Synopsis of Social media discussions

The group is somewhat intrigued by the trial, as seen in posts highlighting it as an 'editor's choice' and sharing links to the article, but they stop short of in-depth discussion about the implications. For example, comments like 'Check out for more' and references to author commentaries indicate a basic level of engagement focused on dissemination rather than critique or analysis, which explains the moderate scores across the dimensions.

A
Agreement
Neither agree nor disagree

The discussions show mixed reactions; some appreciate the trial and its findings, while others question the true benefit of the CADe system given its limited improvements.

I
Interest
Moderate level of interest

Posts display moderate interest, with some sharing links and calling the study 'editor's choice,' but few delve into detailed analysis.

E
Engagement
Moderate level of engagement

Participants generally acknowledge the research but do not deeply analyze its methodologies or broader implications, indicating moderate engagement.

I
Impact
Neutral impact

While the study seems to inform ongoing debates about CADe effectiveness, the overall consensus suggests the impact on clinical practice may be limited at this stage.

Social Mentions

YouTube

1 Videos

Facebook

2 Posts

Twitter

5 Posts

Metrics

Video Views

42

Total Likes

18

Extended Reach

49,455

Social Features

8

Timeline: Posts about article

Top Social Media Posts

Posts referencing the article

Assessment of Computer-Aided Detection in Routine Colonoscopy Effectiveness

Assessment of Computer-Aided Detection in Routine Colonoscopy Effectiveness

Michiel Maas discusses a randomized trial evaluating a computer-aided detection system in diagnostic, screening, and surveillance colonoscopy, highlighting its limited impact on adenoma detection and increased sessile serrated lesion detection.

October 30, 2024

42 views


  • Endoscopy Journal
    @endoscopyjrnl (Twitter)

    Check out for more: https://t.co/wRZmLsRa0R https://t.co/qQJg4gU1PI
    view full post

    November 14, 2024

    5

  • Endoscopy Journal
    @endoscopyjrnl (Twitter)

    #AuthorCommentary: Michiel Maas on "computer-aided detection system in the everyday setting of diagnostic, screening, and surveillance colonoscopy: an international, randomized trial" Watch here: https://t.co/K0MAZPJfbm See article: https://t.co/wRZmLsRa0R
    view full post

    November 13, 2024

    3

  • Endoscopy Journal
    @endoscopyjrnl (Twitter)

    Editor's Choice: Multicenter trial on CADe in everyday colonoscopy populations Find the article at: https://t.co/wRZmLsRHQp Michiel H. J. Maas et al. https://t.co/Vo95n79g3Q
    view full post

    November 12, 2024

  • Dr Celestino Gutiérrez González MD
    @CelestinoGutirr (Twitter)

    RT @KralJan:
    view full post

    November 2, 2024

    1

  • Jan Král
    @KralJan (Twitter)


    view full post

    November 2, 2024

    10

    1

Abstract Synopsis

  • A computer-aided detection (CADe) system was tested in a large, multi-center international study to see if it improves the detection of adenomas and other lesions during colonoscopy.
  • The study found that while CADe slightly increased the detection of sessile serrated lesions, it did not significantly improve the overall adenoma detection rate compared to conventional colonoscopy when performed by experienced endoscopists.
  • The high baseline detection rates in the control group suggest that the effectiveness of CADe might vary depending on the skill of the endoscopists, and the study's results could be affected by being underpowered due to unexpectedly high detection rates in the control group.