Mentions
Extended reach
Total likes
Video views
AI synopsis
Numerous posts reference the Cass report's methodological issues, with phrases such as 'deeply flawed' and 'widely debunked' commonly appearing. The tone of urgency is evident in statements highlighting the report as 'politically motivated junk science' and concerns raised by medical associations, illustrating a collective recognition of its damaging potential to healthcare for trans individuals. For example, the expression of 'having its credibility ruined' emphasizes the strong conviction among users regarding the gravity of the report's flaws.
The majority of discussions express strong alignment with the critical analysis of the Cass report, highlighting its methodological flaws and biases.
Participants show high curiosity about the implications of the report, as they are actively discussing critiques and sharing additional resources.
Many posts demonstrate deep engagement with the article by referring to specific critiques, sharing peer-reviewed sources, and debating the validity of the findings.
There is a consensus among users that the discussion has significant repercussions for the treatment of gender diverse youth and the ongoing discourse surrounding trans rights.
Peer-reviewed research finds the CASS Article is at best a biased argumentative essay, but it has been incorrectly interpreted by the deer's in the headlights as a scientific review, with severe impacts on the ongoing health care for trans people. https://t.co/WYr9yk0hNF
I do not know if this will have any impact, but I have got to put my anger towards something practical so this is what I have written to my MP Feel free to copy (check alt text) and improve. The list of critiques comes from the @transactualuk.bsky.social transactual.org.uk/advocacy/cri...
New research just published: Critically appraising the cass report: methodological flaws and unsupported claims bmcmedresmethodol.biomedcentral.com/articles/10....
Critical appraisal picking apart the Cass Review is now available as a pre-print, via Alex Ashman on Twitter. Critically Appraising the Cass Report: Methodological Flaws and Unsupported Claims: osf.io/preprints/os...
Critically appraising the cass report: methodological flaws and unsupported claims bmcmedresmethodol.bi... #transgender #trans #LGBTQ #LGBTQIA
Critically appraising the cass report: methodological flaws and unsupported claims. link.springer.com/article/10.1...
The Cass Review aimed to provide guidelines for gender diverse youth services in England. However, critical evaluations reveal significant methodological flaws and biases, raising concerns about the credibility of its…
This video critiques the Cass Review, which aimed to develop guidelines for gender diverse youth in England. It reveals significant methodological flaws and inconsistencies in the primary research, questioning the…
This video addresses Jean-François Lisée's statements on gender and societal issues. It explores gender identity topics, including discussions on gender dysphoria and related societal attitudes, supported by various…
This video critically evaluates the Cass Review, which aimed to provide guidelines for gender diverse youth in England. It reveals significant methodological flaws and unsubstantiated claims, raising concerns about the…
Practical conversion therapies must be illegal and punished. The Cass Review aimed to provide guidelines for gender diverse youth, but significant methodological flaws call into question its credibility. This video…
@KAOS8688 @JamesOnekaka @goodfoodgal Yeah, I've seen the cass review. https://t.co/OQVx5Z0nnC
@BlamKaboom @NilsFleischer63 @AlexBerenson https://t.co/AxM7JY2GNQ
@BlamKaboom @NilsFleischer63 @AlexBerenson https://t.co/2PBm0v922i
@NoRedText @KweenInYellow Oh you mean the hotly contested report that was incredibly biased and ignored evidence from clinicians and transpeople themselves? https://t.co/YdYx826h7l https://t.co/SpQZKeUDo3
@grok @ExxAlerts @elonmusk Some clinicians? The British Medical Association is so concerned that they're undertaking a full review. And there's this: https://t.co/qoh4fiAycu
@DoomedPoor @MForstater Womp womp. @DoomedPoor I'm just going to tag you in this link that shows the Cass Report is stupid so that it's linked to your name. https://t.co/syJCvDQjUI
@hollowood_zoe @TonyGoldSE @LibDems So you're another ignorant pompous p.... that wants to torment and abuse kids with conversion therapy then. Based on a deeply flawed shown to be nonsense CASS review. Is no excuse, your ignorance in advocating torment and abuse of kids. https://t.co/dhk9csNFWa
@grok https://t.co/iBarIvsuwx
@grok https://t.co/iBarIvsuwx
@grok @GrokUser1007 @AndrewZywiecMD First, the authors of the Cass Review are not independent experts. Independence implies a lack of ideological bias, which certainly does not apply to Dr. Cass. https://t.co/iBarIvsuwx
@xandymccurdy @MattRxgan @lgbtiqa_greens Cass review been debunked numerous times. Just advocates torment and abuse via conversion therapy. Is a set up linked to Desantos and religious nuts in USA https://t.co/fryYeHpnPO Below is peer reviewed https://t.co/dhk9csNFWa https://t.co/7oqwtoRE36 https://t.co/iMe1wFnd9o
@berkswell @PinkNews BMC found high risk of bias in all seven of the systematic reviews the Cass Review commissioned, citing unexplained protocol deviations and failures to integrate limitations into conclusions. It's debunked. https://t.co/Wi34jbVrJT
@latsot You think you'd have read at least one of the peer-reviewed papers critiquing the Cass Report (which was not peer reviewed itself), seeing as your such an "expert". Here's one for you to enjoy. https://t.co/J55t5jn6iA
@yrysbryd @latsot @kittywoodoshea @SocialistSauce @EdwinWine1 @ghostoftoast @DianeCarolRoy1 @hasitcometothat @EffinMaggie @Catfan2506 @nbrink77 @TheGoldenMask5 @bluebirdjam @h_alliekat @Purplewykr @coolaunt2021 @RadFemme74 @FMccreigh5740 @cecinestpaspipe @Dorasalter @tymprqv7r9 @cptmbf @Qyilldrisstessa @StitchingSin @brenda_archer @ZeldaLazar @DerpyErika @g_akablacksquid @vanessa_blk @Hereticalturf @grok @CloverSevenLeaf @Ronwil19 @Lucifer_mortala @JLippinstan @IAmBadWolf717 @MollyMa57459943 @GenCritThink @Makoto_Says @edbluebean @toleratefreedom @GayLikeKagami @ThatsMadeMyDay @butch2aT @TransPExp @ItsColinTheCMan @BarryTizer @RawMilkAbbo @fletcherkathy8 @statsforgender Here ya go Latsy…. start here… https://t.co/TUuiGglAm4
@xandymccurdy @Theleftorwright @MountainMcRae @madshaz72 @PhilParkinson2 I mean, we do not need to cope https://t.co/EazvzWvaOx.
@EvriDayLife @xandymccurdy @IndiaWilloughby A flawed review made by someone picked to deliver the outcome terfs wanted not a review for a fair and balanced outcome Go check for yourself https://t.co/o5Hth9tboQ
@cindylynn_ The Cassandra report that was exposed as being driven by bigots and ideologues. And been widely debunked by actual experts. https://t.co/a6oBsqbJsz
@Garybro82547780 @teomanonline_ https://t.co/JnpO4IAP5m https://t.co/KafpBruZy8 https://t.co/3OEF6SDjKT https://t.co/3KPTpfTXJe https://t.co/dnL7skwI6w https://t.co/LKEIqSjWoW
@jamieandrews @jimthegiant The Cass review has been roundly deconstructed. This is what i’m talking about. We’re taking the ‘gotcha’s’ from a loud and well-funded lobby and treating it as the starting point of a debate. https://t.co/6U96WUOYGG
@MPMacLachlan https://t.co/fSAvTDBRgg curious about your opinion on this rather new article
@SoltarsEngel @tah_tut_tah @Elijaprvt @KoelnerHamster https://t.co/hqPDgCVsxw.
As no one else appears to have posted this; Critically appraising the cass report: methodological flaws and unsupported claims | BMC Medical Research Methodology | Full Text share.google/MDipi8UqpfQa...
RT @IndiaWilloughby: https://t.co/EM4cEpL7c0
@LilBeanDip5012 @Okie_Rancher @Jacob_Frey https://t.co/Vh8CENgxm2
@JonZ07529622 @buckysthoughts Bet you haven't read it. I have, I've also read this; https://t.co/BUFd5A5Hv8
@RichardEdinger @jaxwilldonicely @FredaPeaches @michaelpforan https://t.co/eNrZjcsNGc my dude, you are committing two big fallacies here 1: argumentum ad legum, or assuming that cause something is law its correct. 2: and appeal to authority, cass was wrong and biased.
@jaxwilldonicely @RichardEdinger @FredaPeaches @michaelpforan https://t.co/eNrZjcsNGc here is a link to the debunking.
@paullistman @fernfoils @fantomclaw @AGallagherAlly which has been torn down in the short time it's been published. An Evidence-Based Critique of the Cass Review https://t.co/QaQvGILlqv Critically appraising the cass report: methodological flaws and unsupported claims https://t.co/4H2q6pM3Nx
@forevershallon @SianHerfield You seem to purport that the CASS review is still credible.. how many more reports is it going to take before you give that up? https://t.co/nGlBDdtbPV
@forevershallon @SianHerfield I'm supposedly ideologically captured when the sources you use are SEGM and Realities Last Stand.
@SenseCertain @coaxialcreature @bdi130960 @marywanna99 @PrideInLabour https://t.co/UFWEuSI9bB
@ProfLAppleby Let me guess are you relying on 'CASS' to justify your abuse of kids. https://t.co/dhk9csNFWa https://t.co/dInI17P4oc
@reach4taskyler Take your pick https://t.co/4sb02mxxRh
@polarbear1066 @oolon @DaviaFinch https://t.co/JnpO4IAhfO https://t.co/KafpBrurIA https://t.co/3OEF6SCLVl https://t.co/3KPTpfTpTG https://t.co/dnL7skwagY
@BenteRaatz @SofieMosgaard Jeg tror desværre at faktum er, at du ikke er interesseret i at lære noget nyt om transpersoner, Bente. Så knap så overrasket. Det er en undersøgelse af Cass-rapporten, Bente. Det jeg linkede til var abstract udgaven. Du kan læse hele undersøgelsen her: https://t.co/zK3xlpkwti
@BenteRaatz @SofieMosgaard Den anerkender transpersoner og behandlingen for disse? Den sætter spørgsmålstegn ved punkter i forhold til hvor tidligt behandlingen skal starte. Men den er ikke imod behandlingen. Udover det, så er den fyldt med tvivlsom bias og mangler i dets metoder https://t.co/9thi61dBOs
@JonjoBamjo @mgtruth @BeattieDoug Her qualifications matter, and she was never qualified to treat trans patients She deliberately excluded qualified people from her report in order to achieve the Tory aims of the enquiry It's a rag of a report https://t.co/uOXo2ulZC5
@dubsteron @70hostess @LGBwiththeT LolCass? You mean that lolcow who has been proven wrong multiple times by multiple different scientific organizations? Sorry she was debunked. https://t.co/eNrZjcsNGc
@Ken_J_Murray @ociongac @PaulDoherty___ Here you go xxx https://t.co/uOxYPIl0EJ
@SenseCertain @JennyLe43000971 @Missmbl2812 So your source is a literal Gender Critical that uses the Cass Review as a reference. The review that btw is getting increasingly destroyed in more peer examinations, but that gotten papers pointing out its flaws that are actually peer reviewed? https://t.co/KyMD76qSJc https://t.co/ydQDIT7UEi
@thesedaysisit @DerpasaurusWrex @ThomasWillett9 According to whose own reports? The cass review has been discredited multiple times. I cited what conversion therapy is. No that is not conversion therapy nor what happens in most cases. https://t.co/drkDpsMV9Y https://t.co/s3jlscGI6V
@BrianKe06876393 @egapnala65 @BarryLedgister @Glinner If you cared about truth you wouldn't be evading this... Or am I being unfair because you can't read past the first paragraph of most texts? https://t.co/3vI61XwAts
@BrianKe06876393 @egapnala65 @BarryLedgister @Glinner So it's all about winning for you, nothing to do with scientific truth or what the evidence shows? I see that explains a lot. Is that why you won't read the PEER REVIWED critique? https://t.co/3vI61XwAts
@BrianKe06876393 @egapnala65 @BarryLedgister @Glinner You can read what this PEER REVIEWED one says right now, which you ignored. We know you struggle reading past the first sentence, or understanding anything beyond that, but give it the old college try... https://t.co/3vI61XwAts
@BrianKe06876393 @egapnala65 @BarryLedgister @Glinner Yeah sure, that imaginary reckoning that's coming, with no scientific basis at all. Would you like some PEER REVIEWED critiques of the NOT PEER REVIWED Cass review that reject it - be warned - it continues after the first sentence: https://t.co/3vI61XwAts
RT @KirstiMiller30: Peer-reviewed research finds the CASS Article is at best a biased argumentative essay, but it has been incorrectly inte…
RT @KirstiMiller30: Peer-reviewed research finds the CASS Article is at best a biased argumentative essay, but it has been incorrectly inte…
RT @KirstiMiller30: Peer-reviewed research finds the CASS Article is at best a biased argumentative essay, but it has been incorrectly inte…
RT @KirstiMiller30: Peer-reviewed research finds the CASS Article is at best a biased argumentative essay, but it has been incorrectly inte…
RT @KirstiMiller30: Peer-reviewed research finds the CASS Article is at best a biased argumentative essay, but it has been incorrectly inte…
RT @KirstiMiller30: Peer-reviewed research finds the CASS Article is at best a biased argumentative essay, but it has been incorrectly inte…
RT @KirstiMiller30: Peer-reviewed research finds the CASS Article is at best a biased argumentative essay, but it has been incorrectly inte…
RT @KirstiMiller30: Peer-reviewed research finds the CASS Article is at best a biased argumentative essay, but it has been incorrectly inte…
RT @KirstiMiller30: Peer-reviewed research finds the CASS Article is at best a biased argumentative essay, but it has been incorrectly inte…
RT @KirstiMiller30: Peer-reviewed research finds the CASS Article is at best a biased argumentative essay, but it has been incorrectly inte…
RT @KirstiMiller30: Peer-reviewed research finds the CASS Article is at best a biased argumentative essay, but it has been incorrectly inte…
RT @KirstiMiller30: Peer-reviewed research finds the CASS Article is at best a biased argumentative essay, but it has been incorrectly inte…
RT @KirstiMiller30: Peer-reviewed research finds the CASS Article is at best a biased argumentative essay, but it has been incorrectly inte…
RT @KirstiMiller30: Peer-reviewed research finds the CASS Article is at best a biased argumentative essay, but it has been incorrectly inte…
RT @KirstiMiller30: Peer-reviewed research finds the CASS Article is at best a biased argumentative essay, but it has been incorrectly inte…
RT @KirstiMiller30: Peer-reviewed research finds the CASS Article is at best a biased argumentative essay, but it has been incorrectly inte…
RT @KirstiMiller30: Peer-reviewed research finds the CASS Article is at best a biased argumentative essay, but it has been incorrectly inte…
RT @KirstiMiller30: Peer-reviewed research finds the CASS Article is at best a biased argumentative essay, but it has been incorrectly inte…
RT @KirstiMiller30: Peer-reviewed research finds the CASS Article is at best a biased argumentative essay, but it has been incorrectly inte…
RT @KirstiMiller30: Peer-reviewed research finds the CASS Article is at best a biased argumentative essay, but it has been incorrectly inte…
RT @KirstiMiller30: Peer-reviewed research finds the CASS Article is at best a biased argumentative essay, but it has been incorrectly inte…
RT @KirstiMiller30: Peer-reviewed research finds the CASS Article is at best a biased argumentative essay, but it has been incorrectly inte…
RT @KirstiMiller30: Peer-reviewed research finds the CASS Article is at best a biased argumentative essay, but it has been incorrectly inte…
RT @KirstiMiller30: Peer-reviewed research finds the CASS Article is at best a biased argumentative essay, but it has been incorrectly inte…
RT @KirstiMiller30: Peer-reviewed research finds the CASS Article is at best a biased argumentative essay, but it has been incorrectly inte…
RT @KirstiMiller30: Peer-reviewed research finds the CASS Article is at best a biased argumentative essay, but it has been incorrectly inte…
RT @KirstiMiller30: Peer-reviewed research finds the CASS Article is at best a biased argumentative essay, but it has been incorrectly inte…
RT @KirstiMiller30: Peer-reviewed research finds the CASS Article is at best a biased argumentative essay, but it has been incorrectly inte…
RT @KirstiMiller30: Peer-reviewed research finds the CASS Article is at best a biased argumentative essay, but it has been incorrectly inte…
RT @KirstiMiller30: Peer-reviewed research finds the CASS Article is at best a biased argumentative essay, but it has been incorrectly inte…
RT @KirstiMiller30: Peer-reviewed research finds the CASS Article is at best a biased argumentative essay, but it has been incorrectly inte…
RT @KirstiMiller30: Peer-reviewed research finds the CASS Article is at best a biased argumentative essay, but it has been incorrectly inte…
RT @KirstiMiller30: Peer-reviewed research finds the CASS Article is at best a biased argumentative essay, but it has been incorrectly inte…
RT @KirstiMiller30: Peer-reviewed research finds the CASS Article is at best a biased argumentative essay, but it has been incorrectly inte…
RT @KirstiMiller30: Peer-reviewed research finds the CASS Article is at best a biased argumentative essay, but it has been incorrectly inte…
RT @KirstiMiller30: Peer-reviewed research finds the CASS Article is at best a biased argumentative essay, but it has been incorrectly inte…
RT @KirstiMiller30: Peer-reviewed research finds the CASS Article is at best a biased argumentative essay, but it has been incorrectly inte…
RT @KirstiMiller30: Peer-reviewed research finds the CASS Article is at best a biased argumentative essay, but it has been incorrectly inte…
RT @KirstiMiller30: Peer-reviewed research finds the CASS Article is at best a biased argumentative essay, but it has been incorrectly inte…
RT @KirstiMiller30: Peer-reviewed research finds the CASS Article is at best a biased argumentative essay, but it has been incorrectly inte…
Peer-reviewed research finds the CASS Article is at best a biased argumentative essay, but it has been incorrectly interpreted by the deer's in the headlights as a scientific review, with severe impacts on the ongoing health care for trans people. https://t.co/WYr9yk0hNF
https://t.co/G2kzeiBNEK
@BenGunnEx @Brig_333 @heatherthefair @nyaraVT https://t.co/DyZlfSWSx9 Mhmmmm
RT @ffenics: @brenda_archer @Makoto_Says @MollyMa57459943 @Rosehunnyheart @Gem_bem31 @BobWhencer @Lucifer_mortala @maybe_ellen @ManMeridian…
@brenda_archer @Makoto_Says @MollyMa57459943 @Rosehunnyheart @Gem_bem31 @BobWhencer @Lucifer_mortala @maybe_ellen @ManMeridian88 @Dorasalter @bluebirdjam @CatherineB22827 @_celia_bedelia_ https://t.co/TUuiGglAm4
@bluebirdjam @dabberoo1495 @_celia_bedelia_ I already provided evidence of it being true, but here's some more Cass report debunking https://t.co/6R0IkHi4mz https://t.co/NFesm1hjSJ Wpath debunking https://t.co/qf4llKu8R3 https://t.co/Zkzu6ZXizx
@Focusscience1 @ArmandGirbes @Rosabloesem En als liever kritiek leest die in een journal is gepubliceerd gepubliceerd: https://t.co/1AQgGJfNil
@lgballiance_aus They're using a fairly debunked at this point review by the infamous Cass... https://t.co/51jqnaWbMq
@RachelWilde13 @TonyGoldSE @tonyvaughanMP https://t.co/BErccn1oeD The Cass review is at best an idiots attempt at becoming famous, at worst a direct attack towards trans people.
@RetrogradeAgain @Lucifer_mortala @SilencedButHere @BlackheartSora @WYR_EXE 3rd the “study” argued against the rate of suicidality amongst transgender youth from Justice Alito during the hearing was the cass study, a widely debunked study because it EXCLUDED the people it was talking about (trans) from the research https://t.co/ojg0QfSykC https://t.co/NrRA4msBHe
@CyrusVinci87033 @MikeFellman @mattyglesias @helenlewis The Cass review was deeply flawed, so it’s very ironic that you would reference it here. https://t.co/z5VMjt1yyV Off-label use is very common for many medications. Do you have any sources to suggest that those symptoms are true for gender affirming care?
@ScottishJenbel @DIAGdemocrats @helenlewis Cass Review is very flawed: https://t.co/VqxdIOjURD #Science #CdnPoli #UKPolitics #VoteBlue
@LauraON72 @thespikyclub @DeepHouseBear @Channel4News This group seems to be at war with themselves over accepting the Cass report. Check out actual peer reviews of Cass, including methodology and how they interpreted data. https://t.co/bLH7MbaG5E
@spooniesaurus @JodieMarsh @jk_rowling Oh you mean the Cass review that got completely debunked cause it's prudish garbage science? https://t.co/z7PqH7G0NM
@sonofAbell @ClarqueAllen @_kaylee222 @CALiberal02 @AveryIsAnAlly @AbortionChat Actually what it did was destroy Cass' credibility through significant methodological problems, insufficient statistical rigor, unreliable datasets, claims presented without evidence, and misrepresentation of quotes from primary research participants. https://t.co/fqoLrw53yQ
@adiaidaidiadiad @Mighty_JAK @2026_light @xXKaptainKillXx @nypost @grok https://t.co/jH80EksaHW https://t.co/Cz2EjNsDsk
@BobWhencer @Docstockk https://t.co/aqgtBQkI4T watch it, don't watch it, I don't care, but if you don't you're nothing but a coward <3
@Artofhunger75 https://t.co/3zP6PuKRQZ.
@TezzaLap @JamesEsses lol fuck no. Not even close. Complete demo of the entire paper from top to bottom. https://t.co/nrYis7VjOo Critically appraising the cass report: methodological flaws and unsupported claims | BMC Medical Research Methodology | Full Text Just one.
Oggi abbiamo fatto una live settimanale in un giorno e orario insolito, ma è stata bellissima. Oggi con il dott. Alberto Infante, abbiamo parlato di pratiche di conversione https://t.co/z71SYilMz5 https://t.co/0Zx426Dm7U
@How86917508 @A_Penlordnt @legaltweetz @CantEverDie It should be ignored because it’s politically motivated junk science. https://t.co/JnpO4IAP5m https://t.co/KafpBruZy8 https://t.co/3OEF6SDjKT https://t.co/3KPTpfTXJe https://t.co/dnL7skwI6w
The Cass Review gets shredded by peer review https://t.co/obHL0WNYw9 via @YouTube
The Cass Review gets shredded by peer review youtu.be/sVOvHke1Mcs?...
The Cass Review gets shredded by peer review https://t.co/55hDKmAcKi
Critically appraising the cass report: methodological flaws and unsupported claims. link.springer.com/article/10.1...
RT @Sochli1987: This is a great video! UK peer review of Cass Review completely tears it apart, just as every major medical association has…
#CassReview shredded by yet more peer review. #TransRightsAreHumanRights https://t.co/RBqohSODyO @KatyMontgomerie
Anti-Trans Cass Report DESTROYED By Peer Review https://t.co/aTGbYl3g6d via @YouTube
It’s Julia Hartley Brewer. I clipped it from this. X youtu.be/FXz6XzonM8o?...
The Cass Review gets shredded by peer review https://t.co/pFUoTyRRwQ via @YouTube
#LGBT+ #TERF youtu.be/FXz6XzonM8o?...
youtu.be/FXz6XzonM8o?...
https://t.co/WuC3upZ3Wp
@MLorenzoFS @ParagonReborn @Kaglor1477401 @BevJacksonAuth Here you go Lorenzo
youtu.be/FXz6XzonM8o
https://t.co/kNbh8MwGp1
youtu.be/sVOvHke1Mcs
youtu.be/FXz6XzonM8o Cass is WRONG, Cass FALSIFIED data, Cass A FRAUD.
https://t.co/UGS7dbBGrI
youtu.be/sVOvHke1Mcs Hillary Cass has ruined her reputation and credibility.
RT @Sochli1987: This is a great video! UK peer review of Cass Review completely tears it apart, just as every major medical association has…
This is a great video! UK peer review of Cass Review completely tears it apart, just as every major medical association has. https://t.co/C7WeIY3JDK
RT @feyeleanor: Anti-Trans Cass Report DESTROYED By Peer Review https://t.co/TQJuv7PVys via @YouTube
Anti-Trans Cass Report DESTROYED By Peer Review https://t.co/TQJuv7PVys via @YouTube
https://t.co/M7vuVE2BXJ
youtu.be/sVOvHke1Mcs?...
RT @RoserMcG: https://t.co/n7xMmaFaJB
https://t.co/n7xMmaFaJB
youtu.be/FXz6XzonM8o?...
youtu.be/sVOvHke1Mcs?...
youtu.be/FXz6XzonM8o?...
I will say this over and over again- the British taxpayers’ funding of the Cass Review is one of the biggest boondoggles since Brexit. Here’s a great summary of a peer review… @KatyMontgomerie https://t.co/XvKsvE563Q
The Cass Review gets shredded by peer review https://t.co/Po2Nj10WF8 via @YouTube
youtu.be/sVOvHke1Mcs?...
youtu.be/sVOvHke1Mcs
#LGBT+ #CassReview youtu.be/sVOvHke1Mcs?...
youtu.be/sVOvHke1Mcs?...
@nadiawhittomemp.bsky.social @zarahsultana.bsky.social @sarahowen.org.uk Watch this, read the report and get this cass person banned from working as a doctor. youtu.be/sVOvHke1Mcs?...
youtu.be/FXz6XzonM8o?...
youtu.be/FXz6XzonM8o
https://t.co/4to9QjBCAE
Critically appraising the Cass report: methodological flaws & unsupported claims Almost two dozen researchers at a top medical journal have published a scathing scientific take-down. Experts found that the NHS-issued report--a non-peer reviewed publication authored by Dr. Hillary Cass, a […]
Critically appraising the Cass report: methodological flaws & unsupported claims Top medical journal researchers wrote a scathing scientific take-down, noting "unexplained protocol deviations," "methodological flaws," & "unsubstantiated claims." bmcmedresmethodol.biomedcentral.com/articles/10....
Critically appraising the cass report: methodological flaws and unsupported claims | BMC Medical Research Methodology bmcmedresmethodol.biomedcentral.com/articles/10....
Researchers in UK and USA and Europe have criticised the Cass review. A recent article "Critically appraising the Cass report: methodological flaws and unsupported claims" bmcmedresmethodol.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.... And Yale Integrity Project response to Cass. law.yale.edu/sites/defaul...
Research Spotlight: Critically appraising the Cass report: Methodological flaws and unsupported claims BMC Medical Research Methodology published a critical analysis of the Cass Review, a non-peer-reviewed set of recommendations about gender affirming care for youth to the NHS England. Since […]
Research Spotlight: Critically appraising the Cass report: Methodological flaws and unsupported claims BMC Medical Research Methodology published a critical analysis of the Cass Review, a non-peer-reviewed set of recommendations about gender affirming care for youth to the NHS England. Since its…
Research Spotlight: Critically appraising the Cass report: Methodological flaws and unsupported claims BMC Medical Research Methodology published a critical analysis of the Cass Review, a non-peer-reviewed set of recommendations about gender affirming care for youth to the NHS England. Since its…
Transphobic lies are the falsehoods spread by TERFs and their right wing benefactors, upon which anti-trans media narratives are spun, and far right policies are adopted by duplicitous politicians seeking to obscure their fascism. #TransphobicLies #Transphobia #TransRightsAreHumanRights
New research just published: Critically appraising the cass report: methodological flaws and unsupported claims bmcmedresmethodol.biomedcentral.com/articles/10....
RT @57to6262: 昨年6月にプレプリントが公開されて以来長らく待ち望まれていた論文がとうとうジャーナルに掲載されました。キャス報告書批判の論文として査読済みのみのものは3本目かな。 オープンアクセスに感謝です。 https://t.co/RHJMsWiOi4
昨年6月にプレプリントが公開されて以来長らく待ち望まれていた論文がとうとうジャーナルに掲載されました。キャス報告書批判の論文として査読済みのみのものは3本目かな。 オープンアクセスに感謝です。 https://t.co/RHJMsWiOi4
Quick but important point - typo in the title: ‘cass’ should read ‘Cass’.
Critically appraising the cass report: methodological flaws and unsupported claims bmcmedresmethodol.bi... #transgender #trans #LGBTQ #LGBTQIA
"Critically appraising the cass report: methodological flaws and unsupported claims", published today, in BMC Medical Research Methodology volume 25:
their interpretations and conclusions" Critically appraising the cass report: methodological flaws and unsupported claims | BMC Medical Research Methodology https://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12874-025-02581-7 #trans #TransKids
Reposted to add #AltText and alt text is altered to add as much information from the image as the character limit allows (taken out: Author’s names, Background, & Keywords) #ProtectTransFolks #TransLivesMatter #TransRightsAreHumanRights
Reposting with alt text. The doi is doi.org/10.1186/s128...
CRITICALLY APPRAISING THE CASS REPORT: METHODOLOGICAL FLAWS AND UNSUPPORTED CLAIMS osf.io/preprints/os...
Critically Appraising the Cass Report: Methodological Flaws and Unsupported Claims ↪️ osf.io/preprints/os...
I do not know if this will have any impact, but I have got to put my anger towards something practical so this is what I have written to my MP Feel free to copy (check alt text) and improve. The list of critiques comes from the @transactualuk.bsky.social transactual.org.uk/advocacy/cri...
There are some great resources in the linked post by @erininthemorning.bsky.social . The BBC included one more on the same story that is also good CRITICALLY APPRAISING THE CASS REPORT: METHODOLOGICAL FLAWS AND UNSUPPORTED CLAIMS osf.io/preprints/os...
This is a really excellent article that details what rubbish the Cass Report is, how poorly it’s been done, and how they’ve cherry picked and ignored evidence to make their unsubstantiated claims. Open access here: osf.io/preprints/os...
Critical appraisal picking apart the Cass Review is now available as a pre-print, via Alex Ashman on Twitter. Critically Appraising the Cass Report: Methodological Flaws and Unsupported Claims: osf.io/preprints/os...
Just released as a preprint, here is "CRITICALLY APPRAISING THE CASS REPORT: METHODOLOGICAL FLAWS AND UNSUPPORTED CLAIMS" by multiple authors, which closely examines some of the unsubstantiated claims and unwarranted conclusions that Cass advances
Critically Appraising the Cass Report: Methodological Flaws and Unsupported Claims osf.io/preprints/os...
1/5 CRITICALLY APPRAISING THE CASS REPORT: METHODOLOGICAL FLAWS AND UNSUPPORTED CLAIMS osf.io/preprints/os... #cass #uk #transphobia #transrights #terfisland #lgbtqia
CRITICALLY APPRAISING THE CASS REPORT: METHODOLOGICAL FLAWS AND UNSUPPORTED CLAIMS osf.io/preprints/os...