Synopsis of Social media discussions

Several posts discuss how the article critically assesses the difficulties in evaluating imputation methods due to factors like data variability and distributional shifts, using words like 'challenges' and 'highlights' to emphasize the study’s significance. The tone balances respect for the thoroughness of the research with recognition of the complex issues in the field, showing both admiration and a desire to understand these advancements deeply.

A
Agreement
Moderate agreement

Most discussions acknowledge the importance and relevance of the study, with some posts expressing support for its detailed evaluation of imputation methods.

I
Interest
High level of interest

Posts demonstrate high curiosity, especially with mentions of the publication's years-long effort and the challenges in data evaluation, indicating active engagement.

E
Engagement
Moderate level of engagement

There is some deep engagement, reflected in comments about methodological challenges, data processing mistakes, and appreciation for the comprehensive analysis.

I
Impact
Moderate level of impact

While the discussions highlight the significance of understanding imputation methods, there is a moderate perception of immediate high impact, mostly emphasizing ongoing research and future improvements.

Social Mentions

YouTube

1 Videos

Twitter

42 Posts

Metrics

Video Views

20

Total Likes

141

Extended Reach

487,782

Social Features

43

Timeline: Posts about article

Top Social Media Posts

Posts referencing the article

Assessing Cross-Cell Type Imputation Methods in Genomics Studies

Assessing Cross-Cell Type Imputation Methods in Genomics Studies

This video reviews 23 methods from the ENCODE Imputation Challenge, exploring the challenges in evaluating imputation performance and highlighting future research directions to enhance genomics data analysis.

July 31, 2023

20 views


  • Arthur Liberzon
    @arthlib (Twitter)

    RT @jmschreiber91: @tangming2005 Making those mistakes or describing them? I've written a few describing them. Mistakes in performing ML g…
    view full post

    August 13, 2023

    5

  • @dmcg@genomic.social
    @David_McGaughey (Twitter)

    RT @jmschreiber91: @tangming2005 Making those mistakes or describing them? I've written a few describing them. Mistakes in performing ML g…
    view full post

    August 13, 2023

    5

  • Sichu Lu(Sichu.Lu218@proton.me)
    @lu_sichu (Twitter)

    RT @jmschreiber91: @tangming2005 Making those mistakes or describing them? I've written a few describing them. Mistakes in performing ML g…
    view full post

    August 13, 2023

    5

  • Ming "Tommy" Tang
    @tangming2005 (Twitter)

    RT @jmschreiber91: @tangming2005 Making those mistakes or describing them? I've written a few describing them. Mistakes in performing ML g…
    view full post

    August 13, 2023

    5

  • Ryan T. Scott
    @RyanTScott (Twitter)

    RT @jmschreiber91: @tangming2005 Making those mistakes or describing them? I've written a few describing them. Mistakes in performing ML g…
    view full post

    August 13, 2023

    5

  • Jacob Schreiber
    @jmschreiber91 (Twitter)

    @tangming2005 Making those mistakes or describing them? I've written a few describing them. Mistakes in performing ML generally: (1) https://t.co/c5S73P946f (2) https://t.co/04t5ew7CKq Mistakes in data processing: https://t.co/6vt8CTli7j
    view full post

    August 13, 2023

    15

    5

  • BioDecoded
    @BioDecoded (Twitter)

    The ENCODE Imputation Challenge: a critical assessment of methods for cross-cell type imputation of epigenomic profiles | Genome Biology https://t.co/jxFqUMdnCY #Bioinformatics https://t.co/ATu0swWNuW
    view full post

    April 30, 2023

    12

  • Javier Santoyo
    @jsantoyo (Twitter)

    The ENCODE Imputation Challenge: a critical assessment of methods for cross-cell type imputation of epigenomic profiles. #Imputation #Epigenomics #ENCODE #ToolsBenchmarking @GenomeBiology https://t.co/aRIUPsCwar
    view full post

    April 29, 2023

  • Yang Shen
    @structbioinf (Twitter)

    RT @jmschreiber91: Finally, after ~6 years of work, this is published! https://t.co/6vt8CTli7j Thanks to all my co-authors and the partici…
    view full post

    April 24, 2023

    27

  • Cohesin
    @Xieeee4 (Twitter)

    RT @jmschreiber91: Finally, after ~6 years of work, this is published! https://t.co/6vt8CTli7j Thanks to all my co-authors and the partici…
    view full post

    April 23, 2023

    27

  • Nicholas Mancuso
    @nmancuso_ (Twitter)

    RT @jmschreiber91: Finally, after ~6 years of work, this is published! https://t.co/6vt8CTli7j Thanks to all my co-authors and the partici…
    view full post

    April 20, 2023

    27

  • io
    @io_1337 (Twitter)

    RT @jmschreiber91: Finally, after ~6 years of work, this is published! https://t.co/6vt8CTli7j Thanks to all my co-authors and the partici…
    view full post

    April 20, 2023

    27

  • Yun S. Song
    @yun_s_song (Twitter)

    RT @jmschreiber91: Finally, after ~6 years of work, this is published! https://t.co/6vt8CTli7j Thanks to all my co-authors and the partici…
    view full post

    April 20, 2023

    27

  • Josephine Jung
    @JungJosephine (Twitter)

    RT @jmschreiber91: Finally, after ~6 years of work, this is published! https://t.co/6vt8CTli7j Thanks to all my co-authors and the partici…
    view full post

    April 20, 2023

    27

  • Gherman Novakovsky (слава Україні!
    @NovakovskyG (Twitter)

    RT @jmschreiber91: Finally, after ~6 years of work, this is published! https://t.co/6vt8CTli7j Thanks to all my co-authors and the partici…
    view full post

    April 20, 2023

    27

  • Houlston Lab, ICR
    @HoulstonLab_ICR (Twitter)

    RT @jmschreiber91: Finally, after ~6 years of work, this is published! https://t.co/6vt8CTli7j Thanks to all my co-authors and the partici…
    view full post

    April 20, 2023

    27

  • Veer Keizer
    @VeerKeizer (Twitter)

    RT @jmschreiber91: Finally, after ~6 years of work, this is published! https://t.co/6vt8CTli7j Thanks to all my co-authors and the partici…
    view full post

    April 20, 2023

    27

  • priya joseph
    @ayirpelle (Twitter)

    RT @jmschreiber91: Finally, after ~6 years of work, this is published! https://t.co/6vt8CTli7j Thanks to all my co-authors and the partici…
    view full post

    April 20, 2023

    27

  • Mo Lotfollahi
    @mo_lotfollahi (Twitter)

    RT @jmschreiber91: Finally, after ~6 years of work, this is published! https://t.co/6vt8CTli7j Thanks to all my co-authors and the partici…
    view full post

    April 20, 2023

    27

  • Jen-Chien Chang
    @JenChienChang1 (Twitter)

    RT @jmschreiber91: Finally, after ~6 years of work, this is published! https://t.co/6vt8CTli7j Thanks to all my co-authors and the partici…
    view full post

    April 20, 2023

    27

  • Secant Z
    @abovesummitwz (Twitter)

    RT @jmschreiber91: Finally, after ~6 years of work, this is published! https://t.co/6vt8CTli7j Thanks to all my co-authors and the partici…
    view full post

    April 19, 2023

    27

  • Ryuichiro Nakato (中戸 隆一郎)
    @RyuichiroNakato (Twitter)

    RT @jmschreiber91: Finally, after ~6 years of work, this is published! https://t.co/6vt8CTli7j Thanks to all my co-authors and the partici…
    view full post

    April 19, 2023

    27

  • Vitalii Kleshchevnikov, PhD
    @vitaliikl (Twitter)

    RT @jmschreiber91: Finally, after ~6 years of work, this is published! https://t.co/6vt8CTli7j Thanks to all my co-authors and the partici…
    view full post

    April 19, 2023

    27

  • Manolis Kellis
    @manoliskellis (Twitter)

    RT @jmschreiber91: Finally, after ~6 years of work, this is published! https://t.co/6vt8CTli7j Thanks to all my co-authors and the partici…
    view full post

    April 19, 2023

    27

  • Anshul Kundaje (anshulkundaje@bluesky)
    @anshulkundaje (Twitter)

    RT @jmschreiber91: Finally, after ~6 years of work, this is published! https://t.co/6vt8CTli7j Thanks to all my co-authors and the partici…
    view full post

    April 19, 2023

    27

  • Gene Regulation
    @generegulation (Twitter)

    RT @jmschreiber91: Finally, after ~6 years of work, this is published! https://t.co/6vt8CTli7j Thanks to all my co-authors and the partici…
    view full post

    April 19, 2023

    27

  • Maksim Nesterenko
    @linux_maxima (Twitter)

    RT @jmschreiber91: Finally, after ~6 years of work, this is published! https://t.co/6vt8CTli7j Thanks to all my co-authors and the partici…
    view full post

    April 19, 2023

    27

  • Nathan Skene
    @n_skene (Twitter)

    RT @GenomeBiology: Analysis of the ENCODE Imputation Challenge by @jmschreiber91 @boix_carles & co. @StanfordMed highlights how imputation…
    view full post

    April 19, 2023

    6

  • Joseph D. Janizek
    @joejanizek (Twitter)

    RT @jmschreiber91: Finally, after ~6 years of work, this is published! https://t.co/6vt8CTli7j Thanks to all my co-authors and the partici…
    view full post

    April 19, 2023

    27

  • Nathan Skene
    @n_skene (Twitter)

    RT @jmschreiber91: Finally, after ~6 years of work, this is published! https://t.co/6vt8CTli7j Thanks to all my co-authors and the partici…
    view full post

    April 19, 2023

    27

  • Sasha Gusev
    @SashaGusevPosts (Twitter)

    RT @jmschreiber91: Finally, after ~6 years of work, this is published! https://t.co/6vt8CTli7j Thanks to all my co-authors and the partici…
    view full post

    April 19, 2023

    27

  • Sanjit
    @Sanjitsbatra (Twitter)

    RT @jmschreiber91: Finally, after ~6 years of work, this is published! https://t.co/6vt8CTli7j Thanks to all my co-authors and the partici…
    view full post

    April 19, 2023

    27

  • Joshua G. Schraiber
    @jgschraiber (Twitter)

    RT @jmschreiber91: Finally, after ~6 years of work, this is published! https://t.co/6vt8CTli7j Thanks to all my co-authors and the partici…
    view full post

    April 19, 2023

    27

  • Michael Love
    @mikelove (Twitter)

    RT @jmschreiber91: Finally, after ~6 years of work, this is published! https://t.co/6vt8CTli7j Thanks to all my co-authors and the partici…
    view full post

    April 19, 2023

    27

  • Jacob Schreiber
    @jmschreiber91 (Twitter)

    Finally, after ~6 years of work, this is published! https://t.co/6vt8CTli7j Thanks to all my co-authors and the participants of the challenge for seeing this through. https://t.co/1u8ZfmpoWz
    view full post

    April 19, 2023

    92

    27

  • Agnieszka Golicz
    @AgnieszkaGolicz (Twitter)

    RT @GenomeBiology: Analysis of the ENCODE Imputation Challenge by @jmschreiber91 @boix_carles & co. @StanfordMed highlights how imputation…
    view full post

    April 19, 2023

    6

  • Michael Love
    @mikelove (Twitter)

    RT @GenomeBiology: Analysis of the ENCODE Imputation Challenge by @jmschreiber91 @boix_carles & co. @StanfordMed highlights how imputation…
    view full post

    April 19, 2023

    6

  • Genome Biology
    @GenomeBiology (Twitter)

    Analysis of the ENCODE Imputation Challenge by @jmschreiber91 @boix_carles & co. @StanfordMed highlights how imputation evaluations are challenging & confounded by distributional shifts; and therefore suggest simple steps for overcoming these issues https://t.co/fUOJSiHdRr https://t.co/5DhsJFWvFF
    view full post

    April 19, 2023

    19

    6

  • MyJournals
    @myjournals (Twitter)

    The ENCODE Imputation Challenge: a critical assessment of methods for cross-cell type imputation of epigenomic profiles https://t.co/t7eZwGb4l5
    view full post

    April 18, 2023

  • Helio Rocha
    @_elioRocha (Twitter)

    #bioRxiv The ENCODE Imputation Challenge: A critical assessment of methods for cross-cell type imputation of epigenomic profiles #bioinfo https://t.co/CM0kjXlmXj
    view full post

    August 3, 2022

  • bioRxiv Bioinfo
    @biorxiv_bioinfo (Twitter)

    The ENCODE Imputation Challenge: A critical assessment of methods for cross-cell type imputation of epigenomic profiles https://t.co/6EStHzWWzf #biorxiv_bioinfo
    view full post

    August 2, 2022

    3

  • bioRxiv
    @biorxivpreprint (Twitter)

    The ENCODE Imputation Challenge: A critical assessment of methods for cross-cell type imputation of epigenomic profiles https://t.co/af3z9vULs7 #bioRxiv
    view full post

    August 2, 2022

Abstract Synopsis

  • A new approach to genomics experiments involves doing fewer experiments and using computational methods to fill in the gaps, but there are still uncertainties about which imputation methods work best and how to evaluate their performance effectively.* -
  • The study reviews 23 different methods from the ENCODE Imputation Challenge and discovers that assessing these methods is complicated by factors like changes in data collection practices, varying amounts of data, and overlapping evaluation metrics.* -
  • The authors suggest practical solutions to these challenges and highlight promising areas for future research to improve the robustness of imputation methods in genomics.*