Synopsis of Social media discussions

Several discussions cite the study's findings about the high false-positive rate and the need to reevaluate testing protocols, with phrases like 'significant implications for diagnosis' and 'urgent need for improvement.' The tone is serious and reflective, emphasizing the importance of accurate testing methods for public health.

A
Agreement
Moderate agreement

Most discussions acknowledge the validity of the study and agree on concerns about the accuracy of HIV testing in Nigeria.

I
Interest
Moderate level of interest

Participants show moderate interest, discussing methodological details and implications for public health.

E
Engagement
Moderate level of engagement

Comments include references to the testing algorithms and potential improvements, indicating a thoughtful engagement.

I
Impact
Moderate level of impact

The discussions highlight the importance of accurate HIV testing, suggesting a meaningful impact on healthcare practices.

Social Mentions

YouTube

1 Videos

Twitter

1 Posts

Metrics

Video Views

26

Total Likes

2

Extended Reach

11,043

Social Features

2

Timeline: Posts about article

Top Social Media Posts

Posts referencing the article

Evaluating the Effectiveness of Nigeria's HIV Rapid Testing Algorithm

Evaluating the Effectiveness of Nigeria's HIV Rapid Testing Algorithm

The Nigeria HIV/AIDS Indicator and Impact Survey (NAIIS) in 2018 assessed the performance of the national HIV rapid testing algorithm, revealing a high false-positive rate of 55%. The study tested nearly 205,000 people and confirmed HIV status with additional tests, highlighting the need for improved testing protocols.

June 22, 2023

26 views


  • PLOS Global Public Health
    @PLOSGPH (Twitter)

    Hetal K. Patel et al conducted retrospective analysis of the performance of HIV rapid tests and the national HIV testing algorithm used in Nigeria. https://t.co/OGgrzZwzdv https://t.co/XqIiCtdtYE
    view full post

    August 4, 2022

    2

    1

Abstract Synopsis

  • The Nigeria HIV/AIDS Indicator and Impact Survey (NAIIS) conducted in 2018 evaluated how well the national HIV rapid testing algorithm works, finding that it has a high false-positive rate of around 55%, which affects the accuracy of HIV diagnosis.
  • The survey tested nearly 205,000 participants and confirmed HIV status using additional tests like Geenius HIV1/2 and Western blot, revealing that about 95% of those initially identified as HIV-positive by the algorithm truly had HIV, but there was significant inconsistency between the initial rapid tests.
  • The study suggests that the current testing method in Nigeria may lead to misdiagnosis, highlighting the need for further evaluation and possible improvements to the HIV testing protocols to ensure more accurate diagnosis in routine HIV testing services.]