 (Twitter)RT @Brigittelgb: Los científicos de las grandes petroleras proyectaron bien los modelos, pero los ejecutivos y sus agencias de publicidad l…
view full postFebruary 12, 2023
26
-
Iberaeclectica
@Iberaeclectica (Twitter)RT @Brigittelgb: Los científicos de las grandes petroleras proyectaron bien los modelos, pero los ejecutivos y sus agencias de publicidad l…
view full postFebruary 12, 2023
26
-
Kike
@kikepinedo (Twitter)RT @Brigittelgb: Los científicos de las grandes petroleras proyectaron bien los modelos, pero los ejecutivos y sus agencias de publicidad l…
view full postFebruary 12, 2023
26
-
Wifey
@ChiefQuaant (Twitter)RT @Brigittelgb: Los científicos de las grandes petroleras proyectaron bien los modelos, pero los ejecutivos y sus agencias de publicidad l…
view full postFebruary 12, 2023
26
-
Harley
@HarleyHofman (Twitter)RT @Brigittelgb: Los científicos de las grandes petroleras proyectaron bien los modelos, pero los ejecutivos y sus agencias de publicidad l…
view full postFebruary 12, 2023
26
-
Walfran Solano
@wivesol (Twitter)RT @Brigittelgb: Los científicos de las grandes petroleras proyectaron bien los modelos, pero los ejecutivos y sus agencias de publicidad l…
view full postFebruary 12, 2023
26
-
Wilson Rodríguez
@WilsonRS20 (Twitter)RT @Brigittelgb: Los científicos de las grandes petroleras proyectaron bien los modelos, pero los ejecutivos y sus agencias de publicidad l…
view full postFebruary 12, 2023
26
-
JuanQ
@Juan_Gatun (Twitter)RT @Brigittelgb: Los científicos de las grandes petroleras proyectaron bien los modelos, pero los ejecutivos y sus agencias de publicidad l…
view full postFebruary 11, 2023
26
-
Mickaël LALANDE
@LalandeMickael (Twitter)@Tanguy_Cornec @GerhardKrinner @Fnac @FonfredeMichel @journey6369 @GVilleval @catnatnet @FlayDeni ➡️ pas que des enfants de cœur derrière la désinformation (Les Marchands de doute ou https://t.co/yEeYkwR2Bl) + couverture médiatique disproportionnée par rapport au consensus scientifique : https://t.co/LIdl1qB24Y
view full postFebruary 9, 2023
-
Raoul J de Groot
@raouljdegroot (Twitter)@mottani38 @hansvantelling Weliswaar geen fysica, maar zoals het voorbeeld beschreven in bijgaand review uit Science? Het klimaatonderzoek van Exxon? De resultaten uit dit onderzoek en uit onafhankelijke studies worden overigens door zeker persoon ontkend. https://t.co/Je8ZyEV4jz
view full postFebruary 2, 2023
-
KWSnet
@KWSnet (Twitter)‘Assessing ExxonMobil’s Global Warming Projections’ Science, 13 Jan 2023 https://t.co/92K1OoI3Ym "ExxonMobil’s projections accurately forecast warming consistent with later observations... However, the company’s public statements about climate science contradicted its own data."
view full postJanuary 17, 2023
-
Κασσάνδροσ Full-time Future Forecaster until 2027.
@JeanMichelFleur (Twitter)For trying to convince the public to believe that a causative link between fossil fuel use and climate warming could not be made: Fuck you .@exxonmobil Supran, G., et al. (2023). Assessing ExxonMobil’s global warming projections. Science, 379(6628). https://t.co/v0cC2PtIqj https://t.co/ZtV68iuKUu
view full postJanuary 16, 2023
-
Bruno Renkin
@bruno-renkin.bsky.social (Bluesky)Assessing ExxonMobil’s #GlobalWarming projections#Exxon scientists have predicted global warming with impressive accuracy since 1977. Great scientists. https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.abk0063?utm_medium=social&utm_source=twitter
view full postJanuary 16, 2023
-
Bruno Renkin
@bruno-renkin.bsky.social (Bluesky)Assessing ExxonMobil’s #GlobalWarming projections#Exxon scientists have predicted global warming with impressive accuracy since 1977. Great scientists. https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.abk0063?utm_medium=social&utm_source=twitter
view full postJanuary 16, 2023
-
Jim Java
@priscian (Twitter)@inforiist @Jaisans @jonwaldron @ZombiePiano @RichwoodsAus @agentsinaction @Anvndarnamn5 @Convict025 @JR4_Truth @roger_clague @d_e_mol @ejwwest @BubbasRanch @Veritatem2021 @dude_america @lynnmcbeth @Mark_A_Lunn @AtomsksSanakan @TakethatCt @aSinister @nalonjack @Enlight42 @BJChippindale @MarionMartin199 @MephistoTabern1 @OBundWIE @jpgcrowley @VictorJennpaul @SniemN @RushhourP @JohnDublin10 @RickLazzarini @JamesAbbott2013 @DrMarkJoyce1 @Neilcharles1450 @Projectedsouli1 @glinch72 @IanHugh07940666 @TheDisproof @DocSnow1 @LouisCy72344053 @fagandr1 @njbtweet @jefftonna1 @27Legin @TheKingsTrigger @B_Bolshevik100 @25_cycle @bashannon Major scientific journal trumps amateurish blog. https://t.co/bEHu04XHVn
view full postJanuary 16, 2023
-
ERDAL
@ERDAL1822 (Twitter)Supran, Rahmstorf y Oreskes (2023). Assessing ExxonMobil’s global warming projections. https://t.co/8dAHIk6aqR @science
view full postJanuary 14, 2023
-
Hannes Grünbichler
@HGrunbichler (Twitter)"The Exxon Knowledge" (Abb. A) mache ich als HTL-Lehrer immer als Vorbereitung zum Planspiel einer Ökobilanzierung der unterschiedlichen Antriebsarten (Verbrenner vs. BEV) durch. Abb. entnommen aus https://t.co/kh1EJki1Be https://t.co/LnUnKi6UOM
view full postJanuary 14, 2023
2
-
Fabio Galeotti
@_FabioGaleotti_ (Twitter)They knew it since the late 1970s, but they always worked to deny it. QED. https://t.co/14B6it8AZd https://t.co/JkZIxL7kUp
view full postJanuary 13, 2023
1
-
KWSnet
@KWSnet (Twitter)‘Assessing ExxonMobil’s Global Warming Projections’ Science, 13 Jan 2023 https://t.co/92K1OoI3Ym "Most projections accurately forecast warming consistent with subsequent observations. Their projections were also consistent with those of independent academic & government models."
view full postJanuary 13, 2023
-
anlomedad
@anlomedad (Twitter)https://t.co/Do2HX2wyvF Twitter thread by study author: https://t.co/3Iloy3CSW9 #Science #Environment #ClimateChange #Climate #Exxon #Fraud #GlobalWarming #Carbon #Emissions #FossilFuels https://t.co/hK46b6Nj9Q (2/2) https://t.co/jGebCus4eI
view full postJanuary 13, 2023
-
j mallet
@eratosignis (Twitter)@climateskeptic4 @ge0geek @ClimateDepot @mattwridley etc. etc. Global warming science due to C02 increases: a "conspiracy" so widespread and well understood that in 1982 even Exxon scientists predicted it. https://t.co/iQUqTql5T9 https://t.co/KZLUv595iK
view full postJanuary 13, 2023
1
-
Javier G P Gamarra
@javiergpgamarra.bsky.social (Bluesky)This is indeed a fantastic scientific approach. #detectivescience reminds me of my Hudson Bay company paper back in 2000! Really worth a read!! Assessing ExxonMobil’s global warming projections https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.abk0063#.Y8EF3_hnkrg.twitter
view full postJanuary 13, 2023
-
Mary
@myearthproject (Twitter)Assessing ExxonMobil's global warming projections https://t.co/CfuIRqQmVY
view full postJanuary 12, 2023
-
James Holland Jones
@juemos.bsky.social (Bluesky)Internal company memos show that, since the 1970s, Exxon knew that burning their fossil-fuel products could lead to global warming with "dramatic environmental effects before the year 2050." https://doi.org/10.1126/science.abk0063
view full postJanuary 12, 2023
-
BONUS
@TheDisproof (Twitter)RT @Willard1951: @25_cycle @GreyTonka @Climate_Takes @imperiallocust @FChecker76 @RichardKing633 @TheDisproof @johnson_wrjohn1 @Climatehope…
view full postJanuary 12, 2023
1
-
James William Owens
@Willard1951 (Twitter)@25_cycle @GreyTonka @Climate_Takes @imperiallocust @FChecker76 @RichardKing633 @TheDisproof @johnson_wrjohn1 @Climatehope2 @LHaden_Climate @ejwwest @ThruNoiz @DawnTJ90 @suffect @KeillerDon @Faktantarkast10 @BJChippindale @LemarbreStephen @Mike8Wallace @verycentrist @j70def @lyndon_staley @EdBohman @GrahamKirk17 @Stephen90045069 @WHUT @EcoSenseNow @RStabb26 @MorseBart @EDavidAn @MartinJBern @AreYouDerp @canncr @PDemichel @RHMcK1 @outsanest @Robert76907841 @ClimateSkeptic4 @coug62 @Bos77 @MhehedZherting @LesJohnsonHrvat @aDissentient @ChrisBBacon3 @algore @LeoDiCaprio @nytclimate @BBCNewsnight Quick FYI for you & others if you have not seen Review on Exxon's models & projections for global warming published in Science Open access for a few days Supran et al 'Assessing ExxonMobil's global warming projections' Science v379 153 & eabk0063 2023 https://t.co/orNZnISI9E
view full postJanuary 12, 2023
4
1
Abstract Synopsis
- A study evaluated ExxonMobil's climate projections from 1977 to 2003, and found that many of their forecasts matched later climate observations.
- Their predictions were as accurate as those made by independent academic and government models, correctly anticipating significant global warming and accurately estimating when it would become noticeable.
- Despite their scientific accuracy, ExxonMobil's public statements on climate science often contradicted the findings of their own research.
illep
@_illep (Twitter)