Comparison of disposable digital single-operator cholangioscopy versus direct peroral cholangioscopy for the diagnosis of intraductal superficial lesions of the bile duct.
Il Sang Shin, Jong Ho Moon, Yun Nah Lee, Hee Kyung Kim, Jun Chul Chung, Tae Hoon Lee, Jae Kook Yang, Young Deok Cho, Sang-Heum Park
October 2024 EndoscopySynopsis of Social media discussions
Participants discuss the comparative advantages of DSOC and DPOC, with some emphasizing DPOC's superior visualization, while others highlight DSOC's quicker procedure time, reflecting balanced considerations. The tone is analytical, focusing on the practical application and clinical significance of the findings, thus indicating moderate engagement and impact.
Agreement
Moderate agreementSeveral discussions seem to agree that both methods have their merits, with some favoring DPOC's visualization and others noting DSOC's speed, indicating a general consensus on the importance of clinical context.
Interest
Moderate level of interestThe discussions show moderate interest, as users highlight specific aspects like procedure times and visualization quality, but there is limited deep exploration of broader implications.
Engagement
Moderate level of engagementMany discussions reference key findings and practical considerations, such as success rates and visualization quality, indicating a thoughtful level of engagement.
Impact
Moderate level of impactThe conversations suggest that the publication could influence clinical decision-making, especially in choosing the technique based on specific patient needs, which denotes a moderate impact.
Social Mentions
YouTube
1 Videos
2 Posts
3 Posts
Metrics
Video Views
129
Total Likes
13
Extended Reach
28,861
Social Features
6
Timeline: Posts about article
Top Social Media Posts
Posts referencing the article
Comparison of Single-Operator Digital Cholangioscopy and Peroral Cholangioscopy for Bile Duct Lesion Diagnosis
This study compares digital single-operator cholangioscopy and direct peroral cholangioscopy using ultraslim endoscopes for diagnosing intraductal superficial bile duct lesions. It highlights differences in procedure time, success rates, and visualization quality.
-
#AuthorCommentary: Il Sang Shin on "Comparison of disposable digital single-operator cholangioscopy versus direct peroral cholangioscopy for the diagnosis of intraductal superficial lesions of the bile duct" Watch: https://t.co/BAtEodTopg See article : https://t.co/YL4CbDpskc
view full postOctober 10, 2024
1
-
EUS & ERCP Master
@GIscope_updates (Twitter)RT @endoscopyjrnl: Editor's Choice: Diagnosis of lesions of the bile duct - D-SOC vs. D-POC Find the article at: https://t.co/YL4CbDpsk…
view full postOctober 9, 2024
1
-
Endoscopy Journal
@endoscopyjrnl (Twitter)Editor's Choice: Diagnosis of lesions of the bile duct - D-SOC vs. D-POC Find the article at: https://t.co/YL4CbDpskc Il Sang Shin et al. https://t.co/lk75adDIlR
view full postOctober 9, 2024
9
1
Abstract Synopsis
- The study compares digital single-operator cholangioscopy (DSOC) and direct peroral cholangioscopy (DPOC) using ultraslim endoscopes for diagnosing intraductal superficial lesions of the bile duct, finding DSOC to have a shorter procedure time and similar success rates but DPOC providing better visualization.
- Although DSOC had a higher, though not statistically significant, success rate and a marginally lower detection rate of lesions compared to DPOC, both methods were found to be safe and effective for diagnosing small bile duct lesions.
- DPOC offered superior visualization quality and microvascular detail, while DSOC was faster and showed a trend toward higher technical success, making both techniques useful depending on clinical needs.]
Endoscopy Journal
@endoscopyjrnl (Twitter)