Direct comparison of multiple computer-aided polyp detection systems.

Joel Troya, Boban Sudarevic, Adrian Krenzer, Michael Banck, Markus Brand, Benjamin M Walter, Frank Puppe, Wolfram G Zoller, Alexander Meining, Alexander Hann

January 2024 Endoscopy

Synopsis of Social media discussions

The discussions reflect a strong interest in the technical details and implications of the study, with phrases like 'amazing work' and references to updates and performance metrics. The tone suggests appreciation for the advancements in CADe systems and their potential to improve diagnostics, highlighting the relevance of such research in clinical settings.

A
Agreement
 Moderate agreement

Most discussions recognize the significance of comparing multiple CADe systems and seem to support the study's findings on updates improving detection performance.

I
Interest
 High level of interest

Posts demonstrate high interest, discussing updates, system changes, and the impact of the research, indicating curiosity and relevance to clinical practice.

E
Engagement
 High engagement

Participants deeply engage through sharing commentary, watching videos, and highlighting the importance of the research, showing thoughtful interaction.

I
Impact
 Moderate level of impact

While some posts celebrate the advancements and potential impact on clinical decision-making, the overall tone suggests moderate influence rather than revolutionary change.

Social Mentions

YouTube

1 Videos

Facebook

2 Posts

Twitter

9 Posts

News

2 Articles

Metrics

Video Views

185

Total Likes

40

Extended Reach

39,887

Social Features

14

Timeline: Posts about article

Top Social Media Posts

Posts referencing the article

Comparison of Computer-Aided Polyp Detection Systems in Colonoscopy

Comparison of Computer-Aided Polyp Detection Systems in Colonoscopy

Joel Troya discusses a study comparing different CADe systems using 101 colonoscopy videos, analyzing sensitivity and detection accuracy to help clinicians choose the optimal tools for polyp detection.

endoscopythieme

December 21, 2023

185 views

  • Thieme International
    @ThiemeIntl (Twitter)

    RT @endoscopyjrnl: Read here: https://t.co/RGWOUKVasQ https://t.co/bTR3pNJyB8
    view full post

    January 24, 2024

    2

  • Lu
    @lu_gab13 (Twitter)

    RT @endoscopyjrnl: Read here: https://t.co/RGWOUKVasQ https://t.co/bTR3pNJyB8
    view full post

    January 24, 2024

    2

  • Endoscopy Journal
    @endoscopyjrnl (Twitter)

    Read here: https://t.co/RGWOUKVasQ https://t.co/bTR3pNJyB8
    view full post

    January 24, 2024

    6

    2

  • Joel Troya Sebastian
    @Joeltroyasebas (Twitter)

    RT @endoscopyjrnl: Editor's Choice: Direct comparison of multiple computer-aided polyp detection systems Find the article at: https://t.co…
    view full post

    January 9, 2024

    2

  • Joel Troya Sebastian
    @Joeltroyasebas (Twitter)

    RT @endoscopyjrnl: Author commentary: Joel Troya on "Direct comparison of multiple computer-aided polyp detection systems" Watch the vide…
    view full post

    January 9, 2024

    1

  • Alexander Hann
    @alexsworking (Twitter)

    RT @endoscopyjrnl: Editor's Choice: Direct comparison of multiple computer-aided polyp detection systems Find the article at: https://t.co…
    view full post

    January 8, 2024

    2

  • Endoscopy Journal
    @endoscopyjrnl (Twitter)

    Author commentary: Joel Troya on "Direct comparison of multiple computer-aided polyp detection systems" Watch the video here: https://t.co/fPc1VPJuOh Joel Troya et al. Endoscopy 2024; 56: 63–69 DOI 10.1055/a-2147-0571
    view full post

    January 7, 2024

    5

    1

  • Endoscopy Journal
    @endoscopyjrnl (Twitter)

    Editor's Choice: Direct comparison of multiple computer-aided polyp detection systems Find the article at: https://t.co/RGWOUKUCDi Joel Troya et al. Endoscopy 2024; 56: 63–69 DOI 10.1055/a-2147-0571 https://t.co/rlNAKdXppO
    view full post

    January 5, 2024

    7

    2

  • Alexander Hann
    @alexsworking (Twitter)

    What happens to a CADe system after receiving an update (Gi-Genius), or if you change the detection threshold (ENDO-AID)? We evaluated this for you https://t.co/KDEYhsVh8x Thanks to @Joeltroyasebas for the amazing work https://t.co/QYOwEBoQLf
    view full post

    August 9, 2023

    18

Abstract Synopsis

  • This study compares the effectiveness of different computer-aided polyp detection (CADe) systems, including updates and configuration modes, to help clinicians choose the best option.
  • It analyzed 101 colonoscopy videos with over 129,700 polyp images using three CADe systems: two versions of GI Genius (Types A and B), EndoAID, and EndoMind, measuring sensitivity and false positives.
  • Findings showed that newer system versions, like the later GI Genius and EndoAID Type B, detected nearly all polyps with higher sensitivities, highlighting how system updates impact performance.]