Impressive new paper by @OJPNIJ's John Morgan scruitinizes "false or misleading forensic evidence" in @exonerationlist cases
Wrongful convictions and claims of false or misleading forensic evidence.
Mentions
Extended reach
Total likes
Video views
Mentions per month
Jan 2023 – May 2025Where it's discussed
-
X / Twitter50 posts
-
YouTube2 videos
-
Facebook2 posts
-
News2 articles
-
Blogs2 articles
-
Bluesky1 posts
AI synopsis
What people are saying
This collection reflects strong support for the importance of addressing forensic errors in wrongful convictions, with examples like references to specific cases, detailed studies of forensic failures, and calls for improved standards, all conveyed through assertive language and professional tone that underscore the gravity and relevance of the topic.
Most discussions highlight the importance of scrutinizing forensic evidence and recognize that errors contribute to wrongful convictions, showing general support for the article's focus.
Participants show high interest, frequently referencing detailed studies, forensic concepts, and notable cases like Bryan Kohberger, indicating active curiosity and concern.
Many contributors analyze technical issues, mention standards, and advocate for improving forensic practices, demonstrating deep engagement with the topic.
The discussions emphasize the significance of better forensic standards and practices, suggesting these insights could influence policy and professional behavior, thus having high impact.
Top posts
Most liked on X and BlueskyWrongful conviction research provides insights into the nature of errors related to forensic evidence. One study looked at case factors classified by @exonerationlist as being associated with “False or Misleading Forensic Evidence:" https://t.co/wEXs3RFqVg #WrongfulConvictionDay https://t.co/RnGNvfhJxK
When researchers examined factors associated with wrongful convictions, they found that in about half of these cases, improved tech or testimony and practice standards may have prevented wrongful conviction at the time of trial: https://t.co/dwVp1LnBBc https://t.co/0FOGkoptZa
Las condenas erróneas y reclamos de evidencia forense engañosa. Mala práctica forense por incompetencia del "experto".los informes o testimonios comunican mal los resultados, no se ajustan a los estándares o no brindan la información limitante adecuada. https://t.co/gotlEPYFAC
Developing and enforcing standards may be the most important way to mitigate the likelihood of examiner errors contributing to #WrongfulConvictions. Learn more in this newly published #JFS open-access article (@ExpertErrors): https://t.co/aZEZsiyugV https://t.co/PkoOfQrIZB
#BryanKohberger #Idaho4 Wrongful convictions and claims of false or misleading forensic evidence: 2.6 Error type 4 https://t.co/zoas5qMIII https://t.co/4XsJ1934fu
All mentions
Understanding Systemic Racism through Darryl Hunt's Case
In this video, I discuss the case of Darryl Hunt, who was wrongfully convicted of murder in 1984. Despite being exonerated through forensic science, he spent nearly 20 years in prison. This case highlights the impact of…
Negative Corpus in Forensic Errors: The Joseph Awe Case
This week, ExpertErrors explores the Joseph Awe case, focusing on negative corpus—an idea popularized by Sherlock Holmes. Discover how this concept is deemed nonscientific and illogical, and its impact on wrongful…
Morgan J. Wrongful convictions and claims of false or misleading forensic evidence. J Forensic Sci. 2023;68:908–961. https://t.co/rZUbEmfOux 9/x
4/4 “Wrongful convictions and claims of false or misleading forensic evidence” John Morgan PhD First published: 22 March 2023 https://t.co/zoas5qMIII Citations: 2 Preliminary results of this study were presented at the American Society of Crime Laboratory Directors Meeting, https://t.co/9EnhCMGakC
3/4 “Wrongful convictions and claims of false or misleading forensic evidence” John Morgan PhD First published: 22 March 2023 https://t.co/zoas5qMIII Citations: 2 Preliminary results of this study were presented at the American Society of Crime Laboratory Directors Meeting, https://t.co/MUb1LdHSC8
2/4 “Wrongful convictions and claims of false or misleading forensic evidence” John Morgan PhD First published: 22 March 2023 https://t.co/zoas5qMIII Citations: 2 Preliminary results of this study were presented at the American Society of Crime Laboratory Directors Meeting, https://t.co/T1g3wqGpxO
1/4 “Wrongful convictions and claims of false or misleading forensic evidence” John Morgan PhD First published: 22 March 2023 https://t.co/zoas5qMIII Citations: 2 Preliminary results of this study were presented at the American Society of Crime Laboratory Directors Meeting, https://t.co/4I1ms9JZxR
RT @AudreyC244834: #BryanKohberger #Idaho4 Wrongful convictions and claims of false or misleading forensic evidence: 2.6 Error type 4 ht…
RT @AudreyC244834: #BryanKohberger #Idaho4 Wrongful convictions and claims of false or misleading forensic evidence: 2.7 Error type 5 ht…
https://t.co/Ux3AjeAnxn
Wrongful convictions and claims of false or misleading forensic evidence - Morgan - 2023 - Journal of Forensic Sciences - Wiley Online Library https://t.co/BKkV0g2iUS
RT @veryold1957: https://t.co/T1oD0pahu8
https://t.co/T1oD0pahu8
RT @OJPNIJ: Wrongful conviction research provides insights into the nature of errors related to forensic evidence. One study looked at case…
RT @OJPNIJ: Wrongful conviction research provides insights into the nature of errors related to forensic evidence. One study looked at case…
RT @OJPNIJ: Wrongful conviction research provides insights into the nature of errors related to forensic evidence. One study looked at case…
Wrongful conviction research provides insights into the nature of errors related to forensic evidence. One study looked at case factors classified by @exonerationlist as being associated with “False or Misleading Forensic Evidence:" https://t.co/wEXs3RFqVg #WrongfulConvictionDay https://t.co/RnGNvfhJxK
RT @OJPNIJ: When researchers examined factors associated with wrongful convictions, they found that in about half of these cases, improved…
When researchers examined factors associated with wrongful convictions, they found that in about half of these cases, improved tech or testimony and practice standards may have prevented wrongful conviction at the time of trial: https://t.co/dwVp1LnBBc https://t.co/0FOGkoptZa
#BryanKohberger #Idaho4 Wrongful convictions and claims of false or misleading forensic evidence: 2.7 Error type 5 https://t.co/zoas5qMIII https://t.co/eIXKX9DO7e
#BryanKohberger #Idaho4 Wrongful convictions and claims of false or misleading forensic evidence: 2.6 Error type 4 https://t.co/zoas5qMIII https://t.co/4XsJ1934fu
Wrongful convictions and claims of false or misleading forensic evidence - Morgan - 2023 - Journal of Forensic Sciences - Wiley Online Library https://t.co/yWIReqdiQQ
@dregray247 @SimonScarrow @Bren4Bassetlaw I would recommend doing some reading around the subject especially regarding DNA. Particularly in this study of 1391 forensic cases, they found 732 to be associated with wrongful convictions. What we want and what is possible aren’t always the same… https://t.co/ivadCmwbH6
@ABC7Chicago Really. https://t.co/hkb7KO6QES https://t.co/9scOPBCgnv https://t.co/EUczCkBBRN
https://t.co/8lvKg7wOw5
RT @grafologos: Las condenas erróneas y reclamos de evidencia forense engañosa. Mala práctica forense por incompetencia del "experto".los i…
RT @grafologos: Las condenas erróneas y reclamos de evidencia forense engañosa. Mala práctica forense por incompetencia del "experto".los i…
Las condenas erróneas y reclamos de evidencia forense engañosa. Mala práctica forense por incompetencia del "experto".los informes o testimonios comunican mal los resultados, no se ajustan a los estándares o no brindan la información limitante adecuada. https://t.co/gotlEPYFAC
Negative corpus was made famous by Sherlock Holmes--once you eliminate the impossible, then whatever remains, no matter how improbable, must be true. In the real world, this is poor critical thinking and has contributed to wrongful convictions. https://t.co/Ux4bFN7TEk https://t.co/63Dlo3WGfk
Fire scene investigation should be based on a clear understanding of the origin point of the fire. In the Joseph Awe case, an electrical origin was eliminated incorrectly, and a dubious origin site led to a wrongful conviction. https://t.co/Ux4bFN7TEk https://t.co/E2wESD3ZDp
Arthur Conan Doyle--by way of Sherlock Holmes--popularized the negative corpus, using the process of elimination to justify a conclusion, "no matter how improbable." This wholly illogical and unscientific idea has contributed to many wrongful convictions. https://t.co/Ux4bFN7TEk https://t.co/wvLhiYUEBg
"The forensic science community has been limited in its ability to communicate the realities and value of current forensic science practices. The criminal justice system has relied on outdated or incomplete information on wrongful…https://t.co/Nb3EzHbTZ2 https://t.co/fhpfzgeG4Y
In Washington, DC this week to participate in the NIJ conference and discuss lessons learned from wrongful convictions associated with false or misleading forensic evidence, such as the value of scientific standards. Check out the Joseph Awe arson case.https://t.co/Ux4bFN7TEk https://t.co/kAHPpTHokR
https://t.co/nPd06rWJ17 Don’t mind me, I’ll just be over here sharing this research which absolutely validates my experience reviewing forensic reports and testimony in every platform to which I have access. Forensic oversight now. #forensicscience #forensicdna #testimonyfail
RT @The_AAFS: Developing and enforcing standards may be the most important way to mitigate the likelihood of examiner errors contributing t…
RT @The_AAFS: Developing and enforcing standards may be the most important way to mitigate the likelihood of examiner errors contributing t…
Developing and enforcing standards may be the most important way to mitigate the likelihood of examiner errors contributing to #WrongfulConvictions. Learn more in this newly published #JFS open-access article (@ExpertErrors): https://t.co/aZEZsiyugV https://t.co/PkoOfQrIZB
RT @JeffKukucka: Impressive new paper by @OJPNIJ's John Morgan scruitinizes "false or misleading forensic evidence" in @exonerationlist cas…
RT @JeffKukucka: Impressive new paper by @OJPNIJ's John Morgan scruitinizes "false or misleading forensic evidence" in @exonerationlist cas…
RT @innocencede: This study, which included the analysis of 1391 forensic examinations, demonstrates that most errors related to forensic s…
RT @innocencede: This study, which included the analysis of 1391 forensic examinations, demonstrates that most errors related to forensic s…
This study, which included the analysis of 1391 forensic examinations, demonstrates that most errors related to forensic science are frequently associated with incompetent or fraudulent examiners, and disciplines with an inadequate scientific foundation. https://t.co/BfqHeOsXdl
Wrongful convictions and claims of false or misleading forensic evidence https://t.co/SUjw00kHO9
RT @JeffKukucka: Impressive new paper by @OJPNIJ's John Morgan scruitinizes "false or misleading forensic evidence" in @exonerationlist cas…
RT @JeffKukucka: Impressive new paper by @OJPNIJ's John Morgan scruitinizes "false or misleading forensic evidence" in @exonerationlist cas…
RT @JeffKukucka: Impressive new paper by @OJPNIJ's John Morgan scruitinizes "false or misleading forensic evidence" in @exonerationlist cas…
RT @JeffKukucka: Impressive new paper by @OJPNIJ's John Morgan scruitinizes "false or misleading forensic evidence" in @exonerationlist cas…
Impressive new paper by @OJPNIJ's John Morgan scruitinizes "false or misleading forensic evidence" in @exonerationlist cases
RT @GacetaCienForen: https://t.co/n81RHRNamM
The Journal of Forensic Sciences has published my comprehensive study, Wrongful convictions and claims of false or misleading forensic evidence, https://t.co/DkQKVAZgir.
https://t.co/n81RHRNamM
Wrongful convictions and claims of false or misleading forensic evidence https://t.co/WKs5Y0sqdW