Endoscopy October 2024 PMID 38718833

Comparison of disposable digital single-operator cholangioscopy versus direct peroral cholangioscopy for the diagnosis of intraductal superficial lesions of the bile duct.

Il Sang Shin, Jong Ho Moon, Yun Nah Lee, Hee Kyung Kim, Jun Chul Chung, Tae Hoon Lee, Jae Kook Yang, Young Deok Cho, Sang-Heum Park

Full text PDF Download social card

Mentions

Peak: 3 in Oct 2024

across 3 sources since Sep 2024

Extended reach

28,861

potential audience

Total likes

Video views

129

Mentions per month

Sep 2024 – Oct 2024

Where it's discussed

X / Twitter3 posts
Facebook2 posts
YouTube1 videos

AI synopsis

What people are saying

Participants discuss the comparative advantages of DSOC and DPOC, with some emphasizing DPOC's superior visualization, while others highlight DSOC's quicker procedure time, reflecting balanced considerations. The tone is analytical, focusing on the practical application and clinical significance of the findings, thus indicating moderate engagement and impact.

AgreementModerate agreement

Several discussions seem to agree that both methods have their merits, with some favoring DPOC's visualization and others noting DSOC's speed, indicating a general consensus on the importance of clinical context.

InterestModerate interest

The discussions show moderate interest, as users highlight specific aspects like procedure times and visualization quality, but there is limited deep exploration of broader implications.

EngagementModerate engagement

Many discussions reference key findings and practical considerations, such as success rates and visualization quality, indicating a thoughtful level of engagement.

ImpactModerate impact

The conversations suggest that the publication could influence clinical decision-making, especially in choosing the technique based on specific patient needs, which denotes a moderate impact.

Abstract in brief

The study compares digital single-operator cholangioscopy (DSOC) and direct peroral cholangioscopy (DPOC) using ultraslim endoscopes for diagnosing intraductal superficial lesions of the bile duct, finding DSOC to have a shorter procedure time and similar success rates but DPOC providing better visualization.
Although DSOC had a higher, though not statistically significant, success rate and a marginally lower detection rate of lesions compared to DPOC, both methods were found to be safe and effective for diagnosing small bile duct lesions.
DPOC offered superior visualization quality and microvascular detail, while DSOC was faster and showed a trend toward higher technical success, making both techniques useful depending on clinical needs.]

Read the full abstract

All mentions

Comparison of Single-Operator Digital Cholangioscopy and Peroral Cholangioscopy for Bile Duct Lesion Diagnosis

This study compares digital single-operator cholangioscopy and direct peroral cholangioscopy using ultraslim endoscopes for diagnosing intraductal superficial bile duct lesions. It highlights differences in procedure…

endoscopythieme · Sep 27, 2024 129 views

Endoscopy Journal

@endoscopyjrnl · X

Oct 10, 2024 · 1 like · 11,535 followers View post →

EUS & ERCP Master

@GIscope_updates · X

RT @endoscopyjrnl: Editor's Choice: Diagnosis of lesions of the bile duct - D-SOC vs. D-POC Find the article at: https://t.co/YL4CbDpsk…

Oct 9, 2024 · 1 share · 5,640 followers View post →