Synopsis of Social media discussions

Participants discuss the comparative advantages of DSOC and DPOC, with some emphasizing DPOC's superior visualization, while others highlight DSOC's quicker procedure time, reflecting balanced considerations. The tone is analytical, focusing on the practical application and clinical significance of the findings, thus indicating moderate engagement and impact.

A
Agreement
Moderate agreement

Several discussions seem to agree that both methods have their merits, with some favoring DPOC's visualization and others noting DSOC's speed, indicating a general consensus on the importance of clinical context.

I
Interest
Moderate level of interest

The discussions show moderate interest, as users highlight specific aspects like procedure times and visualization quality, but there is limited deep exploration of broader implications.

E
Engagement
Moderate level of engagement

Many discussions reference key findings and practical considerations, such as success rates and visualization quality, indicating a thoughtful level of engagement.

I
Impact
Moderate level of impact

The conversations suggest that the publication could influence clinical decision-making, especially in choosing the technique based on specific patient needs, which denotes a moderate impact.

Social Mentions

YouTube

1 Videos

Facebook

2 Posts

Twitter

3 Posts

Metrics

Video Views

129

Total Likes

13

Extended Reach

28,861

Social Features

6

Timeline: Posts about article

Top Social Media Posts

Posts referencing the article

Comparison of Single-Operator Digital Cholangioscopy and Peroral Cholangioscopy for Bile Duct Lesion Diagnosis

Comparison of Single-Operator Digital Cholangioscopy and Peroral Cholangioscopy for Bile Duct Lesion Diagnosis

This study compares digital single-operator cholangioscopy and direct peroral cholangioscopy using ultraslim endoscopes for diagnosing intraductal superficial bile duct lesions. It highlights differences in procedure time, success rates, and visualization quality.

September 27, 2024

129 views


  • Endoscopy Journal
    @endoscopyjrnl (Twitter)

    #AuthorCommentary: Il Sang Shin on "Comparison of disposable digital single-operator cholangioscopy versus direct peroral cholangioscopy for the diagnosis of intraductal superficial lesions of the bile duct" Watch: https://t.co/BAtEodTopg See article : https://t.co/YL4CbDpskc
    view full post

    October 10, 2024

    1

  • EUS & ERCP Master
    @GIscope_updates (Twitter)

    RT @endoscopyjrnl: Editor's Choice: Diagnosis of lesions of the bile duct - D-SOC vs. D-POC Find the article at: https://t.co/YL4CbDpsk…
    view full post

    October 9, 2024

    1

  • Endoscopy Journal
    @endoscopyjrnl (Twitter)

    Editor's Choice: Diagnosis of lesions of the bile duct - D-SOC vs. D-POC Find the article at: https://t.co/YL4CbDpskc Il Sang Shin et al. https://t.co/lk75adDIlR
    view full post

    October 9, 2024

    9

    1

Abstract Synopsis

  • The study compares digital single-operator cholangioscopy (DSOC) and direct peroral cholangioscopy (DPOC) using ultraslim endoscopes for diagnosing intraductal superficial lesions of the bile duct, finding DSOC to have a shorter procedure time and similar success rates but DPOC providing better visualization.
  • Although DSOC had a higher, though not statistically significant, success rate and a marginally lower detection rate of lesions compared to DPOC, both methods were found to be safe and effective for diagnosing small bile duct lesions.
  • DPOC offered superior visualization quality and microvascular detail, while DSOC was faster and showed a trend toward higher technical success, making both techniques useful depending on clinical needs.]