Mentions
Extended reach
Total likes
Video views
AI synopsis
The discussions explicitly state that the h-index is no longer a reliable indicator, with examples mentioning its poor correlation with prestigious awards and highlighting the importance of alternative metrics like fractional h-indices. The tone is analytical and critical, emphasizing the need for evolving evaluation standards in scientific communities.
Most discussions agree that the traditional h-index is becoming less effective as a measure of scientific reputation, with numerous mentions of declining correlation with awards and recognition.
The repeated references to alternative metrics like 'h-frac' and discussions of impact factor and authorship patterns show high curiosity and concern about evaluation methods in science.
Participants deeply analyze the implications of the article, referencing concepts like Goodhart's law, fractional contributions, and the changing nature of authorship, indicating thorough engagement.
The widespread agreement and detailed discussions suggest this article could influence ongoing debates and future practices in assessing scientific performance.
The h-index is no longer an effective correlate of scientific reputation https://t.co/N8knm9Ta5X
Goodhart yasası: Gösterge hedef haline gelirse iyi bir gösterge olmaktan çıkar. Mesela akademisyenler yayın kalitelerini göstermek için h-index'lerini yükseltmeye yönelik yayın yapmaya başlarlarsa h-index kaliteli yayın göstergesi olmaktan çıkar. https://t.co/ZshJqfblsE
The h-index is no longer an effective correlate of scientific reputation: "correlation of the h-index with awards that indicate recognition by the scientific community has substantially declined. These trends are associated w changing authorship patterns" https://t.co/DfaQzREwd8
Not a big surprise here. I am always skeptical when I see efforts to evaluate scientific output or impact based on purely quantitative metrics. Please don’t hire or promote faculty simply based on such metrics!! https://t.co/yyNZoLwY3g
@stkirsch @neiltyson Indeed, there have been a number of studies have suggested that the h-index is no longer a good correlate of scientific reputation; e.g., this one... https://t.co/e4arJ6UtnO
Nice new paper by @intel researchers "The h-index is no longer an effective correlate of scientific reputation" https://t.co/aCfPD7WK24
This video reviews the decreasing effectiveness of the h-index as a measure of scientific reputation, highlighting the impact of changing authorship practices and exploring the potential of fractional measures like…
The H-Index measures a scientist's research impact, but its effectiveness is declining. This video briefly explores its evolution, limitations, and how fractional citation measures like hfrac may provide better…
RT @CSProfKGD: Vladlen Koltun, David Hafner The h-index is no longer an effective correlate of scientific reputation, arXiv, 2021 arXiv: h…
@menhguin https://t.co/BfdN570q3j
@ktibus @VeritasEver Here's one about elite bias: https://t.co/RXICmtXnN3 Here's one about h-index bias: https://t.co/GmZu5xV7jm How impact factor rewards fecundity over quality: https://t.co/DMEHqzSBMU
@srush_nlp I thought this paper on the topic was interesting when I read it a few years ago https://t.co/y4MLWoBNB7
RT @InsanEvrim: Goodhart yasası: Gösterge hedef haline gelirse iyi bir gösterge olmaktan çıkar. Mesela akademisyenler yayın kalitelerini g…
Goodhart yasası: Gösterge hedef haline gelirse iyi bir gösterge olmaktan çıkar. Mesela akademisyenler yayın kalitelerini göstermek için h-index'lerini yükseltmeye yönelik yayın yapmaya başlarlarsa h-index kaliteli yayın göstergesi olmaktan çıkar. https://t.co/ZshJqfblsE
We look at researchers’ CV to judge productivity, and use it in hiring, promotion, and funding. But how well the past predicts the future? H-Index, common measure is ‘no longer effective correlate of scientific reputation’ says research https://t.co/IQHwYx87Lh https://t.co/R4O7v9QCZI
We look at researchers’ CV to judge productivity, and use it in hiring, promotion, and funding. But how well the past predicts the future? H-Index, common measure is ‘no longer effective correlate of scientific reputation’ says research https://t.co/IQHwYx87Lh https://t.co/50k2kvLovD
We look at researchers’ CV to judge productivity, and use it in hiring, promotion, and funding. But how well the past predicts the future? H-Index, common measure is ‘no longer effective correlate of scientific reputation’ says research https://t.co/QMLljNI0HJ https://t.co/dq4mRqU5JQ
We look at researchers’ CV to judge productivity, and use it in hiring, promotion, and funding. But how well the past predicts the future? H-Index, common measure is ‘no longer effective correlate of scientific reputation’ says research https://t.co/IQHwYx87Lh https://t.co/ygYl2x2gH7
We look at researchers’ CV to judge productivity, and use it in hiring, promotion, and funding. But how well the past predicts the future? H-Index, common measure is ‘no longer effective correlate of scientific reputation’ says research https://t.co/QMLljNI0HJ https://t.co/9Afol8Cinq
We look at researchers’ CV to judge productivity, and use it in hiring, promotion, and funding. But how well the past predicts the future? H-Index, common measure is ‘no longer effective correlate of scientific reputation’ says research https://t.co/IQHwYx87Lh https://t.co/JkK0anxIPB
@thomaswoodcock By that logic I'd be looking at an associate professorship as an ST5 trainee. Ha! Arguably, the h-index needs to be reconsidered as a metric to chase. https://t.co/GyFKIgWgaU
@Jeff_mc2 @dr_jon_l Derp. Deflection. H index is irrelevant. https://t.co/CQBkJshioz
@stkirsch @thereal_truther @EdKrassen @RichardWWard1 Your h index is irrelevant . https://t.co/CQBkJsgKz1
@_jasonwei See “The h-index is no longer an effective correlate of scientific reputation” by Vladlen Koltun and David Hafner https://t.co/wgPQamvH7G.
@Tom60709479 Un peu d'instruction sur le sujet te ferait le plus grand bien
@Titithebest4 @Non_MaisDisDonc @saada_vsaada @LockedFab @gregocapp @OlivierHertel @nicolasberrod @Sonic_urticant @MathieuMolimard @amelie_for_you @EricBillyFR @fluidloading @raoult_didier @IHU_Marseille @helenepalma1972 La qualité ne rentre pas en compte titi. https://t.co/aQ2bOxecLm
RT @gbiondizoccai: I found this paper challenging the Hirsch h-index, concluding 'use of h-index in ranking scientists should be reconsider…
I found this paper challenging the Hirsch h-index, concluding 'use of h-index in ranking scientists should be reconsidered, and fractional allocation measures (eg h-frac) provide more robust alternatives' Do you agree? https://t.co/ayL9wL0ccM https://t.co/kPXJg5PBeQ @PLOSONE
@stkirsch @neiltyson Indeed, there have been a number of studies have suggested that the h-index is no longer a good correlate of scientific reputation; e.g., this one... https://t.co/e4arJ6UtnO
This is an interesting paper: https://t.co/7QGbXeVveX Normalizing citations by number of authors and fractionally allocating the credit reduces the effect of "hyperauthors" and preserves a relationship between impact and index.
@frachanl @Fredilo231 @TroncheBiais https://t.co/VgYEU436zO
@3ibar @nuckynucker @msmarbella @R_H_Ebright The h-index is no longer an effective correlate of scientific reputation https://t.co/WPbMaDlL15
The h-index is a widely used metric for measuring scientific performance & purportedly captures both quality (# of citations) & quantity (# of publications) in a single # that is easily understood. [1/3] #Academic #AcademicExcellence #ScholarlyPublishing https://t.co/70jgDuLBAS https://t.co/fGuwvNcJoo
@candacegranberg @BlFindlay @NCSAUA @HFleakyladies @khkraft A) we need to consider controlling h index for time. Some data suggests it approaches gender equivalence. B) maybe it’s time to get rid of it altogether! https://t.co/32yIsMXyxO
@Mill277 @Die_Kirre @ichbins_OB @EckerleIsabella Zu Ihrem H Faktor gibt es übrigens ein interessantes Paper
@BRex707 @MatthewHartke You might want to read stuff before you post it. "an h-index between 15-20" can get you a fellowship into APS. Are you saying APS fellows are "not" successful? You may also want to read this. https://t.co/9ycEf3oNEp What an amazing self-own.
RT @andrewrypel: Never heard of 'h-frac' as alt to h-index, but not sure that is a suitable replacement either. Interesting to think about…
RT @andrewrypel: Never heard of 'h-frac' as alt to h-index, but not sure that is a suitable replacement either. Interesting to think about…
Never heard of 'h-frac' as alt to h-index, but not sure that is a suitable replacement either. Interesting to think about though & more evidence that h-index can mislead. Possible that reliance on any 1 index that "boils things down to a number" has issues https://t.co/GccZ9SWS8s
@EricMTrautmann @DrYassum I would agree with you, but I’ve seen some people argue for this kind of division by # of authors, like here, where they’re arguing that such a “fractional” h-index is a better metric https://t.co/wWMjdvTLO8 Not great if that becomes an argument to hold back coauthorship…
RT @martin_eve: @ProfHendershot Sorry if you know this already but: Google Scholar uses flawed metrics like h-index. This is the best most…
The h-index is no longer an effective correlate of scientific reputation https://t.co/uBWHz0zaco
@ProfHendershot Sorry if you know this already but: Google Scholar uses flawed metrics like h-index. This is the best most-recent critique of that: https://t.co/UJkzDghRbD More broadly the San Francisco Declaration on Research Assessment (DORA) give some good principles https://t.co/ns5YBTKEzv
RT @pontneuf_pe: ま、むしろプレプリントを量産して全てお互いに引用するようにすれば、自己h indexは簡単に高められる時代。一報プレプリントに出すたびに＋1．投稿して受理されれば、さらに＋1？. https://t.co/U48pIYRi1l
ま、むしろプレプリントを量産して全てお互いに引用するようにすれば、自己h indexは簡単に高められる時代。一報プレプリントに出すたびに＋1．投稿して受理されれば、さらに＋1？. https://t.co/U48pIYRi1l
@Fbl1966 @VikingStudios1 @DocSegundum https://t.co/PqqLPsPamx Vidéo sur le sujet.
https://t.co/bIPebvJmw1
https://t.co/ySTaK8cPtv
H index - YouTube https://t.co/2Z8F50lxZH
@ThomMohr @Climatree @florianaigner So what
RT @krishnanrohit: This is fascinating. Apparently for scientific recognition we need to analyse fractional citations amongst authors, itse…
This is fascinating. Apparently for scientific recognition we need to analyse fractional citations amongst authors, itself an indication of increasing teamwork in science. https://t.co/fnxBId1Li1
@StructuralBiol7 @SabinehazanMD @camontea @alinefortuna2 @MicrobiomDigest Guess you missed the memo. Go troll elsewhere. https://t.co/5PJLmKkCWN
El índice H y la escritura científica https://t.co/YwIIZGSeTk
RT @CSProfKGD: Vladlen Koltun, David Hafner The h-index is no longer an effective correlate of scientific reputation, arXiv, 2021 arXiv: h…
h-indexはもはや研究者の科学的業績とは何の関係もない。 この10年で論文の共著者が増えすぎ。 https://t.co/x8A6KU4U2M
Beware of unintended consequences: the weakest authors (PhD students) will not easily get their names on papers. https://t.co/XBwnTyhvkp
The h-index is no longer an effective correlate of scientific reputation, because authorship patterns changed in the recent years @StavrosZenios @UCYRector5 @pzaphiri https://t.co/syLyFO9mRd
RT @oatp: The h-index is no longer an effective correlate of scientific reputation https://t.co/WJRMucNLz8
RT @oatp: The h-index is no longer an effective correlate of scientific reputation https://t.co/WJRMucNLz8
The h-index is no longer an effective correlate of scientific reputation https://t.co/WJRMucNLz8
RT @KamounLab: H-index is dead. Long lives the h-frac!
Go for good! https://t.co/HP7pM0ekYc
RT @KamounLab: H-index is dead. Long lives the h-frac!
RT @KamounLab: H-index is dead. Long lives the h-frac!
RT @KamounLab: H-index is dead. Long lives the h-frac!
RT @KamounLab: H-index is dead. Long lives the h-frac!
“We find that the correlation of the h-index with awards that indicate recognition by the scientific community has substantially declined” https://t.co/0RS1QCaOm2
RT @KamounLab: H-index is dead. Long lives the h-frac!
RT @KamounLab: H-index is dead. Long lives the h-frac!
Not a big surprise here. I am always skeptical when I see efforts to evaluate scientific output or impact based on purely quantitative metrics. Please don’t hire or promote faculty simply based on such metrics!! https://t.co/yyNZoLwY3g
The h-index is no longer an effective correlate of scientific reputation https://t.co/V4FkdlJxRR
@ffigon "The h-index is no longer an effective correlate of scientific reputation" Never has been...
RT @KamounLab: H-index is dead. Long lives the h-frac!
RT @KamounLab: H-index is dead. Long lives the h-frac!
RT @KamounLab: H-index is dead. Long lives the h-frac!
RT @KamounLab: H-index is dead. Long lives the h-frac!
RT @KamounLab: H-index is dead. Long lives the h-frac!
“The h-index is no longer an effective correlate of scientific reputation”; well, when do we get rid of Journal Impact Factors then?! We are scientist and even tho we don’t use the evidence to promote careers in science
RT @Marek_Kwiek: "Our results suggest that the use of the h-index in ranking scientists should be reconsidered, and that fractional allocat…
RT @aemonten: Was it ever? https://t.co/TwgbnuRXM6
RT @KamounLab: H-index is dead. Long lives the h-frac!
RT @ProfGemmell: Interesting read, but I am not sure many of us ever thought h-index was an effective correlate of scientific reputation. I…
H-index does not correlate with prestigious awards. https://t.co/saRieedowG https://t.co/23h8wPDX7K
Interesting read, but I am not sure many of us ever thought h-index was an effective correlate of scientific reputation. It was sometimes useful, but is a very blunt tool, especially when evaluating candidates working in diverse subject areas. https://t.co/HPwGzcdtDT
RT @KamounLab: H-index is dead. Long lives the h-frac!
RT @KamounLab: H-index is dead. Long lives the h-frac!
RT @KamounLab: H-index is dead. Long lives the h-frac!
RT @KamounLab: H-index is dead. Long lives the h-frac!
RT @KamounLab: H-index is dead. Long lives the h-frac!
RT @aemonten: Was it ever? https://t.co/TwgbnuRXM6
The h-index is no longer an effective correlate of scientific reputation https://t.co/4sMXQH5XFc
RT @KamounLab: H-index is dead. Long lives the h-frac!
RT @KamounLab: H-index is dead. Long lives the h-frac!
The h-index is no longer an effective correlate of scientific reputation https://t.co/RshrKxcDI4
RT @DrRoderickTung: Should publishing within a larger collaboration dilute the value of a single author? Interesting concept of fractional…
Should publishing within a larger collaboration dilute the value of a single author? Interesting concept of fractional allocation. #PLOSONE: The h-index is no longer an effective correlate of scientific reputation https://t.co/5eoaS1zvj5
h-indexの再考 The h-index is no longer an effective correlate of scientific reputation https://t.co/RA2P24miLO
RT @dannykay68: ANALYSIS: "The h-index is no longer an effective correlate of scientific reputation" https://t.co/8aCRaOTPii the correlati…
RT @K_KalantarZadeh: The h-index is no longer an effective correlate of scientific reputation https://t.co/N8knm9Ta5X
RT @K_KalantarZadeh: The h-index is no longer an effective correlate of scientific reputation https://t.co/N8knm9Ta5X
RT @K_KalantarZadeh: The h-index is no longer an effective correlate of scientific reputation https://t.co/N8knm9Ta5X
RT @K_KalantarZadeh: The h-index is no longer an effective correlate of scientific reputation https://t.co/N8knm9Ta5X
RT @K_KalantarZadeh: The h-index is no longer an effective correlate of scientific reputation https://t.co/N8knm9Ta5X
RT @K_KalantarZadeh: The h-index is no longer an effective correlate of scientific reputation https://t.co/N8knm9Ta5X
RT @K_KalantarZadeh: The h-index is no longer an effective correlate of scientific reputation https://t.co/N8knm9Ta5X
RT @K_KalantarZadeh: The h-index is no longer an effective correlate of scientific reputation https://t.co/N8knm9Ta5X
RT @K_KalantarZadeh: The h-index is no longer an effective correlate of scientific reputation https://t.co/N8knm9Ta5X
RT @K_KalantarZadeh: The h-index is no longer an effective correlate of scientific reputation https://t.co/N8knm9Ta5X
RT @K_KalantarZadeh: The h-index is no longer an effective correlate of scientific reputation https://t.co/N8knm9Ta5X
RT @K_KalantarZadeh: The h-index is no longer an effective correlate of scientific reputation https://t.co/N8knm9Ta5X
RT @K_KalantarZadeh: The h-index is no longer an effective correlate of scientific reputation https://t.co/N8knm9Ta5X
RT @K_KalantarZadeh: The h-index is no longer an effective correlate of scientific reputation https://t.co/N8knm9Ta5X
RT @K_KalantarZadeh: The h-index is no longer an effective correlate of scientific reputation https://t.co/N8knm9Ta5X
RT @K_KalantarZadeh: The h-index is no longer an effective correlate of scientific reputation https://t.co/N8knm9Ta5X
RT @K_KalantarZadeh: The h-index is no longer an effective correlate of scientific reputation https://t.co/N8knm9Ta5X
RT @K_KalantarZadeh: The h-index is no longer an effective correlate of scientific reputation https://t.co/N8knm9Ta5X
RT @K_KalantarZadeh: The h-index is no longer an effective correlate of scientific reputation https://t.co/N8knm9Ta5X
RT @K_KalantarZadeh: The h-index is no longer an effective correlate of scientific reputation https://t.co/N8knm9Ta5X
RT @K_KalantarZadeh: The h-index is no longer an effective correlate of scientific reputation https://t.co/N8knm9Ta5X
RT @K_KalantarZadeh: The h-index is no longer an effective correlate of scientific reputation https://t.co/N8knm9Ta5X
RT @K_KalantarZadeh: The h-index is no longer an effective correlate of scientific reputation https://t.co/N8knm9Ta5X
RT @K_KalantarZadeh: The h-index is no longer an effective correlate of scientific reputation https://t.co/N8knm9Ta5X
RT @K_KalantarZadeh: The h-index is no longer an effective correlate of scientific reputation https://t.co/N8knm9Ta5X
RT @K_KalantarZadeh: The h-index is no longer an effective correlate of scientific reputation https://t.co/N8knm9Ta5X
RT @K_KalantarZadeh: The h-index is no longer an effective correlate of scientific reputation https://t.co/N8knm9Ta5X
RT @K_KalantarZadeh: The h-index is no longer an effective correlate of scientific reputation https://t.co/N8knm9Ta5X
RT @K_KalantarZadeh: The h-index is no longer an effective correlate of scientific reputation https://t.co/N8knm9Ta5X
RT @K_KalantarZadeh: The h-index is no longer an effective correlate of scientific reputation https://t.co/N8knm9Ta5X
RT @K_KalantarZadeh: The h-index is no longer an effective correlate of scientific reputation https://t.co/N8knm9Ta5X
RT @K_KalantarZadeh: The h-index is no longer an effective correlate of scientific reputation https://t.co/N8knm9Ta5X
RT @K_KalantarZadeh: The h-index is no longer an effective correlate of scientific reputation https://t.co/N8knm9Ta5X
RT @K_KalantarZadeh: The h-index is no longer an effective correlate of scientific reputation https://t.co/N8knm9Ta5X
RT @K_KalantarZadeh: The h-index is no longer an effective correlate of scientific reputation https://t.co/N8knm9Ta5X
RT @K_KalantarZadeh: The h-index is no longer an effective correlate of scientific reputation https://t.co/N8knm9Ta5X
RT @K_KalantarZadeh: The h-index is no longer an effective correlate of scientific reputation https://t.co/N8knm9Ta5X
RT @K_KalantarZadeh: The h-index is no longer an effective correlate of scientific reputation https://t.co/N8knm9Ta5X
RT @K_KalantarZadeh: The h-index is no longer an effective correlate of scientific reputation https://t.co/N8knm9Ta5X
RT @K_KalantarZadeh: The h-index is no longer an effective correlate of scientific reputation https://t.co/N8knm9Ta5X
RT @K_KalantarZadeh: The h-index is no longer an effective correlate of scientific reputation https://t.co/N8knm9Ta5X
RT @K_KalantarZadeh: The h-index is no longer an effective correlate of scientific reputation https://t.co/N8knm9Ta5X
RT @K_KalantarZadeh: The h-index is no longer an effective correlate of scientific reputation https://t.co/N8knm9Ta5X
RT @K_KalantarZadeh: The h-index is no longer an effective correlate of scientific reputation https://t.co/N8knm9Ta5X
RT @K_KalantarZadeh: The h-index is no longer an effective correlate of scientific reputation https://t.co/N8knm9Ta5X
RT @K_KalantarZadeh: The h-index is no longer an effective correlate of scientific reputation https://t.co/N8knm9Ta5X
The h-index is no longer an effective correlate of scientific reputation https://t.co/N8knm9Ta5X
The h-index is no longer an effective correlate of scientific reputation | EndNote Click https://t.co/hVrGU3ATaz
RT @dannykay68: ANALYSIS: "The h-index is no longer an effective correlate of scientific reputation" https://t.co/8aCRaOTPii the correlati…
RT @dannykay68: ANALYSIS: "The h-index is no longer an effective correlate of scientific reputation" https://t.co/8aCRaOTPii the correlati…
RT @dannykay68: ANALYSIS: "The h-index is no longer an effective correlate of scientific reputation" https://t.co/8aCRaOTPii the correlati…
RT @dannykay68: ANALYSIS: "The h-index is no longer an effective correlate of scientific reputation" https://t.co/8aCRaOTPii the correlati…
RT @dannykay68: ANALYSIS: "The h-index is no longer an effective correlate of scientific reputation" https://t.co/8aCRaOTPii the correlati…
RT @dannykay68: ANALYSIS: "The h-index is no longer an effective correlate of scientific reputation" https://t.co/8aCRaOTPii the correlati…
RT @dannykay68: ANALYSIS: "The h-index is no longer an effective correlate of scientific reputation" https://t.co/8aCRaOTPii the correlati…
RT @dannykay68: ANALYSIS: "The h-index is no longer an effective correlate of scientific reputation" https://t.co/8aCRaOTPii the correlati…
RT @dannykay68: ANALYSIS: "The h-index is no longer an effective correlate of scientific reputation" https://t.co/8aCRaOTPii the correlati…
RT @dannykay68: ANALYSIS: "The h-index is no longer an effective correlate of scientific reputation" https://t.co/8aCRaOTPii the correlati…
RT @dannykay68: ANALYSIS: "The h-index is no longer an effective correlate of scientific reputation" https://t.co/8aCRaOTPii the correlati…
RT @dannykay68: ANALYSIS: "The h-index is no longer an effective correlate of scientific reputation" https://t.co/8aCRaOTPii the correlati…
ANALYSIS: "The h-index is no longer an effective correlate of scientific reputation" https://t.co/8aCRaOTPii the correlation of the h-index with awards that indicate recognition by the scientific community has substantially declined.
The h-index is no longer an effective correlate of scientific reputation https://t.co/1rBnKok8dn https://t.co/yx5J13p1dV
RT @RebeccaSear: The h-index is no longer an effective correlate of scientific reputation: "correlation of the h-index with awards that ind…
RT @RebeccaSear: The h-index is no longer an effective correlate of scientific reputation: "correlation of the h-index with awards that ind…
RT @RebeccaSear: The h-index is no longer an effective correlate of scientific reputation: "correlation of the h-index with awards that ind…
RT @RebeccaSear: The h-index is no longer an effective correlate of scientific reputation: "correlation of the h-index with awards that ind…
RT @RebeccaSear: The h-index is no longer an effective correlate of scientific reputation: "correlation of the h-index with awards that ind…
The h-index is no longer an effective correlate of scientific reputation: "correlation of the h-index with awards that indicate recognition by the scientific community has substantially declined. These trends are associated w changing authorship patterns" https://t.co/DfaQzREwd8
RT @ghillardi: Nice new paper by @intel researchers "The h-index is no longer an effective correlate of scientific reputation" https://t.…
RT @ghillardi: Nice new paper by @intel researchers "The h-index is no longer an effective correlate of scientific reputation" https://t.…
RT @ghillardi: Nice new paper by @intel researchers "The h-index is no longer an effective correlate of scientific reputation" https://t.…
RT @ghillardi: Nice new paper by @intel researchers "The h-index is no longer an effective correlate of scientific reputation" https://t.…
RT @ghillardi: Nice new paper by @intel researchers "The h-index is no longer an effective correlate of scientific reputation" https://t.…
RT @ghillardi: Nice new paper by @intel researchers "The h-index is no longer an effective correlate of scientific reputation" https://t.…
RT @ghillardi: Nice new paper by @intel researchers "The h-index is no longer an effective correlate of scientific reputation" https://t.…
Nice new paper by @intel researchers "The h-index is no longer an effective correlate of scientific reputation" https://t.co/aCfPD7WK24
Who would've thought... #PLOSONE: The h-index is no longer an effective correlate of scientific reputation https://t.co/wxBPr3GVlF
RT @knrajlibrary: The h-index is no longer an effective correlate of scientific reputation https://t.co/Spdu5RHAX0
#rrbm https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0253397
Why the h-index is no longer an effective indicator of scientific reputation; correlation of the h-index with awards that indicate recognition by the scientific community has substantially declined. #impact...
The h-index is no longer an effective correlate of scientific reputation - https://goo.gl/scholar/f8nYTD #ScholarAlerts
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0253397 55. A. Jain; K.S. Khor; D. Beard; et al. Do journals raise their impact factor or SCImago ranking by self-citing in ...
... journals that publish a lot of our obscure, but important to have ... 10.1371/journal.pone.0253397. For the people I know, it seems that ...
16:e0253397. 10.1371/journal.pone.0253397 4. Graz University of Technology: a critical look at the ResearchGate score as a measure of ...
" PLOS ONE Владлен Колтун, Дэвид Хафнер Опубликовано: 28 июня 2021 г. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0253397 · ParkingCrew1562. • ...
... Koltun, David Hafner Δημοσιεύτηκε: 28 Ιουνίου 2021 https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0253397 · ParkingCrew1562. • πριν από 7 μήνες.
" PLOS ONE Vladlen Koltun, David Hafner Megjelent: 2021. június 28. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0253397 · ParkingCrew1562. • ...
" PLOS ONE Vladlen Koltun ,David Hafner Published: June 28, 2021 https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0253397 · ParkingCrew1562. • 7mo ago.
" PLOS ONE Vladlen Koltun, David Hafner Julkaistu: 28. kesäkuuta 2021 https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0253397 · ParkingCrew1562.
PLOS ONE Vladlen Koltun ,David Hafner 發表日期：2021 年6 月28 日https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0253397 · ParkingCrew1562. • 7 個月前.
... PLOS ONE Vladlen Koltun, David Hafner Publicado: 28 de junho de 2021 https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0253397 · ParkingCrew1562. • há 6 ...
” PLOS ONE Vladlen Koltun，David Hafner 发布于：2021年6月28日 https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0253397 · ParkingCrew1562. • 7个月前.
... Vladlen Koltun, David Hafner Opublikowano: 28 czerwca 2021 r. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0253397 · ParkingCrew1562. • 7 mies. temu.
... Vladlen Koltun, David Hafner Yayınlanma Tarihi: 28 Haziran 2021 https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0253397 · ParkingCrew1562. • 7 ay önce.
... PLOS ONE Vladlen Koltun, David Hafner Publicado: 28 de junho de 2021 https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0253397 · ParkingCrew1562. • há 5 ...
References. V Koltun and D Hafner, PLOS One, 2021, DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0253397 ... Why are the first papers of some online-only journals ...
... (e0253397), (2021).https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0253397 · Crossref. See more. Loading... Citation information is sourced from Crossref ...
KZ
HB
RS
IA
DP
GG
M
A
CH
MM
MR
DL
JH
AW
AR
GZ
N
H
H
SD
CM
H
OM
JB
DH
AR
GM
AB
OS
ME
マ猫
PP
D
N
R
BP
AP
EM
松で
SZ
AD
BC
SM
OO
圧圧
AP
MY
KS
福
BB
SM
OÇ
KP
TT
PA
JM
GP
SK
SJ
AP
OC
IG
J
SM
WG
NG
AP
ML
FM
CM
SL
PS
JM
L
C徐
DP
C
RT
H
CH
T
DT
MA
A
FS
AS
JE
MA
M
SI
SC
TP
ED
SR
NP
FH
FS
AC
CZ
MP
SM
LD
MS
MÅ
DJ
PP
M
PG
P马
MR
JD
HP
DS
GM
EE
MC
SL
AC
AO
MB
QI
CV
DM
AS
VF
JG
LS
EM
CC
RS
FG
MW
CO
JC
AV
PA
YN
IA
PF
DH
NE
MB
KJ
FS
LR
MI
W
CH
T
NY
M
ES
FD
MC
AT