Approx. 1 in 3 MRI ordered for the spine are deemed inappropriate. This is a significant problem considering the prevalence of low back pain & spinal pain in in the general population. https://t.co/wNTyLttYWT https://t.co/baSdKv43kk
Measuring appropriateness of diagnostic imaging: a scoping review.
Mentions
Extended reach
Total likes
Video views
Mentions per month
May 2023 – Nov 2023Where it's discussed
-
X / Twitter27 posts
-
YouTube1 videos
AI synopsis
What people are saying
The discussions frequently mention the prevalence of inappropriate imaging, such as '1 in 3 MRI ordered for the spine are deemed inappropriate,' demonstrating concern over current practices. The tone varies from critical to hopeful, emphasizing the urgent need for better standardization and further research, which underscores the perceived importance of the review’s findings.
Most discussions acknowledge the need for improved standards in diagnostic imaging, supporting the review's findings about inconsistent methods.
Posts demonstrate high interest by highlighting specific issues like inappropriate MRI usage and emphasizing the importance of advancing research.
Comments engage by referencing specific statistics and calling for further research, indicating a moderate level of active discussion.
The discussions reflect awareness of the article’s significance, especially in reducing unnecessary imaging and improving clinical care, though impact is partly aspirational.
Abstract in brief
- This scoping review analyzed 50 studies on how appropriateness of diagnostic imaging is defined and measured, highlighting that there is no standardized method currently used across research.
- The studies mainly used guidelines like national recommendations and the American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria, but many lacked detailed methodological descriptions, leading to inconsistent appropriateness rates.
- The review found that most research focused on modalities like computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging, with a significant need for more multicenter, indication-specific studies, especially in pediatric and outpatient settings, to improve the assessment of imaging appropriateness.]
Top posts
Most liked on X and Bluesky#CriticalReview: Need of advanced research concerning appropriateness and quality of indication of #clinical care in #diagnostic #imaging. (Felix Walther et al.) Read the article here
Critical Review: Need of advanced research concerning appropriateness of #clinical care, particularly of #diagnostic #imaging. (Felix Walther et al.) #InsightsIntoImaging The full review can be found in the link below
Measuring appropriateness of diagnostic imaging: a scoping review https://t.co/N2C6UKbljl via @Medizin_TUD researchers @RogueRad https://t.co/oIaDvhxxtb
Measuring appropriateness of diagnostic imaging: a scoping review https://t.co/yXF1qaChcF https://t.co/1krGgWSlrS
RT @DerekGriffin86: Approx. 1 in 3 MRI ordered for the spine are deemed inappropriate. This is a significant problem considering the preval…
All mentions
Evaluating Diagnostic Imaging Appropriateness: A Comprehensive Review
This scoping review analyzed 50 studies on how the appropriateness of diagnostic imaging is defined and measured, highlighting the lack of standardized methods and the reliance on guidelines like national and American…
RT @DerekGriffin86: Approx. 1 in 3 MRI ordered for the spine are deemed inappropriate. This is a significant problem considering the preval…
RT @DerekGriffin86: Approx. 1 in 3 MRI ordered for the spine are deemed inappropriate. This is a significant problem considering the preval…
RT @DerekGriffin86: Approx. 1 in 3 MRI ordered for the spine are deemed inappropriate. This is a significant problem considering the preval…
RT @DerekGriffin86: Approx. 1 in 3 MRI ordered for the spine are deemed inappropriate. This is a significant problem considering the preval…
RT @DerekGriffin86: Approx. 1 in 3 MRI ordered for the spine are deemed inappropriate. This is a significant problem considering the preval…
RT @DerekGriffin86: Approx. 1 in 3 MRI ordered for the spine are deemed inappropriate. This is a significant problem considering the preval…
RT @DerekGriffin86: Approx. 1 in 3 MRI ordered for the spine are deemed inappropriate. This is a significant problem considering the preval…
RT @DerekGriffin86: Approx. 1 in 3 MRI ordered for the spine are deemed inappropriate. This is a significant problem considering the preval…
Measuring appropriateness of diagnostic imaging: a scoping review https://t.co/N2C6UKbljl via @Medizin_TUD researchers @RogueRad https://t.co/oIaDvhxxtb
RT @DerekGriffin86: Approx. 1 in 3 MRI ordered for the spine are deemed inappropriate. This is a significant problem considering the preval…
RT @DerekGriffin86: Approx. 1 in 3 MRI ordered for the spine are deemed inappropriate. This is a significant problem considering the preval…
Measuring appropriateness of diagnostic imaging: a scoping review https://t.co/yXF1qaChcF https://t.co/1krGgWSlrS
RT @DerekGriffin86: Approx. 1 in 3 MRI ordered for the spine are deemed inappropriate. This is a significant problem considering the preval…
RT @DerekGriffin86: Approx. 1 in 3 MRI ordered for the spine are deemed inappropriate. This is a significant problem considering the preval…
RT @DerekGriffin86: Approx. 1 in 3 MRI ordered for the spine are deemed inappropriate. This is a significant problem considering the preval…
RT @DerekGriffin86: Approx. 1 in 3 MRI ordered for the spine are deemed inappropriate. This is a significant problem considering the preval…
RT @DerekGriffin86: Approx. 1 in 3 MRI ordered for the spine are deemed inappropriate. This is a significant problem considering the preval…
RT @DerekGriffin86: Approx. 1 in 3 MRI ordered for the spine are deemed inappropriate. This is a significant problem considering the preval…
RT @DerekGriffin86: Approx. 1 in 3 MRI ordered for the spine are deemed inappropriate. This is a significant problem considering the preval…
RT @DerekGriffin86: Approx. 1 in 3 MRI ordered for the spine are deemed inappropriate. This is a significant problem considering the preval…
RT @DerekGriffin86: Approx. 1 in 3 MRI ordered for the spine are deemed inappropriate. This is a significant problem considering the preval…
RT @DerekGriffin86: Approx. 1 in 3 MRI ordered for the spine are deemed inappropriate. This is a significant problem considering the preval…
Approx. 1 in 3 MRI ordered for the spine are deemed inappropriate. This is a significant problem considering the prevalence of low back pain & spinal pain in in the general population. https://t.co/wNTyLttYWT https://t.co/baSdKv43kk
‼️Check out this critical review about radiological appropriateness. There is still a long way to go. ➡️ https://t.co/ZJZwKM9jSZ
RT @InsightsImaging: Critical Review: Need of advanced research concerning appropriateness of #clinical care, particularly of #diagnostic #…
Critical Review: Need of advanced research concerning appropriateness of #clinical care, particularly of #diagnostic #imaging. (Felix Walther et al.) #InsightsIntoImaging The full review can be found in the link below
#CriticalReview: Need of advanced research concerning appropriateness and quality of indication of #clinical care in #diagnostic #imaging. (Felix Walther et al.) Read the article here
DG
ER
II
AP
ɹP
CL
CF
JP
I
VP
KG
CC
HH
TP
JK
E
RE
PM
JB
ST
CB
RF
AM
RG
CD
SB
RC