Performance of active learning models for screening prioritization in systematic reviews: a simulation study into the Average Time to Discover relevant records.

Gerbrich Ferdinands, Raoul Schram, Jonathan de Bruin, Ayoub Bagheri, Daniel L Oberski, Lars Tummers, Jelle Jasper Teijema, Rens van de Schoot

June 2023 Syst Rev

Synopsis of Social media discussions

The discussions showcase a keen interest in how active learning models can reduce screening time while maintaining accuracy, with phrases like 'game changer' and 'promising approach' emphasizing their perceived transformative potential. Posts often reference specific technical aspects, such as metrics (ATDBR) and models, reflecting active engagement and recognition of the study's practical impact.

A
Agreement
 Moderate agreement

Most discussions acknowledge the positive findings of the publication, highlighting the effectiveness of active learning models in speeding up systematic reviews.

I
Interest
 High level of interest

Posts demonstrate high interest by exploring implications and potential applications, with some emphasizing how this research could transform review processes.

E
Engagement
 Moderate level of engagement

Comments include references to specific models like support vector machines and metrics such as Time to Discovery, indicating thoughtful engagement.

I
Impact
 Moderate level of impact

Several discussions suggest that this study could significantly influence future practices in systematic reviews and research methodologies.

Social Mentions

YouTube

1 Videos

Twitter

1 Posts

Blogs

2 Articles

Metrics

Video Views

29

Extended Reach

4,116

Social Features

4

Timeline: Posts about article

Top Social Media Posts

Posts referencing the article

Active Learning Models Enhance Systematic Review Screening Efficiency

Active Learning Models Enhance Systematic Review Screening Efficiency

This study compares active learning models like naive Bayes, logistic regression, support vector machines, and random forest to improve screening in systematic reviews. The models significantly reduce screening effort while maintaining high relevance detection.

Medicine RTCL TV

October 6, 2023

29 views

  • General Medicine and Medical Evidence @ BMC
    @MedicalEvidence (Twitter)

    Performance of active learning models for screening prioritization in systematic reviews: a simulation study into the Average Time to Discover relevant records https://t.co/blhRKNZ7Cd
    view full post

    June 20, 2023

Abstract Synopsis

  • This study compares different active learning models and techniques (like naive Bayes, logistic regression, support vector machines, and random forest combined with TFIDF or doc2vec) to see how effectively they can speed up the process of screening records in systematic reviews, while still finding most relevant publications.
  • The models can cut down the number of records that need to be screened by about 91-92% but still identify 95% of all relevant records, using new metrics like Time to Discovery (TD) and Average Time to Discovery (ATDBR) to measure how quickly relevant records are found.
  • Overall, active learning tools show strong promise in making systematic reviews faster and less labor-intensive by prioritizing records likely to be relevant early in the screening process.]