The overall reactions show strong interest in the biomechanical findings, with comments emphasizing practical applications like building hip muscles through low-bar squats and citing the relevance for specific lifts like snatch and clean. The tone balances technical understanding and training relevance, contributing to moderate engagement and perceived impact.
AgreementModerate agreement
Most discussions recognize the validity of the research findings, with some posts highlighting the biomechanical differences and practical applications of the squats.
InterestHigh interest
Posts demonstrate a high level of interest, especially in benefits for weightlifting and muscle targeting, as seen in comments about emphasizing hip muscles and fitness implications.
EngagementModerate engagement
Several contributions delve into implications, such as comparing the suitability of each squat style for different lifts, indicating thoughtful engagement.
ImpactModerate impact
The discussions reflect awareness of how this research influences training choices, though there's no indication of widespread controversy or transformative impact yet.
Abstract in brief
The study compares the biomechanics of highbar backsquat (HBBS) and lowbar backsquat (LBBS) in terms of joint angles and ground reaction forces, analyzing differences in various groups including powerlifters, Olympic weightlifters, and recreational athletes.
Results showed small to moderate differences between groups, with significant variations in joint angles between experienced lifters and recreational athletes, though no statistically significant differences were found between the different squat styles at high intensities.
The findings suggest that LBBS may be better for targeting hip muscles and lifting heavier loads, while HBBS is more appropriate for replicating upright torso movements seen in Olympic lifts and emphasizing knee joint musculature.]
Oct 8, 2020 · 126 likes · 16 shares · 14,696 followersView post →
AL
Andrés Logroño
@AndrsLogrono · X
Interesante estudio:
Sentadilla con barra baja para levantar mas peso y dar énfasis a la musculatura de la cadera (glúteos)
Sentadilla con barra baja alta énfasis en musculatura de la rodilla (cuádriceps) y torso mas erguido, Ideal para snatch y clean https://t.co/u0YlUq5QU0
Oct 20, 2021 · 5 likes · 2 shares · 1,323 followersView post →
ｶ脳
ｶﾞｯﾂ角刈りｷﾞｬﾙ(脳筋)
@sogachin2 · X
The High-Bar and Low-Bar Back-Squats: A Biomechanical... : The Journal of Strength https://t.co/oMhW2QZjY0
Dec 22, 2019 · 1 like · 4,638 followersView post →
This video explores differences between high bar, low bar, and front squats, focusing on bar placement, biomechanics, and muscle engagement. Front squats may reduce knee joint stress while maintaining effective muscle…
This project explores progression in strength training, focusing on proper breathing, bracing, and compound movements, supported by literature review. It combines academic research and practical application to promote…
@JooVictorAlvar3 @_Xfour_ @pivetemaromba Glassbrook, Daniel J.1; Brown, Scott R.1; Helms, Eric R.1; Duncan, Scott1; Storey, Adam G.1,2. The High-Bar and Low-Bar Back-Squats: A Biomechanical Analysis. Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research 33():p S1-S18, July 2019. | DOI: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000001836
Interesante estudio:
Sentadilla con barra baja para levantar mas peso y dar énfasis a la musculatura de la cadera (glúteos)
Sentadilla con barra baja alta énfasis en musculatura de la rodilla (cuádriceps) y torso mas erguido, Ideal para snatch y clean https://t.co/u0YlUq5QU0
Oct 20, 2021 · 5 likes · 2 shares · 1,323 followersView post →
doi: 10.1519/JSC. 0000000000001836. PMID: 28195975 Glassbrook DJ, Helms ER, Brown SR, Storey AG (2017) Review of the Biomechanical Differences Between the ...
西N
AL
ｶ脳
中N
PU
T
IA
M
SG
悠
し
ル
中望
T
ま豪
L