Mentions
Extended reach
Total likes
Video views
AI synopsis
The discussions demonstrate strong agreement, with participants praising the paper as a definitive refutation of creationist claims, using phrases like 'directly refuted' and 'debunk.' The tone is enthusiastic and confident, reflecting high interest and perceived importance, especially with mentions of live breakdowns and sharing of the paper's links to emphasize the paper's influence on ongoing debates.
Most discussions strongly support the paper, emphasizing its success in refuting creationist critiques of Fisher's theorem.
Participants show high enthusiasm and curiosity, engaging with detailed breakdowns and live discussions about the research.
Posts include live events, links to the paper, and detailed mathematical analyses, indicating deep involvement.
The discussion highlights the publication's significance in advancing scientific debates and countering creationist misinformation.
Guys two of my friends PUBLISHED a creationist debunk lmao https://t.co/KjMn3rXWXw https://t.co/v9VmaDPlTL They're giving pdfs away so just ask if you want one (them not me lol)
Hey I wonder if any creationists are going to respond to the direct refutations of one of their few peer-reviewed papers, or if they're just gonna take the L. What do you think, @zachbbionerd? https://t.co/QFzq92mxFs
Tomorrow, 9pm eastern: @zachbbionerd joins me to talk about our new paper! We directly refuted a real peer reviewed creationist paper, AND showed how “genetic entropy” fails! It’s a BFD. Don’t miss this one, folks. https://t.co/k0ThnEuMr6
Cat's out of the bag, @zachbbionerd and I co-authored a paper directly refuting Basener and Sanford (2018) on Fisher's fundamental theorem or natural selection. And it's also a direct refutation of silly "genetic entropy"! https://t.co/4CD1aOTXx3
TONIGHT: Dr. Zach Hancock (@zachbbionerd) breaks down the math of our new paper in the Journal of Mathematical Biology, which refutes Basener and Sanford (2018), and shows that "genetic entropy" is nonsense. 8pm Eastern, April 9th, 2024. https://t.co/2uxzwPjgU7
Back to the fundamentals: a reply to Basener and Sanford 2018 https://t.co/6bXDzd7aTS https://t.co/kiW17z1fzO
Creationists sometimes have papers published in peer-reviewed journals and claim they remain unrefuted. This video presents examples of direct scientific refutations, including a recent paper authored by talkpopgen and…
This video explains how to derive Fisher's fundamental theorem of natural selection from Price's theorem without simplifying assumptions, clarifying its fundamental role in evolutionary theory and addressing recent…
This video provides a detailed response to Basener and Sanford 2018, explaining the evolution of Fisher's theorem since 1930, its general applicability, and addressing misinterpretations and criticisms related to…
@ApoloJedi_ https://t.co/5v1GhLzmSP
@Moonmudpie43270 @Baalzel @Malka_Sargon https://t.co/6zisdzRdXu
RT @theevilutionist: Hey I wonder if any creationists are going to respond to the direct refutations of one of their few peer-reviewed pape…
RT @theevilutionist: Hey I wonder if any creationists are going to respond to the direct refutations of one of their few peer-reviewed pape…
RT @theevilutionist: Hey I wonder if any creationists are going to respond to the direct refutations of one of their few peer-reviewed pape…
RT @theevilutionist: Hey I wonder if any creationists are going to respond to the direct refutations of one of their few peer-reviewed pape…
RT @theevilutionist: Hey I wonder if any creationists are going to respond to the direct refutations of one of their few peer-reviewed pape…
Hey I wonder if any creationists are going to respond to the direct refutations of one of their few peer-reviewed papers, or if they're just gonna take the L. What do you think, @zachbbionerd? https://t.co/QFzq92mxFs
RT @theevilutionist: Want to understand the paper @zachbbionerd and I wrote refuting a 2018 creationist paper (a legit peer reviewed paper!…
@zachbbionerd And, highly recommended, here's a detailed breakdown of the math from @zachbbionerd: https://t.co/LZsG3K0hQw
@zachbbionerd Here's the paper itself: https://t.co/4CD1aOTXx3
Want to understand the paper @zachbbionerd and I wrote refuting a 2018 creationist paper (a legit peer reviewed paper!)? Here's a breakdown: https://t.co/QFzq92lZPU
RT @theevilutionist: Tomorrow, 9pm eastern: @zachbbionerd joins me to talk about our new paper! We directly refuted a real peer reviewed cr…
RT @theevilutionist: Tomorrow, 9pm eastern: @zachbbionerd joins me to talk about our new paper! We directly refuted a real peer reviewed cr…
Tomorrow, 9pm eastern: @zachbbionerd joins me to talk about our new paper! We directly refuted a real peer reviewed creationist paper, AND showed how “genetic entropy” fails! It’s a BFD. Don’t miss this one, folks. https://t.co/k0ThnEuMr6
@zachbbionerd Remember, lit review, live, April 24th, 9pm eastern: https://t.co/QFzq92lZPU
Back to the fundamentals: a reply to Basener and Sanford 2018 https://t.co/6bXDzd7aTS https://t.co/kiW17z1fzO
The following week, April 24th, 2024, literature review with @zachbbionerd going over our new paper in the Journal of Mathematical Biology: https://t.co/QFzq92lZPU This is a direct response and refutation to Basener and Sanford (2018).
@Eric_BereanArch @DanGraur No, this has been debunked https://t.co/p4AzlGgUln
RT @theevilutionist: TONIGHT: Dr. Zach Hancock (@zachbbionerd) breaks down the math of our new paper in the Journal of Mathematical Biolog…
RT @theevilutionist: TONIGHT: Dr. Zach Hancock (@zachbbionerd) breaks down the math of our new paper in the Journal of Mathematical Biolog…
RT @theevilutionist: TONIGHT: Dr. Zach Hancock (@zachbbionerd) breaks down the math of our new paper in the Journal of Mathematical Biolog…
RT @theevilutionist: TONIGHT: Dr. Zach Hancock (@zachbbionerd) breaks down the math of our new paper in the Journal of Mathematical Biolog…
RT @theevilutionist: TONIGHT: Dr. Zach Hancock (@zachbbionerd) breaks down the math of our new paper in the Journal of Mathematical Biolog…
RT @theevilutionist: TONIGHT: Dr. Zach Hancock (@zachbbionerd) breaks down the math of our new paper in the Journal of Mathematical Biolog…
TONIGHT: Dr. Zach Hancock (@zachbbionerd) breaks down the math of our new paper in the Journal of Mathematical Biology, which refutes Basener and Sanford (2018), and shows that "genetic entropy" is nonsense. 8pm Eastern, April 9th, 2024. https://t.co/2uxzwPjgU7
"Thus, we’ve added nothing additional to the understanding of Fisher’s theorem; in this way, our contribution to Fisher’s theorem is equal to that of Basener and Sanford (2018)." Congrats on your paper, @zachbbionerd & @theevilutionist! https://t.co/9UHYo0DO0a
RT @Gutsick_Gibbon: Guys two of my friends PUBLISHED a creationist debunk lmao https://t.co/KjMn3rXWXw https://t.co/v9VmaDPlTL They're…
RT @Gutsick_Gibbon: Guys two of my friends PUBLISHED a creationist debunk lmao https://t.co/KjMn3rXWXw https://t.co/v9VmaDPlTL They're…
RT @Gutsick_Gibbon: Guys two of my friends PUBLISHED a creationist debunk lmao https://t.co/KjMn3rXWXw https://t.co/v9VmaDPlTL They're…
RT @theevilutionist: Cat's out of the bag, @zachbbionerd and I co-authored a paper directly refuting Basener and Sanford (2018) on Fisher's…
RT @Gutsick_Gibbon: Guys two of my friends PUBLISHED a creationist debunk lmao https://t.co/KjMn3rXWXw https://t.co/v9VmaDPlTL They're…
RT @Gutsick_Gibbon: Guys two of my friends PUBLISHED a creationist debunk lmao https://t.co/KjMn3rXWXw https://t.co/v9VmaDPlTL They're…
RT @Gutsick_Gibbon: Guys two of my friends PUBLISHED a creationist debunk lmao https://t.co/KjMn3rXWXw https://t.co/v9VmaDPlTL They're…
RT @Gutsick_Gibbon: Guys two of my friends PUBLISHED a creationist debunk lmao https://t.co/KjMn3rXWXw https://t.co/v9VmaDPlTL They're…
RT @Gutsick_Gibbon: Guys two of my friends PUBLISHED a creationist debunk lmao https://t.co/KjMn3rXWXw https://t.co/v9VmaDPlTL They're…
RT @Gutsick_Gibbon: Guys two of my friends PUBLISHED a creationist debunk lmao https://t.co/KjMn3rXWXw https://t.co/v9VmaDPlTL They're…
RT @Gutsick_Gibbon: Guys two of my friends PUBLISHED a creationist debunk lmao https://t.co/KjMn3rXWXw https://t.co/v9VmaDPlTL They're…
RT @Gutsick_Gibbon: Guys two of my friends PUBLISHED a creationist debunk lmao https://t.co/KjMn3rXWXw https://t.co/v9VmaDPlTL They're…
Guys two of my friends PUBLISHED a creationist debunk lmao https://t.co/KjMn3rXWXw https://t.co/v9VmaDPlTL They're giving pdfs away so just ask if you want one (them not me lol)
@RJDownard @theevilutionist @zachbbionerd I have it here, under this link: https://t.co/x6JsFe4KNN
Creation Myth: "Evolutionists" Don't Rebut Creationist Papers https://t.co/Iz4b55xjBE via @YouTube
RT @theevilutionist: Cat's out of the bag, @zachbbionerd and I co-authored a paper directly refuting Basener and Sanford (2018) on Fisher's…
RT @theevilutionist: Cat's out of the bag, @zachbbionerd and I co-authored a paper directly refuting Basener and Sanford (2018) on Fisher's…
Thrilled to have contributed to this with @zachbbionerd https://t.co/3kEeYnRvu1
RT @theevilutionist: 8pm EDT TONIGHT: https://t.co/fZRtF44BHj You're not gonna want to miss this one. Trust me.
RT @theevilutionist: @zachbbionerd Related video with reveal: https://t.co/fZRtF44BHj
RT @theevilutionist: Cat's out of the bag, @zachbbionerd and I co-authored a paper directly refuting Basener and Sanford (2018) on Fisher's…
RT @theevilutionist: Cat's out of the bag, @zachbbionerd and I co-authored a paper directly refuting Basener and Sanford (2018) on Fisher's…
RT @theevilutionist: Cat's out of the bag, @zachbbionerd and I co-authored a paper directly refuting Basener and Sanford (2018) on Fisher's…
@zachbbionerd Related video with reveal: https://t.co/fZRtF44BHj
Cat's out of the bag, @zachbbionerd and I co-authored a paper directly refuting Basener and Sanford (2018) on Fisher's fundamental theorem or natural selection. And it's also a direct refutation of silly "genetic entropy"! https://t.co/4CD1aOTXx3
8pm EDT TONIGHT: https://t.co/fZRtF44BHj You're not gonna want to miss this one. Trust me.
com/article/10.1007/s00285-024-02077-w https://youtu.be/5TdPBWwbZAw. Back to the fundamentals: a reply to Basener and Sanford 2018 - Journal ...
com/article/10.1007/s00285-024-02077-w](https: //link.springer. com/article/10.1007/s00285-024-02077- w?fbclid=IwAR3doXQQFxnlMNA-mYvY9mywd0d ...
springer. com/article/10.1007/s00285-024-02077- w?fbclid=IwAR3doXQQFxnlMNA-mYvY9mywd0d- jNKttTGOxnMrNm344LYQvL- ...
com/article/10.1007/s00285-024-02077-w](https: //link.springer. com/article/10.1007/s00285-024-02077- w?fbclid=IwAR3doXQQFxnlMNA-mYvY9mywd0d ...
com/article/10.1007/s00285-024-02077-w https://youtu.be/5TdPBWwbZAw. Back to the fundamentals: a reply to Basener and Sanford 2018 - Journal ...
org/10.1007/s00285-024-02077-w https://youtu.be/8zIWf- dd398?si=6kWFYuPgtMbsSBZC. Deriving Fisher's Theorem: The Math Behind the Sanford ...
com/article/10.1007/s00285-024-02077-w https://youtu.be/5TdPBWwbZAw. Back to the fundamentals: a reply to Basener and Sanford 2018 - Journal ...
com/article/10.1007/s00285-024-02077-w](https: //link.springer. com/article/10.1007/s00285-024-02077- w?fbclid=IwAR3doXQQFxnlMNA-mYvY9mywd0d ...
com/article/10.1007/s00285-024-02077-w https://youtu.be/5TdPBWwbZAw. Back to the fundamentals: a reply to Basener and Sanford 2018 - Journal ...
com/article/10.1007/s00285-017-1190-x](https: //link.springer. com ... com/article/10.1007/s00285-024-02077- w?fbclid=IwAR3doXQQFxnlMNA ...
org/10.1007/s00285-024-02077-w https://youtu.be/8zIWf- dd398?si ... com/article/10.1007/s00285-024-02077- w?fbclid=IwAR3doXQQFxnlMNA ...
com/article/10.1007/s00285-024-02077-w](https: //link.springer. com/article/10.1007/s00285-024-02077- w?fbclid=IwAR3doXQQFxnlMNA-mYvY9mywd0d ...
com/article/10.1007/s00285-024-02077-w](https: //link.springer. com/article/10.1007/s00285-024-02077- w?fbclid=IwAR3doXQQFxnlMNA-mYvY9mywd0d ...
springer. com/article/10.1007/s00285-024-02077- w?fbclid=IwAR3doXQQFxnlMNA-mYvY9mywd0d- jNKttTGOxnMrNm344LYQvL- ...
org/10.1007/s00285-024-02077-w https://youtu.be/8zIWf- dd398?si ... com/article/10.1007/s00285-024-02077- w?fbclid=IwAR3doXQQFxnlMNA ...
org/10.1007/s00285-024-02077-w https://youtu.be/8zIWf- dd398?si=6kWFYuPgtMbsSBZC. Deriving Fisher's Theorem: The Math Behind the Sanford Debunk.
com/article/10.1007/s00285-024-02077-w](https: //link.springer. com/article/10.1007/s00285-024-02077- w?fbclid=IwAR3doXQQFxnlMNA-mYvY9mywd0d ...
com/article/10.1007/s00285-024-02077-w](https: //link.springer. com/article/10.1007/s00285-024-02077- w?fbclid=IwAR3doXQQFxnlMNA-mYvY9mywd0d ...
com/article/10.1007/s00285-024-02077-w](https: //link.springer. com/article/10.1007/s00285-024-02077- w?fbclid=IwAR3doXQQFxnlMNA-mYvY9mywd0d ...
com/article/10.1007/s00285-024-02077-w](https: //link.springer. com/article/10.1007/s00285-024-02077- w?fbclid=IwAR3doXQQFxnlMNA-mYvY9mywd0d ...
springer. com/article/10.1007/s00285-024-02077- w?fbclid=IwAR3doXQQFxnlMNA-mYvY9mywd0d- jNKttTGOxnMrNm344LYQvL- ...
com/article/10.1007/s00285-024-02077-w](https: //link.springer. com/article/10.1007/s00285-024-02077- w?fbclid=IwAR3doXQQFxnlMNA-mYvY9mywd0d ...
com/article/10.1007/s00285-024-02077-w](https: //link.springer. com/article/10.1007/s00285-024-02077- w?fbclid=IwAR3doXQQFxnlMNA-mYvY9mywd0d ...
org/10.1007/s00285-024-02077-w https://youtu.be/8zIWf- dd398?si ... com/article/10.1007/s00285-024-02077- w?fbclid=IwAR3doXQQFxnlMNA ...
com/article/10.1007/s00285-024-02077-w](https: //link.springer. com/article/10.1007/s00285-024-02077- w?fbclid=IwAR3doXQQFxnlMNA-mYvY9mywd0d ...
com/article/10.1007/s00285-024-02077-w](https: //link.springer. com/article/10.1007/s00285-024-02077- w?fbclid=IwAR3doXQQFxnlMNA-mYvY9mywd0d ...
org/10.1007/s00285-024-02077-w https://youtu.be/8zIWf- dd398?si ... com/article/10.1007/s00285-024-02077- w?fbclid=IwAR3doXQQFxnlMNA ...
com/article/10.1007/s00285-024-02077-w](https: //link.springer. com/article/10.1007/s00285-024-02077- w?fbclid=IwAR3doXQQFxnlMNA-mYvY9mywd0d ...
com/article/10.1007/s00285-024-02077-w](https: //link.springer. com/article/10.1007/s00285-024-02077- w?fbclid=IwAR3doXQQFxnlMNA-mYvY9mywd0d ...
springer. com/article/10.1007/s00285-024-02077- w?fbclid=IwAR3doXQQFxnlMNA-mYvY9mywd0d- jNKttTGOxnMrNm344LYQvL- ...
com/article/10.1007/s00285-024-02077-w](https: //link.springer. com/article/10.1007/s00285-024-02077- w?fbclid=IwAR3doXQQFxnlMNA-mYvY9mywd0d ...
org/10.1007/s00285-024-02077-w https://youtu.be/8zIWf- dd398?si=6kWFYuPgtMbsSBZC. Deriving Fisher's Theorem: The Math Behind the Sanford ...
com/article/10.1007/s00285-024-02077-w https://youtu.be/5TdPBWwbZAw. Creation Myth: "Evolutionists" Don't Rebut Creationist Papers. Sean ...
com/article/10.1007/s00285-024-02077-w](https: //link.springer. com/article/10.1007/s00285-024-02077- w?fbclid=IwAR3doXQQFxnlMNA-mYvY9mywd0d ...
com/article/10.1007/s00285-024-02077-w](https: //link.springer. com/article/10.1007/s00285-024-02077- w?fbclid=IwAR3doXQQFxnlMNA-mYvY9mywd0d ...
com/article/10.1007/s00285-024-02077-w](https: //link.springer. com/article/10.1007/s00285-024-02077- w?fbclid=IwAR3doXQQFxnlMNA-mYvY9mywd0d ...
springer. com/article/10.1007/s00285-024-02077- w?fbclid=IwAR3doXQQFxnlMNA-mYvY9mywd0d- jNKttTGOxnMrNm344LYQvL- ...
com/article/10.1007/s00285-024-02077-w](https: //link.springer. com/article/10.1007/s00285-024-02077- w?fbclid=IwAR3doXQQFxnlMNA-mYvY9mywd0d ...
com/article/10.1007/s00285-024-02077-w](https: //link.springer. com/article/10.1007/s00285-024-02077- w?fbclid=IwAR3doXQQFxnlMNA-mYvY9mywd0d ...
org/10.1007/s00285-024-02077-w https://youtu.be/8zIWf- dd398?si=6kWFYuPgtMbsSBZC. Deriving Fisher's Theorem: The Math Behind the Sanford Debunk.
com/article/10.1007/s00285-024-02077-w](https: //link.springer. com/article/10.1007/s00285-024-02077- w?fbclid=IwAR3doXQQFxnlMNA-mYvY9mywd0d ...
com/article/10.1007/s00285-024-02077-w](https: //link.springer. com/article/10.1007/s00285-024-02077- w?fbclid=IwAR3doXQQFxnlMNA-mYvY9mywd0d ...
com/article/10.1007/s00285-024-02077-w](https: //link.springer. com/article/10.1007/s00285-024-02077- w?fbclid=IwAR3doXQQFxnlMNA-mYvY9mywd0d ...
org/10.1007/s00285-024-02077-w https://youtu.be/8zIWf- dd398?si=6kWFYuPgtMbsSBZC. Deriving Fisher's Theorem: The Math Behind the Sanford ...
com/article/10.1007/s00285-024-02077-w](https: //link.springer. com/article/10.1007/s00285-024-02077- w?fbclid=IwAR3doXQQFxnlMNA-mYvY9mywd0d ...
com/article/10.1007/s00285-024-02077-w](https: //link.springer. com/article/10.1007/s00285-024-02077- w?fbclid=IwAR3doXQQFxnlMNA-mYvY9mywd0d ...
com/article/10.1007/s00285-024-02077-w](https: //link.springer. com/article/10.1007/s00285-024-02077- w?fbclid=IwAR3doXQQFxnlMNA-mYvY9mywd0d ...
com/article/10.1007/s00285-024-02077-w](https: //link.springer. com/article/10.1007/s00285-024-02077- w?fbclid=IwAR3doXQQFxnlMNA-mYvY9mywd0d ...
com/article/10.1007/s00285-024-02077-w](https: //link.springer. com/article/10.1007/s00285-024-02077- w?fbclid=IwAR3doXQQFxnlMNA-mYvY9mywd0d ...
com/article/10.1007/s00285-024-02077-w](https: //link.springer. com/article/10.1007/s00285-024-02077- w?fbclid=IwAR3doXQQFxnlMNA-mYvY9mywd0d ...
CM
TA
M
WM
J
JR
DD
NM
DC
JN
DN