Mentions
Extended reach
Total likes
Video views
AI synopsis
Posts highlight specific findings from the study, such as the distinction in environmental impacts between meat, particularly beef and lamb, and plant-based options. For instance, discussions emphasized phrases like 'it's hard to overstate the importance' and 'foods with more nutrition tend to be more sustainable,' showcasing a tone of urgency and significance regarding the transition towards more sustainable dietary practices. The choice of words reflects a strong belief in the importance of the findings, contributing to the overall positive sentiment.
Many discussions express support for the findings regarding the environmental impacts of various food products.
The discussions reflect a high level of curiosity and enthusiasm about the article's insights.
Several posts delve into specific aspects of the methodology and results, indicating moderate engagement with the content.
A strong perception exists that the publication has significant implications for environmental policy and individual dietary choices.
It's hard to overstate how important a switch away from beef and lamb would be in terms of environmental impact. https://t.co/fhOqXtiQNK https://t.co/Ca7yDrLr2x
On a parfois du mal à se représenter le saut dans l'impact environnemental qu'il y a entre la viande rouge et le reste des aliments. Je trouve cette figure de Clark et al. (2022) très parlante. ⬇️ https://t.co/KGNIo0FkMm https://t.co/oc7EiKZ9Xs https://t.co/pQBHUFFY1W
Es geht hier nur um die Wurst: Ersatzprodukte sind bei Würsteln IMMER besser für die Umwelt und auch FAST IMMER gesünder für den Menschen. Hier die Studie: https://t.co/uz1k55eUKN https://t.co/0FTvLMgGxQ
@OurWorldInData We've had data on food commodities from the large meta-analysis by Poore & Nemecek (2018) for a while. Now a new paper uses this data to assess the footprints of more than 57,000 specific food products: https://t.co/K6wc52wgm6 This is the data I've added for you to explore. 1/
Relevant refs https://t.co/gL8ejUsZxm https://t.co/V5iuQIkFCJ https://t.co/BnCeJPj5yz https://t.co/FUmR6Lswk9 https://t.co/2uWeJGo3NH https://t.co/oPLqgheGZ0 https://t.co/vD4cQgiRWs https://t.co/dmUV1ZnurY
Again, for the record, our new study "Estimating the environmental impacts of 57,000 food products" in @PNASNews: 1) Wasn't co-authored by a
This video discusses the impact of our diets on the climate. It explores how meals—from breakfast to lunch—affect greenhouse gas emissions and ecological footprints. Learn about a meal plan that promotes health while…
Understanding the environmental impacts of food products is essential for transitioning to sustainable food systems. This video explores innovative methods to estimate impacts on greenhouse gas emissions, land use…
Many dietary models don't accurately reflect people's eating habits or the environmental impact of food production. The study analyzed dietary data from over 55,000 individuals across various eating preferences, linking…
Estimating the environmental impacts of 57,000 food products. www.pnas.org/doi/full/10.... In the UK and Ireland shows food types have low (e.g., sugary beverages, fruits, breads), to intermediate (e.g., many desserts, pastries), to high environmental impacts (e.g., meat, fish, cheese).
RT @florianederer: It's hard to overstate how important a switch away from beef and lamb would be in terms of environmental impact. https:/…
You can always feel good about enjoying locally grown WA Potatoes - they are good for your health, your budget & renowned as a sustainable food
RT @EspinosaRomain: On a parfois du mal à se représenter le saut dans l'impact environnemental qu'il y a entre la viande rouge et le reste…
RT @k_pyrc: A tu jeszcze fajna przeglądówka z PNAS: "różne rodzaje żywności mają niski (np. napoje słodzone, owoce, pieczywo), średni (np.…
A tu jeszcze fajna przeglądówka z PNAS: "różne rodzaje żywności mają niski (np. napoje słodzone, owoce, pieczywo), średni (np. wiele deserów, ciastek) lub wysoki wpływ na środowisko (np. mięso, ryby, ser)." https://t.co/smKgytNgcY https://t.co/GfsPTMj5Eu
RT @EspinosaRomain: On a parfois du mal à se représenter le saut dans l'impact environnemental qu'il y a entre la viande rouge et le reste…
RT @florianederer: It's hard to overstate how important a switch away from beef and lamb would be in terms of environmental impact. https:/…
RT @florianederer: It's hard to overstate how important a switch away from beef and lamb would be in terms of environmental impact. https:/…
RT @florianederer: It's hard to overstate how important a switch away from beef and lamb would be in terms of environmental impact. https:/…
RT @florianederer: It's hard to overstate how important a switch away from beef and lamb would be in terms of environmental impact. https:/…
RT @florianederer: It's hard to overstate how important a switch away from beef and lamb would be in terms of environmental impact. https:/…
RT @florianederer: It's hard to overstate how important a switch away from beef and lamb would be in terms of environmental impact. https:/…
RT @florianederer: It's hard to overstate how important a switch away from beef and lamb would be in terms of environmental impact. https:/…
RT @florianederer: It's hard to overstate how important a switch away from beef and lamb would be in terms of environmental impact. https:/…
RT @florianederer: It's hard to overstate how important a switch away from beef and lamb would be in terms of environmental impact. https:/…
RT @florianederer: It's hard to overstate how important a switch away from beef and lamb would be in terms of environmental impact. https:/…
RT @florianederer: It's hard to overstate how important a switch away from beef and lamb would be in terms of environmental impact. https:/…
RT @florianederer: It's hard to overstate how important a switch away from beef and lamb would be in terms of environmental impact. https:/…
RT @florianederer: It's hard to overstate how important a switch away from beef and lamb would be in terms of environmental impact. https:/…
RT @florianederer: It's hard to overstate how important a switch away from beef and lamb would be in terms of environmental impact. https:/…
RT @EspinosaRomain: On a parfois du mal à se représenter le saut dans l'impact environnemental qu'il y a entre la viande rouge et le reste…
RT @florianederer: It's hard to overstate how important a switch away from beef and lamb would be in terms of environmental impact. https:/…
RT @florianederer: It's hard to overstate how important a switch away from beef and lamb would be in terms of environmental impact. https:/…
RT @florianederer: It's hard to overstate how important a switch away from beef and lamb would be in terms of environmental impact. https:/…
RT @florianederer: It's hard to overstate how important a switch away from beef and lamb would be in terms of environmental impact. https:/…
RT @florianederer: It's hard to overstate how important a switch away from beef and lamb would be in terms of environmental impact. https:/…
RT @EspinosaRomain: On a parfois du mal à se représenter le saut dans l'impact environnemental qu'il y a entre la viande rouge et le reste…
RT @EspinosaRomain: On a parfois du mal à se représenter le saut dans l'impact environnemental qu'il y a entre la viande rouge et le reste…
RT @EspinosaRomain: On a parfois du mal à se représenter le saut dans l'impact environnemental qu'il y a entre la viande rouge et le reste…
RT @florianederer: It's hard to overstate how important a switch away from beef and lamb would be in terms of environmental impact. https:/…
RT @EspinosaRomain: On a parfois du mal à se représenter le saut dans l'impact environnemental qu'il y a entre la viande rouge et le reste…
RT @florianederer: It's hard to overstate how important a switch away from beef and lamb would be in terms of environmental impact. https:/…
RT @florianederer: It's hard to overstate how important a switch away from beef and lamb would be in terms of environmental impact. https:/…
RT @florianederer: It's hard to overstate how important a switch away from beef and lamb would be in terms of environmental impact. https:/…
RT @florianederer: It's hard to overstate how important a switch away from beef and lamb would be in terms of environmental impact. https:/…
RT @florianederer: It's hard to overstate how important a switch away from beef and lamb would be in terms of environmental impact. https:/…
RT @florianederer: It's hard to overstate how important a switch away from beef and lamb would be in terms of environmental impact. https:/…
RT @florianederer: It's hard to overstate how important a switch away from beef and lamb would be in terms of environmental impact. https:/…
RT @florianederer: It's hard to overstate how important a switch away from beef and lamb would be in terms of environmental impact. https:/…
RT @florianederer: It's hard to overstate how important a switch away from beef and lamb would be in terms of environmental impact. https:/…
RT @florianederer: It's hard to overstate how important a switch away from beef and lamb would be in terms of environmental impact. https:/…
RT @florianederer: It's hard to overstate how important a switch away from beef and lamb would be in terms of environmental impact. https:/…
RT @florianederer: It's hard to overstate how important a switch away from beef and lamb would be in terms of environmental impact. https:/…
RT @florianederer: It's hard to overstate how important a switch away from beef and lamb would be in terms of environmental impact. https:/…
RT @florianederer: It's hard to overstate how important a switch away from beef and lamb would be in terms of environmental impact. https:/…
RT @florianederer: It's hard to overstate how important a switch away from beef and lamb would be in terms of environmental impact. https:/…
RT @florianederer: It's hard to overstate how important a switch away from beef and lamb would be in terms of environmental impact. https:/…
RT @EspinosaRomain: On a parfois du mal à se représenter le saut dans l'impact environnemental qu'il y a entre la viande rouge et le reste…
It's hard to overstate how important a switch away from beef and lamb would be in terms of environmental impact. https://t.co/fhOqXtiQNK https://t.co/Ca7yDrLr2x
RT @EspinosaRomain: On a parfois du mal à se représenter le saut dans l'impact environnemental qu'il y a entre la viande rouge et le reste…
RT @EspinosaRomain: On a parfois du mal à se représenter le saut dans l'impact environnemental qu'il y a entre la viande rouge et le reste…
RT @EspinosaRomain: On a parfois du mal à se représenter le saut dans l'impact environnemental qu'il y a entre la viande rouge et le reste…
RT @EspinosaRomain: On a parfois du mal à se représenter le saut dans l'impact environnemental qu'il y a entre la viande rouge et le reste…
RT @EspinosaRomain: On a parfois du mal à se représenter le saut dans l'impact environnemental qu'il y a entre la viande rouge et le reste…
RT @EspinosaRomain: On a parfois du mal à se représenter le saut dans l'impact environnemental qu'il y a entre la viande rouge et le reste…
RT @EspinosaRomain: On a parfois du mal à se représenter le saut dans l'impact environnemental qu'il y a entre la viande rouge et le reste…
RT @EspinosaRomain: On a parfois du mal à se représenter le saut dans l'impact environnemental qu'il y a entre la viande rouge et le reste…
RT @EspinosaRomain: On a parfois du mal à se représenter le saut dans l'impact environnemental qu'il y a entre la viande rouge et le reste…
RT @EspinosaRomain: On a parfois du mal à se représenter le saut dans l'impact environnemental qu'il y a entre la viande rouge et le reste…
On a parfois du mal à se représenter le saut dans l'impact environnemental qu'il y a entre la viande rouge et le reste des aliments. Je trouve cette figure de Clark et al. (2022) très parlante. ⬇️ https://t.co/KGNIo0FkMm https://t.co/oc7EiKZ9Xs https://t.co/pQBHUFFY1W
In 2022, this report showed us that even processed plant-based foods (like vegan burger patties or fish-less filets) are more sustainable than the meat they replace. https://t.co/w9IXzOhx5u
In this study, plant-based foods were found to have far lower carbon footprints than animal products: https://t.co/w9IXzOhx5u
RT @IlonaKickbusch: Estimating the environmental impacts of 57,000 #food products | PNAS https://t.co/9APbxLicq3
RT @IlonaKickbusch: Estimating the environmental impacts of 57,000 #food products | PNAS https://t.co/9APbxLicq3
RT @JPNessFant: Apparently, this is a fairly new concept...which is confusing, but I'm happy it's finally come! Also, the methodology in t…
Estimating the environmental impacts of 57,000 #food products | PNAS https://t.co/9APbxLicq3
@deane_ag @ClimateFramo @civiltalker Idk the situation in NZ specifically. What about the environmental impact of ruminant meat for other indicators such as use of land, water & energy, potential for acidification & eutrophication?
Vegan is better for the environment. Not for every food option and here tested for special products. https://t.co/7EkXWsaCh8 https://t.co/QYo27Jm1Uy
Estimating the environmental impacts of 57,000 food products | Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences https://t.co/TpfCCUrmtZ
RT @FranzSinabell: Das Wissen über die Umweltauswirkungen unserer Nahrung nimmt beständig zu. Das ist auch nötig. Schließlich stehen ca. 25…
RT @FranzSinabell: Das Wissen über die Umweltauswirkungen unserer Nahrung nimmt beständig zu. Das ist auch nötig. Schließlich stehen ca. 25…
RT @FranzSinabell: Das Wissen über die Umweltauswirkungen unserer Nahrung nimmt beständig zu. Das ist auch nötig. Schließlich stehen ca. 25…
RT @FranzSinabell: Das Wissen über die Umweltauswirkungen unserer Nahrung nimmt beständig zu. Das ist auch nötig. Schließlich stehen ca. 25…
RT @FranzSinabell: Das Wissen über die Umweltauswirkungen unserer Nahrung nimmt beständig zu. Das ist auch nötig. Schließlich stehen ca. 25…
Das Wissen über die Umweltauswirkungen unserer Nahrung nimmt beständig zu. Das ist auch nötig. Schließlich stehen ca. 25% der Treibhausgasemissionen global im Zusammenhang mit der Ernährung.
Pour ceux qui veulent aller plus loin les données proviennent de: https://t.co/96tBJYXCdR
RT @Koen_VdE:
@EU_ScienceHub I don't think anybody can trust it if you call gas and nuclear "green". More scientific efforts like this would be useful: https://t.co/RdOKl7FSCU
@NavarroPerezAnt @osayagues @SpainMerino Menos sarcasmo y más hincar los codos antes de hablar desde el desconocimiento de algo. https://t.co/16EckbRHCD https://t.co/eEx7GVsAO0 https://t.co/1da2dVKGFC
RT @HeuraFoods:
RT @HeuraFoods:
RT @HeurafoodsFr: On oublie parfois que l'eau est une ressource limitée, on oublie parfois comment elle est gaspillée et qu'il y a des faço…
@DraCoMeGa_ @191512118P @HeurafoodsFr de là, ils l'ont donnée : https://t.co/lhnlk5ObXL
On oublie parfois que l'eau est une ressource limitée, on oublie parfois comment elle est gaspillée et qu'il y a des façons plus efficaces de l'utiliser que d'autres. Source: 'Estimating the environmental impacts of 57,000 food products', Michael Clark et al (2022).
We highlight @MikaelFogelholm's recommendation of this @Oxford_NDPH @PNASNews paper estimating the environmental impacts of 57,000 food products, with meat, fish, & cheese having the highest impact. https://t.co/ksZtzInodF https://t.co/B9cCVUuUcH
@BurntOutUtopian @MikeHudema FYI, I went to Oxford, so reading papers like this is part of life. So read I went to the source: https://t.co/mTuLSJNHhy It doesn't actually plot nutritional density in the paper. "We assessed the nutrition quality of products using NutriScore" Which *very* different.
@jwmares 13) Don't just listen to me, though. Here are some great resources to learn for yourself! https://t.co/JRoeeBoV2O https://t.co/34btocZxp6 https://t.co/JXc9hE9r1e https://t.co/SqLjgaQI7R https://t.co/z7bUbfwyY5 https://t.co/1rmbpYUq5s https://t.co/VYPOwhWVi4
@merjapen Käsittääkseni jonkun verran. Mutta ei sekään välttämättä mikään erinomainen vaihtoehto ole. https://t.co/LqwRZzp0if https://t.co/ZqyTv7tjdZ
@lameutiste @Yves_Fun en plus la viande d'agneau émet autant de GES que celle de bœuf! https://t.co/M9jMY7CPC0
RT @TyRBeal: Relevant refs https://t.co/gL8ejUsZxm https://t.co/V5iuQIkFCJ https://t.co/BnCeJPj5yz https://t.co/FUmR6Lswk9 https://t.co/2uW…
RT @sarahbridle: Mike Clark and others @oxmartinschool looked at the environmental impacts and nutrition of different types of sausage #oxl…
Relevant refs https://t.co/gL8ejUsZxm https://t.co/V5iuQIkFCJ https://t.co/BnCeJPj5yz https://t.co/FUmR6Lswk9 https://t.co/2uWeJGo3NH https://t.co/oPLqgheGZ0 https://t.co/vD4cQgiRWs https://t.co/dmUV1ZnurY
RT @sarahbridle: Mike Clark and others @oxmartinschool looked at the environmental impacts and nutrition of different types of sausage #oxl…
RT @sarahbridle: Mike Clark and others @oxmartinschool looked at the environmental impacts and nutrition of different types of sausage #oxl…
RT @sarahbridle: Brilliant work by Mike Clark of @oxmartinschool at #oxleap23 calculating environment scores for 57,000 foods using labels…
RT @sarahbridle: Mike Clark and others @oxmartinschool looked at the environmental impacts and nutrition of different types of sausage #oxl…
Mike Clark and others @oxmartinschool looked at the environmental impacts and nutrition of different types of sausage #oxleap23 There's a range, but vegan sausages healthier and better for environment than ruminant (beef, lamb) sausages https://t.co/gG51lk4Ljy https://t.co/WxTkcR6gk9
Brilliant work by Mike Clark of @oxmartinschool at #oxleap23 calculating environment scores for 57,000 foods using labels https://t.co/gG51lk4Ljy - highlights big differences between foods https://t.co/zt7U9Cl8Ca
For #veganuary, we highlight @MikaelFogelholm recommendation of this @Oxford_NDPH @PNASNews paper estimating the environmental impacts of 57,000 food products, with meat, fish, & cheese having the highest impact. https://t.co/ksZtzInodF https://t.co/oGO1RXWWEv
RT @BioTay: Otro estudio con resultados similares: Han analizado el impacto ambiental de 57000 alimentos. Las alternativas vegetales a la…
@maeool Vu que 99% des terres utilisées sont agricoles tu peux faire une analyse du régime en partant de chiffres comme https://t.co/HBtplAXWXV
The results of this study illustrate how our dietary choices can have real, measurable environmental consequences,. This is strong evidence on how much of a positive environmental impact an individual can have by simply reducing their meat consumption. https://t.co/sMZJECZnRT
Estimating the environmental impacts of 57,000 food products | PNAS https://t.co/4AB0jyXvlO
Here's the paper: https://t.co/yGW6jRmSK4 @PNASNews
Estimating the environmental impacts of 57,000 food products https://t.co/sdhFgyr9tn https://t.co/QsKlr0dz3I
Estimating the environmental impacts of 57,000 food products | Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences https://t.co/wRkJ13RsZm
My kid has gone vegetarian. What do I need to know (especially if they're a picky eater)? @ConversationEDU https://t.co/DrYuOLnL0F https://t.co/UTQFf1FVmc
RT @UniofOxford: You can read the full paper here ⬇️ #WorldFoodDay [10/10] https://t.co/wxPFmAKBfJ
You can read the full paper here ⬇️ #WorldFoodDay [10/10] https://t.co/wxPFmAKBfJ
RT @TyRBeal: A new study finds that beef & lamb are >3 times worse for the environment than any other food when considering GHGs, water, la…
Estimating the environmental impacts of 57,000 food products | Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences https://t.co/wRkJ1494nW
Eco friendly shopping. Estimating the environmental impacts of 57,000 food products https://t.co/spuJre1vTQ @TheGreenRunnerz @Ultra_Damo @JasminKParis #thepaincoach #upandrun
RT @a_sator: Es geht hier nur um die Wurst: Ersatzprodukte sind bei Würsteln IMMER besser für die Umwelt und auch FAST IMMER gesünder für d…
RT @a_sator: Es geht hier nur um die Wurst: Ersatzprodukte sind bei Würsteln IMMER besser für die Umwelt und auch FAST IMMER gesünder für d…
RT @a_sator: Es geht hier nur um die Wurst: Ersatzprodukte sind bei Würsteln IMMER besser für die Umwelt und auch FAST IMMER gesünder für d…
RT @a_sator: Es geht hier nur um die Wurst: Ersatzprodukte sind bei Würsteln IMMER besser für die Umwelt und auch FAST IMMER gesünder für d…
RT @a_sator: Es geht hier nur um die Wurst: Ersatzprodukte sind bei Würsteln IMMER besser für die Umwelt und auch FAST IMMER gesünder für d…
RT @a_sator: Es geht hier nur um die Wurst: Ersatzprodukte sind bei Würsteln IMMER besser für die Umwelt und auch FAST IMMER gesünder für d…
RT @a_sator: Es geht hier nur um die Wurst: Ersatzprodukte sind bei Würsteln IMMER besser für die Umwelt und auch FAST IMMER gesünder für d…
RT @a_sator: Es geht hier nur um die Wurst: Ersatzprodukte sind bei Würsteln IMMER besser für die Umwelt und auch FAST IMMER gesünder für d…
RT @a_sator: Es geht hier nur um die Wurst: Ersatzprodukte sind bei Würsteln IMMER besser für die Umwelt und auch FAST IMMER gesünder für d…
Es geht hier nur um die Wurst: Ersatzprodukte sind bei Würsteln IMMER besser für die Umwelt und auch FAST IMMER gesünder für den Menschen. Hier die Studie: https://t.co/uz1k55eUKN https://t.co/0FTvLMgGxQ
Apparently, this is a fairly new concept...which is confusing, but I'm happy it's finally come! Also, the methodology in this is...well, we may need to get the vapours! https://t.co/cviFQxeojH
RT @BioTay: Otro estudio con resultados similares: Han analizado el impacto ambiental de 57000 alimentos. Las alternativas vegetales a la…
https://t.co/oXa3SnWYos
Interesting database. Which food is best (or worst) for the planet? @SapereScienza Estimating the environmental impacts of 57,000 food products | Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences https://t.co/JlL6MtTOGZ
RT @Sheril_: A new PNAS paper estimated the environmental impact of 57,000 food products & the results favor chips. https://t.co/tlWZhi1qIj…
RT @Sheril_: A new PNAS paper estimated the environmental impact of 57,000 food products & the results favor chips. https://t.co/tlWZhi1qIj…
Source : M. Clark et al., PNAS (2022) https://t.co/7LLwtA6rUD
Nice study on the #carbonfootprint of a large number of food items, with an inventive method for estimating ingredient composition. Couple of surprises in there, but overall picture remains: meat = bad, plants = better. https://t.co/RHRWDcioLV
@HeidiV76 Tutkijoiden taustat näkee kyllä, ei jää arvailun varaan. https://t.co/RUV4R9hqWv https://t.co/b0GexcGGLy
Voici le lien vers l'étude en question : https://t.co/8iMa67ZiSJ. 6/ https://t.co/xWi9fqq0Fg
RT @BioTay: Otro estudio con resultados similares: Han analizado el impacto ambiental de 57000 alimentos. Las alternativas vegetales a la…
Estimating the environmental impacts of 57,000 food products | PNAS https://t.co/gXZ072AhXB
@EddieReynolds_ @hasplin @RoxanaPaun8 @Leelush33 @cpsavesoil @SaveSoilGermany Estimating the environmental impacts of 57,000 food products | Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences https://t.co/DuDKpuwksn
RT @AnnieLeymarie: Whichever ways one draws graphs of foods' environmental impacts, those from beef and lamb are so high they jump almost o…
RT @TyRBeal: A new study finds that beef & lamb are >3 times worse for the environment than any other food when considering GHGs, water, la…
RT @JidduAlexander: Hi #RStats, great resource here for practicing some R skills https://t.co/mVWT0Xmr9R
RT @JidduAlexander: Hi #RStats, great resource here for practicing some R skills https://t.co/mVWT0Xmr9R
Hi #RStats, great resource here for practicing some R skills https://t.co/mVWT0Xmr9R
RT @Sheril_: A new PNAS paper estimated the environmental impact of 57,000 food products & the results favor chips. https://t.co/tlWZhi1qIj…
RT @plantbaseddocIE: https://t.co/wMpz4KWx9U Study of over 57,000 food products in UK & Ireland has found that as a general rule of thumb,…
Tutkimus, johon Hesarin juttu viittaa: https://t.co/FMdpPb3EAV
RT @plantbaseddocIE: https://t.co/wMpz4KWx9U Study of over 57,000 food products in UK & Ireland has found that as a general rule of thumb,…
https://t.co/wMpz4KWx9U Study of over 57,000 food products in UK & Ireland has found that as a general rule of thumb, foods high in nutrients and healthy are also environmentally sustainable. Good news all around
@HamlettClaire @TEOTWP “Estimating the environmental impacts of 57,000 food products” (Note that “almond production results in relatively few greenhouse gas emissions but typically results in high levels of water stress.”) https://t.co/zQvByuTvgK
RT @qikipedia: A new study examined 57,000 foods on their relative nutritiousness and environmental impacts. Onion rings and chips do part…
RT @SilvanaDenicolo: @DavideDavidec @Giussete @OfficialTozzi Oltre a non saper leggere, non si sa neanche più usare google. E questo per un…
Estimating the environmental impacts of 57,000 food products | Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences https://t.co/1wahEbbFkR
Estimating the environmental impacts of 57,000 food products | Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences https://t.co/Y8jKPNVyoo Interesting analysis on a tricky issue!
@DavideDavidec @Giussete @OfficialTozzi Oltre a non saper leggere, non si sa neanche più usare google. E questo per un tweeter è grave
Yikes data: Estimating the environmental impacts of 57,000 food products: https://t.co/bLxakJdfzk
RT @Sheril_: A new PNAS paper estimated the environmental impact of 57,000 food products & the results favor chips. https://t.co/tlWZhi1qIj…
Estimating the environmental impacts of 57,000 food products across four indicators: greenhouse gas emissions, land use, water stress, and eutrophication potential. | Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences https://t.co/ibZoe5neYy https://t.co/tj93Nuzyn1
RT @Wisar3: Nieuwe studie van de Universiteit van Oxford toont aan dat producten met een goede #NutriScore ook goed zijn voor het milieu ……
RT @Wisar3: Nieuwe studie van de Universiteit van Oxford toont aan dat producten met een goede #NutriScore ook goed zijn voor het milieu ……
Nieuwe studie van de Universiteit van Oxford toont aan dat producten met een goede #NutriScore ook goed zijn voor het milieu … https://t.co/x9jHfuBXWS #NutriScore #Eiwittransitie #GezondeVoeding #Milieu #klimaat #Ecoscore #Innovatie #LCA https://t.co/C6iHrStcmW
Estimating the environmental impacts of 57,000 food products | Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences https://t.co/0WFKfXgAmI 역시 육류는 가장 피해야 할 음식...
RT @InsMichelSerres: Estimating the environmental impacts of 57,000 food products. The environmental impact of a multi-ingredient food prod…
Estimating the environmental impacts of 57,000 food products. The environmental impact of a multi-ingredient food product is determined by the mass and environmental impact of each ingredient. https://t.co/w7OqgJyvh5
Estimating the environmental impacts of 57,000 food products | Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences https://t.co/9yp8BpUcPC
Estimating the environmental impacts of 57,000 food products | Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences https://t.co/UhsqWalasl @jaimemaussan1
RT @DrWhatTheFudge: Acaba de salir un estudio donde reportan el impacto ambiental que generan ciertos productos alimenticios (57 mil) de ac…
Acaba de salir un estudio donde reportan el impacto ambiental que generan ciertos productos alimenticios (57 mil) de acuerdo a la emisión de gases de invernadero, consumo de agua, uso de tierras y el potencial de eutrofización. Éste es el resumen: https://t.co/0XWCPE26VG https://t.co/jKiuNiXVvO
Estimating the environmental impacts of 57,000 food products Study of Oxford 2022. Food without meat is better.
@REV_Insulin_Res https://t.co/BpGkXH5frH Estimating the environmental impacts of 57,000 food products But you know it better then research from Oxford 2022. I am sure. You know it better!!!! You do not learn much.
RT @TyRBeal: A new study finds that beef & lamb are >3 times worse for the environment than any other food when considering GHGs, water, la…
Estimating the environmental impacts of 57,000 food products | Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences https://t.co/f9TGGgUXR4
RT @AnnieLeymarie: Whichever ways one draws graphs of foods' environmental impacts, those from beef and lamb are so high they jump almost o…
Estimating the environmental impacts of 57,000 food products | Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences https://t.co/8f3ElVDnEa
RT @TyRBeal: A new study finds that beef & lamb are >3 times worse for the environment than any other food when considering GHGs, water, la…
@CesarMassi @antonella_risso @_HannahRitchie @OurWorldInData Esos datos son para productos alimenticios puestos en retailers en UK, así que hay que ser muy cuidadosos con su uso. Para mas info sobre el estudio pueden consultar info adicional acá: https://t.co/Gkwj3U4lf6
Check out this new article, Estimating the environmental impacts of 57,000 food products. @Ftfpotatopjt isn’t surprised that potatoes are a low environmental impact food AND they’re full of potassium and fiber and NO cholesterol! #potatoes https://t.co/bqNmCDIIhI
@OurWorldInData ... This is excellent and allows more #sustainable food choices and better information on #diets that help mitigate #climatechange. Thanks @_HannahRitchie! (The work builds on the recent publication by Clark et al.: https://t.co/J2lZoWV1uC.)
@skepteis But they are the more nutritious with the less ecological impact ;( (https://t.co/HS55YTeWDQ)
Estimating the environmental impacts of 57,000 food products https://t.co/J9zwvtSRGb
@btcforever69 @becker_meister @Thomas_aus_XYZ @OlafGersemann Warum so wissenschaftsfeindlich? Wenn es dich interessiert, dann lies dir die Studie durch und sag mir wo da Fehler sind. https://t.co/kC5ddfWZiA
RT @_HannahRitchie: @OurWorldInData We've had data on food commodities from the large meta-analysis by Poore & Nemecek (2018) for a while.…
@kkouete09 @ArisChristod Et c’est faux ce qu’il dit. Les simili-carnés permettent bien de construire des systèmes alimentaires durables car leur impact environnemental est bien inférieur à celui de la viande (et ça s’améliore chaque jour). Voir « Meat alternatives » à droite ici : https://t.co/I0QUmQFej2 https://t.co/Zi9PPEv02h
Estimating the environmental impacts of 57,000 food products https://t.co/5T3ZVAWCkH
Estimating the environmental impacts of 57,000 food products FOOD MATTERS A LOT, BUT SAFE GAURDING THE ENVIRONMENT ALSO MATTERS A LOT, A LOT FOR THE BETTER FUTURE, BETTER HEALTH One barrier to enabling transitions to more environ…https://t.co/yvudut7p95 https://t.co/YWS3aMnS4T
RT @WFSJ: #Resources #Environment Estimating the environmental impacts of 57,000 food products Paper by Michael Clark (@UniofOxford @PNAS…
#Resources #Environment Estimating the environmental impacts of 57,000 food products Paper by Michael Clark (@UniofOxford @PNASNews) & Team https://t.co/yrWwGhalG7 https://t.co/4bSZos8T9h
RT @jmmulet: En general, cuanto más sano es un producto, menor impacto ambiental tiene. Estimating the environmental impacts of 57,000 food…
A barrier for more #sustainable food systems is lack of #environment impact information. Estimating impacts of products (#emissions, #landuse, #waterstress, #eutrophication) in a standardized way enables informed decisions by #consumers & policy makers: https://t.co/J2lZoWV1uC
#Resources #Environment Estimating the environmental impacts of 57,000 food products Paper by Michael Clark (@UniofOxford @PNASNews) & Team https://t.co/yrWwGgSKOz https://t.co/Vl1WUmpeqq
Waste360:
RT @AnnieLeymarie: Whichever ways one draws graphs of foods' environmental impacts, those from beef and lamb are so high they jump almost o…
RT @_HannahRitchie: @OurWorldInData We've had data on food commodities from the large meta-analysis by Poore & Nemecek (2018) for a while.…
Estimating the #environment impact of 57,000 products shows a tendency for foods with more #nutrition to be more #sustainable. Food types have low (#fruits, breads) to high impacts (#meat, #fish, #cheese), enabling informed decisions: https://t.co/J2lZoWV1uC #emissions #landuse https://t.co/RoAczY7O61
”環境スコアと栄養情報を組み合わせて、より健康的食品が環境影響が低い傾向にあることを発見した。例外はある：ナッツとシーフードは栄養スコアは良いが環境影響は高い。 もと論文オープンアクセス https://t.co/N6RDOsm7ZB”⇒
RT @_HannahRitchie: @OurWorldInData We've had data on food commodities from the large meta-analysis by Poore & Nemecek (2018) for a while.…
RT @_HannahRitchie: @OurWorldInData We've had data on food commodities from the large meta-analysis by Poore & Nemecek (2018) for a while.…
@jeffrsebo This recent paper is also very interesting: https://t.co/OdBYQpWN3D https://t.co/RHA0wxbDzK
#Resources #Environment Estimating the environmental impacts of 57,000 food products Paper by Michael Clark (@UniofOxford @PNASNews) & Team https://t.co/yrWwGhalG7 https://t.co/nr3s0LnbDw
RT @T_Fiolet: Cette étude a la particularité de se baser sur les ingrédients des produits alimentaires plutôt que l'aliment individuel http…
Cette étude a la particularité de se baser sur les ingrédients des produits alimentaires plutôt que l'aliment individuel https://t.co/rxQYlu3BVP Le graphe original dan l'autre sens (je trouvais ça moins pratique pour lire les produits alimentaires) https://t.co/OInQZDcezm
Estimating the environmental impacts of 57,000 food products | Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences https://t.co/8okD4uGJVr
@OurWorldInData We've had data on food commodities from the large meta-analysis by Poore & Nemecek (2018) for a while. Now a new paper uses this data to assess the footprints of more than 57,000 specific food products: https://t.co/K6wc52wgm6 This is the data I've added for you to explore. 1/
RT @jmmulet: En general, cuanto más sano es un producto, menor impacto ambiental tiene. Estimating the environmental impacts of 57,000 food…
RT @jmmulet: En general, cuanto más sano es un producto, menor impacto ambiental tiene. Estimating the environmental impacts of 57,000 food…
Estimating the environmental impacts of 57,000 food products | Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences https://t.co/lZ2hQbsXbx
RT @jmmulet: En general, cuanto más sano es un producto, menor impacto ambiental tiene. Estimating the environmental impacts of 57,000 food…
RT @jmmulet: En general, cuanto más sano es un producto, menor impacto ambiental tiene. Estimating the environmental impacts of 57,000 food…
RT @jmmulet: En general, cuanto más sano es un producto, menor impacto ambiental tiene. Estimating the environmental impacts of 57,000 food…
En general, cuanto más sano es un producto, menor impacto ambiental tiene. Estimating the environmental impacts of 57,000 food products | Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences https://t.co/8s9XXbxi1H
RT @Irishwildlife: A new study has rated the environmental impact of >57,000 food items and found that beef and lamb have by far the highes…
RT @Irishwildlife: A new study has rated the environmental impact of >57,000 food items and found that beef and lamb have by far the highes…
RT @Irishwildlife: A new study has rated the environmental impact of >57,000 food items and found that beef and lamb have by far the highes…
RT @Irishwildlife: A new study has rated the environmental impact of >57,000 food items and found that beef and lamb have by far the highes…
RT @jdhill: Variation in environmental and nutritional effects of 503 supermarket sausage brands. Overall, Upper right (
RT @MikeRayner: Our new paper: Estimating the environmental impacts of 57,000 food products | Proceedings of the National Academy of Scienc…
One barrier to enabling transitions to more environmentally sustainable food systems is the lack of detailed environmental impact information. A good start: Estimating the environmental impacts of 57,000(!) food products: https://t.co/PfHyd6phY8 https://t.co/CbNuTexidv
RT @jdhill: Again, for the record, our new study "Estimating the environmental impacts of 57,000 food products" in @PNASNews: 1) Wasn't co-…
Estimating the environmental impacts of 57,000 food products | Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences https://t.co/Q0y0Rw7ybw
RT @jdhill: Variation in environmental and nutritional effects of 503 supermarket sausage brands. Overall, Upper right (
Estimating the environmental impacts of 57,000 food products | Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences https://t.co/JKy1GgGCdF
RT @jdhill: Again, for the record, our new study "Estimating the environmental impacts of 57,000 food products" in @PNASNews: 1) Wasn't co-…
RT @jdhill: Again, for the record, our new study "Estimating the environmental impacts of 57,000 food products" in @PNASNews: 1) Wasn't co-…
RT @jdhill: Again, for the record, our new study "Estimating the environmental impacts of 57,000 food products" in @PNASNews: 1) Wasn't co-…
Our paper in @PNASNews: https://t.co/JiKaFRmj7N @Nature article by @FKreier: https://t.co/565CeMjnzB @Independent article: https://t.co/UShNm7LhIQ (The Nature and The Independent articles came out the same day. What are the odds?
Again, for the record, our new study "Estimating the environmental impacts of 57,000 food products" in @PNASNews: 1) Wasn't co-authored by a
This. Estimating the environmental impacts of 57,000 food products | Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences https://t.co/QenTFdzBcX
Estimating the environmental impacts of 57,000 food products | PNAS https://t.co/gXZ072RkZB
Oops... I almost would have missed the datapoint for 'Beef & Lamb' in Fig.1 ;) Estimating the environmental impacts of 57,000 food products | Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences https://t.co/bd1kslVt0f
RT @MikeRayner: Our new paper: Estimating the environmental impacts of 57,000 food products | Proceedings of the National Academy of Scienc…
RT @MikeRayner: Our new paper: Estimating the environmental impacts of 57,000 food products | Proceedings of the National Academy of Scienc…
RT @MikeRayner: Our new paper: Estimating the environmental impacts of 57,000 food products | Proceedings of the National Academy of Scienc…
RT @jdhill:
Estimating the environmental impacts of 57,000 food products | Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences https://t.co/GzWwWZgU0C
RT @jdhill: Variation in environmental and nutritional effects of 503 supermarket sausage brands. Overall, Upper right (
Fig. 4 - potato chips and cola are in - happy days! - Estimating the environmental impacts of 57,000 food products | Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences https://t.co/T0iMVi6AIU
RT @jdhill: Variation in environmental and nutritional effects of 503 supermarket sausage brands. Overall, Upper right (
RT @jdhill: Variation in environmental and nutritional effects of 503 supermarket sausage brands. Overall, Upper right (
RT @jdhill: For the record, our new study: 1) Was not co-authored by a
RT @jdhill: For the record, our new study: 1) Was not co-authored by a
Estimating the environmental impacts of 57,000 food products | PNAS https://t.co/FU1JeEwbti
RT @jdhill:
RT @jdhill: Variation in environmental and nutritional effects of 503 supermarket sausage brands. Overall, Upper right (
Estimating the environmental impacts of 57,000 food products | Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences https://t.co/796avsNceW
RT @NanciGuestRDPhD: #New Estimating the #environmental impacts of 57,000 food products The #data is clear beef/lamb are most damaging due…
RT @NanciGuestRDPhD: #New Estimating the #environmental impacts of 57,000 food products The #data is clear beef/lamb are most damaging due…
RT @jdhill: Variation in environmental and nutritional effects of 503 supermarket sausage brands. Overall, Upper right (
For the record, our new study: 1) Was not co-authored by a
RT @jdhill:
RT @jdhill: Variation in environmental and nutritional effects of 503 supermarket sausage brands. Overall, Upper right (
RT @jdhill: Variation in environmental and nutritional effects of 503 supermarket sausage brands. Overall, Upper right (
RT @jdhill: Variation in environmental and nutritional effects of 503 supermarket sausage brands. Overall, Upper right (
RT @jdhill:
RT @jdhill:
RT @jdhill:
RT @jdhill:
RT @jdhill:
RT @jdhill:
RT @jdhill:
RT @jdhill:
RT @jdhill: Variation in environmental and nutritional effects of 503 supermarket sausage brands. Overall, Upper right (
RT @jdhill: Variation in environmental and nutritional effects of 503 supermarket sausage brands. Overall, Upper right (
RT @jdhill:
RT @EliskaSelinger: není bez limitací. V tuto chvíli není třeba možné započítat dopad zpracování jednotlivých základních potravin použitých…
RT @jdhill:
RT @jdhill:
RT @jdhill:
RT @jdhill:
RT @jdhill:
RT @jdhill:
RT @jdhill:
RT @jdhill:
RT @jdhill:
RT @jdhill:
RT @jdhill:
RT @jdhill:
RT @jdhill:
RT @jdhill:
RT @jdhill:
RT @jdhill:
RT @jdhill:
RT @jdhill:
RT @jdhill:
RT @jdhill:
RT @jdhill:
RT @jdhill:
RT @jdhill:
RT @jdhill:
RT @jdhill:
RT @jdhill:
RT @jdhill:
RT @jdhill:
RT @jdhill: Variation in environmental and nutritional effects of 503 supermarket sausage brands. Overall, Upper right (
RT @jdhill:
RT @jdhill:
RT @jdhill:
RT @jdhill:
RT @jdhill: Variation in environmental and nutritional effects of 503 supermarket sausage brands. Overall, Upper right (
RT @jdhill:
RT @jdhill:
RT @jdhill: Variation in environmental and nutritional effects of 503 supermarket sausage brands. Overall, Upper right (
RT @jdhill: Variation in environmental and nutritional effects of 503 supermarket sausage brands. Overall, Upper right (
RT @jdhill:
RT @jdhill:
RT @jdhill: Variation in environmental and nutritional effects of 503 supermarket sausage brands. Overall, Upper right (
RT @jdhill:
RT @jdhill:
RT @jdhill: