Synopsis of Social media discussions

This collection of discussions mainly highlights the publication's recent release, with the tone being professional and neutral, exemplified by the straightforward announcement of its appearance in a reputable journal. The words used emphasize the research's credibility and relevance, but there is little indication of controversy or strong emotional reactions, which aligns with moderate interest and engagement levels.

A
Agreement
Neither agree nor disagree

The discussion seems neutral, with the main post announcing the publication without explicit opinions, indicating neither strong support nor disagreement.

I
Interest
Moderate level of interest

The mention of the publication in an academic journal suggests some interest but limited enthusiasm, as the focus is more informational than provocative.

E
Engagement
Moderate level of engagement

The post invites academic or professional interest but does not show deep discussion or critical analysis, reflecting moderate engagement.

I
Impact
Neutral impact

While the publication advances knowledge in digital fertility tools, the discussion itself appears to have limited immediate influence on broader societal attitudes.

Social Mentions

YouTube

1 Videos

Twitter

1 Posts

Metrics

Video Views

26,828

Total Likes

64

Extended Reach

30,979

Social Features

2

Timeline: Posts about article

Top Social Media Posts

Posts referencing the article

Understanding Fertile Windows and Ovulation Tracking Accuracy

Understanding Fertile Windows and Ovulation Tracking Accuracy

Are you tracking your cycle correctly? Only 13 percent of women ovulate on day 14, impacting fertility predictions. This video explains how ovulation tracking works, its effectiveness, and how understanding your body can improve reproductive health.

March 6, 2025

26,828 views


  • Natural Cycles°
    @NaturalCycles (Twitter)

    Our paper, “Time to pregnancy recognition among users of an FDA-cleared fertility application” has been published in the Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology @tandfonline
    view full post

    May 24, 2024

    1

Abstract Synopsis

  • The study analyzed data from over 23,700 pregnancies to understand how quickly users of an FDA-cleared fertility app recognize pregnancy, finding that those trying to conceive recognized pregnancy earlier (about 31 days) compared to those using the app for contraception (about 36 days).
  • Using statistical tests, the research highlights the potential benefits of digital fertility apps in aiding timely pregnancy recognition, which can improve health management and reduce risks.
  • However, the findings are limited because the participants were mainly non-Hispanic White women with higher education levels, all of whom used a fertility app, meaning results may not apply broadly to more diverse populations.