ChatGPT listed as author on research papers: many scientists disapprove https://t.co/dMn8rxmJuW
ChatGPT listed as author on research papers: many scientists disapprove.
Mentions
Extended reach
Total likes
Video views
Mentions per month
Jan 2023 – Jan 2025Where it's discussed
-
News129 articles
-
X / Twitter121 posts
-
Blogs36 articles
-
Facebook22 posts
-
Reddit6 posts
-
YouTube2 videos
AI synopsis
What people are saying
This collection of discussions reflects a significant concern regarding the inclusion of AI like ChatGPT as authors on research papers. Many posts raise questions about the necessity of human contribution for authorship, with users pointing out that AI cannot assume the responsibilities typically associated with authorship. Phrases such as 'AI does not fulfill the criteria for a study author' and 'ChatGPT as a co-author raises huge ethical concerns' illustrate the serious tone and urgency in addressing academic integrity within this emerging trend.
Most discussions reflect a disapproval of AI being listed as an author, indicating a moderate level of agreement with traditional authorship criteria.
The topic has sparked a high level of curiosity, prompting many users to engage and share their thoughts on the implications for academic integrity.
While many posts express disapproval, only a few delve into deeper discussions regarding the ramifications of AI in academia.
Posters perceive the growing trend of including AI as authors as having significant implications for the academic landscape.
Abstract in brief
- Some scientists are expressing concerns about the practice of listing AI like ChatGPT as authors on research papers.
- They argue that including AI as authors undermines traditional authorship criteria, which typically require human contribution.
- The debate highlights the need for clearer guidelines on how AI tools should be credited in academic research.
Top posts
Most liked on X and BlueskyChatGPT listed as author on research papers: many scientists disapprove https://t.co/3lZg3a82x8
https://t.co/RjQqwfEK3e At the same time Elsevier recommend: "Authors should not list AI and AI-assisted technologies as an author or co-author, nor cite AI as an author. Authorship implies responsibilities and tasks that can only be attributed to and performed by humans"
ChatGPT listed as author on research papers: many scientists disapprove @TWenseleers @RadCentrism https://t.co/jWIZQFNAv8
Trending on PubMed: ChatGPT listed as author on research papers: many scientists disapprove. https://t.co/BbVgnvaE3K
Nature "ChatGPT listed as author on research papers: many scientists disapprove" https://t.co/x2FsWXuwCZ Is this such a big deal? Everybody knows ChatGPT is not human. Adding it does not hurt anything, as long as its outputs are validated/edited by human scientists.
All mentions
Academic Journals and AI-Generated Manuscripts: Current Trends
In this video, I examine how academic journals are responding to AI-generated manuscripts. Some scientists express concerns about listing AI like ChatGPT as authors, arguing it undermines traditional authorship…
Concerns Over AI Authors in Academic Research
This closing session of the FIC course on Scientific Research Projects addresses the implications of AI, particularly ChatGPT, in academic writing. It explores the debates surrounding AI authorship and the need for…
RT @carpe_diem0820: AIツールであるChatGPTが研究論文の著者として記載されることは、内容や整合性に責任を持てないため、多くの科学者が不賛成も、4つの論文で共著者として記載あり 医学雑誌は使用規制について対応中 ChatGPT listed as au…
ChatGPT listed as author on research papers: many scientists disapprove
ChatGPT listed as author on research papers: many scientists disapprove https://t.co/tMEpTzp2Rq
"ChatGPT listed as author on research papers: many scientists disapprove" — Read it on @ResearchGate: https://t.co/AqU5M1FlZN
https://t.co/FUdywHQJcw
ChatGPT listed as author on research papers: many scientists disapprove https://t.co/LWTunhIhor
La IA está alterando muchas industrias como la académica. Interesante artículo de la revista @Nature #CCUOCChatGPT #ChatGPT ChatGPT listed as author on research papers: many scientists disapprove https://t.co/VKampj6ucT
RT @alec1a: ChatGPT listed as author on research papers: many scientists disapprove https://t.co/3JV5R6ualH https://t.co/oCNBIhJjBa
ChatGPT listed as author on research papers: many scientists disapprove https://t.co/ebZI5PGazh
RT @FerSuarezMD: ChatGPT listed as author on research papers: many scientists disapprove https://t.co/2ttx45RfcY
RT @FerSuarezMD: ChatGPT listed as author on research papers: many scientists disapprove https://t.co/2ttx45RfcY
ChatGPT listed as author on research papers: many scientists disapprove https://t.co/2ttx45RfcY
RT @carpe_diem0820: AIツールであるChatGPTが研究論文の著者として記載されることは、内容や整合性に責任を持てないため、多くの科学者が不賛成も、4つの論文で共著者として記載あり 医学雑誌は使用規制について対応中 ChatGPT listed as au…
RT @metodosdolores: AI, artificial intelligence, autoria y plagiarismo. https://t.co/3iXoHa0nZZ
AI, artificial intelligence, autoria y plagiarismo. https://t.co/3iXoHa0nZZ
In this video, I examine how academic journals are responding to the submission of manuscripts prepared with the aid of an AI tool such as Chat GPT. https://t.co/8WBUtw3vOe
In this video, I examine how academic journals are responding to the submission of manuscripts prepared with the aid of an AI tool such as Chat GPT. https://t.co/Qgxl9h27sp
著者は論文と研究全体の責任を負う必要があるので #ChatGPT は共著者にはなれない、謝辞に書くくらいだよね。という妥当な論でした。この構造はきっと変わらない、、、よね? #nature #論文 ChatGPT listed as author on research papers: many scientists disapprove https://t.co/dlwMGHNNlb
ChatGPT listed as author on research papers: many scientists disapprove https://t.co/4Gq3tgX1U0 AIは、著作物に対して責任を取れないからダメ、らしい。
ChatGPT listed as author on research papers: many scientists disapprove https://t.co/JfNw9r3I3S
RT @felixdemoya: https://t.co/RjQqwfEK3e At the same time Elsevier recommend: "Authors should not list AI and AI-assisted technologies as a…
ChatGPT listed as author on research papers: many scientists disapprove https://t.co/8TTIAYWveA
RT @felixdemoya: https://t.co/RjQqwfEK3e At the same time Elsevier recommend: "Authors should not list AI and AI-assisted technologies as a…
This is stupendous. ChatGPT listed as author on research papers: many scientists disapprove https://t.co/BdrpUnVfWB
RT @felixdemoya: https://t.co/RjQqwfEK3e At the same time Elsevier recommend: "Authors should not list AI and AI-assisted technologies as a…
RT @felixdemoya: https://t.co/RjQqwfEK3e At the same time Elsevier recommend: "Authors should not list AI and AI-assisted technologies as a…
RT @felixdemoya: https://t.co/RjQqwfEK3e At the same time Elsevier recommend: "Authors should not list AI and AI-assisted technologies as a…
RT @felixdemoya: https://t.co/RjQqwfEK3e At the same time Elsevier recommend: "Authors should not list AI and AI-assisted technologies as a…
RT @felixdemoya: https://t.co/RjQqwfEK3e At the same time Elsevier recommend: "Authors should not list AI and AI-assisted technologies as a…
RT @felixdemoya: https://t.co/RjQqwfEK3e At the same time Elsevier recommend: "Authors should not list AI and AI-assisted technologies as a…
RT @felixdemoya: https://t.co/RjQqwfEK3e At the same time Elsevier recommend: "Authors should not list AI and AI-assisted technologies as a…
https://t.co/RjQqwfEK3e At the same time Elsevier recommend: "Authors should not list AI and AI-assisted technologies as an author or co-author, nor cite AI as an author. Authorship implies responsibilities and tasks that can only be attributed to and performed by humans"
ChatGPTが共著者?! "ChatGPT listed as author on research papers: many scientists disapprove" https://t.co/Cs1d1NMcqz
ChatGPT listed as author on research papers: many scientists disapprove https://t.co/FtaIxsDep2
RT @ralbaruiz: @chatgptimpact ➡️ChatGPT listed as author on research papers: many scientists disapprove ... https://t.co/TVU8T8eKfd [https:…
@chatgptimpact ➡️ChatGPT listed as author on research papers: many scientists disapprove ... https://t.co/TVU8T8eKfd [https://t.co/G3NENq5Jaa]
ChatGPT listed as author on research papers: many scientists disapprove https://t.co/5KjkFvvI0D
RT @EvanKirstel: ChatGPT listed as author on research papers: many scientists disapprove https://t.co/3lZg3a82x8
ChatGPT listed as author on research papers: many scientists disapprove https://t.co/kEh6rTk7ls
RT @EvanKirstel: ChatGPT listed as author on research papers: many scientists disapprove https://t.co/3lZg3a82x8
RT @sblanco: ¿Puede una IA ser considerada coautora de un artículo científico? Por obvia que parezca la respuesta, el debate está sobre la…
RT @EvanKirstel: ChatGPT listed as author on research papers: many scientists disapprove https://t.co/3lZg3a82x8
RT @EvanKirstel: ChatGPT listed as author on research papers: many scientists disapprove https://t.co/3lZg3a82x8
RT @EvanKirstel: ChatGPT listed as author on research papers: many scientists disapprove https://t.co/3lZg3a82x8
RT @EvanKirstel: ChatGPT listed as author on research papers: many scientists disapprove https://t.co/3lZg3a82x8
RT @EvanKirstel: ChatGPT listed as author on research papers: many scientists disapprove https://t.co/3lZg3a82x8
RT @EvanKirstel: ChatGPT listed as author on research papers: many scientists disapprove https://t.co/3lZg3a82x8
RT @EvanKirstel: ChatGPT listed as author on research papers: many scientists disapprove https://t.co/3lZg3a82x8
RT @EvanKirstel: ChatGPT listed as author on research papers: many scientists disapprove https://t.co/3lZg3a82x8
RT @EvanKirstel: ChatGPT listed as author on research papers: many scientists disapprove https://t.co/3lZg3a82x8
ChatGPT listed as author on research papers: many scientists disapprove https://t.co/3lZg3a82x8
RT @frankyap222: ChatGPT listed as author on research papers: many scientists disapprove https://t.co/t3UiA1EZ4E
ChatGPT listed as author on research papers: many scientists disapprove https://t.co/t3UiA1EZ4E
RT @arulscaria: 'ChatGPT listed as author on research papers: many scientists disapprove' #AI #LLM #authorship https://t.co/7orWjtbdZv
ChatGPT listed as author on research papers: many scientists disapprove. At least four articles credit the AI tool as a co-author, as publishers scramble to regulate its use. https://t.co/X3JDgVOdpF
"ChatGPT listed as author on research papers: many scientists disapprove" by @stokel https://t.co/7xIiT47dGb
ChatGPT listed as author on research papers: many scientists disapprove https://t.co/PLAKK2qE4p
ChatGPT Listed as Author on Research Papers. Many Scientists Disapprove. #technology #technologynews #technews https://t.co/CQ1fOJ5475
ChatGPT listed as author on research papers: many scientists disapprove https://t.co/aGVUW0kA8f
ChatGPT listed as author on research papers: many scientists disapprove https://t.co/yZFBGNDrHA via @Nature
ChatGPT listed as author on research papers: many scientists disapprove https://t.co/gBp9FYzqLM
ChatGPT listed as author on research papers: many scientists disapprove https://t.co/RiKAO8gFeh
ChatGPT listed as author on research papers: many scientists disapprove https://t.co/k2UkO9dOg4 Opinions?
RT @Faust_III: ChatGPT listed as author on research papers: many scientists disapprove https://t.co/y5a0IM32os
RT @drbeen_medical: ChatGPT listed as author on research papers: many scientists disapprove https://t.co/dMn8rxmJuW
ChatGPT listed as author on research papers: many scientists disapprove https://t.co/y5a0IM32os
RT @drbeen_medical: ChatGPT listed as author on research papers: many scientists disapprove https://t.co/dMn8rxmJuW
RT @drbeen_medical: ChatGPT listed as author on research papers: many scientists disapprove https://t.co/dMn8rxmJuW
ChatGPT listed as author on research papers: many scientists disapprove https://t.co/dMn8rxmJuW
ChatGPT listed as author on research papers: many scientists disapprove https://t.co/mheaJAD3Kz
ChatGPT listed as author on research papers: many scientists disapprove @TWenseleers @RadCentrism https://t.co/jWIZQFNAv8
ChatGPT listed as author on research papers: many scientists disapprove https://t.co/YGUZTciVtW
ChatGPT Listed as author on research papers: many scientists disapprove https://t.co/wKP0ijuxxa
ChatGPT listed as author on research papers: many scientists disapprove https://t.co/AxFo6fVSf1 AI must become a justifiable entity. There are various approaches how this can be achieved.
RT @Nature: ChatGPT listed as author on research papers: many scientists disapprove https://t.co/3EI6tCbdJh
#ChatGPT listed as author on research papers : many scientists disapprove At least four articles credit the AI tool as a co-author, as publishers scramble to regulate its use.
ChatGPT listed as author on research papers: many scientists disapprove https://t.co/fnZMnmkvsK
RT @ujlibscience: ChatGPT listed as author on research papers: many scientists disapprove https://t.co/R7K2uVPSe4 @Prof_Meijboom @gleungws…
Tämmöinenkin näkökulma tarjolla. ChatGPT listed as author on research papers: many scientists disapprove https://t.co/GDb01iA3Cm
ChatGPT listed as author on research papers: many scientists disapprove. #AI #ArtificialIntelligence #Academia https://t.co/EooJXUc7rj
RT @maxplanckpress: #ChatGPT listed as author on #research papers: many scientists disapprove. What do you think about it? https://t.co/Mo8…
ChatGPT listed as author on research papers: many scientists disapprove https://t.co/jMtlbmYwPk
ChatGPT listed as author on research papers: many scientists disapprove https://t.co/Vh3Lr9n3YD
ChatGPT listed as author on research papers: many scientists disapprove https://t.co/EvmLeuC5hY
#ChatGPT listed as author on research papers: many scientists disapprove https://t.co/LWTunhIhor
#ChatGPT listed as author on research papers: many scientists disapprove https://t.co/CUhDGVdx04 | via @Nature by @stokel
RT @MPAlonso: ChatGPT listed as author on research papers: many scientists disapprove https://t.co/rHsp6PUoeN
ChatGPT listed as author on research papers: many scientists disapprove https://t.co/uUTKlOwY9z
ChatGPT listed as author on research papers: many scientists disapprove. At least four articles credit the AI tool as a co-author, as publishers scramble to regulate its use. https://t.co/sqZhCX4gE5
RT @biochem_fan: Nature "ChatGPT listed as author on research papers: many scientists disapprove" https://t.co/x2FsWXuwCZ Is this such a b…
RT @ujlibscience: ChatGPT listed as author on research papers: many scientists disapprove https://t.co/R7K2uVPSe4 @Prof_Meijboom @gleungws…
ChatGPT listed as author on research papers: many scientists disapprove https://t.co/G4PtMcIj67
Nature "ChatGPT listed as author on research papers: many scientists disapprove" https://t.co/x2FsWXuwCZ Is this such a big deal? Everybody knows ChatGPT is not human. Adding it does not hurt anything, as long as its outputs are validated/edited by human scientists.
ChatGPT listed as author on research papers: many scientists disapprove https://t.co/k1IzL7eNuF
RT @Nature: ChatGPT listed as author on research papers: many scientists disapprove https://t.co/3EI6tCbdJh
RT @_jdevos_: Will AI help write scientific papers? How can we deal with it? ➡️ ChatGPT listed as author on research papers: many scientis…
RT @_jdevos_: Will AI help write scientific papers? How can we deal with it? ➡️ ChatGPT listed as author on research papers: many scientis…
ChatGPT listed as author on research papers: many scientists disapprove https://t.co/rHsp6PUoeN
RT @Nature: ChatGPT listed as author on research papers: many scientists disapprove https://t.co/3EI6tCbdJh
ChatGPT listed as author on research papers: many scientists disapprove https://t.co/LPg4iV3TBp
ChatGPTが論文著者デビュー ChatGPT listed as author on research papers: many scientists disapprove https://t.co/bB74K1gcnQ
ChatGPT listed as author on research papers: many scientists disapprove https://t.co/mSxjlzZSX0
ChatGPT listed as author on research papers: many scientists disapprove https://t.co/HZ4j56CSKz
@DoctorZen Paywalls are frustrating! Access the article from your library: https://t.co/Ky4gqJ0Cdc Promote scholarly access when tweeting articles by simply adding https://t.co/SXSePSX5De to the DOI URL
A few papers have already used ChatGPT: https://t.co/v0hr4uOtvE More importantly, Canva has an AI called "Magic Write" to help people create documents already. It suggests people see writing AI as a feature, and that will push it to become commonplace. 4/5 https://t.co/koLgxzF6yh
RT @ujlibscience: ChatGPT listed as author on research papers: many scientists disapprove https://t.co/R7K2uVPSe4 @Prof_Meijboom @gleungws…
ChatGPT listed as author on research papers: many scientists disapprove https://t.co/zUVI9egNwq
Will AI help write scientific papers? How can we deal with it? ➡️ ChatGPT listed as author on research papers: many scientists disapprove https://t.co/UnWnE8GE7T
ChatGPT listed as author on research papers: many scientists disapprove https://t.co/R7K2uVPSe4 @Prof_Meijboom @gleungws @UJBioTecFoodTec @UjZoology @UJBotany @bettinevv @GilbertBeric @GreenfieldProf @HassinaMouri
ChatGPT listed as author on research papers: many scientists disapprove https://t.co/02uzB2i7Qy
RT @leventkurnaz: ChatGPT kanunen yazdıklarından sorumlu tutulabilir mi? Makaleler üzerindeki tartışma burada düğümleniyor. ChatGPT listed…
ChatGPT kanunen yazdıklarından sorumlu tutulabilir mi? Makaleler üzerindeki tartışma burada düğümleniyor. ChatGPT listed as author on research papers: many scientists disapprove https://t.co/vhd82uWcVZ
ChatGPT listed as author on research papers: many scientists disapprove https://t.co/7IfFfkTU8j
ChatGPT listed as author on research papers: many scientists disapprove https://t.co/6JP0zuLNoL ネイチャーの論文著者に ChatGPT !!!もうにんげんはおしまいです。
Trending on PubMed: ChatGPT listed as author on research papers: many scientists disapprove. https://t.co/BbVgnvaE3K
@PetteriA ChatGPT kirjoittaa nykyisin vertaisarvioituja tieteellisiä artikkeleita https://t.co/RPVetgCfZM. Tieteellisten kustantajien suhtautuminen eroaa. Katsotaan, mikä tulee olemaan linjaus kullakin, vai tuleekö yhtenäinen linjaus.
RT @DrManisitDas: "Publishers agree #AI such as #ChatGPT do not fulfill the criteria for a study author because they cannot take responsibi…
‘ChatGPT Listed as Author on Research Papers: Many Scientists Disapprove’ Nature, 18 Jan 2023 https://t.co/eki1xUT6K2 "Journal editors, researchers, & publishers are debating place of such AI tools in published literature & whether it’s appropriate to cite the bot as an author."
RT @DrManisitDas: "Publishers agree #AI such as #ChatGPT do not fulfill the criteria for a study author because they cannot take responsibi…
"Publishers agree #AI such as #ChatGPT do not fulfill the criteria for a study author because they cannot take responsibility for content and integrity of scientific papers." This is aligned with standards for #authorship according to ICMJE criteria. https://t.co/PP53TZgTze