Mentions
Extended reach
Total likes
Video views
AI synopsis
Many participants referenced the study's claim about differing safety profiles based on batches of the vaccine, such as discussions highlighting the serious adverse event rates and categorizing batches into safe or dangerous. Phrases like 'game changer' and 'Russian roulette' were used to underscore the perceived severity of the findings, contributing to a tone of urgency and concern regarding public health safety.
The majority of discussions reflect a general support for the findings of the publication, indicating that many users believe in the potential issues raised about batch variability in vaccine safety.
There is a high level of curiosity about the study, as many participants reference specific details and implications, suggesting that the topic resonates widely.
Discussions are in-depth, with multiple users elaborating on the findings and sharing sources, demonstrating a strong engagement with the data and its potential ramifications.
The sentiment indicates that many participants view the findings as highly influential, sparking discussions about vaccine safety and public health policies.
The most dangerous COVID-19 vaccines were from the original primary series administered in 2021. Schmeling et al: https://t.co/KMl4KpC8gh Manniche et al: https://t.co/149Rw1rUDT @P_McCulloughMD on the Patriot Strong Podcast Watch the full episode: https://t.co/jpST4vl45S https://t.co/ge94slWUMZ
SOURCES 1. "How Bad is My Batch?" tool by Craig Paardekooper: https://t.co/gRAwITXgZL 2. Manniche (@MannicheVibeke) et al: https://t.co/rvJrzKPf9u 3. Jablonowski and Hooker (@BrianHookerPhD): https://t.co/2gLW0epF1P 4. Fürst et al: https://t.co/t0kMYPNrLy
When we published our study https://t.co/utANVZtHXh showing that the Pfizer C-19 vaccine had three different adverse reaction profiles, we were severely attacked, by SSI, Pfizer, and several Danish politicians. Now a Czech study: https://t.co/9Pf3Ygapp2 shows the same pattern.
Thanks for posting https://t.co/ks3z5oTL8q https://t.co/Fl5x1vT2tZ
(2/3) Ce qui indique qu'il ne s'agit pas d'incidents isolés mais d'une préoccupation importante Schmeling a cosigné 2 articles : 1. Schmeling, M. et al. (2023) Batch-dependent safety of the BNT162b2 mRNA COVID-19 vaccine. Eur. J. Clin. Invest. p. e13998 https://t.co/dWkSowTyOj
Thanks @RWMaloneMD for sharing the worries about batchdependency - which we have shown on both danish and swedish data - it proves that the lots were changed along the Way https://t.co/ks3z5oUiXY https://t.co/Fl5x1vTAjx
The study investigates how different batches of the BNT162b2 mRNA COVID-19 vaccine may vary in terms of safety and potential adverse effects. Findings suggest that batch-specific safety evaluations are crucial for…
This video features a discussion with Dr. Vibeke Manniche and John about abuse and threats faced while navigating scientific discourse. It centers on the significant findings of how different batches of the BNT162b2…
This video discusses the differences in safety across various batches of the BNT162b2 mRNA COVID-19 vaccine. The study highlights how certain batches may pose higher risks for specific side effects, emphasizing the need…
Dr John Campbell critiques a Danish study claiming differences in adverse effects of vaccine batches. This video, featuring Dr Susan Oliver, explores the necessity of analyzing batch-specific data to ensure public trust…
@tote_chite_ta たぶんロットのことなんだろうけど、ねーよそんなもん https://t.co/WDv5rdnzmI
@AndiRkn @Coolnasenbaer Dänische Studie Peer reviewed zu den Nebenwirkungen verschiedener Chargen. (Schmeling et al., 2023. DOI: 10.1111/eci.13998). Dazu gab es eine Anfrage : https://t.co/G3dtI4H3Pt
@cyrus_razavi @stkirsch https://t.co/shYWOahkpB
@RRomani1973 @fabiominelli https://t.co/K14m8xK7zB bravo inizia a leggere anche se sono tante parole puoi farcela.
@Eikey1729 @jedishaman @DrNeilStone There actually is a batch-dependent study that concluded there were 3 types of batches based on adverse events. Almost zero AE batches, moderate/standard AE batches, and high AE batches. https://t.co/YDqAHuzBLa
@DrNeilStone Lucky with your batch? Why this matters? S. findings of Schmeling et al. in 2023 https://t.co/Qjx6dzROlI
"En conclusión, los resultados sugieren la existencia de una señal de seguridad dependiente del lote para la vacuna BNT162b2, y se justifican más estudios para explorar esta observación preliminar y sus consecuencias". https://t.co/X2bZ4jP0TC
@ProfStefanKraus @LibertyHannes @RationalEntity Konifere? Sie meine wahrscheinlich "Koryphäe" oder? Studien belegen, dass es sehr harmlose und gefährliche Chargen gab. Prof. Dyker Uni Bochum+ Prof. Dr. Jörg Matysik Uni Leipzig: Studie der Uni Kopenhagen https://t.co/l5zexe2z5b
Hoe zou dat nou komen? De studie van Manniche & Schmeling (EJCI, doi:10.1111/eci.13998) keek naar verschillen in gemelde bijwerkingen per batch. Ze zagen dat sommige batches veel meer meldingen hadden, maar de batches zijn niet willekeurig verstrekt (eerste batches gingen bv. https://t.co/UKcZ7oliKj
RT @MannicheVibeke: @DrJBhattacharya @veen_els The same situation in Denmark with prominent politicians in front. I was myself a victim. Ce…
RT @MannicheVibeke: https://t.co/ks3z5oUiXY
RT @SHomburg: Hintergrund meines Tweets ist diese begutachtete Studie. Sie zeigt, dass es ganz harmlose Chargen gab (gelb). Und außerordent…
@Ikwil_watzeggen @De_NieuweWereld https://t.co/twovV6kd0U https://t.co/8lxb2yEJhp https://t.co/Cbt16sduPz https://t.co/YObkljCAT4 https://t.co/6yrHdqBlsI https://t.co/Yb2Z7MQYpd https://t.co/K7eZIB5ERs https://t.co/tds5MoJUfC Wil je nog meer?
RT @joshg99: In addition, a recent Danish study found significant variability in the rate of serious adverse events across 52 different lot…
@Ivana202020 Batch Dependent safety of the BNT162b2 mRNA COVID-19 vaccine https://t.co/okY5iyxHKY https://t.co/NkSjECn8Xd
RT @McCulloughFund: NEW STUDY - Batch-dependent safety of the BNT162b2 mRNA COVID-19 vaccine in the United States The highest Suspected Ad…
@ykbenzen @nobu_conscience 投稿者の主張は、Furst、Manniche、Jablonowskiの3つの査読済み調査に基づいています。 - Manniche et al.: https://t.co/ONwlP70QXD (デンマーク・スウェーデン比較) - Furst: チェコ共和国のバッチ安全性研究 (例: PubMed 38937903) - Jablonowski: 米国VAERS分析 (https://t.co/Ms3ClJqMOG)
@HarmonyUsInc @grok Here's a study published by Wiley, showing it is entirely batch dependent whether you have an adverse event or not. That's pretty fucking definitive of what the cause is. https://t.co/HbTeZXeKEZ
@Oumuamua8 @coolfonpl Wszyscy, którzy rzucili sie w pierwszym terminie dostali najgorszą berbeluchę. https://t.co/xGUjOUWtgO https://t.co/vaecql7EwP
RT @joshg99: In addition, a recent Danish study found significant variability in the rate of serious adverse events across 52 different lot…
RT @DrSusanOliver1: The batch adverse event claims in the “Danish Paper” were bad enough, but Dr John Campbell has added a new level of rid…
@Marqs61628502 @e_munich @SHomburg Falls Sie auf die unterschiedlichen (Neben)wirkungen verschiedener Chargen anspielen: dies legt nahe, dass ein Großteil davon Pacebo war. https://t.co/2LOX974GBE
RT @j_sato: ロットによる品質・副作用のばらつきがやっと論文に https://t.co/T99OQN3ExX
RT @ikeyo1965: 【ファイザーワクチン副作用、ロットによる頻度の差】 （デンマークの研究：国の医薬品庁公式データに基づく） https://t.co/QGoa0hJ9Gk ◆各ポイント：ワクチンのバッチ(ロット) ◆横軸：ロット内投与回数 ◆縦軸：ロットあたり副作…
@DanaC206 Good point. It seems that the prospective randomized data that we have does not support the statement that the vaccine saved lives. We do however have data to show that the frequency of complications from the vaccine is batch dependent https://t.co/lyHeobwlzQ
@KalmiaLatifolia @TolenRebecca Study shows frequency of complications from Covid vaccine are batch dependent. https://t.co/lyHeobwlzQ
@NoEatingDogs Frequency of complications from the Covid vaccine are batch dependent. https://t.co/lyHeobwlzQ
another study proving https://t.co/wvGOTWyLrV has 100% been on the right track since the very beginning.. Batch-dependent safety of the BNT162b2 mRNA COVID-19 vaccine https://t.co/Ncr5c5lAss
@KingTychoiii Frequency of complications from the Covid vaccine varies depending on the batch. https://t.co/lyHeobwlzQ
@GlowplugvRay Frequency of complications with the Covid Vaccine are batch dependent https://t.co/lyHeobwlzQ
@MarkDeSilets1 Yes but the toxicity of Hemlock is consistent when given at the same concentrations. The complications of the Covid Vaccine are batch dependent https://t.co/lyHeobwlzQ
@Jeff23086418382 @TPBlue4 @grok The Vaccine used for the study was made in a lab. The commercial version was made in a factory. Complications from the Covid Vaccine made in the factory are batch dependent. https://t.co/lyHeobwlzQ
@AltenbergLee @Rob66733000 Complications from the Vaccine are batch dependent. https://t.co/lyHeobwlzQ
@amyowl73 Statistics: Complications from the Covid Vaccine are batch dependent. https://t.co/lyHeobwlzQ
@ChrisDPisan @AltenbergLee It depends on the batch. Complication from Covid Vaccine are batch dependent. https://t.co/lyHeobwlzQ
Chargenabhängige Sicherheit des mRNA-Impfstoffs BNT162b2 gegen COVID-19 Batch-dependent safety of the BNT162b2 mRNA COVID-19 vaccine https://t.co/8GLTq31ZaC https://t.co/CVDMCDWk8b
Chargenabhängige Sicherheit des mRNA-Impfstoffs BNT162b2 gegen COVID-19 Batch-dependent safety of the BNT162b2 mRNA COVID-19 vaccine https://t.co/CVDMCDWk8b
@barriere_dr Même les danois sont complotistes. https://t.co/ITtkyYSDQp https://t.co/z5mcGbCBGO
@homelessdave89 @elcolondallas here dumbass https://t.co/HgOpzQZ7Bv
@thereal_truther https://t.co/Kcy32QGSKQ
@prinporinparin ＞超過死も、その面積に比例する必要があります。 その面積には比例しないのです 先に打たれたワクチンほど危険です 先行接種分は何倍も人が死んでます https://t.co/SKsSsycRzP ここの詳細は、情報開示請求によるデータの 論文を待ちますが https://t.co/NzFeGFipwq https://t.co/uDPzIdco6T
RT @ikeyo1965: 【ファイザーワクチン副作用、ロットによる頻度の差】 （デンマークの研究：国の医薬品庁公式データに基づく） https://t.co/QGoa0hJ9Gk ◆各ポイント：ワクチンのバッチ(ロット) ◆横軸：ロット内投与回数 ◆縦軸：ロットあたり副作…
@grok @willPS21 @John37866 @masunobom @VaccineMole @SuperGrok @grok https://t.co/Ecz2C8OnCR
@grok @willPS21 @John37866 @masunobom @VaccineMole @SuperGrok https://t.co/Ecz2C8OVsp
RT @TheChiefNerd: Full Investigation: https://t.co/PHY3ZK5cmV
"Tanskalaisessa tutkimuksessa on havaittu koronarokotteiden erissä olevan suuria eroavaisuuksia: hyviä eriä ja huonoja - mistä tietää,mikä on se turvallinen erä, että mielummin suosittelisi sitä turvallista" Loistava kysymys!
It also appears that what was tested for approval was different to what was deployed to the masses. A different process was required for scaling up. Further, batch variability seem to have been very high as reported back in 2023 (see Figure): https://t.co/q8Bxq1bZlq https://t.co/gF7H9Cwt6j https://t.co/rUmaBIrWZZ
@Logos_siochain @PETM55Mill @Maddy_2312 Desinfo-Account. Tja, wenn das „Chargen-Lotto“ war, dann war’s eher Bingo mit Zufallsrauschen. Link zum Research Letter: https://t.co/g80J80IREk
@derkleinem4711 @Totoro_derGeist Nach dieser Studie waren manche Chargen potentiell tödlich (blau, grün), die anderen nicht. https://t.co/JUbjJSnqKi https://t.co/ZPRPRIKHWi
@cremieuxrecueil Some batches were deadlier than others. Some people drew the lucky straws. https://t.co/BS6opoNeg2
@andreaskyriacou Das meinen Sie sicherlich ironisch, hat aber einen sehr realen Hintergrund. Es gab offensichtlich wirklich Placebo-Chargen. Die Ergebnisse dieser Studie aus Dänemark konnten übrigens in Schweden reproduziert werden. https://t.co/2LOX975erc
@ChrisEd16512812 @welcometheeagle @ClareCraigPath @FluoridePoison @Patent_SUN @JanciToxDoc @McfadyenRaelene @tatiann69922625 @NicHulscher @MDPIOpenAccess @drmelissamccann @MannicheVibeke @PaulaJardine https://t.co/RiTKpv8BIX
@andreaskyriacou Nachweislich eine Studie gab es erhebliche Unterschiede in der Gefährlichkeit bei 52 verschiedenen Impfstoffchargen. https://t.co/5syoIIM3sF
@CBGSpender Ist doch längst bekannt https://t.co/CI6BNzQk4E
@CBGSpender https://t.co/3ETIvxuONr
This was also reported in a paper from Denmark a couple of years ago. https://t.co/q8Bxq1bZlq https://t.co/NiAbDIGC2o https://t.co/rjD2DSWsV9
@ChrisEd16512812 @FluoridePoison @Patent_SUN @JanciToxDoc @McfadyenRaelene @tatiann69922625 @NicHulscher @MDPIOpenAccess @ClareCraigPath @drmelissamccann 2023 https://t.co/j70MGktVKM https://t.co/LdMPEpi7az
@LegitDonChi @EstherNL3 @GideonvMeijeren @fvdemocratie @Drvingerhoets @MarionKoopmans Dit is geen D66 wetenschap toch? Batch-dependent safety of the BNT162b2 mRNA COVID-19 vaccine - PubMed https://t.co/rpjJS3UoBf
@LegitDonChi @EstherNL3 @GideonvMeijeren @fvdemocratie @Drvingerhoets @MarionKoopmans Beslisnota bij Kamervragen over de Deense studie 'Batch-dependent safety of the BNT162b2 mRNA COVID-19 vaccine' | Beleidsnota | https://t.co/bIWCWMEagT https://t.co/2mzJibHHTB
@JustWazzaXRP @senatorbabet The shots were different. He was lucky. https://t.co/ZqyPjSR6PS
@DopplerEffect93 @Lorenzo7127 @Scary7Dr @higgsri @cappsie @WaitingForPerot @crabb_vicki @mass_rising @jojo_rn123 @NeverV82625 @drloveariyana @NurseMicheleRN @ChrisJohnsonMD @davideyoungmd @richykirsh @richardyoungMN @trillionofcells @BurgerLab12 @Earthdriver @iXeno @BlairHealt68622 @djt10 @PatrickSquirrel @CarlSmytheCells @SkepticalMutant @CaryDavid722 @exohalophiles @deerbrian @DemsRRacePimps @BlueLionBlog @FillmoreWhite @Alex_on_A14 @jtmayes3 @AndrewLazarus4 @ncdave4life @TMGFlorida @Roper_Lab @ktibus @SecedeFromFools @TorySnyc @dirk_fasshauer @RonMortimer3 @lasikeyecenter1 @Hanky1844607 @Awithonelison @NoGlobalist778 @EugeneBu @AcampbelTeacher @EdwardDS15 @VickiCoyle10019 Not very good at this, are you Covidian? "Unexpectedly, rates of SAEs per 1000 doses varied considerably between vaccine batches...." https://t.co/qOT5980IZz
RT @Meine__B: @EndTribalism Next to that, there were 3 different vaccins.. https://t.co/uP8rkwlZzo
RT @Leon1969: Batch dependent safety by lot numbers, USA version. Results: clustering around three groups and most adverse events in the fi…
Batch dependent safety by lot numbers, USA version. Results: clustering around three groups and most adverse events in the first two months. This proves again the quality differences of lots which for that part were not comparable. https://t.co/kOSb9ndtWk
@ChunkyMonkeyUSA Ask Grok to churn out words for you about this study you won't bother to read or attempt to understand https://t.co/XG6wwe1iF9
@EndTribalism Next to that, there were 3 different vaccins.. https://t.co/uP8rkwlZzo
RT @RealWsiegrist: Batch-dependent safety of the BNT162b2 mRNA COVID-19 vaccine BionTech schützte Mitarbeiter und Kooperationspartner durc…
@RotesSteinhaus @lalaensetzt @prof_freedom @Pauline__Voss https://t.co/5Vh5QKwJx1 Ich weiß, das PEI hat die Studie "widerlegt" ... Glauben sie einfach was sie wollen, ich kann damit leben.
@LiseLarsenDK @Birgitte1234 Batch studie: Hvem fik de dårlige batch og hvem fik saltvand? https://t.co/rcT3xOhcwu
RT @j_sato: ロットによる品質・副作用のばらつきがやっと論文に https://t.co/T99OQN3ExX
@hbunjes @ElefantImRaum2 Komisch. Nur in Deutschland? Nur weil sie es nicht wissen, heißt es nicht, daß es nicht existiert. Dänemark: https://t.co/ukzCJuHCFP
@accessa @ElefantImRaum2 Hier eine wissenschaftliche Quelle, welche die Aussage bestätigt: https://t.co/qH7fMLuoam
@JimFergusonUK This is not only a breach against GMP. It is MURDER! Read the Danish Study
RT @kinoshitayakuhi: 【デンマーク論文】ファイザー製ワクチンの副作用、ロットによる頻度の差は最大1,000倍（公開2023年3月30日） https://t.co/dpBRfYJmFT 研究者「ロシアンルーレットだ」 超危険ロット 4.22% 危険ロット…
RT @kinoshitayakuhi: 【デンマーク論文】ファイザー製ワクチンの副作用、ロットによる頻度の差は最大1,000倍（公開2023年3月30日） https://t.co/dpBRfYJmFT 研究者「ロシアンルーレットだ」 超危険ロット 4.22% 危険ロット…
RT @NicHulscher: SOURCES 1. "How Bad is My Batch?" tool by Craig Paardekooper: https://t.co/gRAwITXgZL 2. Manniche (@MannicheVibeke) et a…
@unhealthytruth @samgarzamd Here is an article from 9/2024. I posted the link to the entire article and a screenshot of the lot numbers with serious side effects. Very sad. https://t.co/jdGfX12CzT https://t.co/seP0eLosue
RT @SteveHylan55254: @NursePatsy16801 @toobaffled Patsy, some people were lucky. Deaths appear to be strongly correlated to specific batch…
Batch-dependent Safety of the BNT162b2 mRNA COVID-19 Vaccine in the United States - Science, Public Health Policy and the Law https://t.co/12QfF6rAG5
RT @SteveHylan55254: @NursePatsy16801 @toobaffled Patsy, some people were lucky. Deaths appear to be strongly correlated to specific batch…
RT @SteveHylan55254: @NursePatsy16801 @toobaffled Patsy, some people were lucky. Deaths appear to be strongly correlated to specific batch…
@NursePatsy16801 @toobaffled Patsy, some people were lucky. Deaths appear to be strongly correlated to specific batches. I’m happy to provide you with more information if you at all interested. Here’s a start - but it’s the same everywhere: https://t.co/UNazfgMIxn
https://t.co/GZWHDrnkTJ
RT @MannicheVibeke: Thanks for posting https://t.co/ks3z5oTL8q
RT @MannicheVibeke: Thanks for posting https://t.co/ks3z5oTL8q
RT @MannicheVibeke: Thanks for posting https://t.co/ks3z5oTL8q
RT @MannicheVibeke: Thanks @RWMaloneMD for sharing the worries about batchdependency - which we have shown on both danish and swedish data…
RT @MannicheVibeke: Thanks for posting https://t.co/ks3z5oTL8q
RT @MannicheVibeke: Thanks for posting https://t.co/ks3z5oTL8q
RT @MannicheVibeke: Thanks for posting https://t.co/ks3z5oTL8q
RT @MannicheVibeke: Thanks for posting https://t.co/ks3z5oTL8q
Thanks for posting https://t.co/ks3z5oTL8q https://t.co/Fl5x1vT2tZ
RT @MannicheVibeke: Thanks @RWMaloneMD for sharing the worries about batchdependency - which we have shown on both danish and swedish data…
RT @MannicheVibeke: Thanks @RWMaloneMD for sharing the worries about batchdependency - which we have shown on both danish and swedish data…
RT @MannicheVibeke: Thanks @RWMaloneMD for sharing the worries about batchdependency - which we have shown on both danish and swedish data…
Interessant: https://t.co/pImqM7xx32
RT @MannicheVibeke: Thanks @RWMaloneMD for sharing the worries about batchdependency - which we have shown on both danish and swedish data…
RT @MannicheVibeke: Thanks @RWMaloneMD for sharing the worries about batchdependency - which we have shown on both danish and swedish data…
RT @MannicheVibeke: Thanks @RWMaloneMD for sharing the worries about batchdependency - which we have shown on both danish and swedish data…
RT @MannicheVibeke: Thanks @RWMaloneMD for sharing the worries about batchdependency - which we have shown on both danish and swedish data…
RT @MannicheVibeke: Thanks @RWMaloneMD for sharing the worries about batchdependency - which we have shown on both danish and swedish data…
Thanks @RWMaloneMD for sharing the worries about batchdependency - which we have shown on both danish and swedish data - it proves that the lots were changed along the Way https://t.co/ks3z5oUiXY https://t.co/Fl5x1vTAjx
RT @NicHulscher: SOURCES 1. "How Bad is My Batch?" tool by Craig Paardekooper: https://t.co/gRAwITXgZL 2. Manniche (@MannicheVibeke) et a…
@elonmusk @grok This is extremely politically incorrect but data shows it's factually true. There were 3 separate doses of Pfizer covid vax. If there was 1 dose, there would be dots scattered around 1 line, not dots around 3 separate lines. https://t.co/DKFcRDyZ4t
@buzucan @EvolutiaR Sure
RT @joshg99: In addition, a recent Danish study found significant variability in the rate of serious adverse events across 52 different lot…
RT @NicHulscher: SOURCES 1. "How Bad is My Batch?" tool by Craig Paardekooper: https://t.co/gRAwITXgZL 2. Manniche (@MannicheVibeke) et a…
RT @NicHulscher: SOURCES 1. "How Bad is My Batch?" tool by Craig Paardekooper: https://t.co/gRAwITXgZL 2. Manniche (@MannicheVibeke) et a…
RT @NicHulscher: SOURCES 1. "How Bad is My Batch?" tool by Craig Paardekooper: https://t.co/gRAwITXgZL 2. Manniche (@MannicheVibeke) et a…
RT @NicHulscher: SOURCES 1. "How Bad is My Batch?" tool by Craig Paardekooper: https://t.co/gRAwITXgZL 2. Manniche (@MannicheVibeke) et a…
RT @NicHulscher: SOURCES 1. "How Bad is My Batch?" tool by Craig Paardekooper: https://t.co/gRAwITXgZL 2. Manniche (@MannicheVibeke) et a…
RT @NicHulscher: SOURCES 1. "How Bad is My Batch?" tool by Craig Paardekooper: https://t.co/gRAwITXgZL 2. Manniche (@MannicheVibeke) et a…
RT @NicHulscher: SOURCES 1. "How Bad is My Batch?" tool by Craig Paardekooper: https://t.co/gRAwITXgZL 2. Manniche (@MannicheVibeke) et a…
RT @NicHulscher: SOURCES 1. "How Bad is My Batch?" tool by Craig Paardekooper: https://t.co/gRAwITXgZL 2. Manniche (@MannicheVibeke) et a…
RT @NicHulscher: SOURCES 1. "How Bad is My Batch?" tool by Craig Paardekooper: https://t.co/gRAwITXgZL 2. Manniche (@MannicheVibeke) et a…
RT @NicHulscher: SOURCES 1. "How Bad is My Batch?" tool by Craig Paardekooper: https://t.co/gRAwITXgZL 2. Manniche (@MannicheVibeke) et a…
RT @NicHulscher: SOURCES: 1. https://t.co/rzpINyh15d 2. https://t.co/2gLW0epF1P 3. https://t.co/L7MAyUk92G
RT @NicHulscher: SOURCES: 1. https://t.co/rzpINyh15d 2. https://t.co/2gLW0epF1P 3. https://t.co/L7MAyUk92G
RT @NicHulscher: SOURCES 1. "How Bad is My Batch?" tool by Craig Paardekooper: https://t.co/gRAwITXgZL 2. Manniche (@MannicheVibeke) et a…
RT @NicHulscher: SOURCES 1. "How Bad is My Batch?" tool by Craig Paardekooper: https://t.co/gRAwITXgZL 2. Manniche (@MannicheVibeke) et a…
RT @NicHulscher: SOURCES 1. "How Bad is My Batch?" tool by Craig Paardekooper: https://t.co/gRAwITXgZL 2. Manniche (@MannicheVibeke) et a…
RT @NicHulscher: SOURCES 1. "How Bad is My Batch?" tool by Craig Paardekooper: https://t.co/gRAwITXgZL 2. Manniche (@MannicheVibeke) et a…
RT @NicHulscher: SOURCES 1. "How Bad is My Batch?" tool by Craig Paardekooper: https://t.co/gRAwITXgZL 2. Manniche (@MannicheVibeke) et a…
RT @NicHulscher: SOURCES 1. "How Bad is My Batch?" tool by Craig Paardekooper: https://t.co/gRAwITXgZL 2. Manniche (@MannicheVibeke) et a…
RT @NicHulscher: SOURCES 1. "How Bad is My Batch?" tool by Craig Paardekooper: https://t.co/gRAwITXgZL 2. Manniche (@MannicheVibeke) et a…
RT @NicHulscher: SOURCES 1. "How Bad is My Batch?" tool by Craig Paardekooper: https://t.co/gRAwITXgZL 2. Manniche (@MannicheVibeke) et a…
RT @NicHulscher: SOURCES 1. "How Bad is My Batch?" tool by Craig Paardekooper: https://t.co/gRAwITXgZL 2. Manniche (@MannicheVibeke) et a…
RT @NicHulscher: SOURCES: 1. https://t.co/rzpINyh15d 2. https://t.co/2gLW0epF1P 3. https://t.co/L7MAyUk92G
RT @NicHulscher: SOURCES 1. "How Bad is My Batch?" tool by Craig Paardekooper: https://t.co/gRAwITXgZL 2. Manniche (@MannicheVibeke) et a…
RT @NicHulscher: SOURCES 1. "How Bad is My Batch?" tool by Craig Paardekooper: https://t.co/gRAwITXgZL 2. Manniche (@MannicheVibeke) et a…
RT @NicHulscher: SOURCES 1. "How Bad is My Batch?" tool by Craig Paardekooper: https://t.co/gRAwITXgZL 2. Manniche (@MannicheVibeke) et a…
RT @NicHulscher: SOURCES: 1. https://t.co/rzpINyh15d 2. https://t.co/2gLW0epF1P 3. https://t.co/L7MAyUk92G
RT @NicHulscher: SOURCES 1. "How Bad is My Batch?" tool by Craig Paardekooper: https://t.co/gRAwITXgZL 2. Manniche (@MannicheVibeke) et a…
RT @NicHulscher: SOURCES: 1. https://t.co/rzpINyh15d 2. https://t.co/2gLW0epF1P 3. https://t.co/L7MAyUk92G
RT @NicHulscher: SOURCES 1. "How Bad is My Batch?" tool by Craig Paardekooper: https://t.co/gRAwITXgZL 2. Manniche (@MannicheVibeke) et a…
RT @NicHulscher: SOURCES 1. "How Bad is My Batch?" tool by Craig Paardekooper: https://t.co/gRAwITXgZL 2. Manniche (@MannicheVibeke) et a…
RT @NicHulscher: SOURCES: 1. https://t.co/rzpINyh15d 2. https://t.co/2gLW0epF1P 3. https://t.co/L7MAyUk92G
RT @NicHulscher: SOURCES: 1. https://t.co/rzpINyh15d 2. https://t.co/2gLW0epF1P 3. https://t.co/L7MAyUk92G
RT @NicHulscher: SOURCES 1. "How Bad is My Batch?" tool by Craig Paardekooper: https://t.co/gRAwITXgZL 2. Manniche (@MannicheVibeke) et a…
RT @NicHulscher: SOURCES 1. "How Bad is My Batch?" tool by Craig Paardekooper: https://t.co/gRAwITXgZL 2. Manniche (@MannicheVibeke) et a…
RT @NicHulscher: SOURCES 1. "How Bad is My Batch?" tool by Craig Paardekooper: https://t.co/gRAwITXgZL 2. Manniche (@MannicheVibeke) et a…
RT @NicHulscher: SOURCES 1. "How Bad is My Batch?" tool by Craig Paardekooper: https://t.co/gRAwITXgZL 2. Manniche (@MannicheVibeke) et a…
RT @NicHulscher: SOURCES 1. "How Bad is My Batch?" tool by Craig Paardekooper: https://t.co/gRAwITXgZL 2. Manniche (@MannicheVibeke) et a…
RT @NicHulscher: SOURCES: 1. https://t.co/rzpINyh15d 2. https://t.co/2gLW0epF1P 3. https://t.co/L7MAyUk92G
RT @NicHulscher: SOURCES: 1. https://t.co/rzpINyh15d 2. https://t.co/2gLW0epF1P 3. https://t.co/L7MAyUk92G
RT @NicHulscher: SOURCES: 1. https://t.co/rzpINyh15d 2. https://t.co/2gLW0epF1P 3. https://t.co/L7MAyUk92G
RT @NicHulscher: SOURCES 1. "How Bad is My Batch?" tool by Craig Paardekooper: https://t.co/gRAwITXgZL 2. Manniche (@MannicheVibeke) et a…
SOURCES 1. "How Bad is My Batch?" tool by Craig Paardekooper: https://t.co/gRAwITXgZL 2. Manniche (@MannicheVibeke) et al: https://t.co/rvJrzKPf9u 3. Jablonowski and Hooker (@BrianHookerPhD): https://t.co/2gLW0epF1P 4. Fürst et al: https://t.co/t0kMYPNrLy
@ProfDuckDuckGo @SecKennedy "In conclusion, the results suggest the existence of a batch-dependent safety signal for the BNT162b2 vaccine, and more studies are warranted to explore this preliminary observation and its consequences." https://t.co/Ecz2C8OVsp
@Knatterton17 @SHomburg "Chargenabhängige Sicherheit des mRNA-COVID-19-Impfstoffs BNT162b2" [2] Zusätzlich noch der Verweis auf andere, bereits bestehende Studien, auf das "Russisch Roulette" bei der Verteilung und Verimpfung der einzelnen Chargen. https://t.co/1KNRg0Dbit
RT @Markus379013541: @SHomburg Dies wurde ja bereits Anfang 2023 in einer Studie aus Dänemark gezeigt. Wurde natürlich heftigst als junk sc…
@SHomburg Dies wurde ja bereits Anfang 2023 in einer Studie aus Dänemark gezeigt. Wurde natürlich heftigst als junk science diskreditiert - um dann später in Schweden und Tschechien reproduziert zu werden. https://t.co/2LOX974GBE
@SHomburg Diese dänische Studie zeigte schon vor 2 Jahren sehr eindrucksvoll die chargenabhängige Sicherheit des Biontech-Impfstoffes auf: https://t.co/Q4qyRrzl3s
RT @CartlandDavid: Batch-dependent Safety of the BNT162b2 mRNA COVID-19 Vaccine in the United States - Science, Public Health Policy and th…
RT @CartlandDavid: Batch-dependent Safety of the BNT162b2 mRNA COVID-19 Vaccine in the United States - Science, Public Health Policy and th…
RT @CartlandDavid: Batch-dependent Safety of the BNT162b2 mRNA COVID-19 Vaccine in the United States - Science, Public Health Policy and th…
RT @CartlandDavid: Batch-dependent Safety of the BNT162b2 mRNA COVID-19 Vaccine in the United States - Science, Public Health Policy and th…
RT @CartlandDavid: Batch-dependent Safety of the BNT162b2 mRNA COVID-19 Vaccine in the United States - Science, Public Health Policy and th…
RT @CartlandDavid: Batch-dependent Safety of the BNT162b2 mRNA COVID-19 Vaccine in the United States - Science, Public Health Policy and th…
Batch-dependent Safety of the BNT162b2 mRNA COVID-19 Vaccine in the United States - Science, Public Health Policy and the Law https://t.co/VrK8soBd6C
RT @ikeyo1965: 【ファイザーワクチン副作用、ロットによる頻度の差】 （デンマークの研究：国の医薬品庁公式データに基づく） https://t.co/QGoa0hJ9Gk ◆各ポイント：ワクチンのバッチ(ロット) ◆横軸：ロット内投与回数 ◆縦軸：ロットあたり副作…
RT @jisukewizon: @ZcjLPlFrBpslUCe @BikkuriSeitai @studiocorvo ロットでの差異はないよ https://t.co/t7lHRrdI9d
@ZcjLPlFrBpslUCe @BikkuriSeitai @studiocorvo ロットでの差異はないよ https://t.co/t7lHRrdI9d
RT @JoakimMarias: @FredricMorenius Här har ni mer från Danska forskaren som de vägra publicera datan åt. På de doserna som distribuerades i…
@FredricMorenius Här har ni mer från Danska forskaren som de vägra publicera datan åt. På de doserna som distribuerades i Scandinavien. https://t.co/eFRRzTDXNF
RT @FredDesgrottes: @CorinneDon7403 @PetitColibrii Une étude américaine de 2024 en parle aussi : https://t.co/tmo3LQUB9a
@CorinneDon7403 @PetitColibrii Une étude américaine de 2024 en parle aussi : https://t.co/tmo3LQUB9a
@PO1tClkrnTlznsi @higamix2024 @GoodBye_Nuclear ちなみに、このデンマークの論文は、母数は接種数です。 確かに高齢者が多く打った時期だから等の交絡因子がある可能性もありますが、死亡は副反応疑い報告ですから、ワクチンによる死亡だと疑われた死亡です。 https://t.co/q4X5a9bbfz https://t.co/8loivszNXS
@Revert04 @nikasfight @GuntherEagleman https://t.co/A4LN8cadp3
Batch-dependent Safety of the BNT162b2 mRNA COVID-19 Vaccine in the United States - Science, Public Health Policy and the Law https://t.co/bAN9DJKqNt
@william_be96721 @stkirsch In this Danish study made by VACCINE SCEPTIC people! It shows that only 0,03% of ALL vaccinated people in Denmark reported an SAE (suspected adverse event) And of those only 0,08% were servere! https://t.co/cEKquzTddi
RT @j_sato: ロットによる品質・副作用のばらつきがやっと論文に https://t.co/T99OQN3ExX
@grok @MikeHuntHurts89 @NielsFuglsang @grok You say it is based on informed consent. According to Max Schmellings study an informed consent couldn't be given due to variation in the batches. https://t.co/wQaO7hI9hT
@slob924 @Kevin_McKernan @JohnBeaudoinSr I think it applies globally. Here’s a paper addressing it but there are more that I haven’t got time to find https://t.co/VyHzHkIvtO
RT @kinoshitayakuhi: 因みに、デンマーク論文によれば、ワクチンは3タイプに分かれていたそうです。 研究者「ロシアンルーレットだ」 超危険ロット 4.22% 危険ロット 63.69% 安全ロット 32.00% 資料はデンマーク医薬品庁のデ…
@k_eynak @RichardHanania https://t.co/aQsktK4zyZ This?
"En conclusión, los resultados sugieren la existencia de una señal de seguridad dependiente del lote para la vacuna BNT162b2, y se justifican más estudios para explorar esta observación preliminar y sus consecuencias". https://t.co/X2bZ4jOt44
RT @GabinJean3: Danemark: chaque point est un lot de vaccin Pfizer. L'axe horizontal: le nombre de doses du lot. L'axe vertical, le nombre…
@sinebalta @kio_tanaka それなのに、それで中立だと思っているの？客観的なものであれ、その客観的とされるものを用いる人間の主観に依存して問題が起きている。客観性を独占しているつもり？そんな事さえも知らないの？そういや前にBNT162b2のロット差の問題も指摘されていたのがあったな。5/ https://t.co/c8dOSk6sN9
Danish study - significant variability in serious adverse event rates across 52 different lots of Comirnaty. https://t.co/7SDsQB7eYS
@PatologJacob https://t.co/ZTlyK9otW6 Det skulle være denne
Batch-dependent safety of the BNT162b2 mRNA COVID-19 vaccine in the United States https://t.co/OK9eSIDaWP
RT @NicHulscher: Jablonowski and Hooker: https://t.co/2gLW0epF1P How Bad is My Batch Search Tool by Craig Paardekooper: https://t.co/gRAwI…
RT @NicHulscher: Jablonowski and Hooker: https://t.co/2gLW0epF1P How Bad is My Batch Search Tool by Craig Paardekooper: https://t.co/gRAwI…
RT @NicHulscher: Jablonowski and Hooker: https://t.co/2gLW0epF1P How Bad is My Batch Search Tool by Craig Paardekooper: https://t.co/gRAwI…
RT @NicHulscher: Jablonowski and Hooker: https://t.co/2gLW0epF1P How Bad is My Batch Search Tool by Craig Paardekooper: https://t.co/gRAwI…
RT @NicHulscher: Jablonowski and Hooker: https://t.co/2gLW0epF1P How Bad is My Batch Search Tool by Craig Paardekooper: https://t.co/gRAwI…
RT @CartlandDavid: @rustyrockets https://t.co/6clkPaCzns ******************* https://t.co/VrK8soBd6C Autoimmune and Neoplastic Outcomes …
RT @CartlandDavid: @rustyrockets https://t.co/6clkPaCzns ******************* https://t.co/VrK8soBd6C Autoimmune and Neoplastic Outcomes …
@rustyrockets https://t.co/6clkPaCzns ******************* https://t.co/VrK8soBd6C Autoimmune and Neoplastic Outcomes After the mRNA Vaccination: The Role of T Regulatory Cell Response https://t.co/r5yalExNuA SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccine-related myocarditis and pericarditis: An analysis of
Batch‐dependent safety of the BNT162b2 mRNA COVID‐19 vaccine - Schmeling - 2023 - European Journal of Clinical Investigation - Wiley Online Library https://t.co/W1q1ckSLLd
RT @NicHulscher: Jablonowski and Hooker: https://t.co/2gLW0epF1P How Bad is My Batch Search Tool by Craig Paardekooper: https://t.co/gRAwI…
RT @CartlandDavid: Batch‐dependent safety of the BNT162b2 mRNA COVID‐19 vaccine - Schmeling - 2023 - European Journal of Clinical Investiga…
RT @CartlandDavid: Batch‐dependent safety of the BNT162b2 mRNA COVID‐19 vaccine - Schmeling - 2023 - European Journal of Clinical Investiga…
Batch‐dependent safety of the BNT162b2 mRNA COVID‐19 vaccine - Schmeling - 2023 - European Journal of Clinical Investigation - Wiley Online Library https://t.co/W1q1ckSLLd
RT @CartlandDavid: Batch-dependent safety of the BNT162b2 mRNA COVID-19 vaccine in the United States - Science, Public Health Policy and th…
RT @CartlandDavid: Batch‐dependent safety of the BNT162b2 mRNA COVID‐19 vaccine - Schmeling - 2023 - European Journal of Clinical Investiga…
RT @NicHulscher: Jablonowski and Hooker: https://t.co/2gLW0epF1P How Bad is My Batch Search Tool by Craig Paardekooper: https://t.co/gRAwI…
RT @CartlandDavid: Batch‐dependent safety of the BNT162b2 mRNA COVID‐19 vaccine - Schmeling - 2023 - European Journal of Clinical Investiga…
RT @CartlandDavid: Batch‐dependent safety of the BNT162b2 mRNA COVID‐19 vaccine - Schmeling - 2023 - European Journal of Clinical Investiga…
RT @CartlandDavid: Batch‐dependent safety of the BNT162b2 mRNA COVID‐19 vaccine - Schmeling - 2023 - European Journal of Clinical Investiga…
RT @CartlandDavid: Batch-dependent safety of the BNT162b2 mRNA COVID-19 vaccine in the United States - Science, Public Health Policy and th…
RT @CartlandDavid: Batch-dependent safety of the BNT162b2 mRNA COVID-19 vaccine in the United States - Science, Public Health Policy and th…
RT @CartlandDavid: Batch‐dependent safety of the BNT162b2 mRNA COVID‐19 vaccine - Schmeling - 2023 - European Journal of Clinical Investiga…
RT @CartlandDavid: Batch-dependent safety of the BNT162b2 mRNA COVID-19 vaccine in the United States - Science, Public Health Policy and th…
Batch‐dependent safety of the BNT162b2 mRNA COVID‐19 vaccine - Schmeling - 2023 - European Journal of Clinical Investigation - Wiley Online Library https://t.co/W1q1ckSLLd
Batch-dependent safety of the BNT162b2 mRNA COVID-19 vaccine in the United States - Science, Public Health Policy and the Law https://t.co/VrK8soBd6C
RT @Max___Schmeling: When we published our study https://t.co/utANVZtHXh showing that the Pfizer C-19 vaccine had three different adverse r…
RT @dancalegria: Dan nog even voor de volledigheid de batch afhankelijkheid die nu in minimaal 4 studies is gevonden. https://t.co/yrZhHcm…
RT @dancalegria: Dan nog even voor de volledigheid de batch afhankelijkheid die nu in minimaal 4 studies is gevonden. https://t.co/yrZhHcm…
RT @dancalegria: Dan nog even voor de volledigheid de batch afhankelijkheid die nu in minimaal 4 studies is gevonden. https://t.co/yrZhHcm…
RT @dancalegria: Dan nog even voor de volledigheid de batch afhankelijkheid die nu in minimaal 4 studies is gevonden. https://t.co/yrZhHcm…
RT @dancalegria: Dan nog even voor de volledigheid de batch afhankelijkheid die nu in minimaal 4 studies is gevonden. https://t.co/yrZhHcm…
RT @dancalegria: Dan nog even voor de volledigheid de batch afhankelijkheid die nu in minimaal 4 studies is gevonden. https://t.co/yrZhHcm…
RT @dancalegria: Dan nog even voor de volledigheid de batch afhankelijkheid die nu in minimaal 4 studies is gevonden. https://t.co/yrZhHcm…
RT @dancalegria: Dan nog even voor de volledigheid de batch afhankelijkheid die nu in minimaal 4 studies is gevonden. https://t.co/yrZhHcm…
Dan nog even voor de volledigheid de batch afhankelijkheid die nu in minimaal 4 studies is gevonden. https://t.co/yrZhHcmcMs Het artikel van Vibeke Manniche en Max Smeling waarmee ik samen in Straatsburg de persconferentie heb gehouden (zie bovenaan mijn X account)
@IC4R0S1 @YellowHideaway @PetteriOrpo @sannigrahn @KaisaJuuso @EijaPelkonen @mika_salminen Et sitten viitsinyt katsoa lähteitä aikapommi? https://t.co/vximFtmPjk https://t.co/aVtg0AcibO https://t.co/dK5KsPpweq https://t.co/ctcMr4uEWm https://t.co/l9VkbB1wLz https://t.co/nJ6YWKTJbJ https://t.co/XmNcMZ720g
@Paul88139390 @Simon_Rozendaal Oh ja? Kun je even aangeven waar dit De / Zwe onderzoek dat dit aantoont de plank misslaat? En voor het Cz onderzoek met dezelfde conclusies? Geen inhoudelijk antwoord is "check mate normy slaaf kan niet zelf denken". https://t.co/HHflYfsjnH
@MannicheVibeke @SeeLight399563 @P_McCulloughMD @drcole12 @DrAseemMalhotra @stkirsch @RobertKennedyJr @elonmusk @JesslovesMJK @ClareCraigPath https://t.co/onRDiJwlYQ
@JumpinJanet60 @BretWeinstein How bad is my lot is one site. The Schmeling paper is another. @MannicheVibeke https://t.co/CdIONotewb
@FakeDoctorReal1 https://t.co/Yu155XLHvO
- Este artículo corrobora las observaciones de Schmeling et al ( https://t.co/iYS6pSMiVW
RT @McCulloughFund: The most dangerous COVID-19 vaccines were from the original primary series administered in 2021. Schmeling et al: https…
RT @McCulloughFund: The most dangerous COVID-19 vaccines were from the original primary series administered in 2021. Schmeling et al: https…
RT @McCulloughFund: The most dangerous COVID-19 vaccines were from the original primary series administered in 2021. Schmeling et al: https…
RT @McCulloughFund: The most dangerous COVID-19 vaccines were from the original primary series administered in 2021. Schmeling et al: https…
RT @McCulloughFund: The most dangerous COVID-19 vaccines were from the original primary series administered in 2021. Schmeling et al: https…
RT @McCulloughFund: The most dangerous COVID-19 vaccines were from the original primary series administered in 2021. Schmeling et al: https…
RT @McCulloughFund: The most dangerous COVID-19 vaccines were from the original primary series administered in 2021. Schmeling et al: https…
RT @McCulloughFund: The most dangerous COVID-19 vaccines were from the original primary series administered in 2021. Schmeling et al: https…
RT @McCulloughFund: The most dangerous COVID-19 vaccines were from the original primary series administered in 2021. Schmeling et al: https…
RT @McCulloughFund: The most dangerous COVID-19 vaccines were from the original primary series administered in 2021. Schmeling et al: https…
RT @McCulloughFund: The most dangerous COVID-19 vaccines were from the original primary series administered in 2021. Schmeling et al: https…
RT @McCulloughFund: The most dangerous COVID-19 vaccines were from the original primary series administered in 2021. Schmeling et al: https…
RT @McCulloughFund: The most dangerous COVID-19 vaccines were from the original primary series administered in 2021. Schmeling et al: https…
RT @McCulloughFund: The most dangerous COVID-19 vaccines were from the original primary series administered in 2021. Schmeling et al: https…
RT @McCulloughFund: The most dangerous COVID-19 vaccines were from the original primary series administered in 2021. Schmeling et al: https…
RT @McCulloughFund: The most dangerous COVID-19 vaccines were from the original primary series administered in 2021. Schmeling et al: https…
RT @McCulloughFund: The most dangerous COVID-19 vaccines were from the original primary series administered in 2021. Schmeling et al: https…
RT @McCulloughFund: The most dangerous COVID-19 vaccines were from the original primary series administered in 2021. Schmeling et al: https…
RT @McCulloughFund: The most dangerous COVID-19 vaccines were from the original primary series administered in 2021. Schmeling et al: https…
RT @McCulloughFund: The most dangerous COVID-19 vaccines were from the original primary series administered in 2021. Schmeling et al: https…
RT @McCulloughFund: The most dangerous COVID-19 vaccines were from the original primary series administered in 2021. Schmeling et al: https…
RT @McCulloughFund: The most dangerous COVID-19 vaccines were from the original primary series administered in 2021. Schmeling et al: https…
RT @McCulloughFund: The most dangerous COVID-19 vaccines were from the original primary series administered in 2021. Schmeling et al: https…
RT @McCulloughFund: The most dangerous COVID-19 vaccines were from the original primary series administered in 2021. Schmeling et al: https…
RT @McCulloughFund: The most dangerous COVID-19 vaccines were from the original primary series administered in 2021. Schmeling et al: https…
RT @McCulloughFund: The most dangerous COVID-19 vaccines were from the original primary series administered in 2021. Schmeling et al: https…
RT @McCulloughFund: The most dangerous COVID-19 vaccines were from the original primary series administered in 2021. Schmeling et al: https…
RT @McCulloughFund: The most dangerous COVID-19 vaccines were from the original primary series administered in 2021. Schmeling et al: https…
RT @McCulloughFund: The most dangerous COVID-19 vaccines were from the original primary series administered in 2021. Schmeling et al: https…
RT @McCulloughFund: The most dangerous COVID-19 vaccines were from the original primary series administered in 2021. Schmeling et al: https…
RT @McCulloughFund: The most dangerous COVID-19 vaccines were from the original primary series administered in 2021. Schmeling et al: https…
RT @McCulloughFund: The most dangerous COVID-19 vaccines were from the original primary series administered in 2021. Schmeling et al: https…
RT @McCulloughFund: The most dangerous COVID-19 vaccines were from the original primary series administered in 2021. Schmeling et al: https…
RT @McCulloughFund: The most dangerous COVID-19 vaccines were from the original primary series administered in 2021. Schmeling et al: https…
RT @McCulloughFund: The most dangerous COVID-19 vaccines were from the original primary series administered in 2021. Schmeling et al: https…
RT @McCulloughFund: The most dangerous COVID-19 vaccines were from the original primary series administered in 2021. Schmeling et al: https…
RT @McCulloughFund: The most dangerous COVID-19 vaccines were from the original primary series administered in 2021. Schmeling et al: https…
RT @McCulloughFund: The most dangerous COVID-19 vaccines were from the original primary series administered in 2021. Schmeling et al: https…
RT @McCulloughFund: The most dangerous COVID-19 vaccines were from the original primary series administered in 2021. Schmeling et al: https…
RT @McCulloughFund: The most dangerous COVID-19 vaccines were from the original primary series administered in 2021. Schmeling et al: https…
RT @McCulloughFund: The most dangerous COVID-19 vaccines were from the original primary series administered in 2021. Schmeling et al: https…
RT @McCulloughFund: The most dangerous COVID-19 vaccines were from the original primary series administered in 2021. Schmeling et al: https…
RT @McCulloughFund: The most dangerous COVID-19 vaccines were from the original primary series administered in 2021. Schmeling et al: https…
RT @McCulloughFund: The most dangerous COVID-19 vaccines were from the original primary series administered in 2021. Schmeling et al: https…
RT @McCulloughFund: The most dangerous COVID-19 vaccines were from the original primary series administered in 2021. Schmeling et al: https…
RT @McCulloughFund: The most dangerous COVID-19 vaccines were from the original primary series administered in 2021. Schmeling et al: https…
RT @McCulloughFund: The most dangerous COVID-19 vaccines were from the original primary series administered in 2021. Schmeling et al: https…
RT @McCulloughFund: The most dangerous COVID-19 vaccines were from the original primary series administered in 2021. Schmeling et al: https…
RT @McCulloughFund: The most dangerous COVID-19 vaccines were from the original primary series administered in 2021. Schmeling et al: https…
RT @McCulloughFund: The most dangerous COVID-19 vaccines were from the original primary series administered in 2021. Schmeling et al: https…
RT @McCulloughFund: The most dangerous COVID-19 vaccines were from the original primary series administered in 2021. Schmeling et al: https…
RT @McCulloughFund: The most dangerous COVID-19 vaccines were from the original primary series administered in 2021. Schmeling et al: https…
RT @McCulloughFund: The most dangerous COVID-19 vaccines were from the original primary series administered in 2021. Schmeling et al: https…
RT @McCulloughFund: The most dangerous COVID-19 vaccines were from the original primary series administered in 2021. Schmeling et al: https…
RT @McCulloughFund: The most dangerous COVID-19 vaccines were from the original primary series administered in 2021. Schmeling et al: https…
RT @McCulloughFund: The most dangerous COVID-19 vaccines were from the original primary series administered in 2021. Schmeling et al: https…
RT @McCulloughFund: The most dangerous COVID-19 vaccines were from the original primary series administered in 2021. Schmeling et al: https…
RT @McCulloughFund: The most dangerous COVID-19 vaccines were from the original primary series administered in 2021. Schmeling et al: https…
RT @McCulloughFund: The most dangerous COVID-19 vaccines were from the original primary series administered in 2021. Schmeling et al: https…
RT @McCulloughFund: The most dangerous COVID-19 vaccines were from the original primary series administered in 2021. Schmeling et al: https…
The most dangerous COVID-19 vaccines were from the original primary series administered in 2021. Schmeling et al: https://t.co/KMl4KpC8gh Manniche et al: https://t.co/149Rw1rUDT @P_McCulloughMD on the Patriot Strong Podcast Watch the full episode: https://t.co/jpST4vl45S https://t.co/ge94slWUMZ
Invest. p. e13998 https://t.co/1SgyEQpPQR 2. Manniche, V. et al. (2024) Segnalazioni di sospetti eventi avversi dipendenti dal lotto del vaccino BNT162b2 mRNA COVID-19: confronto dei risultati da Danimarca e Svezia. Medicina DOI:10.3390/medicina60081343 https://t.co/2RfOPlc0LE
@StassenFrank @AndereKrant https://t.co/wMTktsF9mG Vibeke Manniche heeft onderzoek gedaan en gepubliceerd.
RT @tatiann69922625: (2/3) Ce qui indique qu'il ne s'agit pas d'incidents isolés mais d'une préoccupation importante Schmeling a cosigné 2…
RT @tatiann69922625: (2/3) Ce qui indique qu'il ne s'agit pas d'incidents isolés mais d'une préoccupation importante Schmeling a cosigné 2…
RT @tatiann69922625: (2/3) Ce qui indique qu'il ne s'agit pas d'incidents isolés mais d'une préoccupation importante Schmeling a cosigné 2…
RT @tatiann69922625: (2/3) Ce qui indique qu'il ne s'agit pas d'incidents isolés mais d'une préoccupation importante Schmeling a cosigné 2…
RT @tatiann69922625: (2/3) Ce qui indique qu'il ne s'agit pas d'incidents isolés mais d'une préoccupation importante Schmeling a cosigné 2…
RT @tatiann69922625: (2/3) Ce qui indique qu'il ne s'agit pas d'incidents isolés mais d'une préoccupation importante Schmeling a cosigné 2…
RT @tatiann69922625: (2/3) Ce qui indique qu'il ne s'agit pas d'incidents isolés mais d'une préoccupation importante Schmeling a cosigné 2…
RT @tatiann69922625: (2/3) Ce qui indique qu'il ne s'agit pas d'incidents isolés mais d'une préoccupation importante Schmeling a cosigné 2…
RT @tatiann69922625: (2/3) Ce qui indique qu'il ne s'agit pas d'incidents isolés mais d'une préoccupation importante Schmeling a cosigné 2…
(2/3) Ce qui indique qu'il ne s'agit pas d'incidents isolés mais d'une préoccupation importante Schmeling a cosigné 2 articles : 1. Schmeling, M. et al. (2023) Batch-dependent safety of the BNT162b2 mRNA COVID-19 vaccine. Eur. J. Clin. Invest. p. e13998 https://t.co/dWkSowTyOj
RT @Max___Schmeling: When we published our study https://t.co/utANVZtHXh showing that the Pfizer C-19 vaccine had three different adverse r…
RT @Max___Schmeling: When we published our study https://t.co/utANVZtHXh showing that the Pfizer C-19 vaccine had three different adverse r…
RT @Max___Schmeling: When we published our study https://t.co/utANVZtHXh showing that the Pfizer C-19 vaccine had three different adverse r…
RT @Max___Schmeling: When we published our study https://t.co/utANVZtHXh showing that the Pfizer C-19 vaccine had three different adverse r…
RT @Max___Schmeling: When we published our study https://t.co/utANVZtHXh showing that the Pfizer C-19 vaccine had three different adverse r…
RT @Max___Schmeling: When we published our study https://t.co/utANVZtHXh showing that the Pfizer C-19 vaccine had three different adverse r…
RT @Max___Schmeling: When we published our study https://t.co/utANVZtHXh showing that the Pfizer C-19 vaccine had three different adverse r…
RT @Max___Schmeling: When we published our study https://t.co/utANVZtHXh showing that the Pfizer C-19 vaccine had three different adverse r…
RT @Max___Schmeling: When we published our study https://t.co/utANVZtHXh showing that the Pfizer C-19 vaccine had three different adverse r…
@GiorgiaXu @Samhker @HolyBison @majuismail1122 @Tim_Walz 這些 mRNA 產品沒有 GMP， 注射了 "Hot batch" 的（藍色）， 大量不良反應。 綠色黃色的， 算是走運很多。 所以有些人第一針第二針就殘疾， 也有很多人及時停用，避開災難。 像 Biden 那樣打下去六針的， 畢竟少數。 https://t.co/Jp4b90BiXR https://t.co/FVD8EOChBM
RT @Max___Schmeling: When we published our study https://t.co/utANVZtHXh showing that the Pfizer C-19 vaccine had three different adverse r…
@BHudsonWrites @ABridgen @Hack4Labour Various papers and reports suggest that some batches produce more is adverse events than others. This one Danish medical authority data. https://t.co/sR6CQmLB0M
RT @Max___Schmeling: When we published our study https://t.co/utANVZtHXh showing that the Pfizer C-19 vaccine had three different adverse r…
RT @Max___Schmeling: When we published our study https://t.co/utANVZtHXh showing that the Pfizer C-19 vaccine had three different adverse r…
RT @Max___Schmeling: When we published our study https://t.co/utANVZtHXh showing that the Pfizer C-19 vaccine had three different adverse r…
RT @Max___Schmeling: When we published our study https://t.co/utANVZtHXh showing that the Pfizer C-19 vaccine had three different adverse r…
RT @Max___Schmeling: When we published our study https://t.co/utANVZtHXh showing that the Pfizer C-19 vaccine had three different adverse r…
RT @Max___Schmeling: When we published our study https://t.co/utANVZtHXh showing that the Pfizer C-19 vaccine had three different adverse r…
RT @Max___Schmeling: When we published our study https://t.co/utANVZtHXh showing that the Pfizer C-19 vaccine had three different adverse r…
RT @Max___Schmeling: When we published our study https://t.co/utANVZtHXh showing that the Pfizer C-19 vaccine had three different adverse r…
RT @Max___Schmeling: When we published our study https://t.co/utANVZtHXh showing that the Pfizer C-19 vaccine had three different adverse r…
RT @Max___Schmeling: When we published our study https://t.co/utANVZtHXh showing that the Pfizer C-19 vaccine had three different adverse r…
RT @Max___Schmeling: When we published our study https://t.co/utANVZtHXh showing that the Pfizer C-19 vaccine had three different adverse r…
RT @Max___Schmeling: When we published our study https://t.co/utANVZtHXh showing that the Pfizer C-19 vaccine had three different adverse r…
RT @Max___Schmeling: When we published our study https://t.co/utANVZtHXh showing that the Pfizer C-19 vaccine had three different adverse r…
RT @Max___Schmeling: When we published our study https://t.co/utANVZtHXh showing that the Pfizer C-19 vaccine had three different adverse r…
RT @Max___Schmeling: When we published our study https://t.co/utANVZtHXh showing that the Pfizer C-19 vaccine had three different adverse r…
RT @Max___Schmeling: When we published our study https://t.co/utANVZtHXh showing that the Pfizer C-19 vaccine had three different adverse r…
RT @Max___Schmeling: When we published our study https://t.co/utANVZtHXh showing that the Pfizer C-19 vaccine had three different adverse r…
RT @Max___Schmeling: When we published our study https://t.co/utANVZtHXh showing that the Pfizer C-19 vaccine had three different adverse r…
RT @Max___Schmeling: When we published our study https://t.co/utANVZtHXh showing that the Pfizer C-19 vaccine had three different adverse r…
RT @Max___Schmeling: When we published our study https://t.co/utANVZtHXh showing that the Pfizer C-19 vaccine had three different adverse r…
RT @Max___Schmeling: When we published our study https://t.co/utANVZtHXh showing that the Pfizer C-19 vaccine had three different adverse r…
RT @Max___Schmeling: When we published our study https://t.co/utANVZtHXh showing that the Pfizer C-19 vaccine had three different adverse r…
RT @Max___Schmeling: When we published our study https://t.co/utANVZtHXh showing that the Pfizer C-19 vaccine had three different adverse r…
When we published our study https://t.co/utANVZtHXh showing that the Pfizer C-19 vaccine had three different adverse reaction profiles, we were severely attacked, by SSI, Pfizer, and several Danish politicians. Now a Czech study: https://t.co/9Pf3Ygapp2 shows the same pattern.
@MrJNexusSTHLM @UnemployedVip @Truth_in_Number Variation in batch toxicity https://t.co/IrbXQtrp7I https://t.co/kn31jVvZxN https://t.co/RhA8wW7oP0
>> En Schmeling, Manniche, et al. (ref 48), die suggereren dat er met bepaalde batches van het Pfizer iets mis zou kunnen zijn. Is ook nogal dubieus, zie bv https://t.co/n8y3kYGifd >>
副反応報告が3本の線上に別れる傾向を指摘してとされる論文がある。 https://t.co/GQaGDLx186 しかし、重篤や死亡例には同様の分離傾向はないとしている。 また、報告バイアスの影響があり、他の交絡因子の検証もしていないので因果関係は不明とも明記されている。 これも、Weber https://t.co/PEQaweVFfh
@MaikKraus6719 Sofern Sie nicht zutiefst verlogen heucheln würden, stünde es Ihnen ja frei, sich weiter mit jenen Chargen spiken zu lassen, die sich als besonders gefährlich erwiesen haben. Ansonsten ist Ihr Dreck Ausdruck von #Menschenverachtung & #Opferverhöhnung! https://t.co/toJvrAbGJ0 https://t.co/njFg7hevz1
@FiscalSuspicion @HopiNg66966500 I am not on Twitter to garner followers, I just jump on when I have a little free time here and there. Batch Number LOL. Are you referring to this nonsense https://t.co/bYiN98kxln
@StephanRathel @SuckMyD80016006 @schizoswoche @BerndGummauer https://t.co/Yu155XLHvO
@CrippsNicky @CaulfieldTim https://t.co/bYiN98kxln
@AjanmiesMieti @MediaKanto Rokote-erien eroja ja haitallisuutta tarkasteltu tässä tutkimuspaperissa: Schmeling, M., Manniche, V., & Hansen, P. R. (2023). Batch-dependent safety of the BNT162b2 mRNA COVID-19 vaccine. European Journal of Clinical Investigation, 53(8), e13998. https://t.co/aU3YjT5agd
@PhilthyCarn @TxRngr59 @uTobian That claim is based on the paper published a year ago, which analysed adverse effects in Denmark, December 2021-January 2022. https://t.co/gyce0BLf2d
RT @mauricevachon12: @P_McCulloughMD @VigilantFox @VigilantNews @DrNoMask @Jo_Bond @MdBreathe @drcraigwax @joerogan @JRE_Clips @TuckerCarls…
@Lindhacker @P_McCulloughMD @VigilantFox @VigilantNews @DrNoMask @Jo_Bond @MdBreathe @drcraigwax @joerogan @JRE_Clips @TuckerCarlson https://t.co/JKTIWmle42 Max Schmelling kan følges her. https://t.co/J7zvWuf9OZ
@P_McCulloughMD @VigilantFox @VigilantNews @DrNoMask @Jo_Bond @MdBreathe @drcraigwax @joerogan @JRE_Clips @TuckerCarlson Question for Dr. McCullough about the Schmeling paper on vaccine batches: Hyper-concentrated spike proteins in some batches is a correctable problem. Why do we need to ban mRNA vaccines? Can't we just manufacture them properly? https://t.co/WYe1rwXbom
RT @GotthardTomas: @johbagleborn @YRonnholm26942 @gleppa WHO, FN och EU kontrolleras av "globalisterna" och försöker tillskansa sig makt ge…
RT @GotthardTomas: @johbagleborn @YRonnholm26942 @gleppa WHO, FN och EU kontrolleras av "globalisterna" och försöker tillskansa sig makt ge…
@johbagleborn @YRonnholm26942 @gleppa WHO, FN och EU kontrolleras av "globalisterna" och försöker tillskansa sig makt genom ett nytt pandemiavtal. Data som jag baserar mina slutsatser på är att batcherna har olika giftighetsgrad [1] utan att myndighet eller main stream media varnar för det [1] https://t.co/IrbXQtqRia
@s3tiii1 @snicklink Ich glaub er meint die Studie hier https://t.co/fdjBPvxMpY https://t.co/PYGGVmoxga
@LMSTdk @RoHa4800 “Øget mulighed for at opdage meget sjældne bivirkninger?” Hvad med at tage øjenbindene af og se jer omkring! Se på antallet af indberetninger! Se på det danske peer-reviewed studie, der viser et alvorligt batchafhængigt sikkerhedssignal! Stop
@FringeViews Here's the link to the Danish study: https://t.co/PONoO98TbK
@VigilantFox @MakisMD Um, yeah that 1 in 35 thing is nonsense https://t.co/bYiN98kxln
@MartinScott1969 @yay_its_james https://t.co/LySnWPqb68
@4d_5627324 @gtuckerkellogg @Johnincarlisle @YouTube https://t.co/bYiN98kxln
@LikkyJeaks @GetSchwifyinere @Debunk_the_Funk Lol Do you mean that little letter to the BJM editor that Josh from Isreal sent in which he refrences this nonsense study. https://t.co/bYiN98kxln
RT @MattJam28: This is a particularly good one https://t.co/X1PgFZ2lii
This is a particularly good one https://t.co/X1PgFZ2lii
@robinmonotti About that Danish study https://t.co/bYiN98l5aV
@Christi36980660 @VivinuAgency passt scho. Den Boosta ned vergessen
@KeiDeia とっくの昔に看破されているフェイクと書いたのに、それを改めて紹介されてもねぇ。 原典にない空想を並べただけのwebページを紹介されてもだから何?としか言えません。 https://t.co/GQaGDLx186 一介の看護師が隠された秘密を知ってるとか 人間に換算すると千倍相当の大量投与をした動物実験とか
@VSuomk @JarmoLius @merjah Siitä ensi hätään: https://t.co/cdYO62KnQn https://t.co/QqOSbuzkMA https://t.co/4GjFty2ZJW https://t.co/nCQj4XKLwG https://t.co/Oei8rRYQdA https://t.co/7uEseaY8lc
@UltimateLegendd @Glenn02660664 @KeithOlbermann @RenzTom no he’s not. https://t.co/tPARwjyPxI https://t.co/xBMNFODQOl https://t.co/ia6YUOgPG3 https://t.co/Bef5FLF6iD https://t.co/xmjbnkvL0I liar and fraud
@SadSchwab66 @GunnaBeBiblical @paulwar83043688 @stkirsch Pretty sure she explained it all right here https://t.co/alDnxvjMVj Please in detail explain what she got wrong?
@GunnaBeBiblical @paulwar83043688 @stkirsch More on batches https://t.co/bYiN98kxln
@Ctglobalde @tylerblack32 About batches https://t.co/bYiN98kxln
@William38841767 @ClareCraigPath https://t.co/bYiN98kxln
@Witercpourri2 @dr_jon_l @stkirsch Depending on the pool LOL https://t.co/bYiN98kxln
@RobinhoodRev @stkirsch Batch this https://t.co/bYiN98kxln
@KimDotcom Schmeling, https://t.co/712sj2seEa. have already proven beyond reasonable doubt of intent to harm: https://t.co/gd6ikxU8gh The problem is that the people who run the gallows are co-conspirators. Read about CIA program MK-NAOMI sometime. They want us dead. https://t.co/WYS1wiG655
https://t.co/ibTivaSrEv Batch-dependent safety of the BNT162b2 mRNA COVID-19 vaccine
@BanounHelene @StatChrisCotton @HAS_sante @ansm @Sante_Gouv Vibeke Manniche n'est pas scientifique de l'EMA. Bonne soirée. └[ ∵ ]┘Retrouvé le papier. https://t.co/viDLZlgKrd
@michellespj @drob256 Reality https://t.co/bYiN98l5aV
@RedPilledVishal @_aussie17 @MJRLdeGraaff @Joachim_Kuhs https://t.co/exmxDn7KUz https://t.co/rN9MTGTOgH
RT @GotthardTomas: @roller2426 There are at least three different toxicity levels of Covid injections. The linear regression indicate it is…
RT @GotthardTomas: @roller2426 There are at least three different toxicity levels of Covid injections. The linear regression indicate it is…
@roller2426 There are at least three different toxicity levels of Covid injections. The linear regression indicate it is by design and not random poor manufacturing practice. Batch-dependent safety of the BNT162b2 mRNA COVID-19 vaccine. https://t.co/IrbXQtrp7I https://t.co/zOMoGVl3Wc
RT @rosinafasching: @123lovespeace @RealWsiegrist Lt. der Chargen-Studie der Univ. Kopenhagen waren nur 30% ungefährlich - vermutl. Placebo…
@123lovespeace @RealWsiegrist Lt. der Chargen-Studie der Univ. Kopenhagen waren nur 30% ungefährlich - vermutl. Placebos. https://t.co/6ErkO3KM3a
RT @GotthardTomas: @BezmenovTom @DrEmmaFrans Här har du några studier med data PlasmidGate https://t.co/dkUfd4yLL9… COVID-19 Vaccination…
@BezmenovTom @DrEmmaFrans Här har du några studier med data PlasmidGate https://t.co/dkUfd4yLL9… COVID-19 Vaccination Effectiveness https://t.co/fI83wDDn4B… Batch-dependent safety of the BNT162b2... https://t.co/IrbXQtqRia What is in the so-called COVID-19 Vaccines? https://t.co/s0LTsm3WHo https://t.co/V5xnzZNjPj
@_wildbill_o @stkirsch Ooooooo! (You could have actually read the letter to the editor you know)
@_wildbill_o @stkirsch If you had critical thinking skills you would have known that he was referring to a letter to the editor...and then read it and noted the authors conclusions. Being the sheep you are you wouldn't. https://t.co/xT7j1Bwaqd
Igor van Kaam: Waar blijven de excuses aan de wappies? "Igor, ik ben misschien een beetje hard tegen je geweest." https://t.co/2w0WsWaoX8
@twittonreg @tenebra99 Nonsense sorry. https://t.co/cBuK787Lo4
@MrJNexusSTHLM @thereal_truther https://t.co/bYiN98kxln
@OctoberLuPerez @iluminatibot It depends what batches you got. Take a look what the University of Kopenhagen discovered: https://t.co/6ErkO3KM3a
@HansChr52239198 @VirusesImmunity @statesdj @MaggieLind2 @MHitchingsEpi @datcummings The Danish study didn't actually show that. The authors didn't understand the data they were analysing. https://t.co/8sDeg0I6L7
@Mister___Q @PierreKory https://t.co/bYiN98kxln
@RefugeOfSinner5 @Bertrambotron @SwaledaleMutton https://t.co/bYiN98kxln
@_Pflegelehrer_ @dieseeinebirgit @FlorianDreaming Extra für dich die peer-reviewed-Originalstudie, schönes Wochenende! https://t.co/6ErkO3KM3a
@MannicheVibeke By now you ahould know that your study is garbage https://t.co/LQ1jEEj6Si
@throeng @gerhard_zeiler Ob diese Covid-19-"Impfungen" Gifte sind oder nicht, dazu mal das hier anhören? https://t.co/2itxRVL78m oder dän. Studie selbst lesen: https://t.co/6ErkO3KM3a
@paulbee82849197 @DrLoupis Sorry. https://t.co/6ErkO3KM3a
https://t.co/kkicsQRPW8
@MannicheVibeke https://t.co/LQ1jEEj6Si
@MannicheVibeke https://t.co/LQ1jEEj6Si
@EBodderas @welt Nein https://t.co/LQ1jEEj6Si
@AndreasShrugged @Lars_Kruse_1973 https://t.co/LQ1jEEj6Si
@NicoDekker15 @SteigstraHerman @ministerVWS Als je een goede analyse wilt zien van het Deens onderzoek, kan ik je deze adviseren. Zij is een goede en betrouwbare bron voor je Covid-19 informatie. https://t.co/am6gBcv9sD
@GerBNL @ArtsenC https://t.co/5dthmwctn0
>> Oa goed uitgelegd door @DrSusanOliver1 die er een video over maakte omdat een andere populaire desinformant, John Campbell, er ook mee kwam: https://t.co/gCdvF4gqBE
@PrydePoet @VPrasadMDMPH https://t.co/bYiN98kxln
RT @satoxsoda: @wcpatriot0911 @DiedSuddenly_ There does seem to be some truth to it We now know pfizer employees in Australia was given dif…
@amappou @BGatesIsaPyscho @LBC @NickFerrariLBC Here are a few of examples of his grift: https://t.co/6U3D1FD6ZI https://t.co/amH3YmjaxL https://t.co/DbBRYAPqjY https://t.co/6BdZxzcZNZ https://t.co/qTQ8J9ofhG https://t.co/zswxkoC7yQ https://t.co/25SIT25Pir https://t.co/Wvx3zsDz4W
@wcpatriot0911 @DiedSuddenly_ There does seem to be some truth to it We now know pfizer employees in Australia was given different batches We now know the vaccines were DNA contaminated with carcinogenic SV40 promoters. We now know 32.09% was the safe batch from Netherland study https://t.co/CZVp5IZNeG
#Bruls #covid #oversterfte #Omtzigt Waar blijven de excuses aan de wappies? "Igor, ik ben misschien een beet... https://t.co/t4OrPiEaJR via @YouTube
@HSmith24993512 @IguapeChris @liz_churchill10 https://t.co/stnn7K1l9r
@KDC66091996 @DrSusanOliver1 https://t.co/bYiN98kxln
@tonylinfreedom @BreezerGalway @shmuelcshapira https://t.co/2cWPMep3Jt
@SamiAntinniemi @HelkaMirjami Eiköhän tämänkin Cambellin videon misinformaatio ammuta alas lähipäivinä. Sillä aikaa Sami voisi perehtyä vaikka Susan Oliverin edelliseen tykitykseen. https://t.co/B81KmPGxCF
@FayeLaJones @USA_Goose90 Your gunna love this lady shes a real life scientist and you can find her “papers” on google scholar. https://t.co/2YuXPmUrus listen to her.
RT @DrSusanOliver1: The batch adverse event claims in the “Danish Paper” were bad enough, but Dr John Campbell has added a new level of rid…
@sasswashere https://t.co/A9qzOuadYF
'Batch-dependent safety of the BNT162b2 mRNA COVID-19 vaccine' European Journal of Clinical Investigation 30.3.2023 https://t.co/eWBrzj0lwE 'Impfskandal am Fließband' Dr. Kay Klapproth für Achgut 14.7.2023 https://t.co/FBopEpyefo #covid #covid19 #vaccine #anomaly
Who should One trust more ? This one? https://t.co/ZX3QykGDQ7 or this? ⬇️ https://t.co/OGP1kSTB7O
@sashekin_ @n4hpg @Johnincarlisle @YouTube https://t.co/BAoUkjJIeg
RT @JonathanSarfat1: Dr John Campbell’s VIRAL vaccine paper BOLLOCKS (The Danish paper) https://t.co/hydKIwk7qM via @YouTube
Dr John Campbell’s VIRAL vaccine paper BOLLOCKS (The Danish paper) https://t.co/hydKIwk7qM via @YouTube
@willPS21 Nurse Campbell is pretty funny. Susan Oliver has a lot of fun with him. https://t.co/mPy4BO42Vd
RT @PaeisTokyo: @YouTube Batch-dependent safety of the BNT162b2 mRNA COVID-19 vaccine Max Schmeling, Vibeke Manniche, Peter Riis Hansen Fi…
She makes good points. I thought myself the first batches were given to the most frail people. https://t.co/hb9FcDQc1D
Here's YouTuber John Campbell getting shredded AGAIN for his nonsense. https://t.co/7wiyLN2W6q @jimmy_dore , being the coward he is, will only ever have numpties, contrarians and dumb fucks appearing on his show now.
@Retired30S @AlastairMcA30 @Johnincarlisle @YouTube One recent example by Dr. Susan Oliver: https://t.co/8ZlZs7tOdS
@shlomosapiens Das ist der übliche Wahnwichtel-Quatschi. Erfreulicherweise ist da nichts dran. https://t.co/6BvjZo9PJ4
RT @ENirenberg: Another gem from @DrSusanOliver1 Dr John Campbell’s VIRAL vaccine paper BOLLOCKS (The Danish paper) https://t.co/ahA5bOg…
RT @thebadstats: Another for the "John Campbell is undeniably intentionally lying" files https://t.co/8zoeCPcEUw
@Quo_vadis_BRD @AlexanderKekule @punktpreradovic Da ist erfreulicherweise nichts dran: https://t.co/LQ1jEEj6Si
@_aussie17 @Johnincarlisle Nurse John is the most debunked anti vaccine muppet ever https://t.co/CxkGCKAy83
@ABridgen Maybe some reliable evidence which isn't based on fake science. Oh, and from a person who hasn't decided to contradict himself to make $ https://t.co/CxkGCKAy83
@Retired30S @AlastairMcA30 @Johnincarlisle @YouTube https://t.co/wicEUeyH58
@Retired30S @Johnincarlisle @YouTube I welcome your apology. Also: https://t.co/crcr3LEiD3 and so many others. You’re most welcome! https://t.co/9nXkERsCyJ
RT @DrSusanOliver1: The batch adverse event claims in the “Danish Paper” were bad enough, but Dr John Campbell has added a new level of rid…
Igor (University of Me) de laatste info over corona. Waar staan we nu? Waar blijven de excuses aan de "wappies"? Remember, Remember.... https://t.co/1Wi7TE0fp2
@HilloneT1 @ABridgen @Johnincarlisle Funny how what he says now completely contradicts what he said before he decided to be an anti vaxxer. https://t.co/CxkGCKAy83
https://t.co/0cYyooblRS
@CKellyUAP That study and discussion is bollocks. :) https://t.co/V4tsVG6LK2
@YouTube Batch-dependent safety of the BNT162b2 mRNA COVID-19 vaccine Max Schmeling, Vibeke Manniche, Peter Riis Hansen First published: 30 March 2023 https://t.co/Q5Bs5k0dy7 https://t.co/qSHm3xwt5E
RT @DrSusanOliver1: The batch adverse event claims in the “Danish Paper” were bad enough, but Dr John Campbell has added a new level of rid…
RT @DrSusanOliver1: The batch adverse event claims in the “Danish Paper” were bad enough, but Dr John Campbell has added a new level of rid…
RT @DrSusanOliver1: The batch adverse event claims in the “Danish Paper” were bad enough, but Dr John Campbell has added a new level of rid…
@Johnincarlisle @YouTube https://t.co/bYiN98kxln
RT @DrSusanOliver1: The batch adverse event claims in the “Danish Paper” were bad enough, but Dr John Campbell has added a new level of rid…
RT @DrSusanOliver1: The batch adverse event claims in the “Danish Paper” were bad enough, but Dr John Campbell has added a new level of rid…
RT @ENirenberg: Another gem from @DrSusanOliver1 Dr John Campbell’s VIRAL vaccine paper BOLLOCKS (The Danish paper) https://t.co/ahA5bOg…
RT @ENirenberg: Another gem from @DrSusanOliver1 Dr John Campbell’s VIRAL vaccine paper BOLLOCKS (The Danish paper) https://t.co/ahA5bOg…
RT @ENirenberg: Another gem from @DrSusanOliver1 Dr John Campbell’s VIRAL vaccine paper BOLLOCKS (The Danish paper) https://t.co/ahA5bOg…
RT @DrSusanOliver1: The batch adverse event claims in the “Danish Paper” were bad enough, but Dr John Campbell has added a new level of rid…
RT @DrSusanOliver1: The batch adverse event claims in the “Danish Paper” were bad enough, but Dr John Campbell has added a new level of rid…
RT @ENirenberg: Another gem from @DrSusanOliver1 Dr John Campbell’s VIRAL vaccine paper BOLLOCKS (The Danish paper) https://t.co/ahA5bOg…
Dr John Campbell’s VIRAL vaccine paper BOLLOCKS (The Danish paper) https://t.co/r9j4ht9vBd via @YouTube
@Travis_in_Flint But but but, smiling science woman says 'all good' so I must trust her :) :) :) :) :) https://t.co/M5tfK4WfXH Gimme all the jabs! Gimme, gimme gimme gimme! Looks like so much fun! ...................................................................
RT @DrSusanOliver1: The batch adverse event claims in the “Danish Paper” were bad enough, but Dr John Campbell has added a new level of rid…
RT @thebadstats: Another for the "John Campbell is undeniably intentionally lying" files https://t.co/8zoeCPcEUw
RT @thebadstats: Another for the "John Campbell is undeniably intentionally lying" files https://t.co/8zoeCPcEUw
RT @DrSusanOliver1: The batch adverse event claims in the “Danish Paper” were bad enough, but Dr John Campbell has added a new level of rid…
RT @DrSusanOliver1: The batch adverse event claims in the “Danish Paper” were bad enough, but Dr John Campbell has added a new level of rid…
RT @DrSusanOliver1: The batch adverse event claims in the “Danish Paper” were bad enough, but Dr John Campbell has added a new level of rid…
RT @thebadstats: Another for the "John Campbell is undeniably intentionally lying" files https://t.co/8zoeCPcEUw
RT @DrSusanOliver1: The batch adverse event claims in the “Danish Paper” were bad enough, but Dr John Campbell has added a new level of rid…
RT @thebadstats: Another for the "John Campbell is undeniably intentionally lying" files https://t.co/8zoeCPcEUw
RT @thebadstats: Another for the "John Campbell is undeniably intentionally lying" files https://t.co/8zoeCPcEUw
RT @DrSusanOliver1: The batch adverse event claims in the “Danish Paper” were bad enough, but Dr John Campbell has added a new level of rid…
@CKellyUAP Sorry this is totally discredited bolllocks.. https://t.co/y8eI9JX47F
More Bollocks spread by CK and Nurse JC https://t.co/y8eI9JX47F https://t.co/GJXch5J0iN
RT @DrSusanOliver1: The batch adverse event claims in the “Danish Paper” were bad enough, but Dr John Campbell has added a new level of rid…
RT @DrSusanOliver1: The batch adverse event claims in the “Danish Paper” were bad enough, but Dr John Campbell has added a new level of rid…
RT @Chewbacca36: https://t.co/RVP4vJeC7a https://t.co/SKakwrmMKn
https://t.co/RVP4vJeC7a https://t.co/SKakwrmMKn
Waar blijven de excuses aan de wappies? "Igor, ik ben misschien een beet... https://t.co/1QmXPqlGeV via @YouTube
@FreshEquinox @Truth_in_Number @PhilipRafferty5 @DowdEdward Can't say I trust governments/scientists/ doctors/ not media outlets, but if you believe the numbers: by 11 Nov 2022, 701 million doses of the BNT162b2 mRNA vaccine (Pfizer-BioNTech) had been administered and linked with 971,021 reports of (SAEs) in EU https://t.co/vGGosKfC4V
@Truth_in_Number @PhilipRafferty5 @DowdEdward by 11 November 2022, 701 million doses of the BNT162b2 mRNA vaccine (Pfizer-BioNTech) had been administered and linked with 971,021 reports of suspected adverse effects (SAEs) in the European Union/European Economic Area https://t.co/vGGosKfC4V
@TravIsScience @ButHisEmails @jhan2qt @FreshEquinox @Truth_in_Number by 11 November 2022, 701 million doses of the BNT162b2 mRNA vaccine (Pfizer-BioNTech) had been administered and linked with 971,021 reports of suspected adverse effects (SAEs) in the European Union/European Economic Area. .https://t.co/vGGosKfC4V
Waar blijven de excuses aan de wappies? "Igor, ik ben misschien een beet... https://t.co/iFEuI8NrKw via @YouTube
Schmeling's paper shows very alarming rates of suspected adverse events & deaths from the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine (blue batches⬇️) So it's very unfortunate that the paper is badly-written, with inconsistencies in numbers Was it properly peer-reviewed? https://t.co/FM48kETXXo https://t.co/1hJT5gQQTQ
Waar blijven de excuses aan de wappies? "Igor, ik ben misschien een beet... https://t.co/9R6eglKYOI via @YouTube
Uitstekende samenvatting over de Corona beloftes enzo... https://t.co/Qvfsh3Ddqd
Waar blijven de excuses aan de wappies? "Igor, ik ben misschien een beet... https://t.co/79pmyvtZdy via @YouTube
Waar blijven de excuses aan de wappies? "Igor, ik ben misschien een beet... https://t.co/ditd3xONyo via @YouTube
Waar blijven de excuses aan de wappies? https://t.co/6aQQzdbm8S via @YouTube
(1/2) デンマークでのロット毎の副反応報告頻度を分析した論文。 https://t.co/GQaGDLwtiy 反ワクチンは危険なロットの証拠だと騒ぐが、そんなことは一言も書いてない。 副反応報告は3本の線上に別れる傾向があったが、 重篤や死亡例報告はバラツキが大きくて同様の分離傾向はないとのこと。 https://t.co/NxsWgLyDWs
RT @K9FCR: https://t.co/FeQkhVR7YX
https://t.co/FeQkhVR7YX
@plej_a @Gaby06870254 Welche andere Schlussfolgerung wäre sonst denkbar? Okay, dass die hochempfindliche mRNA transportgeschädigt als "truncated" benannt wurde. Hier die Studie aus Kopenhagen: https://t.co/6ErkO3KM3a
Study: Batch-dependent safety of the BNT162b2 mRNA COVID-19 vaccine. "Danish study showing enormous variation in the adverse events associated with different batches of the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine, or BNT162b2 per its scientific codename." https://t.co/VD1WGiyNfm https://t.co/CFSYJu95ow
@Maggs18194477 @AussieVal10 The paper: https://t.co/gyce0BLf2d
@EchtJetzt_soso @st_hennermann @Zero_Long_Covid @BioNTech_Group @pfizer Wenn man nach einer Quelle fragt und jemand mit 'Reitschuster' ankommt ... Ich denke, gemeint ist: https://t.co/btGJSufKjr
@HamelinMd Est celle ci: https://t.co/kp7bCD04Af
RT @shmuelcshapira: Non consistrnt batches, safety issues Batch-dependent safety of the BNT162b2 mRNA COVID-19 vaccine M Schmeling V Manni…
RT @shmuelcshapira: Non consistrnt batches, safety issues Batch-dependent safety of the BNT162b2 mRNA COVID-19 vaccine M Schmeling V Manni…
RT @shmuelcshapira: Non consistrnt batches, safety issues Batch-dependent safety of the BNT162b2 mRNA COVID-19 vaccine M Schmeling V Manni…
RT @shmuelcshapira: Non consistrnt batches, safety issues Batch-dependent safety of the BNT162b2 mRNA COVID-19 vaccine M Schmeling V Manni…
RT @shmuelcshapira: Non consistrnt batches, safety issues Batch-dependent safety of the BNT162b2 mRNA COVID-19 vaccine M Schmeling V Manni…
RT @shmuelcshapira: Non consistrnt batches, safety issues Batch-dependent safety of the BNT162b2 mRNA COVID-19 vaccine M Schmeling V Manni…
RT @shmuelcshapira: Non consistrnt batches, safety issues Batch-dependent safety of the BNT162b2 mRNA COVID-19 vaccine M Schmeling V Manni…
RT @shmuelcshapira: Non consistrnt batches, safety issues Batch-dependent safety of the BNT162b2 mRNA COVID-19 vaccine M Schmeling V Manni…
RT @shmuelcshapira: Non consistrnt batches, safety issues Batch-dependent safety of the BNT162b2 mRNA COVID-19 vaccine M Schmeling V Manni…
RT @shmuelcshapira: Non consistrnt batches, safety issues Batch-dependent safety of the BNT162b2 mRNA COVID-19 vaccine M Schmeling V Manni…
RT @shmuelcshapira: Non consistrnt batches, safety issues Batch-dependent safety of the BNT162b2 mRNA COVID-19 vaccine M Schmeling V Manni…
RT @shmuelcshapira: Non consistrnt batches, safety issues Batch-dependent safety of the BNT162b2 mRNA COVID-19 vaccine M Schmeling V Manni…
RT @shmuelcshapira: Non consistrnt batches, safety issues Batch-dependent safety of the BNT162b2 mRNA COVID-19 vaccine M Schmeling V Manni…
RT @shmuelcshapira: Non consistrnt batches, safety issues Batch-dependent safety of the BNT162b2 mRNA COVID-19 vaccine M Schmeling V Manni…