Snus og kreft. Her er min take: https://t.co/446GWCznUi
A systematic review of cancer risk among users of smokeless tobacco (Swedish snus) exclusively, compared with no use of tobacco.
Mentions
Extended reach
Total likes
Video views
Mentions per month
Jul 2023 – Sep 2025Where it's discussed
-
X / Twitter39 posts
-
News18 articles
-
Blogs3 articles
-
YouTube2 videos
AI synopsis
What people are saying
The social discussions reflect a recognition of the research's importance, with posts mentioning the increased risks of cancers such as esophagus and pancreas, and highlighting that although evidence varies, many acknowledge some risk linked to snus use. The tone and language indicate a thoughtful engagement with the evidence, balancing caution and acknowledgment of the ongoing controversy surrounding smokeless tobacco and public health.
Most discussions acknowledge the systematic review's findings about the potential cancer risks associated with Swedish snus, with some posts emphasizing the careful, solid nature of the research.
The participants show moderate interest, referencing specific cancer types and discussing the nuances of the scientific evidence, indicating a focus on the topic's health implications.
The discussions involve references to study details, mentions of related research, and debates about the broader context, showing a fair level of active engagement.
The conversations touch on cultural, health policy, and risk reduction implications, illustrating a moderate perceived impact of the review on public understanding and attitudes.
Abstract in brief
- This systematic review examined the cancer risks and mortality among exclusive Swedish snus users compared to non-tobacco users, analyzing 15 studies with a focus on different types of cancers.
- The findings suggested a potential increased risk of cancers in the esophagus, pancreas, stomach, and rectum, as well as higher mortality after cancer diagnosis among snus users, though the confidence in these results varied from moderate to very low.
- The research mainly included men, limited data on women, and noted some bias concerns related to exposure verification in the studies.]
Top posts
Most liked on X and BlueskyForskning, prosenter, tall og sånn. Godt forklart av @WasimZahid #Dax18 #Folkeopplysning https://t.co/6utCLkpz6N
A systematic review of #cancer risk among users of smokeless tobacco (Swedish #snus) exclusively, compared with no use of tobacco - Valen - International Journal of Cancer - Wiley Online Library https://t.co/KSnqZUK750
@TStalung @Folkehelseinst @LundKarl Jeg tenkte det samme: https://t.co/lFG4KQbKNC
And the big ol' Metastudy: https://t.co/ksXWcLHBkQ bear in mind this is swedish snus, which is steam-cured tobacco, while newer pouches use tobacco-derived nicotine on non-tobacco cellulose
Got popular in athlete, too, in recent years. In the end the solution is “snusless“. #snus #cancer #athletes #tobacco https://t.co/rR09OW1jpc https://t.co/Io4jV66e2J
All mentions
Cancer Risks Associated with Exclusive Swedish Snus Use Systematic Review
This systematic review examines cancer risks and mortality among exclusive Swedish snus users compared to non-tobacco users, analyzing 15 studies focusing on various cancer types and related mortality outcomes.
Cancer Risks Associated with Swedish Snus Use Examined
@realmarcel1 Comme il y a plein de commentaires pas trop sourcés sur la dangerosité, je vous partage ce lien sérieux et complet: le risque de décès par cancer y est de 2.15% pour un jamais fumeur non utilisateur et 2.4% pour un jamais fumeur utilisateur de snus. https://t.co/JxW35Mmbt3
And the big ol' Metastudy: https://t.co/ksXWcLHBkQ bear in mind this is swedish snus, which is steam-cured tobacco, while newer pouches use tobacco-derived nicotine on non-tobacco cellulose
@whywouldthatbe @Feral_Steelhead @Thomashornall For example see link. It is fair to call this a controversial area, like the cancer links to vaping, but there seems little doubt there is some link to cancer. The arguments about comparison to smoking, reducing risk of smoking is a separate issue. https://t.co/qFWPS3qScZ
@Feral_Steelhead @Thomashornall Lack of evidence is not evidence of lack. There are plenty of studies show the link to cancer. Remember that even into the 1980's there were "studies" published showing no link between smoking and cancer There are loads of studies on this https://t.co/qFWPS3qScZ
@viljami101 @SmokeFreeSweden https://t.co/5Sg4DPi2aV
@hubermanlab There are some indications that regular use of pouches may elevate risk of cancer (esophagus, pancreas, stomach and rectum) and increase mortality after cancer diagnosis. Small effects though. https://t.co/MWpVB49bL4 Presence of TSNAs may be important https://t.co/sskGz1lqLQ
@JohnPSharpe @Hugo_Baup https://t.co/2VRMClsX9I
@OliNejad @RianKMD @coopercdavis The various risk estimates vary from moderate through low to very low. https://t.co/KpJcsHU0k6 via @BendikBrinchman et al https://t.co/LojnXRTM1N
Got popular in athlete, too, in recent years. In the end the solution is “snusless“. #snus #cancer #athletes #tobacco https://t.co/rR09OW1jpc https://t.co/Io4jV66e2J
@colchimaxx @FLAHAULT Pour le snus, les risques sont drastiquement plus faibles mais il existe des preuves faibles à modérées de risque de cancer tout de même au niveau oral. Mais mieux vaut bcp moins de risques que plein de risques. Donc snus ok, dim du risque proche vape https://t.co/OwVnGzy2vw
Swedish snus contains TSNA, constituents associated with the formation of DNA adducts and initiation of cancer. Use of snus entails a cancer hazard where the magnitude of cancer risk may be affected by user history and host susceptibility. https://t.co/LGhNhlmJZH
@jkelovuori @r2f2cbbrw6 @TheAthletic There is a more recent systematic review. https://t.co/ApI2mASKwC
@TheAthletic https://t.co/ApI2mASKwC
RT @YannickRomero: A systematic review of #cancer risk among users of smokeless tobacco (Swedish #snus) exclusively, compared with no use o…
RT @YannickRomero: A systematic review of #cancer risk among users of smokeless tobacco (Swedish #snus) exclusively, compared with no use o…
RT @YannickRomero: A systematic review of #cancer risk among users of smokeless tobacco (Swedish #snus) exclusively, compared with no use o…
@BuildToReWild It’s not extremely well studied outside of cigarette smokers but they have studied snus users to a degree and it does raise cancer risk. https://t.co/IzlRF0KkuO
RT @Prebens: @olavtorvund @HFMarthinussen Jeg kan anbefale originalartikkelen. Solid og nyansert. https://t.co/hHj0Eg3iJK
@2masFish @HFMarthinussen Hva prater du om? Snus er ikke forbudt. Les gjerne artikkelen som diskuteres. https://t.co/hHj0Eg3iJK
@olavtorvund @HFMarthinussen Jeg kan anbefale originalartikkelen. Solid og nyansert. https://t.co/hHj0Eg3iJK
@patrikstromer @AronIhse @Douglasthoor Enligt en nyligen publicerad systematisk översikt här i Norden är snus bättre än cigaretter men man löper fortfarande risken att utveckla flera sorters cancer. https://t.co/zAuVlWh6Y2
RT @WasimZahid: Snus og kreft. Her er min take: https://t.co/446GWCznUi
RT @WasimZahid: Snus og kreft. Her er min take: https://t.co/446GWCznUi
Snus og kreft. Her er min take: https://t.co/446GWCznUi
RT @WasimZahid: @TStalung @Folkehelseinst @LundKarl Jeg tenkte det samme: https://t.co/lFG4KQbKNC
RT @HogstadGeir: Forskning, prosenter, tall og sånn. Godt forklart av @WasimZahid #Dax18 #Folkeopplysning https://t.co/6utCLkpz6N
@MortyOlder @anebrei @CiViX Alt dette står i den publiserte studien, og i vedleggene. Konfundere som er kontrollert for i hver brukte studie viser i Tabell S2 her: https://t.co/xjWcXNldpa
RT @WasimZahid: @TStalung @Folkehelseinst @LundKarl Jeg tenkte det samme: https://t.co/lFG4KQbKNC
RT @HogstadGeir: Forskning, prosenter, tall og sånn. Godt forklart av @WasimZahid #Dax18 #Folkeopplysning https://t.co/6utCLkpz6N
Forskning, prosenter, tall og sånn. Godt forklart av @WasimZahid #Dax18 #Folkeopplysning https://t.co/6utCLkpz6N
@TStalung @Folkehelseinst @LundKarl Jeg tenkte det samme: https://t.co/lFG4KQbKNC
@WasimZahid @Folkehelseinst Hva med denne? https://t.co/ArJaTS19Ws
@WasimZahid @Folkehelseinst Her er lenke til studien: https://t.co/ARoOptGg4d
https://t.co/Y4Y0ERmT1D
A systematic review of cancer risk among users of smokeless tobacco (Swedish snus) exclusively, compared with no use of tobacco - PubMed An increased risk of cancer of the esophagus, pancreas, stomach and rectum was reported https://t.co/xMvKaTJvbc
A systematic review of #cancer risk among users of smokeless tobacco (Swedish #snus) exclusively, compared with no use of tobacco - Valen - International Journal of Cancer - Wiley Online Library https://t.co/KSnqZUK750
NOW ONLINE New review reports an increased risk of #cancer of the esophagus, pancreas, stomach and rectum as well as an association between use of #snus and increased mortality after a cancer diagnosis
A systematic review of cancer risk among users of smokeless tobacco (Swedish snus) exclusively, compared with no use of tobacco. https://t.co/cmHPodCxlt https://t.co/FLDxWO2Ke2
An evil attack on Swedish culture from Norwegian brothers A systematic review of cancer risk among users of smokeless tobacco (Swedish snus) exclusively, compared with no use of tobacco - PubMed https://t.co/YcK3zTA6Se