Review of the Ticagrelor Trials Evidence Base.
Mentions
Extended reach
Total likes
Video views
Mentions per month
May 2024 – Jul 2025Where it's discussed
-
X / Twitter29 posts
-
Facebook3 posts
-
News3 articles
-
YouTube2 videos
AI synopsis
What people are saying
Several comments highlight the extensive and conflicting nature of the evidence base on ticagrelor, such as references to comprehensive clinical trials and citations of contrarian views. Tone varies from neutral acknowledgment to slight enthusiasm, with phrases like 'nice to see' and mentions of citations indicating recognition but not deep engagement. This suggests a moderate overall perception of importance and interest, centered on the review's scope rather than its conclusions.
The discussions are mixed, with some recognizing the breadth of research but also pointing to conflicting data, indicating neither full endorsement nor outright disagreement.
People show modest interest, reflected in comments that acknowledge the review’s comprehensiveness and mention citations, but without deep analysis.
The engagement appears surface-level, with mentions of the article and some appreciation for citations or the review's scope, rather than detailed critique or exploration.
Overall, the social discussions suggest a moderate perception of impact—awareness exists, but there's no strong indication that these posts view the review as transformative or highly influential.
Abstract in brief
- Ticagrelor is a widely used medication for preventing blood clots in patients with conditions like acute coronary syndromes, certain strokes, and transient ischemic attacks, with clinical trials showing its safety and effectiveness.
- The review compares the results of major trials involving ticagrelor, clopidogrel, and prasugrel, highlighting how ticagrelor's benefits vary depending on patient characteristics, treatment duration, and specific medical indications.
- The purpose of the review is to organize the extensive research on ticagrelor, identify areas where data agrees or conflicts, and pinpoint gaps that need further investigation to optimize antiplatelet therapy.]
Top posts
Most liked on X and BlueskyThe ticagrelor evidence base is large, growing, and conflicting. This #AHAJournals #Review summarizes the major clinical trials data. https://t.co/SMMf0x6trf https://t.co/kJ4vt93Brf
Nice to see that "our contrarian view" has been cited in this article : Review of the #Ticagrelor Trials Evidence Base | Journal of the American Heart Association https://t.co/GqtzjAjefi
Review of the Ticagrelor Trials Evidence Base | Journal of the American Heart Association https://t.co/OyVAzt1EMY
RT @ZHeart11768530:
RT @SABOURETCardio: Nice to see that "our contrarian view" has been cited in this article : Review of the #Ticagrelor Trials Evidence Base…
All mentions
Clopidogrel vs. Aspirin: Insights from Recent Cardiology Studies
This week, John Mandrola MD discusses the Ticagrelor controversy and new RCTs showing clopidogrel may outperform aspirin in noncardiac surgery. The HOST-EXAM study highlights clopidogrel's effectiveness for long-term…
Evaluation of Ticagrelor Effectiveness and Risks in Heart Disease Treatment
This week's podcast discusses the approval of first-generation devices, the ticagrelor controversy, ICD longevity, and the PRAGUE25 trial, one of the most significant studies of the year, along with thoughts on the…
RT @JAHA_AHA: The ticagrelor evidence base is large, growing, and conflicting. This #AHAJournals #Review summarizes the major clinical tria…
The ticagrelor evidence base is large, growing, and conflicting. This #AHAJournals #Review summarizes the major clinical trials data. https://t.co/SMMf0x6trf https://t.co/kJ4vt93Brf
RT @ZHeart11768530:
RT @ZHeart11768530:
RT @ZHeart11768530:
RT @drrkhyd: Review of the Ticagrelor Trials Evidence Base | Journal of the American Heart Association https://t.co/OyVAzt1EMY
RT @ZHeart11768530:
RT @ZHeart11768530:
RT @ZHeart11768530:
RT @ZHeart11768530:
RT @ZHeart11768530:
Review of the Ticagrelor Trials Evidence Base | Journal of the American Heart Association https://t.co/OyVAzt1EMY
RT @ZHeart11768530:
RT @ZHeart11768530:
RT @ZHeart11768530:
RT @ZHeart11768530:
RT @ZHeart11768530:
RT @ZHeart11768530:
RT @ZHeart11768530:
RT @ZHeart11768530:
RT @ZHeart11768530:
RT @ZHeart11768530:
RT @ZHeart11768530:
RT @ZHeart11768530:
RT @ZHeart11768530:
RT @SABOURETCardio: Nice to see that "our contrarian view" has been cited in this article : Review of the #Ticagrelor Trials Evidence Base…
RT @SABOURETCardio: Nice to see that "our contrarian view" has been cited in this article : Review of the #Ticagrelor Trials Evidence Base…
Nice to see that "our contrarian view" has been cited in this article : Review of the #Ticagrelor Trials Evidence Base | Journal of the American Heart Association https://t.co/GqtzjAjefi